Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live

WELS Plan - To Return Ski to The CORE. Promoted by DP Engelbrecht, Approved by SP Schroeder

$
0
0

Although Ski had to post a bond to guarantee he would appear in court in Milwaukee, and was not wanted at Jeske's St. Marcus, he was kicked upstairs to Appleton.

WELS allowed Ski to pretend he had his own mission with The CORE, when he was just another staff member at St. Peter in Freedom, Wisconsin, part of the degenerate Fox Valley WELS circuit, where plagiarizing false teachers is not only the norm, but defended by DP Engelbrecht (aka Deputy Doug).

First Ski supposedly quit in December, then again officially in April. I have never known of a Synod President getting directly involved in a congregation, but Schroeder did that to cut a deal with Fox Valley. Engelbrecht wanted Ski back at The CORE, which is what he promised St. Peter in Freedom.

According to Deputy Doug, not the most honest person in the world, Schroeder agreed to this.

Doug has always gone out of his way to protect and promote Glende and Ski, the second being the Fox Valley Lutheran High School sex expert. Doubtless parents are rejoicing that a man kicked out of the ministry for sexual harassment and drinking on the job was their children's spiritual guide at the parochial high school.

Whoopy worship leads to whoopy education.

Now Ski is the Prodigal Son, according to DP Doug, repentant and purified by several months of paid vacation. Church and Changers coached him in how to be a good pastor:

  • Like Kelm?
  • Like Jeske?
  • Like Larry Olson?
  • Like William Tabor?
  • Like Jeff Gunn?


Martin Luther College (WELS) Album

$
0
0
"No matter how they teach it, UOJ makes no sense.
That's OK, I am going to borrow $80,000 to learn Day Care Management."

Nass explains, "And that is how we avoided a NO! vote on the NNIV.
We are so crafty."

Jeff Schone has not replaced the burnt out light
in his closet.

Zarling told the parents, "If you are connected to
Church and Change, your kid can get away with anything.
Otherwise, forget it."
"We have a great idea for a video."
Zarling, thinking hard, "Yes, I think there is a Book of Concord on campus somewhere.
Try the library, but remember - the Book of Concord is boring and irrelevant."

Essential Links to The CORE Scandal, Plus Plagiarism at St. Peter (WELS) in Freedom

$
0
0

After All, Mega-Churching Is a Business.

$
0
0


Mega-church downsizes, cuts non-essential members - LarkNews.com - A Good Source for Christian News:


WINSTON-SALEM — Julie and Bob Clark were stunned to receive a letter from their church in July asking them to “participate in the life of the church” — or worship elsewhere.

“They basically called us freeloaders,” says Julie.

“We were freeloaders,” says Bob.

In a trend that may signal rough times for wallflower Christians, bellwether mega-church Faith Community of Winston-Salem has asked “non-participating members” to stop attending.

“No more Mr. Nice Church,” says the executive pastor, newly hired from Cingular Wireless. “Bigger is not always better. Providing free services indefinitely to complacent Christians is not our mission.”

“Freeloading” Christians were straining the church’s nursery and facility resources and harming the church’s ability to reach the lost, says the pastor.

“When your bottom line is saving souls, you get impatient with people who interfere with that goal,” he says.
Faith Community sent polite but firm letters to families who attend church services and “freebie events” but never volunteer, never tithe and do not belong to a small group or other ministry. The church estimates that of its 8,000 regular attendees, only half have volunteered in the past 3 years, and a third have never given to the church.

“Before now, we made people feel comfortable and welcome, and tried to coax them to give a little something in return,” says a staff member. “That’s changed. We’re done being the community nanny.”

Surprisingly, the move to dis-invite people has drawn positive response from men in the community who like the idea of an in-your-face church.

“I thought, ‘A church that doesn’t allow wussies — that rocks,’” says Bob Clark, who admires the church more since they told him to get lost.

He and Julie are now tithing and volunteering. “We’ve taken our place in church life,” he says. •

'via Blog this'


Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 10:23-37. The Good Samaritan

$
0
0
The Good Samaritan, by Norma Boeckler

The Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity, 2013


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 281     The Savior Calls               1:29
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #259            Flung to the Heedless Winds 1:64 

The Savior Is the Good Samaritan

The Communion Hymn # 308 Invited, Lord, by Boundless Grace                    1:63
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 464     Blest Be the Tie That Binds            1:39 

KJV Galatians 3:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. 19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

KJV Luke 10:23 And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see: 24 For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? 27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. 28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. 29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.

33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.


Thirteenth Sunday After Trinity

Lord God, heavenly Father, we most heartily thank Thee that Thou hast granted us to live in this accepted time, when we may hear Thy holy gospel, know Thy fatherly will, and behold Thy Son, Jesus Christ! We pray Thee, most merciful Father: Let the light of Thy holy word remain with us, and so govern our hearts by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may never forsake Thy word, but remain steadfast in it, and finally obtain eternal salvation; through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.



The Savior Is the Good Samaritan

KJV Luke 10:23 And he turned him unto his disciples, and said privately, Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see: 24 For I tell you, that many prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

The introduction to this parable is significant, because the opening verses point to the significance of this Gospel lesson.

The Parable of the Good Samaritan must be important because it is often taught exactly wrong. What Luke preserves as a perfect example of the Gospel is almost always taught as Law. Every religion in the world is a religion of Law, - except the Christian faith. In other words, those religions teach what man must do for God, not what God has done for man.

Therefore, the Law salesmen always make this an occasion for making everyone feel guilty about how little they have done. The latest example is having the new senior pastor arrive in church as a homeless man so he could shame everyone about how little they did for him when they saw him as a poor, dirty hobo. If motivating people through the Law actually worked, we would have a perfect world by now, but it does not.

Jesus admonished His disciples so they would realize they were a very special era, in which God’s grace would be revealed before their eyes. They would hear the Gospel and see the divine power of the Savior. In fact, hardly anyone got to see and hear all of this. Crowds got to hear and see some things, but they varied. The disciples had three years of training, with all the public events and the private teaching as well.

Three years is often the maximum amount of coursework for a doctorate, and no one is tutored privately so extensively. The disciples had unique opportunities and training. And they witnessed miracle after miracle, with everything being explained to them.

Because the world groaned under the weight of sin and the Law, their experience was unique, because that time was coming to a close and they witnessed it. The prophets and kings of the Old Testament – even of the ancient world – longed to know this spiritual wisdom from God, and the disciples had a full measure of it.

Alexander the Great, 300 years before, risked his life just to visit the ancient oracle of Egypt (since Greeks looked to Egypt for its earlier knowledge). The Parthenon is beautiful, but what was that compared to one pyramid? Of course, the pagan oracle was a sham, but the site attracted the soldier who conquered the world.

So much greater is it to hear the words of Jesus and to see Him at work.

As I have written before, other world religions have a poor grasp of their founder and little valid information about the founder’s life, if he even existed (as in Taoism). But in Christianity God has preserved the life and teachings of Jesus, revealing them through men who lived at the same time. Although secular historians will not acknowledge the Holy Spirit, they have to agree that the New Testament is remarkable in its factual precision. Thus God has established His Gospel so that no one can assail it. Many do and find themselves converted to the faith or driven mad by their increasing hardness of heart and spiritual blindness. How else can someone explain former pastors who dedicate their lives to mocking the Christian faith, spending money to undermine their former faith, which they pledged to teach?


25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? 26 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? 27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. 28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. 29 But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?

The lawyer is an interesting character. He is clearly not the model for how we should think about the Gospel, because his question is, “What must I do to be saved?” not “What must I believe?” And this lawyer’s question catches some because listeners will start with that law question and see the Good Samaritan as a fine example of making everyone feel terrible about breaking the Law of God.

But the beginning of the parable is also an example of why we need to read in context, because of this phrase – “but he, willing to justify himself.” We know that no one can justify himself. Only God can do that through the Word. So the lawyer was eager to portray himself as a fine fellow and gain the praise of everyone.

Jesus turned the question on the lawyer. What is written in the Law? The man answered according to the well known summary of the Two Tables. The First Table governs our love of God, the Second Table our love of our neighbor. The Old Testament, rabbis, and Jesus agreed about this.

The Jewish tradition is to challenge the teacher, which is good for the teacher and the audience. The lawyer did not ask about God. He skipped over that issue altogether, as if to say, “I have the First Table down through my obedience and pure life. I only need a good definition of neighbor. Who is my neighbor.”

 

This parable depends on the relationship between believing and doing. They are not separate but connected by the Word of God. Believing in the Triune God means serving our neighbor out of thanksgiving for all our blessings.

In contrast, a law religion will teach people that they are loved by God for all they do. And this leads people to think of themselves as exceptional for performing all the necessary works of the law.

So the question “who is my neighbor” is given a strange twist from the start by naming the key character, the good one, as a certain Samaritan. And the victim is “a certain man.” The word “certain” gives away the story as a parable, a spiritual story with great meaning. Everyone loves to hear stories, and we remember stories better than the purely abstract lesson within the story. But the story details make us remember the lesson itself.

30 And Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.

A famous LCA pastor, Franklin D. Fry, said the meaning of this parable was that we should make the road to Jericho safe. The Social Gospel Movement (all law) taught that, but Jesus did not. In fact, there is not even a hint of that imaginary lesson in the parable.

A man fell among thieves – it was not his fault. They robbed him and beat him, leaving him half dead on the road. There he would have died without help. His own countrymen, religious leaders, crossed the road to pretend they never saw him. They acted, of course, but they acted to avoid seeing his misery and taking time for him. This is how the law can work on law salesmen – I did not see it, so that is why I did nothing.

The man’s condition is our condition without the Gospel. We cannot help ourselves. We are weak, helpless, dying. The healers-by-law are no help. Some say, “You need more self-esteem,” which is difficult to manage while perishing. Others have a program for solving all problems. Every day I am promised a chance to make $8,000 a month from home – but I do not want to be a mortgage broker.

Luther:

28. The man who here lies half dead, wounded and stripped of his clothing, is Adam and all mankind. The murderers are the devils who robbed and wounded us, and left us lying prostrate half dead. We still struggle a little for life; but there lies horse and man, we cannot help ourselves to our feet, and if we were left thus lying we would have to die by reason of our great anguish and lack of nourishment; maggots would grow in our wounds, followed by great misery and distress.

I have to wonder about the two religious leaders, too. Obviously this is a pointed example of where Pharisaical law had misled the people. If that certain man is not a neighbor, the religious leader owes him nothing.

So many victims of abusive churches are left on the side of the road today, beaten, robbed, and left to die. Worst of all, they are in danger of losing all faith, because the pious members and clergy think right is wrong, wrong is right. Many know what is going on, but they pass by on the other side after looking. That is the result of preaching the synod instead of the Gospel.

33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, 34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was

The certain Samaritan is a figure of Christ. Every action of the Samaritan shows us what the Savior does for us.

First – He comes to us, because we are too weak to come to Him. He provides the Gospel and faithful teachers so we can hear His Word of forgiveness through the cross.

When I wondered what was going wrong in the LCA, a pastor resigned and left about 30 boxes of books to be removed from his parish. LCA members retrieved them and I sorted through them. One was co-authored by an LCA missionary I knew personally. I heard him preach. He did not pass by on the other side of the road. His article was in a book by John W. Montgomery, another man I got to know later – someone who bought all the books I wrote.

There is always someone out there to help those beaten up on the road to Jericho.

Jesus comes to us through the Word and Sacraments, always through the visible and invisible Word, through His helpers. We have the privilege of conveying that message which belongs to God alone.

when he saw him, he had compassion on him,

When we are wounded and weak, Jesus does not blame us and tell us how we had that coming to us. After all, that is what friends and relatives are for. Instead, He has compassion on us when He sees us in this condition.

Those with a weak and battered faith can pray for relief and they will be answered by God and given help.

Others are so lost and blind that they do not know where to go for help. But that can be just like the underground tunnels of the Mayo Clinic. All the staffers seem to be trained to look for the confused stare, because the place is an underground marvel, but also a maze. My wife and I never spent more than a few seconds wondering where to go before a staffer said, “Are you lost? Let me help.”

Faithful Christians help the lost, even when they are so lost that they reject help in a hostile, aggressive manner.

Someone in a stupor from falsehood should be agitated, confused, angry, and too quick to fight against help. That should be expected.

Compassion means to suffer with. No one knows that better than Christ, who became the Samaritan for us, Isaiah 53 – rejected, mocked, beaten, yet suffering for our sins and rising from the dead to give us eternal life.

34 And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

The medicine of the day was to use wine to kill bacteria and oil to start the healing. People are still using alcoholic drinks today for emergency medicine (externally) and oil to heal skin problems.

Luther saw the oil as the soothing and healing of forgiveness. The wine is the sharpness of the cross, which follows faith in Christ. When a Mormon became a believer, his wife threw him out of the house. The cross was a bitter one for him and he could have abandoned this new faith. But his wife read the booklets that converted him and welcomed him back, because she became a believer too.

Jesus initiates everything through His chosen instruments of grace and faithful followers.

set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

The law salesmen of today, even when they pose as Gospel ministers, ask, “What can you do for me?”

But the Samaritan does far more than the initial first aid. Here are three more actions.

Luther:

32. But Christ, the true Samaritan, takes the poor man to himself as his own, goes to him and does not require the helpless one to come to him; for here is no merit, but pure grace and mercy; and he binds up his wounds, cares for him and pours in oil and wine, this is the whole Gospel from beginning to end. He pours in oil when grace is preached, as when one says: Behold thou poor man, here is your unbelief, here is your condemnation, here you are wounded and sore. Wait! All this I will cure with the Gospel. Behold, here cling firmly to this Samaritan, to Christ the Savior, he will help you, and nothing else in heaven or on earth will. You know very well that oil softens, thus also the sweet, loving preaching of the Gospel gives me a soft, mild heart toward God and my neighbor, so that I risk my bodily life for the sake of Christ my Lord and his Gospel, if God and necessity require it.

33. But wine is sharp and signifies the holy cross that immediately follows.

he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

So the Samaritan does the initial rescue but also stays to care for the man and promises to return to help even more, after giving some money in advance for the care provided at the inn.

This superabundance of detail and help shows us how much God does to keep us in the fold after gathering us into the flock.

 

We see the shepherd at work in Sassy. She helped rescue a lost little boy, licking his tears and kissing his face, walking him back to his home with me. The next time she saw him on the street, she ran to him to renew the friendship and kiss his face.

Like it or not, the boy is now part of her growing flock. She constantly reaches out to befriend more people and dogs. It is her nature to care for others, to protect them, to keep them safe, and bring them home. How much more is the Savior dedicated to bring us home as well?

36 Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? 37 And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.

Oh, this fools so many false teachers, who want to close with “Do likewise,” while ignoring the work of the Savior.

This parable answers – Who is the neighbor? But not in the way that the law-mongers want. Christ is the neighbor, becoming the Samaritan for us, dying on the cross for our sins, taking rejection, mockery, and sorrow.

Therefore, faith in Him is the beginning of all good works. To understand the Samaritan is to see Christ. Turning the Samaritan into another law-giver is converting the Savior into Moses and making Moses into our Redeemer – if we only do enough, give enough, and sacrifice enough.

 

Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity
Covenant and Grace

"The Old Testament dealt with the promises of God to the chosen people. Thereby God placed Himself in 'covenant' relation to Israel (berith). This relation, like the promises and the gifts of God to Israel, is always onesided. It is always God's covenant, not Israel's, and not a mutual agreement, not a suntheke. This promise and covenant indeed obligates Israel, and Israel assumes these obligations, but the covenant emanates entirely from God."
            R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of the Epistle to the Hebrews, Columbus: Lutheran Book Concern, 1938, p. 235. Hebrews 7:22;        

"To be sure, Baptism is so great that if you turn from sins and appeal to the covenant of Baptism, your sins are forgiven. Only see to it--if you sin in this wicked and wanton manner by presuming on God's grace--that the judgment does not lay hold of you and forestall your turning back. And even if you then wanted to believe and trust in your Baptism, your trial might by God's decree, be so great that faith could not stand the strain. If they scarcely remain in the faith who do no sin or who fall because of sheer weakness, where will your brazen wickedness remain, which has challenged and mocked God's grace? Let us, therefore, walk with care and fear that we may hold fast the riches of God's grace with a firm faith and joyfully give thanks to His mercy forever and ever. Amen."
            Martin Luther, What Luther Says, An Anthology, 3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, I, p. 57. Treatise on Baptism, 1519  

"And, in a word, it remains eternally true what the Son of God says, John 15:5: Without Me ye can do nothing. And Paul, Philippians 2:13: It is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure. To all godly Christians who feel and experience in their hearts a small spark or longing for divine grace and eternal salvation this precious passage is very comforting; for they know that God has kindled in their hearts this beginning of true godliness, and that He will further strengthen and help them in their great weakness to persevere in true faith unto the end."
            Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, II. 14. Free Will Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 885. Philippians 2:13; John 15:5      

"These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the Father, and are eternally saved."            
Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 10 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 919.        

