↧
11,111 Posts on Ichabod
↧
Another Stolen Church, Episcopal Style. VirtueOnline - NewsSome Alienate Congregations with an Ordination, Some with the NNIV
VirtueOnline - News:
NEWPORT BEACH, CA: Court Pushes Rector and Parishioners out of St. James
Plans are in place for a new church location, says evangelical Anglican rector
By David W. Virtue
www.virtueonline.org
August 9, 2013
After nine years of legal wrangling, the $20 million church property of St. James Anglican Church, Newport Beach, CA, will revert back to the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles in September.
The Rev. Richard Crocker said the court imposed a $1 million bond and gave the church 45 days to clear the property if they cannot come up with the money. They will leave, however they will also appeal that decision, he told VOL.
In a letter to his parish Crocker said, "One of today's key decisions was the bond amount required which would allow us to remain on our properties during appeal. The Judge set a very large bond amount (in legal terminology, an "undertaking" of just under $1,000,000, which was far beyond what we considered appropriate or even possible. The alternative then left for us is that we will be required to move off the properties during the appeal process. He said attorneys negotiated behind closed doors allowing the congregation to remain on the property for 45 days, hold worship services, other events and do day-to-day church business until the properties are turned over on September 21."
Crocker added that as difficult as the change may be, they would transition well. "Be assured, plans are already in place for our new worship location." The plan calls for responding with pastoral care for parishioners with anger, grief, or other concerns, and the variety of ways we will remain connected in this important time.
In an e-mail to VOL, the priest wrote that the church is not conceding defeat. "The appeal will continue but the court has laid down financial conditions far beyond what we are prepared to pay for us to stay on the property during appeal, so we have to move off." The Vestry has resolved to appeal the decision of the lower court.
"St. James Church separated from the Episcopal Church in 2004, one of the first to do so in the current round, so we have had a long time to think about these issues. The possibility of a move has been there through that time, we have discussed the possibility many times, and we are expecting to take the vast majority of the congregation with us. The Vestry is firmly committed to orthodoxy in faith and morals."
Crocker noted that average Sunday attendance is about 300 spread over three services with different styles of worship at each service.
ELCA - ministry partner with the WELS, LCMS, and Little Sect on the Prairie. |
NO SHADOW CONGREGATION
Asked who would occupy the property once they have gone, the priest said there is no shadow congregation. "We are not aware of any plans for the continuation of Episcopal ministry and worship though it would not surprise us if the bishop arranged some sort of service to mark their occupancy - whether a sustainable congregation would emerge is another matter. Their victory is entirely pyrrhic."
Crocker said the life, ministry and staff would continue under a budget that should be similar to previous years. "The first Sunday in a new place will be the first Sunday of a planned Fall series outlining a new vision for St James Church. That is motivating me in the midst of all the legal and relocation matters."
He said that the revisionist Bishop of Los Angeles J. Jon Bruno and the lesbian assisting bishop Mary Glasspool were present at some of the court hearings, but neither party had much interaction.
"We are in good heart and have received many encouraging messages of support from near and far, and many testimonies of the blessings congregations can receive when they go through such a move."
"This is a new day. Though it will take time to adjust to this change, our parish family, our mission, and our Savior will remain the same. 'Jesus Christ is the same, yesterday, and today and forever.' Hebrew 13:8"
HISTORY
The parish finally split from the Episcopal Church in 2004 following the consecration of an avowed homosexual to the episcopacy in the person of Gene Robinson. St. James Anglican Church later became a parish in the Diocese of Western Anglicans in the Anglican Church in North America. Since 2004, the church has received national attention over its legal case against the Episcopal Church, forcing realignment over the Episcopal Church's departure from biblical faith and morals forcing the parish to withdraw from the national church and join with an orthodox Anglican province.
Starting with the leadership of Fr. David Anderson in the 1990s, (now a bishop in the Anglican Province of Nigeria), the church began to play an important role in the orthodox wing of the Episcopal Church. In 1996, new administration, fellowship and education facilities were completed and in 2001, a new sanctuary was completed. In 2002, Anderson retired and currently serves as Rector Emeritus. He was succeeded by Rev. Praveen Bunyan in 2003.
Years of conflict over doctrinal and ideological differences with the Episcopal Church led to a tense and frayed relationship. Under Bunyan's leadership, steps to disassociate with the Episcopal Church were initiated. In August 2004, the theological differences reached a point they believed they could no longer stay in TEC. This led the rector, wardens, and vestry to vote overwhelmingly to disaffiliate with the Episcopal Church and to affiliate with the conservative Anglican Church of Uganda. These Uganda parishes in the US later merged into the Anglican Church in North America. A parish vote also supported the decision.
St. James was later joined in secession by All Saints Church in Long Beach and St. David's Church in North Hollywood. All three churches were then sued for their property by the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles and the national Episcopal Church.
In January 2006, an Orange County Superior Court judge threw the lawsuit out, claiming that the Episcopal Church had no standing to bring their suit against St. James or the other two churches. However, in June 2007, a California appellate court reversed the decision. This led to St. James appealing the decision to the California Supreme Court, where it was widely-believed that the church would win, since there was no precedence in California history for a denomination confiscating the property of a local church which held the deed.
In January 2009, in an unexpected decision, the California Supreme Court ruled against St. James. The court stated that because it was founded as an Episcopal Church, it could not take the property with it when it seceded even though the church holds the deed to the multi-million dollar property. St. James is currently considering taking its case back to the trial court level and possibly an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In May 2013, Judge Kim G. Dunning reaffirmed her May 1 order to return the property to the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles.
Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church, sent a letter to Christianity Today magazine offering the campus of his Lake Forest, California mega church to St. James to use if they are forced to vacate their Newport Beach property. Rev. Crocker responded to Warren's offer with the following, "We are overwhelmed by his generosity. It is an encouraging sign of support from Christians in the community."
'via Blog this'
ELCA - Former Professor of Confessional Lutheranism - another UOJ guy. |
↧
↧
From a WELS Member
↧
There is Never a Good Reason For Liturgical Dance…
Liturgical popcorn goes well with liturgical dance. Bring on Koine and Fide for the cacophony. |
There is Never a Good Reason For Liturgical Dance…:
There is Never a Good Reason For Liturgical Dance…
August 8, 2013 By 54 Comments
… I loathe liturgical dance with the white hot passion of a thousand burning heretics. I don’t understand it’s purpose other than to keep the makers of spandex unitards in business. Even more baffling is why liturgical dance has to be performed inside a Church, a scared space. Or even worse, during the liturgy itself.
I suppose if the performers did their jigs, more appropriately, in a dance hall then it couldn’t technically be called liturgical dance, now could it?
But that begs the question… if the only thing making the dance number spiritual is the location and not the performance itself than how exactly is the spectacle supposed to religiously edifying? It would seem logical than to assume that just being inside a Church itself would be enough of a spiritual experience, making all that dance-y dance just empty theatrics. But that’s just crazy talk. A church, all by it’s lonesome, devoid of all that “active participation” can’t possible be spiritually uplifting.
“The Redemption of Bathsheba – “A collection of dances that evoke the spirits of the Bible’s most intriguing women.” – Saint John Chrysostom Byzantine Catholic Church, Pittsburgh, PA.”
Yeah …. Because that ginormous icon of our Blessed Mother isn’t doing enough to evoke the spirit. I need a writhing women splayed out across the sanctuary floor to tap into my feminine sense of intrigue.
Please people. Just say “No” to liturgical dance.
'via Blog this'
↧
Eleventh Sunday after Trinity. Luke 18:9-14. The Pharisee and the Tax Collector
The Eleventh Sunday after Trinity, 2013
Pastor Gregory L. Jackson
Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time
The Hymn # 200 I Know that My Redeemer Lives 1.80
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual
The Gospel
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn # 384 How Great Is Thy Compassion 1.6
Faith versus Salvation by Works
The Communion Hymn #236 Creator Spirit 1.9
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 514 God Moves in a Mysterious Way 1.81
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 514 God Moves in a Mysterious Way 1.81
KJV 1 Corinthians 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: 5 And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: 6 After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep. 7 After that, he was seen of James; then of all the apostles. 8 And last of all he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. 9 For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.
KJV Luke 18:9 And he spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others: 10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. 11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. 13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner. 14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
Eleventh Sunday After Trinity
Lord God, heavenly Father, we beseech Thee so to guide and direct us by Thy Holy Spirit, that we may not forget our sins and be filled with pride, but continue in daily repentance and renewal, seeking our comfort only in the blessed knowledge that Thou wilt be merciful unto us, forgive us our sins, and grant us eternal life; through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.
