Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 11585 articles
Browse latest View live

Notes about Universal Objective Justification. Boycott the Emmaus Conference

$
0
0


These are some brief things to consider about the pet dogma of WELS, the ELS, and the LCMS - commonly called Universal Objective Justification, but also called Objective Justification, Universal Justification or--to be honest--Universalism.



  • The real founder of the LCMS Perryville branch was Martin Stephan, who never finished a college degree. He did not care to study Latin and Greek, but spent his time reading the literature of Pietism. He was not qualified to be a pastor, but the unique Pietistic congregation was allowed to extend him a call, St. John in Dresden.
  • CFW Walther completed a bachelor's degree at Leipzig University, which was entirely rationalistic at the time. Walther joined various Pietistic circles, first the Kuhn group and then the Stephan group of young clergy and professionals.
  • Stephan demanded absolute obedience to him among the young clergy who followed him. Any dissent was addressed with punishment and a forced apology and submission to Stephan's rule.
  • Walther's concept of justification came from Stephan, and it never varied after that. Not from Luther. Not from the Book of Concord. Not from Gerhard or Calov - but from Martin Stephan, semi-educated Pietist, syphilitic adulterer, spiritual tyrant.


  • The double justification language of UOJ--dearly loved and copied throughout the Synodical Conference--comes from the Calvinist translation of the Halle Pietist Georg C. Knapp. Leonard Woods was a famous Calvinist whose translation dominated American theology for a century. Walther liked the Woods terms, which the Germans had copied back in the Homeland, and so it spread like kudzu on a warm summer day.
  • Stephan's limited education included Halle University, where Knapp was the last of the Pietists before rationalism completely took over the school.
  • Halle University was central to American Lutheranism, from Muhlenberg, founder of the ULCA or LCA tradition to Stephan to Adolph Hoenecke, the WELS dogmatician. The Norwegians were Pietistic and so were the Swedes, even though the Swedes named their synod Augustana, after the Augsburg Confession.
  • Walther wanted to be the big dog in the LCMS and certainly taught his UOJ, but the LCMS was quite willing to print a justification by faith catechism in German in 1905. They still sell a KJV catechism which is entirely lacking in UOJ.
  • WELS is equally hypocritical, expelling Pastor Paul Rydecki for teaching justification by faith, but only playing patty-cake with VP Paul Kuske for the same "crime."
  • The Gausewitz (WELS) catechism, used by the entire Synodical Conference, did not teach UOJ, which is why there has been so much conflict from the addled leaders trying to force UOJ on their sect.
    Rydecki was kicked out while Kuske was relieved of his precious emeritus label.
    Oh. Oh.
No wonder Concordia Ft. Wayne is a hotbed of Romanism and Eastern Orthodoxy.


An Early Spring - The Edible Pod Pea Seeds Are Out

$
0
0
Sugar Snap Peas - note the dragon claws prized in Hong Kong.
My Aunt Grace Noel had me opening pea pods when I was a kid on their farm. That struck me as a lot of work for a truly delicious vegetable. I switched to edible pod peas and our family ate them raw all the time.

I am dying to plant all the seeds I have, but a look ahead says that peas are the only option for now. Peas love the cold and tolerate snow on them. That is why LeSeur, near Minneapolis, is famous for peas. Just pronounce the name right. LaSoor, not LaSewer Peas.

Sugar snap or snow peas can be grown to maturity with the peas shucked from the pods, but that is crazy. Perhaps this year I will grow enough to get to the stove and cook - for once. They are great raw and--like corn--lose flavor over time. The packages of pea seeds are out and ready for planting.

With seeds, the key is soil temperature. Peas love the cold and hate the heat, so they are perfect for the itchy gardener who has to get something going in the early spring. I have shocked gardeners with my peas growing in and through the snow. The Creator has given us a variety of plants so we can have food throughout the seasons.

And yes, even a pea-picker can get tired of his favorite vegetable, as we proved when I grew three pounds of pea seeds in Midland. Longing turned to loathing, and we switched to beans. We gave the dragon claws (tendrils) to our members from Hong Kong, who told us, "Peas are grown only for the dragon claws in Hong Kong. Are you sure we can have two grocery bags?"

Cutting the dragon claw tendrils meant even more peas grew, because fruiting plants will often grow more flowers and fruit again once the seed container is picked. Thus tomatoes, beans, and many fruits keep flowering - roses too. But not corn. One stalk - two ears.

Garden Follies
I continue to entertain myself with garden follies published here, there, and everywhere. The Farmers Almanac has suggestions on plant care, such as spreading wood ashes, fertilizer, etc. Like their weather reports, their planting directions are sufficiently broad to include everything, from fertilizer to compost.

At Walmart I saw fertilizer in the woe-begone garden center. Plants, seeds, and mulch will not arrive in January. The lonely lady at the register said, "We have a lot of cold night left."

The fertilizer was rated 10-0-10. What? The old standby was 10-10-10 or another combination of Zen and modern chemistry. The package said- "To protect the water table from phosphorous pollution..." Now the light goes on. Inorganic fertilizer has a minor effect and passes on to pollute the water table, where time and creatures overbalance the nutrition and produce algae blooms, which use up oxygen, which suffocate fish, etc.

Ho ho. I remember books scolding the gardener for using manure or compost with only a 1-1-1 rating - like rating Lutheran worship services by how many sub-woofers are in the sound system.

Here is the difference. Creation gardening means the organic matter on top is drawn into the soil by God's creatures and kept in the top twelves inches of earth.

Soil fungi are usually branched and quite capable of gathering organic compounds from different sources simultaneously. Once the nutrient material is inside the cellular membrane, it is transported back through the network of fungal hyphae that often ends at the root of a plant, where some fungi trade for exudates. Thus the same fungus can extend hyphae downward and outward, absorbing several crucial nutrients— phosphorus, copper, zinc, iron, nitrogen— as well as water. 

In the case of phosphorus , for example, the propensity of fungi to gather and transport it over distances is truly remarkable . 

This mineral is almost always chemically locked up in soils; even when it is applied as fertilizer, phosphorus becomes unavailable to plants within seconds. Not only do fungi seek out this necessary plant nutrient, but they have the ability to free it from its chemical and physical bonds. Then they transport their quarry back to plant roots, where the phosphorus is absorbed and utilized. 

Don’t forget that in those instances where a fungus brings food back to a plant root tip, it was attracted to that plant by the plant’s exudates. Fungi are good, but the plant is in control. 

Fungi and plant-available nitrogen 
Some fungi trade nutrients for exudates, but most often nutrients are released as waste after they are consumed by fungi or when the fungi die and are decayed. Much of what is released is nitrogen.

Lewis, Wayne; Lowenfels, Jeff; (2010-09-10). Teaming with Microbes: The Organic Gardener's Guide to the Soil Food Web, Revised Edition (Kindle Locations 906-912). Timber Press. Kindle Edition. 

This means the soil has been building fungi all winter, under the wood, leaves, and newspapers, ready to feed the plants I grow. We used to say, "Look beans, and peas and legumes build usable nitrogen in the soil through those nodules on the roots. Buy some fungi and put it on the seeds before planting, to make sure that happens. We have to fix nitrogen (provide usable nitrogen)."

But this is true, one way or another, with all plants. Fungi feed and water them in exchange for carbon.

Here is another bit of humor from the chemical gardeners. "Ach. Leaves are not much good for compost. They are mostly carbon. Use them if you must."

Mostly carbon? What do the the fungi crave - carbon. They give the plant what it wants in return for carbon.

And wood - absorbs nitrogen. "Watch out when adding wood to soil. In the long run it is good, but in the short run, it absorbs nitrogen." Thus the old gardening books and current gardening humor books.

Fellow gardeners, what have we learned about chemicals from Teaming With Microbes? They move around. In organic or Creation gardening, they do not leave but stay, traveling from creature to creature.

Wood mulch and sawdust absorb nitrogen to help in decomposition, and then return the nitrogen as the rotting matures. This is another way of saying the fungi handle the transactions, rotting the wood for us, turning wood into nutrition, and trapping the useful chemicals in the soil.




Luther's Sermon on Jesus Turning Water into Wine - The Marriage at Cana - John 2:1-11

$
0
0
Norma Boeckler


SECOND SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY.

German text: Erlangen edition II, 36; Walch II, 634; St. Louis II, 462.

TEXT:

John 2:1-11. And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: and Jesus also was bidden, and his disciples, to the marriage. And when the wine failed, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.

And Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. His mother saith unto the servants, Whatever he saith unto you, do it. Now there were six waterpots of stone set there after the Jews’ manner of purifying, containing two or three firkins apiece. Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they tilled them up to the brim. And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the ruler of the feast. And they bare it. And when the ruler of the feast tasted the water now become wine, and knew not whence it was (but the servants that had drawn the water knew), the ruler of the feast calleth the bridegroom, and saith unto him, Every man setteth on first the good wine; and when men have drunk freely, then that which is worse: thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of his signs did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested his glory; and his disciples believed on him.

CONTENTS:

A CONSOLATION. A DOCTRINE AND EXAMPLE, AND THE SPIRITUAL MEANING OF THIS MARRIAGE.

* The outline of this exposition I. THE CONSOLATION OF MARRIED PEOPLE AND THE HONOR OF THE MARRIAGE STATE.

1. The first consolation and honor

2. The second consolation and honor 3-6.

* Of the Wedding. a. What we are to think of the great show and cost of weddings 7-10. b. What opinion should we have of dancing and music at weddings 11.

II. THE DOCTRINE AND EXAMPLE OF LOVE AND FAITH.

1. Of love

2. Of faith. a. That this doctrine and example is very wonderful 18f.

* Where divine grace exists and does not exist 13-14. b. How the character of faith is here exhibited 15f.

* Of the strong spiritual temptations

17. c. Why this doctrine and example are the highest theme in the Gospel 18f.

* In what way temptation is to be overcome 18.

* One should know neither father nor mother in the things and service of God

* Parents should rear their children not according to their own ideas, but as God’s Word teaches

20. d. This doctrine teaches that faith never faileth 21.

III. THE SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATION OF THIS MARRIAGE.

1. Of the marriage in itself 22, 2. That it was in Cana

3. That it was in Galilee

4. That Christ was bidden to this marriage

5. That Christ’s disciples and mother were present.

6. Of the waterpots of stone: a. Of the waterpots them selves 27. b. That there were six of them 28. c. Of the water that was in them 29. d. That they were of stone

7. That the water was turned in to wine 31-33.

8. Of the servants who had drawn the water: a. Of the servants themselves 34. b. Of their drawing it 35. c. That these servants knew whence this wine was 36.

9. Of the ruler of the feast: a. That he tasted the wine, and did not know whence it was 37. b. That he addressed the bridegroom 38-39.

1. Enough has been written heretofore on marriage; hence we leave that subject for the present, and treat the following three topics in this Gospel text: first, the consolation this history affords married people by virtue of their marriage; secondly, the faith and love revealed in this Gospel lesson; thirdly, the spiritual significance of this marriage.

I. THE CONSOLATION OF MARRIED PEOPLE AND THE GLORY OF THE MARRIED STATE.

2. In the first place, it is indeed a high honor paid to married life for Christ himself to attend this marriage, together with his mother and his disciples.

Moreover, his mother is present as the one arranging the wedding, the parties married being apparently her poor relatives or neighbors, and she being compelled to act as the bride’s mother; so of course, it was nothing more than a wedding, and in no way a display. For Christ lived up to his doctrine, not going to the rich, but to the poor; or, if he does go to the great and rich, he is sure to rebuke and reprove, coming away with disfavor, earning small thanks at their hands, with no thought of honoring them by a miracle as he does here.

3. Now the second honor is his giving good wine for the poor marriage by means of a great miracle, making himself the bride’s chief cup-bearer; it may be too that he had no money or jewel to give as a wedding present. He never did such honor to the life or doings of the Pharisees; for by this miracle he confirms marriage as the work and institution of God, no matter how common or how lowly it appears in the eyes of men, God none the less acknowledges his own work and loves it. Even our Caiaphases themselves have often declared and preached that marriage was the only state instituted by God. Who then instituted the others? Certainly not God, but the devil by means of men; yet they shun, reject and revile this state, and deem themselves so holy that they not only themselves avoid marriage — though they need it and ought to marry — but from excess of holiness they will not even attend a marriage, being much holier than Christ himself who as an unholy sinner attends a wedding.

4. Since then marriage has the foundation and consolation, that it is instituted by God and that God loves it, and that Christ himself so honors and comforts it, everybody ought to prize and esteem it, and the heart ought to be glad, that it is surely the state God loves and cheerfully endure every burden in it, even though the burdens be ten times heavier than they are. For this is the reason there is so much care and unpleasantness in marriage to the outward man, because everything that is God’s Word and work, if it is to be blessed at all, must be distasteful, bitter and burdensome to the outward man.

On this account marriage is a state that cultivates and exercises faith in God and love to our neighbor by means of manifold cares, labors, unpleasantnesses, crosses and all kinds of adversities, that are to follow everything that is God’s Word and work. All this the chaste whoremongers, saintly effeminates and Sodomites nicely escape, serving God outside of God’s ordinance by doings of their own.

5. For this is what Christ also indicates by his readiness to supply any want arising in marriage, bestowing wine where it is needed, and making it of water; as though he would say: Must you drink water, that is, suffer affliction outwardly, and is this distasteful? Very well, I will sweeten it for you and change the water into wine, so that your affliction will be your joy and delight. I will not do this by taking the water away or having it poured out; it shall remain, yea, I will have it poured in and the vessels filled up to the brim. For I will not deprive Christian marriage of its cares and trials, but rather add to it. The thing shall be wondrous, so that none, except they themselves who experience it, shall understand it. It shall be on this wise: 6. God’s Word shall do it, by which all things are made, preserved and transformed; that Word which turns your water into wine, and distasteful marriage into delight. That God has instituted marriage ( Genesis 2:32) the heathen and unbelievers do not know, therefore their water remains water and never becomes wine; for they feel not God’s pleasure and delight in married life, which if they did feel they would experience such delight in my pleasure as not to feel the half of their affliction, feeling it outwardly only, but inwardly not at all. And this would be the way to turn water into wine, mixing my pleasure with your displeasure and placing the one against the other, so that my pleasure would drown your displeasure, and turn it into pleasure; but this pleasure of mine nothing will reveal and give to you except my Word, Genesis 1:31: “God saw everything that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.”

7. Here too Christ indicates that he is not displeased with a marriage feast, nor with the things belonging to a wedding such as adornments, cheerfulness, eating and drinking, according to the usage and custom of the country; which appear to be superfluous and needless expense and a worldly matter; only so far as these things are used in moderation and in keeping with a marriage. For the bride and groom must be adorned; so also the guests must eat and drink to be cheerful. And such dining and doing may all be done in good conscience; for the Scriptures occasionally report the like, even the Gospel lessons mentioning bridal adornment, the wedding garment, guests and feastings at weddings. Thus Abraham’s servant in Genesis 24:53 presents ornaments of gold and silver to Rebecca, the bride of Isaac, and to her brothers; so that in these things no one need pay attention to the sour-visaged hypocrites and self-constituted saints who are pleased with nothing but what they themselves do and teach, and will not suffer a maid to wear a wreath or to adorn herself at all.

8. God is not concerned about such external things, if only faith and love reign; provided, as already stated, it be in moderation and in accord with each person’s station. For this marriage, although it was poor and small, had three tables; which is indicated by the word Architriclinus, showing that the ruler of the feast had three tables to provide for; moreover, the groom did not himself attend to this office, but had servants; then too there was wine to drink; all of which, if poverty were to be urged, might have been dispensed with, as is frequently the case with us. So also the guests did not merely quench their thirst with the wine; for the ruler of the feast speaks of how the good wine ought first to be set on, then, when men have freely drunk, that which is worse.

