Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live

Another Clergy Con Artist Dead + Robert Farrar Capon + | Media Vita In Morte Sumus. WELS-LCMS-Episcopal UOJ

$
0
0
RFC 2
Father Capon won the Future Farmers of America
funny last-name contest.
The American Academy of Clergy gave him
a medal for combining it with "Father."

+ Robert Farrar Capon + | Media Vita In Morte Sumus:

“I am and I am not a universalist. I am one if you are talking about what God in Christ has done to save the world. The Lamb of God has not taken away the sins of some — of only the good, or the cooperative, or the select few who can manage to get their act together and die as perfect peaches. He has taken away the sins of the world — of every last being in it — and he has dropped them down the black hole of Jesus’ death. On the cross, he has shut up forever on the subject of guilt: ‘There is therefore now no condemnation. . . .’ All human beings, at all times and places, are home free whether they know it or not, feel it or not, believe it or not.

“But I am not a universalist if you are talking about what people may do about accepting that happy-go-lucky gift of God’s grace. I take with utter seriousness everything that Jesus had to say about hell, including the eternal torment that such a foolish non-acceptance of his already-given acceptance must entail. All theologians who hold Scripture to be the Word of God must inevitably include in their work a tractate on hell. But I will not — because Jesus did not — locate hell outside the realm of grace. Grace is forever sovereign, even in Jesus’ parables of judgment. No one is ever kicked out at the end of those parables who wasn’t included in at the beginning.
- + Robert Farrar Capon +

'via Blog this'

More at the link. Crenshaw can see through Capon - good insights on modern theology.

http://curtiscrenshaw.wordpress.com/2011/09/12/robert-farrar-capon-the-fingerprints-of-god-grand-rapids-wm-b-eerdmans-2000-paper-178-pages/

Robert Farrar Capon, The Fingerprints of God (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2000), paper, 178 pages)

(This is a book promoting universalism, that all will be saved; review by the Rev. Curtis I. Crenshaw, Th.D.)
While on vacation this past summer, someone suggested that I read this book. At first I did not recognize the author, but then it came back to me that he was a universalist, believing that all are saved, or perhaps only a few opt out. I decided to read it. I will spend more space interacting with the book than in my normal book reviews as this author has come up before. I will do this review in four parts: the author, his thought, his theology, and the implications of his thought.

From Rick Techlin's Blog - He Was Excommunicated by Pastor Tim Glende and Ski for Telling the Truth about Pastoral Plagiarism. LCMS Is More Liberal. They Only Unfriend Me on Facebook

$
0
0
58119_539223352795256_1391636115_n
Here is a recent picture from my former congregation.  What does this picture say?
The baptismal font in the lower left corner shows that there was a baptism.  So this was not a concert.  The pastor was wearing red.  The liturgical color of white for Easter was being displayed.  The altar and a statue of Jesus were covered up by a big screen TV.  (Normally, in this congregation, only the unused pulpit is covered by a TV screen).  What else does the picture say?
The Facebook caption for the photo is: “Sunday Worship with Koine.”  (Built on the Rock, St. Peter Lutheran, Appleton, WI).  Koine is known for playing only hymns out of the hymnal, but the lyrics displayed on the screen say: “I pulled my coat tight, against the calling crowd.”  That doesn’t sound like a hymn, but who knows.
This picture has captured some attention on the internet.  For example, LCMS Pastor Todd Wilken (the host of Issues, Etc.) used the picture as “a general illustration of how contemporary worship distracts from the focus on the Word and Sacraments.”  (The Bare Bulb, “An Act of Aggression,” comment).  Does this picture illustrate how contemporary worship distracts from the means of grace, or does it illustrate genuine Lutherans using all their God given gifts to the best of their ability?

---

Todd Wilken:

http://thebarebulb.com/2013/04/27/an-act-of-aggression/comment-page-1/#comment-323

invasion
The worship war is not a bilateral conflict; it is a unilateral act of aggression.
One side in this conflict has consistently adopted an aggressive posture; the other side, a defensive one. One side has advanced; the other side has fallen back and retreated. It has been less a worship war, and more a worship invasion.
The worship war is a unilateral act of aggression, planned and pursued by those insisting on change, innovation and often the wholesale abandonment of historic Christian worship. Very few worship warriors on that side realize or admit this, but this is their proven track record for the last half-century.
The aggressors have the best intentions. They sincerely believe that their aggression has been to advance the Kingdom of God and spread the Gospel. I do not question their motives; I question their results.
Has the result been more or less focus on Christ and his saving work on the Cross for sinners? Has the result been more or less focus on God’s divine means of Grace –Baptism, Absolution, the Lord’s Supper? Has the result been more or less proclamation of the essential Christian message –repentance and the forgiveness of sins in Christ’s name?
In other words, have 50 years of worship war advances resulted in a clearer confession of the Gospel on Sunday Morning?
No, they haven’t.
This post is an edited excerpt from Behind the Music: The Real Worship War.

32 Comments on “An Act of Aggression”

  1. William Weedon
    Where did you discover that horrific picture?
  2. Randy Senn
    Thanks Todd. I have one elder who’s been pushing to “open up” our worship. Your full article from Fall 2012 will prove helpful. Sometimes parishoners need to hear from another voice that “I’m not just making this up/insisting on my own way.”
  3. Rev. Jeremiah Gumm
    Knowing the band in the picture and the circumstances of that picture, I would hesitate to equate them with a “wholesale abandonment of historic Christian worship” as mentioned in the excerpt.
    Not sure how familiar you are with the band in the picture, but they’re called Koine and the picture is of one of their concerts held at a WELS congregation rather than a “contemporary worship service”.
    Their band has done tremendous work to promote the learning of hymns, even classics by Paul Gerhardt and Johann Heermann, among the members of our congregations and schools, and has therefore been very helpful in helping to promote the Gospel in song, especially among children as they have come to love hymns that have been beloved in the Christian church for centuries albeit with a new sound. Koine’s music is almost entirely hymns directly from our hymnal with only a couple pieces written by members of the band. To find out more about them, you can visit http://www.koinemusic.com.
    While I do appreciate the sentiments in the post, the band in the image (and the circumstances of the image) should not be lumped in with the “worship warriors” described in the post.
  4. To be fair, as other Facebook comments have indicated, this was a performance by a traveling musical group, not a divine service. One might compare it to the recent performance of the Lutheran mariachi band at the International Center chapel.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10200331635947250&set=vb.6058843579&type=2&theater
    Both groups, it would seem, play respectful and doctrinally sound Christian music. Although the image of the former is much more shocking and offensive due to literally being on the altar area, both performed in a “sacred space”. No real Lutheran would (or should) consider such a performance as part of the service.
    If I was to host either Koine or Mariachi San Pablo, I would certainly prefer them to be in the church basement during a potluck or something. Sometimes, however, space is limited to the “main” church area. Pastor Weedon made a more tasteful choice by positioning the performers off to the side, rather than in, the altar area. Perhaps the pastor of the church pictured did not have that option.
    It’s still tacky and makes for a shocking picture, but is perhaps not the best “smoking gun” example of anti-liturgical storm-trooping.
  5. Todd Wilken
    It is St. Peter’s Lutheran (WELS), Appleton, WI. http://www.stpetercares.com/ and their “satellite” The Core http://www.gotocore.com.
    It is unclear whether this was a Sunday worship service or a concert. In either case, the picture confesses what it confesses. TW
  6. Debbie
    I was raised in a variety of evangelical churches befopre I converted to Lutheranism (LCMS) 35 years ago. At first I did often wonder why we did not have more upbeat and familiar contemporary worship styles. For awhile I continued visiting my evangelical roots and worried that our confessional congregation might be too tightly strung, thus making it difficult to attract new members. But what kept me in the LCMS was learning more and more about WHY confessional and traditional liturgical worship was such a special treasure not to ever be lost….every part of the service means something and is saturated in the Scripture…and this is precisely why I have grown to appreciate it much more. Now, I feel shortchanged when I experience contemporary worship. I can see how it is an attempt to blend in with pop culture and while it may be enjoyable, it is not worship. So, I very much agree that this attempt to change our traditional worship is an aggressive intrusion. Seeing that picture of the modern instruments on an altar feels very wrong! In contrast – the Mariachi group mentioned earlier was a different style, but it was a beautiful hymn they were singing. It was also a presentation at the seminary and was not even pretending to be worship. Many of the contemporary songs have no message – or are simply repetitive praise choruses that try to lift our emotions. Our worship is pure Gospel and nothing can ever replace it to preserve our message.
    Years ago our congregational Bible study spent several months studying the liturgy and what each part means. I think this would be an excellent practice in any congregation.
  7. Anonymous
    Apparently you missed the 30+ 5th and 6th graders eagerly waiting to be able to sing praises to their Savior along with Koine. You also neglected to mention that their was indeed a baptism at the baptismal font that same day and that the sacrament was administered with water and the word by a faithful pastor. You might also want to note that the 25 confirmands of this congregation had a public celebration of faith this week, each one preparing his own statement of faith, reading it to aloud to all present while their parents stood beside them at the altar encouraging them to remain faithful until the day their Savior takes them home to heaven.
  8. Todd Wilken
    So, this was a Sunday morning service? TW
  9. Todd Wilken
    Just to be clear: the picture is intended to be a general illustration of how contemporary worship distracts from the focus on the Word and Sacraments. TW
  10. Anonymous
    Just to be clear: You were at this church. You witnessed no Word and no sacrament. Or are your comments just a general illustration of how Satan distracts from the focus that should be on Christ’s sacrifice and gift of heaven that He has won for His children?
  11. Todd Wilken
    Anonymous,
    Rarely does someone resort to the “Satan” accusation so soon. Nice job. You have both demonized me, and illustrated my point: The worship war is a unilateral act of aggression. TW
  12. Johannes Oesch
    Is the worship war a unilateral act of aggression? So what would be the “preemptive strike”? – To be more serious instead of this hard core terminology, one could consider as well that the MO-Synod, during the first century of its existence, featured rather a low church type of Lutheran worship as opposed to later more high church like developments, notwithstanding the steadfast focus on law and gospel.
  13. Todd Wilken
    Joannes,
    The worship war is larger than the LCMS. And, Lutheran history did not begin with the LCMS. TW
  14. “If the Book of Concord has ceased being an accurate description of doctrine and practice in a given congregation, either the pastor of that congregation should preach and teach in order to bring the congregation back into communion with those confessions, or pastor and parish should both openly renounce the Lutheran confessions and leave our fellowship. Integrity demands it. It is openly hypocritical to stand before the holy altar and pledge fealty to confessions that one feels he is free to ignore.” — Are the Confessions Prescriptive or Descriptive? – Pr. Larry Beane: http://www.gottesdienst.org/5236.html?entryId=f844a1d9d11f989876f9747f75b3cf95
  15. Debbie
    This post and subject has been on my mind and I kept thinking about it at worship service this morning. Everything we say and do as the service progresses – expresses what we believe. If we dropped or changed anything too much, we would lose a big part of what it is that we do believe and confess each and every Sunday. If we skipped the confession, how could we then progress to absolution? If we did not speak a creed or the Lord’s Prayer – how could we reinforce the unity that we worship with together? If we do not hear the assurance of our forgiveness, how can we then go on to thank and praise God?
    I think discussion about that picture really derailed the subject of this thread. Folks get off track trying to defend the performers and are no londer even discussing the subject. We do not go to worship service to be amused or entertained. There are other times for this – fellowship meals, meetings etc…not at worship. Perhaps allowing a preformance to be held in the place of worship is agressive itself in that it clouds the purpose of the altar – placing focus and attention towards entertainment – as noble as that entertainment “ministry” might be. Our altars are sacred places and should not be used for other purposes in my opinion. They are for sharing what we believe – God made heaven and earth, sent his son to die for us giving us forgiveness of sin and gives us the Holy Spirit who comes to us in Word and Sacrament. Period. Anything else is an aggressive intrusion.
  16. appletonwi
    This was actually not Easter Sunday as some have suggested nor was this a concert. This was the third Sunday after Easter. Koine’s “service” was used for all three Sunday morning worship services that morning. The font is in it’s normal location off to the side (which is not unusual in a Lutheran church). There is more room there than the picture suggests. The font was used for a baptism that day along with the hymnal baptismal liturgy and the congregation led by Koine singing several stanzas “Children of the Heavenly Father.” Koine’s “service/program” focused on Jesus’ Resurrection and appearances (which included the Gospel reading for that day) as well as highlighted the lesson of doubting Thomas. The sermon series for April was “No Doubt” and this particular program highlighted by the scripture readings that there is “no doubt” that Jesus is our Savior. The children on the right sang a hymn with Koine toward the end of the service. The early services had a short sermon. The third service skipped the sermon (which was available on the church website) in lieu of the baptism since Koine’s program was longer than typical regular worship services. The screen covering up the chancel was brought in for this service. The regular screen is pulled down on the wall above the pulpit -which is not used for preaching in this church.
    This was not a communion Sunday. Communion was offered several other times this month.
    This church and other churches who are considering a special worship service like this need to ask themselves…. Is this the best was to show reverence and does the image above convey that? (Perhaps it would have been better to have the service in the gym across the street so they weren’t in the chancel and covering up the cross.) Why does everyone going into star-struck frenzy when Koine (or another group) comes to “perform” during worship? Is that the motivation for worship or the proper motivation that we want to display for others during worship? What message does flash photography during the service so that the images can be put on Facebook or website send to those worshiping with us, especially children? (Is it ironic that we don’t encourage flash photograph during wedding services or the Children’s Christmas service and usually have an announcement in the bulletin stating that?) What is the purpose to hymns in the worship service- Can music be too loud in church? A Lutheran church is typically built acoustically so that the worshipers can hear those around them sing. When the music is too loud, as Koine was, the purpose of this is defeated. It is a joy for me to sing with those around me. I don’t want to feel like I am listening to a CD with headphones on during Sunday morning worship.
    I absolutely enjoy going to Koine’s programs. They are filled with the traditional hymns, words from scripture and are very meaningful. I’d rather that it wouldn’t replace a regular Sunday worship, though. I’d rather they were placed somewhere other than the chancel, especially directly in front of or covering up the altar. I have attend services where Koine was used more tastefully. The service was in a large auditorium (they aren’t as loud) and they were placed off to the side (even though they are featured). I agree with Pr. Gumm’s sentiments on Koine. They have brought a fresh approach to the wonderful Gospel words of the hymns.
  17. John Brandt
    Todd, I just returned from a voters meeting and saw this in the pastor’s report describing our new pastor’s transition to the congregation:
    “During this transition he has already begun to work on projects to improve the quality of the worship experience. A new platform is being built to extend the choir/band riser closer to the chancel. This will allow singers and musicians to be more connected to the congregation. A plan is being put together to move the loudspeakers to a center cluster that will make the sound system more intelligible.”
    The only quality this sinner wants in the worship experience is the bold and clear preaching of Law and Gospel.
  18. Phinehas
    Yes, sadly this sort of nonsense has infected the WELS every bit as much as it has infected the LCMS. It’s time for the people of the WELS to admit what the LCMS has been willing to admit for quite a while: we are not united in doctrine and practice. Not at all.
    As a confessional WELS member, I share more in common with the confessional Lutherans in the LCMS (like Pastor Wilken) than I do with the infamous congregation pictured above. How long will it be before the confessional Lutherans in both the LCMS and WELS decide it’s time to leave their heterodox synods behind in order to come together to form a truly confessional Lutheran synod?
  19. Phinehas
    By the way, those who defend Koine by claiming that they sing (mostly) traditional Lutheran hymns should check the lyrics up on the jumbotron in the picture.
    “I pulled my coat tight against the calling crowd.”
    I don’t remember that line from Gerhardt or Heermann.
  20. seth
    please do not use koine as a subject when referring to this idea of worship wars. I understand your viewpoint but I feel there are far better examples for non liturgical motives as Koine has always tried to keep Lutheran liturgy as a focus for worship.
  21. “Deviations from traditional, liturgical worship and ceremony are deviations from the Lutheran confessions themselves” — Are the Confessions Prescriptive or Descriptive? – Pr. Larry Beane: http://www.gottesdienst.org/5236.html?entryId=f844a1d9d11f989876f9747f75b3cf95
  22. “The holy Fathers… instituted traditions for the sake of good order and tranquility in the church.” (Ap XV:13)
    “No one will create disorder by unnecessary innovation.” (LC I:85)
  23. “We gladly keep the old traditions set up in the church because they are useful and promote tranquility, and we interpret them in an evangelical way, excluding the opinion which holds that they justify…. We can truthfully claim that in our churches, the public liturgy is more decent than in theirs, and if you look at it correctly we are more faithful to the canons than our opponents are. In our circles…the children chant the Psalms in order to learn.” (Ap XV:38-40)
    “Nothing has been received among us, in doctrine or in ceremonies, that is contrary to Scripture or to the church catholic.” (AC Conclusion 5)
  24. Those who wish to deviate from traditionalism must either: 1) Renounce their “quia” subscriptions (often by an appeal to “show me where that is in the Bible”), 2) Claim the confessions are no longer relevant, usually by way of a form of “gospel reductionism” and the emergency situation that people are dying without Jesus, 3) Argue that Christian liberty exempts them from such passages (usually by playing Formula of Concord X over and against these other passages instead of harmonizing it with them), or 4) Put forth the proposition that the Lutheran confessions are “descriptive” rather than “prescriptive.” — Are the Confessions Prescriptive or Descriptive? – Pr. Larry Beane: http://www.gottesdienst.org/5236.html?entryId=f844a1d9d11f989876f9747f75b3cf95
  25. Johannes Oesch
    Exactly, the “historic liturgy” did not beginn here or there, and it includes a lot of turns and side roads. For instance, at Reformation time, in several southern German Lutheran cities and in the Duchy of Württemberg, the pre-Reformation type of a service of Word and Prayer was prevalent over against the type of the mass. This did not hinder the unity of Lutherans at that time, because it is enough for true unity of the church to unanimously preach the pure Gospel and administer the sacraments according to God’s Word. And it is not neccessary to keep the same ceremonies at all places, CA VII.
  26. Todd Wilken
    Johannes,
    No one has said that ceremonies must be the same. But different ceremonies should confess the same thing. Quoting from the linked article:
    “Is this division caused by new or different worship practices? No. New or different worship practices have never been a necessary cause of division. New or different worship practices can foster unity IF they confess the same Scriptural doctrine as the old worship practices. But by and large, that hasn’t been the case in the worship war. In many cases, the new and different worship practices have brought with them new and different doctrine.”
    TW
  27. Johannes Oesch
    Beautifully agreeing on this. it seems to me, that, perhaps, some common ground among the worship warriors could be found in a task for the academic sphere: One could name it: Liturgical Hermeneutics. It could be a worthy academic enterprise for the adherents of different worship styles, to scholarly interpreting the implicated meaning of their own and/or the opposite rituals. To research the comparative meaning of rituals, you need hermeneutical tools like biblical theology, doctrine and grammar, tradtion history, psychology, reception aesthetics, exegesis of musical expressions and so on and so forth. Quite a field for the seminaries and the divinity schools and their researching scholars. Me thinks, the scholars should not shun these ‘worship wars’, but should have more intense conversations within their academic turf.
  28. anonymousladyperson
    There’s a gazillion orders of worship in our hymnals. And a gazillion hymns. That’s enough to keep me busy for a lifetime.
  29. Gayle wehrli
    The stories of those who have suffered this act of aggression are so similar that it is frightening. The worst acts of aggression come from family members who have ” moved on ” and we can now no longer worship together because we just “don’t get it”. We are not in the know about what God is doing in this new way of worship they say. We don’t see that they are making many many disciples with their better, more appealing worship style…..they say. You just don’t like electric guitars…..they say. But what they don’t say is what will happen when their kids and their families leave them for greener pastures and even newer, better ways of doing church. What will “they say” then?
  30. […] of how contemporary worship distracts from the focus on the Word and Sacraments.”  (The Bare Bulb, “An Act of Aggression,” comment).  Does this picture illustrate how contemporary worship distracts from the means of grace, or […]
  31. Delwyn X. Campbell
    I just finished reading your full article, and now your angst has a fuller context for me. What I read from this blog, of course, comes through the prism of my own experiences as an African American who was not raised Lutheran, and came to the LCMS after years in the Church of God in Christ (Pentecostal Holiness denomination launched in 1906). On the one hand, the fear of fitting the parameters of Rev 3:1 (the Church at Sardis), has led many a person to desire spiritual gifts, seek a greater depth of fellowship with God, etc. It is easy to view the formal rites and ceremonies of High Church Worship as cold and formal, by contrast to the more fluid liturgy of a black Pentecostal service. Much of what you are seeing does appear, at least to me, to be attempts of white congregations to try to get some of our energy in their services. Some even go so far as trying to preach the way we do, which either amuses or impresses me, depending on how affected it is.
    The thing is, I can do Low Church and still hold to the historic Confessions – I always have. You make out that it must be an either/or. Maybe that is your testimony, but it might not be everyone else’s.
    Another thing, people often adopt the attitude of “the fox and the grapes.” If God hasn’t allowed you to experience a miraculous healing, for example, it must be that He o longer heals miraculously. I have friends who have that perspective, and, when it got down to it, that was the root of it. Someone whom they dearly loved died instead of got healed in response to prayer.
    AGain, I’m wanting to be charitable here; consider that there might be something in some of those “charismatic/pentecostal” expressions that touches the emotions. God DID, after all, create us with bodies, so He gave us tangible sacraments to taste and see that the LORD is good. Could He not have also blessed us with worship forms that allow us to express our joy? If it would not be too much trouble, try googling the Hallelujah Chorus arranged by Quincy Jones. It IS the same song, but with a style that is probably different from what you are accustomed to.Tell me what you think of it. That is what I have in mind, although I understand what you are concerned about. Also, you might consider that Luther was not trying to overthrow Roman Catholicism, as much as prune it back. That governed his actions as much as anything else.