Faith versus Salvation by Works
KJV Luke 18:9 And he spake this parable unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others:
The Word of God is quite clear, so we must assume that people who think otherwise are anxious to insert themselves into the discussion as the only people who can interpret the real message of the Bible. They mean – “I know the real message, the part you cannot understand because you do not have my deep insights and great learning. After all, I studied Greek and Hebrew, and you did not.”
But those claims are wrong. The Word of God is plain, so clear that anyone can learn that he needs to know about forgiveness and salvation from the text itself. And yet the Bible is so profound that we can study it a lifetime and continue to learn more.
To show us how He works, God gave each Gospel a distinct message and style. Luke repeats much of what we have in Matthew and Mark, and yet we would never want to be missing the special, unique parts of Luke, such as today’s parable.
This first sentence tells us exactly what we should know about this section, which is only a few verses. Try to write a story in a few words and make a lasting impression on civilization. I have read many such thumbnail stories, and I cannot remember a single one.
This one we cannot forget.
He told a parable…
This alerts us to a fictional story with a spiritual message. There is no confusion about the genre of the following verses. If there is one thing we know about Jesus’ teaching, it is His use of parables. Some are fairly long (for parables) and this is quite short.
Parables normally have one major point and a few other points related to that important teaching.
What is the purpose of this parable?
To certain people (a) who trusted in their own righteousness and (b) despised others.
Thus in one sentence Luke introduced a parable so clearly that we have a plot and an outline of the very brief story. It does not take a homiletics professor to show that the people who trusted in their righteousness would be shown up in the story.
The Jackson Literal Translation (NJLT) has this, word for word, following the Greek word order –
He told—to those who believed on themselves that they were righteous and despised the others—this parable.
This may ring a bell for those who have heard about Universal Objective Justification, currently the stealth dogma of WELS, since they cannot admit in public what they really teach.
Does this literal wording perfectly describe those in the LCMS, WELS, ELS, and ELCA who believe in their own righteousness?
UOJ teaches them that they must accept, or make a decision, in favor of their own righteousness, because God declared every single unbeliever (sinner) righteous, according to the wisdom of Halle rationalistic Pietists.
The modern Pharisees believe in their own righteousness and despise all others who do not have this secret counsel taught by the ultra elite of Stephan’s sex cult and Wisconsin’s clone in Wauwatosa.
But this parable is not only meant for Pharisees of yesterday and today, but also for us.
10 Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican.
The Pharisees were ultra-saintly, very strict, and devoted to good works. They were highly educated, as we can see from Paul’s example, since he was a Pharisee.
Publican seems like an odd term, but it is not. The Roman Republic simply means the things (Re) that belong to the Public. Their banner said SPQR – the Senate and People of Rome. (q is for and)
The publican gathered taxes for the Roman Republic, which turned into an Empire under Caesar. At this point, during the Incarnation, it was an Empire ruled by Tiberius.
This reverses the common thought of the time – the Pharisees were the saints and the tax-collectors (publicans) were evil. The publicans did take advantage of their roles. If they extorted more money from people, they made more money. Imagine that happening today.
11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. 12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
The spirit of the Pharisee was continued in Pietism, which became the Christian form of Pharisaical holiness.
This holiness was based upon what people did or did not do. The Holiness code of Methodism was almost the same in German Pietism, except the Germans never gave up alcohol.
Some non-Biblical restrictions were:
- Never drinking alcohol of any type, including during Holy Communion. Welch’s grape juice was developed with the Temperance Movement in mind, since Welch had to find a way to keep grape juice from going into fermentation. He did this with pasteurizing. The Pietists of all Protestant groups made Welch’s a hit. There is a belt of grape juice communion churches still among American Lutherans of the old General Synod, which embraced the Temperance Movement.
- Never going to the theater. This stricture changed from era to era, adding all movies to the list, not just live theater.
- Never using tobacco. The new version is no tobacco, lots of marijuana, which is far harsher and more addictive.
- Never opening a store on Sunday or sell liquor on Sunday when retail was allowed.
Among Lutherans, Pietism created a religion of works, which included the requirement of cell groups and holding the cell group as the real church, despising those who did not attend a cell group. Since the cell group is THE Means of Grace, the Pietists have a very low regard for the Sacraments and often treat them as merely symbolic ordinances (laws).
Lutherans looking for magic answers were told to develop cell groups again, like the cell groups that Walther and Stephan brought over to America.
The Swedes and Norwegians had cell groups too.
Luther wrote, for the sermon on this text, that Luke seems to be promoting good works, which is the impression from other passages in the third Gospel.
But this is best explained by Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 7:15ff.
A good tree can only bear good fruit. Faith makes the tree good. Therefore, justification by faith is the beginning of good works, because both belong to God – faith and good works.
In contrast, a corrupt tree can only bear evil fruit. I was mowing and pruning yesterday. In the midst of growth here and there, junk plants grow. They spring up, shade the good plants, and produce abundant but useless vegetation. When they flower and fruit, they only bear bad fruit. They are cut away and removed because they cannot produce something worthwhile, for beauty or for food.
So Jesus teaches us about faith and works with that plain example. It can be applied both ways, showing lack of faith from the evil fruit of a corrupt (unbelieving) leader. Many think the cure for bad policies in the church is to argue, lobby, arrange votes, and “get our guy in.” That is completely wrong, so people continue to do that anyway. It is fun, unproductive, and a great way to form friendships and political alliances.
The cure is to address the problem of unbelief in the Word of God.
An Evangelical was telling me this week, “No one wants to teach what Jesus commanded. The Great Commission includes, Go, Baptize, and teach all that I have commanded.”
I agreed and said Luther’s whole emphasis was upon Jesus coming to us through the Word and teaching us.
The Matthew 7 passage and this parable from Luke teach the same in different words because they come from the same Lord and the same Spirit.
The Pharisee condemned himself for saying, “Look at what I do,” while despising the tax collector.
But the tax collector is different.
13 And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
We know he had faith because he saw the vast difference between God’s holiness and his sins. Instead of suggesting that God should thank him, he asked for God’s mercy. Only a person with faith would ask for mercy.
When Peter saw the divine power of Jesus the Son of God, he said, “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man.”
Moreover, we know the judgment of Jesus upon this tax collector, because He said,
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
As people admit, even when in the throes of UOJ addiction, justification in the Bible always means justification by faith. Forgiveness is received through faith, and justification is the word used to describe that forgiveness. God gives us the Gospel, which produces faith in Christ, and this God-given faith receives the forgiveness promised by the Word of God.
Because faith receives this forgiveness continuously, nourished by the Means of Grace, the believer is forgiven of all sins, each and every day.
The danger we face is growing Pharisaical, neglecting the Word and Sacraments, and no longer trusting in the Word. This does not happen at once or in sudden dramatic moments, but in slow, insidious ways.
The Parable of the Sower illustrates three general ways in which the Word is lost, but not because the Word lacks efficacy. Difficulties can be one reason. So can the cares and riches of the world. Many fall into a fascination with false doctrine, with something new. We tire of the truth and find falsehood to be a glittering temptation: exciting, new, enticing, emotional.
Although the liturgy changes almost all the words each week (and it could be 100% with many variations, such as a hymn liturgy), people got rid of the liturgy saying, “It’s always the same.”
Nothing is more “same” than contemporary worship services, where they get rid of the creeds, liturgy, appointed lessons, and hymns. A Pentecostal services is almost exactly the same as a Lutheran contemporary worship service. Lutherans are now copying the Pentecostal movie screen, too. And they cannot wait to tear out the priceless pipe organ.
The simple truth of the traditional worship service is that it gives Jesus to us – His Word, His body and blood, and His teachings. He condemns us for our unbelief and shows us once again to trust only in Him, not in our merits or worthiness.
Do we doubt His love for us? We only need to look at what He has done for us.
Thou Christian heart, Who ever thou art,
Be of good cheer and let no sorrow move thee!
For God’s own Child, In mercy mild,
Joins thee to Him; how greatly God must love thee!
Be of good cheer and let no sorrow move thee!
For God’s own Child, In mercy mild,
Joins thee to Him; how greatly God must love thee!
Paul Gerhardt
Quotations
"Now, that faith signifies, not only a knowledge of the history, but such faith as assents to the promise, Paul plainly testifies when says, Romans 4:16: 'Therefore it is of faith, to the end the promise might be sure.' For he judges that the promise cannot be received unless by faith. Wherefore he puts them together as things that belong to one another, and connects promise and faith."
Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article IV, Justification, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 135. Tappert, p. 114. Romans 4:16.
"Also they teach that men cannot be justified before God by their own strength, merits, or works, but are freely justified for Christ's sake, through faith, when they believe that they are received into favor, and that their sins are forgiven for Christ's sake, who, by His death, has made satisfaction for our sins. This faith God imputes for righteousness is His sight. Romans 3 and 4."
Augsburg Confession, Article IV, Justification, Concordia Triglotta, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921, p. 45. Tappert, p. 30. Romans 3 and 4.
"Identisch mit der papistischen Lehre, dass der Glaube nicht als Mittel und nicht allein rechtfertige, ist die andere papistische Lehre, dass die Werke rechtfertigen." "Identical with the papistic teaching, that faith alone is not a means and does not alone make righteous, is the other papistic teaching, that works make one righteous."]
Adolf Hoenecke, Evangelisch‑Lutherische Dogmatik, 4 vols., ed., Walter and Otto Hoenecke, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1912, III, p. 386.
"The article of justification is the master and prince, the lord, the ruler, and the judge over all kinds of doctrines; it preserves and governs all church doctrine and raises up our conscience before God. Without this article the world is utter death and darkness. No error is so mean, so clumsy, and so outworn as not to be supremely pleasing to human reason and to seduce us if we are without the knowledge and the contemplation of this article."
What Luther Says, An Anthology,3 vols., ed., Ewald Plass, St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1959, II, p. 703. June 1, 1537.
↧
↧
WELS-LCMS Ministry Partner ELCA Meeting in Pittsburgh
ELCA Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson: "It's getting better, Brett. We have leveled off and are starting to climb." |
Pittsburgh to host gatherings of split Lutherans - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:
Pittsburgh to host gatherings of split Lutherans
August 7, 2013 12:02 am
Share with others:
Bring on the lutefisk and sauerkraut : two Lutheran denominations are about to hold national gatherings in Pittsburgh .
Don't expect members of the 4 million-member Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and the 130,000-member North American Lutheran Church to share those church-supper favorites. The NALC is one of two splinter bodies created by theological conservatives unhappy with the ELCA's 2009 decision to permit partnered gay clergy .
There are diplomatic exchanges between their leaders, who will have representatives at each other's meetings. But it's more like a divorced couple striving for civility than a friendship.
The ELCA, which now has its first partnered gay bishop -elect, still has tensions over same-sex marriage and related issues. NALC is struggling with how to educate clergy without its own seminary . But both are concerned with how to attract members in an age when fewer people commit to organizations of any kind.
"We would like to see ways in which [the two churches] can be neighbors ... flowing from the great commandment to love our neighbor," said Bishop Donald McCoid, a former bishop of Pittsburgh and now the chief ecumenical officer of the ELCA.
"Obviously there are differences between the two church bodies or they wouldn't have left and founded another church. But they are a church, and we would hope that some of the comments that have been made, some of the things that have hurt, would stop. When you are hurt you can be angry, but that doesn't serve the Christian church very well."
Bishop McCoid, who attended previous NALC assemblies, is delegating an associate due to preparations for his own meeting. Bishop John Bradosky, who leads the NALC, will attend the ELCA assembly.
The NALC gathering opens with a theological conference Thursday and Friday. The weekend convocation will draw 700 delegates and guests to the Sheraton Station Square . About 3,000 people will attend the ELCA assembly Monday through Aug. 17 at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center .
Despite recent schisms , the ELCA is celebrating 25 years since it was founded as a merger of three earlier Lutheran bodies.
"This is a time of hope, but that's not to say the fight is over. For those for whom the fight is going on it's exceedingly unhelpful to be told the fight is over," said Bishop Kurt Kusserow of the Southwestern Pennsylvania Synod of the ELCA. After losing 17 churches to the NALC, his nine-county synod has about 70,000 members in 177 congregations.
"The largest portion of our church has the sense that we want to move ahead together into the future with hopefulness, and the 25th anniversary is a sign of that. ... But you don't have to look very deep to find folks who are really hurting," he said.
Although there is anger in the ranks, Bishop Kusserow showed Christian grace by nominating NALC for membership in the regional ecumenical body Christian Associates of Southwest Pennsylvania , said the Rev. Eric Riesen, pastor of Zion Lutheran Church in Brentwood and dean of the NALC mission district that includes Southwest Pennsylvania, West Virginia and parts of Maryland and New York .
"I think that there is a real effort to put the best construction on things," he said.
Bishop Kusserow said bishops and executives of other denominations questioned him about whether to admit a church that had gone into schism.
"I don't see preserving division to be in the interest of the church," he said. "We are called to do everything we can to preserve the unity of the church. I said it would be my choice to propose that NALC be admitted to this body as a sign that unity has been our interest all along."
But the losses have hurt, locally and nationally, he said.
"With fewer people, fewer individual congregations are viable, and those that are working with fewer resources," he said.
Lutheranism has long been divided into multiple churches. The 2.3 million-member Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod didn't attract many refugees from the ELCA because its theological convictions were to the right of most NALC conservatives. Some prominent conservative numbskull ELCA theologians became Catholic or Eastern Orthodox .
The ELCA had typically lost less than one-half of 1 percent of its membership each year in a steady attrition. But since the gay ordination decision, known losses averaged 3.5 percent, totaling 573,000 members.
The NALC started in 2010 with 17 congregations and is now nearing 400. Another splinter group, Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ has twice that many, but none near Pittsburgh.
The theological waters in NALC are calm, but it has large financial decisions to make about whether to start its own seminary. Currently Trinity School for Ministry , an Anglican seminary in Ambridge , has a Lutheran house of studies for NALC students.
"The question of how to train pastors is a big issue and it will be a continuing challenge," Rev. Riesen said.
Multiple tensions over sexuality remain in the ELCA.
Unlike other denominations that also accept partnered gay clergy, the ELCA requires a "publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous " relationship.
Its official policy doesn't permit same-sex weddings or blessings, while it requires ministers in same-sex relationships to receive the job benefits of married couples in states where same-sex marriage is legal .
"I think that those who are working for the full inclusion of all sexual minorities , not just gays and lesbians but transgendered people, believe their work has only begun. They have not nearly accomplished their goals and are very involved in debates about the states providing full legal marriage," Bishop Kusserow said.
"At the same time, others in the church believe that work has probably gone farther than it should when our commitment to scripture and to the confessions is taken into account. That struggle will continue."
He hasn't take a public position, although the local synod has long voiced opposition to gay ordination.
"I try not to lead with my personal convictions one way or the other. I've wanted to be able to pledge that I will honor the convictions of all the members of our synod and our church," he said. "I do believe that there are some matters of ... the way our church organizes itself that don't have to do with the moral right or wrong of how to treat people in same-gender relationships, where we have not been wise. We are confusing people."
Ann Rodgers: arodgers@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1416.
First Published August 7, 2013 12:00 am
First Published August 7, 2013 12:00 am
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/neighborhoods-city/pittsburgh-to-host-gatherings-of-split-lutherans-698341/#ixzz2bkokwaVW
'via Blog this'
***
Malefactor, Mark, and Matt |
GJ - Sometimes I wonder why I blog. I wake up and see the ministry partner of WELS and Missouri up to its old tricks, and no one seems to acknowledge this continuing relationship.
My first bishop, Kenneth Sauer, LCA Ohio, was happy to be a cheerleader for ELCA as it was forming. He chaired the bishops' conference, a powerless group of men and women kept busy to keep them from affecting the extreme Left agenda of ELCA. After almost 25 years of gay agenda obsessiveness by Herb Chilstrom and Mark Hanson, Sauer exclaimed, "What's going on here? I quit."
If he and the other NALC-LCMS crusaders noticed anything wrong in the LCA-ELCA, they never mentioned it.
The three blind mice of the Synodical Conference open their meetings with the Parable of the Pharisee and the Publican. Matt, Mark, and Malefactor pray, "I thank Thee, that our beloved synos is not as that other synod ELCA is - gayer than lavender hose, pro-abortion, Bible-rejecting, or even as this name- withheld blogger. We have a quia subscription to that old irrelevant Book of Concord, we build missions all over the place, thanks to Thrivent and Marvin Schwan."
The members and pastors all intone a loud, sonorous "Amen!" and ignore the facts. To acknowledge the truth would cancel the leaders' reservations at the Fat Cat Resort, where they meet with ELCA leaders.
Those brave souls of the LCMC and NALCA - they are returning to ELCA faster than lint to Velcro. They are joining the same ecumenical groups and expressing the same sentiments that got ELCA into its terminal swoon.