All this Christ allows to pass, and we likewise should let it pass and not make it a matter of conscience. They were not of the devil, even if a few drank of the wine a little beyond what thirst required, and became merry; else you would have to blame Christ for being the cause by means of his presence, and his mother by asking for it; so that both Christ and his mother are sinners in this if the sour-visaged saints are to render judgment.

9. But the excess customary in our times is a different thing, where men do not eat and drink but gorge themselves with food and drink, revel and carouse, and act as though it were a sign of skill or strength to consume overmuch: where, moreover, the intention is not to be merry, but to be full and crazy. But these are swine, not men; to such Christ would not give wine, nor would he visit them. So also in the matter of dress, it is not the marriage that is kept in mind, but display and pomp; as though the most admirable were those most able to wear gold, silver and pearls, and to spoil much silk and broadcloth, which even asses might do and switches.

10. What then is moderation? Reason should teach that, and cite examples from other countries and cities where such pomp and excess are unknown.

But to give my opinion, I would say a farmer is well adorned if for his wedding he have clothes twice as fine as he daily wears at his work; a burgher likewise; and a nobleman, if he have garments twice as costly as a townsman; a count, twice as costly as a nobleman; a duke, twice as costly as a count, and so in due order. In like manner food and drink and the entertainment of guests should be governed by their social position, and the purpose of the table should be pleasure not debauchery.

11. Now is it a sin to play and dance at a wedding, inasmuch as some declare great sin is caused by dancing? Whether the Jews had dances I do not know; but since it is the custom of the country, like inviting guests, decorating, eating and drinking and being merry, I see no reason to condemn it, save its excess when it goes beyond decency and moderation.

That sin should be committed is not the fault of dancing alone; since at a table or in church that may happen; even as it is not the fault of eating that some while so engaged should turn themselves into swine. Where things are decently conducted I will not interfere with the marriage rites and customs, and dance and never mind. Faith and love cannot be driven away either by dancing or by sitting still, as long as you keep to decency and moderation. Young children certainly dance without sin; do the same also, and be a child, then dancing will not harm you. Otherwise were dancing a sin in itself, children should not be allowed to dance. This is sufficient concerning marriage.

II. THE DOCTRINE AND EXAMPLE OF LOVE AND OF FAITH.

12. In the second place, to return to. our Gospel lesson, we here see the example of love in Christ and his mother. The mother renders service and takes the part of house-keeper: Christ honors the occasion by his personal presence, by a miracle and a gift. And all this is for the benefit of the groom, the bride and the guests, as is the nature of love and its works.

Thus Christ lures all hearts to himself, to rely on him as ever ready to help, even in temporal things, and never willing to forsake any; so that all who believe in him shall not suffer want, be it in spiritual or temporal things; rather must water become wine, and every creature turned into the thing his believer needs. He who believes must have sufficient, and no one can prevent it.

13. But the example of faith is still more wonderful in this Gospel. Christ waits to the very last moment when the want is felt by all present, and there is no counsel or help left. This shows the way of divine grace; it is not imparted to one who still has enough, and has not yet felt his need. For grace does not feed the full and satiated, but the hungry, as we have often said. Whoever still deems himself wise, strong and pious, and finds something good in himself, and is not yet a poor, miserable, sick sinner and fool, the same cannot come to Christ the Lord, nor receive his grace.

14. But whenever the need is felt, he does not at once hasten and bestow what is needed and desired, but delays and tests our faith and trust, even as he does here; yea, what is still more severe, he acts as though he would not help at all, but speaks with harshness and austerity. This you observe in the case of his mother. She feels the need and tells him of it, desiring his help and counsel in a humble and polite request. For she does not say: My dear son, furnish us wine; but: “They have no wine.” Thus she merely touches his kindness, of which she is fully assured. As though she would say: He is so good and gracious, there is no need of my asking, I will only tell him what is lacking, and he will of his own accord do more than one could ask.

This is the way of faith, it pictures God’s goodness to itself in this manner, never doubting but that it is really so; therefore it makes bold to bring its petition and to present its need.

15. But see, how unkindly he turns away the humble request of his mother who addresses him with such great confidence. Now observe the nature of faith. What has it to rely on? Absolutely nothing, all is darkness. It feels its need and sees help nowhere; in addition, God turns against it like a stranger and does not recognize it, so that absolutely nothing is left. It is the same way with our conscience when we feel our sin and the lack of righteousness; or in the agony of death when we feel the lack of life; or in the dread of hell when eternal salvation seems to have left us. Then indeed there is humble longing and knocking, prayer and search, in order to be rid of sin, death and dread. And then he acts as if he had only begun to show us our sins, as if death were to continue, and hell never to cease. Just as he here treats his mother, by his refusal making the need greater and more distressing than it was before she came to him with her request; for now it seems everything is lost, since the one support on which she relied in her need is also gone.

16. This is where faith stands in the heat of battle. Now observe how his mother acts and here becomes our teacher. However harsh his words sound, however unkind he appears, she does not in her heart interpret this as anger, or as the opposite of kindness, but adheres firmly to the conviction that he is kind, refusing to give up this opinion because of the thrust she received, and unwilling to dishonor him in her heart by thinking him to be otherwise than kind and gracious-as they do who are without faith, who fall back at the first shock and think of God merely according to what they feel, like the horse and the mule, Psalm 32:9. For if Christ’s mother had allowed those harsh words to frighten her she would have gone away silently and displeased; but in ordering the servants to do what he might tell them she proves that she has overcome the rebuff and still expects of him nothing but kindness.

17. What do you think of the hellish blow, when a man in his distress, especially in the highest distress of conscience, receives the rebuff, that he feels God declaring to him: “What have I to do with thee?” Quid mihi et tibi? He must needs faint and despair, unless he knows and understands the nature of such acts of God, and is experienced in faith. For he will act just as he feels, and will not think of God in a different way and mean the words. Feeling nothing but wrath and hearing nothing but indignation, he will consider God only as his enemy and angry judge. But just as he thinks God to be so will he find him. Thus he will expect nothing good from him.

That is to renounce God with all his goodness. The result is that he flees and hates him, and will not have God to be God; and every other blasphemy that is the fruit of unbelief.

18. Hence the highest thought in this Gospel lesson, and it must ever be kept in mind, is, that we honor God as being good and gracious, even if he acts and speaks otherwise, and all our understanding and feeling be otherwise., For in this way feeling is killed, and the old man perishes, so that nothing but faith in God’s goodness remains, and no feeling. For here you see how his mother retains a free faith and holds it forth as an example to us. She is certain that he will be gracious, although she does not feel it.

She is certain also that she feels otherwise than she believes. Therefore she freely leaves and commends all to his goodness, and fixes for him neither time nor place, neither manner nor measure, neither person nor name. He is to act when it pleases him. If not in the midst of the feast, then at the end of it, or after the feast. My defeat I will swallow, his scorning me, letting me stand in disgrace before all the guests, speaking so unkindly to me, causing us all to blush for shame. He acts tart, but he is sweet I know. Let us proceed in the same way, then we are true Christians.

19. Here note how severely he deals with his own mother, teaching us thereby not only the example of faith mentioned above, but confirming that in things pertaining to God and his service we are to know neither father nor mother, as Moses writes in Deuteronomy 33:9: “He who says of his father and of his mother, I know them not, observes thy Word, Israel.” For although there is no higher authority on earth than that of father and mother, still this ends when God’s Word and work begin. For in divine things neither father nor mother, still less, a bishop or any other person, only God’s Word is to teach and guide. And if father and mother were to order, teach, or even beg you to do anything for God, and in his service that he has not clearly ordered and commanded, you are to reply: Quid mihi et tibi? What have I and you to do with each other? In this same way Chris there refuses absolutely to do God’s work when his own mother wants it.

20. For father and mother are in duty bound, yea, God made them father and mother for this very purpose, not to teach and lead their children to God according to their own notions and devotion, but according to God’s command; as St. Paul declares in Ephesians 6:4: “Ye fathers; provoke not your children to wrath: but nurture them in the chastening and admonition of the Lord;” i.e. teach them God’s command and Word, as you were taught, and not notions of your own.

Thus in this Gospel lesson you see the mother of Christ directing the servants away from herself unto Christ, telling them not: Whatsoever I say unto you, do it; but: “Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.” To this Word alone you must direct everyone, if you would direct aright; so that this word of Mary (whatsoever he saith, do it) is, and ought to be, a daily saying in Christendom, destroying all doctrines of men and everything not really Christ’s Word. And we ought firmly to believe that what is imposed upon us over and above God’s Word is not, as they boast and lie, the commandment of the church. For Mary says: Whatsoever he saith that, that, that do, and that alone; for in it there will be enough to do.

21. Here also you see, how faith does not fail, God does not permit that, but gives more abundantly and gloriously than we ask. For here not merely wine is given, but excellent and good wine, and a great quantity of it. By this he again entices and allures us to believe confidently in him, though he delay. For he is truthful and cannot deny himself; he is good and gracious, that he must of himself confess and in addition prove it, unless we hinder him and refuse him time and place and the means to do so. At last he cannot forsake his work, as little as he can forsake himself — if only we can hold out until his hour comes.

III. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS MARRIAGE.

22. In the third place, we must briefly touch upon the spiritual significance of the text. This marriage and every marriage signifies Christ, the true bridegroom, and Christendom, the bride; as the Gospel lesson of Matthew 22:1-14 sufficiently shows.

23. This marriage took place in Cana of Galilee; that is, Christendom began in the days of Christ among the Jewish people, and continues still among all who are like the Jews. The Jewish nation is called Cana, which signifies, zeal, because it diligently practiced the Law and zealously clung to the works of the Law, so that even the Gospel lessons always call the Jews zealots, and especially St. Paul in Romans 9 and Romans 10. It is natural too that wherever Law and good works are, there zeal will be and contention, one claiming to be better than the other, first of all, however, opposing faith which cares naught for works and boasts only of God’s grace. Now wherever Christ is there such zealots will always be, and his marriage must be at Zeal City, for you always find by the side of the Gospel and faith work-righteous people and Jewish zealots who quarrel with faith.

24. Galilee signifies border or the edge of the country, where you pass from one country into another. This signifies the same people in Zeal City who dwell between the Law and the Gospel, and ought to emigrate and pass from works to faith, from the Law into the Christian liberty; as some also have done, and now still do. But the greater part remain in their works and dwell on the border, achieving neither good works nor faith, shielding themselves behind the shine and glitter of works.

25. Christ’s being bidden to the marriage signifies that he was promised long ago in the Law and the prophets and is earnestly expected and invoked to turn water into wine, fulfill the Law and establish faith, and make true GalileansOF US.

26. His disciples are bidden with him; for he is expected to be a great King, hence to need apostles and disciples in order to have his Word freely and fully preached everywhere. Likewise, his mother is the Christian church, taken from the Jews, who herself most of all belongs to the marriage, for Christ was really promised to the Jewish nation.

27. The six waterpots of stone, for the purification of the Jews, are the books of the Old Testament which by law and commandment made the Jewish people only outwardly pious and pure; for which reason the Evangelist says, they were set there after the Jews’ manner of purifying, as if to say: This signifies the purification by works without faith, which never purifies the heart, but only makes it more impure; which is a Jewish, not a Christian or spiritual purification.

28. There being six waterpots signifies the labor and toil which they who deal in works undergo in such purification; for the heart finds no rest in them, since the Sabbath, the seventh day, is wanting, in which we rest from our works and let God work in us. For there are six work-days, in which God created heaven and earth, and commanded us to labor. The seventh day is the day of rest, in which we are not to toil in the works of the Law, but to let God work in us by faith, while we remain quiet and enjoy a holiday from the labors of the Law.

29. The water in the pots is the contents and substance of the Law by which conscience is governed, and is graven in letters as in the waterpots of stone.

30. And they are of stone, as were the tables of Moses, signifying the stiffnecked people of the Jews. For as their heart is set against the Law, so the Law appears outwardly to be against them. It seems hard and difficult to them, and therefore it is hard and difficult; the reason in that their heart is hard and averse to the Law; we all find, feel and discover by experience that we are hard and averse to what is good, and soft and prone to what is evil. This the wicked do not feel, but those who long to be pious and labor exceedingly with their works. This is the significance of the two or three firkins apiece.

31. To turn water into wine is to render the interpretation of the Law delightful. This is done as follows: Before the Gospel arrives everyone understands the Law as demanding our works, that we must fulfill it with works of our own. This interpretation begets either hardened, presumptuous dissemblers and hypocrites, harder than any pot of stone, or timid, restless consciences. There remains nothing but water in the pot, fear and dread of God’s Judgment. This is the water-interpretation, not intended for drinking, neither filling any with delight; on the contrary, there is nothing to it but washing and purification, and yet no true inner cleansing. But the Gospel explains the Law, showing that it requires more than we can render, and that it demands a person different from ourselves to fulfill it; that is, it demands Christ and brings us unto him, so that first of all by his grace we are made in true faith a different people like unto Christ, and that then we do truly good works. Thus the right interpretation and significance of the law is to lead us to the knowledge of our helplessness, to drive us from ourselves to another, namely to Christ, to seek grace and help of him.

32. Therefore, when Christ wanted to make wine he had them pour in still more water, up to the very brim. For the Gospel comes and renders the interpretation of the Law perfectly clear (as already stated), showing that what belongs to us is nothing but sin; wherefore by the law we cannot escape sinning. When now the two or three firkins hear this, namely the good hearts who have labored according to the law in good works, and are already timid at heart and troubled in conscience, this interpretation adds greatly to their fear and terror; and the water now threatens to rise above the lid and brim. Before this, while they felt disinclined and averse to what is good, they still imagined they might yet succeed by their good works; now they hear that they are altogether unfit and helpless:, and that it is impossible to gain their end by good works. That overfills the pot with water, it cannot hold more. This is to interpret the Law in the highest manner, leaving nothing but despair.

33. Then comes the consoling Gospel and turns the water into wine. For when the heart hears that Christ fulfills the law for us and takes our sin upon himself, it no longer cares that impossible things are demanded by the Law, that we must despair of rendering them, and must give up our good works. Yea, it is an excellent thing, and delectable, that the Law is so deep and high, so holy and righteous and good, and demands things so great; and it is loved and lauded for making so many and such great demands.

This is because the heart now has in Christ all that the Law demands, and it would be sorry indeed if it demanded less. Behold, thus the Law is delightful now and easy which before was disagreeable, difficult and impossible; for it lives in the heart by the Spirit. Water no longer is in the pots, it has turned to wine, it is passed to the guest, it is consumed, and has made the heart glad.

34. And these servants are all preachers of the New Testament like the apostles and their successors.

35. The drawing and passing to the guests is, to take this interpretation from the Scriptures, and to preach it to all the world, which is bidden to Christ’s marriage.

36. And these servants knew (the Evangelist tells us) whence the wine was, how it had been water. For the apostles and their successors alone understand how the law becomes delightful and pleasant through Christ, and how the Gospel by faith does not fulfill the Law by works, every thing being unchanged from what it formerly was in good works.

37. But the ruler of the feast does indeed taste that the wine is good, yet he knows not whence it is. This ruler of the feast is the old priesthood among the Jews who knew of naught but works, of whom Nicodemus was one, John 3:9; he indeed feels how fine this cause of Christ would be, but knows not how it can be, and why it is so, clinging still to works. For they who teach works cannot understand and apprehend the Gospel and the actions of faith.

38. He calleth the bridegroom and reproacheth him for setting on the good wine last, whereas every man setteth on last that which is worse. To this very day it is the surprise of the Jews that the preaching of the Gospel should have been delayed so long, coming first of all now to the Gentiles, while they are said to have been drinking the worse wine for so long a time, bearing so long the burden and heat of the day under the Law; as is set forth in another Gospel lesson. Matthew 20:12.