ELCA Presiding Bishop - Previous Broken Promises

$
0
0


In case you are too innocent to interpret this -
the organization has worked for gay ordination for decades,
under various names.
LCMS and WELS pretend to oppose this philosophy,
but they gladly work with ELCA.
http://www.neos-elca.org/unified_mailing/2009/09-2009/Bishop_Eatons_2009_CWA_Update_Letter.pdf

1890 Bailey Road
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221
web site: www.neos-elca.org
330-929-9022
FAX: 330-929-9018
e-mail: office@neos-elca.org

25 August 2009

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

By now you have heard of the actions taken at the churchwide assembly: the social statement,
Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust and the four recommendations on ministry policies were
adopted. The response to these actions across the church and in our synod ranges from grief to joy,
from consternation to relief, from lamentation to celebration. One thing we all have in common is
wondering “What’s next?”

We were reminded often during the assembly to take a breath. I think that is the first thing
those of us who make up our synod should do. The actions of the assembly were a shock to the system
no matter where we are on the issue of human sexuality. This has been expressed to me by people
who are completely opposed to and by people completely in favor of changes to the ministry
policies. I strongly encourage all of us to take a breathing period during which members and congregations
take no action to leave the ELCA. And, while we are breathing, let’s call upon the breath
of the Spirit to enable us to listen to each other, bear one another’s burdens, and pray (sometimes
with sighs too deep for words).

Many have asked what these actions mean for them and for their congregations.Let me explain
what will not happen. Members, rostered leaders and congregations will not be forced to recognize
same-gender relationships, call rostered people in same-gender relationships, or preach or
teach in contradiction to their bound conscience. The synod will not– and cannot– mandate who (sic) a congregation calls as a rostered leader. Rostered leaders and congregations that disagree with the actions taken by the churchwide assembly will notbe regarded as anything less than faithful, valuable partners in the gospel.

It is important to note that the policy changes will not take place immediately. Specific language
must be developed by the appropriate churchwide units in consultation with the conference of
bishops. The ELCA church council has the responsibility to approve all final language. The earliest
that can happen is at the council’s next meeting in November.

In the meantime let us commit to pray for one another and for the ELCA, let us engage
more fully in Bible study and the Book of Faith initiative, let us “not grow weary in well-doing” as
we serve the hungry, the homeless and the stranger and let us meet together at the cross our true
source of life.

May God bless your ministry.
The Rev. Elizabeth A. Eaton, Bishop

***

GJ - As Ben Stein said, "Politicians always lie. That's what they do." Doubly so in the visible church.

ELCA began an immediate persecution of all pastors and congregations who disagreed with the vote, which was billed merely as a tolerance vote. We will let people do some of this on their own initiative, but we will not force gay ordination, gay marriage, or the calling of gay only candidates upon any congregation. Oh no, not us. We are liberals, open-minded, free-spirited - unless you cross us!

I guess Bishop Eaton left out the last part, which is why she is the Presiding Bishop now.

"So long, Gramps. The Tree of Gay-Feminist Quotas
must be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure."

Fighting Over Empty Buildings

$
0
0
The famous Dumbbell Nebula is drawn by
the gravitational pull of the Dollar Galaxy.


http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/08/mps-st-marcus-schools-have-conflicting.html

MPS (Milwaukee Public Schools) holding on to 24 vacant buildings in order to keep them out of the hands of charter schools:

Milwaukee stonewalling sales of unused schools, law firm says:
http://watchdog.org/104656/milwaukee-stonewalling-sales-of-unused-schools-to-choice-schools-law-firm-says/

“Our report shows that MPS is preventing numerous charter schools and private schools in the choice program from purchasing empty, unused school buildings. In doing so, they are directly blocking thousands of children from attending a nearby, high-performing school,” said C.J. Szafir, WILL’s education policy director in a statement released Thursday.

“And the City – by ignoring its power to sell these buildings under Act 17 – is equally culpable.”
An MPS official charges WILL with making false or misleading claims, and tells Wisconsin Reporter the law does not require MPS to sell buildings it has legitimate plans for.

Luther's Sermon for the Fifteenth Sunday after Trinity.

$
0
0
All art in this sermon was created by Norma Boeckler.



Luther's First Sermon for the FIFTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Matthew 6:24-34.


This sermon is found in all editions of the Church Postil, but in edition c. it is some different. Hence we add the extra matter in the second sermon. Erl. 14, 87; W. 11, 2168; St. L. 11, 1614.

Matthew 6:24-34.
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment? Behold the birds of the heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; and your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are not ye of much more value than they?

And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit unto the measure of his life? And why are ye anxious concerning raiment?

Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? Be not therefore anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the Gentiles seek; for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first his kingdom, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Be not therefore anxious for the morrow; for the morrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


CONTENTS:

GOD OR MAMMON. EXHORTATION AGAINST AVARICE AND ANXIETY FOR TEMPORAL THINGS, AND AN INCENTIVE TO FAITH.
I. THE EXHORTATION.

I. This Exhortation in General.

1. How Christ here at once exhibits the difference between his kingdom and that of the world.

2. The character of the persons addressed. 2.

II. This Exhortation in Detail.

A. The time, sense and understanding of this exhortation. 3-4f.

* Of avarice and mammon.

1. There are very few persons, who are free from mammon worship. 5- 8.

2. How and why those who are given to avarice, esteem God and his Word so little.

3. Why avarice Is called idolatry. 10f.

4. It is great and horrible stupidity to worship mammon. 10-13.

5. Avarice Is the worst of evils. 13-14.

6. How we are to conduct ourselves toward mammon, if we are not to be injured by it. 15-19.

B. The motives attached to this exhortation.

1. The first motive in general springs from the thought that one should not be over-anxious for food and raiment. 20-27.

* Concerning work and anxiety. a. Anxiety is forbidden, but not work. b. God does not give his blessing without work. c. The reply to those who wish to justify their anxiety by the Scriptures. 23-24. d. The labor and worry in educational anti domestic life. 25-26. e. Man should labor and let the care and worry with God.

2. The second motive emphasizes that one should not worry about securing his daily food. 28-30.

3. The third motive emphasizes that one should not worry about securing his raiment. a. The nature of this motive. 31-32. b. This motive is very powerful and puts men to shame. 32-34.

* The summary of this Gospel. 35.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


SUMMARY OF THIS GOSPEL:

1. Man cannot serve God and Mammon; for as Paul says: “But they that are minded to be rich fall into a temptation and a snare and many foolish and hurtful lusts, such as drown men in destruction and perdition.” Timothy 6:9.

2. We should labor, but let the worry with God; just as the farmer, when he has done all, still expects the fruit and harvest from God. But in this we all are tried and tempted.

3. Since God clothes and feeds the creatures he created, much more will he clothe and feed us, whose father he also is, besides being our creator.

4. They are heathen and not Christians, who do not trust God, but depend upon and trust in their own wisdom and foresight.

5. We should ask God in prayer only that we may be his children through faith, then temporal blessings enough will be added and given us by our heavenly Father. Children do not care for themselves, but their father cares for them. This is a great promise and invitation.

1. In this Gospel we see how God distinguishes Christians from heathen.

For the Lord does not deliver these teachings to the heathen, for they could not receive them, but to his Christians. However, he does not consider those Christians, who only hear his Word, so as to learn it and be able to repeat it, as the nuns do the Psalter. In this way satan also hears the Gospel and the Word of God, yea, he knows it far better than we do, and he could preach it as well as we, if he only wanted to; but the Gospel is a doctrine that should become a living power and be put into practice; it should strengthen and comfort the people, and make them courageous and aggressive.

2. Therefore they, who only thus hear the Gospel, so that they may know it and be able to speak about the wisdom of God, are not worthy to be classed among Christians; but they, who do as the Gospel teaches, are true Christians. However, very few of these are found; we see many hearers, but all are not doers of the Gospel. We wish now to examine more closely what kind of doctrine the Lord teaches in this Gospel. First, he begins with a plain, natural example, so that we all must confess it is true; experience also teaches the same to everybody. He says: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other: or else he will hold to one, and despise the other.”

3. Now he, who tries to serve two masters, will do it in a way that cannot be called serving at all; for it will certainly be as the Lord here says. One can indeed compel a servant to do a certain work against his will and he may grieve while doing it; but no one can compel him to do it cheerfully, and mean it from the bottom of his heart. He of course does the work as long as his master is present, but when he is absent, he hurrys away from his task, and does nothing well. Hence the Lord desires our service to be done out of love and cheerfully, and where it is not done thus, it is no service to him: for even people are not pleased when one does anything for them unwillingly. This is natural, and we experience daily that it is so.

Now, if it be the case among human beings that no one can serve two masters, how much more is it true in the service of God, that our service cannot be divided; but it must be done unto God alone, willingly and from the heart; therefore the Lord adds: “Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


4. God cannot allow us to have another Lord besides himself. He is a jealous God, as he says, and cannot suffer us to serve him and his enemy.

Only mine, he says, or not at all. Behold now how beautifully Christ here introduces the example: “No man,” he says, “can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” As if to say: as it is here in man’s relations to his fellows, so it is also before God.

5. We find very few, who do not sin against the Gospel. The Lord passes a severe judgment and it is terrible to hear that he should say this of us, and yet no one will confess, yea, no one will suffer it to be said that we hate and despise God and that we are his enemies. There is no one, when asked if he loves God and cleaves to him? would not reply, yes, I love God. But see how the text closes, that we all hate and despise God, and love mammon and cleave to it. But God suffers us to do this until his time; he watches the time and some day he will strike into our midst with all violence, before we can turn around. It is impossible for one, who loves gold and earthly possessions and cleaves to them, not to hate God. For God here contrasts these two as enemies to one another, and concludes, if you love and cleave to one of these two, then you must hate and despise the other. Therefore, however nicely and genteely one lives here upon earth and cleaves to riches, it cannot be otherwise than that he must hate God; and on the other hand, whoever does not cleave to gold and worldly goods, loves God. This is certainly true.

6. But who are they that love God, and cleave not to gold and worldly possessions? Take a good look at the whole world, also the Christians, and see if they despise gold and riches. It requires an effort to hear the Gospel and to live according to it. God be praised, we have the Gospel; that no one can deny, but what do we do with it? We are concerned only about learning and knowing it, and nothing more; we think it is enough to know it, and do not care whether we ever live according to it. However, on the other hand, one is very anxious when he leaves lying in the window or in the room a dollar or two, yea, even a dime, then he worries and fears lest the money be stolen; but the same person can do without the Gospel through a whole year. And such characters still wish to be considered as Evangelical.

7. Here we see what and who we are. If we were Christians, we would despise riches and be concerned about the Gospel that we some day might live in it and prove it by our deeds. We see few such Christians; therefore we must hear the judgment that We are despisers of God and hate God for the sake of riches and worldly possessions. Alas I That is fine praise We should be ashamed of ourselves in our inmost souls; there is no hope for us! What a fine condition we are in now! That means, I think, our names are blotted out. What spoiled children we are!

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


8. Now the world cannot conceal its unbelief in its coarse, outward sins, for I see it loves a dollar more than Christ; more than all the Apostles, even if they themselves were present and preached to it. I can hear the Gospel daily, but it does not profit me every day; it may indeed happen, if I have heard it a whole year, the Holy Spirit may have been given to me only one hour. Now when I enjoyed this hour I obtained not only five hundred dollars, but also the riches of the whole world; for what have I not, when I have the Gospel? I received God, who made the silver and the gold, and all that is upon the earth; for I acquired the Spirit by which I know that I will be kept by him forever; that is much more than if I had the church full of money. Examine now and see, if our heart is not a rogue, full of wickedness and unbelief. If I were a true Christian, I would say. The hour the Gospel is received, there comes to me a hundred thousand dollars, and much more. For if I possess this treasure, I have all that is in heaven and upon earth. But one must serve this treasure only, for no man can serve God and mammon. Either you must love God and hate money; or you must hate God and love money; this and nothing more.

9. The master uses here the Hebrew, which we do not. “Mammon” means goods or riches, and such goods as one does not need, but holds as a treasure, and it is gold and possessions that one deposits as stock and storage provisions. This Christians do not do, they gather no treasures; but they ask God for their daily bread. However, others are not satisfied with this, they gather a great store upon which they may depend, in case our God should die to-day or tomorrow, they might then know a way out.