"Moreover, neither contrition nor love or any other virtue, but faith alone is the sole means and instrument by which and through which we can receive and accept the grace of God, the merit of Christ, and the forgiveness of sins, which are offered to us in the promise of the Gospel."

            Formula of Concord, Thorough Declaration, III 31 Righteousness Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 925. 


Church installs “new” pipe organ | Good Shepherd Lutheran Church

$
0
0
Church installs “new” pipe organ | Good Shepherd Lutheran Church:

Church installs “new” pipe organ

DSC_0012_modified
Church organist and music director, Ron Wellander, plays the congregation’s “new” pipe organ.
While many churches are moving away from traditional forms of worship to praise bands and less-formal styles of music, one church in Rogers still sings the liturgies and hymns churches have sung for centuries, and the church members recently moved and installed a pipe organ as another means to give glory and praise to God in their worship services.
While it’s not the size organ that fills huge cathedrals with majestic sound, the five-rank, two-manual, 388-pipe, unit organ recently installed at Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in Rogers can fill the small church with beautiful sounds and works well for leading the congregation in worship as it chants the ancient liturgies and sings Scriptural and time-tested hymns in its worship services.
The organ was originally built by Don Hoyer, of Lawrence, Kan., in the latter part of the 20th century and most recently installed for use at Faith Church in Bentonville. When Faith discontinued its traditional worship services, the pipe organ sat idle and took up space needed for a sound board.
Though Good Shepherd, a small independent Lutheran congregation, had a smaller plug-and-play pipe organ, the need for repairs and improvements to the console led to looking at purchasing a little bit bigger organ to better serve the congregation. And, it so happened that Faith in Bentonville had a pipe organ to sell.
Buy the organ and move it. That sound’s simple, right? But not so!
While moving large musical instruments can take some expertise and muscle, moving a pipe organ is a far bigger project than most would imagine. The organ must be carefully disassembled, pipe by pipe and control by control and reassembled again at its new location. The job is so complex that moving and installing an organ is often as costly as the price of the organ itself.
“I don’t think most of us quite understood what we were getting into when we decided to purchase the organ from Faith,” said Randy Moll, pastor at Good Shepherd congregation. “I knew it would take a lot of work, but I was unaware of all the wiring and connections which would have to be unsoldered and then resoldered again after the move.”
There were more than 500 soldered connections, all necessary for the keyboard to open valves and allow air from the wind chests to blow through the selected pipes.
Under the supervision and guidance of Ron Wellander, the congregation’s organist and music director, members of the congregation carefully disassembled the pipe organ at Faith and moved it to Good Shepherd in Rogers, cleaned the pipes and helped set them up. Then Wellender, with the assistance of Ron Hiebert, a church member who had repaired organs, resoldered all the wiring connections between the console and the pipe organ action. The organ was tested and tuned, with numerous repairs made along the way. The process took several months.
“We couldn’t have done it without the assistance of Chris Emerson and the folks at Quimby Pipe Organs in Warrensburg (Mo.),” Wellander said. “They loaned us pipe trays to move all the pipes, and Chris gave me technical advice by phone whenever I had questions or problems,” Wellander said.
And if the congregation hadn’t had enough of organ moving, members of the congregation also moved their old pipe organ to another church and set it up there, with Wellander working on it until it was playing music at its new home.
Lutheran churches have a rich heritage of liturgy and hymnody which has given rise to much coral and instrumental music. The pipe organ has been an integral part of this heritage.
To dedicate its “new” organ, Good Shepherd Lutheran Church is planning a special service at 3 p.m. on Sunday, Aug. 25. Wellander will play the instrument and lead the congregation in singing a number of hymns. Pastor Moll will share some words from Scripture and lead the congregation in prayer. Everyone is invited to the dedication service. Refreshments will follow.
The church is located at 2305 S. Dixieland Road in Rogers (across from Rogers High School).
DSC_0037_modified
One group of pipes (pictured above) is positioned next to the console. The other is above the chancel area of Good Shepherd Lutheran Church.

Details about the organ

Five rank, two manual, unit organ by the late Don Hoyer of Lawrence, Kansas.
Positiv Division: 8′ Hohlflute; 4′ Hohlflute; 2′ Gedeckt; 1 1/3 Quint (Hohlflute); 1′ Principal; 8′ Fagot.
Great Division: 8′ Principal; 8′ Gedeckt (wood); 8′ Hohlflute; 4′ Principal; 4′ Gedeckt; 2 2/3 Quint (Gedeckt); 2′ Principal; 1′ Hohlflute; 8′ Fagot; 4′ Fagot.
Pedal Division: 16′ Bourdon; 8′ Principal; 8′ Gedeckt; 4′ Choralbass; 4′ Gedeckt; 2′ Principal; 2′ Gedeckt; 8′ Fagot; 4′ Fagot.
388 Pipes
4 Combination Pistons
Though the audio quality of the following video is not good (taken with a cell phone), it does show the location of the organ and pipes.



'via Blog this'

St. Peter - WELS - Freedom, Wisconsin: Over 1,000 Views in a Week.

$
0
0

Socialism Makes Us Passive Worshipers of the Institution. Socialism Is the Opiate of the People

$
0
0
"What peanut?"
I was talking to Lutheran about people passively accepting the worst society has to offer.

Socialism encourages people to covet the most comfort and security for the least amount of work. That leaves everyone growling that they cannot get even more benefit for even less risk and labor.

Synods are just as socialistic as government. People give up the power to call so they can rely on Holy Mother Synod to tell them who is a good pastor. The few clergy and laity with real power love this system, because they can keep everyone out or on the bottom, so they enjoy the benefits without the difficulties. Bearing the cross is for suckers, they think.

The so-called conservative synods routinely carry out crimes that would have had their leaders swinging from the yard arm, years ago - stealing property, promoting unrepentant drunks as born-again saints, abusing minors and covering it up.

Socialism makes people passively accept poverty in exchange for a sense of security, even though the State giveth and the State taketh away.

Synods generate passivity by taking away tax dollars (your mission offerings) and returning a tiny portion of them, managing the pension and health benefits of the worker bees, and funding the equivalent of overblown federal projects - mostly devoted to their own glory.

Synod socialism is an opiate because people stop thinking, "We could go on our own and trust the Word."

When the confessional crisis hit the General Synod, half of the congregations and pastors left to form their own group (General Council) and their own seminary (Philadelphia). They were so influential that the ones they left behind had to become more Lutheran to effect a re-union in 1917.



Concordia Health Plan and ObamaCare

$
0
0
"The doctor will see you now, Ben Dover."


Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Crippling Costs Related to Sky-High LCMS Seminary Tuition Loans

comment:

The Concordia Health Plan is definitely a Cadillac plan that in 2018 will be excised taxed at a rate 40% on the amount over $27,000 for a family plan. The family plan means two or more persons are covered. In 2014 the CHP plan is supposed to cost $33,228 for a family. That means the excise tax would be $2,491 if the same rates apply in 2018. So the plan plus tax would cost the congregation $35,719 per year come 2018!:

Excise Tax on High-Cost Coverage (Cadillac Tax):
http://www.uhc.com/united_for_reform_resource_center/health_reform_provisions/excise_tax_on_high_cost_coverage.htm

------------

High-End Health Plans Scale Back to Avoid ‘Cadillac Tax’:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/business/cadillac-tax-health-insurance.html?pagewanted=all

Although the tax does not start until 2018, employers say they have to start now to meet the deadline and they are doing whatever they can to bring down the cost of their plans. Under the law, an employer or health insurer offering a plan that costs more than $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family would typically pay a 40 percent excise tax on the amount exceeding the threshold.

St. Peter Freedom - WELS - Posts Have 1200 Plus Views.Will the Staff Show Up in Court To Sue Their Own Member?

$
0
0

Is It a Personal Attack To Claim Jack Kilcrease Rejects Justification by Faith?

$
0
0
The Illinois ELCA bishop did not appreciate this graphic.
Faith in Moline sent it "by mistake" and apologized.
The bishop explained their departure as mental illness.

A new Lutheran seminary was promoting itself on Facebook, so I asked if any of the faculty taught justification by faith. The moderator said, "All of them do."

I looked over the list and wrote back, "Jack Kilcrease does not."

I received a private message from the moderator saying, "I run 12 businesses and I won't allow ad hominem attacks."

I responded, "His rejection of justification by faith is a fact, not a personal attack. You do not know what ad hominem means."

--

I was corresponding with a Moline classmate, who mentioned her mother's church leaving ELCA. It turned out to be Faith in Moline, a church I walked by on the way to high school. (I walked two miles in the snow all winter, and it was uphill both ways.)

I took a big interest in that situation and created the graphic above for them, since the bishop was using personal attacks while accusing them of violating the Eighth Commandment. One of their leaders sent it to the bishop's office "by mistake" and got an enraged response. He and I found it endlessly amusing, since the same bishop was so busy undermining a faithful pastor.

--

All apostate denominations work the same way. When Pastor Lange in Columbus was taking St. Paul German Village out of the ALC, for Scriptural reasons, the denomination kept wondering in correspondence about Lange's health.

I have heard from several Wisconsin Synod exiles who got the mental health gambit from the same thugs who support Ski and other reprobates. I told them they were blessed to be away from such leaders, but I know those accusations leave lasting wounds.

After enough experience with apostasy, the faithful experience the same crafts and assaults recycled by synod drones, learned from their Father Below.

Not much is required to enrage the functionaries. Simply questioning them (past the naive inquiry) is an outrage and must be punished. Standing up to their corruption, errors, lies, and cover-ups is an automatic excommunication. That is why they say, "Write a letter." They want written evidence of the terrible crimes "hurting the face" of Holy Mother Sect. I borrowed "hurting the face" from Gaylin Schmelling, whose conscience is easily affected by the hopes of a promotion.

--

The extent of denial still intrigues me. Lutheran leaders spend their lives at war against Luther and justification by faith, but they explode with rage when that demonic quest is exposed. If their cause is so noble, why do they deny it? They must be ashamed of their actions and words. They should be.

I was reading a book on Paul's letters. One paragraph mentioned his use of faith 200 times, but the UOJ stylists want us to understand that Paul taught justification without faith.

The book described Paul separating mankind in two camps - in Adam, and in Christ. Obviously, to most people, the difference is faith. Those who trust in Christ for their salvation are "in Christ." Yet Jay Webber wants to say that every cannibal, polytheist, and atheist is "in Christ." Shouting "in Christ" does not make it so.

Mequon is so perverted that they mark justification by faith passages as MISLEADING! so the little ones do not persist in their adherence to justification by faith.

The results are all around, from Joel Hochmuth to Ski to Jeff Gunn.

817
492
215
179
176

Alas, the sermon I am posting from Luther tonight is packed with positive references to faith. I fear for Mequon if anyone reads that sermon. They may have to fire their inept and inebriated faculty and hire some Lutherans.

Mequon, beware.

Mequon Kinder - Do Not Read the Marked Portions of This Luther Sermon for Trinity 14. The Paragraphs Will Undermine Your Unfaith

$
0
0
The thankful leper, by Norma Boeckler



Luther's Sermon for the FOURTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Luke 17:11-19.


In 1521 Luther published a sermon in pamphlet form on “The Ten Lepers,” of which the following is a part. The sermon here given is found in all editions of Luther’s Church Postil. The rest of the sermon of 1521 is printed in Luther’s miscellaneous sermons. Erl. 14, 41; W. 11, 2113; St. L. 11, 1572.

Text: Luke 17:11-19. And it came to pass, as they were on the way to Jerusalem, that he was passing along the borders of Samaria and Galilee. And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, who stood afar off: and they lifted up their voices, saying, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us. And when he saw them, he said unto them, Go and show yourselves unto the priests. And it came to pass, as they went, they were cleansed. And one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, with a loud voice glorifying God; and he fell upon his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he was a Samaritan. And Jesus, answering said, Were not the ten cleansed? but where are the nine? Were there none found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger? And he said unto him, Arise, and go thy way; thy faith hath made thee whole.

CONTENTS:

THE MIRACLE OF CLEANSING THE TEN LEPERS, IN WHICH IS PORTRAYED THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN LIFE, WITH ALL ITS INCIDENTS AND SUFFERINGS.
I. THE PORTRAYAL OF THE BEGINNING OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE.

Here there are two principal parts. The order Luke followed in describing the Journeys of Christ. 1-3.

I. These Two Parts In General. 4.

II. These Two Parts In Detail. 5-30.

A. Of Faith.

1. Faith and its attributes. a. The first characteristic and attribute of faith, and how they are discovered in the lepers. 5-9. b. The second characteristic and attribute of faith, and how they are seen in the ten lepers. 10-11. c. The third characteristic and attribute of faith, and how they appear in the ten lepers. 12-14.

1. Incentives to faith. 15-17.

B. Of Love.

1. How Christ requires this love of his followers. 18f.

2. This love and faith compose the whole Christian life. 19-20.

3. This love is a mark of true Faith and of the friendship of God. 21-23.

4. How Christ teaches us the works of love by his example. a. The first work. 24-25. b. The second work. 26-27. c. The third work. 28-30.

II. THE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE.

I. The Necessity of This Development and Growth. 31.

II. The Foundation and Cause of This Development and Growth. 32f.

* The Temptations to which faith is subject.

1. It can easily cause your fall.

33. 2 . Because of it faith should increase and grow firmer. 34-35.

3. It continues as long as man lives.

* Where God appears to be the farthest away he is the nearest. 37-38.

* The great harm that follows where one loses his faith.

* Faith and Works.

1. Faith cannot fail.

2. Faith and not works makes us pleasing to God. 41-43.

3. Faith is not idle, but ever active.

4. The works of faith are spontaneous. 43.

III. How this Growth and Progress are Taught in the Example of the Samaritan.

A. In his returning to give thanks.

1. How it shows his great love.

2. Why the other nine did not return with the Samaritan. 45f.

3. The barriers laid In the way of returning. a. The first barrier. 45.49. b. The second barrier.

* Of the temptation of faith. (1) The first form of temptation.

51. (2) The second form.

52. (3) The third form.

53. (4) How one should conduct himself in these temptations. 54-55.

4. How his return shows the excellent faith of the Samaritan.

* What answer we are to give the Papists, when they say we must hear them, because the lepers were directed to the priests. 57-58.

B. In his knowledge of the kindness shown him and in the praise and gratitude he offers to God.

1. Why the Evangelist ascribes to the Samaritan a knowledge of the help with the praise of it and denies it to the others. 59-61.

2. How this knowledge and praise teach what is the true divine worship. 62-63.

3. How this knowledge and praise compared with the returning of the Samaritan. 64f.

4. The nature of this knowledge and praise. 65-67.

* Of the hatred, which the Christians must suffer for the sake of Christ. 67-68.

* Of the praise of God. 69-71.

* The Christian life far surpasses the natural life.

5. Why the Evangelist in the narrative of this knowledge and praise adds the nature of the person in whom it is to be found. 73f.

* Of the two kinds of people God serves. 73-75.

6. Christ’s conduct in the presence of this knowledge and praise. a. His conduct in itself. b. How Christ here comforts his own. 77.

C. How his conduct teaches us several good lessons. 78-80.

* Concerning faith, love and hope. 81-83.


SUMMARY OF THIS GOSPEL:

1. The Papists, contrary to God and the Scriptures, use this Gospel lesson to enforce the compulsory confession of sin, Just as if we were Jews and priests, descendants of the Levites. These lepers were not commanded that they should show their leprosy, but that they were cleansed and should do it according to the law. They were not cleansed by the priests, but in that they go to the priest according to the word and command of Christ, they became cleansed. Therefore they were cleansed through the command of Christ while on the way, and not by showing themselves to the priests; as Christ said to the one who returned and gave thanks. The others were not praised, but only the Samaritan who returned and ascribed all to the true priest. Consequently those, who wish to establish from this the Romish confession, show that they are blasphemers and perverters of the Word of God, who, since they have no argument in their favor, seek everywhere to maintain their tyranny with might and force.
2. Here you have a difference between those who are helped by the evangelical Word. Some acknowledge the grace, but some trust in the works of the law, and return not again to Christ; therefore outwardly they are considered clean and healthy..