39. Observe, God and men proceed in contrary ways. Men set on first that which is best, afterward that which is worse. God first gives the cross and affliction, then honor and blessedness. This is because men seek to preserve the old man; on which account they instruct us to keep the Law by works, and offer promises great and sweet. But the out-come is stale, the result has a vile taste; for the longer it goes on the worse is the condition of conscience, although, being intoxicated with great promises, it does not feel its wretchedness; yet at last when the wine is digested, and the false promises gone, the wretchedness appears. But God first of all terrifies the conscience, sets on miserable wine, in fact nothing but water; then, however, he consoles us with the promises of the Gospel which endure forever.

The Second Sunday after the Epiphany. Changing Water into Wine. John 2:1-11

$
0
0
http://www.normaboecklerart.com



The Second Sunday after the Epiphany, 2013

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn #39     Praise to the Lord                  3.1
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 370            My Hope Is Built            3.11

Demonstration of the Word's Power

The Hymn #128            Brightest and Best              3:29
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #309   O Jesus, Blessed Lord            3.70

KJV Romans 12:6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith; 7 Or ministry, let us wait on ourministering: or he that teacheth, on teaching; 8 Or he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness. 9 Letlove be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. 10 Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another; 11 Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit; serving the Lord; 12 Rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation; continuing instant in prayer; 13 Distributing to the necessity of saints; given to hospitality. 14 Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not. 15 Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep. 16 Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own conceits.

KJV John 2:1 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: 2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. 3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine. 4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. 5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it. 6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. 7 Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. 8 And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it. 9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, 10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. 11 This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory; and his disciples believed on him.

SECOND SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY

Lord God, heavenly Father, we thank Thee, that of Thy grace Thou hast instituted holy matrimony, in which Thou keepest us from unchastity, and other offenses: We beseech Thee to send Thy blessing upon every husband and wife, that they may not provoke each other to anger and strife, but live peaceably together in love and godliness, receive Thy gracious help in all temptations, and rear their children in accordance with Thy will; grant unto us all to walk before Thee, in purity and holiness, to put all our trust in Thee, and lead such lives on earth, that in the world to come we may have everlasting life, through the same, Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.



Demonstration of the Word's Power
KJV John 2:1 And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee; and the mother of Jesus was there: 2 And both Jesus was called, and his disciples, to the marriage. 

There are two main themes in this Gospel. One is the power and extent of God's Word, and the other is God's blessing of Christian marriage.

We are now in the third phase of pagan attitudes toward marriage. 

Marriage paganism - first phase. Around the time of Christ, there was a pagan attitude toward women as the source of all evil in the world, so marriage was bad too. This came to influence the Church with monks and nuns, but that took some time. The apostles were married but in time (St. Augustine) priests were no longer married.

Second phase of paganism - In Luther's time, he observed that the Christian Church of his day despised marriage and had priests who would not sully themselves by attending a marriage. The single life was more holy, and that was the only way to have a church vocation. This was not entirely honest, since many priests were secretly married and even paid a marriage tax to the pope. But as we see with today, reality is not as important as the impression, the posturing. Marriage was bad and women were evil.

Today is the third phase of paganism. People get married, but it is considered a curse and something to be avoided by men and women. Marriage was re-defined some time ago, when corporations began recognizing "partners" as married and giving them benefits. Now the Supreme Court will make it official nation-wide, in spite of Congress' Protection of Marriage Act years ago and all the state-wide votes.

So marriage now, when it happens, is turned into a joke where extravagance is the key and the union really means almost nothing.

But in this lesson, marriage is blessed by God, because Jesus attended with His disciples and His mother. No mention is made of Joseph, so it is assumed that Joseph had died by that time. 
And we can tell this was a simple marriage between two people with few relatives. That is why Mary is in charge and taking responsibility for the details. We have to assume that the couple had no living relatives and that their financial resources were limited.

They ran out of wine, and that was like inviting people to dinner with no food, no plates, no silverware. In other words, it was unthinkable and embarrassing to the couple. 



3 And when they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.

Mary's supervisory role is revealed in her statement to Jesus. She takes on the responsibility of relaying the problem to her Son and then gives orders to the servants. This is similar to a prayer. She expressed the need to Jesus.

4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with thee? mine hour is not yet come. 5 His mother saith unto the servants, Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it.

Jesus' response comes across so cool, even harsh, that some translators make this address to be "dear woman," but that is not what the text says. In John's Gospel, Jesus addressed his mother twice as "woman" because He was and is her Lord. Likewise, in the Temple, He did not apologize to His mother and Joseph, but told them about the necessity of being there.

Mary's response is one of complete trust. She knew what He could do and did not show any hesitancy in facilitating the solution. So this is a lesson for all believers in similar circumstances. When God's response to prayer seems chilly, we should persist in being trusting. God can accomplish anything in a moment and never wavers in His concern for us.

I keep wondering why people accept the synod as their god, having all power over their lives. Instead of trusting the Word of God, they trust the word of man will get them the answers they need, if they complain on Facebook or on blogs.

Jesus responded by performing His first miracle.
6 And there were set there six waterpots of stone, after the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three firkins apiece. 7 Jesus saith unto them, Fill the waterpots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. 8 And he saith unto them, Draw out now, and bear unto the governor of the feast. And they bare it.

Jesus turned water into the best wine by His Word alone. He did not touch the water, the pots, or the wine. This demonstration is extremely important for us, because too many people put the emphasis on proximity. The Roman officer knew better and provided a good lesson. He could give orders and know they would be obeyed. Likewise, he knew that Jesus could command the elements the same way and heal his servant. Jesus did not need to travel and speak the Word over the servant, or touch him. The Word of God has infinite reach.

I was disappointed that clergy thought a Holy Communion service had to be limited to a room, a church, building. The Word of God is effective when spoken, heard, remembered, or read. The Word consecrates the elements. If that were not so, then the sermon would not be a sermon when broadcast or shared by videotape. 

People have begun to concede that the church of the future will have to be like ours, because it is the one way to reach most people, in spite of distance, weather, etc.

This shows how God's Word, beyond anyone's imagination can turn one element into another. Thus God can pronounce a believe righteous through faith in Him. That is greater transformation than water into wine.

9 When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine, and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom, 10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. 

This water turned into wine was so good that the master of ceremonies chided the groom for holding back the best wine, which should have been distributed first. So we not only have a demonstration of the power of the Word, but also the implied application of that power.

Marriage is like ordinary water in the eyes of the world. It is often seen as necessity, such as when people unite two wealthy families in a legal bond. Or two warring Mafia factions. Brides have been used as property to earn wealth for a family with a title and no money, or to earn a title for a family with wealth and no titles.

People despise marriage because it brings obligations, work, difficulties, while limiting freedom. So the unbelieving world sees only water, not wine. If anyone suggests wine, they point out only the dregs.

Faith in Christ transforms marriage, so that even the difficulties are remembered with advantages, as Shakespeare said of St. Krispin's Day. Mothers feel dragged down by the demands of infants but remember all the special moments. Fathers recall the messes and the noise, but when will anyone else listen with such interest and learn so much? It even gets repeated back with thanks many years later.

People want to "make a difference" but there is no greater difference made than being good parents. No other school has such diligent students. To add young adults to society with so much spiritual wisdom is a great accomplishment. Like parental advice, this bears fruit over time.


Luther:
33. Then comes the consoling Gospel and turns the water into wine. For when the heart hears that Christ fulfills the law for us and takes our sin upon himself, it no longer cares that impossible things are demanded by the Law, that we must despair of rendering them, and must give up our good works. Yea, it is an excellent thing, and delectable, that the Law is so deep and high, so holy and righteous and good, and demands things so great; and it is loved and lauded for making so many and such great demands.

This is because the heart now has in Christ all that the Law demands, and it would be sorry indeed if it demanded less. Behold, thus the Law is delightful now and easy which before was disagreeable, difficult and impossible; for it lives in the heart by the Spirit. Water no longer is in the pots, it has turned to wine, it is passed to the guest, it is consumed, and has made the heart glad.

Discussions Are Not Symmetrical in WELS

$
0
0
It's never too young to begin
despising the Means of Grace.
Martin Luther College, Early Childhood Education


WELS Discussions

Joe Jewell There's a real asymmetry there though, Seth Bode, in that one side (the side that wishes to defend anything with the label "WELS", no matter how aberrant the practice) risks no censure whatsoever for using their real names, whereas the other side certainly does. It is a very "cheap" courage that allows a Synod Firster to toss brickbats at those who are skeptical of the latest Chuch'n'Change innovation or the latest liturgical invention. He risks nothing in so doing, and may well win plaudits from his DP.

But there are real consequences to pay for speaking certain truths from the "wrong" position; e.g. a seminary professor who was a member of the TEC told a roomful of around 100 of my brothers that I was "misleading them" in quoting verbatim from a document (which at first he claimed did not even exist, until he realized that I had a copy of the same in front of me on my laptop!) wherein the LCMS criticized and subsequently rejected the NIV2011. That President Schroeder quoted precisely the same lines from precisely the same document about 9 months later in his pastoral letter to the synod is of no consequence, I suppose--he was in the "right" position (though his view was marginalized anyway), which is all that matters sometimes. (This attitude of alethic relativism, by the way, is endemic, likely stems in part from the functional Arminianism which is now rampant among those who wish to dispose of our Lutheran heritage, and is--I think--what resulted in the NIV2011 even having a chance in the WELS, essentially alone among those denominations professing a belief in verbal inspiration).

I don't pretend that's especially severe, mind you, to be falsely accused of all but lying by a man with a microphone and a position of authority. But then, I'm a scientist, not a pastor. If the opinion of one influential sem prof were enough to derail my ministry or my family's livelihood (as it certainly could potentially be), I would have thought twice about speaking my mind, and maybe chosen to make my comments in an anonymous internet forum instead. As many have. Do I wish they were public? Yes. But can I blame them? No.


Church and Changers have DP protections - ask Jeff Gunn.
Justification by faith...walks.


Let's teach children to put women's makeup
on the pastor and council members at Redeemer (WELS) in Tucson.


***

GJ - I was thinking of one incident. I was invited to speak to the some pastors from the Michigan District - Northern Conference, I recall. I mentioned Paul Kelm endorsing, in writing, a Kent Hunter Church Growth program.

Frosty Bivens immediately rose up to accuse me of slandering Paul Kelm's "good name."

Right away, someone asked, "Do you have proof?" I did not thing it was a big deal. I wondered why they implied that I was making it up. But that is the style of liars.

I had the brochure in my briefcase, and I produced it. Next, "How do we know that Kelm was actually quoted?" I guess Kent Hunter was now a liar.

Later on I spoke with Hunter and he confirmed: a) He asked for the endorsement from Kelm; b) Kelm willingly supplied it.

Anyone who thinks he can have any impact on these adulterous drunks is fooling himself. They have used these tactics successfully for decades and will not change until they pull the walls of their cesspool down around their ears.


Wearing your Mark Jeske button
will make you invulnerable to all criticism,
no matter how incompetent you are
in covering up the incompetence of other Jeske disciples.



Ego absolvo me. Episcopal Bishop Absolves Himself in the DUI-Texting Killing of a Father of Two Young Children

$
0
0
The Right Reverend Bishop Eugene Taylor Sutton:
Ego absolvo me - I absolve myself of all guilt.

Bishop Cook had about 12 drinks and was texting when she ran down Thomas Palermo.
She hid in her gated community but another biker found her and forced her to return,
about 45 minutes later.

Maryland Episcopal Bishop Absolves Himself in Fellow Bishop’s Hit-n-Run Death of Cyclist
By David W. Virtue DD
www.virtueonline.org
January 15, 2015

The Bishop of Maryland, the Rt. Rev. Eugene Taylor Sutton, has written a Pastoral Letter to the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland absolving himself of being complicit in the hiring of Heather Cook (Suffragan Bishop) by not revealing her true background to the Standing Committee.
Bishop Sutton revealed that he heard from an unnamed bishop saying that Cook’s fatal hit-and-run crash was “not your fault.” Really.
Sutton wrote that he cried when he read the words even though he knew about Cook’s 2010 drunk driving arrest. That conviction revealed she couldn't complete a sobriety test and was just "one mistake." Church officials also said Cook didn't have a problem with the bottle prior to her elevation to the second-highest ranking position in the Diocese of Maryland last spring. Now we know that was not true.
With Bishop Heather Cook in a Baltimore jail cell on charges of manslaughter, drunk driving, and leaving the scene of an accident, the man who presided during her hiring says he didn’t realize how burdened he was by the incident until “a bishop colleague” spoke with him.
Sutton acknowledged to diocesan officials that he knew about Cook’s 2010 drunk driving and drug arrest, but did not disclose it to the people who elected her. He now believes he can draw comfort from his colleague’s words of solace, he wrote in his “pastoral letter”.
“Eugene, I am the child of an alcoholic and I’ve spent many years dealing with that and coming to understand the hold that alcohol has on someone who is addicted to it,” the colleague counseled, according to Sutton’s account.
“I want to tell you that the Diocese of Maryland is not responsible for the terrible accident that killed that bicyclist,” the colleague added, according to Sutton’s letter. “You are not responsible for that; Heather Cook is. It’s not your fault.”
Sutton goes on to say the colleague’s words prompted him to “burst into tears.”
“I hadn’t realized how much I had internalized the weight of responsibility for the tragedy, the sense of shame, and the desperate need to make it all better,” Sutton wrote in the letter that was posted on his Facebook page as well as on the website of the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland.
So the spin begins.
He counsels readers of the letter to think before they act. “In a time of great upheaval, things said, decided upon and done in haste are rarely the most helpful over the long run,” he notes.
Not to be defensive is also recommended, with the bishop writing that “being vulnerable is better than being defensive.” He includes quotes from St. Paul’s Second Letter to the Corinthians and from the philosopher Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
“Later, praying before the Icon of Christ the Pantocrater, I gazed into those piercing eyes of our Lord, asking: What is Christ wanting to say to me? And what did I want to say to him?
“After what seemed like an eternity, I was finally able to gaze into his eyes and say: ‘Lord, it’s not your fault,’” he recounts.
So Sutton feels no responsibility for smoothing the way for Cook to the episcopacy in the name of a false compassion, the sort of phony compassion that allowed John Shelby Spong and Walter Righter to stay in power long after their heresies and apostasies were exposed, long after Gene Robinson’s acknowledged homosexuality, his divorce from his first wife, marriage and divorce to a man, and his own acknowledged alcoholism! It allowed a bishop like Charles Bennison to stay in office even though he said Jesus was a sinner who forgave himself!
So with no Biblical principles to guide them, dioceses elect the lowest candidate they can find in the name of “compassion” because a number of those voting are themselves recovering alcoholics. Cook had not done one notable thing to make her electable. Not one. She had never planted a church, never talked about leading people to Christ, and was, by all accounts, living with her new/old boyfriend when she struck and killed Tom Palermo. Was she ever asked if she was engaged in fornication or is that now off limits because The Episcopal Church acknowledges “that there are currently couples in the Body of Christ and in this Church who are living in marriage and couples in the Body of Christ and in this Church who are living in other life-long committed relationships….(D039).” Wink wink…
In the end we will be told that nobody is to blame. The spin will continue. Sooner or later, we will be told that Cook just couldn’t help herself, she was born with an alcohol gene which was not her fault, that she tried to get her drinking under control, but couldn’t so why should we blame her. She is a victim of her own genes.
In the meantime, Mrs. Palermo must raise two kids alone without a husband and father because Cook killed her husband, left the scene of the accident, and is now languishing in jail with a $2.5 million bail that a judge had the good sense to make so high because she might recommit. This will keep her in jail till her trial maybe in February. If she is found guilty, she could pay a $50,000 fine and do 5-10 years.
The Presiding Bishop may (or may not) exercise Title IV to finally get rid of her; with all the negative publicity globally, she might have no option. Or she can wait till the whole affair dies down and just let it ride. Don’t put it past the PB to do that. It is easier to get rid of an adulterous heterosexual bishop than to rid the church of theologically heretical bishops or a bishop who drives under the influence and kills someone.
Who among the bishops in The Episcopal Church believes in St. Paul’s words any more?
Meantime Bishop Sutton can feel good about himself because he has absolved himself - Je me absous.
END

Which Lutheran Seminary?