Therefore St. Paul says, in Ephesians 5: 5 and Colossians 3:5, riches and covetousness are the god of this world and are idolatry, with this Christ here agrees and calls it serving mammon.

10. Now, how does it come that the Gospel and St. Paul call especially covetousness and not other sins idolatry; since uncleanness, fornication, lust, base desires, unchastity and other vices are more opposed to God? It is done to our great shame, because gold is our god, that we serve, in that we trust and rely upon it, and it can neither sustain nor save us, yea, it can neither stand nor walk, it neither hears nor sees, it has no strength nor power, with it there is neither comfort nor help. For if one had the riches of the whole world, he would not be secure for one moment before death.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


11. Of what help are his great treasures and riches to the Emperor when the hour of death arrives and he is called to die? They are a shameful, loathsome, powerless god, that cannot cure a sore, yea, it cannot keep and take care of itself, there it lies in the chest, and lets it’s devotees wait, yea, one must watch it as a helpless, powerless, weak thing. The lord who has this god must watch day and night lest thieves steal it; this helpless god can aid no one. You should have contempt for this lifeless god that cannot help in the least, and is yet so scrupulous and precious; it lets its devotees wait in the grandest style and protects itself with strong chests and castles, its lord must wait and be in anxiety every hour, lest it perishes by fire or otherwise experiences some misfortune. Does this treasure or god consist m clothing, then one must be careful and on his guard against the smallest little insects, against the moth, lest they ruin or devour it.

12. The walls of our rooms should spit upon us in contempt that we trust more in the god the moth eat and the rust corrupt, than in the God, who creates and gives all things, yea, who holds in his hand heaven and earth, and all that in them is. Is it not a foolish thing on the part of the world to turn from the true God and trust in base and low mammon, in the poor, miserable god, who cannot protect himself against rust. Oh, what a disgraceful thing this is on the part of the world! God visits gold and worldly possessions with many kinds of enemies, to bring us to see and confess our unbelief and godless character, that we thus trust in a powerless and frail god, we who could at once so easily approach and cleave to the true, powerful and strong God, who gives us everything, money, goods, fruit and all we need; yet we are so foolish and make gods out of his gifts. Shame on thee, thou cursed unbelief.

13. Other sins give us a little pleasure, we receive some enjoyment from them, as in the case of eating and drinking; in unchastity one has pleasure for a little while; likewise anger satisfies its desire, and other vices more so.

Only in this vice one must incessantly be in slavery, hounded and martyred, and in it no one has any pleasure or joy whatever. There the money lies on a pile and commands you to serve it; in spite of it letting any one draw from it a thimble full of wine there comes rust and devours it, and yet he dares not attack it, lest he angers his god. And when his servants have protected their god a long time they have no more than any poor beggar. I have nothing, yet I eat and drink as heartily as any one who has a large supply of mammon. When he dies he takes just as much along with him as I do. And it is certainly the case that these people never live as well nor as richly as the poor people often do. Who arranges this thus? God, the Lord, does it. Here some have a certain affliction of the body that they have no appetite; there others are internally unsound and never relish what they eat; here their stomach is out of order; there their lungs and liver are diseased; here is this, and there is that sickness; here they are weak and afflicted at one point, there at another, and they never have an enjoyable hour to relish what they eat or drink.

14. Thus it is with those who serve this god, mammon. The true God is still of some use, he serves the people, but mammon does not, it lies quiet and lets others serve it. And for this reason the New Testament calls covetousness idolatry, since it thus desires to be served. However, to love and not to enjoy may well vex the devil. This all now experience who love the god, mammon, and serve him. Whoever has now no sense of shame and does not turn red, has a brazen face.

15. Thus now it is with the word, “serve.” For it is not forbidden to have money and possessions, as we cannot get along without them. Abraham, Lot, David, Solomon and others had great possessions and much gold, and at the present day there are many wealthy persons who are pious, in spite of their riches. But it is one thing to have possessions and another to serve them; to have mammon, and to make a god out of it. Job also was wealthy, he had great possessions and was more powerful than all who lived in the East, as we read in the first part of the book of Job: yet he says, in Job 31:24-25: “If I have made gold my hope, and said to the fine gold, Thou art my confidence; have I rejoiced because my wealth was great, and because my hand had gotten much?”

16. The sum of all is, it is God’s will that we serve not gold and riches, and that we be not overanxious for our life; but that we labor and commend our anxiety to him. Whoever possesses riches is lord of the riches.

Whoever serves them, is their slave and does not possess them, but they possess him; for he dare not make use of them when he desires, and cannot serve others with them; yea, he is not bold enough to dare to touch it.

However, is he lord over his riches, then they serve him, and he does not serve them; then he teaches in 1 Corinthians 7:32. Hence he aids the poor with his wealth and gives to those who have nothing. When he sees a person without a coat, he says to his money: Go out, Messrs. Dollars, there is a poor, naked man, who has no coat, you must be of service to him!

There lies one sick, who has no medicine. Go forth, Squires Anneberger and Joachinesthaler, you must hasten and help him! Those, who act thus with their riches, are their lords; and all true Christians surely do this. But those who save piles of money, and ever scheme to make their heap larger instead of smaller, are servants and slaves of mammon.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


17. He is a lord of mammon who lays hold of and uses it for the sake of those who need it and lets God rule, who says in Luke 6:38. Give, and it shall be given unto you; have you nothing more, you surely have me still, and I have still enough, yea, I have more than I have given away and more than can ever be given away. We see here and there many pious poor people only for the purpose that the wealthy may help and serve them with their riches. If you do it not, you have the sure proof that you hate God.

He, whom the sentence does not terrify, that he will hear on the day of judgment, can be moved by nothing. For he will hear then from God:

Behold, thou hast hated me and loved that which could not protect itself against rust and moth. Ay, how firmly you will then stand!

18. Hence the sense is, we must own some possessions, but are not to cleave to them with our hearts; as Psalm 62:10 says: “If riches increase, set not your heart thereon.” We are to labor; but we are not to be anxious about our existence. This the Master says here in our Gospel in plain and clear words, when he thus concludes: “Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink: nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on.”

19. And he now uses a reasonable and natural form of speech, by which to close, that they are not to be anxious for the nourishment of their lives; for reason must conclude and yield that it is as Christ says, when he gives the ground and reason of his discourse by asking: “Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment!”

20. As if he would say: You turn it just around, the food should serve your life and not your life the food. The same is true in respect to raiment; the clothing should serve the body, thus the body serves the clothing. The world is so blind that it cannot see this.

21. Now we must here have a high esteem for the words of the Lord. He says, “Be not anxious;” he does not say, Labor not. Anxiety is forbidden, but not labor; yea, it is commanded and made obligatory upon us to labor until the sweat rolls down our faces. It is not God’s pleasure for man to tramp around idly; therefore he says to Adam in Genesis 3:19: “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken.” And as <19A422> Psalm 104:22-23 says: “The sun ariseth. man goeth forth unto his work and to his labor until the evening.”

We are not to be anxious, this is forbidden; for we have a rich God who promises us food and clothing; for he knows what we lack, before we are concerned and begin to pray.

22. Why then does he not give us what we need without our labor?

Because it is thus pleasing to him; he tells us to labor and then he gives it; not because of our work, but out of kindness and grace. This we see before our eyes; for although we labor every year in the field, yet God gives one year more than another. Therefore, we are fools, yea, we act contrary to God’s will, when we are worried as to how to scrape together gold and riches, since God gratuitously and richly promises that he will give us all and will abundantly provide for our every want.

23. However, one may say: Does not St. Paul tell us to be diligent, as in Romans 12:8: “He that ruleth, with diligence,” and there immediately follows verse 11, “In diligence, not slothful?” In like manner to the Philippians 2:20, he says of Timothy: “For I have no man likeminded, who will care truly for your state.” And Paul himself in 2 Corinthians 11:28 boasts that anxiety for all the churches presses upon him. Here you see how’ we are nevertheless to be anxious. Answer: Our life and a Christian character consist of two parts, of faith and of love. The first points us to God, the other to our neighbor. The first, namely faith, is not visible, God alone sees that; the other is visible, and is love, that we are to manifest to our neighbor. Now the anxiety that springs from love is commanded, but that which accompanies faith is forbidden. If I believe that I have a God, then I cannot be anxious about my welfare; for if I know that God cares for me as a father for his child, why should I fear? Why need I to be anxious, I simply say: Art thou my Father, then I know that no evil will befall me, as Psalm 16:8 says: “I have set Jehovah always before me: because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.” Thus he has all things in his hand; therefore I shall want nothing, he will care for me. If I rush ahead and try to care for myself, that is always contrary to faith; therefore God forbids this kind of anxiety. But it is his pleasure to maintain the anxious care of love, that we may help others, and share our possessions and gifts with them. Am I a ruler, I am to care for my subjects; am I a housefather, I must take care of the members of my family, and so forth, according as each one has received his gifts from God. God cares for all, and his is the care that pertains to faith. We are also to be interested in one another and this is the care of love, namely, when something is given to me, that I be diligent so that others may also receive it.

24. Here we must be guarded, lest we make a gloss, instead of understanding simply the words as they read: Be not anxious for your life.

God says: Labor, and if you accomplish nothing, I will give what is needed; does he give then see that you rightly distribute it. Do not be anxious to get, but see to it that your domestics and others also receive of that which God has given to you, and that your domestics labor and receive a Christian training.

25. Am I a preacher, my anxiety should not be where to receive what I am to preach; for if I have nothing I can give nothing. Christ says in Luke 21:15: “I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to withstand or to gainsay.” But if I have that I ought to be anxious for others to receive it from me, and that I endeavor to impart it to them in the best form possible, to teach the ignorant, to admonish and restrain those who know it, rightly to comfort the oppressed consciences, to awaken the negligent and sleepy, and put them on their guard, and the like, as St. Paul did ( 1 Timothy 4:1; 2 Timothy 3:1, Titus 3:1) and commanded his disciples Timothy and Titus to do. My anxiety should be how others are to receive something from me; but I am to study and pray to God. Studying is my labor, this is the work he desires me to do, and when it is his pleasure he will give. It can indeed happen that I may study a long time and he gives nothing, a year or more, and when it is his pleasure, he gives as long as it is pleasing to him. Then he gives copiously and to overflowing, suddenly in an hour.

26. Thus a housefather also does, he attends only to that which is commanded him, and lets our Lord God arrange as to how he will give.

When he gives, then man is concerned how to impart it to his family, and he sees that they have no need as to the body and the soul. This is what the Lord means, when he says we are not to be anxious for our food and raiment; but he certainly requires us to labor. For thou must be a long time behind the oven until something is given to thee if thou dost not till the soil and work. True it is, God can easily nourish thee without thy work, he could easily have roasted and boiled corn and wine grow on thy table; but he does not do it, it is his will that thou shouldst labor and in doing so to use thy reason.

27. In like manner it is with preaching and all our affairs. God gives us the wool, that he grows on the sheep; but it is not at once cloth, we must labor and make it into cloth; when it is cloth, it does not at once become a coat, the tailor must first work with the cloth before it is a coat; and so God does with all things, he cares for us, but we must toil and work. We have plenty examples of this before our eyes, and God relates especially two here that should really make us blush with shame, namely, those of the birds and the lilies in the field. Pointing to the birds he says: “Behold the birds of the heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; and your heavenly Father feedeth them.”

28. As if the Lord would say: You have never yet seen a bird with a sickle, with which it harvested and gathered into barns; yea, the birds do not labor like we; and still they are nourished. By this the Lord does not however teach that we are to be idle; but he tries by this example to take all anxiety from us. For a bird cannot do the work of a farmer as we do; yet, it is not free from labor, but it does the work for which it was created, namely, it bears its young, feeds them and sings to our Lord God a little song for the privilege of doing this. Had God imposed more labor upon it, then it would have done more. Early in the morning it rises, sits upon a twig and sings a song it has learned, while it knows not where to obtain its food, and yet it is not worried as to where to get its breakfast. Later, when it is hungry, it flies away and seeks a grain of corn, where God stored one away for it, of which it never thought while singing, when it had cause enough to be anxious about its food. Ay, shame on you now, that the little birds are more pious and believing than you; they are happy and sing with joy and know not whether they have anything to eat.

29. This parable is constantly taught to our great and burning shame, that we cannot do as much as the birds. A Christian should be ashamed before a little bird that knows an art it never acquired from a teacher. When in the spring of the year, while the birds sing the most beautifully, you say to one:

How canst thou sing so joyfully, thou hast not yet any grain in thy barn! It would thus mock you. It is a powerful example and should truly give offense to us and stir us to trust God more than we do. Therefore he concludes with a penetrating passage, and asks: “Are not ye of much more value than they?”

30. Is it not a great shame that the Lord makes and presents to us the birds as our teachers, that we should first learn from them? Shame on thee, thou loathsome, infamous unbelief! The birds do what they are required to do; but we not. In Genesis 1:28 we have a command that we are to be lords over all God’s creatures; and the birds are here our lords in teaching us wisdom. Away with godless unbelief! God makes us to be fools and places the birds before us, to be our teachers and rule us, in that they only point out how we serve mammon and forsake the true and faithful God. Now follows the other example of the flowers in the field, by which the Lord encourages us not to worry about our raiment; and it reads thus: “And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit unto the measure of his life? And why are ye anxious concerning raiment?

Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they toil not, neither do they spin: yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?”

31. As if to say, your life is not yours, nor is your body, you cannot make it one cubit longer or shorter; neither be anxious as to how you are to clothe yourself. Behold the flowers of the field how they are adorned and clothed, neither do they anything to that end; they neither spin nor work, yet they are beautifully clothed.

32. By this illustration the Lord again does not wish to have us cease to sew and work, but we should labor, spin and sew, and not be overanxious and worry. The evil we have is our toil; will we in addition worry, then we do like the fools; for it is enough that each day has its own evil. It seems to me, this is disdain that is commanded, that the flowers stand there and make us blush and become our teachers. Thank you, flowers, you, who are to be devoured by the cows! God has exalted you very highly, that you become our masters and teachers. Shame, that this earth bears us! Is it an honor for us? I do not know. We must here confess that the most insignificant flower, that the cattle tread under foot, should become our teacher, are we not fine people? I think so. Now Christ places alongside of this the richest and most powerful king, Solomon, who was clothed in the most costly manner in purple and gold, whose glory was not to be compared with that of the flowers, 1 Kings 10:1. Is it not remarkable that the adornment of the flowers in the field should be esteemed higher than all the precious stones, gold and silver?

33. However, we are so blind that we do not see what God designs thereby and what he means. The flower stands there that we should see it, it strikes us and says: If thou hadst the adornment of the whole world even then thou wouldst not be equal to me, who stand here, and am not the least worried whence this adornment comes to me. I do not however concern myself about that, here I stand alone and do nothing and although thou art beautifully adorned, thou art still sickly and servest impotent mammon; I however am fresh and beautiful and serve the true and righteous God.

Behold, what a loathsome, vicious thing is unbelief!

34. These are two fine and powerful examples of the birds and the lilies.

The birds teach us a lesson as to our daily food; the flowers as to our raiment. And in the whole New Testament our shame is no where so disclosed and held to view, as just in this Gospel. But they are few who understand it. From these examples and parables the Lord now concludes and says: “Be not therefore anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the Gentiles seek; for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first his kingdom and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

Be not therefore anxious for the morrow; for the morrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.”

35. Now the sum of this Gospel is: Christians should not worry about what they are to eat; God provides for them before they think of their need; but they are to labor, that is commanded them. But what the kingdom of God and his righteousness are, would require too much time to discuss, you have often heard about them, if you have been attentive. This is now enough on to-day’s Gospel. May God grant us grace that some day we may also even put it into practice! May the Gospel remain not only in our ears and on our tongues, but come into our hearts and break forth fresh into loving deeds!

36. (We follow the paragraphs of the St. Louis Walch here which has instead of 36 as in old Walch.)

---




All drawings on this page are by Norma Boeckler.



Luther's Second Sermon for the FIFTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Matthew 6:24-34.
 


KJV Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. 25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? 26 Behold the fowls of the air: for
they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not
much better than they? 27 Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28 And why
take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30
Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall
he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? 31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat?
or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles
seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33 But seek ye first the
kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no
thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the
evil thereof.


The following sermon appears in the c. edition. Erl. 14, 103;. St. L. 11, 1628.

CHRISTIANS SHOULD NOT BE ANXIOUS FOR THINGS OF THIS LIFE, BUT SEEK THE KINGDOM OF GOD.

* Avarice and anxiety are the fruits of unbelief. 1.

I. This Exhortation in General.

1. How Christ distinguishes between his kingdom and that of the world.

2. The character of the persons addressed. 3.

II. THIS EXHORTATION IN DETAIL.

THE SAME AS PARAGRAPHS 4-36 IN THE PRECEDING SERMON.