I. THE PORTRAYAL OF THE BEGINNING OF THE CHRISTIAN LIFE OR CHARACTER.

1. St. Luke excels the other Evangelists in that he not only describes Christ’s work and doctrine like they, but also observes the order of his journeys and circuits. His Gospel to the thirteenth chapter shows how Christ began at Capernaum to preach and do wonders, whither he moved from Nazareth and where he made his home, so that Capernaum is called his city in the Gospel. From there he went out everywhere, into cities and villages, preaching and working miracles. After he had accomplished all his work and had preached over the whole country, he prepared to go up to Jerusalem. This journey to Jerusalem he describes from the end of the ninth chapter to the close of his Gospel, how Christ during this journey preached and worked miracles. For this is Christ’s last journey, and was finished in his last year at the close of his life. This is what he means here when he says: “And it came to pass, as they were on the way to Jerusalem, that he was passing along the borders of Samaria and Galilee.” That is to say, this miracle he performed during his last journey to Jerusalem.

2. Now this was not the direct road from Capernaum to Jerusalem. For Galilee is north of Jerusalem, and Samaria is south of Galilee, and Capernaum is in Galilee. The Evangelist with special pains desires to show that he did not journey on the usual road, as he mentions Samaria and Galilee, and adds that he went through between them, and not across their borders the nearest way. Christ journeyed from Capernaum eastward to the Jordan and southward from Galilee to Jerusalem, which was a tiresome, far and circuitous route, in doing which he took his own leisure and time. For he did not journey thus for his own sake, but in order to preach as much as possible and be of service to many. Therefore he journeyed on the borders of these lands to appear publicly, that people might come to him from all sides to hear him and obtain his help. For he was sent to offer his services to every one, that all might freely enjoy his favor and grace. Thus the Evangelist now describes the miracle and says: “And as he entered into a certain village, there met him ten men that were lepers, who stood afar off; and they lifted up their voices, saying, Jesus, Master, have mercy on us.”

3. One might ask the Evangelist how these lepers could stand afar off and lift up their voices, as lepers could not as a rule speak loud, and therefore they had to make a noise by rattling or clapping something? Of course he would answer they did not stand a mile away, only that they were not as near to him as those following him; and that all lepers are not so entirely voiceless that they cannot be heard even at a distance. However, the Evangelist, according to the custom of Holy Writ, desires hereby to indicate the great earnestness of their desire, that the voice of their heart was great that compelled them to cry out bodily as loud as they could.

4. This entire Gospel, however, is a plain, simple history or transaction, which requires little explanation. Yet as plain as it is, great is the example it presents to us. In the leper it teaches us faith, in Christ it teaches us love.

Now, as I have often said, faith and love constitute the whole character of the Christian. Faith receives, love gives. Faith brings man to God, love brings man to his fellow. Through faith he permits God to do him good, through love he does good to his brother man. For whoever believes has every thing from God, and is happy and rich. Therefore he needs henceforth nothing more, but all he lives and does, he orders for the good and benefit of his neighbor, and through love he does to his neighbor as God did to him through faith. Thus he reaps good from above through faith, and gives good below through love. Against this kind of life workrighteous persons with their merits and good works terribly contend for they do works only to serve themselves, they live only unto themselves, and do good without faith. These two principles, faith and love, we will now consider as they appear in the lepers and in Christ.



5. In the first place it is a characteristic of faith to presume to trust God’s grace, and it forms a bright vision and refuge in God, doubting nothing it thinks God will have regard for his faith, and not forsake it. For where there is no such vision and confidence, there is no true faith, and there is also no true prayer nor any seeking after God. But where it exists it makes man bold and anxious freely to bring his troubles unto God, and earnestly to pray for help.

6. Therefore it is not enough for you to believe there is a God, and pray many words as the wretched custom now is. But observe here in the leper how faith is constituted, how without any teacher at all it teaches us how our prayers may be truly fruitful. You here observe how they had a good opinion of and a comforting assurance in Christ, and firmly thought he would be gracious to them. This thought made them bold and anxious to bring their troubles to him, and to cry for help with great earnestness and a loud voice. For if they had not previously possessed this fancy and expectation, they would undoubtedly have remained at home, or would not have gone forth to meet him, nor would they with raised voices have cried to him, but their doubt would have advised them thus: What shall we do?

Who knows whether he would like to have us ask him? Perhaps he will not notice us!

7. O such wavering and doubt offer sluggish prayers, it does not raise the voice nor go forward to meet Christ! It indeed murmurs many words and chants many songs very unwillingly. But it does not pray, and only desires first to be sure it will be heard, which is nothing else than to tempt God.

But true faith does not doubt the good and gracious will of God.

Wherefore its prayer is strong and firm like faith itself. St. Luke does not relate three things of them in vain; first, that they went to meet him; second, they stood; third, they lifted up their voices. By these three things their strong faith is commended and presented to us as an example.

8. The going forth to meet him is the boldness excited by comforting assurance. The standing is the firmness and sincerity against doubt. The lifting up the voice is the great earnestness in prayer, growing out of such confidence. But powerless doubt does not go forth, nor stand, nor call, but turns and twists and hangs the head, grasps it in the hands, opens the mouth wide and stammers forth perpetually: Who knows? Who knows? If it were certain? How if it would fail? and similar faint-hearted expressions.

For it has no favorable conception or thought of God, expects nothing of him, and hence will receive nothing, as James says, 1:6-7: “But let him ask in faith, nothing doubting; for he that doubteth is like the surge of the sea driven by the wind and tossed. For let not that man think that he shall receive anything of the Lord.” Afterwards they come like the foolish virgins who spilt their oil, with their empty lamps, that is with their works, and think God should hear them knock and open to them. But he will not.

9. Behold this good inclination or comforting trust, or free presumption toward God, or whatever you may call it, in the Scriptures is called Christian faith and a good conscience, which man must have if he desires to be saved. But it is not obtained by human works and precepts, as we shall see in this example, and without such a heart no work is good. Therefore be on your guard, there are many lecturers who want to teach faith and conscience, and know less about them than a common blockhead. [WELS plus the LCMS Seminaries, the ELS and ELCA!] They think it is a sleepy, lazy thing in the soul, that it is enough for the heart to believe that God is God. But here you observe what a thoroughly living and powerful thing faith is. It creates wholly a new heart, a new man, who expects all grace from God. Therefore it urges to walk, to stand, makes bold to cry and pray in every time of trouble.

10. The second characteristic of faith is that it does not desire to know, nor first to be assured whether it is worthy of grace and will be heard, like the doubters, who grasp after God and tempt him. Just as a blind man runs against a wall, so they also plunge against God, and would first gladly feel and be assured that he can not escape out of their hands. The Epistle to the Hebrews says, <581101> 11:1: “Now faith is assurance of things hoped for, a conviction of things not seen.” This clearly means faith holds fast to what it does not see, feel or experience, either in body or soul, but as it has firm trust in God it commits itself to and relies upon it without any doubt but its hope will be realized. Thus it will also certainly be realized, and the feeling and experience will come to it unsought and unsolicited, even in and through such hope or faith.

11. For tell me, who had given these lepers a letter and seal that Christ would hear them? Where is there any experience and feeling of his grace?

Where is the information, knowledge or certainty of his goodness? Nothing of the kind is here. What then is here? A free resignation and joyful venture on his imperceptible, untried and unknown goodness. Here there is no trace in which they might discover what he would do, but his mere goodness alone is kept in view, which fills them with such courage and venture to believe he would not forsake them. Whence, however, did they receive such knowledge of his goodness, for they must have known of it before, be they ever so inexperienced and insensible of it? Without doubt from the good reports and words they had heard about him, which they had never yet experienced. For God’s goodness must be proclaimed through his Word, and thus we must build upon it untried and inexperienced, as will hereafter appear.

12. The third characteristic of faith is, that it allows of no merit, will not purchase the grace of God with works, like the doubters and hypocrites do, but brings with it pure unworthiness, clings to and depends wholly on the mere unmerited favor of God, for faith will not tolerate works and merit in its company, so entirely does it surrender, venture and raise itself into the goodness for which it hopes, that for its sake it cannot consider either good works or merit. Yea, it sees that this goodness is so great, that all good works compared with it are nothing but sin. Therefore it finds only unworthiness in self, that it is more worthy of wrath than of grace; and it does this without any dissimulation, for he sees how in reality and in truth it cannot be otherwise 13. These lepers here prove this clearly, who hope for the grace of Christ without the least merit. What good had they ever done to him before? They had never seen him, how then could they have served him? Besides they were lepers, whom he could justly have avoided according to the law, Leviticus 13:1, and kept himself free from them as was just and right.

For in reality and truth there was unworthiness, and reason why he should have nothing to do with them nor they with him. For this cause they also stand far off, like those who well knew their unworthiness. Thus faith also stands far from God, and yet it goes to meet him and cries out, for it knows itself in the reality of truth to be unworthy of his goodness, and has nothing on which to depend, except his highly renowned and loudly praised goodness. And such a soul also seeks Christ’s favor, while it stands far off and is empty; for it cannot in the least tolerate in its company our merit and work, and comes freely like Christ into this village to the lepers, in order that its praise may be free and pure.

14. Observe how everything agrees perfectly that God’s love gives its favor freely, does not take nor seek anything for it, and how faith also receives quite freely and pays nothing for it, and thus the rich and the poor meet together, as the Psalms say, To this their words also testify when they say: Have mercy on us! He who seeks mercy of course neither buys nor sells anything, but seeks pure grace and mercy, as one unworthy of it, and evidently having greatly deserved the contrary.



15. Behold, here is a good, real, living and true example of Christian faith, that sufficiently teaches us how we must be disposed if we would find grace, piety and salvation. Now, in addition to this doctrine follows the incentive or inducement to faith, that we should gladly believe as we are at present taught to believe. This incentive, however, consists in that we observe how such faith never fails, that as it believes so it comes to pass, and that it is certainly heard and answered.

For Luke describes how graciously and willingly Christ beheld and heard the lepers, and says: “And when he saw them, he said unto them, Go and show yourselves unto the priests.”

16. How very friendly and lovingly the Lord invites all hearts to himself in this example, and stirs them to believe in him! For there is no doubt that he desires to do for all what he here does for these lepers, if we only freely surrender ourselves to him for all his favor and grace. Just as true faith and a Christian heart should do and delight to do; so these lepers also do and teach us to do. For how earnestly the Lord desires that we should joyfully and freely venture to build on his favor before we experience or feel it, he has here sufficiently testified that he hears them willingly, without any hesitation, that he does not first say he will do it, but as though it were already done, he did as they wished. For he does not say: Yes, I will have mercy on you, ye shall be cleansed; but merely: “Go and show yourselves unto the priests.” As though he would say: There is no use of asking, your faith has already acquired and obtained it, before you began to ask; you were already cleansed in my sight when you began to expect such things of me; it is no longer necessary, only go and show your purity to the priests; as I consider you and as you believe, so you are and shall be. For he would not have sent them to the priests, if he had not considered them clean, and so wished to deal thus with them, as those who had become cleansed.

17. Behold, so powerful is faith, to obtain all it wants of God, that God considers it done before the asking. Of this Isaiah says, 65:24: “And it shall come to pass that, before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.” Not as though faith or we were worthy of it, but in order that he might show his unspeakable goodness and willing grace, thereby to stir us to believe in him, and comfortingly look to him for every good thing, with joyful and unwavering consciences, which do not stumble after him nor tempt him. So now you also see that Christ hears these lepers before they call, and before they cry out he is prepared to do all their hearts desire. “Go,” he says, I will not add a word, for it has succeeded in your case farther, no promise or consent is necessary; take what you ask and go.

Are not these strong incentives that make the heart joyful and eager?

Behold, then his grace permits itself to be felt and grasped, yea it grasps and satisfies us. This has been said on the first part, namely, faith.

18. Now we must also examine the other part of this example of the nature of Christianity, love. The lepers have instructed us how to believe; Christ teaches us to love. Love does to our neighbor as it sees Christ has done to us, as he says in John 13:15: “For I have given you an example, that ye also should do as I have done to you.” And immediately afterwards he says in verse 34: “A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.”

What else does this mean than to say: Through me in faith you now have everything that I am and have: I am your own, you are now rich and satisfied through me; for all I do and love I do and love not for my but only for your sake, and I only think how to be useful and helpful to you, and accomplish whatever you need and should have. Therefore consider this example, to do to each other as I have done to you, and only consider how to be useful to your neighbor, and do what is useful and necessary for him.

Your faith has enough in my love and grace; so your love shall also give enough to others.

19. Behold, this is a Christian life, and in brief it does not need much doctrine nor many books, it is wholly contained in faith and love. Thus also says St. Paul, Galatians 6:2: “Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the Law of Christ.” And to the Philippians 2:4 he says: “Not looking each of you to his own things, but each of you also to the things of others.” And there he gives us Christ as an example, 5:6: “Who existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped.” Who, although he was true God, yet became our servant and served us, and died a scandalous death for us. This Christian, free and joyful life has the evil spirit as its enemy, who with nothing else does such great injury as with the doctrines of men, as we shall hear. For truly the manner of a Christian’s life is briefly marked out in the words, have a good heart toward God and a good will toward your fellow man, here it consists entirely within us.

20. His good heart and faith naturally teach him how to pray. Yea, what is such faith, but pure prayer? It continually looks for divine grace, and if it looks for it, it also desires it with all the heart. And this desire is really the true prayer, that Christ teaches and God requires, which also obtains and accomplishes all things. And because it does not trust or seek comfort in self, its works or worthiness, but builds upon God’s pure grace, therefore whatever he believes, desires, hopes and prays, also comes to pass; so that the holy Prophet Zechariah justly calls the Spirit a Spirit of grace and of prayer, where God says, Zechariah 12:10: “And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and supplication.” Because faith recognizes and desires God’s favor without any intermission.

21. Again, love naturally teaches him how to do good works. For they alone are good works which serve your neighbor and are good. Yea, what is such love but only good deeds continually shown toward your neighbor, so that our work is called love, our faith is called prayer? Thus Christ speaks in John 15:12-13: “This is my commandment, that ye love one another, even as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” As though he would say: So completely have I done all my works for your benefit, that I also gave my life for you, which is the greatest of all love, that is, the greatest work of love. If I had known a greater love, I would have manifested it to and for you. Therefore you should also love each other, and do all good deeds to one another. I require no more of you. I do not say you are to build for me churches, make pilgrimages, fast, sing, become monks or priests, or that you are to enter into this order or rank; but you do my will and service when you do good to each other, and no one cares for himself but for others, on this all entirely depends.

22. And these he calls “friends.” By this he does not mean that we should not love our enemies. For he says clearly: “Who lays down his life for his friends.” “His friends” are more than mere “friends.” It may come to pass that you are my friend, and yet I am not your friend, or I may love you and receive you as a friend and offer you my friendship, and yet you may hate me and remain my enemy. Just as Christ says to Judas in the garden: “Friend, do that for which thou art come.” Matthew 27:50. Judas was his friend, but Christ was Judas’ enemy, for Judas considered him his enemy and hated him. Christ loved Judas and esteemed him as his friend. It must be a free, perfect love and kindness toward every one.

23. See, this is what James means when he says, 2:26: “Faith apart from works is dead.” For as the body without the soul is dead, so is faith without works. Not that faith is in man and does not work, which is impossible. For faith is a living, active thing. But in order that men may not deceive themselves and think they have faith when they have not, they are to examine their works, whether they also love their neighbors and do good to them. If they do this, it is a sign that they have the true faith. If they do not do this, they only have the sound of faith, and it is with them as the one who sees himself in the glass and when he leaves it and sees himself no more, but sees other things, forgets the face in the glass, as James says in his first chapter, verses 23-24. [This passage in James deceivers and blind masters have spun out so far, that they have demolished faith and established only works, as though righteousness and salvation did not rest on faith, but on our works. To this great darkness they afterwards added still more, and taught only good works which are no benefit to your neighbor, as fasting, repeating many prayers, observing festival days; not to eat meat, butter, eggs and milk; to build churches, cloisters, chapels, altars; to institute masses, vigils, hours; to wear gray, white and black clothes; to be spiritual; and innumerable things of the same kind, from which no man has any benefit or enjoyment; all which God condemns, and that justly. But St. James means that a Christian life is nothing but faith and love. Love is only being kind and useful to all men, to friends and enemies. And where faith is right, it also certainly loves, and does to another in love as Christ did to him in faith.