$
0
0


Someone has been asking me about which Lutheran seminary to attend. The synods project a mirage glimmering on the horizon. Surely with their approval, the candidate who does all his work will have a call and serve in the Kingdom!

Just the opposite is true. The synod school will grab all the money and  force someone out, leaving him with a mountain of student debt and a useless degree. "But," some object, "What if I graduate and get a call?" That is no better. The DPs are eager to wipe out new pastors to make room for the next herd to be slaughtered.

WELS and the Little Sect are known for this, but so is the LCMS. Just remember - an MDiv from a synod school is a worthless degree, although one at the same price from a divinity school could be valuable. Yale Divinity School graduates are known for not serving congregations after graduation, but doing many other things instead - graduate school in Asian literature, social work, business school, doctoral degrees in theology.

Any Lutheran MDiv is equal to the rest, so a cheaper degree from a Pietistic school or Canadian one is a better deal than St. Louis, Ft. Wayne, the Sausage Factory, or the Little Schoolhouse on the Prairie. Whether someone serves a parish is a gamble, no matter what. The origin of the degree seems immaterial, since the synodicals have no qualms about brutalizing their own graduates, pastors, and teachers.

Let the buyer beware, or as Jesus said, "Count the cost first."



St. Ignatius
Someone has asked me about the ELDONA seminary start-up, St. Ignatius. The total cost is very low, and the pastors in that group are the most intellectual of the Lutheran entities I know.

ELDONA is the only organized Lutheran group to teach justification by faith and reject Universal Objective Justification (aka Universalism).

Book about St. Ignatius.

A Blessed St. Ignatius Day from St. Ignatius Lutheran Theological Seminary!

The world continues to ask the devil’s question, “Has God indeed said…?” By the power of God’s Holy Spirit the Church continues to answer the world with boldness and clarity as it faithfully believes, teaches, and confesses all that Christ Jesus has taught in the Holy Scriptures. St. Ignatius Lutheran Theological Seminary is established for the very purpose of this holy work. The Church must continue to train men in the Word so they may faithfully give the divine gifts of the Gospel and the Sacraments to all nations, for all generations to come until Christ comes again in glory.

The Evangelical Lutheran Diocese of North America (ELDoNA) is currently accepting applications for enrollment for St. Ignatius Seminary Here candidates for the pastorate will be trained to hold fast to all that Christ has taught the Church. They will be taught to rely on the Word of God, to apply the faithful teachings of the Lutheran Confessions, and to observe the historical practices of the one holy, Christian and apostolic Church that proclaim God’s truth. They will be equipped so that they may be worthy candidates for Christ’s Holy Office of the Ministry, rather than being timid hirelings or those who are conformed to the world.

St. Ignatius Seminary is named for Saint Ignatius of Antioch, who is remembered for his faithful contributions to teaching doctrine and practice in the Church. The example of this bishop and martyr is a valuable asset to the Church as he exemplified both wisdom and humility in Jesus Christ. (Please note, St. Ignatius is not to be confused with Ignatius of Loyola, who was canonized by the Roman church for waging war against the teachings of the Reformation.)

As the Augsburg Confession states, it is taught among us that we receive forgiveness and “become righteous before God by grace, for Christ's sake, through faith,” (AC IV) and that God has instituted His Holy Office through which He provides the preaching of the Gospel and the administering of the Sacraments, the gifts by which His Holy Spirit produces such faith. (AC V) St. Ignatius Seminary is founded on these teachings as it trains men for this office. 

For more information on St. Ignatius Lutheran Theological Seminary, please visit http://saintignatiusseminary.com Enrollment applications for the 2014/2015 school year are now being accepted. Contribution information is also available for those who would like to financially support this work, which endeavors to ensure the faithful preaching of life in Christ crucified to all who will hear.

***

GJ - If the idea is studying theology with believers who appreciate the scope of Christian theology, then St. Ignatius is a good idea and far less expensive than the Thrivent salesman farms. One also has to calculate lost income, which I why I went through college and seminary in six years, earning a new degree when my peers at seminary were still finishing (partying).

In this age of technology, there is nothing keeping a faithful man from serving a group and building a congregation. The mighty Episcopal Church has 50% of its priests in part-time calls, and they have a (failing) seminary with a $66 million endowment. Clearly, money and tradition are not the answers. I can only guess what their other failing seminaries have in the bank.

A Lutheran pastor can gather a congregation with blogging, Ustream broadcasting, visiting, etc. God will provide. The destruction of traditional Lutheran worship will certainly make a segment of the population eager to participate in Means of Grace liturgical services, which are now rarer than an honest DP.

I suggest:
1. Meeting with those who have direct experience with a given educational choice.
2. Looking at and preparing for alternative sources of income, not unlike Paul, who made tents to avoid burdening tiny congregations.
3. Comparing costs.

God will provide for faithful servants, and Satan will provide for the rest, so this is a win/win situation. 


Vines for the Hummingbirds and Butterflies. New Feeder and Job One for the Garden

$
0
0
Honeysuckle - Scentsation - Lonicera.
The time has come to try various vines. I know the trees will be trimmed to give more sunlight, so I have two living tree candidates, one dead tree (best of all for sun), and one baby tree. I have no idea what the last one is - one of those tall but useless plants that appear in untended yards.

I was tempted to saw it down, but then I saw the plant as a living trellis, much cheaper than buying one, much easier than building one.

The three best guesses are pictured here, and I ordered them. Trumpet vine was the easiest first choice. I have seen it growing and climbing. Everyone names it as a great hummingbird plant. I was looking for two others that grow well, make butterflies happy, and attract hummingbirds.

I like the baroque complexity of the Maypop flower. Honeysuckle vine has a good reputation for attracting birds and butterflies. In Phoenix we had a Honeysuckle bush that produced orange flowers and hummingbirds all the time, growing from a sprout to a 9 foot tall bush.

Diversified planting helps because blooms develop at different times and favored species like a variety of food.

Some others in this category (but not vines) are Butterfly Bush, Butterfly Weed, dill, Bee Balm, and various herbs like borage.  Queen Ann's Lace is officially a weed, but I like its dill-like flowers and appeal to bees.


Maypop or Passion Flower - Passiflora.

Trumpet Vine - Campsis.
Some of you fill hummingbird feeders. I grow them.

New Bird and Squirrel Feeder
I found a filing cabinet to replace the free one I got from LI. The pull out drawer struck me as a good device for bird and squirrel feeding. The top level keeps seed dry. The drawer tempts the squirrel inside for additional treats.

They took to the new feeder at once. Starlings, blue jays, and cardinals are happily feeding every morning, along with chickadees, doves, and some other species.

Peas - Plant for the Cold
The bulbs are not even peeking out of the soil yet, reason to plant snowflakes, snowdrops, or crocus, to build up gardening self-esteem.  But I did not, so I need to plant some peas. Rain will be coming but insects are not inclined to come out when nights are near freezing.

So I will plant peas today, God willing, and have a new set of plants to watch. At the very worst I will be adding nitrogen to the soil and softening it for beans, but I imagine it will be more like, "Do you want some peas?" Mrs. I "No! Not another pod until next year."





WELS Documented Blog - Matthew 18 and the Eighth Commandment

$
0
0


Monday, January 19, 2015


Matthew 18 and Rebuking Public Sins

Matthew 18:15-17 - (NIV)
15 “If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over. 16 But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.’ 17 If they still refuse to listen, tell it to the church; and if they refuse to listen even to the church, treat them as you would a pagan or a tax collector.



Private Sin

"If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over."– Matthew 18:15

In today’s passage, Jesus is speaking about the personal ministry which we have with and for other Christians.  When we see a Christian slip into sin and continue to live impenitently in that sin, Jesus wants us to do something about it.  Jesus' concern is not that we try to reform a fellow Christian's irritating habits or change his personality quirks.  He is speaking about living impenitently in a particular sin which defies the Word of God.  The word Jesus uses here for sin means "missing the mark."  The erring person has missed the mark of God's Word.  He or she is defying the will of God.  Can we dare to become apathetic about a person who is in danger of eternal separation from God?  Hardly!

Jesus says, “Go and show him his fault, just between the two of you.” Take the initiative. Don't wait for the person to come to you.  And go alone at first.  Keep the matter as private as possible.  Jesus doesn't want sin spread around.

When you have pointed out someone's sin, and he listens to you and agrees, then assure him that God forgives him and so do you.  Then be sure to leave the sin behind.  If not letting go of someone else's past and forgiven sins is something you struggle with, take this to God in prayer.  Ask your heavenly Father to help you forgive and forget the sin of others just as he has dealt with your sin through Christ.
 - Read the WELS Daily Devotion in it's entirety



Public Sin

Called Workers Who Commit Public Sin
Manitowoc Pastoral Conference, Zion, Morrison, WI, November 18, 1991
by Jonathan L. Rossman

[note: the discussion examples cited were not in the original paper] 

 “Called Workers Who Commit Public Sin” It might seem strange that we should talk about such a topic. Isn’t everything within the ivory towers of the church pure? Aren’t called workers more perfect than other people? Aren’t all their sins at least done only in private? Of course, the answer to all those questions is “no.” I don’t have to remind any of you that called workers do fall into public sin. Perhaps it has become so common that it doesn’t shock us as much as it used to, or as much as it should. Most of you have probably been involved in at least one case of a called worker who committed a public sin.

I have not been out in the ministry all that long. Yet in my short life, I’ve seen how the public sin of a called worker has affected four different congregations in one way or another. Perhaps there was a pastor who had a drinking problem or whose greed tempted him to steal from the church. Maybe there was a lady teacher who got pregnant outside of marriage or one who was not faithful to her calling. Possibly there was a male teacher charged with child abuse or one who promoted false doctrine among the lambs of Jesus’ flock. Called workers do fall into public sin, and it happens all too often.

...The focus of this paper is not on the private sin of called workers. Paul reminds us that “...all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God...” (Rom. 3:23) We aren’t called to peek inside bedroom windows. We aren’t called to turn over every rock in search of sin. We aren’t called to be spies sent on a mission of dredging up dirt on our brothers and sisters who are called into the ministry. God hasn’t called us to be the Reverend Sherlock Holmes. He has called us to preach the Gospel of Christ. Even though he hasn’t called us to search for sin, we aren’t called to ignore it either. 

When a sin is made public, it must be dealt with. For instance, you might know that a fellow pastor is having a marriage problem. This certainly won’t be dealt with in a public way, but when a divorce is filed then the sin becomes public.

[WELS Example: Likewise, if a pastor sexually harasses his secretary in his office, it would be a private sin; but then if HE chooses to file a restraining order against the victim's husband; would that not make it a public sin and open for public rebuke, as stated in the paragraph above? Why or Why Not?] 

A young teacher might sin against the sixth commandment in secret, but it becomes public where God blesses that sinful union with a child.

[WELS Example: If a pastor and a congregation choose to have a male beauty contest where the pastor and elders dress as women it would be a private matter; however if they then choose to post those pictures publicly on the Internet and in their newsletter which apparently caused offense to some; would that not make it a public issue then and open for discussion on the appropriateness of doing that in order to examine if the potential is there to cause offense? Why or Why Not?]

A teacher might have questions and doubts about certain doctrines, but when he publicly and persistently proclaims false doctrine we must deal with it.

[WELS Example: If WELS promotes a publicly advertised conference that contains aspects that some view as veering from God's Word - “Change or die” is not a Scriptural concept - would that not make it a public matter then and open for discussion based on the statement above? Why or Why Not]

When talking about public sin, we should keep in mind that we are not speaking about every time we see a called worker sin in weakness. I’m sure we have all been guilty of doing this. Perhaps we lost our temper with a delinquent. Maybe we said something which should not have been said. Possibly, we treated our family in a way that is not in keeping with the office of the ministry. For these sins, we must humbly go to our Father in heaven, and ask him to forgive us.

We also must remind ourselves of the fact that the life of a Christian reflects on our Savior. He tells us all to “...let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 5:16) When a public sin is committed, a different light emits, one that reflects poorly upon the true Light of the World. This is true of laymen and especially true of those called workers who are representing him in his work on earth. Yes, God does expect more of called workers. Whether we like it or not, he tells us, “That servant who knows his master’s will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.” Luke 12:47,48

Since he loved us and hates sin, we must also feel that same way. We can’t condone sin, but we must condemn it. We can’t hide it, but we must confess it. We can’t ignore it, but must abhor it. We can’t just let the public sin of a called worker pass by.

Love for our Savior moves us to hate sin like our Savior hates sin. We can’t ignore the very thing which caused our Savior to die. We can’t underestimate that very thing which cost him so much. We must call sin, sin. We can’t just sweep it under the carpet and ignore it any more than God could sweep sin under the carpet and ignore it. When a called worker falls into sin, our love for the Savior will move us to call a spade a spade. Our love for our Savior will move us to condemn sin with the same power that he condemned sin.

[WELS Example: In what manner should a public rebuke be carried out? If the above two paragraphs are true, then is it right that conversations on Facebook discussion groups are discouraged as was this one when Bryan wrote: Admin(s), I must say I'm disappointed. I certainly hope that the admin who took Christian's post and my post down is writing an explanation as I'm typing. What was wrong with the discussion in Christian's thread? Why or Why Not?] 

When dealing with the public sin of a called worker, we must also remember our love for Scripture. Scripture defines sin. We certainly don’t want anyone to think that Scripture doesn’t mean what it says. If the called worker is caught in a sin and we ignore that sin, it could give the impression that the Bible doesn’t really condemn that certain sin, or that the Bible doesn’t condemn any sin at all. It could raise questions like: Did God really say that premarital sex is a sin? Did God really say that a husband and wife should be married until God parts them? Did God really say that drunkenness is a sin? Did God really say that child abuse is wrong? The list could go on and on.

In our day and age Scriptures are being attacked. People are again and again posing the question, “Did God really say?” As his people, we don’t want to add fuel to that fire by ignoring the public sin of a called worker. We don’t want people to think that the Bible has changed. We don’t want people to think that it is outdated. Our love for the truth of Scriptures will move us to be very careful that we don’t cause people to misunderstand the truth.

Great care must be taken that we don’t offer the comfort of the gospel to someone who is still quite comfortable. We must be careful that we don’t give the water of life to someone who is not thirsty. We will have to make greater use of the law on the called worker who is still making excuses for his sin, or for the congregation who is self-righteously breaking the eighth commandment in their condemnation of the called worker, or for the congregation who regards this certain public sin too lightly.

When applying the law and gospel, we must take into account their attitude and their response to our admonition. Just look at the response of Jimmy Swaggart to his alleged public sins. The first time he got up before his congregation, and made a tearful confession and request for forgiveness. The second time he told them that what took place was none of their business. Perhaps there wasn’t a sin in his latest escapade. (Always try to put the best construction on everything.) Even if there wasn’t, it was the congregation’s business because there was an allegedpublic sin. There seems to be some real resentment to the admonition that was given to him. In that case, the gospel was not needed yet, but the cutting edge of the law.

God also reminds us that we should be concerned with the littlest saints, the children. Before Jesus gives us his steps for church discipline, he reminds us of the danger in causing one of his little children to sin. “But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.” (Matt. 18:6) This was brought to my attention very vividly when a fifth grade boy came up to me before catechism class, and asked if it was a sin for two people to live together outside the estate of marriage. He knew two people who were doing this. He wanted the reassurance that this was still a sin. When called workers fall into sin, we do not want one of these little ones to underestimate the seriousness of the sin, especially if it is a public sin. If we as church leaders give the impression that sin is no big deal, it will affect our children, our grandchildren, our nieces and nephews. We want to give them a strong testimony against sins and on behalf of forgiveness.