ELCA theologian Carl Braaten, the son of missionaries, outlined what he did not believe in his Christian Dogmatics, then gave his rationalistic background in his autobiography. He is the honored guest speaker for NALC-LCMC. They are like the Schwan customers who kept salmonella ice cream in freezer, going back for more after recovering from their latest bout of food poisoning.
Try to read his Church Dogmatics without projectile vomiting. |
Sound familiar? He is another UOJ fan misusing the slogan- the article by which the Church stands or falls. |
↧
UOJ Defense of UOJ: Hissy-Fit
That is money going to Murduch and the dogma of devils. |
WELS Resolution on Bible Translations
As requested by one of our Intrepid subscribers, we are posting below the resolution regarding Bible translations that was adopted at the 2013 convention of the WELS. The original document can be found here. The original resolution instructed NPH to choose from among the NIV2011, the ESV, or the HCSB. That resolution (b) was amended to remove the limitation to those three translations, allowing NPH literally to choose from any and every translation, as "it deems best."
Floor Committee 21: Translation Evaluation Committee (TEC)
Subject: Option 2
Reference: Book of Reports and Memorials, pp. 69-78; 211-215 (memorials 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 29, 30)
Resolution No. 1
WHEREAS 1) we strive to follow the direction found in Ephesians 4:2-3, "Be completely humble and gentle; be patient bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace" and in Philippians 1:27, "Stand firm in one spirit, contending as one man for the faith of the gospel”; and
WHEREAS 2) the TEC evaluation of the "Review of the 102" noted that each of the three translations (NIV2011, ESV, HCSB) "has some generally recognized strengths" but also "some generally recognized weaknesses" (BORAM, p. 73); and
WHEREAS 3) the TEC concluded that “As a committee we are convinced that all the precious truths of our faith are clearly taught in all the translations we have considered” (BORAM, p. 77); and
WHEREAS 4) the TEC has produced a four-part Bible study for congregational use to help lay people become more familiar with translational issues; and
WHEREAS 5) it is apparent that no consensus has developed in the synod for the use of a single translation, as is evident from the memorials submitted to the synod from a broad sampling of the districts that dealt with the translation issue; and
WHEREAS 6) Northwestern Publishing House (NPH) will be able to use NIV84 for current published products and may be able to continue to use it for some future products; therefore be it
Resolved, a) that the synod in convention adopt the second option of the TEC report, that WELS does not adopt a single Bible translation for use in its publications at this time but use an eclectic approach; and be it further
Resolved, b) that we encourage NPH to choose whichever translation it deems best for a particular publication; and be it further
Resolved, c) that all the congregations in the WELS be encouraged to use the four-part Bible study that the TEC produced; and be it finally
Resolved, d) that we, as members of the WELS standing firm in one spirit, contending as one man for the faith of the gospel, fix our hearts on this one unshakable truth: the Word of our God endures forever.
Pastor Joel Gaertner, chairman
Pastor Mark Gabb, secretary
ADOPTED
↧
Luther's Sermons on the Twelfth Sunday after Trinity. Mark 7:
Norma Boeckler |
Luther's First Sermon for the TWELFTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Mark 7:31-37.
This sermon appeared in pamphlet form under the title: “Of the deaf and mute man, Mark 7, preached by Dr. Martin Luther at Wittenberg, 1522.” It is also one of the collection of 14 sermons Luther published.
Text. Mark 7:31-37. And again he went out from the borders of Tyre, and came through Sidon unto the sea of Galilee, through the midst of the borders of Decapolis. And they bring unto him one that was deaf, and had an impediment in his speech; and they beseech him to lay his hand upon him. And he took him aside from the multitude privately, and put his fingers into his ears, and he spat, and touched his tongue; and looking up to heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him, Ephphata, that is, Be opened. And his ears were opened, and the bond or. his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. And he charged them that they should tell no man: but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it. And they were beyond measure astonished, saying, He hath done all things well; he maketh even the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak.
CONTENTS:
OF FAITH AND LOVE; THE FAITH, INTERCESSION AND MERITS OF OTHERS; THE SPIRITUAL MEANING OF THIS GOSPEL.
The contents of this discourse. 1.
I. OF FAITH.
1. Faith springs out of the Gospel and Word of Christ. 2-3. The nature of the Gospel.
2. The true character and nature of faith. 4.
II. OF LOVE.
1. The nature of love. 5-6.
2. Love should be voluntary and free. 6,
III. OF THE FAITH,MERIT AND INTERCESSION OF OTHERS.
1. No one can be saved through the faith of others. 7f.
2. To what end are the faith, intercession and merit of others of service. 8-14.
3. The ground of intercession. 14-15.
4. What is required in intercession. 16-18.
5. The power of intercession. 18-19.
IV. THE SPIRITUAL MEANING.
1. Of those who brought the deaf mute to Christ. 20-21.
2. Of Christ placing his fingers in the ears of the deaf mute.
3. Of the spittle Christ laid upon the tongue of the deaf mute.
4. Of the people praising God for the help.
5. Of Christ bringing the deaf mute to a certain place and looking up to heaven. 25.
The conclusion. 26.
Norma Boeckler |
SUMMARY OF THIS GOSPEL:
1. The faith of neighbors brings the deaf mute in order that he might believe when the devil is driven out of him.
2. The faith of others is helpful to one in so far as Christ gives him a personal faith. In this sense we pray for the Turks.
3. He, who is justified by faith hears the Word, and confesses Christ with the mouth, as these do here. This is new fruit of the new man.
4. That the Lord forbade them to tell any one, indicates Christ does not seek his own honor and glory.
1. Dearly Beloved: I hope you thoroughly understand this Gospel, for it is plain. However, as we have but one old story to preach, and since it is so precious and cannot be sufficiently considered, we will apply our text also to this old story, and briefly speak of faith and love. In the first place, we will look at the simple story of the text itself; then, if time permit, we will also speak a little of its spiritual meaning.
PART 1. THE STORY OR EXAMPLE ITSELF.
2. First, the story or example before us is good in itself, for here we see that many persons received the poor man, as though his distress were their own, bringing him to Jesus to be helped. By this, both faith and love are shown to us. Faith, in that they had heard of the Lord before, that he was kind and compassionate, and helped all those who came to him. For the Word must first have been heard, and must first have entered the human heart, showing us the mercy of God in such a way that we depend upon it.
Therefore the Word of Christ must here also have taught these people this; otherwise, where it does not come, there faith and works are all in vain.
3. And though this gospel lesson, like the preceding one, does not state that they had previously heard the tidings of the Gospel, yet we must nevertheless conclude, and the fact proves it, that they must have previously heard the good tidings and Gospel of Christ the Lord, through which they believed. For that is properly the Gospel which is called good tidings, a good report, not that which is written on paper, but that which is proclaimed in the world and becomes known by the living voice. Thus doubtless they had heard that Christ was kind, friendly, and helpful, willing to aid everybody; this was the beginning of their faith. Thus you must earnestly search the Gospel, and you will always find, that the tidings must first go forth and lead us to God, in order that he may’ lay the first stone; otherwise, all is lost. In the next place, you will learn that because they have clung to the tidings and trusted them for their comfort, they went thither, and hoped to receive of him what they had heard.
4. Now you here observe the nature of faith which grows out of the Word.
For the Word first sets forth to us the mercy and goodness of God; then faith causes us to cleave unto it with a firm confidence, and to obey the Word. For we are now conscious of this in our hearts, and are satisfied; for as soon as we believe, we are already with Christ in this inheritance, and are justified.
5. In the third place, this Gospel lesson describes the works of love in this, that these people go and care for the poor man, just as Christ, without their merit, and without their doing, sends forth his Word, and spreads abroad his goodness and mercy. Thus as they have :laid hold and drank from the fountain, they again flow forth freely, and also impart themselves to their neighbor freely and without any merit. Thus love should do its work, not as though it needs it, but devotes itself solely to the benefit of its neighbor, as Paul, among other things, speaks to the Corinthians about love, Corinthians 13:5: “Love seeketh not its own”; and to the Philippians he says, Philippians 2:4: “Not looking each of you to his own things, but each of you also to the things of others.”
6. This we may also learn here in these good people. They do not need this work themselves, nor do they look to themselves, but to the poor man, and think how they may help him; they seek no reward, but act independently and freely. Thus you should by right do likewise; if not, you are no Christians. Therefore consider carefully how love is here described, that it takes upon itself the care of others. If we accept this lesson, it will be well for us; but if not, then God will punish us with blindness, as he has been doing, to our grief, for nearly four hundred years. This much we say briefly concerning faith and love. Furthermore, we must now, in the fourth place, treat of the faith of other persons.