Thus everyone should beware lest he has in his heart a dream and fancy instead of faith, and thus deceives himself. This he will not learn anywhere as well as in doing the works of love. As Christ also gives the same sign and says: “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” John 13:35. Therefore St. James means to say:

Beware, if your life is not in the service of others, and you live for yourself, and care nothing for your neighbor, then your faith is certainly nothing; for it does not do what Christ has done for him. Yea, he does not believe that Christ has done good to him, or he would not omit to do good to his neighbor.

This St. Paul also requires, 1 Corinthians 13:2: “If I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.” This explains the whole matter, not that faith is insufficient to make us pious, but that a Christian life must embrace and never separate these two, faith and love.

But the presumptuous undertake to separate them, they want only to believe and not to love, they despise their neighbor, and yet pretend to have Christ. This is false and must fail.

Thus we say, too, that faith is everything and it saves us, that a man needs no more for his salvation. Yet he is on this account not idle, but labors much, all however for the benefit of his neighbor, and not for himself; for he does not need it, he has enough in Christ. If, however, he does not do this, he is certainly not right. And this his work is his love. But the blind guides want to teach that works are necessary, that the worker needs them for his salvation. This is the chief perversion, the error of all errors, for by this they destroy both faith and love, the entire Christian nature and example. They take the work from the neighbor, and give it to the person himself doing it, as though he needed it. Here faith cannot live, for he knows that his work is not necessary and helpful for himself, but only for his neighbor. Thus they are opposed to each other; faith casts the works from itself on the neighbor through love; but the blind teachers tear them from the neighbor, and apply them to their own persons, and thus choke and dampen both love and faith, and cause man only to love himself and to seek only his own salvation and trust in his own works. From this evil must follow dull consciences and much self-chosen work, building churches, much praying, the saints’ fasting and the like, which are beneficial to no one, and all misery and misfortune must follow, as is at present evident in the cloisters, monasteries and high schools.] 24. Now let us observe the works of the love of Christ in this example of the ten lepers. But what is in Christ besides pure love? Everyone can easily find out for himself. First, why is it necessary for him to travel between Samaria and Galilee? Or who paid him anything for doing this? Or who requested him to do so? Is it not manifest, that he does all this freely, willingly, without receiving anything for it, and comes of himself uninvited, that no one can say that he deserved such a visitation or acquired it by prayer. Thus we see here that he does nothing whatever for himself or for his own sake, but all for the sake of others, unrequested and altogether freely, out of mere grace and love.



25. In like manner, that he had just gone into this village, why did he need to do this? Who asked him to do so? Who paid him anything for it? Is it not true that he came before any merit was possible, any prayer could be said; and offers his love and kindness freely and gratuitously, and seeks nothing of his own in it but only serves others thereby, so that he might draw all hearts unto himself to believe in him? Behold, such virtue has love, that it does only good and lives for the benefit of others, seeks nothing with selfish motives, does all freely and gratuitously, and surprises everyone. Such life and work you must observe and direct your life accordingly, if you would be a Christian, and banish all such works and power from your view that are not of this nature, even if they be so great as to remove mountains, like the Apostle says, 1 Corinthians 13:2.

26. Note in the second place how Christ does good without harm to others, yea, by preventing harm to others. For there are some who do good in a way that is harmful to others, as the proverb runs, they offer our lady a penny and steal her horse. So they who give alms from ill-gotten goods, as God says in Isaiah 61:8: “For I, Jehovah, love justice, I hate robbery for burnt offering.” Of this nature are nearly all monasteries and cloisters that devour the sweat and blood of the people, and then pay God with masses, vigils, rosaries, or monasteries and holidays, and at times they also give an alto. This is to love with the goods of others, and to serve God in prosperous days and in the fullness of wealth with an all sufficiency. This disgraceful well-doing is indeed a far reaching plague. But here Christ does no one harm, but prevents injury rather, and directs the lepers to the priests, so that they may be deprived of none of their rights.

27. Thus he bestows his kind deeds upon the lepers, as though he went into this village for this purpose; he looks upon them graciously and willingly, and gladly helps them. Besides he thereby also prevents any disadvantage to the priests, although he is under no obligation to them. For as he cleansed the lepers in a supernatural manner without the priests doing anything, he was indeed not obliged to direct them to them, and could say:

Inasmuch as you have not performed your office toward these according to the law, therefore you should also not have the emoluments of the office, which is just and right. But love does not look on what is right nor does it contend, it is present only to do good, and so it does even more than it is obliged to do, and goes beyond what is right.

Therefore St. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 6:1, that among Christians there should be no lawsuits at court, because love does not seek or demand its rights, nor cares anything for them, but is bent only on doing good.

Although he says at another place, 1 Corinthians 13:1: “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am become sounding brass, or a clanging cymbal.” Thus are truly the learned of our day, who teach much about rights, which is only unchristian and opposed to love. I do not speak of those who are forced to contend for their rights; for as right is preferred by some unchristian people, they must be present and defend the right so that nothing worse occurs. It is not Christian, to hang or to crush under the wheel; but in order to restrain murderers, such things must also be done. It is not Christian to eat and drink, nevertheless man is compelled to do both. These are all necessary works, which do not concern the inner nature of Christianity. Therefore a person should not be satisfied in doing them, as though the doing of them made a Christian. The work in the married state is not distinctively Christian, yet it is necessary to avoid evil. Other examples might be given.

28. Thirdly, Christ shows love is still greater, in that he exercises it where it is lost and receives ingratitude from the majority; ten lepers were cleansed and only one thanks him, on the nine his love is lost. If he would have made use of justice here instead of love, as men are accustomed to do and nature teaches, he would have made them all lepers again. But he lets them go and enjoy his love and kind deed, although they return to him enmity instead of thanks. Nor did he prevent the priests from enjoying their own, but gave them their honor and rights, although without any need and obligation to do so. And the priests thank Christ by alienating from him the lepers, so that they believed Christ did not cleanse them, but their offering and obedience to the law did it. And thus they destroy the faith in the lepers, and cause Christ to be despised and hated by them, as though he had taken to himself an office that did not belong to him.

29. That the priests had examined these lepers one may readily believe, and this the text also suggests. Therefore they must have trumpeted into these lepers many wicked words against Christ, and highly praised the works and offerings of the law, so that they might root out of them their great and noble faith, and establish themselves in place of Christ in their heart. And the lepers accepted this, and regarded Christ as the priests told them, so that they became his enemies, and ascribed their purification to God as obtained by virtue of their offerings and merit, and not by Christ and his pure grace. And while they were thus released from bodily leprosy, they thereby fell into spiritual leprosy, which is a thousand times worse. But Christ permits both parties to go and enjoy his goodness, is silent about his rights, receives hatred and displeasure for praise and thanks; that we may hereby learn how we often pray, and that it were better for us if our prayers were not answered. It would have been better for these lepers if they had remained unclean than that by their bodily cleansing they should become diseased with a more dangerous spiritual leprosy.

30. Now study this example and incite your life that you may do your good works not only without harm to others, but also to their advantage, and not only to friends and the good, but consider that the greater portion will be lost, and that you will receive ingratitude and hatred as your reward. Then you will walk the right road in the footprints of Christ your Lord. Until you have accomplished this, you should not regard yourself a true, perfect Christian, it matters not whether you wear ten hairy shirts and fast every day, or celebrate mass every day, and pray the psalter, make pilgrimages, and establish churches or yearly festivals. For Christ wishes to have such works done, if they are done in the right spirit. Behold, this is truly a Christian life.

But now you see whither Christ’s works tend. Therefore attend to this with all diligence, and view your own life aright. If you find a work of yours, which you need or think you need for your salvation, stamp it under your feet, guard yourself as in the presence of all the devils, and never rest until you are delivered from such a spirit or work, and strive that your life may be useful and serviceable not to your, but only to your neighbor’s need.

Cursed be he who lives and works only for himself, for Christ did not wish to do his own will nor live for himself! For your own works will certainly lead you away from love and faith. You have no other work that is necessary and useful for thy salvation than to believe, and daily to exercise yourself in this faith, and see to it that you continue steadfast in it, and not allow the priests to deprive you of it, as they did these nine lepers, for they have slick tongues and a beautiful color. Only let all other works go in one bundle, be they lost or well applied, let that not trouble you; you remain in the faith Christ gives you, here you have many times enough; and in love, which gives you to your neighbor, you will have enough to do, for which you will find yourself many times deficient. For what you do in this is nothing, even if you should possess all the works of the saints. Hear what St. Paul says, 1 Corinthians 13:3: “And if I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and if I give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profiteth me nothing.” It is not enough to help the poor and torment yourself, you must love your enemy and cast your goods with yourself into the waste heap, and not choose one rather than another to whom to do good.

Here you might say: Alas, what will now become of the spiritual orders, the priests, the monks and the nuns? Are they of service to no one, and do they perform only their own works? Answer: Why do you ask about priests and monks? Has not Christ ordered you to follow him, and not priests and monks? If their works are not done in the sense before mentioned, that one should serve the other and cling to faith, you are never to doubt that they are opposed to Christ, and are as the foolish virgins with their empty, dark lamps. For their sake another Christ will not come. Of this St. Peter prophesies, 2 Peter 2:1: “There shall be false teachers among you, they will bring forth destructive sects,” that is, spiritual orders and ranks, in which souls will only be condemned. And St. Paul, in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-11: “Because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God sendeth them a working of error, that they should believe a lie, that they all might be judged who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” In these words the spiritual orders and ranks are set forth, how they are constituted and whence they come. For they pretend to be something extraordinary and better than other callings and stations in the Christian life, while they are farther from the Christian life than any other calling or any other people on earth, and need more to bring them to the true Christian life. Some of these callings and their governments are well ordered, for there are wife and child and subject, who exercise and give occasion for love, and likewise insist that you must not live or work for yourself, but are compelled to work only for the good of others. If you only know the faith and really live according to it, you then have no work of your own and you will have so much to do that you will be obliged to forget your own work. For in that you fast, labor, eat, drink, sleep, take a wife, in short do everything for the needs of your body and estate, is all done that you may live here and support the body in order that you may serve others. Behold, this is truly a Christian life. Therefore St. Paul says, in Romans 13:8: “Owe no man anything, save to love one another,” and in love to serve each other. From this you may know why all the world is full of spiritual orders, that is, dens of hell and murder, but no one knows any longer what a Christian life is, not to mention that one should find an example of it. This is all the fault of the Pope and his cursed law, which has given us God’s wrath for our masters, as St. Peter and St. Paul have declared.] This is enough on the first part of our Gospel, let us now examine its second part. The Evangelist says:

II. APICTURE OF THE CHRISTIAN CHARACTER IN ITS DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH.

“And it came to pass, as they went, they were cleansed.”

31. Thus far we have learned how faith works, its nature, whence it comes, what its beginning is, what it brings, and how acceptable it is before God. All this is said of the beginning of a Christian life. But it is not enough to begin, we must increase and continue steadfast, for Christ says, Matthew 24:13: “But he that endureth to the end shall be saved.” And Luke 9:62: “No man, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God.” Therefore this second part treats of the increase and perfection of faith.

32. The faith or confidence of the heart in God is a very tender and sensitive thing indeed, and it may very easily be injured, so that it begins to tremble and despair, when it is scarcely yet exercised and established. And thus it has countless attacks and dangers from sin, from nature, from reason and self-conceit, from human doctrine, from the examples of the saints and from devils. In short, it is attacked without intermission from all sides, in front and in the rear, so that it trembles and despairs, or falls to trusting in good works. Hence St. Peter truly says, 1 Peter 4:18: “The righteous is scarcely saved.” And the Prophet Zechariah compares the righteous to a brand plucked from the fire, that he may not be entirely consumed; and Amos the Prophet to a sheep’s ear that the shepherd delivered from the jaws of the wolf. So malignantly temptations rage about a believing heart.

Therefore St. Paul says to the Corinthians, 1 Corinthians 10:12: “Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” And in all places he teaches how we should walk with watchfulness and fear, and always take good care of our faith, for, as he says in 2 Corinthians 4:7: “We have this treasure in earthen vessels,” which are very easily broken if God does not preserve us.

33. Therefore we should not be secure but stand in the fear of God and pray with Jeremiah, 17:17, that God might protect our faith, and not permit us to tremble or be frightened in the presence of our faith. This Gospel also sufficiently shows this danger by a terrible example, that among these ten lepers who believed, nine fell away, and in the end only one stands and continues steadfast. It is here as with a beautiful tree in full bloom, that we think cannot bear all its fruit; but later so many blossoms are destroyed by storms, the fruit becomes wormeaten and falls, that scarcely one-tenth of it ripens. So there are many who receive the Word and begin to believe; but as the Lord says, Matthew 13:10-21, the soil is stony and not deep enough, or faith stands among thorns and thistles; that is, by reason of temptations and enticements they fall and continue not steadfast. For as soon as things go wrong with them and God afflicts them, they forget his goodness and see only his anger. Hence faith vanishes, and there remains a wavering, discouraged and frightened conscience, that flees from God, not to mention that it should go to meet him, as indeed it did at first.

34. Thus we see here that the lepers began to believe, and expected help from Christ, who then further awakens their faith and tries it, does not immediately make them well, but speaks a word to them, to show themselves to the priests. If there had been no faith in them their reason and natural fancy would have spoken thus and immediately murmured:

What is this? we expected great kindness from him, and heartily believed in him, that he would help us; but now he does not touch us, as is his custom, and as he did to others, but only looks at us and passes on. Perhaps he despises us, besides he neither promises nor denies whether he will cleanse us or not, but leaves us in doubt, and says no more than that we should show ourselves to the priests. Why should we show ourselves to them, they already know we are lepers?

We see that nature would thus become angry and lukewarm against him, because he does not immediately do her bidding, and he does not with certainty tell what he will do. But here is faith, that strengthens itself and only increases through such temptation, and cares naught how unkind or uncertain the actions and words of Christ sound, but clings fast to his goodness, and does not permit itself to be frightened away. And of a truth, there was in them a strong, rich faith, that upon his word they promptly went forth; for had they doubted they certainly would not have gone, and yet they had here no clear promise.

35. And this is the method God employs with us all to strengthen and prove our faith, and he treats us so that we know not what he will do with us. This he does for the reason, that man is to commend himself to him and rely on his mere goodness, and not doubt that he will give what we desire or something better. So also these lepers thought: Very well, we will go as he commands, and although he does not tell us whether he will cleanse us or not, this shall not influence us to esteem him any the less than before.

Yea, we will only esteem him so much the more and higher, and joyfully wait, if he will not cleanse us, he will do still better for us than if we were cleansed, and we will not on that account despair of mercy and favor.

Behold, this is the true increase of faith.

36. Such trials continue as long as we live, therefore we must also continue to grow just as long. For when he tries us in one instance in which he makes us uncertain how he will treat us, he afterwards always takes another and continually enlarges our faith and confidence, if we only remain unmovably steadfast.

Behold, this is what St. Peter calls growth in Christ when he says, Peter 2:2: “As newborn babes, long for the spiritual milk which is without guile, that ye may grow thereby unto salvation.” Again in the latter part of 2 Peter, verse 18: “But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” And St. Paul in all places desires we should increase, continue and become rich in the knowledge of God and Jesus Christ. This is nothing else than in this manner to become strong in faith, when God conceals his kindness and appears as Christ does here to the lepers, so that we do not know what to expect of him. For faith must be (argumentum non apparentium) an argument not an appearance, and be certain and not doubt in the things that are concealed and are not experienced. Hebrews 11:1.

37. Therefore observe that when God appears to be farthest away he is nearest. This word of Christ reads as though we cannot know what he will do, he does not refuse nor promise anything, so that the lepers, who previously certainly relied on his kindness for all things, might have become offended at it, and begun to doubt, and taken quite a different sense of it than Christ meant. Christ speaks it out of an overflowing kindness that he thinks it unnecessary to tell them that they have already obtained what they want. But as the sense was not clear to them they might have thought he was entirely of a different opinion, and farther from them than before.

38. Thus are all his superabundant kindnesses, works and words, that we may think that he was previously more kind and gracious than afterwards, when he first had anything to do with us.