If the worker has clearly reputed of the sin, should they be asked to resign? Here is where we must look at each individual case. We have no canon laws which state when a person should remain in office or when they should be dismissed. We must be concerned not only about the sinner, but also others. If his or her sin is such that it could bring harm to others in the future, such as child abuse or sexual abuse,surrendering the call might be the only answer even if that person has sincerely repented. The same thing will be true if the sin is one that will cause offense to the saints or discredit the church in the eyes of the world.The pastor or teacher will have to weigh how remaining in office will affect other people. If it is obvious that continuing in the call will hurt others in body or soul, it would be better for all involved to surrender the call.

[WELS Example: If a pastor sexually harasses his secretary and subsequently resigns from the ministry only to be given CRM status a short time later and returns to the ministry in a different district; would that potentially hurt the souls of others who saw that happen, even if he is sincerely repentant? Would it cause offense to the saints and discredit the church in the eyes of the world? Why or Why not?]

If there isn’t a resignation, then at least there should be a public rebuke for the public sin. Notice what Paul told Timothy in 1 Tim. 5:19-21. “Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses. Those who sin are to be rebuked publicly, so that the others may take warning. I charge you, in the sight of God and Christ Jesus and the elect angels, to keep these instructions without partiality, and to do nothing out of favoritism.”

[WELS Example: It has been suggested on some Facebook discussion groups that the synod leadership plays favorites based on someone's last name which would be contrary to the statement above; would the same criteria be used for rebuking a Called Worker if his last name wasn't as popular in the synod? Why or Why not?]

-  Read "Called Workers Who Commit Public Sin" in its entirety 

*****
Brotherly Admonition
By Lowell Smith
Presented to the Arizona-California District Pastoral Conference,Mesa, Arizona, October 28-30, 1980

Pastors in attendance at a conference hardly need to be told that they have a human nature inclined to sin. None of us would question this truth. But perhaps when we are personally involved and have become the object of an admonition, the clarity of consciousness about our own sin becomes blurred. Just at such a time as this it must be remembered that the church is not some kind of mutual insurance company whose object is to protect its pastors in every situation. Rather, it is a fellowship with a purpose of representing Christ to the world and demonstrating truth and righteousness. Christ’s honor has been committed to the church’s keeping. Therefore the integrity of the pastorate must be kept, even if a personal admonition is required.

[WELS Example: When a layperson in Texas questioned how his pastor, who was also a district president, preached about justification, he was eventually faced with excommunication and told this: "Since we do not believe we have erred on any of these issues that you have sited, we cannot acknowledge that we are still in doctrinal agreement with you. Therefore, we should not commune together. In keeping with a consistent practice of the doctrine of fellowship you should mark and avoid us as persistent errorists and we are marking and avoiding you as persistent errorists as well. (Romans 16:17-18)." Would a criticism such as this by a layperson cause a pastor to immediately be on the defensive and therefore not look objectively at what the lay person was trying to say? Why or Why not?]

Pastors, because they are human, are influenced and tempted by the immoral posture of society. They have TV’s in their homes. They too hear of the types of movies, magazines and entertainment available “out there.” Some in our American culture today are dedicated to turning human beings upside down by making the cerebral subordinate to the visceral or to the genital. Often what they describe asavant-garde, bold, daring, or creative is simply turning the human being upside down. Pastors can become tainted by this thinking.

Perhaps one of the “biggest” temptations to the clergy is the “numbers” game. The desires to have the fastest growing church, more members than another, more confirmations or baptisms or raising more funds than a neighboring church are a few of the temptations of pride that lurk in us all.To attain these higher numbers it will require some shortcuts or deceptive practices. It is truly amazing how the human mind can rationalize the need for deception to gain an advantage “for the Lord.” One such example comes to mind concerning a certain evangelist who hired students to come forward for the altar call to “prime the pump.” Another is about the cleric who asked his audience to bow in prayer and then invited those present who wanted to “receive Christ” to raise their hand. Then he said “Thank you, I see your hand, I see your hand,” when in fact no one had yet responded. Of course, eventually a few hands went up, but only after some manipulation for the Lord. Have you ever wondered if the Lord would approve of all the numbers reported in the Statistical Report?

How about this metric, Stroh?
You and the Jeske mob have reduced WELS to a starving, broke synod
clawing for funds from Thrivent and a dead adulterer.
You are a disgrace to polyester suits, ugly ties,
and dumb presentations everywhere.


[WELS Example: At the Christian Leadership Experience Conference that recently took place in Arizona, there was a workshop titled "Do Metrics Belong In The Church?". One of the presentation slides said - The question is not...“Should we use metrics?” but...“What metrics should we use, how, and why?”; do classes like this help create that temptation described above therefore making it easier for pastors to fall into public sin? Why or Why not?]

- Read "Brotherly Admonition" in its entirety

Links for further reading on the examples cited:

1 comment:

  1. Good questions. It will be interesting to see what comments they bring. It would be even more interesting if some comments would come from those in positions of leadership in the synod. I'm going to go way out on a limb here and say that I doubt very much if that will be the case. Of course, it will not be out of any fear that the leaders do not speak to these matters, but that doing so on this forum might give legitimacy to this site, and encourage even more open discussion and even more questioning of their actions, and those are things up with which they cannot and will not put, at least not in a forum such as this, where they would be open to anonymous attacks. More's the pity. Still, good luck! 

Rebuking the Unbelieving Cowards

$
0
0

Church of England Accelerates Decline While Shouting "Help!"

$
0
0

Congregational cross-dressing - that's the key.
Wayne Mueller's son Adam, a Church and Changer,
has the answer. He is the one in the green dress and make-up.

Church of England Must Rethink its Approach to Numeric Decline or Face Death
Church cannot carry on as it is unless decline "urgently" reversed -- Welby and Sentamu
NEWS ANALYSIS
By David W. Virtue DD
www.virtueonline.org
January 19, 2015

The Church of England is finally coming to terms with the fact that it has been invaded by a spiritual cancer and is facing inevitable death if it doesn't find the right spiritual solution to its rapid decline and ultimate extinction.
Former Archbishop Rowan Williams never really addressed the issue as he was more concerned trying to keep the Primates from imploding every time they met. Not so with Justin Welby. He is the prince of reconciliation. While he has reconciled no one and nothing to date, it is his guiding mantra and the star in his firmament of hope.
The Church of England will no longer be able to carry on in its current form unless the downward spiral of its membership is reversed "as a matter of urgency", the Archbishops of Canterbury and York have warned. That's honest talk. Typical Sunday attendances have halved to just 800,000 in the last 40 years -- although the Church has previously claimed the decline has been levelling off in recent years. This in a nation of 60 million where more Catholics and Muslims worship God than Anglicans on any given weekend.
The Church of England could also face a dramatic shortage of priests within a decade as almost half of the current clergy retire, according to Archbishops Welby and Dr. John Sentamu of York.
Dwindling numbers in the pews will inevitably plunge the Church into a financial crisis as it grapples with the "burden" of maintaining thousands of historic buildings, they insisted.
Their blunt assessment of the Church's prospects came in a paper for the members of its ruling General Synod, which meets in London next month, setting out the case for an overhaul of finances and organization aimed at turning its fortunes around.
Income from donations in the offering plate has risen slightly in the last few years as declining congregations dig deeper. In American economic terms, that's called "dead cat bounce". For the unenlightened, this is a temporary recovery from a prolonged decline or bear market, followed by the continuation of the downtrend. A dead cat bounce is a small, short-lived recovery in the price of a declining security, such as a stock, or, in this case, a church.
Last year, Bishop Christopher Goldsmith (St. Germans, in Cornwall), warned that the church in some areas is facing a "death spiral" unless parishioners put more money in the offering plate.
Truth is, increased offerings will change nothing if people don't come back to the church, or if they don't want renewal enough to come back. Aging congregations and their aging priests (40 per cent of parish clergy are due to retire over the next decade) will be gone in that same period of time.
The two archbishops gave their backing to a series of reports calling for administrative changes in the Church to be debated by the Synod next month, but added, "Renewing and reforming aspects of our institutional life is a necessary but far from sufficient response to the challenges facing the Church of England. The urgency of the challenge facing us is not in doubt.
"Attendance at Church of England services has declined at an average of one per cent per annum over recent decades and, in addition, the age profile of our membership has become significantly older than that of the population."
So what is to be done?
Church of England leaders think they have a solution. The two archbishops think the church can be turned around by investing more in building up its presence on social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter to get its message across online as part of a "major program of renewal and reform".
Maybe. This is an example of focusing on the medium and not the message. Twitter and FACEBOOK only have as much value as people place on those they twitter. Actors, actresses, world leaders, and football players have millions of tweets. What does your local bishop have to offer that competes with that unless his message is distinctly different from them and the world around him. Being trendy won't cut it. Foppish priests, self-outed gay priests, and gay marriages in parishes make temporary news tweets, but hold nothing for the long haul either spiritually or ecclesiastically.
Some years ago, Archbishop Williams told his clergy to take on the "new atheists." He vowed to fight "new atheism" in an attempt to combat the rise of secularism and defend Christianity in Britain. Apparently, it hasn't been terribly successful as one of the fastest growing churches in England today is the new atheist church.
Recent efforts by the present Archbishop of Canterbury to send senior clergy on leadership courses look like a winner. But is it?
A 34-page report, entitled, "Talent Management for Future Leaders and Leadership Development for Bishops and Deans: A New Approach", recommends a "new and dynamic curriculum" to create a "broad and appropriately equipped pool of candidates with exceptional potential for the senior leadership roles" in the Church of England.
It proposes offering senior clerics a 12 to 18-month course with modules on "Building Healthy Organisations", "Leading for Growth" and "Reshaping Ministry." It also recommends a mini-MBA, "targeted primarily at deans" which could be extended further down the church hierarchy.
The report came under fire from the Very Rev. Prof. Martyn Percy, dean of Christ Church, Oxford, who called it a "dish of basic contemporary approaches to executive management with a little theological garnish". He's probably right bearing in mind that the whole idea will cost as must as $3 million with no guarantee of success. Critics said the proposal was full of 'executive management speak,' barely mentioning God. Newer techniques for reaching the masses will not necessarily translate into church growth.
"If the Church of England is to return to growth, there is a compelling need to realign resources and work carefully to ensure that scarce funds are used to best effect," say the archbishops. Again, this misses the point. The question still remains with all the resources the Church of England has, what is its compelling message!
This writer has been crossing the Atlantic for over 45 years watching as the whole Anglican ship of state has slowly been sinking beneath the waves. One bright hope was the emergence of ALPHA, through which the Archbishop of Canterbury was himself converted. Many believe ALPHA has run its present course and an ALPHA 2.0 is needed to reawaken the masses. Easier said than done.
One really positive idea, but not necessarily a solution, is calling on those mega-church pastors who are currently successful in Britain and ask them how they do it.
It would cost only a few thousand pounds to bring the top 23 pastors and priests in England (both Church of England and non Church of England) together for a week long gabfest.
Here are some facts:
The largest churches, some five percent of all the 37,500 churches in England, are collectively responsible for almost one-third of churchgoers. These churches are therefore a significant element of English Christianity.
There are many Catholic churches whose Sunday congregations are over one thousand people, but among other denominations, the chief ones are:
10,000 Kingsway International Christian Centre, Hackney
5,500 Kensington Temple, West London
5,000 Hillsong in Central London
4,000 Ruach Ministries, Brixton
2,500 House of Praise, Woolwich
2,500 St. Thomas Crookes, Sheffield
2,490 Holy Trinity, Brompton, West London
2,200 Jesus House for All Nations, Brent
2,000 All Souls in Central London
1,680 Holy Trinity, Cheltenham
1,450 Basingstoke Community Church
1,400 Community Church, Southampton
1,400 St. Andrew's, Chorleywood
1,400 Renewal Christian Centre, Solihull
1,200 Kingdom Faith Church, Horsham
1,100 Woodlands Church, Bristol
1,100 Trinity Baptist Church, West Norwood
1,080 St. Ebbe's, Oxford
1,030 Jesmond Parish Church, Tyneside
1,000 Christian Centre, Nottingham
1,000 St. Saviour's, Guildford
1,000 Altrincham Baptist Church, Manchester
1,000 Gold Hill Baptist Church, Chalfont St. Peter
Nine of these twenty-three churches have more than two thousand attendees on a Sunday; fourteen have between one and two thousand. Among the nine, five are Pentecostal (all with substantial black congregations), three are Church of England, and one is Independent. Among the fourteen, five are Church of England, four are New Churches, three are Baptist, and two are Pentecostal.
By comparison with church sizes in the United States and other parts of the world, these would not be called "mega-churches." In terms of churches in the U.K., these are, in effect, our mega-churches, said one report.
Virtually all the 1,900 churches with more than 350 people in their congregation are either Catholic (1,350) or evangelical (460); the remaining seventy are considered broad or liberal.
There are also virtually no churches with 350 or more in rural areas; just thirty spread across numerous commuter rural areas (and all between 350 and 400 people). There are one hundred churches of this size in city centers, 310 in inner city areas (many of which are Roman Catholic), 165 on council estates, 920 in suburban areas, and 350 in separate towns.
With these facts in hand, there are some success stories, even as England grows more secular with each passing day. Why not ask them how and why they are successful? Perhaps the Archbishop of Canterbury could invite Tim Keller from New York City and Rick Warren from Saddleback, California, to come on over to address the issue of England's spiritual malaise.
Both men have different churchmanships. Keller is Presbyterian; Warren is Southern Baptist. No matter. Both are successful church planters. Tim Keller is a theologian and Christian apologist. He is best known as the founding pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York City, New York. Rick Warren is author of The Purpose Driven Life that sold some 40 million copies and pastor of 40,000-strong Saddleback church. He is also author of The Purpose Driven Church. Clearly, both men have a story worth listening to and pointers on how to bring spiritual renewal back to England.
American and British cultures are not that far apart anymore, so clearly Church of England leaders could learn from them. At least six of the group are Anglicans. -- Holy Trinity Brompton and All Souls Langham Place are centers of evangelical power in London.
Church of England leaders will have to eat humble pie listening to non Church of England leaders tell them how to do it, but who cares. English Christianity is in its death throes. If the Church of England doesn't want its dwindling parishioners to race for the lifeboats, it had better listen to those who have made it work. Part of that clarity is a clear conviction on what the gospel is. The real issue is how to present it to Millennials and Nones who have no interest in believing something, anything that does not touch their lives.
END

ELCA Partners with WELS, ELS, and LCMS - With the Help of SP Mark Schroeder, Pope John the Malefactor, and Matt the Fat Harrison

$
0
0



Sam Birner, Martin Luther College (WELS) graduate, December, 2014



ELCA Bishops Hold Panel Discussion of Placement of LGBTQ Candidates

Print Friendly
jen and jason
Revs. Jason Glombicki and Jen Rude
This past weekend ELM was invited to participate in a panel at the Conference of Bishops to talk about placement of LGBTQ candidates for rostered ministry. The panel included Proclaim pastor, Rev. Jason Glombicki, ELM program director Rev. Jen Rude, Bishop Mark Holmerud, Bishop Ralph Jones and ReconcilingWorks Executive Director Emily Eastwood. The panel was organized and facilitated by Bishop Jon Anderson. Each panelist shared from a unique perspective to further the conversation.
Some of the things we shared from ELM’s perspective:
+ We have 150 members of Proclaim, publicly identified lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer Lutheran rostered leaders, seminarians and candidates
+ 45 synods are represented in Proclaim
+ 39 of our members are seminarians
+ Our community has tripled in size in the past 3 years and we are continuing to grow
+ 2 weeks ago, 8 of our members received assignments. These 8 join 13 other members of our community who are still awaiting first call, some after years of waiting.
+ 15 members of Proclaim are on internship this year and will be looking toward assignment next year.
God has indeed blessed our church with an abundance of gifts in these leaders!
Things are shifting – the Spirit is moving in our church. During Q & A, bishops asked thoughtful and honest questions about how to best work with LGBTQ candidates. They shared stories of creative ministry, accompanying congregations becoming open to the gifts of LGBTQ leaders, and some bishops even shared parts of their own journey toward becoming more open.
Leading up the panel we shared the topic and collected thoughts from members of Proclaim, asking, “What would you like to say to a room full of bishops?”
Here are some of those thoughts we shared with the bishops:
1. Affirm our whole selves. During the assignment process, candidates want you to be talking about them as whole people, including, but not only, their sexual orientation and gender identity. In call processes, be in communication with candidates about how and when they want to come out to congregations.
2. We are qualified candidates. You are not being asked to take inferior candidates. LGBTQ candidates have fulfilled their requirements and have heard a call as strongly as their straight counterparts and have often endured a different kind of scrutiny in answering that call. LGBTQ candidates are a gift in our church, not a problem to be solved.
3. Help open possibilities. Be open and attentive to the gifts of your congregations, especially the gifts they may not have noticed themselves. We have experienced that some congregations may not have self-identified as being open to an LGBTQ candidate, but with thoughtful and open conversation with a bishop, they realized possibilities they had not imagined before.
4. Help provide access. Be sensitive to the reality that there are more limited call opportunities for LGBTQ people, and, unless there is some clear reason not to, allow a candidate’s paperwork to be seen by congregations, especially if the pastor or candidate has taken the time to review the congregation’s published info and contacted the synod office regarding that specific call.
5. Be aware of the legal landscape. State laws regarding marriage equality and protection for adopted children of gay and lesbian parents may be a factor for a candidate and their mobility. One candidate was assigned a synod where she would have no legal protection as the adoptive mother of her and her wife’s small child. They have since moved to a state that recognizes her family, but she is still awaiting first call after 3 years.
6. Help us do ministry in the waiting. Encourage your candidates to supply preach so they can be better known in the synod and so the church can receive their gifts. One member who was awaiting first call in the New England synod teamed up with a retired pastor – he offered to preside anytime she was invited to preach (and he let her keep the check!).
7. Our prayers are with you. One of our pastors who recently received a first call and will be ordained later this month shared these words for you: “Do not be afraid, but continue to walk with your clergy and candidates as the pastor to the pastors you are called to be, trusting also your call and the Spirit’s presence to guide you.”
The conversation continues. ELM continues to be a resource for synods, candidates, rostered leaders, and congregations working to celebrate the gift of LGBTQ people called to rostered ministry in the Lutheran church. Thanks for your partnership in this Spirit-filled work!