III. THE INCENTIVE TO FAITH.

1. To What Persons Does Christ Give This Incentive.

2. The Ground and Cause of This Incentive. 38-39.

3. The Incentive Itself.

A. In general. 39-40.

B. In detail.

1. The first part of this incentive.

2. The second part. 41-42. 3 . The third part.

4. The fourth part. 44-46.

5. The fifth part. 47-48.

1. This Gospel is a part of the long sermon Christ delivered to his disciples on the mount, in which among other things he especially warned and admonished his disciples against the infamous vice of avarice and anxiety for daily bread, the legitimate fruit and proof of our unbelief. This does great harm in Christendom when it takes possession of those in the office of the ministry, who should be occupied by nothing except teaching the Word of God and faith aright, and chastising the error and sin of the world; or when it possesses these it should confess God’s Words before all persons and be prepared to serve everybody for the sake of God, even if they be obliged on that account to lose their riches, honor, body and life.

2. Christ wishes also to teach here how he desires to have his kingdom distinguished from the civil life and government, that he will not govern his Christendom upon earth so that it be conceived and vested as a government where Christians are first of all to be amply provided with temporal goods, riches and power, and who need not fear any need or danger; but he wishes to provide them with spiritual treasures and what their souls need, so that they may have his Word, the consolation of his grace, and the power and strength of the Holy Spirit against sin and death unto everlasting life. Moreover whatever they need of temporal things for this life and the necessaries for present wants they are to expect also from him, and they are not to be terrified if they do not see this before their eyes and have it prepared for the future, and are tempted by want and need. On the other hand they are to know that their God and Father will care for them and will surely give them all if they with firm faith are only anxious about and seek how they may continue faithful to his word and in his kingdom, and serve him there.

3. Therefore Christ makes a distinction in this sermon, by which he separates his Christians from the heathen and unbelievers. For he does not deliver this doctrine to the heathen as they do not accept it, but to those who are already Christians. He does not however consider those Christians, who only hear his word and can repeat it, like the nuns do the Psalter. In this way satan also hears the Gospel and the Word of God, yea, he knows it better than we, and can preach it just as well as we, if he only wished to do so. But the Gospel is doctrine that is to be a living power and put into practice; it should strengthen and comfort the people and make us courageous and aggressive. Therefore they who only hear the Gospel thus, so that they know and can speak about it, are not to be classed among Christians; but those who believe and do as the Gospel teaches are righteous. “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other: or else he will hold to one and despise the other.”

4. Now he, who tries to serve two masters, will do it in a way that cannot be called serving at all; for it will certainly be as the Lord here says. One can indeed compel a servant to do a certain work against his will and he may grieve while doing it; but no one can compel him to do it cheerfully, and mean it from the bottom of his heart. He of course does the work as long as his master is present, but when he is absent, he hurries away from his task, and does nothing well. Hence the Lord desires our service to be done out of love and cheerfully, and where it is not done thus, it is no service to him: for even people are not pleased when one does anything for them unwillingly. This is natural, and we experience daily that it is so.

Now, if it be the case among human beings that no one can serve two masters, how much more is it true in the service of God, that our service cannot be divided; but it must be done unto God alone, willingly and from the heart; hence the Lord adds: “Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”



5. God cannot allow us to have another Lord besides himself. He is a jealous God, as he says, and cannot suffer us to serve him and his enemy.

We find very few, who do not sin against the Gospel. The Lord passes a severe judgment and it is terrible to hear, that he should say this of us; and yet no one will confess, yea, no one will suffer it to be said that we hate and despise God, and that we are his enemies. There is no one, when asked if he loves God and cleaves to him, who would not reply: Dost thou take me to be such a desperate character as to be an enemy of God? But see how the text here closes, that we all hate and despise God, and love and cleave to mammon. For it is impossible that he, who loves gold and riches and cleaves to them, should not hate God. Christ here holds the two opposed to one another and as enemies, and says: If you love one of these two and cleave to the same, then you must hate and despise the other.

However well a man may live here upon the earth, if he clings to riches it cannot be otherwise than that he must hate God. And whoever does not trust in gold and worldly riches, loves God. This is certain. 6-36. F5 “Be not therefore anxious, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? For alter all these things do the Gentiles seek; for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.”

37. As I said at the beginning Christ delivered this sermon to his Christians, especially to those in the office of the ministry or to those who otherwise either had nothing or never could acquire and gather for themselves riches and mammon, as the rest of the world does; in order that they might know, from what source they could nourish and support themselves and their families. Yea, they are compelled to live in the danger of being robbed of the little earthly goods God gave them and thus they are without the least doubt compelled to live entirely upon the help that God sends them and they expect from him, since the world gives them nothing.

38. This is indeed painful to flesh and blood, and is very burdensome to them, yea, no one can bear or do it, unless he is a believing Christian. For the world is so disposed that it will not take the least risk in temporal matters for the future; but it must be sure of them, order beforehand and have in store and ready for use whatever it needs, as food, peace, protection and insurance, so that it can live and depend upon neither God nor the people; but as it is evident that the world enriches no one because of his faith and piety, they think they must act and live as others do, in order that they may nevertheless have also something.

39. Against this he herewith comforts and strengthens his Christians, and again repeats: They shall therefore not worry nor doubt nor wriggle in such unbelief, saying: Oh, what is to become of us? Who is going to give us anything? Where in this world are we Christians to get food, protection, peace? But they must know that their heavenly Father provides for this, and will also give it to them, he who for this very reason is called their Father (not the unbelievers’, although he feeds all the world, and gives everything), in order to show that he will also not leave his children, tie leads them into God’s high work of the whole creation, that they may see how he nourishes and supports all things which he creates, after having ordered and regulated each one, — also all the birds in the air, which, as you know, do not fret about their food nor know beforehand whither they shall take it. Aye, especially also the little flowers does he so deck and adorn that such beauty and :finery might more fittingly be supplied elsewhere; for does it not seem quite useless, since they only bloom for perchance a day? Must he not therefore much more think and care for his Christians, how they may be fed and clad, and where they might dwell and stay as long as they have to live on earth?

40. This he admonishes them to believe; and to impress them most strongly with it, not by many but by earnest words, he suddenly breaks off after having held up to them the examples from daily life and God’s work among his Creatures; and closes with these words: Shall he not much more do such things for you, O ye of little faith? He wishes to say: Well, you ought to be ashamed of yourselves, if you are Christians and know that you have a Father in heaven, to let me do so much preaching about this! Yes, ashamed you ought to be, and not permit that such things be said of you.

But must I not say it, that ye are so small and have so little faith, and that ye so little confide without doubt and care in the living God, who gives you his Word and promise and has chosen you as his children — that he would nourish and support your body and life? How then Will ye stand without shame and disgrace, not alone before God but before all his creatures, if that is to be said of you, and you yourselves by your own confession must testify that you, having so plentifully God’s word and grace, so little trust him with caring for your miserable maggot-sack and stinking belly?



41. Still more strongly does he speak to them by saying: “After all these things do the Gentiles seek” etc. This ought surely to deter a Christian, when he hears the public and terrible verdict spoken that those who worry and hanker after mammon are heathen, that is, people who really have no God; who, instead of God, serve mammon, in which there is only God’s name and naught but lies and vanity; who therefore are wholly cut off from God, deprived of all divine knowledge, comfort, grace and bliss. These are none other than the most miserable, most unfortunate, condemned people, who have never any salvation or comfort to hope for.

42. Here you see the world pictured, what sort of a thing it is, namely the big, mighty crowd — excepting a very few Christians — who, as soon as they have grown up, turn altogether away from God and serve mammon, the god of lies. Him do they hold as the great, aye, the only god, because the crowd that follows him is so great; nevertheless he is nothing, a mere powerless name. So a Christian should truly be horrified and shocked, when thinking of such blindness and misery of the world; he should with sighs and tears strive and work for it to be far removed from such shameful practices, and run from it, as run he can, as it were out of a fire, aye, out of the midst of hell.

43. Thirdly, in order in the most loving and comforting way to entice us to believe he again says: “Your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.” Is he not your father, and only your father — not the birds’, the geese’ or ducks’, nor the godless heathens’ father! Then trust him to be so loving that he will as a father care for you and neither forget nor leave you; aye, that he has long before known what he should give you, and has provided therefor ere you yourselves think of it or feel your wants.

For who but he has before known or thought what you would be or need, ere you were born into this world? Therefore honor him so far as to believe that he sees and knows such things and, knowing them, will act with you as a father. “But seek ye first his kingdom and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.”

44. That is the chief passage in this sermon, and states the right rule and manner how we are to proceed in order to get both the divine or eternal gift, and what we need for this life. Would you rightly and well take care whereof it behooves you to take care, then let this be the first, aye, indeed, your only care, that you strive according to God’s Word to do your duty, to serve him in his kingdom as his Word teaches you — for in this consists the righteousness belonging to this kingdom — and to prize this more highly than all pertaining unto this temporal life.

If you do this you have done and provided well and need not take any further burdens upon you nor cherish any cares in your heart; indeed, it should be much too small a thing for you to care for so slight a matter as the wants of your belly, and therefore to aggrieve yourselves. Rather do this for the honor of God, and furthermore for your own use and benefit, that you strive after the great and eternal good; which if you attain and keep, the rest will surely take care of itself. Neither can you in any better way arrive at obtaining it from God, than in this wise that you first seek and ask of him the great things.



45. For this is to his liking, that we ask great things of him, and that he be able to give great and many things. And for the reason that he gladly gives great things, he will also not stint the small things, but throw them to boot into the bargain. This God has constantly caused many pious people to experience, who, following this rule and precept, have striven to help in building God’s kingdom, have served the church, furthered God’s Word, and given thereto of their means. He then on the other hand has richly blessed them with goods, honor, etc. This is evidenced by the old examples not only of the Scriptures, but also by the history of some of our pious kings and princes, who, first having given plentifully for parishes and pulpits, for the support of the holy ministry and for schools, have thereby not become poorer, but were much more richly blessed and endowed by God, so that they have reigned in good peace, with victory and good fortune.

46. This he would gladly still do, if the world could or would haply for its own good follow the well-meant advice which he here gives, and not with unbelief, greed and unchristianlike scheming rage against his Word, to its own harm and ruin. So must he turn this Word with her and prove the contrary; that he who will not strive after God’s kingdom and his righteousness, but despises the same and reckons to provide for himself, against God’s will, by means of his own wisdom and plotting, must be deprived both of the eternal and of the temporal, and either not obtain the temporal or at least not be satisfied and happy with it. “Be not therefore anxious for the morrow; for the morrow will be anxious for itself Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.”

47. The world is always anxious about the future, and therewith thinks to assure its fate and to bring this much about that it may be removed from danger, protect and support itself. They see not the vanity thereof, and that their projects go wrong; that it be true, and experience testifies, as Christ here says, that each day brings its own misfortune and evil. Thus it comes to pass that, with such plottings and prudence of their own, whereby they mean to ensure themselves and to forestall all coming danger, the world only causes the more woe and harm. For whenever they see that things do not go as they expected, or that an accident happens, then they begin to despond, think of one remedy and another, and imagine they must, wherever and as best they can, look for help, protection and safety; thus they patch for themselves and think to help matters by all sorts of strange craftiness and practices, whereunto they are driven by unbelief, against God and their conscience, thus to carry out what they have in mind, albeit they see that God does not prosper such things. Hence springs so much misfortune, misery, murder, war, and all mischief and misdoing of the wicked world. Each one means to carry out his affairs without God, to oppress and choke whosoever would hinder him, and rather to throw all things higgledy-piggledy on a heap than to desist from his mind. Thereby in all affairs and governments all good things perish and naught but evil grows; as all history and daily experience more than amply show.

48. Against this Christ would caution his believers, that they may not waver nor stake their affairs on that which is uncertain, vainly caring for the future, but at all times and daily do that which is right; that they may not worry how things will come out, nor permit themselves to be swerved by future and uncertain good or evil things; but rather commend care to God, and then take everything that occurs to them in good part and overcome it with faith and patience. For it cannot be on earth otherwise than that each one daily in his office, estate and calling meet with other things than he gladly welcomes, which causes him much trouble and labor.

Hence does also Christ call this life daily evil or misfortune, that is to say, all sorts of misfortune, resistance, hindrance; that we may know it and be prepared for it, so as not to be frightened by any of them from doing good, neither yet to hanker after the world and become partakers in its unrighteous and evil affairs, — thereby leading ourselves and others into ruin and damnation.


New Packet of Luther Sermon Links.

The Fifteenth Sunday after Trinity. Matthew 6:24-34.Behold the Birds of the Air, the Flowers of the Field

$
0
0
http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html


The Fifteenth Sunday after Trinity, 2012


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn #396   O For a Faith                                                            4:18 
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #657                Beautiful Savior                                4:24

Loving Mammon Means Hating God

The Communion Hymn # 305:1-5                       Soul, Adorn Thyself             4:23
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #23    Hallelujah! Let Praises Ring                                        4:77

KJV Galatians 5:25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. 26 Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another. 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.  2 Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ. 3 For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.  4 But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another.  5 For every man shall bear his own burden.  6 Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.  7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.  8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.  9 And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.  10 As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.

KJV Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. 25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? 26 Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? 27 Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28 And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: 29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? 31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

FIFTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY
Lord God, heavenly Father, we thank Thee for all Thy benefits: that Thou hast given us life and graciously sustained us unto this day: We beseech Thee, take not Thy blessing from us; preserve us from covetousness, that we may serve Thee only, love and abide in Thee, and not defile ourselves by idolatrous love of mammon, but hope and trust only in Thy grace, through Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html

Loving Mammon Means Hating God


KJV Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Jesus’ Sermon on the Mounts sets up a comparison that is impossible to ignore, and yet this comparison is constantly ignored, especially in the visible church, which copies the unbelieving world at its worst.

Mammon is not just money but means having an overabundance of wealth and the desire to place one’s security and happiness in that wealth. One person explained it not long ago as someone flying to a destination and being unhappy about not going by private jet instead. Commercial flights are so bothersome. Or having a billion dollars and wishing for several billion dollars, since that is so much better and secures all the happiness one might wish for.

Wealth itself is not condemned in the Bible, although the socialists think so (as long as this lesson does not apply to them). Lydia used her position as a wealthy merchant of the purple dye to help the early church.

There is no question that the unbelieving world worships mammon rather than God. This offends many Christians today, but it is to be expected. Since the True God offends unbelievers, the powers of this age keep believers from having a voice or influence in public affairs. Every form of unbelief is treated with great respect because unbelievers honor unbelievers – they all have the same god – mammon.

Luther himself was faithful to this lesson. He was given a monastery to live in, so he turned it into a motel for visitors. Everyone was welcome, including his enemies. They were welcome at his table, too. Katy had to cope with all the work and even acquired two farms so she could support this enterprise. Luther never took money for his best-selling books and gave away gifts that came to him. Once he gave a gift of gold to newly-weds, who needed it more than he did – Katy was not so sure (Bainton – Here I Stand).

In contrast, the Lutheran Church of today worships mammon. Congregations joke that their new pastor should be independently wealthy - and someone who tithes. Great honor and seriousness surround someone with a lot of money, even when people know it was gained dishonestly through greed and deception. Instead of faith bringing all forgiveness to an individual, money without faith absolves from any and all sin.

To show that money does not accomplish anything by itself, God has displayed for our edification – many congregations die away with great wealth in land and cash, having no members left - or in most cases, no Gospel left at all. The most notorious for promoting false doctrine have monetary wealth in abundance, which attracts the greedy who often rob the endowment for themselves.

But individual cases are overlooked or forgotten. The Lutheran synods of today are great examples of worshiping mammon and hating God. Oddly enough they are united by a common need from long ago. Lutherans were suspicious of insurance companies and insurance itself, so they created their own lodges (AAL and LB and Lutheran Mutual) to provide insurance benefits to members only. Catholics and Masons have the same type of lodge insurance.

The two biggest lodge or fraternal companies merged (due to financial problems) and became Thrivent. Now Thrivent rules ELCA, WELS, LCMS, and ELS with money.

When WELS was challenged for participating in the Snowbird Leadership Conference with ELCA, the official explanation was, “They were going to spend the money, so we did not want them to get our share of it.” In other words, mammon, the delusion that money buys happiness, made them work, worship, and study with ELCA. This was not the virginal ELCA with no history, but Chilstrom’s ELCA that was working hard to ordain and marry homosexuals, as he revealed in a recent article.

Participation by WELS and LCMS meant an endorsement of all that ELCA stood for, but greed and deception rule over the mammon synods. LCMS and WELS together bear false witness against ELCA 24/7, participating in all the ELCA agenda items while pretending to oppose them.

One cannot love God and Thrivent together. A synod cannot love God and Thrivent equally, because that synod will love one and hate the other.

What does it take to buy a synod’s loyalty? LCMS Synd President Matt Harrison said that Missouri got $50 to 60 million a year from Thrivent. I am guessing twice as much (at least) for ELCA and smaller amounts for the ELS and WELS.

What they do not count is what they might have if they stopped relying on selling themselves out for mammon. I have worked with a pan-Lutheran and “independent” Lutheran periodical that were both critical of Thrivent loot – until they got their own grants. Then they were silent.