Thus it also happened to the people of Israel in the desert, they thought God did not bring them out of Egypt, upon whom nevertheless they called and they knew while in Egypt that he would help them. But all this is done that we may not remain in weakness when we first begin to believe, but grow and ever increase until we be able to take the strong nourishment and become satisfied and full of the Spirit, that we may not only despise and triumph over riches, honor and friends, but also over death and hell.

39. Hence it is with the faithless and unbelieving as with unfortunate mine workers, who begin to prospect with great confidence, and dig extensively.

But when they are about to strike the treasure, which would have taken but a little more labor, they give up, and look at what they did as in vain, and think, there is nothing in it. Then comes another worthy of the task, who had never yet made a beginning, but he strikes away boldly and finds what the former hunted and dug for him. Thus it is also with the grace of God; he who begins to believe and will not continually grow and increase, from him grace will be taken and given to another who begins with it; if he, too, will not continue it will be taken also from him and given to another. It only wants to be believed. And here our high schools speak wholly blind, mad, and poisonous things about faith, when they teach that the beginning of faith is enough for salvation, and is only a small degree or step from it.

40. So these words of the text, “And it came to pass, as they went, they were cleansed,” would say: It is impossible for faith to fail, it must take place as it believes. For if these lepers had not believed and remained steadfast, of course they would not have gone. Therefore, not for the sake of their going, but on account of their faith they became cleansed, because of which they also went.

41. All this I say in order that some blind teacher may not come to this text and stick his eyes into good works without seeing the faith: and afterwards pretend that works make us acceptable and save us, because these lepers went forth and thus became cleansed. This error must be opposed, that one may rightly see the faith of these lepers, and thus it will appear that their work of going did not obtain the cleansing, but faith did. [So also the Lord opposes the same error in that he cleanses them before they accomplish the work assigned them. For he did not only command them to go, but to show themselves to the priests. Now they evidently became cleansed before they arrived at the priests and before they had finished the work. If they had first become cleansed after they had arrived and brought the offering, the priests might have had ground for the pretense that they were cleansed by their offering and works, as they even did, and misled the poor people.] 42. Now I have often said that works are twofold; some before and without faith, others come out of and after faith. For as little as nature without faith can be idle and inactive, so much less also can faith be idle.

And as nature’s works do not precede or make nature, but nature must first be present and do the works out of and by virtue of herself; so also the works of faith do not make faith, but they follow and spring from faith. So there must be works, but they have no merit nor saving power, but all salvation and merit must first be present in faith.

43. This is also the reason that the works of faith are free and spontaneous, and not premeditated. For these lepers were also free, and if Christ had commanded them to do something else, they would have done it. And if they had been asked whether they went in order to be cleansed, they would have replied, no. This must have been so, if the cleansing took place because of their works. Just as if you should ask the hypocrites whether they work in order to be saved, they would say: Yes, and without works they would not want to be saved. [But these lepers would not speak thus, they hope he will cleanse them out of pure kindness, without considering their work of going, which they do only because he wills it to satisfy the law, although unnecessary. For all lepers might also go to the priests, and yet they would not on that account be cleansed, which nevertheless must be, if the work were necessary and useful for the cleansing. Just as the workrighteous persons think, that he who works will be saved; so it must also be here, he who goes will be cleansed. But now as the cleansing takes place only because of the presence of faith, so salvation comes also on account of faith alone.] But as the lepers must go not for their own sakes, but for the sake of the priests, that they might be satisfied, although they were not obliged to go to them; so all believers must work, not for their own sake, but for the sake of others, to serve them. Although they owe them nothing, but freely do good as Christ has done to them, about which enough has been said above in the first part.

There follows further in the text: “And one of them, when he saw that he was heated, turned back, with a loud voice glorifying God.”

44. The returning of one must have taken place after he and the others had shown themselves to the priests. But the Evangelist is silent as to how they came to the priests and what took place there. However, from the return and thankfulness of this one, he gives us to understand how it went. He without doubt very unwillingly returned alone, for as with all his heart he thanks Christ and is kind to him, the conclusion is clear how he persevered, admonished, urged, prayed and did his utmost for the others that they should go with him and acknowledge the great kindness; and no doubt it grieved him that he could not prevail upon the nine and had to leave them with tears and grief. All these and similar things force us to think of the love he had for Christ, that leaves nothing unattempted, fears no one, regards no one, if they only worthily honor and praise Christ.

45. What kind of a tempest visited the nine, that they so firmly separated from the one; as we have heard they all made a good beginning and grew in the faith of Christ? Of their own accord they would not have fallen so completely; some one must have first overthrown their faith, so that the honor which they previously gave Christ so freely and honestly, they now divert from him and rob him of this honor, and turn their friendship into enmity. Nor was it a weak falling away, that so severely offends and opposes the one leper with all his admonitions and regrets. Behold, the priests did this, they could not bear that the honor be given to Christ; hence they no doubt preached a strong sermon against him to root out their faith.

46. But what might they have said to them? Because they fought against Christ and the faith it is easy to think what they said and did, namely, what is contrary to faith; that is, they heralded into these poor lepers that they should not believe that Christ cleansed them, but should thank God, who had regard to their offering and the prayers of the priests, and heard them, and on this account cleansed them; and whatever else they said to draw away the hearts of the lepers. But the one leper did not permit himself to be drawn from Christ; he remained steadfast and overcame all the assaults of faith.

47. F3 Therefore with two strong assaults their hearts were changed. First, to cleanse one from leprosy is impossible for a creature, and it is certainly only the work of God, therefore it cannot be in any way attributed to Christ, whom they saw and regarded as a man and not as God; therefore they should beware by no means to blaspheme God, and make a god out of a mere creature. O what a fine pretense and powerful stroke this was!

What a great faith must be there to stand, when it is opposed by God himself, by his honor and work, with which one is threatened not to deny God! What heart does not think, that it would be the very best to yield to a temptation like this!

48. The next stroke was to bring forth the law of Moses, where it was commanded to hearken unto the priests at the risk of death, what they judged according to the law, Deuteronomy 17:12. As the priests here judged the cleansing was from God and not from Christ, they powerfully caught their consciences, and crushed faith to powder in the nine, for to act against the law, is also to act against God.

49. Here observe what a terrible opposition this was, when bodily and eternal death is placed in opposition to the conscience, together with the anger of God and man, the highest and greatest sins, with the greatest punishment. What heart would not fall before such terrors, or never tremble, especially when the law of God is offered as the signal of truth?

With this these nine fell, and had sooner denied ten Christs than offend God and transgress the Law, and thought they did well by doing so.

50. Then an ugly contention arose first of all concerning the one, who alone stood opposed to the priests; while all his companions fall and join his opponents. Then they also exercised diligence, prayed and threatened, that he should by no means offend God, believe the priests, nor despise the law of Moses, and beware that he be not put to death as a blasphemer.

Here the poor child must be a fool or insensible, so good he has it, or a heretic and apostate; he has become cleansed, but he must on that account risk body and life, goods and honor, friends and companions; and besides had to allow them the name that they were pious, did good and honored God, while he must be a sinner and dishonors God. And because he was a Samaritan they esteemed him perhaps the less, and thought: Let him go, he is but a Samaritan, a man lost and not of Israel; or they had mercy on him, as a man mad and possessed. See, this is the last and greatest opposition to faith. But he who continues steadfast, abides indeed forever, for here is overcome the fear of death and hell with all their terrors, in this world and in the world to come.

51. Thus the name of God must at all times do the greatest evil and be a cover for the greatest scandal through its misuse by the devil and wicked men. For as they know that man does not fear and honor anything so much as God’s name and glory, especially among good hearted people; therefore they take just such a one and bring him to their mind, that what they pretend is God; then the poor crowd follows that thinks nothing else than that a man must fear and accept all this, by which God’s name or Word is presented. Therefore an extensive knowledge is necessary in such opposition, that a man may not err, although he be threatened by the name of God. For idols have even assumed the name and honor of God. Thus the Pope always employs the name of God for every sin and shame, and all his disciples and false teachers follow him, and especially the priests who pretend that their unchristian, unbelieving orders and works are divine and Christian.

52. But it is still harder when the evil spirit torments the conscience in the throes of death, and pretends God is angry and does not care for you; of this David says, Psalm 3:2: “Many there are that say of my soul, There is no help for him in God.” Or as the Jews spoke to Christ while on the cross, Matthew 27:43: “He trusted on God; let him deliver him now, if he desireth him: for he said, I am the Son of God.” As though they would say: It is impossible for God to help him, he is wholly lost.

53. Or when God himself thus tries and forsakes a man, so that he feels nothing else in his conscience than that God has forsaken him, and will never welcome him, as David says, Psalm 31:23: “I said in my haste, I am cut off from before thine eyes.” This also tempted Abraham, Genesis 15:12; and Jacob, Genesis 32:24.

Here faith suffers its greatest distress, and is in the pangs of hell. Here it is necessary to hold fast and not suffer yourself to err, when God himself is pictured before you. Behold, this is the last and greatest trial of faith; he who remains firm here abides firm forever, for here is overcome the fear of death and hell with all the terrors in this world and the world to come.

They are the strongest Christians and the greatest spirits, who resist this temptation.

54. All this I say that we may learn to hold fast to faith, in which we have begun, and ever remain in the same firm conviction that looks to God for every good thing, and not permit ourselves to be forced or driven from it by man, the devil, sin, the law, the name of God or God himself, which we will be able to do if we only abide in the true nature of faith, as St. Paul says, Hebrews 11:1: “Faith is assurance of things hoped for, a conviction of things not seen;” but not the substance of things fleeing away, nor the evidence of things seen; that is, the nature of faith is, that it relies on the goodness of God and thinks of nothing else than to hope for and desire it. The contrary of this is to flee from it, which is terrible, and that is not an example of faith, but of assault and temptation; for God has not built our faith or good conscience, or confidence on wrath, but on grace, therefore all his promises are lovely and gracious; on the contrary his threats are terrible and bitter, which we must also believe; but on his threats Christian faith cannot build, it must have before it only that which is good.

55. Secondly, man should possess assurance. The good for which faith looks and on which it depends, must not be seen or experienced. Therefore everything a person feels, whether of pleasure or pain, he must know it is not that which he is to believe, but it is the opposition and temptation, over which he must leap and jump, close his eyes and all his senses, and cling only to the good which he neither sees nor hears, until the contention ceases. Just as Elijah wrapped his face in a mantle, when the great earthquake, wind and fire passed by.

56. The blows and assaults against this leper were much greater, besides he was left alone; but he stood firm. So far is his faith greater and more perfect, and was quite ripe. Without doubt it is an example for us, that we, too, may not permit ourselves to be influenced by like priests and saints, even though the great crowd of all the world go with them. It was indeed a great sight, that the priests withstood him, whose duty it was to teach other people the right way, and who should by rights have been the most learned.

57. And here we learn a good answer for the Pope, the priests and the wise, when they appear with their power, government, office and dignity, and pretend that we must believe them, and only hear what they say; who know well enough what it is, when Christ directs the lepers to the priests, but appear as though they could not see how this lonely man, who was not a priest but a common layman, nor was he even an Israelite, but a Samaritan, and yet he pronounces judgment on the priests’ doctrine and opinion, and is more learned than they all put together; nor does he worry about being alone, and the crowd being on their side. Now, if this had been sufficient, as our Papists say, that they are the priests, the learned, the rulers and the power, and besides they have the multitude with them, and that a man should not oppose what the government, dignity, power and multitude offer, then this Samaritan did what was not right. But God preserve us! For this Gospel here teaches that scarcely no one is so accustomed to err and go astray as just these very priests, the clergy, the most learned, the rulers, the most dignified and the greatest crowd, wherefore we are scarcely to avoid any one more than just these very ones.

58. But since Christ directs the lepers to the priests, he gives them to understand it is not their office, but the misuse of their office that is to be avoided, and draws the line how far we are to believe and follow them, namely, when they teach according to the law we are to hear them, as Moses, Deuteronomy 17:11,12, clearly declares, that the priests shall judge according to the law, and then, whoever will not hear is to be stoned; but when they without law offer their own doctrine, we shall regard neither their office nor power, and abide alone with the Scriptures. Of course the people say, that no one writes false things except the scribe; so no one preaches false doctrine except the preachers; and again as the common saying runs: The learned are the perverted! If then the priests who are placed in their offices by divine order to teach God’s Law, often and most grievously err; what shall our popes, cardinals and bishops do, who are not placed in their offices by God nor man, but by themselves, who neither preach nor study, and produce nothing but human doctrine and their own dreams? Therefore neither their office nor doctrine is any good here, they are nothing but error from head to foot, that is only to be avoided, for little of their doctrine and character is subject to controversy; for they are not the priests referred to here, as we shall hear.

59. But why does St. Luke say that this single person saw that he was cleansed; did not the others see it too, as all ten were surely cleansed! So the nine, as we have heard, with the priests, also praised God, and held him in high esteem, so that they would not give the honor to Christ as to a creature; why then does he say that this one only greatly praised God with a loud voice?

60. In the first place this is said by Luke according to a general custom, as when one says of the unthankful: he does not see the kindness clone him; that is, he will not see it nor take it to heart, nor think that he ought to be thankful, but acts as though he knew nothing about it, he despises it and regards it not. Thus these nine did not want to see and consider the kindness of Christ, and despised him as though he did nothing for them. On the contrary he who is thankful will and cannot forget, and does not cease to recognize and acknowledge his benefactor and kindness. With such eyes did this Samaritan see his cleansing.

61. On the other hand, the nine also praised God, but with their tongues, and at the same time blasphemed him in Christ. It would not have been punishable, if even at that time they had not regarded Christ as God; for he was not yet glorified, as St. John says, John 7:39. And this one also, perhaps, still held him as a mere man. But they wanted Christ to be looked upon as a sinful man and a blasphemer, and to be regarded with the utmost contempt. Such was the poison they brewed into the nine. Christ at that time sought nothing more than that they should receive him as sent to them from God, and that they should believe that God dwelt, spoke and worked in him. This they did not wish, and would not allow others to receive him thus; but he was to be looked upon as coming from the devil, and speaking and working through the devils. And such faith the nine permitted to be driven into them.

But this one remained firm in spite of them, that God must be with Christ, who spoke, worked and dwelt through and in him. Therefore his praise and thanks are mentioned and the praise of the others ignored. Through what strife and opposition he remained in his faith, we have heard above. It was a great faith that held so firmly to him who was despised, condemned and blasphemed by the priests, the learned, the rulers, the best, the greatest and the largest number among all the people. Who dare thus hold Christ at present, when the Pope, the bishops, doctors, monks, priests, princes, with all their host, have condemned him, and issued a bull against him, as we see they publicly do?

62. And here this Gospel teaches what works tried and experienced faith produces, and what is the true worship and honor man may give to God.

Some build churches for him, some arrange masses, some ring bells for him, some light candles for him that he may see; and act no differently than as though he were a child, who is in need of our gifts and services.

Although the building of churches and holding of masses at first arose from the Christians coming together to conduct the true worship; afterwards the same worship disappeared and was entirely omitted. Since then we have continued to cling to charitable foundations, buildings, singing, ringing, lighting, clothing, smoking, and as many more such preparations as there are for worship, that we have come to consider such preparations as the chief divine worship, and know nothing of any other. And we do wisely, as he who builds a house and spends all his money on the scaffolding, and during his whole life should get no further, not even to lay a single stone for the foundation. Pray tell, where will he dwell at last, when the scaffolding is torn down?

63. But the true worship is to return and praise God with a loud voice.

This is our greatest work in heaven and on earth, besides it is the only worship we may bring to God; for he needs none of the other kind, and is not capable for it: he will be only loved and praised by us. Concerning this Psalm 50:12-14 speaks: “For the world is mine and the fullness thereof.

Offer unto God the sacrifices of thanksgiving, and pay thy vows unto the Most High.” Do you think God would drink the blood of goats, or eat the flesh of bulls? Thus he might also say now to the founders of charitable institutions, smokers, singers, ringers and candle lighters: Do you think that I am blind and deaf, or that I have no house for shelter? You shall love and praise me, this is the incense you are to burn to me and the bells you are to ring for me.

64. The returning means, to bring home again to God the grace and goods received, not to keep them, not to boast of them or exalt self above others, or praise self on their account, not to reap honor thereby nor wish to be better than others, not to be satisfied with self, not to have joy in them, but to have all such joy, pleasure, honor and praise, only in him who has given them, and stand there willing and quite composed, when he shall again take them from you, and none the less just then to love and praise him. O how few there are who thus return, of course scarcely one among ten. If one has more beautiful hair than another, he delights in himself because of it above others; what then will he do with the great gifts of reason, spirit, etc.? These are the ravens of Noah that flew out of the ark, and did not return, Genesis 8: 7. To sum up all: To return embraces these two thoughts: not to cling to God’s gifts, but only to himself, who gives them.