---

Proclaim


Proclaim Logo
One of ELM’s main programs is Proclaim, the professional community for Lutheran pastors, rostered lay leaders, candidates, and seminarians who publicly identify as LGBTQ.  
ELM & Proclaim: Interested in knowing more about the roots of ELM and Proclaim? Read this interview on the history of ELM and how Proclaim became a program of ELM.
2013 Retreat Group photo
Photo by Emily Ann Garcia
Proclaim is a living witness of Extraordinary Lutheran Ministries’ core belief that ministry by people who publicly and joyfully identify as LGBTQ is one way to change the church and society to become a place more fully inclusive of all people. We believe God’s Great Welcome Table is open to all, and that all kinds of people, including those of all sexual orientations and gender identities, are called to receive and share God’s gifts.
Proclaim gathers annually in retreat (usually 2 weeks after Easter).  We move the gathering around the country and alternate between dates over a weekend and dates during the week.  More information about the retreat HERE.  

Seminarian Gus Barnes, Jr. and Rev. Angela Nelson leading worship.  Photo by Emily Ann Garcia.
Seminarian Gus Barnes, Jr. and Rev. Angela Nelson leading worship.  Photo by Emily Ann Garcia.
Proclaim was officially launched April 2, 2011 at a gathering of nearly 60 LGBTQ Lutheran rostered leaders, seminarians and spouses.  The 2nd Proclaim retreat was  in April of 2012 in Stony Point, NY. The 2013 Proclaim Retreat was April 12-15, 2013 at the Bishop’s Ranch in Sonoma, CA (group photo above).  The 2014 Proclaim Retreat was May 4-7, 2014 at Heartwood Retreat and Conference Center in Trego, WI.
The 2015 Proclaim Retreat will be April 17-20, 2015 at Stony Point Retreat Center in Stony Point, NY.  
Proclaim is open to rostered leaders, candidates, and seminarians, all Lutheran denominations and rosters (for example, ELCA,ELCIC, LCMS, ELM). This community welcomes all who fit this criteria and who wish to join.
Proclaim is funded by individual donations and through dedicated support from the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Foundation and the Phillip N. Knutson Endowment.

---

Joseph Graumann featured in Living Lutheran

Wednesday, November 28th, 2012
Joseph Graumann, an MDiv candidate at Gettysburg, Fund for Leaders recipient, and Proclaim member is featured in a Living Lutheran article, and on the home page of the ELCA.  Read his full article ” Called Through Love” here
Joseph writes offered this reflection on Proclaim & the importance of community:
As a gay future pastor in the church, I am so proud to be a part of Proclaim.  Without the work of Extraordinary Lutheran Ministries, my education — let alone my participation in the Fund For Leaders program — would not be possible.  While in Chicago, I met with Amalia to discuss how best to further Proclaim at Gettysburg seminary, and I was happy to find that there was such a vital community to be found in the organization. Even better, I was able to connect some LGBTQ-identified classmates with Proclaim’s resources and meet a fellow Proclaim-er at our annual Luther Bowl football tournament.  Because of your work, I have found a welcome place both at Gettysburg and in the wider church.
For more on ELM’s Proclaim program go here: http://www.elm.org/proclaim/

WELS Legacy of Nastiness Will Bury the Sect, With LCMS and ELS Following. Martin Stephan Lives

$
0
0
I deepened the background on the whiteboard to show Elton Stroh teaching
at Martin Luther College, WELS:
"Some of our traditional programs have become dated and uninviting."
I was thinking about the breezy denials about WELS being nasty and vindictive when anyone speaks up about an issue. These claims are found in comments on the WELS Documented Blog.

"Tut, tut. Not so, not so."

I can think of five pastors that I knew in the Michigan District WELS, with no scandal and no false teaching - all driven out by DP Seifert, who also did his best to get rid of the Intrepid Lutherans listing their names on that virtually suspended blog.

There are many more cases across WELS. Missouri has done the same thing, undercutting and hating pastors out of the ministry. Pope John the Malefactor, ELS, is the WD-40 of the Little Sect's slide into oblivion.


I changed the title to express the real reason for the syphilitic bishop's
fast exit from Dresden, taking his groupies, leaving most of his family behind.

Martin Stephan is their idol and example, because he demanded obedience and apologies - getting his disciples to enforce absolute submission, CFW Walther became the new pope by organizing a riot to rob and kidnap Bishop Stephan, the same man he made bishop in writing a few months before.

Every time a Jon Buchholz, John Seifert, Don Patterson, or Mark Jeske gets his way, another extended family is alienated from the Lutheran Church. The family members may exchange arsenic (WELS) for botulism (LCMS) or salmonella (ELS). They may become atheists or ELCA members. No one can erase the legacy, even if they deny it.

Becoming a WELS pastor means being subjected to group homosexual acts, as reported in various places and also relayed to me. One future LCMS pastor put a Michigan Lutheran Seminary student in the hospital for attacking him "that way." If someone takes all the data and puts it together, the various reports indicate a solid base of sodomy in the WELS clergy, no different from ELCA. The leaders and clergy know it. They talk about it among themselves. They know about the man/boy girlfriends moved around on the pastoral call list to supply the needs.

They know about the Mattress Room at Mequon and who was caught - both men being ordained anyway. And married. LBGTQ - alive and well in WELS.

And the pastors denying all this? They also say GA is "no more, closed down" - but now it is called HB. And so was Church and Change, "shut down, destroyed, tossed to the winds by Gurgle" - while Mark Jeske's C and C meeting was registering pastors for the next conference on the WELS websty!


---

Job security - plagiarize a gay video at Martin Luther College
and post it to YouTube, claiming,
"We had no idea we were copying a gay video from Fire Island."
All received calls.


The Undercurrent of Homosexuality



One anonymous brother recounts his experience with initiation at Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary:
During our senior year of MLC, we (the seniors in pastor track) visited the seminary. Getting of the bus we were greeted by "our brothers" as we passed through the arch of seminary students we were all groped. Literally someone had grabbed my goods and at the end of that was a fat man in a speedo who bear hugged us. I complained in a letter. Never heard back. 
I had the same experience, except it was in the parking lot behind the dorm, not under the arch.

At MLC, there was a "tradition" in the mens' (sic) dorms that if it was your birthday, a group of about 15 or 20 guys would dog-pile on top of you, all of them completely naked. There were also naked, drunken parades through the dorm hallways, accompanied by guitars and drums.

The Seminary Chorus had a custom of guys surreptitiously groping each other during performances and concerts. Professor Tiefel once commended one of the members of the choir for his wide smile during a performance. After being told that the smile was a result of being groped throughout the concert, Tiefel just laughed. I quit the choir not long afterwards.

It always seemed to me that the worst offenders in this regard were guys who had been sent away to prep school at the age of fourteen. A psychologist could probably pinpoint the reasons why, but the experience seems to warp many of them in disgusting ways. In any case, just beneath the surface of these traditions and initiation rites in the WELS system is a strong and sinister undercurrent of homosexuality. 

I'm not saying that a large number of WELS pastors are homosexual, but I'm sure there are some who have been led into temptation by these activities. And even for those who haven't, it isn't a healthy thing to make light of sin.

---

Shattered Pulpit Blog

I was abused for many years by my father, a WELS pastor. I was too young at the time to do anything, but be the "good girl" and do whatever was asked of me. Many years later when I did tell my"secrets", the DP, along with others, turned it all around and made it become my wrongdoing. Please do NOT give into them. You are the victim and the WELS is doing everything it can to turn it around and placing the blame on you. I pray that you talk to those who believe you and your safe pastor and reconsider your plan to stop writing your blog! You have opened the eyes of many people: people who DO believe you. The hierarchy of the WELS is trying to cover up anything which reflects negatively on them. You have many people praying for you. God is on your side and He will continue to be there for you. I will continue to keep you in my prayers. May God be with you and give you strength to accept His help!

---

Jane's Story: WELS Sexual Harassment

Written by "Jane"

When I accepted the Executive Assistant position at a contemporary WELS church, there were many things I expected, but sexual harassment was not one of them. In addition to the harassment, I witnessed my supervisor and "spiritual leader" demean other women (including members of the church), drink on the job, plagiarize sermons and act in the very manner you would not expect from a "called servant of The Lord".

I almost immediately observed the pastor's casualness, lack of boundaries, and what I perceived as downright laziness at times. His standards and expectations for my position as the assistant seemed to exceed his own standards as the pastor. 


Shortly after starting my position, I received a text message sometime after midnight from my supervisor telling me I should have sex with my husband. We never requested counseling or advice in this realm so his inappropriateness was rather strange at best to us. We strived to take words and actions in the best possible way. I was subjected to many routine "lapses in judgement" by my spiritual leader. Including an incident of him showing me a video that depicted nude male genitals while alone in his office.Is there ever a correct context for a supervisor to show anything like this to his married employee? (I will discuss this more at another time).

As he pushed the boundaries and inappropriateness, my conscience began to nag at me. Through even the darkest days, I allowed myself to believe that these behaviors were normal. Yet I began to feel torn between my loyalty to the church and the moral issues at hand.

I spent many nights awake and hovered over my bible in tears. There was something very wrong about what was going on at that church. I've seen it all first hand and, yet, felt obligated to keep it all a secret. It was the kind of secret that absolutely tormented me, but I thought I was doing the right thing at the time (just another lie we are led to believe as victims).

After months of utter frustration the hostile work environment began to take a toll on me and my husband. I prayerfully considered if perhaps this was an unhealthy situation for me to be in. So I gave my notice and was told to tell members of the congregation that I "wasn't a good fit" when I left my position. It was unbearable to work with a man that continued to ignore, scream, belittle, degrade and humiliate me. I left this job feeling worthless and far less confident than when I started (which was previously at a Fortune 100 company).

I suffered in silence while working at that church. I fell into a deep darkness from all that I experienced and witnessed there and its leadership. Shortly after I left the position my depression began to spiral. We maintained membership at this "relevant" church because of the relationships that we had formed with other Christians and did not want to neglect our spiritual life. The final straw was when an assault rifle was used as a sermon prop.

We decided it was best to seek the counsel of a trusted pastor since the leadership at this church either outright condoned or failed to supervise its employees and their behavior. We were convicted to resolve all this in a Christ centered way. Our hope was to see positive changes and healing for all. 



How many times does a synod president attend a
congregational meeting to cut a deal with the district president?
Mark Schroeder did, and Ski got another call.


My husband and I have continued to fight an endless battle for justice in the synod and to see that this doesn't happen to someone else. We've patiently been in contact with top synod leaders. We've encountered roadblocks, never ending circles and have witnessed inconsistencies throughout the disciplinary processes within the synod. By the Grace of God, we've encountered wonderful brothers and sisters in Christ to share in our burden. Unfortunately, we've also encountered timid leaders and those hesitant to publicly speak for the truth. People seem to selectively choose which commandments and passages to throw at you while ignoring others.

The journey has been incredibly lonely and frustrating since we were asked to remain silent and be patient. We are exhausted and completely astonished that after everything was brought into the light this man continues to be a pastor and counsel members. We will continue to persevere with others until positive changes are made in this synod so that all victims of abuse are protected rather than the perpetrators.

Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, (‭Romans‬ ‭5‬:‭3‬ ESV)

Jeff Schone went from being an awful pastor
to being an awful administrative bully at Martin Luther College:
zero tolerance for confessional students, who are driven out.

So Funny - What One Person Can Do

$
0
0



One of my readers suggested gardening posts again, and now there is a group of people asking for more. He laughs about that when he phones. "I started something."

I discuss gardening issues on Facebook too.

I am about to plant peas, which I always do as soon as I can get a shovel in the soil. That is one issue - soil temperature.

Peas tolerate cold soil and love cold weather. One legendary gardener used an electric drill to put holes in the soil to plant peas. I have not been that fanatical so far, but there is time to improve my devotion.

 
Corn is the opposite. Planting early will stop germination. One farmer waiting until the ladies no longer sat on buckets when fishing at the stream. When they could sit directly on the soil, he figured the temperature was right for corn. In Midland I waited until I could feel the warmth radiating up from the soil. That is most of the source of atmospheric heat, so it signals the time the weather will support a heat-loving, sun-loving plant. No wonder each corn seed stores a lot of energy.

The sunny garden should get corn, but it is too crowded there. Other sun-lovers are tomatoes and sunflowers. I will put strawberries and raspberries there too. Potatoes will be in the straw bales and strawberries on top.

I am all for French intensive gardening. Crowd the growing area. Once more into the breach, or fill the breach with shredded mulch.



Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more;
Or close the wall up with our English dead.
In peace there's nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility:
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger;
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage;
Then lend the eye a terrible aspect;
Let pry through the portage of the head
Like the brass cannon; let the brow o'erwhelm it
As fearfully as doth a galled rock
O'erhang and jutty his confounded base,
Swill'd with the wild and wasteful ocean.
Now set the teeth and stretch the nostril wide,
Hold hard the breath and bend up every spirit
To his full height. On, on, you noblest English.
Whose blood is fet from fathers of war-proof!
Fathers that, like so many Alexanders,
Have in these parts from morn till even fought
And sheathed their swords for lack of argument:
Dishonour not your mothers; now attest
That those whom you call'd fathers did beget you.
Be copy now to men of grosser blood,
And teach them how to war. And you, good yeoman,
Whose limbs were made in England, show us here
The mettle of your pasture; let us swear
That you are worth your breeding; which I doubt not;
For there is none of you so mean and base,
That hath not noble lustre in your eyes.
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,
Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:
Follow your spirit, and upon this charge
Cry 'God for Harry, England, and Saint George!'
Henry V

The really fun part of gardening is watching the plants come back to life. Right now the roses are dormant on 60 degree days. They know! Freezing nights will continue through February. but then planting vines and roses will begin in earnest and fall bulbs will be proving me right again (I hope).