This silence is the whole problem today. The Christian Church is a mouth church, as Luther said, or a mouth and ear faith, as he described in the healing of the deaf mute. When people silence themselves for fear of offending mammon, they hate God and distrust Him, because they think, “If mammon gets angry with me, I will be denied what I need, but God will understand.” Thus they hate God and honor mammon.

The Gospel is spoken and heard. If no one will teach the Gospel, then no one will hear the Gospel. This ends the creation and sustaining of faith, so the fruits of the Spirit (alternately of the Gospel, of the Word) are no longer in production.

God converts with the Word, not with love, not with money.

God has shown throughout history that those churches and individuals with the least money and power have been the most productive of Gospel blessings for others.

Loehe was confined to a small parish because his supervisors did not want to give him the kind of influence he deserved. What did he do, deprived of money and influence? He started five foreign missions and founded two Lutheran seminaries in America. He did not do this alone, but his influence and Christian leadership combined to initiate all these things that benefited many people.

Passavant, in America, went through a confessional crisis and became a Book of Concord Lutheran. He collected money from all over and used it to help hospitals, nursing homes, schools, and synods get their start. He was not Swedish but became the patron saint of the Augustana Synod. He emphasized sound doctrine and applying the Word of the Gospel. He was also more like a denomination by himself – he even ran the original Lutheran magazine, which he used to fight the anti-Confessional liberals (the Church Growthers of the day). But he bypassed the mammon of a large congregation and income to help Lutherans who needed his support, encouragement and fund-raising abilitities.

Likewise, the Lutheran hospitals and orphanages and similar institutions came from a man whose parish was so poor that he traveled around to raise money to keep it going. From the travels he was inspired to imitate the Catholic nuns and Mennonites to establish deaconess training, which influence Florence Nightingale and modern nursing. That man was Fliedner - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Fliedner

So thank Fliedner’s poverty next time you meet a nurse in a hospital.

Wichern is another pioneer in Christian good works arising from tremendous needs. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hinrich_Wichern

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html

Luther is criticized for teaching faith, against works, but these critics have not read Luther. Here is the connection:

5. We find very few, who do not sin against the Gospel. The Lord passes a severe judgment and it is terrible to hear that he should say this of us, and yet no one will confess, yea, no one will suffer it to be said that we hate and despise God and that we are his enemies. There is no one, when asked if he loves God and cleaves to him? would not reply, yes, I love God. But see how the text closes, that we all hate and despise God, and love mammon and cleave to it. But God suffers us to do this until his time; he watches the time and some day he will strike into our midst with all violence, before we can turn around. It is impossible for one, who loves gold and earthly possessions and cleaves to them, not to hate God. For God here contrasts these two as enemies to one another, and concludes, if you love and cleave to one of these two, then you must hate and despise the other. Therefore, however nicely and genteely one lives here upon earth and cleaves to riches, it cannot be otherwise than that he must hate God; and on the other hand, whoever does not cleave to gold and worldly goods, loves God. This is certainly true.

6. But who are they that love God, and cleave not to gold and worldly possessions? Take a good look at the whole world, also the Christians, and see if they despise gold and riches.
It requires an effort to hear the Gospel and to live according to it. God be praised, we have the Gospel; that no one can deny, but what do we do with it? We are concerned only about learning and knowing it, and nothing more; we think it is enough to know it, and do not care whether we ever live according to it. However, on the other hand, one is very anxious when he leaves lying in the window or in the room a dollar or two, yea, even a dime, then he worries and fears lest the money be stolen; but the same person can do without the Gospel through a whole year. And such characters still wish to be considered as Evangelical.

25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?

This is quite an introduction to the Creation comparison Jesus is about to offer. That must have been especially startling to people of that age, when clothing was quite valuable by itself and food was a major consideration each day. But this leads into a picture of Creation that no one can deny.

26 Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? 27 Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? 28 And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: 29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?

No one can deny this. The birds have almost no storage. Blue jays do a little of this, but it has been shown that a lot of their work actually builds oak forests, since they bury far more than they care to eat. They must be programmed by the Creator to do this.

Each bird wakes up in the morning without a clue about where the next meal will come from. It is possible to gather some birds together with feeders, which is fun to watch. But birds do not favor the snack food of feeders. Humming birds like insects more than sugar water and other birds keep their feeder food down to about 15% of what they eat.

But these birds cheerfully sing with nothing in the bank while we worry and fret with so much – and many safeguards besides.

Likewise the wildflowers bloom with great beauty even though they show this glory for a day and fade away soon after.

30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?

This style of arguing from the lesser to the greater is part of Jewish teaching. The comparison is impossible to miss. God takes care of everyone, especially those of the household of faith. If we can see Him taking care of His Creation so well, how can He not care for our bodily needs?

It is in this area alone where so many lose faith, so Jesus addresses us all this way – o ye of little faith. This is put into one scathing address – You Littlefaiths.

Compound words are fun, and Greek can form them easily. We use them and forget they were compound words until we look at them closely. My favorite from Pilgrim’s Progress is Hategood. The name says it all.

Littlefaith is important because it is a rebuke based upon the principal teaching of the Scriptures – to have faith in God, whose Son died for our sins and rose from the dead.

If we sincerely believe that God removes our sin by His declaration of the Gospel, which causes and increases faith, then we should not doubt His ability and desire to care for our bodily needs.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/04/norma-boecklers-new-book-treasury-of.html

31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? 32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. 33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. 34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.


The admonition to “seek first the Kingdom and its righteousness” can be translated as “seek first the Kingdom and the forgiveness of the Gospel”. I favor my own paraphrase because the Word is clear but people take “righteousness” to be a creation of man rather than one from God.

The righteousness from outside of us, from Christ, is the forgiveness of sin, justification by faith.
I went over the basics of UOJ with some Evangelical college students. I described how people believe they are born forgiven and saved, having no sin. I asked how they would respond to that. One said, “If you told me you believed that, I would start praying for you.”

Another person walked in on the discussion and said, “What? You don’t believe that?” I said, “No, but Universalists do.” The students were just shocked that anyone could get such ideas from the plain Word of God. But of course, being born forgiven and saved, and Edward Preuss wrote, was a philosophy alien to Christianity but appealing in an age turning from Pietism to Rationalism. When people are united by works-salvation, they soon explain away the rest.

28. As if the Lord would say: You have never yet seen a bird with a sickle, with which it harvested and gathered into barns; yea, the birds do not labor like we; and still they are nourished. By this the Lord does not however teach that we are to be idle; but he tries by this example to take all anxiety from us. For a bird cannot do the work of a farmer as we do; yet, it is not free from labor, but it does the work for which it was created, namely, it bears its young, feeds them and sings to our Lord God a little song for the privilege of doing this. Had God imposed more labor upon it, then it would have done more. Early in the morning it rises, sits upon a twig and sings a song it has learned, while it knows not where to obtain its food, and yet it is not worried as to where to get its breakfast. Later, when it is hungry, it flies away and seeks a grain of corn, where God stored one away for it, of which it never thought while singing, when it had cause enough to be anxious about its food. Ay, shame on you now, that the little birds are more pious and believing than you; they are happy and sing with joy and know not whether they have anything to eat.

29. This parable is constantly taught to our great and burning shame, that we cannot do as much as the birds. A Christian should be ashamed before a little bird that knows an art it never acquired from a teacher. When in the spring of the year, while the birds sing the most beautifully, you say to one:

How canst thou sing so joyfully, thou hast not yet any grain in thy barn! It would thus mock you. It is a powerful example and should truly give offense to us and stir us to trust God more than we do. Therefore he concludes with a penetrating passage, and asks: “Are not ye of much more value than they?”

30. Is it not a great shame that the Lord makes and presents to us the birds as our teachers, that we should first learn from them? Shame on thee, thou loathsome, infamous unbelief! The birds do what they are required to do; but we not. In Genesis 1:28 we have a command that we are to be lords over all God’s creatures; and the birds are here our lords in teaching us wisdom. Away with godless unbelief! God makes us to be fools and places the birds before us, to be our teachers and rule us, in that they only point out how we serve mammon and forsake the true and faithful God. Now follows the other example of the flowers in the field, by which the Lord encourages us not to worry about our raiment; and it reads thus: “And which of you by being anxious can add one cubit unto the measure of his life? And why are ye anxious concerning raiment?

Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they toil not, neither do they spin: yet I say unto you, that even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?”

31. As if to say, your life is not yours, nor is your body, you cannot make it one cubit longer or shorter; neither be anxious as to how you are to clothe yourself. Behold the flowers of the field how they are adorned and clothed, neither do they anything to that end; they neither spin nor work, yet they are beautifully clothed.


Intrepid Lutherans - Blogging Is Fellowship, Cry the Church and Change Thugs, While They Plan Their Next Change or Die! Conference With ELCA and Thrivent and Jeske, Oh My!

$
0
0
Jeske, on the Thrivent Board of Elders,
Bankrolls These Two Lavender Pimps,
And Runs WELS as a Hobby.

Blog Fellowship - Let's Blog About It!


 Thoughts from Thunder Mountain
["Huachuca" - A Chiricahua Apache word meaning "thunder."]

 Blog Fellowship - Let's Blog About It!

http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/09/blog-fellowship-lets-blog-about-it.html?showComment=1378521874388#c4920213477759160523


 "Blog"
{From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia}

A blog (a contraction of the words web log) is a discussion or informational site published on the World Wide Web and consisting of discrete entries ("posts") typically displayed in reverse chronological order (the most recent post appears first). Until 2009 blogs were usually the work of a single individual, occasionally of a small group, and often covered a single subject. More recently "multi-author blogs" (MABs) have developed, with posts written by large numbers of authors and professionally edited. MABs from newspapers, other media outlets, universities, think tanks, interest groups and similar institutions account for an increasing quantity of blog traffic. The rise of Twitter and other "microblogging" systems helps integrate MABs and single-author blogs into societal newstreams. Blog can also be used as a verb, meaning to maintain or add content to a blog.

 The emergence and growth of blogs in the late 1990s coincided with the advent of web publishing tools that facilitated the posting of content by non-technical users. (Previously, a knowledge of such technologies as HTML and FTP had been required to publish content on the Web.)

A majority are interactive, allowing visitors to leave comments and even message each other via GUI widgets on the blogs, and it is this interactivity that distinguishes them from other static websites. In that sense, blogging can be seen as a form of social networking. Indeed, bloggers do not only produce content to post on their blogs, but also build social relations with their readers and other bloggers. There are high-readership blogs which do not allow comments, such as Daring Fireball.

Many blogs provide commentary on a particular subject; others function as more personal online diaries; others function more as online brand advertising of a particular individual or company. A typical blog combines text, images, and links to other blogs, Web pages, and other media related to its topic. The ability of readers to leave comments in an interactive format is an important contribution to the popularity of many blogs. Most blogs are primarily textual, although some focus on art (art blogs), photographs (photoblogs), videos (video blogs or "vlogs"), music (MP3 blogs), and audio (podcasts). Microblogging is another type of blogging, featuring very short posts. In education, blogs can be used as instructional resources. These blogs are referred to as edublogs.

On 16 February 2011, there were over 156 million public blogs in existence. On 13 October 2012, there were around 77 million Tumblr and 56.6 million WordPress blogs in existence worldwide. According to critics and other bloggers, Blogger is the most popular blogging service used today.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Some of our brother Pastors and lay people have serious concerns about the propriety of this blog, that is, whether or not the fact that both WELS and non-WELS Pastors work together as editors constitutes a kind of fellowship in the Biblical and doctrinal sense, and therefore might be seen as unionistic and thus improper. I hope I have characterized the concern property. If not, I'm sure there will be someone willing to correct me. 

To be fully honest with you, I must admit that when I first heard this concern I thought it was rather silly and nonsensical, and thus I pretty much ignored these ideas. However, they have been repeated now for over three years, and by some of our synod leaders. Which leaders is not important - you'll just have to take my word for it. But it now occurs to me that perhaps it is time for a more in-depth discussion of this concern. Simply put, is there such a thing as "blog fellowship," akin to Church Fellowship or Altar and Pulpit Fellowship; to wit, an amendment to the Galesburg Rule would be needed: "WELS blogs for WELS Pastors only!" (ditto for ELS, LCMS, CLC, ELDoNA, ACLC, etc....)   

For my part, very obviously, I do not believe there is such a thing as blog fellowship, nor do I believe that anyone should have any perception of such fellowship simply because I, a WELS Pastor, am an associate editor/moderator along with a non-WELS Pastor. 

[By-the-way, and as an aside, perceptions are queer birds, and probably fodder for a discussion of their own. When does a perception become slander? When does a perception become reality? Is perception enough to initiate church discipline? If so, why, and when and how much perception is necessary, and on who's part? Are those who hold a perception - however erroneous - just as guilty as those who may perpetuate said perception, if not more so? Is perception of a improper fellowship putting the best construction on a brother's actions and motives? As I said, another discussion for another time, but perhaps a very important one.]

I maintain that among the millions of blogs on the internet, that there is more than one where WELS and non-WELS (other that ELS) Pastors work together on various duties related to these blogs. In addition, I know of no concerns being raised about such blogs, either by rank-in-file Pastors in the WELS or WELS leaders, at least not to the extent as such complaints have been raised to me about IL. But, on both counts I invite correction.  

Now, I know there are many of my brother Pastors out there who read this blog but do not want to comment on it publicly out of concern they may be seen as supporters of IL, or, if nothing else, at the very least of giving a kind of tacit support and approval for this blog. Let's all agree that anyone who writes in with a comment on this topic shall be totally free from such aspersions, unless they themselves actually say something positive about IL in their comment; and even then it will not be held against them. There, I think that's fair.

So, with the definition above in mind; just what is a blog, theologically speaking? Is it a "ministry?" Is it "church?" Is it a kind of fellowship? If so, what kind, and why? If not, why not? May Pastors - or lay people, for that matter - who are not in doctrinal fellowship, work together on a blog that deals with religious and spiritual questions, and provides a forum for doctrinal discussions? Why or why not? Are perceptions of fellowship enough to prohibit such working together? In addition, is a blog the same as a theological periodical, or is it different? If it is the same, why? If not, why not? Should the same standards be applied to both, or not; why or why not?

Come on, let's talk about this, shall we? It is clearly on the minds of many. Let's get it out in the open and discuss it like humble Christians striving for peaceful, thoughtful, and constructive dialog!

I will be very disappointed if we don't get a lot of comments - especially from those who criticize me for my part in IL. I really do want to hear from you, and are very interested in what you have to say. All I ask is that you say it to me here on IL so we can discuss it openly in spirit of brotherly debate. Thank you!

Deo Vindice!

Pastor Spencer

6 COMMENTS:

Vernon Knepprath said...
Pastor Spencer,

There seems to exist a double standard. A public blog with pastors outside the WELS is fellowship, but a public conference on ministry with pastors outside the WELS is not? Questionable fellowship pratices (to put it generously) by WELS pastors have gone on with ELCA clergy (female pastors among them) in a very public way in 'Change or Die' Conferences, and when I raised concerns about these practices locally in my church, I was immediately judged by some WELS pastors as being judgemental of those 'Change or Die' WELS pastors. "This was not fellowship", they told me. IL is singled out for condemnation by leaders in the synod, while no public condemnations were made toward such events as 'Change or Die'. To be clear, WELS pastors were discussing matters of ministry with ELCA pastors in a public forum, in what many would 'perceive' as a show of fellowship and unity, and synod leadership is publicly mute on the issue. As I said, this seems like a double standard to me, and I can't fathom how it can be justified with those who practice it.
Mr. Joseph Jewell said...
"Blog fellowship" is clearly nonsense on its face, and a red herring besides, especially in this era of free conferences and the like. I have most often seen and heard it used as the "trump card" excuse for discrediting or ignoring the substance of any concerns raised. It is a blunt weapon used as a tool to shut down and silence discussion, nothing more (cf. the treatment of the young laymen and students involved in Ecclesia Augustana [http://ecclesiaaugustana.blogspot.com/2013/03/rusch-encouraged-to-take-your-name-down.html] by MLC authorities).

Furthermore, discipline in the name of this novel form of "fellowship" is only, ever, applied to those perceived as too "confessional" or conservative. One is free to pursue as many projects as one desires with more liberal or emergent Christians. It is, furthermore, hard to read this as anything other than part of a growing trend. What is the synodical embrace of NIV2011, after all, if not a re-alignment of the WELS away from those who treat the words of the Bible as the inspired Word of God (ELS, LCMS, southern Baptists, conservative evangelicals--all of whom quite easily rejected the NIV2011 as a substandard paraphrase, while we collectively wrung our hands and convinced ourselves we could swallow it) and towards those who do not?

Why all the concern over "blog fellowship" and none over "translation fellowship"? I am much more scandalized and ashamed by the fact that so many WELS leaders are so enthusiastic for a Bible that has been universally rejected by our confessional Lutheran brethren and cousins than I am about any level of blogging activity.
Tim Niedfeldt said...
I would agree wholeheartedly with Joe and Vernon, thanks for saving me some typing.

