Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11615

Dr. Lito Cruz Quashes the Argumentation of UOJ

$
0
0

The UOJ Hive is always discovering a new insight
outside of the Book of Concord,
but they never explain how this simple statement destroys their fantasies.
They must have the Satanic Easter absolution of the unbelieving world
as their comfort. The Gospel will not do for them.
http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/11/johann-gerhard-on-1-timothy-316.html#comment-form

LPC said...
Joe,

I am a mathematician and logician by training. We do not accept self contradictory statements. We recognise paradoxes, they are puzzlements, but we will not accept self contradictory assertions. Why? There is an axiom that says - ex falso quodlibet - from a contradiction, you can deduce anything you like. That makes your belief system nonsensical, which is what happens when one accepts the self contradiction and sophistry of UOJ teachers.

Romans 1:8/2:5 It is a drastic statement to say that God has no wrath for any man. The Book of Revelation has plenty to teach about the wrath of God. According to Scripture God is holding off his wrath, Romans 9:22. To withhold his wrath does not mean he has no more wrath. UOJers are guilty of making a jump from Atonement to Justification skipping faith in the process. You do the similar thing in jumping the gun in stating that God has no wrath for any man. UOJ is a rationalistic overstatement, and so your statement is in keeping with your philosophical source.

LPC
***
GJ - Dr. Lito Cruz has many fine posts here. I am going to repost his latest now. 

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 11615

Trending Articles