The gardening companies, who love me, have started to write about when they will ship - March. I like that. Perhaps we will have a surprise blast of winter when we think the threat is over. But that is part of the gamble, to glare with slit eyes into the storm and promise a recovery.


Church and Change Basics from 2013

$
0
0
District VP Don Patterson denied he was Church and Change,
but he went to this conference and gave a presentation at another.
When Changer John Lawrenz wrote on the C and C list-serve,
Patterson cooed, "Pure gold."
Here is the PDF for the 2009 conference. Don't worry. If they remove it, I saved it and can reproduce it as a Word document, PNGs, or both. It is safe to say that most of the speakers are Church and Change Fellow Travelers. A few may be useful idiots. You will hear people deny their connections. If so, why have they worked so hard with these heretics?

Notice the URL for the brochure -

http://www.churchandchange.org/home/2384/2384/file/C&C%20program_color.pdf

As of today, the website is still active and working, but the links are hidden from view. But WELS innocents have been told there is no Church and Change. The appearance is - everything is gone. The reality is just the opposite.

Lookee here - the 2007 Church and Change conference is also preserved. Here is the URL:

http://www.churchandchange.org/home/2384/2384/files/CanCprogram.Web.pdf

I saved that one too.

Ski and Glende excommunicated a member for asking questions about all this. Here he is again.

Leonard Sweet is a New Age Methodist,
but WELS and Missouri devour his Dreck.

Oh! Oh! Here is a question about Leonard Sweet speaking in 2005. I have copied this far down on the page, because someone may de-rez this on the Net.




WELS Church and Change, Purpose

Church and Change is a growing group of WELS Christians who desire to think and work like the Apostle Paul who said, "I have become all things to all men so that by all possible means I might save some."  The Church and Change group is interested in practicing and promoting innovation in ministry methods throughout the WELS especially at the "grass roots" level.

Some in WELS live and breathe music.  Some history.  Some church libraries, or mission festivals, or prison ministry, or limiting abortion.  Good! God uses all effort by his people to his glory.  Church and Change is group of committed WELS Christians who live and breathe innovation in ministry across all spectrums.  Church and Change folk are committed to Lutheran Theology as explained in the Lutheran Confessions.  However, they are thinking about, working with, and pioneering different ways to reach more people, more often, with the gospel so the Holy Spirit can do His thing.  [GJ - Just one question. What moron wrote this paragraph?]

Innovation in methodology is yesterday's news in the WELS.  Pastors, teachers, synod administrators, worker training leaders, home and world missionaries, worship leaders, computer buffs, and countless local laymen and laywomen, have been tweaking (and/or radically changing) ministry methods for years.  In every WELS generation God has raised up men and women, for reasons known only to Him, who are interested in pushing the envelope of "gospel delivery systems."  And this, long before concepts like "English" or "radio ministry" or "Parish Assistance," or "paradigm" or "long distance learning" entered WELS thinking or culture.

The goal of Church and Change is to provide a gathering point, a "home room" for WELS innovators.  Perhaps this is the same need felt by the WELS Church Librarians which led them to gather for support, encouragement, and well -- good old fashioned fellowship - one of the greatest assets in the WELS.  Do WELS administrators and WELS laypeople know about each other's efforts at innovation? The purpose of Church and Change includes inviting WELS innovators to communicate with one another, and work together where possible to avoid duplication of effort which wastes God's resources.

The world is changing rapidly.  Who are the innovators of today who will help us "make the leap from German to English" in this generation?  Hopefully, Church and Change can encourage the process of helping WELS ministries keep pace with our rapidly changing culture in America, and around the shrinking globe.

If you are currently serving as an innovator in your WELS ministry, please join us.  Encourage us.  Pray for us.  Let us know what you are learning these days.  We will happily do the same for you.




The Secret History of Church and Change: No Names Given


In 1995, a group of about 10-12 men [GJ - who?] gathered at Wisconsin Lutheran College to discuss current methods of sharing Jesus which were commonly being used in the WELS at that time.  Many at the first meeting felt that those methods of sharing Jesus were not “keeping up with” the rate of change in society.  The message of the Bible was not, therefore, penetrating society very well. [GJ - Cuz the Word cannot do it without Schwaermer help.]

John Parlow, Willow Creek Ministerium member,
attended Drive 08's Babtist Worship conference,
with Ski, Glende, Jim Buske - 8 WELS workers in all.
"Dr?" Steve Witte - Gordon Conwell quickie degree, so
he could be president of the Asian porta-seminary.

 
In 1998 two men [GJ - who?] who had attended the first meeting planned a Church and Change conference in Green Bay, Wisconsin.  The next year there was a second conference in Green Bay.  About 20 people attended each year. [GJ - Witte and Parlow, doubtless, the rotten apples in Appleton]



In May 2001, WELS Parish Services applied for and received a Forward in Christ grant to conduct a three-year pilot program to address the issues surfaced by the previous two Church and Change conferences.  The three-year pilot program was designed to be a grassroots gathering of individuals who were pioneering new innovative methods of sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ with a changing culture. [GJ - You suckers paid to get Church and Change going, so they could network for synod, Thrivent, and foundation grants.]

Three annual conferences were planned and held beginning in 2001.  At the first conference, approximately 50 WELS members attended.  The attendance grew to 150 in the second year and 180 in the third year.  By the third year, the attendees included more than just individuals who were actively pioneering new and innovative methods for sharing Jesus.  Many in attendance wanted to learn about how to better share the gospel with the changing culture in which they served.  In addition to the three annual conferences a variety of other workshops and gatherings were held dealing with specific ministry issues such as leadership, worship, and women’s ministry.

At the final conference of the three-year pilot, held in November 2003, the conference participants enthusiastically encouraged the organizers to continue Church and Change.  A steering committee was subsequently formed from among the participants to address the future direction of Church and Change.

From November 2003 until the present the steering committee has met and drafted a proposal that addresses the future of Church and Change. 


---
Ron Ash, Katy Perry, and Tim Glende
are transforming the world with their new methods.

Church and Change Board of Directors - Ski bailed out officially, but was on the board earlier. Bruce Becker was on the board but left officially when this blog uncovered his dual role as head of WELS Parish Services/Church and Change board member. Chairman Ron Ash just happened to be followed at St. Peter's Freedom by Changers Glende and Ski.

Pastor Ron AshChairman
Jeff DavisVice Chairman
Barry SpencerTreasurer
Sarah OwensSecretary
Pastor John Huebner
Brian Arthur Lampe
 
Jeff Davis will help talk your congregation into a ruinous building program,
which he will help fund with law-motivated guilt giving.
Asking about his huge fees will getcha excommunicated at Holy Word, Austin Texas.


GJ - Note how Jeske-centric this board is, with three staff members from St. Marcus - 1. Ski (formerly, taking Bishop Katie, also at St. Marcus, up to Appleton with him), 2. Barry Spencer, and 3. Brian Arthur Lampe, who is a self-appointed pastor with his own ministry business.

The board is also Appleton-based, with Ron Ash (formerly at St. Peter, Freedom) as chairman, Witte and Parlow as founders.

Tracing members and moolah is a good way to see where the power and influence are. At Willowcreek's Liberal College, three members of the board are from a non-WELS congregation - CrossWalk, Luveen, Arizona (Jeff Gunn, Church and Changer). When I published that fact, WLC changed it list of board members to hide parish affiliation. I never heard of a college having three members from the same church running the place.

DP Buchholz will someday discipline Jeff Gunn and kick CrossWalk out of WELS before it actually joins WELS. It part of a 30-year plan. Right now they are on double secret probation.

---



Bailing Water has plenty of information about what has been going on.

---

Paul Calvin Kelm refused to answer his own fellow clergy
when they objected to the Leonard Sweet conference.
Likewise, Ski and Glende block email from anyone who fails to genuflect to them.
"Write a letter," SP Schroeder says.
Ski and Glende worked for.....?
Mark Jeske.


WELS Q and A

CSCWELS Topical Q&AThe Church and Its MinistryMusic/Worship: Church and Change conference
Most Recently Posted Ask a Question
Q:I recently was sent this copy and I am wondering if this is a WELS sponsered event. I found it a little strange to say the least, especially in some of the noted items such as "Insightful interviews with former WELS members" and the keynote speaker being Leonard Sweet. I know I received a brochure for the WELS Worhip Conference in MN this summer, so I'm wondering what this is, and what is the "Church and Change Steering Committee?" Is there a link on the synod website for the listserv this brochure speaks of?Here is the copy:
2005 Church and Change Conference
November 9-11
Madison, Wisconsin
The 2005 Church and Change Conference will challenge, inspire, and encourage
you as a Christian and as a leader of Christians. But then, when several
hundred creative WELS pacesetters gather around God's Word and share their
ideas, that's what we expect would happen.
We are excited to announce that world-class Christian researcher and
communicator Dr. Leonard Sweet will be the keynote speaker for this year's
conference. He will address the general session all day on Thursday,
November 10. More information about Dr. Sweet can be found at
http://www.leonardsweet.com/biocv.html

In addition to Dr. Sweet, we are putting together 15-18 workshops that will
cover subjects such as:
* New approaches to children's and youth ministry.
* Starting a contemporary worship service.
* New and effective approaches to apologetics (defending what we believe).
* Insightful interviews with former WELS members.
* Women's ministries.
* Small groups.
* Preaching in today's world.
* And much more...
The conference steering committee is interested in hearing about workshop
topics you feel are beneficial for this year's conference. Please share
your suggestions with Barry Spencer at spebar@tds.net.
New to this year's conference will be a Church and Change Exhibit Hall.
This room will feature the latest in ministry resources!
This conference is for innovative Christian leaders like yourself. Please
keep it in your prayers! Mark your calendar now! Invite your friends. And
stay tuned to our Church and Change listserv for information updates in the
coming weeks and months.

A:The Church and Change conference is put on by leaders of a number of WELS congregations, but it is not sponsored by WELS. Church and Change people have, however, reported to our Conference of Presidents in regard to their activities and WELS does send one of its administrators to attend the conference. The Conference of Presidents has in the past urged discretion on the part of all WELS affiliated organizations who use speakers from outside our doctrinal fellowship. We do not have a web link to connect you to information on the speaker.

---

Bailing Water discussion on Church and Change, plagiarism.

Waves of Nausea

In the right synod, it is transformational,
and good for the resume.


The Synodicals Treat People Like Dirt and Tell Them - "It Is Your Fault We Are Not Growing!"

$
0
0

I have plenty of contacts from all three divisions of the Stephan-Walther sect, the Saxon sex cult that followed their syphilitic bishop to Perryville, Missouri, joined the Loehe group, and excommunicated Loehe - as their show of gratitude. They stole their bishop's land, books, gold, and jeweled chalice - after overlooking his serial adultery for years.

The common thread is this - Missouri leaders, ELS leaders, and WELS leaders treat people like Dreck. That is the ultimate test:

  • How do they deal with the victims of clergy sex abuse?
  • What do they do about clergy who abuse their own children?
  • If a DP is a drunk or child molester, what do they do?
  • How do they respond to laity who beg them to grow a Lutheran spine?
  • Where is the money? as people still wonder about Stephan and Walther.
  • Are they honest about the crimes committed around them?
  • Do they have a child-like faith or an MBA in controlling people?
  • How often do they destroy evidence of a serious crime?
I know a lot of the victims. They have contacted me, sent me various kinds of evidence, and told me about how the Lutheran church leaders have stymied, blamed, and crushed them.

Clergy have described their treatment for being faithful in their calling. Almost all of them ask that I not even hint about significant details. They have already had several rounds of vindictive treatment. The final round includes having all family friends and relatives turn against them for "hurting the synod" and "getting people upset." Since each group has a cult-like closeness, that is too much to bear. 

The apostate clergy lead their pals in getting even with the children and spouse of those who disturb their service to their Father Below. Nothing is too low. No slander is too vile for them. They re-injure the wounded and blame their victims for hurting. Their only area of evangelism is increasing the tribe of Pharisees. They love, love, love their fellow Pharisees.




At the Bookstore - Too Many Books on Growing Marijuana

$
0
0
Norma Boeckler delights in God's Creation.


Backward societal trends often start in small ways.

From time to time I look at the books in the gardening section at Barnes and Noble. They have four different titles on how to grow marijuana. LI and I are not hip. We heard someone singing about "smoking indie and drinking homemade wine" at an event. The singer grinned - inside joke in more ways in one. I went home and looked it up in the Urban Dictionary, my weapon against saying the wrong thing in a college classroom.

Indie is short for indoor marijuana, apparently grown by a number of people, even in Squaresville.

Heather Cook--the Episcopal bishop who ran down the father of two small children--had a pot pipe in her car and a blood alcohol level equal to 12 drinks or more, when she was caught in 2010. She was driving in the ditch on a shredded tire, incoherent. But marijuana is harmless and healthy. Everyone covered up for her, so she ran down Tom Palermo and ran away four years later.

An ELCA bishop did the same thing, running down a woman exercising, escaping until other drivers surrounded him at a gas station.

Recently a woman left her dog in the car to freeze to death, because she was stealing goods from a store to feed her marijuana habit.

I continue to wonder how we went from the horrors of smoking Camels to the medical marvels of smoking marijuana. One inspires ignominy and shunning, the other praise and knowing smiles.

A program about addiction explained the problem this way. Two areas light up in the brain when something delights us. Morphine and other drugs make that area light up, but they take away the delight in the normal things in life - gardening, smelling roses, grandchildren, a breeze blowing across a field of clover (that bubblegum fragrance).

Soon the only thing to make that area light up in the scan is a drug.

Norma Boeckler's Creation art.


Gardening and grandchildren are the best combination. Kids love to help out gardening, and I enjoy getting sharing the work. Participating in the success of the venture is the best part. Our helper brings his children over. They were chasing newspaper sheets around the yard, because one section of Jackson Mulch dried out, the leaves blew off, and the newspapers dried and took to the air in our recent slight rain.

We were working and talking about future yields - peas, spinach, corn, various greens, roses, etc.

I will normally have extra seeds to share, so they will be starting their own garden.


Landscape Lighting, Follies, Peas and Sunflowers

$
0
0
I liked the concept of lighting the trees at night,
but I did not want so much light, the electrical bills,
and running the conduits - not that I would do that anyway.

Gradually I have added solar lighting around the exterior of the house and among the trees, even in the crepe myrtle bush. For Christmas we added solar lights to the front yard maple tree and to the porch.

These particular solar lights glow all night and brighten when someone approaches. We come home to a lit exterior that brightens when we approach the house and the front door. Three solar lights illuminate the angels in the rose garden in front.

The backdoor lights up for Sassy's jaunts outside and her return. An isolated light stays dark unless someone tries to open the backdoor of the garage. If that is not daunting, the interior security light will go off with any motion inside the garage.

The backyard trees are all lit with a soft glow. If Sassy is near one, it brightens up. Sometimes a critter wants to visit at night. The bright glow makes it clear where it has been or Sassy has walked. Overall, solar lighting is quite attractive and unobtrusive.



Rain is coming so I was thinking about those Oregon Sugar pod peas, waiting to be planted.  Our helped showed up and I handed him the rake. I hated to take work away from him, and he felt great after recovering from a cold.

Peas like shallow planting, so he pulled Jackson Mulch away from the fence and I scattered the peas along the way. He topped off the peas with mushroom compost and loose mulch. I turned on the aerial soaker hose to give them a start and push down the soil and mulch a bit.

That went so fast that we did the same along the back fence, taking a gamble that the black oil sunflowers would survice bird and squirrel predation, plus cold nights during February. The cost in seed was perhaps $1. Buying large bags of sunflower seeds for birds is much more economical than little colored packets of sunflowers with silly names like Autumn Sunset and Smiley Face.