Blog fellowship is not Church. Synod is not even church. Synod is administration (and not that good of administration at that.) Taken to the extreme one could then express dismay at RSS feed fellowship if some article rolls by from a non fellowship source. Where does that nonsense stop. I am willing to entertain any Southeastern Wisconsin synod official over a cup of coffee and a Skillet at any greek family restaurant to discuss a sound rationale for how Blog fellowship should be enforced yet Time of Grace can do whatever the heck they want with anyone they want.

Tim Niedfeldt

PS: As a software developer, if I design a Mobile app with a product feed from CPH would that be Web Service fellowship? Would I be able to develop Open Source Lutheran software? ;)
Rev. Paul A. Rydecki said...
No worries, Father Spencer! Those of us outside the WELS will continue to tolerate comments from WELS members. :)

And we certainly won't consider it to be any form of fellowship. Just a platform to discuss crazy stuff like the Lutheran doctrine confessed in the Book of Concord.
Joel A. Dusek said...
Rev. Spencer,

It is unfortunate that more WELS (and other sympathetic) pastors and laity don't participate in the conversation. My two favorite Lutheran blogs are IL and the BJS at steadfastlutherans.com. On BJS, run by confessional LCMS pastors, there exists robust debate and discussion of issues, as well as apologetics, sermons, and other confessional content. However, getting WELS folks to participate here seems to be like pulling teeth. I can't explain this, except to presume that the concepts of "WELS for WELS only", and "Our Beloved Synod" extend into the blogosphere. The Cult of WELS will not participate in things antithetical to the Cult.

The "blog fellowship" idea seems to be a particular tactic of those within WELS who don't want there to be any discussion or deviation from the WELS line. I do not believe this to be a new concept, but "blog fellowship" is a new way of slinging the arrow of "divisiveness". WELS is OK with debate but only at approved conferences, conventions, and symposia under the control of the bureaucracy. I believe that the academicians at the Seminary are the unofficially approved personnel to settle debates and once the debate is settled, none shall dissent; as we saw with the NIV2011, that includes the Synod President. Recall that the Seminary actually held a Symposium directed specifically at their "perceptions" of Intrepid Lutherans, although it was thinly disguised as a general talks on concepts of blog fellowship. Anything that deviates from the WELS approved methodology and debate processes is accused of being "divisive" and "not putting the best construction on everything", the dual hammers of 1 Corinthians 12 and the 8th Commandment. Dissent and disagreement, no matter how well presented, are not tolerated.

I don't know if there's a fix for this, as the problem is not with the blog, but the concept of dissent. It is likely an obstacle that simply needs to be powered through, confessional Lutherans must simply hold fast, not be intimidated, and continue the discussions. I am thankful for the information on IL (even Mr. Lindee's long articles!) and encourage everyone from laity to Synod President and even the eggheads at the Seminary to join the discussion, even if one doesn't agree.

Spenglergeist!
Joel A. Dusek said...
On a technical note, posting comments from mobile devices, such a iPhones, does not seems to be possible. Comments can be entered but not edited and when attempting to publish the security codes do not appear or are not accepted. Is there an admin option on the Blogger to allow posts from mobile?

---

Classic Ichabod -


Thursday, April 18, 2013

Ten Talents For Christ / Change Or Die Conference, 2013.
Don't Fail To Miss It

Jeske made the PDF impossible to copy this year.
Ichabod effect? I think so.
Whachall afraid of, Shrinkers?


Ten Talents For Christ / Change Or Die Conference:


April 18th, 2013  :   Change or Die IV

Rumble at The Harley-Davidson Museum  ®
400 W. Canal St.  Milwaukee, WI
1:00 to 8:00 p.m.

Tickets are free, but you must register here in advance
Email any questions to Deb at: deb@siebertfoundation.org
Click on the links for our Inspirational Speakers and Agenda




'via Blog this'

The previous story has lots of detail about this circus and the clowns therein:

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/02/new-change-or-die-gathering-for-2012.html

Classic Ichabod:



Change or Die 2012

Stories from Lutheran Ministries that Are Growing

Thursday, February 23
The Harley Davidson Museum Conference Facility

Agenda


1:00 p.m.               Registration
1:30                       Welcome, Introductions, Thanks, Instructions                       ….Rev. Mark Jeske
1:45                       The Story of St. Andrew’s, Middleton and Waunakee    ….Rev. Randy Hunter
2:15                       Discussion
3:30                       The Story of Hephatha, Milwaukee                  ..…..Rev. Mary Martha Kannass
3:00                       Discussion
3:15                       Break
3:30                       The Story of Faith, Milwaukee   …Revs. Richard Peterson and Richard Suerro
4:00                       Discussion
4:15                       The Story of Risen Savior, Milwaukee                                     .…Rev. Ken Fisher
4:45                       Discussion
5:00                       Roundtable Reflections (Cocktails)
5:30                       Dinner
6:30                       The Story of LINC Twin Cities                                                …..Mrs. Sue Hewitt
7:00                       Discussion
7:15                       The Story of Shepherd of the Hills, Pewaukee                       …..Rev. Tom Wink
7:45                       Discussion                                                                                   
8:00                       Wrap-Up

***

GJ - Hephatha, Milwaukee is ELCA. Here is one link from their ELCA partner.

Here is an ELCA news story mentioning Hephatha.

Randy Hunter is well known in WELS for the Latte Church - with the woman pastor "administering the Means of Grace."

Ken Fisher is the WELS expert on getting grant money, not that Jeske is slack on using Other People's Money.

LINC seems to be a front for ABCD, whatever that is or does.

Shepherd of the Hills is a Missouri Synod cell group congregation.

Faith, Milwaukee is another ELCA parish:

"Richard Suero student at Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago, and member of our Mission partner congregation, Faith/Santa Fe Lutheran Church in Milwaukee  (The pastor at Faith/Santa Fe is a “son of Augustana,*” Richard Peterson) the Grow-Hanson family ELCA missionaries in Senegal."

*Augustana is a Reconciled in Christ congregation.
---

Febreeze has left a new comment on your post "New Change or Die! Gathering for 2012":

I wonder if any of these are growing liturgical churches.

***

GJ - I remember when WELS had a gathering of mission congregations. One pastor was truly confessional and put up a cartoon about someone saying on a couch, "I can't stop going to Church Growth conferences." He got a severe dressing down soon after. His congregation was growing from LCMS defections. He said to me, "I hope my members all die before they find out how WELS is lying to them."

I am guessing the latest Jeske extravaganza is Thrivent-funded. It has that aroma: WELS, LCMS, ELCA.

---

David Becker has left a new comment on your post "New Change or Die! Gathering for 2012":

When I first saw this, I thought it was a parody or something that was made up, but I checked the link and it is indeed an actual event. Intrepid Lutherans reported it too.

***

GJ - David, you laugh out loud when you read Ichabod? All I need to do is report the WELS and Missouri news for LOLs and ROTFLs. They denounce ELCA for abortion and homosexual pastors while working with ELCA congregations. And I am the bad guy. LOL.

PS - This conference is connected with Ten Talents for Christ. Intrepid research and spelling:


The address of "Ten Talents for Christ" listed on their website is:

2323 N. Mayfair Rd., Suite 104

Coincidentally, that's right down the road from the synod office, and it's in the very same building as WELS Kingdom Workers:

2323 N. Mayfair Rd., Suite 400.


The Registered Agent with the State of Wisconsin of Ten Talents for Christ Inc is one -

Danae S Oldenberg, who it appears is an agent for Thrivent and who's (sic) office appears to be 2323 N Mayfair Road Suite 104.

Ten Talents for Christ Inc has not filed paper work with the state of Wisconsin to be recognized as a Charitable 501(c)3 Organization yet, but is a NonStock, Non-Profit Corporation.

Was not able to find out Board of Directors.

The above is all from Public Records available in Wisconsin.

***

GJ - I tolja it smelled like Thrivent. Big grant for the schwaermerpalooza, I promise.

4 comments:

Febreeze said...
I wonder if any of these are growing liturgical churches.
David Becker said...
When I first saw this, I thought it was a parody or something that was made up, but I checked the link and it is indeed an actual event. Intrepid Lutherans reported it too.
christfocused said...
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dana%C3%A9-oldenburg/4/0/a34

Ten Talents for Christ
2011 – Present (1 year) Milwaukee, WI
Connecting people and organizations with needs to people and organizations with resources by providing opportunities to give.

Ten Talents Calendar:
Feb. 23rd 2012
Change or Die III
Contact: Brenda Kuske
414-935-5601, brenda.kuske@thrivent.com
Description: Stories of Growing Lutheran Ministries

Sept. 16 2012
Time of Grace Fundraiser
Danae Oldenburg
414-935-5604, info@tentalentsforchrist.com
David Becker said...
Last week, I sent Christian News an article titled “WELS Divided on Mark Jeske” and several other analytical articles on Pastor Jeske. None of them were printed in the February 6 CN, but that may have been because I encouraged Pastor/Editor Otten to forward the material to Pastor Jeske/Time of Grace Ministries for a response (if they had any) and therefore they may still be in a future edition of CN. If they are never printed in CN, I might possibly forward them to you. I am also considering writing an article titled “Paul McCain Denounces Gregory Jackson as ‘False Teacher,’ ‘Cult Leader.’” CN could print a picture of you with the caption “Cult Leader.” That would be laugh out loud funny. I think that I write some laugh out loud funny stuff too—the style of humor is just a bit different from yours.

All Your Bibles Are Belong To Us.Murdoch News Corpse Unit Buying Thomas Nelson.Make Your Time, Ha Ha Ha

$
0
0

News Corp. unit buying Thomas Nelson

CEO of local company says HarperCollins brings infrastructure to grow faster
Publishing giant HarperCollins, a unit of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., has signed a deal to buy Thomas Nelson from private-equity firm Kohlberg & Co. for an undisclosed sum.
The purchase, which is expected to close later this year, will bring 213-year-old Thomas Nelson under the umbrella of one of the world's media groups and the owner of fellow Christian-oriented publisher Zondervan. Company officials on Monday said both companies will maintain separate operations, but did not comment on possible layoffs at Thomas Nelson, which employs about 600 people.
“HarperCollins’ global print and digital publishing platform, which includes e-book distribution into more than 175 markets, Print-on-Demand, Digital-to-Print at Retail, and worldwide marketing reach, provides an opportunity to further expand the readership of Thomas Nelson’s distinguished authors,” said Brian Murray, president and CEO of HarperCollins Publishers Worldwide, in a statement. “Thomas Nelson adds further balance to our existing publishing programs. Its broad inspirational appeal is a good complement to Zondervan, which will continue to publish books consistent with its mission.”
Thomas Nelson CEO Mark Schoenwald, who only took the helm of the company in April, called the acquisition "an attractive strategic fit." Schoenwald also told Publishers Weekly the deal gives his team the platforms to accelerate its digital and international growth plans, saying "they can be a multiplier for us."
Kohlberg had owned a majority of Thomas Nelson since the spring of last year, when it bought out Intermedia Partners. In announcing the deal then, Kohlberg officials said they would recruit new board members to the company. Among them: Former HarperCollins CEO Jane Friedman.
WELS does not allow anyone to admit that
Murdoch owns their precious NNIV,
but they are free to question the mental health
of anyone who dissents from their wisdom.
After all, Ski is their Sexpert.



Sexpert Ski and Two Others - Still Suing a St. Peter Freedom (WELS) Member To Silence Him, Because He Thinks Ski Should Not Get CRM Status. New Court Date - September 13th

$
0
0
Ski posted this photo, posing with Playboy nude model MariQueen,
on his Facebook wall,
so Fox Valley Lutheran School made him their sexpert
with a copied Groeschel presentation.
Essential links about Ski's behavior are here.


James Robert Skorzewski (Ex-Pastor Ski) vs. Jonathan V Donnan (Church Member)

Outagamie County Case Number 2013CV000977

Filing Date
Case Type
Case Status

 Ascending Date Order
 Descending Date Order
08-16-2013
Civil
Open
Class Code Description
Responsible Official
Harassment Restraining Order
Vander Maazen, Lisa Beth

Parties
Party Type
Party Name
Party Status
Petitioner
Respondent

Future Court Activity
Date
Time
Location
Description
Type 2
Court Official
09-13-2013
11:00 am
Family Court, Justice Center (920) 832-5057
Injunction hearing
Court
Vander Maazen, Lisa Beth

Leslye Marie Ulman vs. Jonathan V Donnan

Outagamie County Case Number 2013CV000974

Filing Date
Case Type
Case Status

 Ascending Date Order
 Descending Date Order
08-16-2013
Civil
Open
Class Code Description
Responsible Official
Harassment Restraining Order
Vander Maazen, Lisa Beth
Branch Id
30

Parties
Party Type
Party Name
Party Status
Petitioner
Respondent

Future Court Activity
Date
Time
Location
Description
Type 2
Court Official
09-13-2013
10:30 am
Family Court, Justice Center (920) 832-5057
Injunction hearing
Court
Vander Maazen, Lisa Beth


Rhonda Kay Dietzler vs. Jonathan V Donnan

Outagamie County Case Number 2013CV000975

Filing Date
Case Type
Case Status

 Ascending Date Order
 Descending Date Order
08-16-2013
Civil
Open
Class Code Description
Responsible Official
Harassment Restraining Order
Vander Maazen, Lisa Beth

Parties
Party Type
Party Name
Party Status
Petitioner
Respondent


***


GJ - St. Peter in Freedom recently called the meeting to discuss getting Ski into CRM status, so he could be officially put back on the staff, as DP Engelbrecht promised (SP Schroeder agreeing). The husband of Ski's victim objected, so four of them served the husband with papers for a restraining order. Tim Glende's was thrown out, but the other three must have gotten a delay through their lawyer. The new court date in September 13.

Ski has admitted to having this man's wife look at photos which ended up with a surprise photo of Brett Favre's naked ____.

Besides drinking like a fish, Ski has indulged in other out of control behavior and language. 

The St. Peter staffmembers claim they are "passionate about sharing Jesus," but they are really passionate about silencing opposition, as proven by their secretive, dishonest, and disgusting excommunication of another member. DP Engelbrecht approved, of course.

Someone from Ski's district designed this,
so not everyone is thrilled with St. Peter in Freedom
and its fake mission called The CORE.

Church Growth Project - WELS

$
0
0


http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/09/church-growth-project.html#comment-form

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2013

Church Growth Project


Below is a project proposal submitted by Intrepid readers Mr. Vernon Knepprath and Mr. Bryan Lidtke. Their concerns about the pervasive Church Growth theology in the WELS (among other doctrinal concerns, I would add) deserve careful investigation. A link to the original PDF document is available by clicking on the title below. Comments and discussion are welcome.
__________________________________________________________

‘Church Growth’ Inroads in the WELS as Observed on WELS Local
Church Website Home Pages 

If one is unfamiliar with the term ‘Church Growth’ (hereafter referred to as CG), it would be easy to assume that anything named CG must be a good thing, just as “church” plus “growth” would be a good thing. After all, God has commissioned us to go into “all the world” to teach and preach His saving Truth. Of course God wants more people to hear and learn the Gospel. Of course God wants more people in church worshipping Him on Sunday mornings.

But the term CG is commonly associated with a movement that is not primarily about “growing in the knowledge and truth of God’s Word.” It is primarily concerned with putting more people in the pews. And to do that, it utilizes things other than the Means of Grace – God’s Word and Sacraments. The CG movement is a danger because it leads to situations where the Means of Grace, the only means of creating and sustaining faith, are diminished to the point where there is no longer a focus on “growing in the knowledge and truth of God’s Word.”

That the CG movement has made inroads in the WELS there can be no denying. Sadly, the emphasis on buildings and programs and methodologies has become so prevalent, that it is increasingly difficult to recognize the Scriptural purpose of the church in many congregations in the WELS. This can be observed by simply looking at the home page of some WELS church websites. The prominence of CG methodology on these websites can be a good indicator of CG practices within the local church itself.

The home page of any church website gives a unique view into the purpose and mission of a church. The website home page does, and must, speak for itself. It is a unique opportunity to provide a message for visitors to the website who might never consider walking into the physical church building or calling on the telephone to inquire about services. What message will the website visitor find on a church’s home page?

With that question before us, a project is being undertaken, and is described in this proposal, to characterize websites of WELS churches to assess the message found on the website home page. The analysis is limited to only the home page of WELS church websites, and the intention is to have the analysis be simple and straightforward and factual.