65. Thus the great praise of God includes two parts: The first is to esteem him highly in the heart, and to have a lovely disposition toward him, so that we taste and experience how sweet the Lord is, of which St. Peter speaks, 1 Peter 2:3, and Psalm 34:8: “O taste and see that Jehovah is good.”

All this faith, that has been tried, teaches and brings us at the end of the conflict. For as long as the strife and conflict endure, faith is in labor, and all is painful and bitter, it experiences and tastes no sweetness in God. But as soon as the evil hour is past, if we persevere and remain firm, then the sweetness of God will be ours. God will become so lovely, satisfactory and sweet to the heart, that it will desire nothing more than to battle and to seek to try his faith, and now as it were thirsts and longs for suffering and misfortune, which all the world fears, and which he also himself previously feared, of which Psalm 26:2 speaks: “Examine me, O Jehovah, and prove me; try my heart and my mind.” Out of this valiant faith comes quite a different man with a different taste, so that henceforth he does not feel well without suffering, and as it were lives contrary to all the world, so that he rejoices where the world mourns, and mourns where the world rejoices, until he becomes an enemy of this whole life and becomes eager for death.

66. This is what St. Paul means when he says, Galatians 6:14: “Through which the world hath been crucified unto me, and I unto the world.” That is, my joy and life are the suffering and death of the world, and her joy and life are my suffering and death. Therefore he says again, Philippians 1:23: “Having the desire to depart and be with Christ.” To this taste and knowledge no hypocrite can come, for conflict and suffering they do not want, and so they must remain faithless and wholly unexperienced in spiritual things.

67. The other part is to break forth with the voice, and to confess before the world what the heart within believes of God. This is nothing else than to bring down upon one’s self the enmity of the world, and to send many messengers after death and the cross. For he who would praise and honor God with his voice, must condemn all the praise and honor of the world and say that all the works and words of man are nothing, with all the honor they have from them, and that God’s work and Word alone are worthy of praise and honor. But you see that the world cannot tolerate this, and so you must bear the brunt and be a heretic, a deceiver, a blasphemer, while you promise many good works and a spiritual life in all your divine services. Then they will command your silence, or make it hot for you. And it is not possible for them to suffer it from you, for their pet affairs they will not allow you to reject. So is it also impossible for you to cease and be still, but with loud voice like this leper you rather confess God’s praise and honor alone in his works and words; and thus you then go to pieces and become ashes. Then the Pope goes to work and enlarges his almanac with red ink, and makes them saints in heaven, and blots you out of the book of life, and casts you four thousand miles on the other side of hell, and you are now a rotten member cut off from holy Christendom, that you may not infect the holy church with the poison of your foul odor and your satanic doctrines.

68. Christ speaks of this in Matthew 24:9: “Ye shall be hated of all the nations for my name’s sake.” Why for my name’s sake? They would and might not tolerate the name, praise and honor of God, for then they and their whole cause would be put to shame. And if God alone were wise, good, just, faithful and strong, then they would be fools, wicked, unjust, liars, false and impotent. Who would bear this great injustice, the devilish heresy, that so much divine service and godly life should for God’s sake be abolished and changed as a foolish, unjust, false and impotent thing? Not so, it must not be God, but the devil who pretends this. Behold, upon the highways all the prophets are murdered and Christ himself. The world does not want to be a fool nor to be unjust. But God will not suffer this from it, and hence he sends his messengers to punish it. And thus the saints must then shed their blood on account of it. Therefore it is a great act to praise God and to raise a free and loud voice before the world.

69. However, the false saints and murderers of Christ also now praise and extol with a loud voice God and his works, yea, they preach and cry more about God than the true saints do. As we even now see every corner full of preachers, who highly extol and praise God, that he alone is worthy of praise and honor, and use the very same voice and Word which the true preachers use. Why then is it not valid? Or what is the matter with it?

Without doubt nothing else than that they with this leper do not fall down at the feet of Christ to thank him, but want Christ to fall down at their feet and thank them. For the Jews give all honor to God, but of Christ they will know nothing. So it is with these; as long as we leave their cause alone and do not reject it they cry and praise us very highly. But if one also judges them by their doctrine, and their own cry falls upon them, that they are nothing and their whole cause nothing but falsehood and foolishness; then their praise and cry are gone, and their false heart breaks forth and is revealed, so that they praise and honor God only with the mouth and themselves with the heart.

70. It is not enough that you loudly call and cry that God does all things and our work is nothing; you must also suffer such things to be said of you and your affairs. You can agree that Christ’s and your enemy is nothing, and all he does is rejected, and you think it is right and well done; for his cause is not from God, but against God. But you do not wish to be rejected with him. Your cause is to be God himself and unrejected; how then is it possible that you should tolerate the rejected Christ, not to mention falling at his feet and regarding yourself as unworthy, when with him you would be rejected? Now as God has concealed himself in the despised man Christ, and will dwell there, you must not undertake to find him anywhere else, except in contempt; yea, you must reach the point to rejoice that you are found worthy to be despised, and must also fall at his feet and thank him for the contempt, which will not suffer your cause to be anything, so that it be not words but deeds; that you say: God alone is to be praised and not man, such instruction is first to be proved by you, you suffer such things just for the sake of his doctrine, and you consider yourself unworthy of all this.

71. Thus Christ also taught the same and praised God’s name alone; and also suffered first and most of all, that he became as nothing, so that no one can be compared to him in this. O this is a rich, great example, of which much might be said. But now it is sufficient that we may see a little how great a cause it is to prove God’s praise by our actions, and fall upon our faces at the feet of Christ, the man despised; as the Apostles were glad, Acts 5:4, that they were worthy to suffer dishonor for the Name, of which it is said, Psalm 72:9, that the enemies of Christ are to bow before him, and lick the dust from his footprints. That is as St. Paul also says, they shall boast in his sufferings and cross, that shall come upon them on account of the praise of God and the punishment of men. For as Christ himself thus suffered, suffering has become so precious that no one is worthy of it, and it is to be regarded and esteemed as great grace.

72. From this we see how far a Christian life is above the natural life. First, it despises self; secondly, it loves and thirsts for contempt; thirdly, it punishes everything that is unwilling to be despised, by which it resigns itself to all misfortune; fourthly it is also despised and persecuted .on account of such contempt and punishment; fifthly, it does not think itself worthy to suffer such persecution. Now from the very first part the world and nature flee, when then will they come to the last? But there is still another and a greater behind it, concerning the falling at the feet of Christ, which the priests neither understand nor want; for not every faith is sufficient for it, but the faith of Christ must be there, that truly humiliates us. Of this we will treat later under the spiritual interpretation. “And he was a Samaritan.”

73. Why was it necessary for the Evangelist to write, rather than something else, that this one leper was a Samaritan? By this he opens our eyes and warns us that God has two kinds of people who serve him. One, that has the appearance and name of having a great, spiritual, holy life, is employed almost wholly in it, and yet it is all in vain. They are nothing more than ravenous wolves in sheep’s clothing. Yet they have the honor of it, and are regarded by every one as the true worshipers of God; therefore goods, honor, friendship flow to them, and everything the world has, for God’s sake; for they think he is there, and he who thinks differently is worse than a heathen, heretic and an apostate.

74. The others are without any show and name, yea, they are of the opposite appearance, as though no one were less God’s people than they, and in short, they are thorough Samaritans; a word that sounds as badly among the Jews, as if at present you should revile one as a Turk, Jew, heathen or heretic. For the Jews alone had the name of being God’s people, and they alone had God and his worship for themselves in preference to all other people on the earth. And they hated the Samaritans above all nations, for they too claimed to be God’s people along with the Jews; therefore a Samaritan was to them as an apostate Christian is among us. And although it be true that the Samaritans did not rightly believe, and that the Jews had the true law of God, it was according to human custom that they boasted alone of Judaism and despised the Samaritans, who were less Jews and worse Samaritans, than the natural Samaritans. But now, as God loves the truth and is an enemy of hypocrisy with all its boasting, he turns it round and accepts the Samaritans and lets the Jews go. Thus it occurs that they are not his people who still have the name, the appearance and honor of his people. Again, those who are his people and have the name and appearance, are heretics, apostates and the devil’s children.

75. So it is even at the present time. The clergy, priests and monks call themselves and are regarded as the servants of God, and no one is a Christian who does not believe as they believe, whereas no one is less a Christian and God’s people than just those who thus turn up and boast themselves among them. Again, those whom they hold are heretics, many of whom they have also burned and exiled, like John Huss and his followers they dare not be Christians, although they alone are the true Christians. Here then this Gospel is so powerful that no one returns, no one exalts God with a loud voice, no one falls on his face at the feet of Christ, except the Samaritans, the despised, the condemned, the accursed, who must be heretics, apostates, errorists and satan’s own children. Therefore let us guard against everything that makes only a show, it certainly is deceiving; and let us not reject what does not make a display, so that we do not go and reject Christ and God, as the Jews did. This Christ also desires when he says: “And Jesus answering said, Were not the ten cleansed? but where are the nine? Were there none found that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger?”

76. The stranger does it, he sincerely gives God all the glory. O, what a terrible example is this! Among ten only one, and he among the least and most worthless. How entirely does God indeed overlook that which is great, wise, spiritual and honorable! And yet such people have no fear, but become hardened and petrified in their nature. It is also terrible that the Lord knows ten of them were cleansed, of this they did not think. To it he is not silent, he inquires after and seeks them: Where are the nine? O, what a frightful thing it will be when they at some future time will feel this inquiry and must answer whither they went, that they did not give God the glory. Then they will say: Well, we have nevertheless praised and thanked God, and thus our priests have taught us! Then it will appear whether it will help us to follow the doctrines of men in the name of God, and to forsake the doctrine and will of God. We are sufficiently warned in the Gospel, therefore no excuse will help us if we allow ourselves to be deceived. In Baptism we have all vowed to follow Christ and his doctrine; no one has vowed to follow the Pope, the bishops and clergy. Thus Christ has thoroughly rejected and forbidden the doctrines of men.

77. However, Christ here comforts his poor Samaritans, who for his name’s sake must risk their lives with the priests and Jews, and strengthens their hope with the sentence and judgment that he demands the nine and judges them as God’s thieves, who steal God’s glory, and justifies the Samaritan. For this hope gives them strong courage, that their cause before God will be rightly maintained and will stand, but the opposite cause will be condemned and will not stand, it matters not how great they were and what right they had on earth.

78. Therefore observe, before Christ justifies the Samaritan, he judges the nine, that we should be certain not to hasten or desire revenge, but leave it only to him, and go our way. For he is in himself so careful to defend the right and punish the wrong, that he first takes up the latter before he rewards his Samaritans.

79. Besides, he uses many more words in this sentence than to the Samaritan; so that we see how greatly he is concerned about it, and he by no means forgets their wrongs and our rights. Nor does he wait long to have them accused before him, but of his own free will summons them, so that without doubt the cause of the unbelievers influences him more and sooner than it strikes or harms us. Of this God speaks in Moses, Deuteronomy 32:35: “Vengeance is mine, and recompense.” And St.

Paul says to the Romans, 12:19: “Avenge not yourselves, beloved, but give place unto wrath.” Now the words which the Lord says to the Samaritan, when he adjusts his affairs, are the following: “And he said unto him, Arise, and go thy way; thy faith hath made thee whole.”

80. Behold, is not this a wonderful expression, that he attributes his cleansing to faith? This is opposed to the judgment of the priests who told the nine that their offering and obedience to the law had cleansed them.

But Christ’s judgment stands and triumphs, that they were not cleansed because they went to the priests, nor because of their offering, but alone on account of their faith. Therefore, as said above, faith will not tolerate any work, that it should help man to be justified and saved. For this faith more than all other things must and will do it alone, and he employs his works elsewhere, namely, to help his neighbor, as Christ has helped him.

81. And in conclusion we observe that this Gospel sufficiently teaches and represents the entire Christian life with all its events and sufferings; for the two chief things are faith and love. Faith receives the good; love gives the good. Faith offers us God as our own; love gives us to our neighbor as his own. Now when such life begins, God goes to work and improves it by trials and conflicts, through which a man increases more and more in faith and love, that through his own experience God becomes to him so heartily dear and precious, and he no longer fears anything.

Then hope grows which is certain that God will not forsake her, of which St. Paul speaks, Romans 5:3-5: “We also rejoice in our tribulations: knowing that tribulation worketh steadfastness; and steadfastness, approvedness; and approvedness, hope; and hope putteth not to shame.”

And Paul always treats of these three principles in his Epistles. To the Colossians he speaks thus, Colossians 1:3-5: “We give thanks to God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, praying always for you, having heard of your faith in Christ Jesus, and of the love which ye have toward all the saints, because of the hope which is laid up for you in the heavens.” And still more beautiful he says to the Thessalonians, Thessalonians 1:2, 3: “We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers; remembering without ceasing your work of faith and labor of love and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, before our God and Father.”

82. How beautifully he divides the three principles, that faith goes forth in trusting, love in laboring, and hope in patience and suffering. As though he would say: Your faith is not a dream nor a fancy, but it is life and action; and your love is not passive nor is it idle, but it serves well for your neighbor. All this takes place in prosperous days. while your hope is exercised in suffering and patience, and all this in Christ; for there is no faith, nor love, nor hope outside of Christ, as I said above. Thus a Christian life goes through good and evil until the end, and yet it does not seek revenge, and only grows more and more in faith, love and hope.

83. And love, which naturally follows faith, is divided into two parts: it loves God, who does so much for her through Christ in faith; it loves its neighbor, and does to him, as God does to her. Therefore, all the works of such a man go to his neighbor for God’s sake who loved him, and he does no work relating to God except to love and to praise, and he confesses this freely before the world. For God does not need other works. Thus, all worship is with the mouth; although that is also called a service of God which is done to our neighbor. But I speak now only of the service rendered to God, in which the one part man can take is to love and to praise; but in this he must resign himself wholly and entirely in all adversity.

Behold, what more would you know as to how to be a Christian? Have faith and love, continue in these, then you have and can do all things; the rest will all be taught and given to you without any exertion on your part:

This Gospel of the Ten Lepers is further expounded in a special book or postil, which examine for additional information. There you will also find the allegorical interpretation or the spiritual meaning of it.


Rev. Carl Mischke, former president of WELS, has died - JSOnline

$
0
0
Carl Mischke and WELS leaders attended the
leadership conference with ELCA's gay advocates (Herb Chilstrom)
and LCMS Church Growth fanatics (Ralph Bohlmann)
Snowbird - or rather Snow Job.
Insurance funded, of course.


Rev. Carl Mischke, former president of WELS, has died - JSOnline:

Rev. Carl Mischke, who served as president of WELS - the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, from 1979 until his retirement in 1993, died on Friday, Aug. 23.
He was 90.
Mischke served congregations in La Crosse,  and in Goodhue and Minneola Township, Minn., before his 25 years of service at St. John, Juneau, Wis., WELS said in announcing his death. While serving at St. John, he also served as the president of the Western Wisconsin District.
Funeral services will be held at 2 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 27, at St. John in Juneau. Visitation will be held from 10 a.m. until time of services.

'via Blog this'

---


Date of Birth:

Friday, October 27th, 1922

Date of Death:

Friday, August 23rd, 2013

Funeral Home:

Murray Funeral Home
131 E Maple Ave.
Beaver DamWisconsinUNITED STATES
53916

Obituary:

Sun Prairie - Rev. Carl H. Mischke, 90, of Sun Prairie, died on Friday, August 23, 2013. Rev. Mischke was born on October 27, 1922, in Hazel, South Dakota, the son of Emil Sr. and Pauline (Polzin) Mischke. On July 6, 1947, he was united in marriage with Gladys Lindloff, at Elkton, South Dakota. Carl graduated from Dr. Martin Luther High School, New Ulm, Minnesota, in 1940, and from Northwestern College, Watertown, Wisconsin, in 1944. Upon graduation from Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary, Mequon, Wisconsin, in 1947, he served his first pastorate at First Lutheran Church, La Crosse, Wisconsin. From 1949-1954, he served at St. Peter, Goodhue and St. John, Minneola Township, Minnesota. From 1954-1979 he served at St. John, Juneau, Wisconsin. During his ministry, Rev. Mischke served in leadership positions at the circuit, district and synodical levels. In 1979 he was elected President of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, serving in Milwaukee until his retirement in 1993. From then until his death he lived in Sun Prairie with his wife Gladys, who preceded him in death in 2005. He was also preceded in death by his parents, four brothers and four sisters. Survivors include four children, Joel (Janet) Mischke of Brookfield, Susan (Mark) Blahnik of Sun Prairie, the Rev. Philip (Nancy) Mischke of Minnetonka, Minnesota, and the Rev. Steven (Lynn) Mischke of Granger, Indiana; 10 grandchildren; 7 great-grandchildren; nieces; nephews; other relatives and friends. Friends may call on Tuesday, August 27, 2013 from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m. at St. John Lutheran Church, 400 S Main St in Juneau. The funeral service will follow at the church at 2 p.m. with Pastor Luke Werre officiating. Burial will be in St. John’s Cemetery, Town of Oak Grove. The Murray Funeral Home in Beaver Dam is serving the family. www.MurrayFH.com.