Two soaker hoses were chewed off at the end making them useless. A third one was chewed in the middle, typical of Sassy. She may have  chewed all of them. Hanging them in the dead tree may have enticed a squirrel into a life of crime.

Soaker hoses are a bargain, but normally a one-season tool. They save a lot of time and money. Many plants (like certain roses) will mildew more easily when sprayed from a hose. A soaker hose will normally water at the base and lost little water to run-off and evaporation.

Norma Boeckler

Sunflower Seeds
We put the sunflower seeds in an ideal medium, soft moist soil, covered with soil, mulch, and leaves.

Birds will have a good time searching for seeds, and so will the squirrels. The cold nights may stop many of them, but I planted hundreds. Some will germinate and grow early. The large ones for screening will be planted in March, when they have a better chance.

Matthew 13

13 The same day went Jesus out of the house, and sat by the sea side.

2 And great multitudes were gathered together unto him, so that he went into a ship, and sat; and the whole multitude stood on the shore.

3 And he spake many things unto them in parables, saying, Behold, a sower went forth to sow;

4 And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up:

5 Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth:

6 And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.

7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:

8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold.

9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

18 Hear ye therefore the parable of the sower.

19 When any one heareth the word of the kingdom, and understandeth it not, then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart. This is he which received seed by the way side.

20 But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it;

21 Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.

22 He also that received seed among the thorns is he that heareth the word; and the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and he becometh unfruitful.

23 But he that received seed into the good ground is he that heareth the word, and understandeth it; which also beareth fruit, and bringeth forth, some an hundredfold, some sixty, some thirty.



If I had listened to my doubts and the pessimistic weather forecast of our helper, I would have saved the seeds for birdseed. But I concluded that a few surviving sunflowers would more than make up for all the losses, just like the Parable of the Sower.

The Word multiplies so it should be broadcast. The media people know this, in their own way. They borrowed a farming term for what they do . They broadcast their signal, hoping some will listen and watch.

We did not plant peas and sunflowers. We broadcast them and tucked them in with some mushroom compost and mulch. The power of the harvest will not come from our efforts but from the living seed that was waiting to germinate and grow, to flower and set seed.


WELS Teacher Arrested - Why Not Issue a Call to Don Patterson's District? That Worked Great for Ski

$
0
0
Traeder, Taylor D Schofield, WI St Matthew Lutheran School Grades 6-8, Athletic Director,
Principal Apprentice

OSHKOSH - An Iron Ridge principal appeared in court Thursday after allegedly sexting an Oshkosh police detective who was posing as a 15-year-old girl. Taylor D. Traeder, 25, appeared in Winnebago Circuit Court for his initial appearance, but the case was adjourned until Friday so Traeder could obtain an attorney. Traeder is charged with four counts of causing a child over the age of 13 to view or listen to sexual activity. If found guilty, he could face up to 24 years in prison and fines totaling $40,000. Oshkosh police arrested. 

Principal charged with child sex crime

OSHKOSH | An Iron Ridge principal appeared in court Thursday after allegedly sexting an Oshkosh police detective who was posing as a 15-year-old girl.
Taylor D. Traeder, 25, appeared in Winnebago Circuit Court for his initial appearance, but the case was adjourned until Friday so Traeder could obtain an attorney.
Traeder is charged with four counts of causing a child over the age of 13 to view or listen to sexual activity. If found guilty, he could face up to 24 years in prison and fines totaling $40,000.
Oshkosh police arrested Traeder Wednesday night.
According to the criminal complaint, an Oshkosh detective found an ad on Craigslist where a man was was looking for a female to chat with and possibly meet.
“Discretion is a must, as I am married and with my position as a teacher,” the ad stated.
The detective responded to the ad and identified himself as a 15-year-old girl from Oshkosh. The detective received a response asking why the 15-year-old read the ad and said, “I’m open to just chatting too, but just thought I would ask.”
The detective e-mailed back and forth with the poster of the ad from Dec. 9 to 10. During those conversations, the poster told the detective that he taught sixth- to seventh-grade students at a really small school and he was also the principal of that school.
According to the criminal complaint, the detective did a Google search of the phone number that was provided and found that it came back belonging to an individual who was the principal at St. Matthews Lutheran Church and School in Iron Ridge. Through the investigation, police identified the principal as Taylor D. Traeder.
According to the criminal complaint, the text messages started turning to a sexual nature on Dec. 11. At one point, the detective received a text saying,“You’re a naughty girl and I’m a naughty teacher.”
The sexually suggestive texts continued, and Traeder sent sexual pictures via text to the detective posing as the teen on Dec. 15. Oshkosh police had sent Traeder a picture of a 14-year-old girl who volunteered a photo for the investigation.
On Dec. 30, Traeder engaged in another text session where he suggested the teen he thought he was texting should visit him. The texts continued until Jan. 8
Traeder was arrested with the assistance of the Wisconsin Department of Criminal Investigation and the Dodge County Sheriff’s Department in Iron Ridge and transported to Winnebago County Jail Wednesday.
---
http://fox11online.com/2015/01/16/man-charged-for-sending-inappropriate-photos-in-oshkosh/

OSHKOSH – Oshkosh police have released the name of the 25-year-old man arrested Wednesday for allegedly sending inappropriate photos in text messages to a child.
Taylor D. Traeder from Iron Ridge, WI, was charged with four counts of causing a child to view sexual activity.
Traeder was arrested after a month long investigation by Oshkosh police. Two search warrants were conducted at his home and place of employment in Iron Ridge, WI. Traeder was taken into custody and transported to the Winnebago County Jail Jan. 14, 2015.
Investigators say Traeder had posted an ad on Craigslist looking for a woman to chat with and possibly meet. On Dec. 9, 2014, an Oshkosh Police Detective found the ad in Craigslist and responded that he was a 15-year-old girl from Oshkosh looking to chat as well.
Traeder began sending inappropriate text messages to the detective posing as the 15-year-old girl on Dec. 11. The inappropriate messages continued until Jan. 8.

Traeder, Taylor D Schofield, WI St Matthew Lutheran School Grades 6-8, Athletic Director,
Principal Apprentice
---

Man charged with sexting Oshkosh police detective, who was posing as 15-year-old girl



The 25-year-old Iron Ridge man, whom Oshkosh police arrested Wednesday on suspicion of sexting a child, sent inappropriate text messages to a person he thought was a 15-year-old girl, authorities said Friday.
Taylor D. Traeder appeared Friday without an attorney in Winnebago County Circuit Court, where he faces four felony counts of causing a child to view sexual activity. He remains in jail on a $50,000 cash bond.
Oshkosh police, along with the Wisconsin Division of Criminal Investigation and the Dodge County Sheriff’s Office, executed a search warrant at Traeder’s home and work, after a month-long investigation, according to a police department news release.
On Dec. 9, an Oshkosh police detective found an ad Traeder posted on Craigslist, in which Traeder sought a female to chat with and possibly meet, according to the news release. The detective responded to Traeder’s ad, posing as a 15-year-old girl from Oshkosh, and Traeder began sending inappropriate text messages that started on Dec. 11 and continued until Jan. 8.
Authorities are using the incident as an example to remind parents to monitor their children’s Internet and cellphone usage, according to the news release. Anyone with questions about Internet safety may contact the Oshkosh Police Department at (920) 236-5700 or their local law enforcement agency.
Traeder’s next appearance is scheduled for Jan. 29 in Winnebago County Circuit Court.
---

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 OSHKOSH POLICE DEPARTMENT
 ________________________________________
(920) 236-5742
Subject: 25 Year-Old Arrested for Four Counts of Causing Child to View Sexual Activity
MEDIA RELEASE
The Oshkosh Police Department is releasing the name of the 25 year-old male from Iron Ridge, WI on who was arrested on Wednesday, January 14, 2015 for four counts of causing child to view sexual activity.
Taylor D. Traeder, a 25 year-old male from Iron Ridge, WI, was arrested after a month long investigation by Oshkosh Police. Two search warrants were conducted at his residence and place of employment and these were conducted with the assistance of the WI Department of Criminal Investigation and the Dodge
County Sheriff’s Office in Iron Ridge, WI. Traeder was taken into custody and transported to the Winnebago County Jail on January 14, 2015.
Traeder had posted an ad on Craigslist looking for a female to chat with and possibly meet. On December
9, 2014, an Oshkosh Police Detective found the ad in Craigslist and responded that he was a 15 year-old female from Oshkosh looking to chat as well. Traeder began sending inappropriate text messages to the
Oshkosh Detective posing as the 15 year-old female on December 11, 2014. The inappropriate messages continued until January 8, 2015.
The Oshkosh Police Department strongly encourages parents/guardians to monitor their child’s usage of the internet and cellular phones. There are sexual predators that are looking to take advantage of our youth. Your active participation in monitoring children’s online activities and phone usage protects them from these predators. If you have questions about internet safety, please contact the Oshkosh Police
Department at (920) 236-5700 or your local police department. 
---



http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2015/01/wels-legacy-of-nastiness-will-bury-sect.html

Jane's Story: WELS Sexual Harassment

Written by "Jane"

When I accepted the Executive Assistant position at a contemporary WELS church, there were many things I expected, but sexual harassment was not one of them. In addition to the harassment, I witnessed my supervisor and "spiritual leader" demean other women (including members of the church), drink on the job, plagiarize sermons and act in the very manner you would not expect from a "called servant of The Lord".

I almost immediately observed the pastor's casualness, lack of boundaries, and what I perceived as downright laziness at times. His standards and expectations for my position as the assistant seemed to exceed his own standards as the pastor. 


Shortly after starting my position, I received a text message sometime after midnight from my supervisor telling me I should have sex with my husband. We never requested counseling or advice in this realm so his inappropriateness was rather strange at best to us. We strived to take words and actions in the best possible way. I was subjected to many routine "lapses in judgement" by my spiritual leader. Including an incident of him showing me a video that depicted nude male genitals while alone in his office.Is there ever a correct context for a supervisor to show anything like this to his married employee? (I will discuss this more at another time).

As he pushed the boundaries and inappropriateness, my conscience began to nag at me. Through even the darkest days, I allowed myself to believe that these behaviors were normal. Yet I began to feel torn between my loyalty to the church and the moral issues at hand.

I spent many nights awake and hovered over my bible in tears. There was something very wrong about what was going on at that church. I've seen it all first hand and, yet, felt obligated to keep it all a secret. It was the kind of secret that absolutely tormented me, but I thought I was doing the right thing at the time (just another lie we are led to believe as victims).

After months of utter frustration the hostile work environment began to take a toll on me and my husband. I prayerfully considered if perhaps this was an unhealthy situation for me to be in. So I gave my notice and was told to tell members of the congregation that I "wasn't a good fit" when I left my position. It was unbearable to work with a man that continued to ignore, scream, belittle, degrade and humiliate me. I left this job feeling worthless and far less confident than when I started (which was previously at a Fortune 100 company).

I suffered in silence while working at that church. I fell into a deep darkness from all that I experienced and witnessed there and its leadership. Shortly after I left the position my depression began to spiral. We maintained membership at this "relevant" church because of the relationships that we had formed with other Christians and did not want to neglect our spiritual life. The final straw was when an assault rifle was used as a sermon prop.

We decided it was best to seek the counsel of a trusted pastor since the leadership at this church either outright condoned or failed to supervise its employees and their behavior. We were convicted to resolve all this in a Christ centered way. Our hope was to see positive changes and healing for all. 



How many times does a synod president attend a
congregational meeting to cut a deal with the district president?
Mark Schroeder did, and Ski got another call.


My husband and I have continued to fight an endless battle for justice in the synod and to see that this doesn't happen to someone else. We've patiently been in contact with top synod leaders. We've encountered roadblocks, never ending circles and have witnessed inconsistencies throughout the disciplinary processes within the synod. By the Grace of God, we've encountered wonderful brothers and sisters in Christ to share in our burden. Unfortunately, we've also encountered timid leaders and those hesitant to publicly speak for the truth. People seem to selectively choose which commandments and passages to throw at you while ignoring others.

The journey has been incredibly lonely and frustrating since we were asked to remain silent and be patient. We are exhausted and completely astonished that after everything was brought into the light this man continues to be a pastor and counsel members. We will continue to persevere with others until positive changes are made in this synod so that all victims of abuse are protected rather than the perpetrators.

Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, (‭Romans‬ ‭5‬:‭3‬ ESV)

Jeff Schone went from being an awful pastor
to being an awful administrative bully at Martin Luther College:
zero tolerance for confessional students, who are driven out.

Episcopalians Document What the "Conservative" Lutherans Do

$
0
0


The Episcopal Church: A Rule For Thee, But Not For Me?
By Bradley Hutt
Special to Virtueonline
www.virtueonline.org
January 21, 2015

"By virtue of Baptism, all Members of the Church are called to holiness of life and accountability to one another. The Church and each Diocese shall support their members in their life in Christ and seek to resolve conflicts by promoting healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among all involved or affected." TEC Canon IV.1
The very first Canon of the Title IV Disciplinary Canons of the Episcopal Church is crystal clear in its call to support its members and resolution of conflicts where they exist, but many have observed it is in reality "a rule for thee, but not for me" for The Episcopal Church and its Presiding Bishop have not practiced what they dictate, or abide by their own canons in the handling of its biggest church fight in history.
The Episcopal Church has been involved in more than 90 lawsuits against its own members, parishes and five dioceses; Removing or suspending more than 700 Clergy without a required trial or hearing, and spending an estimated $40 million by the end of 2015 in the ongoing, seemingly never ending, litigation related items.
Equally disturbing is that most Episcopal Church goers are totally unaware of what is going on at the Church's N.Y. National Headquarters. This information has been kept from them by their parish clergy with the standard response they have been using for the past 50 years, "It doesn't affect our parish, so we do not need to talk about it."
Refusal to talk about the conflict at the parish level generated hundreds of letters to the Episcopal Church but the letters went unanswered. A Petition signed by 5,000 Christians requesting clarity and information of the dispute was also totally ignored.
The American Anglican Fellowship (AAF), a group of long-time current and former members of the Episcopal Church, believing Laity had to act through some sort of a formal complaint to get a response, filed a Complaint against Presiding Bishop Katherine Jefferts Schori on December 29, 2013.
The AAF complaint was generated from numerous public reports of violations of the church constitution and canons. Whether they are or are not violations, the AAF's stated primary interest was and still is, that they saw the entire process as an opportunity for a pastoral resolution of the issues that divide Episcopalians.
AAF provided information not to persecute or defame anyone but to initiate a possible resolution of conflicts that have forever changed thousands of lives, and destroyed relationships in the church. There are so many persons, clerical and laity who have been damaged by these actions it is impossible to determine the actual harm that has come to them.
So the question must be asked "If the Episcopal Church and its Presiding Bishop write the rules, why do they not play by the rules?"
The Presiding Bishop intervened and abruptly ended negotiations of settlement between parishes and dioceses. Where is the "healing, repentance, forgiveness, restitution, justice, amendment of life and reconciliation among all involved or affected " in that sort of action?
The seemingly endless litigation and unprecedented removal of an estimated 700 Episcopal clergy are a discredit to all members of the Church as they contradict Christ's teaching to be charitable and loving towards fellow Christians (Mt. 5:43-48).
Further, Policies of past Presiding Bishops of the Episcopal Church, and practices of Presbyterian and Lutheran denominations allowed parish departures with property. Why in the world cannot the Presiding Bishop and its Executive Council do the same?
There is a solution, for it is never too late for conciliation. AAF called for action in their complaint to end the madness of Christians suing Christians. To begin a process to reach an accord agreeable to all parties, determined at the diocesan level, for peaceful settlement of the conflict in recognition and support of the departing as an Anglican Church.
It is the right thing to do.
American Anglican Fellowship Chairman and former Senior Warden Christ Church Clinton and The Church of the Holy Communion, Diocese of Washington D.C.



Viewing all 11585 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>