7. You know the fundamental truth is, that man cannot be just and acceptable before God, save alone by faith. So that they have lied and spoken falsely who have taught heretofore that we may deal with God through our works. Moreover it was much more foolish that they taught us to rely upon the works and faith of other persons, pretending that nuns, monks and priests can help other persons by their wailing which they perform in their cloisters at night, and that in this manner they can help other people and distribute their treasures. Therefore, let everyone here remember, that no one dare undertake to be saved by the faith, or by the work of another person; in truth, it cannot be done by the faith or work of Mary, or of any saint, yea, not even by Christ’s work and faith, but through your own personal faith. For God will not permit Mary, or any other saint, not even Christ himself, to take your place, in order that you might be godly and righteous, unless you believe for your own self. If Christ’s faith and work will not do it, you will much less accomplish it by the work or faith of all the monks and priests. Hence our Gospel lesson gives us an occasion to speak of the faith of others.
For here we read that they led this person to Christ in their own faith and work; the man did nothing toward it, but merely suffered it to be done.
8. Therefore let everybody mark well, that he can never be saved through another person’s faith. But it of course may happen, that by the faith of other persons you may be brought to a faith of your own. Likewise the good works of other persons may be of service to me to obtain works of my own. Therefore those lie, who declare that we may be saved through the works or faith of other persons, whether we ourselves believe or not.
No, this is not so! Unless you yourself draw out from God’s kindness and mercy a faith of your own, you will not be saved. Thus it must be; otherwise no other person’s faith or works avail, not even Christ, though he is the Savior of all the world; his kindness, his help will do you no good whatever, unless you believe in it, and are enlightened by it.
9. Therefore, by all means beware of the preachers whom you have often heard among the monks, who approach a dying person and say: “Behold, my brave fellow, do not despair; if you have committed sins, be sorry for them; but in order that you may fare so much the better, I will make you a present of my righteous life and my good works.” If now, the dying person accept such a gift, he is as much a fool as the other, and with all these works, he ‘will go to the devil. Therefore, beware of such consolation, and say: If you are willing to serve me with your good works, approach God and speak thus: O heavenly Father, by thy grace I am now believing; therefore, I pray thee, my God, give also unto this poor man a faith of his own. This might help me; but that you would give me your own faith, this you cannot do, neither would it help me. You will have enough to do to be saved by your own faith.
10. This you may see in the case of the foolish virgins, who, when their lamps went out, said unto the wise virgins: “Give us of your oil; for our lamps are going out.” Then did the wise ones answer and say: “Peradventure there will not be enough for us and you.” Matthew 25:8-9. In that case I am in need even of more faith for myself; how then could I share it with another? For my own faith must stand before God’s judgment, and must fight so hard and cleave so firmly to God’s mercy, that the sweat will run down its face, if it is to prevail. That is the true meaning of St.
Peter’s words, 1 Peter 4-18: “The righteous is scarcely saved, where then shall the ungodly appear?” For when death makes its onslaught, then such fear and agony will seize him, that he can scarcely with all his strength, stand for himself and be kept in faith. Hence it is greatly to be deplored that they have established so much deception, putting monks’ cowls upon the dead, and inventing other foolish things, by which they led poor souls straightway to perdition. Beware of them.
11. Now this I say, that you may know how far the faith of others may be of use to us, and how your own faith can help you. Other people’s merits will help you to attain a merit of your own, and nothing more. And though all the angels, yea, the mercy of God itself, were ready to stand for you, it would avail you nothing, unless you cleave unto it with a faith of your own. But it may effect this, that it will assist you to obtain a faith of your own, which will help you. Furthermore, even if Christ did die for us, and pledged and gave his body and life, blood and flesh for us, and became our advocate; yet it would avail nothing, unless we believe in him. But he can assist us in this way, that he appears before the Father and says: “O Father, this have I done for mankind; do thou give them faith, in order that they may enjoy it.” This then, will help us, if we feel assured that his works and merit are our own. In the same manner one should also speak of the other saints, that no saint’s intercession and merit avail unless we ourselves believe. You observe this also in our lesson. There lies the poor man, unable either to speak or to hear. They who bring him to the Lord can speak and hear. But they cannot make him speak by their hearing and speaking, and even though they all had come near him and said: “We will speak and hear for you”; yet he would, in spite of this, have remained speechless and deaf continually, and would never have been able to speak.
12. Likewise, if I were to give you a written declaration saying: “Go forth, this is my work; this shall be yours”; yet it will not help you a whit, but it will carry you into hell. In what way, then, will it help you? If I do, as these men do, who come to Christ and say: “O Lord, help this poor man, that he may receive his speech?’ They do not say: “We will hear and speak in your stead,” but they pray that Christ himself would give him speech. Likewise, if you take my part, and use your faith in such a way that it may help me to a faith of my own, this might help me; thus! thus it must be! God be thanked! Otherwise, no work nor any brotherhood, will avail.
13. Therefore say: I must neither rely upon your works nor you upon mine; but I will, by my own faith, pray God to give you a faith of your own. This is what is said, that we all are priests and kings, that we, like Christ himself, may intercede for one another before God, praying for personal faith.
Thus, if I happen to notice that you have no faith of your own, or a weak faith, I go and ask God to help, you to obtain faith, not by giving you my faith and my works, but your own faith and your own works; so that Christ may give him all his works and salvation through faith, as he hath given them to us by faith.
14. That is the meaning of the saying of Christ, John 16:26-27: “I say not unto you that I will pray the Father for you; for the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came forth from the Father.” This is a beautiful addition, as though he would say: I have prayed for you, and have entreated God that he would give you what is mine. Therefore know my name. For through my prayer he has accepted you and has given you faith, so that henceforth you may pray for yourselves, and I need not do it; provided that you do it in my name. Here he has crowned us, dedicated and anointed us with the Holy Spirit, so that we all are priests in Christ, and may exercise the priest’s office, go before God and pray for one another. This is what St. Peter means in writing thus in his First Epistle, 1 Peter 2:9-10: “Ye are an elect race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, that ye may shew forth the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light, which in time past were no people, but now are the people of God; which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.”
15. Hence we may all say: Christ was my priest, who prayed for me and purchased faith and the Spirit for me; therefore I am also a priest, and must go on praying in the world, that God may give faith also to this and that person. So we conclude, that we shall obtain whatever we earnestly pray for in the true faith, as the Lord says, John 16:24: “Ask, and ye shall receive.”
16. But to pray powerfully is not within our strength; for the Spirit does not always vouchsafe to us to pray with power. Paul prayed that all Israel might be saved, Romans 9:1f; why did it not come to pass? The difference lies in the faith, for the Spirit did not give it to him; had he been able to add this faith, it would surely have come to pass. For if Paul had said, “I pray for all Israel,” and had believed and said: “Lord, I am certain that thou wilt do it,” then it would certainly have come to pass. But though he often prayed for them from his heart, the Spirit did not vouchsafe, to him that he should confidently believe it. Therefore it is not within our power to pray in strong confidence; the Holy Spirit does it. Whenever we pray for anyone and are able to add, “It will be done,” then it will certainly be done; but whenever we pray, we must add, “Thy will be done.” If, then, I must let it go according to his will, I cannot suggest to him either the person, or the time, or the manner, but must freely leave it all to him; then, indeed, I am sure of it. In this manner Christ acted also, who himself prayed thus: “O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me,” but at once added: “Nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.” Matthew 26:39.
17. Therefore, when I am to pray for an entire city or community, I ought to say: “O Father, I pray for all of them.” Nevertheless, however, I must give honor to his name or will, and say: “Dear Father, I pray for these; I know it is thy will, that I should pray, that I should not despise prayer; but thy will shall be done always; for I might ask something for some one who is not worthy of it before thee; or again, I might possibly east aside some one who is worthy; therefore do thou act according to thy divine will, for thou wilt certainly do better than I could ever conceive.” Thus you see that we cannot always add these words: It will be so. But if we are certain in our hearts that we may add: “It will be certainly so,” then it will come to pass.
18. This we see in our text. These people approach the Lord in strong confidence, praying for the poor man, and their prayer is also heard. In the same manner, when baptism is performed we see this take place in the children’s faith. There are the infants, bare and naked in body and soul, having neither faith nor works. Then the Christian Church comes forward and prays, that God would pour faith into the child; not that our faith should help the child, but that it may obtain a faith of its own. If it has faith, then after that whatever it does is well done, whether it suckle its mother’s breast, or whether it soil itself, or whatever it may please to do. But if it does not obtain faith, our faith is of no value to the child.