Hitler Loses It - Over Confessional Lutheran Memes

Classic Ichabod: Liberal President of Bowdoin College Coined the Two Justifications Loved by Rolf Preus and all UOJ Stormtroopers

$
0
0



Classic Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed: Liberal President of Bowdoin College Coined the Two Justifications Loved by Rolf Preus and all UOJ Stormtroopers:



UOJ Stormtroopers read Justification and Rome by Robert Preus but miss the clear, plain passages about justification by faith - rejecting UOJ.


Leonard Wood coined the double justification wording loved by the Synodical Conference, in print in Englishbefore C. F. W. Walther landed in America.


Leonard Wood, who translated Knapp's Lectures, was president of
Bowdoin College. Today that college is in the news:
http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/872/Honors-from-A-jad.aspx


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Woods_(college_president)

...he made a translation of George Christian Knapp's Christian Theology, which became long used as a textbook in American theological seminaries. When he became president of Bowdoin in 1839, he was only 32 years old. He held his position until 1866. During his tenure, the College built Appleton Hall, the Chapel, and Adams Hall, which housed the Medical School of Maine and the undergraduate laboratories. A recipient of advanced degrees from Colby College, Harvard University, and Bowdoin, Woods died in 1878 in Boston, Massachusetts.

'via Blog this'

Spoiling the Egyptians - But They Are Not Even WELS. Should Yale Expect Its Faculty To Be More Responsible than Wisconsin's Pastors?

$
0
0

Manassa wore this for some social event,
likely at Yale.



Scandal brings new punishments
for Egyptology program

  • Egyptologists John Darnell and Colleen Manassa ’01, ’05PhD
Yale's troubled Egyptology program is experiencing new fallout from a faculty sex scandal that rocked its department early this year, the Yale Daily News reports.
Professor John Darnell, the Egyptologist at the center of the scandal—who announced in January that he would resign as chair of the department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizationsand serve a one-year, unpaid suspension from the faculty—will extend his absence until next fall, the YDN reports.
Citing an August 3 e-mail from department chair Eckart Frahm to senior NELC faculty, the News says Provost Benjamin Polak has imposed several new restrictions on the Egyptology program and the department as a whole.
The sanctions arise from a long-running affair between Darnell and one of his students, who later joined the NELC faculty as a junior professor of Egyptology. In an e-mail to colleagues in January, Darnell acknowledged violating the faculty handbook by having a relationship with a student under his supervision. He also admitted that he had improperly participated in the review of a faculty member with whom he had an intimate relationship, and that he used his position as department chair to cover that up.
The student-turned-professor has been widely identified as Colleen Manassa ’01, ’05PhD, who worked closely with Darnell as a doctoral student and then on the faculty. The department hired her in 2006 and promoted her to associate professor in 2010.
Further complicating matters, Darnell and Manassa are Yale's only two faculty members in Egyptology, a small program in the small NELC department. Their personal relationship and their abusive treatment of graduate students—who had nowhere else to turn—created a hostile environment, according to students who complained to the university administration.
An item in the university's most recent semiannual report on complaints of sexual misconduct, released this month, refers to that complaint, according to one of the students involved. The report notes that a Yale Title IX coordinator—assigned to shepherd sexual misconduct complaints in compliance with federal anti-discrimination law—brought a formal complaint against the faculty members, charging them with "threatening, intimidating, or coercing a person or persons."
The university "did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations of sexual misconduct but did identify other problematic conduct," the report says, adding: "Disciplinary steps were taken and structures were put in place to address the academic environment."
Those steps include prohibiting Darnell from holding an administrative position until 2023, and Manassa until 2018; assigning classics professor Joe Manning to supervise the Egyptology program; barring the Egyptology program from admitting new graduate students until fall 2016; and reducing the overall number of graduate students NELC may admit, by one per year, the Yale Daily News says, citing Frahm's e-mail.
That last measure galls NELC's senior faculty. "I think it is quite unfair of the graduate school to reduce our admissions pool," Assyriologist Benjamin Foster says in an e-mail to the Yale Alumni Magazine. "The decision . . . is tantamount to group
punishment."
In an Alumni Magazine interview in January, Foster acknowledged having known that Darnell participated in "more than one" employment decision involving his lover. "The basic situation has been known for a very long time” within NELC, he said then, because “Yale’s a village.”
Another senior professor in the department, Dmitri Gutas, told the Yale Daily that he's frustrated by the administration's failure to address “breaches of academic integrity”:
A liaison between a professor and student, he said, raises the question of who produced that student’s work, and Yale’s failure to address the issue of academic integrity makes it seem tolerant of such behavior.
Gutas also criticized the secrecy of the disciplinary process, calling it "even worse than NSA."
Frahm declines to comment.


---

Profile – Man, Myth, or Legend?


This past summer, Hollywood descended on New Haven. For a week, Harrison Ford alternately lectured on archaeology in WLH and zipped on his motorcycle through SML as he and Steven Spielberg filmed the new Indiana Jones movie. For many, seeing the filming in action made it clear that Indiana Jones is a product of pure fiction. The idea of a professor calmly teaching classes between wild adventures seemed ridiculous to anyone watching — especially when the backdrop was a menagerie of grips, extras, phony props, and fake fronts.
But it may not be as absurd as it appears.
Professor John Darnell, the chair of Yale’s Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations department, has almost as much legend surrounding him as Indiana Jones, and infinitely more credibility. For years, he has brought Egypt to students and, in many cases, students to Egypt. His charisma and quirky teaching style have made him such a Yale character that he has inspired the Facebook group “John C. Darnell: Man, Myth, or Legend?” Given his experiences in Northern Africa, he just might deserve it.
When I first opened the door to Darnell’s office, I was greeted by strains of choral music and the strong scent of sherry. He beckoned me in and shook my hand as a handful of NELC professors left the room. “We were having a faculty meeting,” he said, gesturing towards the wine glasses scattered around the room. With his three-piece-suit, pocket watch, monocle, and supremely erudite sense of academic zeal, Darnell appeared to be exactly what one would expect of a stuffy Ivy League academic chair. Although he looks as though he were plucked from Victorian London, Darnell actually hails from Prattville, Alabama, and is anything but stodgy.
Darnell has been a professor of Egyptology at Yale for nine years. His passion for archaeology came from his mother, who grew up near the Mississippian Indian burial mounds and had always been fascinated with the subject. Darnell’s first brush with Egypt came when he saw a mummy in a local museum as a child. He studied Egyptology at Johns Hopkins and the University of Cologne, followed by a stint at the University of Chicago and the Oriental Institute, where he began his desert work in Luxor, Egypt, and finally Yale. But the Near East doesn’t just inspire his academics: His dog is named after King Antef II.
When Darnell is not moonlighting as a professor, he spends his time wandering the Egyptian desert with his students and colleagues, hunting for archeological clues and combating heat, scorpions, and antiquities thieves along the way. “Let me think of some good stories for you,” he said, then paused for a few moments. “Actually… I’m going to ask Colleen. She’ll be able to think of some.” He banged on the wall of his office to summon Assistant Professor Colleen Manassa, the department’s Director of Undergraduate Studies, into the room. “Some people say I take the ‘assistant’ part of ‘assistant professor’ a little literally,” he said with a smile. Manassa, a sharp young woman with Cleopatra bangs, soon arrived. For the next hour, she provided prompts and offered helpful translations of Darnell’s occasionally labyrinthine digressions.
At first I had been suspicious of Darnell’s reputation. I wondered if he might, in fact, be less Indiana Jones and more a bookish academic who spent his time brushing dust from old rocks and pottery shards in the Egyptian equivalent of rural Texas. He does do this, and in fact, most of his time in Egypt seems consumed with the fairly mundane tasks of surveying, digging, and recording finds. But there’s a touch of Harrison Ford, too.
Most of Darnell’s memories of Egypt involve road disasters and his chief assistant, Abdu. Because research takes place as many as twelve hours’ hard driving from civilization, breakdowns are common. Abdu has been working on the expeditions for nearly as long as Darnell, and, apparently, when Abdu is not accidentally discovering relics in his neighborhood (“He must live next door to the Flintstones,” said Darnell) or perilously stacking bags atop the already top-heavy Range Rovers, he is fixing cars. Once, he and Darnell even managed to repair a dying engine using rocks as their main tools.
Aside from mechanical failures, they also contend with a variety of natural hazards. Temperatures in the summer can climb as high as 130 degrees, but that’s hardly the worst threat. Once, when they were digging up a site, the first shovelful came up with a baby horned viper. Another time, a policeman they were traveling with was stung in the ear by a scorpion. Out in the desert, even something as gentle as gerbils can make for a difficult time: The rascally rodents like to invade tents and clean out the food supply. At least, Darnell claims, “the shrieking jackals won’t bother you too much.”
But these stories of baby snakes and broken cars were only the warm-up to the real adventures. Though Darnell is no tomb raider, it turns out that he still has to race against thieves to make it to sites before they do. Often, local tomb raiders will dig right through valuable ancient inscriptions, hoping to find gold hidden in the rocks. “Every time you find a site, you have to act as though it is probably the last time that you will see that site intact,” Darnell said.
Perhaps the most incredible tale Darnell told involved chasing after a cadre of thieves that he, with his team and a group of soldiers, had frightened away from a site. As they drove back from the site, they noticed a large object the size of the house on the horizon. As they neared it, they realized that it was a quarry dump truck, a tall vehicle that requires a ladder to make it up to the driver’s seat. It clearly had no business out on the desert road, and when the vehicles finally neared each other, both stopped.
“At first,” said Darnell, “everyone was frightened, and then we realized, ‘Hey, we’ve got all these AK-47s and other sorts of arms.’” The soldiers fell into a loose skirmishing position. But a few heads popped out from the back of the dump truck and explained the situation. As it turns out, the truck had been borrowed by the police from a local quarry; they had captured one of the antiquities thieves and were looking to bring him out to Darnell’s team. Not having any vehicles that could handle the rocky terrain, they took a quarry truck out into the desert, thief in tow.
Of course, Darnell’s important work is much more restrained than chasing after thieves and tombs. Part of what makes his team interesting is that it is not focused on the traditional (and much glorified) strongholds of Egyptology in the Nile Valley. Rather, it explores the desert caravan routes, something that is rarely done and which has provided a wealth of new information on the culture of ancient Egypt. “It’s like you have the same incomplete puzzle, and you’re still trying to make those pieces fit, but they just don’t,” Darnell said, and explained that his goal with his desert data is to help find those pieces. He pointed out that, far from being isolated or irrelevant, the caravan routes actually have a great deal to say about Egyptian history: “You can be on an interstate highway, out passing through some large wooded area, but you’re not really in the middle of nowhere. You’re in a narrow, long, stretched-out strip of somewhere.”
Because Darnell’s research angle is fresh, his team has been able to close gaps in Egyptian history. They’ve found the earliest historical document from Egypt, the Scorpion tableau, and the earliest-known alphabetic inscription.
And his originality shows in the classroom. Ashley Young ’10, a student of his and the creator of the “Man, Myth, or Legend” Facebook group, couldn’t say enough in praise of Darnell’s unusual tactics and striking charisma. “He has such a command of historical knowledge that students can’t help but be in awe of him… He made ancient Egypt come alive in my eyes,” she said. She has particularly fond memories of quirky moments in class, such as when Darnell accidentally took a chunk out of a classroom chair with an ancient sword, or when he taught his students how to send Roman smoke signals to each other.
By the time I left Darnell’s office, I was tempted to join the Facebook group myself. As I walked out, he asked Manassa to bring me a Yale Egyptology T-shirt, and he was as enthusiastic about its hieroglyphic lux et veritas as he was about AK-47s and undiscovered alphabets. Watching him range from his wild adventures to his love of mundane minutiae, I found him about as fascinating and inscrutable as the hieroglyphics he studies. Here is a man who deserves his myth.

Yale Daily News:


Darnell suspension rattles Egyptology


When John Darnell agreed to a one-year suspension from the Yale faculty following numerous University policy violations, he left the Egyptology division of the Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Department without a chair and with just one full-time faculty member — associate professor Colleen Manassa ’01 GRD ’05, with whom he allegedly had the intimate relationship that led to his suspension.
Darnell, the only tenured Egyptologist at the University, served as chair of the NELC Department prior to his suspension and advised all seven Egyptology graduate students. Eckart Frahm, acting NELC chair, said he and Graduate School Associate Dean Pamela Schirmeister are in the process of establishing a “committee structure” advising program for Egyptology’s seven graduate students, who he worries will suffer from the effects of Darnell’s suspension even after they graduate and advance in their careers. Frahm said it would be “naive” to suggest that Darnell’s resignation and suspension will not taint the reputation of the department in the field, calling his departure a “huge psychological blow” to NELC.
“Clearly what we have to deal with right now is a rather major crisis that affects mostly the graduate students in Egyptology,” Frahm said.
Darnell announced his resignation as NELC chair in a Jan. 8 email to graduate students and faculty in the department, citing an intimate relationship with a student under his direct supervision and with a professor whom he reviewed as reasons for his departure. Since his suspension, multiple sources have told the News that the person involved in Darnell’s violations was Manassa, who allegedly began an affair with Darnell in 2000, according to divorce documents filed by Darnell’s wife before the Connecticut Superior Court on Nov. 5, 2012.
Frahm said he is determined to minimize the effects of Darnell’s resignation and suspension, especially for the Egyptology graduate students.
“Students shouldn’t be held responsible for anything outside their control,” Frahm said.
Frahm said he plans to meet with Schirmeister in the next two weeks to finalize the official structure of the advising committee, in which each graduate student will be assigned one primary adviser, as well as at least two additional professors or professional Egyptologists to consult on drafts of their dissertations. While members of the NELC faculty said they are willing to step into advising roles, Frahm said he also has been in talks with potential advisers at other universities and met privately with each graduate student.
Despite Frahm’s efforts, Egyptology students remain concerned for their academic career prospects.
One Egyptology graduate student, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to a reluctance to be associated with Darnell’s resignation, said the disciplinary action taken against Darnell has resulted in an “unfortunate situation” that affects all Egyptology students to varying degrees. The student added that the Egyptology students have been approached by Graduate School administrators, who expressed their intention to work with students for the betterment of the program as a whole, and have been assured by Frahm and Schirmeister that the graduate students are their first priority.
Though another Egyptology graduate student said the program’s small size means that fewer classes will be offered to the students during their course-work years following the suspension, Frahm said he does not anticipate that the department will struggle to provide teaching in Darnell’s absence.
Manassa, who serves as director of undergraduate studies for NELC, declined to comment on the effect of the department’s leadership transition on undergraduates. She is currently the only Egyptologist on the NELC faculty.
Frahm said he does not think Darnell’s resignation and suspension have had an “enormous impact” on the other two subdisciplines of NELC — Arabic Studies and Assyriology. NELC graduate students said the three NELC subfields operate essentially as three different departments, despite the fact that they share the same administration. Arabic professor Beatrice Gruendler said her students have not interacted extensively with Egyptology and were “not at all affected” by Darnell’s absence.
Five graduate students in other NELC subdivisions said Darnell’s absence will not impact their research, adding that Frahm has fulfilled his duties as acting chair.
The NELC Department has a total of 21 graduate students across its subdivisions.

Yale Admits to Covering Up for Adultery, But Do Not Expect WELS To Follow Suit

$
0
0
Darnell used to matriculate with his wife,
then he switched to an undergraduate,
who graduated in Egyptology, under him,
earned a PhD under him,
and also got tenure under him,
always with his enthusiastic support.