The home page of a WELS church website will be assessed by looking for clear evidence of the Gospel, the Means of Grace, and confessional Lutheran standards. Specifically, the analysis will look for clear evidence of 1) the Gospel message, 2) God’s Word, 3) the Sacraments, 4) the name “Lutheran”, 5) the Lutheran Confessions and 6) the liturgical service. Further explanation of these six criteria is given in the following paragraphs:
  1. The Gospel message – we are all sinners in need of a savior, and Jesus Christ is that Savior. The Scriptural purpose of a Christian church is clear, to spread the Gospel. A church which takes that purpose seriously will have the Gospel message, in some form or fashion, on the home page of their website. CG methodology may steer clear of a specific Gospel message out of fear that acknowledging all people as sinners in need of a Savior would be offensive to some.
  2. God’s Word – the Means of Grace. God works through the Means of Grace, and that alone. In many cases a church has only one chance to proclaim God’s Word to a website visitor. That one chance is the home page. A website visitor may never go further than the home page, therefore one cannot take for granted the possibility that a website visitor will dig deeper into the web site to find God’s Word. CG methodology may steer clear of specific references to God’s Word because website visitors might not consider it “real” or “relevant” to today’s world.
  3. The Sacraments – the Means of Grace. Very few Christian churches confess and teach that the Sacraments create and strengthen faith, treating them instead as mere symbolic acts. CG methodology may steer clear of the Bible’s clear teachings about Baptism and the Lord’s Supper because they obviously conflict with the opinions of many, including many Christian churches.
  4. The Lutheran name – Those who believed and confessed as Luther did were called "Lutherans" by their enemies. Christians who believe, confess, and teach what Luther taught rightly call themselves Lutheran today (paraphrase from wels.net). CG methodology would likely not want to draw attention to the “Lutheran” in their name, if it exists, out of fear of seeming exclusive or “sect-like.”
  5. The Lutheran Confessions – Lutherans believe that Bible truths were correctly understood and shared in writings that early Lutherans provided in the Book of Concord (finished in 1580). These are known as the Lutheran Confessions. Reading these confessional statements and examining them in the light of the Bible (always the primary and central authority) is to be encouraged (paraphrase from wels.net). CG methodology would likely avoid mention of the Lutheran Confessions out of fear that they would be considered even less “real” and “relevant” than the Bible.
  6. The liturgical service – The liturgy provides the fullness and richness of God’s Word, and only God’s Word. Visitors to a liturgical church can be assured that worship services will be Scripturally sound. CG methodology would likely avoid mention of the Liturgy in an effort to appear “modern” and “in.”
For this project, each of these criteria are scored ‘green’ (strong evidence), ‘yellow’ (inconclusive evidence) or ‘red’ (no evidence or opposing CG evidence) for each church website. In some cases, comments are provided (red triangle in upper right hand corner of the cell) to explain the scoring. But where the scoring is thought to be self-evident, comments are not provided.

The following is a sample of six WELS congregations from the NW Wisconsin district (names excluded here), providing an example of the scoring matrix for the six criteria indicated above.


Along with the spread sheet scoring matrix, a screen print or “snip it” of the church website home page is captured on a PowerPoint slide. Some website home pages change frequently, while some change rarely or never. It is important that the website home page on which the scoring is based is captured (with the date) for record keeping. An example can be seen below:


The work completed on this project to date has been done by two individuals, taking into consideration suggestions and direction from others. This proposal serves as an announcement of this project and a call for assistance. Additional input is welcome. Those who wish to assist are asked to contact me at vernon.knepprath@gmail.com to coordinate and align efforts.

The project scope will include websites of a significant number of WELS congregations in each district. Analysis will be performed in a manner to minimize individual bias by having multiple inputs for each congregational website. Analysis will compare results and look for trends within each district, and compare results from district to district. With more resources, the project scope can be expanded to include more congregations in the analysis and more inputs can be provided per church website. The project could be carried out in multiple phases, with each phase including more districts or more congregations within each district.

Results could be reported many different ways. One decision yet to be made is whether scoring should be associated with individual church names, or whether identifying information be excluded from the report.

Excluding individual church names will limit the analysis to looking at general trends within a district and from district to district, and making a general assessment of the extent of CG influence in the WELS. This approach has a benefit of minimizing the potential for a defensive reaction by individual congregations that might not be happy with the scoring results assigned to their website home page. If defensiveness can be avoided, the likelihood of congregations considering the project results and adjusting their web site home pages to a more Scriptural and confessional Lutheran message might be enhanced.

Including church names and associating them directly with the scoring results has the benefit of highlighting the real divisions and variations in teaching and practice that already exist. But that emphasis might provoke defensiveness that could have the effect of inhibiting some congregations from moving to a more Scriptural and confessional Lutheran message on their website home page.

As previously stated, the purpose of this project is to characterize CG inroads in the WELS. There is obvious bias in that statement. Everything has bias. It is never a question of whether bias exists, but whether the bias is perceived to be favorable or unfavorable. The bias that exists in this project is toward faithfulness to Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions. It is a bias that I believe most faithful Christians would view as favorable. And it is a bias consistent with what the WELS and all member churches claim to be in agreement with.

While the purpose of this project is to characterize CG inroads in the WELS, there is another more positive perspective to this work. That perspective is to consider what might be good and reliable guidelines for a confessional Lutheran website home page.

Shouldn’t a home page, first and foremost, display the Gospel message? Shouldn’t one find, first and foremost, the Means of Grace, because this is what God works through to bring the lost to faith. Shouldn’t one find a confessional statement or reference? Or is our faith in God’s promises so compromised that one must promote contemporary worship on a website home page as a clever technique to draw people in. Must we on a Christian church home page advertise a preschool/daycare facility, or announce a fund raising event, or promote a life coaching seminar in place of a Gospel message, a verse from God’s Word or a confession of faith?

What is most important to a congregation should and can be found on the website home page. What is the message a church is trying to convey on its website home page? Is CG most important, or is it sharing the Gospel message to a dying world?

1 COMMENT:

Joel Dusek said...
A worthy project! A congregation's website is often the first impression visitors get, even before setting foot in the building or contacting the pastor. When searching for a congregation after leaving WELS, webpages told me much of what I needed to know to decide if I even wanted to attend a service. I considered WELS, LCMS, and unaffiliated congregations and was led to a confessional LCMS congregation.

A website not only indicates whether a congregation is confessionally Lutheran, but also the intent that the congregation has to spreading the Gospel and its devotion to CORRECT Evangelism. A site full of flashy yet meaningless content could show a shallow congregation. A site with a lot of information but none of it Christ-centered can mean the congregation itself is not Christ-centered. A page that is uninformative could mean that the congregation doesn't care if you visit or not.

Spenglergeist!

Lutherans on the purpose of Scripture | Churchmouse Campanologist

Famous ELCA Pastor Writes Book. The Future of Emergent Churches like The CORE.

$
0
0
Nadia seems to preach Nadia most of the time.

Pastrix: The Cranky, Beautiful Faith of a Sinner & Saint Hardcover


Nadia Bolz-Weber takes no prisoners as she reclaims the term "pastrix"(pronounced "pas-triks," a term used by some Christians who refuse to recognize female pastors) in her messy, beautiful, prayer-and-profanity laden narrative about an unconventional life of faith.

Heavily tattooed and loud-mouthed, Nadia, a former stand-up comic, sure as hell didn't consider herself to be religious leader material-until the day she ended up leading a friend's funeral in a smoky downtown comedy club. Surrounded by fellow alcoholics, depressives, and cynics, she realized: These were her people. Maybe she was meant to be their pastor. 

Using life stories-from living in a hopeful-but-haggard commune of slackers to surviving the wobbly chairs and war stories of a group for recovering alcoholics, from her unusual but undeniable spiritual calling to pastoring a notorious con artist-Nadia uses stunning narrative and poignant honesty to portray a woman who is both deeply faithful and deeply flawed, giving hope to the rest of us along the way. 

Wildly entertaining and deeply resonant, this is the book for people who hunger for a bit of hope that doesn't come from vapid consumerism or navel-gazing; for women who talk too loud, and guys who love chick flicks; for the gay man who loves Jesus, and won't allow himself to be shunned by the church. In short, this book is for every thinking misfit suspicious of institutionalized religion, but who is still seeking transcendence and mystery.

Ain't It a Shame, But the Intrepids Are To Blame

$
0
0
The Intrepid Lutherans promote McCain's
constant papal plagiarizing
through their endorsement of CPH.
They support UOJ and CGM by
endorsing NPH.
This Intrepid Lutherans post finds fault with WELS sending out their death squads against their blog, but never against Jeske or other miscreants. After all, DP Seifert has never told congregations they could not link Jeske's Time of Grace, Change and Die, or self-serving Changer youth programs.

As a WELS blog, the Intrepids are not fond of the LCMS, but they promote all LCMS books, even though the top political post at CPH is held by a vapid Romanizing plagiarist - Paul McCain. NPH has published a lot of pure garbage, too - such as Valleskey's hideous Church Growth UOJ textbook. But here is their listing -

Wisconsin Ev. Lutheran Synod (WELS) - File Swapping Headquarters
Northwestern Publishing House (NPH) - Fuller Kiss Ups
Evangelical Lutheran Synod (ELS) - WELS Kiss Ups
Confessional Ev. Lutheran Conference (CELC)

Their other links are just as promiscuous and undiscerning.

Educational resources:
Consortium for Classical & Lutheran Education
The Hausvater Project
Brothers of John the Steadfast - UOJ Harrison puppets who hid a felony for him.
Lutheran Science Institute
Luther Academy
Historic Lectionary
Gottesdienst - Don't Get Me Started on This One
Defending Christ (Apologetics)

Primary sources:
Luthers Werke (Weimarer Ausgabe) - Who is he?
Munich Digital Library - Who reads German?
The Works of Augustine - Like Bach, often mentioned, never tasted
Studium Excitare - A college blog? Primary grade, yes, not a primary source

What is missing? Oh - nothing about Ichabod. No link there. No mention of eight (8) volumes of Luther's sermons posted in fairly nice HTML format (no ads) or the Book of Concord also published in a convenient form.

In the course of Lutheran research I have found links to other important Lutheran works, so I have included them, all found at this navigational spot -

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/05/book-of-concord-selections-martin.html

Instead of threatening to sue people who copy my books, as CPH does, I give them away on PDF links, also listed at that spot.

Besides that, I have plenty of additional material in the left margin. Since the lying plagiarists accuse me of deceiving everyone, I provide links, evidence, and verbatim quotations.

I am not peeved, but tickled. Given the frightened, timid, quick-to-cave-in quality of the American Lutheran blogs, not being linked is the highest possible honor.

Their studied silence is not hurting readership at the Ichabode. I doubt whether their page-views match mine, even with their frantic mutual back-patting.

Nor would I argue that the silence keeps the message from filtering through. I am quite satisfied that people are well informed.

But really - if you want to denounce shunning, you should first look in the perfect mirror of the Law.





Will They Investigate the Theft of St. John Lutheran in Milwaukee?Copper thefts force youth center to close - TODAY'S TMJ4

$
0
0
Yes, Buske worshiped with Ski, Glende, and Andy Stanley
at the Drive Conference.


Copper thefts force youth center to close - TODAY'S TMJ4:

MILWAUKEE - There were no kids at Lighthouse Youth Center at North 25th Street and West Roosevelt Drive on Monday.  A string of burglaries forced the staff to temporarily close the the program. Thieves stole so many copper pipes that the plumbing system is destroyed.  
Pastor James Buske told TODAY'S TMJ4 reporter Tom Murray that the thieves hit three times in a matter of days.
 
Burglars also stole several flat screen televisions from the lounge.
 
"Just ripped it right off the wall," Buske said.  "I'm angry, but probably more frustrated in the whole thing because what really stinks about all this is it's hurting kids."
 
The thieves made a mess of an excercise room as they ripped out long stretches of copper pipes from the basement.
 
"This is the room where we've had the most damage," Buske said.  "They knocked over the weight machines."
 
Buske said the center's board and staff are committed to reopening the center as quickly as possible.
 
"I know that this neighborhood and these families in the immediate area and these kids, they want this place," he said.  "They need it open."
 
The Milwaukee Police Department is investigating.

'via Blog this'

Frosty Bivens, Fuller Alumnus - Rebukes the Truth.Repent of Telling the Truth, Foul Dungeon-Dweller

$
0
0

A simple, concise depiction of where WELS is headed. http://adam4d.com/comics/2013-08-14-amazed1.png
1Like ·  · 
  • Kimara Winters Really? Are you saying this from field experience or from some admin indications? That's not our experience out here...sad to hear it is elsewhere
  • Tim Niedfeldt Both for sure..
  • Chris J Pluger Sorry this is your experience of the WELS. It's not mine.
  • Tim Niedfeldt Indeed...it is mine. And only my opinion. And even as I am not technically in the WELS anymore...I am hiding out at a WELS church that remains confessional (I indeed hope it might go Independent or ELDoNA one day) There are plenty of places to hide out still in the WELS but the slippery slope is there and no one is stopping the synod from sliding down it.
    9 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1
  • Forrest Bivens "The Lord rebuke you!" Tim, for your slander. May God grant you repentance and renewal, with love.
    2 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Paul Rydecki My experience with the WELS was being tossed out and branded a heretic for teaching that sinners are only justified by faith in Christ. So the Lord's rebuke is certainly in order, for those who condemn His Gospel.
  • Tim Niedfeldt I just go with, "Ain't slander if it's true, I'll put that rebuke back on you"


    • Christian Schulz Amen, Pr. Rydecki.
      6 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Daniel Baker The WELS is like a parasitic vine that wraps itself around a sapling, choking out the tree's living leaves. The vine's leaves put on a good show, giving the appearance that the young tree is thriving and healthy, but at the end of the day the vine's only fruit is a dead stump. So too with the WELS. Her time is short. The Lord will not be mocked by the treachery committed against His Holy Gospel, and the rebuke He gives will not be a hypocritical Facebook comment.
      3 hours ago · Like · 1
    • Bryan Lidtke Pr. Bivens, what did Tim say that was wrong? I didn't see any lies in the statements he made...
    • Tim Niedfeldt The missing piece Bryan is that Prof. Bivens and I were both members at Victory of the Lamb. I would bet ya 2:1 he took my cartoon as a direct slander against Victory of the Lamb rather than a general indictment against the concept as opposed to my statement that the WELS is slipping. Prof Bivens has stated in other communication that he does not engage in debate, at least not in the online world, so I don't think you'll get a response from him. That is sad, as of course I would relish such a thing. 

      Of course this is one of the larger problems in the synod is it not? That no one will debate? Everything is personal, Everything is slander, everything breaks the 8th commandment. For me it never is personal. Satire as I posted, just pokes the hive a little. I have done very little public expression of angst with WELS online, but when I do it ALWAYS elicits some sort of message public or private that I should 1.) Not discuss anything negative in the WELS Online 2.) We should all just get along and treat each other in brotherly love or 3.) It is slander/breaking the 8th commandment to be critical. 

      This is of course ridiculous. If I stated something so ludicrous...say for example.....that we were "justified and forgiven our sins before we were born and before faith in Christ", that every WELS pastor would jump on my wall and show conclusively how this is a false doctrine and I should be put out of the church.  That's contending for the faith. Right now, They won't say "boo"

      We know what happens to those intrepid pastors anyways. (and if Spencer keeps it up he will be walking down Rydecki way soon enough.)
    • Scott E. Jungen Prof. Blivens how about you come visit the Core in the Northern Wisconsin District for some popcorn and Pepsi.
    • Bryan Lidtke The one thing that confuses me about your very good response Tim is why would he even comment on here if he won't engage in online debates? Wouldn't it be "the brotherly thing to do" if he sent you a private message instead? Because nothing that is said in public can be rebuked in public, of course. It would have to be addressed in a private message out of love... 
    • Bryan Lidtke Actually, Scott, they seem to have gotten rid of the popcorn. There wasn't any that I saw there when I went a few weeks ago. The woman next to me had some coffee though...

---

Photographic Evidence - WELS





St. Peter WELS, Freedom, Wisconsin
St. Peter WELS, Freedom, Wisconsin

Sexpert Ski in his liturgical finest,
delivering another superb Groeschel sermon.

They sing like crows.

Child abuse in WELS.

Another One Bites the Dust. Plus - Convention Plagiarizes ELCA Theme

$
0
0
"You need a real man to lead this denomination."


Episcopal Diocese of Quincy fades into history
Former diocese is reconfigured as the Peoria Deanery

http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=17999#.Ui_He9JtiSo

By Mary Ann Mueller 
VOL Special Correspondent 
www.virtueonline.org 
September 9, 2013

As Illinois leaves begin to get the slightest tinge of autumn color and with the silence of cat's paws, the venerable Episcopal Diocese of Quincy quietly slipped into history, forever erased from the map of Episcopal dioceses. 

On September 1 the Episcopal Diocese faded into memory to become a footnote in Anglican history now folded back into the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago.

The formal announcement of its imminent demise came on Aug. 29 through a joint press release issued by the Diocese of Chicago, giving the Anglican Communion only three days notice of the permanent change.

The Rt. Rev. Jeffrey D. Lee, Bishop of Chicago and the Rt. Rev. John C. Buchanan, Provisional Bishop of Quincy, announced today that the two dioceses would reunite on Sunday, September 1, a news release stated. 

The western Illinois diocese was birthed in 1877 to accommodate the growth and expansion of The Episcopal Church, especially among western Illinois Swedes. For nearly 136 years, the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy was a thriving, albeit small diocese in The Episcopal Church that became a bastion for Anglo-Catholicism, standing against the tide of The Episcopal Church's liberal creep. 