19. Therefore my faith can help you in no way except that it may assist you to obtain a faith of your own. Hence, to sum up all, everything depends upon personal faith, as strong as it is, so much does it need the faith and prayer of other people in order to increase in strength. Now you can easily judge, that those people were the greatest fools, who held masses and vigils with the brotherhoods; for the wise virgins have sufficient oil only for themselves, and scarcely have enough. This is a simple explanation of the story of the Gospel lesson. Now let us briefly consider the meaning which our Lord puts into it.
PART 2. THE SPIRITUAL MEANING.
20. The people bring the poor man to the Lord, the Lord takes him to a special place, lays his fingers into the man’s ears, spits, and touches his tongue with the spittle, looks up toward heaven, and sighing, says, Ephphata, that is, Be opened! This is a lovely picture, and its meaning is good. For by those who here bring the deafmute to the Lord, the office of the ministry is meant. Ministers and the Apostles lead the poor consciences of men to God. This is done in three ways, by preaching, by a godly life, and by intercession. With the Word and preaching, they are brought to God; a godly life serves to show the Word so much the mightier in its power. But the Word itself leads to Christ, though it be preached by a sinner. Yet, a good life serves as an emphasis and a furtherance of the Gospel; while a wicked life dulls its edge. Their third duty, to pray for the people, likewise leads them on the road both to faith and to works.
21. Now if the Word go on its way in this threefold manner, it cannot fail to bring forth fruit, as God says, Isaiah 55:11: “My Word, that goeth forth out of my mouth, shall not return to me void.” This is indicated by the action of the pious persons who carry the mute into Christ’s presence; this signifies the ministers, who bring forward the sinner; then God appears, giving growth and increase, as Paul says, 1 Corinthians 3:7, He opens the sinner’s eyes, ears, and mouth. This happens in a wink of the eye, for God’s Word is like lightning, which in a moment passes from sunrise to the ends of the earth. Thus when such persons are brought to God, he gives them grace to believe.
22. This is signified by the act of laying his fingers into the man’s ears; through the Word he breathes the Holy Spirit into him, making the heart believing, decent, chaste, and holy; for the finger signifies the Holy Spirit.
23. Again, the spittle that is laid on the man’s tongue, typifies the Word of God; this is put into his mouth in order that he may be able to speak it. And this spittle, the Word of God, is a noble thing, but very bitter to the Old Adam.
24. Then they praise God, saying: “He hath done all things well, he has made the deaf to hear and the dumb to speak.” For wherever there is true faith, there the Spirit will not allow you any rest; you will break forth, become a priest, teach other people also, as we read Psalm 116:10: “I believe, for I will speak.” There the heart is full, and the mouth must run over. Then when they are persecuted, they will not care.
25. But the part of the story, that Christ took the man apart from the others, looks up to heaven, has this meaning: If God do not take me alone to a separate place, and give me the Holy Spirit, so that I cling to the Word which I have heard, then all preaching is in vain. But why does this require so much that he looks up to heaven and makes use of divine power, calling upon God’s grace to come and to act? By this he teaches us that such power must come from heaven, working in the heart of man by divine strength; then help comes to him. Again the spittle which is the Word of God is a noble thing for the Old Adam. Then they go forth to praise and glorify God.
26. Thus have you learned, from the story and from its spiritual or secret meaning, that we must first hear the Word of God and thus, through the intercession of Christ, obtain a faith of our own, and then we come out, confessing this and praising God forever. May this be sufficient on this Gospel lesson. Let us pray to God for grace.
--
Luther's Second Sermon for the TWELFTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Mark 7:31-37.
KJV Mark 7:31 And again, departing from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, he came unto the sea of Galilee,
through the midst of the coasts of Decapolis. 32 And they bring unto him one that was deaf, and had an
impediment in his speech; and they beseech him to put his hand upon him. 33 And he took him aside from
the multitude, and put his fingers into his ears, and he spit, and touched his tongue; 34 And looking up to
heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him, Ephphatha, that is, Be opened. 35 And straightway his ears were
opened, and the string of his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. 36 And he charged them that they
should tell no man: but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it; 37 And
were beyond measure astonished, saying, He hath done all things well: he maketh both the deaf to hear,
and the dumb to speak.
This sermon is given in place of the preceding sermon in edition c and appeared in pamphlet form under the title: “A sermon on the Gospel of Mark, 7th chapter, preached in the Castle Church at Wittenberg before the Elector and Duke Henry of Saxony by Dr. Martin Luther. Wittenberg, 1534.” At the close stands: Printed at Wittenberg by Nicholas Schirlenz, 1534. It appeared also in the edition of the Postil of 1543.
1. As the Gospel everywhere shows Christ our Lord to be a merciful and gracious man, ready to help every one by word and deed, in body and soul, so does this Gospel lesson picture to us how willingly he helped this poor man, who was deaf and dumb, in order that we might be invited to believe, trusting to obtain from him all that is good, and also thereby to show unto us an example and a pattern, which every Christian ought to follow, helping his neighbor in the same manner.
2. For a Christian life consists entirely in the following: First, that we believe and trust in Christ our Savior, being fully assured that we are not deserted by him, whatever need or danger may betide us. Secondly, that every Christian person also conducts himself toward friend or foe in the same way, as he sees Christ does, who is so willing to help everyone.
Whoever does this, is a Christian; but he who does it not, is no Christian, though he calls himself one. For these two cannot be separated; faith must be followed by its fruits, or it is not true faith. That is the sum of this Gospel lesson.
3. Now some have been agitated over the fact that in this miracle Christ first takes the poor man and leads him apart from the people, performs particular ceremonies, places his fingers in the man’s ears, and spits, and touches his tongue, looks up to heaven, sighs and uses peculiar language; whereas he had before helped other mutes and many not mutes without any such ceremonies, merely by a word. All this, I say, has set some to thinking, and they have explained it ‘that Christ in this case called to mind how this same man, whom he was now helping would afterward sin with his tongue and ears; therefore he had pity on him who would commit such sins after this great work was done, and that this deed of mercy would be so ‘little appreciated, in that a speechless tongue should become a blaspheming tongue, which would not only defame his neighbors, but even dishonor God in heaven; and the ears, which were opened in order to hear God’s Word, would rather hear all manner of erroneous and false doctrine, than the Word of God. This, they say. was the reason Christ sighed and looked up to heaven.
4. I will not reject this opinion; [so that it may not be said, that we are never pleased with anything, but want to have everything new and changed.] But, we must not, as it were, confine Christ too narrowly as though he had regard to one person only; we must regard him more highly than that he would help only this man. For all the Holy Scriptures, and particularly the prophets and psalms, declare, that he was sent to have deep compassion on all the misery and need of the whole human race, and that Christ was the person, chosen particularly above all saints, to be so minded toward us as surely to take upon himself all our need and sorrow as though they were his own, as in Psalm 40:12 he says of our sins, “Mine iniquities have over-taken me, so that I am not able to look up,” and in Psalm 41:4, “O Lord, have mercy upon me, heal my soul, for I have sinned against thee.” Here our merciful Lord speaks in our person, bearing our sins as though they were his own, and as though he had committed them himself. And again, Psalm 69:5: “O God, thou knowest my foolishness, and my sins are not hid from thee”; again, Isaiah 53:6’ “The Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all”; and vs. 4-5: “He hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows; the chastisement of our peace was upon him,” etc. And other passages of Scripture bear witness to this.
5. For the Lord Christ must be painted in such a manner that he is the only person who takes upon himself the misfortune, not of one country, or of one city, but of the whole world; even as St. John names him, John 1:29: “Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sins of the world.”
But if he bears the sins, it follows that he must also have borne whatever belongs to sin, and what follows sin, as the devil, death and hell.
6. That is the reason he sighs so here, as the person who was to do it, of whom the prophets had long before announced that he would have deep compassion upon all the evils of the whole human race. He was not alone concerned about the tongue and the ears of only this poor man; but it was a common sigh over all tongues and ears in general, yea, over all hearts, bodies, and souls, and all men, from Adam to the last human being, who is yet to be born. Hence he does not chiefly sigh because this man would in the future commit many sins; but the chief reason is that he, Christ the Lord, viewed the entire mass of flesh and blood which the devil afflicted with a fatal hurt in Paradise, making mankind deaf and dumb, and thus thrust them into death and hell fire. This view being before the eyes of Christ, he looked far about him, seeing how great the damage was, inflicted in Paradise by the devil through the fall of one man. He looks not upon those two ears, but upon the whole number of men who had come from Adam, and were yet to come. Therefore this Gospel lesson sets forth Christ as being the man who is concerned about you and me, and about us all in a way that we ought to be concerned about ourselves, as though he were sunk in those sins and afflictions ‘in which we are sunk, and that he sighs over the fact, that the very devil has brought about this ruin.