New details in Darnell suspension

  • John Darnell and Colleen Manassa ’01, ’05PhD.
When tenured professor John Darnell announced his suspension from the Yale faculty last week for sexual misconduct, he did not name the student-turned-colleague with whom he had an improper relationship. But last October, Darnell’s wife did just that in a publicly available divorce court filing, asserting that Darnell began an affair with Colleen Manassa ’01, ’05PhD, in 2000.

Darnell, a prominent Egyptologist, last week announced his resignation as chair of the department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations and his one-year suspension from the faculty. Officials confirmed to the Yale Daily News that the suspension is unpaid and that Darnell will also not serve as director of the Yale Egyptological Institute during that time.

In an January 8 e-mail to colleagues, Darnell acknowledged several violations of Yale policy, starting with “maintaining an intimate relationship with a Yale student, who was under my direct supervision.” In addition, “I violated the provisions of the Faculty Handbook by participating in the review of a faculty member with whom I had an intimate relationship,” he wrote. “Finally, I improperly used my leadership role in Egyptology at Yale in an effort to ensure that these policy violations would not come to light.”

After Darnell’s e-mail became public, anonymous sources named Manassa and contended that the affair began when she was a student and continued while Darnell’s department hired and then promoted her. The divorce filing, which the Yale Alumni Magazine obtained from Connecticut Superior Court, is the first on-the-record identification of Manassa. In 2000, when the affair allegedly began, Manassa was an undergraduate.

Reached by phone, Manassa says: “I really have no comment on the matter.” Neither John Darnell nor his estranged wife, Deborah Darnell, could be reached for comment after several attempts.

John Darnell filed for divorce in August 2012, saying the 23-year marriage had “broken down irretrievably.” Deborah Darnell—also an Egyptologist who collaborated on projects with her husband, but is not a member of the Yale faculty—filed a cross-complaint alleging that “on diverse days since 2000,” her husband “committed adultery with one Colleen Marie Manassa.”

Manassa earned both her bachelors degree and her PhD in Darnell’s department, known as NELC, which hired her as an assistant professor in 2006 and promoted her to associate professor in 2010, according to her faculty page. She is currently the director of undergraduate studies. She is not known to be accused of violating any Yale policies.

During Manassa’s student years, Yale policy prohibited faculty members from having consensual relations with students they taught. That is still the case for relationships between faculty and graduate students. In 2009, the university barred faculty from  “sexual or amorous relationships” with any undergraduates, regardless of whether they were their teachers.*

John Darnell apparently participated in his lover's hiring and/or promotion, a conflict that his e-mail acknowledged as a violation of the Faculty Handbook.

A senior faculty colleague says in an interview that Darnell improperly participated in “more than one” employment decision involving his lover, whom the colleague declines to name. The colleague—Benjamin Foster ’75PhD, an Assyriologist and former department chair—says that while Darnell’s “announcement came out of the blue, the basic situation has been known for a very long time,” because “Yale’s a village.”

Foster declines to explain why the improper relationship was allowed to continue for so long or how it finally came to light.

In recent years, critics have accused Yale of not taking sexual misconduct complaints seriously enough. The university has overhauled its handling of such complaints and now releases semiannual reports documenting their number and nature and how they are resolved.

In his four decades at Yale, Foster says, “I’ve never heard of a faculty member being suspended.”

Who Is Left Standing? A Marriage and a Department Are Wrecked, So Colleen Is the Only Egyptologist at Yale for Now

$
0
0
http://neveryetmelted.com/2013/02/02/scandal-strikes-yale-egyptology-department/

And who’s left standing?


When John Darnell agreed to a one-year suspension from the Yale faculty following numerous University policy violations, he left the Egyptology division of the Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Department without a chair and with just one full-time faculty member — associate professor Colleen Manassa ’01 GRD’05, with whom he allegedly had the intimate relationship that led to his suspension.

Hat tip to John Brewer.

Colleen Manassa
StumbleUpon.com
3 FEEDBACKS ON "SCANDAL STRIKES YALE EGYPTOLOGY DEPARTMENT"

NUKEBUBBA

A little more eye makeup and she will look like one of the musician women on the walls of the Tomb of Nakht. Does her mummy know how she is behaving?


GOOSE GANDER

Nice way to get a promotion – sleep with the boss and get him fired.
If he violated the policy, why is she not also suspended? Presumably she knew about the policy, and the breaking of it, and did nothing to report it. I’m not sure that I see that much difference between what he did, and what she did. (Presuming that it was all consensual.)

Busta Gut Has a New Ministry

Ah, But No Opposition Party Really Exists in Lutherdom.The SynCons Are Me-Too Leftists Who Follow ELCA Like Ducklings

$
0
0
The Lavender Network is happy.
WELS and Missouri will continue to work with ELCA
and deny it.
They recognize women's ordination by default
and already participate in gay ministry,
through multi-culturalism hatched at Snowbird.


Two Opposing Views of Anglicanism now Dominate the Anglican Communion One will win; the other will lose. Archbishop Welby faces his kairos moment

News Analysis

By David W. Virtue DD 
www.virtueonline.org 
August 28, 2013

Two distinct views of the Anglican Communion emerged this week that are worth contemplating because one of them will dominate the Anglican Communion and the other will not.

Archbishop Justin Welby's recent doomsday warning that a feuding church is "on the edge of a precipice" is indeed true. The archbishop issued a dramatic warning that the worldwide Anglican Church is tottering on the brink of complete disintegration amid bitter disputes between liberals and traditionalists.

In his most stark comments yet about divisions over issues such as homosexuality, Welby said the Church is coming perilously close to plunging into a "ravine of intolerance". He likened the collective behavior of the church to a "drunk man" staggering ever closer to the edge of a cliff. He added that many of the issues, which different factions in the church are fighting over, are simply "incomprehensible" to people outside it. He even drew parallels between the crisis afflicting the 77 million-strong network of Anglican churches and the atmosphere during the English Civil War.

The Archbishop of Canterbury needs to be reminded of how we got where we are and how it could be resolved.

First. He inherited the whirlwind from his predecessor Archbishop Rowan Williams who saw the writing on the wall and fled to academia nine years before he had to. That should have been a tip of the hat. Most journalists with half a brain knew this was not going to be an easy ride and may not end well. If Welby had taken the trouble to read a number of orthodox Anglican blogs that have been writing about these issues for years, he would have been forewarned and therefore forearmed.

Second. Evangelicals (he is one himself) and Anglo-Catholics did not start this pansexual war; they only want to preserve what they have received. It was begun first by revisionist Bishop Michael Ingham of New Westminster, BC by his act of blessing same sex unions in 2002 in defiance of the 1998 Lambeth 1:10 resolution. By doing so, he began an historic voyage of spiritual destruction from the faith delivered once to the saints into a world of sexual behaviors proscribed by Scripture. Ingham was aided and abetted by bishops like John Shelby Spong, Walter Righter, Frank Griswold, Tom Shaw and many more. There was no push back; they proceeded without interference and spread their cancerous sexual doctrines maintaining, over time, that Scripture (by a sexual sleight of hand) supported them or that God had changed His mind. Nobody dared oppose them. There were no inhibitions or depositions. They would come later -- not to them, but to orthodox bishops who opposed them.

This is how it is done. The takeover begins inauspiciously enough. First, they infiltrate solidly grounded orthodox parishes. Over time, they cajole people into believing that sexual inclusivity, especially sodomy, is acceptable because some poor sod dies of AIDS and his parents believe the church should change its thinking and teaching to accommodate him. Before you know it, the parish priest has a case of misplaced compassion and it is all over. The orthodox are made to feel homophobic for not demonstrating enough pain, for not being inclusive and showing enough diversity. In time, the liberals win. The parish abandons historic teaching on sex and marriage while the orthodox leave. The parish then begins to wither and die. It is all done, of course, with the blessing and nod of the now liberal bishop.

Third. Global South Anglican leaders repeatedly warned Rowan Williams that the actions of North American bishops were communion-breaking acts. They alerted him persistently of the consequences if he continued to prevaricate and do nothing. Gene Robinson's consecration as an openly gay bishop was the final straw. Unable to concede that the Bible is definitive, Williams waffled and waffled. Failing to resolved anything he conceded defeat and left office his tail between his legs. Hardly a commentator had a good word to say for him. The Archbishop of Nigeria, Nicholas Okoh ripped him one saying that when Williams came into office, things were good. By the time he left, the communion was in shambles. Prior to this Williams got an earful from Frank Griswold at Dromantine, Ireland for not challenging the Global South over homosexuality. To make their point a third of the bishops stayed away from Lambeth 2008 while a third of the primates failed to show up in Dublin a couple of years later. What about these last two historical acts does Welby not understand?

Fourth. The vast majority of Global South leaders in Africa, Asia and Latin America were won to Christ by British missionaries who had both a clear fix on the gospel and an equally clear fix on sexuality. No compromise. None. These missionaries won thousands to Christ. The seeds they planted won millions more to Christ. Today Africa is the biggest, fastest growing corner of the Anglican globe. By contrast, Western pan-Anglicanism is aging and dying with not a prayer of winning Millenials for Christ. Most rectors and nearly all the bishops, except a small handful, wouldn't know how to lead anyone to Christ if their own lives depended on it. They are too ashamed of the gospel; do not believe in the total exclusivity of the "One Way" to heaven, or the unique Sonship and deity of Christ and the unique salvation he offers. They would sooner sit down over lunch and chat up Muslims about the need for more interfaith talks, while Muslims in countries where they have never been stifle religious dissent, harass and persecute minority Christians and torch their churches. Has there been a serious Muslim Mullah in America who has raised his voice against the rampant killing and destruction of Christians, say in Egypt or Syria?

Fifth. Welby is a self-professed evangelical who got converted following the untimely death of his daughter. He got involved with Holy Trinity Brompton and became a big ALPHA fan. So why is he hesitating in calling the game as he sees it? He knows full well what Mrs. Jefferts Schori thinks -- if he doesn't, he shouldn't be archbishop. He knows what Gene Robinson and Mary Glasspool do in bed. Does he think that is holy living? He has talked with ACNA Archbishop Bob Duncan. He knows full well why Canadian Archbishop Fred Hiltz visited him and told him not to recognize the Anglican Church in North America. Welby knows he has more in common with Archbishop Donald Harvey and his successor Charlie Masters as the leader of the Anglican Network in Canada than he does with Fred Hiltz, so why all the agony? Welby said the Church had to steer a course between, on one hand, compromising so much that it abandoned its "core beliefs" and, on the other, becoming so intolerant that it fractured completely.

So the first part of that sentence is true. The church cannot abandon its core beliefs. But the Episcopal Church has already done that. Where's the new news there? The Episcopal Church has abandoned core doctrine over salvation, Jesus himself (Jefferts Schori called him "our mother Jesus"), and says the resurrection of Jesus is spiritual, not actual and physical. How much more blasphemy does he need to know about? Added to this, Jefferts Schori has denied the necessity for personal salvation, a totally core doctrine for ALL Christians in whatever denomination they are in. How much more evidence does he need. And who exactly is being intolerant? TEC's homosexuals are totally intolerant of anyone who opposes their behavior. Why in God's name have 100,000 or more Episcopalians departed TEC? With each passing general convention, homosexuals and lesbians have become more strident, more demanding and more remorselessly hateful of orthodox Episcopalians. They even have their own Eucharist to push sodomy down the throats of everyone. Intolerance, dear Archbishop, lies squarely on the other side of the ecclesiastical ledger.

Sixth. The orthodox did not leave The Episcopal Church or the Anglican Church of Canada; the church left THEM. When they protested, they were called out for being uninclusive and lacking diversity by sodomites like Louie Crew (USA) and Colin Coward (UK) and on the lesbian side by Susan Russell and Mary Glasspool...to name just a few. Then most of the seminaries turned (as has TEC's one university - Sewanee) and the next generation of pro-gay pansexualists was born. Does Welby honestly think that the lesbian president of the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, Mass who is married to another woman is going to produce spiritual fruit for purpose. Following Robinson's consecration Episcopal churches began to empty faster than a blocked sewer pipe being reamed out by a motorized plumbing snake. Today, more than 37% of all parishes cannot afford a full time priest. Over the next five years, that will reach 50%. It will all be downhill from there.

Seventh. The whole pansexual revolution was begun by one man - Louie Crew -- and morphed into the misnamed organization known as Integrity. Then, with a small number (less than 2 percent of the church) of people, they set about changing the whole discussion on sexuality in consort with a handful of closeted pro-homosexual and homosexual bishops. The gay PR campaign has been the most brilliant study in ecclesiastical politics since the Civil Rights movement even though neither has anything in common with the other.

Eighth. Why was ACNA formed if it wasn't initially in reaction to TEC's theological and spiritual waywardness? Is this some ecclesiastical mirage that Welby thinks will just disappear one day because Fred Hiltz would like it to or when Archbishop Duncan retires? In fiction, perhaps, but not in reality.

Nine. What about all the tens of millions of dollars spent on lawyers to litigate all the property disputes. Why won't Welby whip up a little spiritual frenzy and cite St. Paul about not taking brothers to court and "being defrauded" instead? Why doesn't he have something to say, being evangelical and all, about his fellow evangelical and Anglo Catholic priests who have been tossed out of their parishes, lost their salaries and pensions while members of their congregation who, fed up, drifted to independent evangelical churches, the Orthodox and Roman churches or simply dropped out altogether? And what is he really doing about preserving his Anglo-Catholic wing in the Church of England over their refusal to have a woman bishop. Are they history? Many think so.

Ten. Welby says he plans to visit all the provinces over time. So far he has made forays into Guatemala, Mexico and the Middle East. These are not major players. They receive (money) more than they give and their congregations are small and, in the case of the Middle East, under persecution. So what will he say when he meets TEC's Jefferts Schori? Will he publicly lament about the divisions in the church without addressing who it was who created the divisions? Will he shout even louder about the need for reconciliation when all that does is make Evangelicals and Anglo-Catholics roll their eyes and say what the blazes doesn't he understand?

Eleven. Will he make a cameo appearance at GAFCON II in Nairobi in October after first signing The Jerusalem Declaration. After all, these really are his peeps, not the liberals he is floundering about with and trying to make nice with talk of reconciliation.

Twelve: "We struggle with each other at a time when the Anglican Communion's great vocation as bridge builder is more needed than ever," said Welby. Answer. Anglican liberals are building bridges to nowhere. Conservatives are winning millions to Christ. They have a bridge and it's not too far and the end is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. And Welby must know that.

Thirteen. Welby needs to know that secretly the liberal pansexual West despises him and his "simplistic" ALPHA evangelicalism. They see it as fundamentalist, anti-scientific, simplistic and not in tune with post-modernism and the Millennial Generation who are more attuned to "spirituality" talk and more concerned with the latest in tech toys and instant communication.

Fourteen. This past week half a dozen (Episcopal) Communion Partner bishops raced across the Atlantic and sat down and prayed with Welby and then issued a statement that said, "It is our vocation as Communion Partners to navigate this narrow path between two dangerous extremes as we pursue the mission of the Church "to restore all people to unity with God and each other in Christ." Say what. If one "dangerous extreme" is Jefferts Schori and the liberal and revisionist HOB, that's true. But who is the other "dangerous extreme" - ACNA? FCA/GAFCON? It was Bishop Greg Brewer (one of the six) when he was a TEC priest who led the worship at GAFCON I in Jerusalem. Now he is saying they are a "dangerous extreme"?

The worldwide Anglican Church is already split de facto if not de jure. The liberal provinces in North America and Europe have already made their bed. They won't be moved out of it, short of a Holy Spirit revival that is not on the horizon. No one is going to rescind Gene Robinson's papers or depose the lesbian Glasspool. Not going to happen.

This is Welby's kairos moment. Will he step up to the plate and declare those provinces out of communion because THEY do not hold fast to the Apostolic faith and teaching? Will he not invite them to future primatial gatherings or the next Lambeth Conference? Will Welby say, equally as boldly, that he stands with orthodox (read Evangelical) archbishops in Africa, Asia, Latin America and Sydney?

If he does not, then he could lose the communion. GAFCON II could be just the decisive kairos moment for the vast majority of Anglicans who are faithful believers. It is Welby's to lose...it is also his to win.

"It is a dangerous place, a narrow path we walk as Anglicans at present," he said in Mexico. But it is the narrow pathway that leads to eternal life by way of the cross. Just ask John Bunyan.

END
Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>