"Since 2008, the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy has been forging a new identity. After its former bishop and more than 60% of its members broke away to become founders of the theologically conservative Anglican Church of North America," the news release explained. "...The diocese elected (Bishop John) Buchanan, retired Bishop of West Missouri, as provisional bishop in 2009. In 2012, the diocese's leaders approached (Bishop) Lee about the possibility of reunion."

At the stroke of midnight on Pentecost XV, the 755 souls in the former diocese spread through nine congregations - All Saints, Moline; Grace, Galesburg, St. George's, Macomb; St. James, Griggsville; St. James, Lewistown; St. John's Kewanee; St. Paul's, Warsaw; as well as St. Paul's Cathedral and Bread of Life in Peoria - and a handful of clergy ceased being a part of the Diocese of Quincy and became a part of the Diocese of Chicago. At the same time, the former western Illinois diocese was reconfigured into the Peoria Deanery as a part of the Chicago diocese. The new Peoria Deanery joins ten other deaneries in the Diocese of Chicago: Aurora, Chicago-North, Chicago-South, Chicago-West, Elgin, Evanston, Joliet, Oak Park, Rockford and Waukegan. The Cathedral Church of St. Paul's was also reduced to a parish.

The death knell of the Diocese of Quincy was originally struck when the Episcopal General Convention started to make doctrinal and theologically innovations. The controversial decisions began in 1976 with the ordination of women and the slow but insidious acceptance of the gay culture. Later, the heavily revised 1979 prayer book became a lightning rod issue. Those unwelcome changes occurred around the time the Diocese was celebrating its centennial. 

Finally, in 2008 a majority of parishioners in some 18 congregations in the Diocese of Quincy voted to realign with the Southern Cone. They became a founding diocese in the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA). As a result, the membership of the Diocese plummeted from over 3,000 to 755 with an ASA of less than half that, hovering around 340.The plate and pledge income also plunged more than a million dollars from the $1.7 million figure to $605,000. The beleaguered diocese was no longer able to be self-sufficient and maintain its commitment to the Great Commission. The decision was made to reach out in order to survive.

When the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy was reorganized in 2009, retired VI Bishop of West Missouri John Buchanan was elected provisional bishop. At the same time, a Quincy Future Committee was established to determine what the long-range vision of the Quincy diocese might look like.

The western Illinois looked north to the Diocese of Chicago and west to the dioceses of Missouri and Iowa, both of which are located across the Mississippi River from the Land of Lincoln, to see what possible ministerial mergers were available. Both the Diocese of Missouri and the Diocese of Iowa are in different states where as the Diocese of Chicago is in the same state. Also the Diocese of Missouri is in Province V while the Diocese of Missouri is in Province VI. The various jurisdictional borders created interesting reunification challenges.

Once the Diocese of Quincy started making overtures to the Diocese of Chicago, a Chicago Quincy Committee was formed to dialogue with the Quincy Future Committee. It was determined that it would be easier for the Diocese of Quincy to reunite with the Diocese of Chicago then try to juncture with either neighboring Episcopal diocese across the Mississippi River. 

When the original Diocese of Illinois was formed in 1835 it encompassed the entire state. As The Episcopal Church grew in the Prairie State, the statewide jurisdiction was split into three and the dioceses of Springfield and Quincy were born. The Diocese of Quincy took its name from the city that was home to its first cathedral. The parent Diocese of Illinois was renamed the Diocese of Chicago.

Eventually, the diocesan offices were relocated from Quincy to Peoria along with the cathedral, but the diocese was not renamed. Unfortunately, at the dawn of the millennium, St. John's, the historic mother church of the Diocese in Quincy, was destroyed by fire. 

For Quincy's canonical reunification with Chicago all that was needed was the approval of both diocesan conventions and the permission of their bishops - Bishop Lee in Chicago and Bishop Buchanan in Quincy. On June 8, concurrent special conventions were held in the Diocese of Chicago and the Diocese of Quincy with a common focus on the agenda - reunification. At that time, both dioceses simultaneously voted to proceed. The next steps were taken which consisted of getting the consent of the House of Bishops and the various TEC diocesan standing committees. With the bishops' blessings and the requisite standing committees' approval, the Secretary to the House of Deputies of General Convention certified the results. At that point, the reunification was considered complete and the dioceses of Chicago and Quincy were considered to be one. These facts are then certified to the Presiding Bishop at which point the Secretary of the House of Deputies strikes the name of the Diocese of Quincy from the roll of Episcopal dioceses in union with General Convention.

Had the smaller Illinois diocese sought canonical juncture with either of the neighboring dioceses across the Mississippi River, it would have taken the action of the General Convention that meets next in 2015. The major item on the next General Convention agenda will be the election of a new presiding bishop. Quincy's juncture with either western diocese would still have been more than two years away -- time the diminished diocese did not have. 

Now that the two dioceses have become one, Bishop Buchanan will not be putting up his crozier. He will become a part time assisting bishop in the Diocese of Chicago where he'll focus his episcopal ministry in the northern parts of the Diocese of Chicago thus freeing up Bishop Lee and Assistant Bishop Christopher Epting to spend time in the new Peoria Deanery where they can be busy getting to know the lay of the land and their new people. 

LITIGATION CONTINUES

As this reunification takes place, all eyes turn to Quincy's Adams County Courthouse where the Peoria Deanery (formerly the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy) is locked in litigation with the ACNA Diocese of Quincy over property, assets, and endowment funds.

"Since March 2009, litigation has been pending in the Circuit Court of Adams County, Quincy, Illinois, seeking a declaration by the court as to the proper ownership of Diocesan assets, between the breakaway ACNA parishes and diocese, and the non-departing parishes and original Diocese of Quincy," a question and answer segment on the Diocese of Chicago website explains. "The main asset in question is the Diocesan endowment fund with a current value of about $4 million, of which more than $3 million belongs to the Diocese and the remaining amount represents funds of contributing parishes. ... Nonetheless, and despite the uncertainty that always hangs over litigation, we believe the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy is likely to prevail and that the endowment fund will stay with the Episcopal Diocese of Quincy, and thus with the reunified Diocese of Chicago." 

The same Q&A explains: "The reunion of the Diocese of Quincy with this Diocese will almost certainly have budgetary impact. ... Preliminary financial analysis has suggested that increased costs from the reunion will be offset by additional income from endowment funds and other assets which the Diocese of Quincy will bring into a reunited Diocese. ... The assets of the endowment, however, are currently frozen until the pending litigation is settled." 

In a joint letter announcing the finalized reunification, Bishops Lee and Buchannan ask for prayers.

"As we begin our life together as one diocese, please pray for us, for one another, and for our brothers and sisters who have chosen other paths," they write. "May God strengthen us for the work we have been given to do and reconcile us in the power of the Risen Christ, who overcomes all divisions." 

The newly reunified Diocese of Chicago is scheduled to hold its next diocesan convention on Nov. 22-23 in Lombard near Chicago. Fr. Alberto Cutié is to be the keynote speaker at the convention themed: Behold, We are Doing a New Thing. [ELCA theme, convention just completed] Fr. Cutié is the former charismatic Roman Catholic priest in Miami who, in the spring of 2009, was caught by the paparazzi cavorting with his girlfriend on a beach. As a result, he quickly left the Catholic Church, was readily accepted in The Episcopal Church in May, married his sweetheart in June, and has since fathered two children. One year later, in June 2010, he was received as a priest and assigned as the priest-in-charge of the Episcopal Church of the Resurrection in Biscayne Park by Bishop Leo Frade of the Episcopal Diocese of Southeast Florida.


Mary Ann Mueller is a journalist living in Texas. She is a regular contributor to VirtueOnline


BREAKING NEWS: On September 6, Adams Country Circuit Court Judge Thomas Ortbal has rendered a ruling in the Diocese of Quincy case striking down The Episcopal Church's claim that a diocese, in this case the Diocese of Quincy, cannot leave the mother church. 

The judge also solidly struck down TEC's notion that it has a top-down hierarchical structure emanating from General Convention. 

This means that Bishop Lee cannot look at what he had hoped was the assets of the ACNA Diocese of Quincy, including the $4 million endowment fund, to revert back to the Peoria Deanery for his use to sustain the deanery as it reunites with the Diocese of Chicago.

Pope Francis' No. 2: Clerical celibacy is open to discussion - World News

$
0
0
"Father Michael, it's no longer a mortal sin?"
"No, Sister Mary Perpetua Obligata."


Pope Francis' No. 2: Clerical celibacy is open to discussion - World News:


Pope Francis' No. 2: Clerical celibacy is open to discussion



Archbishop Pietro Parolin, the secretary of state of the Vatican, opens up about potential modifications to the strict traditions of priestly celibacy. Pope Francis addressed the matter last year, prior to becoming pope, saying he was in favor of maintaining the tradition "for the moment." NBC's Michelle Kosinski reports from London.
The Vatican’s new secretary of state has said that priestly celibacy is not church dogma and therefore open to discussion, marking a significant change in approach towards one of the thorniest issues facing the Roman Catholic Church.
"Celibacy is not an institution but look, it is also true that you can discuss (it) because as you say this is not a dogma, a dogma of the church," Archbishop Pietro Parolin said in response to a question during an interview with Venezuelan newspaper El Universal.

Hoang Dinh Nam / AFP - Getty Images
Archbishop Pietro Parolin is the Vatican's secretary of state.
He added that while it was not dogma, clerical celibacy was a deeply entrenched Catholic tradition.Advertise | AdChoices
"The efforts that the church made to keep ecclesiastical celibacy, to impose ecclesiastical celibacy, have to be taken into consideration," Parolin said. "One cannot say simply that this belongs in the past."
As secretary of state, Parolin is the head of government and seen as the most powerful official at the Vatican after the pontiff. 

'via Blog this'

Fuller Alumnus Frosty Bivens Should Have Resigned from the Ministry for This Travesty

$
0
0

The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship

[Prepared for the WELS National Conference on Worship, Music and the Arts
Carthage College, Kenosha, Wisconsin, July 23, 1996.]
By Forrest L. Bivens


http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BivensPrimary.pdf

The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship
1. Justification and the Power to Worship
“The article of justification is the master and prince, the lord, the ruler, and the judge over all kinds of doctrines; it preserves and governs all church doctrine and raises up our consciences before God. Without this article the world is utter darkness and death.”1 1 Martin Luther, What Luther Says, Vol. 2. p 703. 
Luther’s appraisal of the doctrine of justification is also ours. We hold  it to be the primary doctrine of Scripture, that is, the central and most important teaching revealed by Godfor us sinners.

The truth of justification, above all others, distinguishes Christianity from all other religions. If this teaching were obscured or lost, attempts to show significant differences between the Christian religion andothers would ultimately prove to be futile. Also, as revealed and emphasized in the Bible, all other doctrines either prepare for or flow from this chief article of faith. Without this truth, all others would mean little. This doctrine is the source or basis of the benefits and blessings which mankind receives from God.

What precisely is this “master and prince, lord, ruler and judge” over other doctrines? Justification is a declaratory act of God, in which he pronounces sinners righteous. As revealed in the Bible, this declaration of God is made totally by grace and on account of Jesus Christ and his substitutionary life and death on behalf of mankind. To phrase it somewhat differently, God has justified acquitted or declared righteous the whole world of sinners. He has forgiven them. They have been reconciled to God; their status in his eyes has been changed from that of sinner to forgiven sinner for the sake of Jesus Christ. Since all this applies to all people, the term universal or general justification is used. In our circles an alternate term, objective justification, is also used. If justification is universal, it must also be objective - sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not. This is precisely what Scripture teaches in Romans 3:23-24, when it says, “There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. “ All have sinned and all are justified freely by God’s grace. Romans 4:5 also teaches the grand truth that our God is the “God who justifies the wicked,” all of them. “God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them “ (2 Co 5:19). Literally, God was not counting “their” sins against them, and the only antecedent of “their” in the sentence is “the world,” which includes all people.

***

GJ - Frosty Bivens jumped up to defend Paul Kelm against slander (because I quoted Kelm, which is the same as slandering Kelm). Bivens also denied that he ever went to Fuller Seminary, even though he bragged about studying there in front of the entire Midland Circuit, which included the future DP John Seifert.

Bivens was following the example of David Valleskey, who also bragged about going to Fuller Seminary, but denied it when I asked him directly. I knew from Dave's frightened look that he was lying. Later, when the hapless David Koenig (CLC sic) got the confession from Valleskey and wrote me, Valleskey pounded him for telling the truth. Therefore, Koenig was angry with me because Valleskey was furious with him.

If you are familiar with abusive sects, this makes sense.

 

Deceit Is the Wisconsin Way of Salvation
Lying is part of the WELS style, and it begins with or is canonized in their secret hazing ritual, GA.

This essay is a pure ignorance or a blatant lie. In deference to the Eighth Commandment, I can only hope that Bivens does not know any better.But he really ought to, since he began with Luther.

This is a standard UOJ paper opening. I have seen this gambit tried many times over. How do they keep from laughing? All they all sniffing the same glue, eating the same mushrooms, huffing the same high-test gasoline?

Justification by faith is "the master and prince, the lord, the ruler, and the judge over all kinds of doctrines; it preserves and governs all church doctrine and raises up our consciences before God. Without this article the world is utter darkness and death."

However, he defined the central doctrine of the Christian Church as justification without faith. How can anyone blame that on Luther while quoting Luther, and then use a justification by faith passage to argue (without proof) that Paul teaches "precisely" that malformed bastard child of Universalism.

Frosty, above - "Justification is a declaratory act of God, in which he pronounces sinners righteous."

In case that was too subtle - 

"God has justified acquitted or declared righteous the whole world of sinners. He has forgiven them. They have been reconciled to God; their status in his eyes has been changed from that of sinner to forgiven sinner for the sake of Jesus Christ."

Let us turn it up a notch or two more, in case the rubes missed it -

"Since all this applies to all people, the term universal or general justification is used. In our circles an alternate term, objective justification, is also used. If justification is universal, it must also be objective - sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not."

Speaking of reconciliation, no one can reconcile justification by faith (The entire Bible, Paul, Luther, Book of  Concord, Post-Concord Orthodoxy) with justification without faith (Ramach, Knapp, Stephan, Walther, various sects). Or - the righteousness of faith with the righteousness whether someone believes or not.

Frosty, like all of his apostate brethren, is a false teacher who either has never understood the Gospel or has heard it and turned against it.

There is no doubt that something made him turn away from liturgical worship to a so-called church where they pass out cola and snacks as people enter.

Before Victory of the Soccer Camp Lamb, there was the pan-denominational fest at the ELCA college, funded by Thrivent.




He Could Have Been Michigan Lutheran Seminary's President. Pope Francis reaches out to atheists and agnostics - Telegraph.UOJ Is Popular in Many Denominations

$
0
0
Pope Francis




I've loved, I've laughed and cried 
I've had my fill, my share of losing 
And now, as tears subside, I find it all so amusing 
To think I did all that 
And may I say, not in a shy way, 
"Oh, no, oh, no, not me, I did it my way" 


Pope Francis reaches out to atheists and agnostics - Telegraph:

The unprecedented gesture came as his incoming number two, theVatican's newly-nominated secretary of state, said that the rule that priests should be celibate was not "a dogma of the Church" and could be open for discussion.
Francis, who has won praise for spontaneous and unusual moves during his six month papacy, wrote a lengthy letter to a newspaper, La Repubblica, which the Italian daily printed over four pages, including page one, under the simple byline "Francesco".
"God forgives those who obey their conscience," he wrote in the unprecedented letter, the latest example of the markedly different tone and style from his predecessors that he has set since being elected in March.
The 76-year-old pontiff was responding to editorials written in July and August by Eugenio Scalfari, an agnostic and the paper's founder, in which he was asked whether "the Christian God forgives those who do not believe and do not seek faith".
Mr Scalfari said he had not expected the South American pope to respond "so extensively and so affectionately, with such fraternal spirit".
The Pope wrote: "The question for those who do not believe in God is to follow their own conscience. Sin, even for a non-believer, is when one goes against one's conscience.
"To listen and to follow your conscience means that you understand the difference between good and evil."
He said that the "mercy of God has no limits" and encompassed even non-believers, but his remarks failed to impress the Italian Union of Atheists and Agnostics.
"Why should a non-believer seek legitimisation from the Pope?" the association asked.
It dismissed what it called the pontiff's "nice words" and said: "What interests non-believers is certainly not 'forgiveness' from an entity whose existence we do not trust."
The Pope's reaching out to atheists echoes a homily he delivered in May, when he said that even atheists could be welcomed into heaven. That declaration caused consternation among Vatican officials, with a spokesman later appearing to backtrack on the Pope's remarks, saying that people who do not believe in God "cannot be saved".
In a further sign that the Church is edging towards more openness, Archbishop Pietro Parolin, a Vatican diplomat who will next month become the Pope's deputy as secretary of state, said that the principle of celibacy among clergy was "ecclesiastical tradition" rather than "Church dogma" and therefore open to discussion.
The Pope has struck a more inclusive tone since taking over as leader of the world's 1.2 billion Roman Catholics in March, notably reaching out to homosexuals on his return from a week-long trip to Brazil in July.
"If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?" the Pope said.

'via Blog this'
Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>