7. This surely is why he shows such great earnestness in this case, and makes use of special ways and means. As though he would say: “Your deplorable condition, your bondage in sin and death, affects me so deeply, that moved by nothing but by my own thoughts, I must act in a special manner.” For so extraordinary are his actions in this case, compared to his other works, that it is truly astonishing. He often healed others, or casted out devils, with a single word; indeed, he actually helped some whom he never visited, as for instance the centurion’s servant, Matthew 8:13; here, however, on account of two diseased organs, the tongue and the ear, his actions are very peculiar, as though he were especially concerned. By this he shows us that at this time he had a special view and special thoughts of the human race.
8. For as we admit that Christ, our Lord and God, had all other human traits, sin excepted, we must also concede, that he did not always have the same thoughts, was not always equally disposed, nor always equally fervent; but was variously actuated, just as other saints. Therefore, as his emotions and thoughts were peculiar in this case, his actions were also peculiar, so that we must see how truly human he was in body and soul, whose mind was not at all times alike disposed, just as little as he was always hungry and sleepy at the same time. As these conditions are variable in men, so they were variable in him, as St. Paul says, Philippians 2:7: “He took upon himself the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and being found in fashion as a man,” etc. This must not be understood merely of external appearances, but of his soul and the thoughts of his heart, that, being ardent at one time, he was more ardent at another time, etc. This, then, is one reason why Christ here acted thus, namely, because he is a real man; but at the same time a person who stood in the place of all men and took upon himself at the same time the diseases of this man, and of all men.
9. The other thought is also true, that he was deeply grieved by the knowledge that this man, if he would heal him, might sin greatly after he was healed. But it is too narrow to explain it as referring only to the future sins of this man. For it was the task of Christ, our Lord God, to concern himself, and to suffer, not only for one man’s sin but, as we read in Revelation 13:8, for all sins that would be committed from the beginning of the world, from Adam to our time, even unto the last man to be born before the day of judgment. Therefore their view is too narrow who explain it only of those sins which this man would yet do in the future.
Although he showed in other instances that he took account of the future life of certain persons, as he said to the paralytic, John :14: “Thou art made whole, sin no more, lest a worse thing befall thee.”
10. For Christ, our dear Lord, has so kind a heart that he grieves to think of a person sinning. For he is well aware that sins cannot remain unpunished; therefore he even wept over the city of Jerusalem, because he saw that her sins had to be punished. So kind and loving’ is his heart that he has by no means pleasure where sin is committed.
11. He addresses here particularly two organs of the body, the ear and the tongue; for you know the Kingdom of Christ is founded upon the Word, which cannot be apprehended or understood except by these two organs, the ear and the tongue, and he rules in the hearts of men alone by the Word and by faith. The ears apprehend the Word, the heart believes it; the tongue, however, speaks or confesses that which the heart believes. Hence, barring the tongue and ears, there is no perceptible difference between the Kingdom of Christ and that of the world.
12. For in regard to the outward life a Christian has duties like an unbeliever; he tills the ground, works his fields, and plows just like others, and he undertakes no peculiar work or deed, either in eating, drinking, working, sleeping, or anything else. But these two organs of the body make a difference between a Christian and an unbeliever; a Christian speaks and hears differently; he has a tongue which praises the grace of God and preaches Christ the Lord as being the only Savior, etc. This the world does not do; it speaks of avarice and other vices, preaches and praises its own glory.
13. In like manner the ears of both differ. A Christian’s ears have the same Word which the tongue preaches, and the heart believes; but the world prefers to hear one speak of her wisdom, understanding, honor and glory.
The ears and tongues of Christians are thus different from the ears and tongues of the world, or of unbelievers, caring nought for silver or gold, but only for that which is said of Christ, and how to speak and preach Christ.
14. Surely our dear Lord foresaw how much harm and misery would yet be caused by tongues and ears. It does great harm that Christians are persecuted, drowned, burned, and hanged, and that the world sets itself forcibly against the Word; but this harm does not penetrate all, nor will it win. For when it becomes known that persons are dealt with so very unjustly, they only grow bold and fearless thereby and despise such torture and suffering. Hence that is not the greatest injury with which tyrants afflict Christendom; but that piece of flesh which lurks behind the teeth, offers the greatest harm to the Kingdom of Christ. I am not now referring to people lying about and defaming one another; I am speaking of the higher things, that the tongue after Christ has loosed it and has given it the Gospel, should thenceforth inflict such notorious injury. It is true, the injury is not so glaring, and it appears to be much worse if a person’s head is struck off, than if a false prophet or writer comes forward; but a false sermon, yea even a false word, which comes whirling along in God’s name, will cut off a great number of souls, so that an entire city or country may fall under it.
15. This now is one of the afflictions which caused Christ to sigh; as though he would say: Be watchful! Beware of deceitful tongues which meddle with the Scriptures, more than of those which hold forth in the winehouse or in the grocery-store; though the latter are not harmless, yet when those tongues begin to speak which I have made loose so that they can boast of Christ, beware of them, etc. And in very deed, it is worth while to deplore the fact that those who have the Word and can talk much about it, should nevertheless persecute the Word with tongue and fist. The Turk also is a menace to Christendom, but his harm is inflicted only by the sword, and is in no way equal to the harm done by sectarians. There is need even now that one should sigh because such tongues which mislead so many people and still claim to be Christians, and to have improved the Christian Church. This is the first point, namely, that the devil, after the tongue is loosed and people know what Christ is, still inflicts injury by subverting the doctrine.
16. Hence Christ says, one will find corrupt ears which, though I have opened them, wish to hear nothing else but what such false, evil tongues say. As Paul says, 2 Timothy 4:3’ “The lime will come when they will not endure the sound doctrine, but, having itching ears, will heap to themselves teachers after their own lusts, and will turn away their ears from the truth, and will turn aside unto fables,” etc. Preachers who teach thus, are rogues and apostles of the devil. Now the others ought to be so godly as to say, I will not listen to their tongues. Aye, says St. Paul, they do not wish to hear the blessed tongue, but seek another; and in truth they find it, as it now happens among the sectarians of our day. Therefore, says St.
Paul, as their ears itch, so will he send them preachers who will forcibly lead them into error. Just as we saw, while under the Pope, that no one was able to withstand the slightest error, but their fictitious purgatory, indulgences, haunting spirits, and whatever was only new, was immediately held to be an article of faith. Thus did the devil rub their ears, so that they were much more willing to listen to such deceit than to the Word of God.
17. It is so even now. Our Lord God opens the ears so that the true Gospel is heard; yet wherever a sectarian turns up, the people immediately accept him, becoming so frenzied and so hostile to the true preachers that I am greatly perplexed how such excellent hearts to whom I would have entrusted body and soul, can grow so spitefully hostile to us, as though they were full of satan and sin much more grievously with tongues and ears than before they had the Gospel, so that it were much better that Christ had never made them whole, and that they had not heard his Word at all.
18. The meaning of Christ’s sighs then is, not only that he reviewed in his mind all afflictions from the beginning of the world, but that he deplored the certainty that after the revelation of the Gospel, his Kingdom should suffer so much harm through the very persons whom he would help, and that his Kingdom should be so buffeted and rent, which would not have happened, if men had not first been rescued by him. To be sure, he must bear it, and we must also bear it; but nevertheless, he will not on that account have sighed in vain.
19. And though the nature of his sighs is not fully stated here--for it cannot be written, as St. Paul says, Romans 8:26, that such sighs ca, not be expressed in written or spoken words — yet for all that, woe betide those who do such injury and make so little of this sighing, and go forth as though they had done well. For Christ was troubled by this with many and various harrassing thoughts, such as these: Behold, so much does it cost me, so much fear and torture I must bear, until I bring it about that these people hear my Word and preach it; and yet they will so shamelessly falsify and subvert it, and will do to me and my kingdom, such great injury’ This ingratitude toward the Word must hurt every Christian soul; hence it is not astonishing that it also moved Christ the lord so greatly, that he here uses special ways and ceremonies, because this thought struck him forcibly at that time.
20. We should learn now from these ceremonies and demonstrative actions, which Christ uses here, how earnestly Christ our Lord cares for us; we should diligently be on our guard to keep our ears and tongues in the condition in which he gave them to us, and fortify ourselves against the devil and against men, lest they change our ears and tongues to the contrary. Secondly, we should also, every one in his calling, show our gratitude toward his Word for this blessing in such a manner that a ruler in his country, a preacher in the pulpit, father and mother in the home, rightly fulfill the duties of their calling, while the others should hear it, keeping open their ears as Christ has opened them, and diligently see to it, as Christ acted in the case of this man, that they may also be as serious, and thank God for it.
21. Among us, God be praised, the tongue has been so developed that we speak purely, and that the ears gladly hear it; for there still are many pious people everywhere who take delight in hearing God’s Word. But side by side with this there is great ingratitude also among us, and frightful contempt for the Word of God, perhaps, indeed, a secret persecution and suffering. Other princes persecute it openly; but we here sit under shelter, as in a garden of roses, and yet secretly there are so many, citizens and peasants, and the noblemen with their golden chains, who would gladly hound all pastors and preachers out of tile country, if only they could do it.
This shows that they despise the Word and hate it secretly; as we see it is the case that, where the Word is persecuted openly, there only it would live, and where it is unhindered and public, there they do not want it.
22. But our Lord God will surely not have sighed in vain. Some think, indeed, that it will always remain so, because he keeps so silent about it; but it happens very quickly that a pulpit changes its character. Therefore our Lord God wants us here to take warning, as it was also predicted by St. Paul, in order that we should beware. Tongues will change their speech, and the ears of the people will itch after false preachers, even as it came to pass under the Pope’s rule, where people were so willing and eager to hear and to do, whenever anyone came along who had something new to say, no matter how unreasonable and foolish it might be. At that time, if anyone had risen to preach that a church should be built in the river Elbe, they would have done it. But now that the Word is being taught and preached from the pulpit, to trust in God and to serve our neighbor, the lives of the people nowhere are conformed to it. That is the doings of the very devil, but this does not excuse us.
23. For since the doctrine has been brought into such shape and form that the articles of faith are preached in their purity, and since the tongues are now loosed and the ears are opened, we should also apply ourselves that this doctrine may show itself in our daily lives. But I fear it will not be done before lightning and thunder strike down upon us, as St. Paul says. God has already made a beginning with the Pope, striking the Antichrist with the lightning of the Gospel, which is the Spirit of his mouth, which is now opened and speaks, and is still striking among the wicked; but I fear the teaching will not be followed by right living, until he will come and strike everything to the ground completely, making an end of ungodliness by the manifestation of his glorious coming, 2 Thessalonians 2:8.
24. Now since righteous works and living do not seem to follow the doctrine so perfectly among us as they indeed ought, I fear that our Lord God, unless the day of judgment should break in upon us, will not let his punishment be deferred; for our lives are not at all in agreement with the doctrine, not even in the least thing, as that we should serve our neighbor, which truly is not a great requirement. For there is no need to run to Rome nor to St. James, nor to give money or anything valuable to obtain it; all you need is to give your will to do it. But since we are such desperate people who, after having done only too much under the Pope, do nothing now so either the day of judgment must strike in our midst, or our Lord God will send heresies and then we will be compelled again to do unnecessary works. It is a matter of great concern to Christ, the Lord, that his Word should thus be despised and per secured; therefore those who are the cause of it will not go unpunished. Let this suffice concerning this text. [Let us pray to our Lord God to give us his grace, that we may so act and live as he has enabled us to speak and hear. Amen.]
↧
Religious family abandons US, gets lost at sea - Yahoo! News
Religious family abandons US, gets lost at sea - Yahoo! News:
"PHOENIX (AP) — A northern Arizona family that was lost at sea for weeks in an ill-fated attempt to leave the U.S. over what they consider government interference in religion will fly back home Sunday.
Hannah Gastonguay, 26, said Saturday that she and her husband "decided to take a leap of faith and see where God led us" when they took their two small children and her father-in-law and set sail from San Diego for the tiny island nation of Kiribati in May.
But just weeks into their journey"
'via Blog this'
↧
↧
WELS Stole St. John in Milwaukee and Then Closed It for Services. After 125 years, Bethlehem Lutheran Church holds last service. TLH Edited in Bethlehem Parsonage
After 125 years, Bethlehem Lutheran Church holds last service:
'via Blog this'
Michael Sears
Bethlehem Lutheran Church at 2466 W. McKinley Ave. in Milwaukee holds one of its final two services Sunday before it closes its doors. For more photos, go to jsonline.com/photos.
A 'heart-breaking' day for many members
Janet Engel knelt at the Communion rail at Bethlehem Lutheran Church on Sunday, tears welling in her eyes.
At 85, she'd built a lifetime of memories in this sacred space. She was confirmed here. She attended its grade school. Every Christmas, every Easter was celebrated in these pews.
And on Sunday, for the last time, Engel knelt to receive the Holy Eucharist here.
"It's heartbreaking," said Engel, who gathered with hundreds of current and former members for final services at Bethlehem, which closed its doors Sunday after 125 years.
"It's wonderful to see all of these people again," she said. "But closing the church — it's just heartbreaking."
Bethlehem Lutheran celebrated its final services Sunday, one a spartan farewell for current members who will never again worship as a family, the other a reunion that drew former congregants and clergy from across the state.
"It's been a long time since I've seen it this full," said an emotional Tyrone Dumas, his voice drowned by a choir suddenly swelled with alumni whose voices filled the church.
Bittersweet, the service echoed the themes of Ecclesiastes: that there is a time for everything, even death, but that God is eternal.
"No matter how sad it is to lose a church like this, the word of God will remain forever," said the Rev. Hunter Hofmann, one of the handful of clergy who spoke Sunday. "The building you worship in may close...but the church lives forever."
Changing community
Founded by German immigrants, Bethlehem and its towering steeple have stood at the corner of N. 24th Place and W. McKinley Ave. since 1888.
Part of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, Bethlehem thrived into the 1950s when as many as 1,800 people filled its pews. But it has struggled, like many urban churches, to hold onto its members. What began with the white flight of the 1960s was only exacerbated by the collapse of manufacturing in the central city, the recession and a growing trend in society away from organized religion, especially mainline Christian churches.
In recent years, membership had dwindled to about 150 people, many of them elderly and shut-ins, according to Pastor Micah Wildauer, who split his time between Bethlehem and nearby Hope Lutheran Church. Most Sundays, attendance hovered around 50.
Members' contributions could no longer cover the utilities and payroll, let alone the $500,000 that would be needed to fix the roof and make other repairs needed after years of deferred maintenance.
Plea for help
Leaders made an unprecedented plea for help to current and former members in 2009, and donations picked up. But it wasn't enough.
The church was preparing to close a few years ago when it received a miraculous reprieve: a $167,000 bequest from a longtime member.
"We gave about 10% to missions and used the rest to survive," said Dumas. It lasted almost three years, "but we knew when we got it that it would come to an end."
That end came Sunday in a flood of memories and long embraces as members welcomed back many they hadn't seen in years. Some walked through the building reminiscing; others snapped photographs. Many discussed where they would go next. Some plan to follow Wildauer to Hope Lutheran, but others are undecided.
"It really takes you back to your childhood," said Terry Bruss who continued to attend Bethlehem after moving to Cudahy.
"I met my wife here, so it's kind of nostalgic for me," said Dan Carow, 76, who lives about an hour north of Green Bay.
Committed congregation
"This is going to be one of the roughest days of my life," said Steve Phifer, who was baptized in the church and recently married there.
Phifer is deeply sentimental about Bethlehem, crediting the church and his mother with giving him a strong foundation in life. In recent years, Phifer maintained the church's boilers at no cost, and though he'd moved from the neighborhood, he returned regularly to mow grass and plow snow for two of his elderly teachers.
Like many, he's developed deep friendships here, across lines of race and age.
"Bethlehem is home to me," he said.
"The hardest thing will be not seeing the people we're used to seeing every week," said Esther Schedler, 97, who once taught at the school and still lives in the neighborhood.
"It's an emotional day," she said. "But we have to move on."
'via Blog this'
↧
Change or Die!!!!!Searching for Bonhoeffer - Mike Adams - Page 1
Searching for Bonhoeffer - Mike Adams - Page 1:
I predict that many of the mega-churches of today will be the shopping malls of tomorrow. When it is time to foreclose and go packing someone is going to have some heavy equipment to move. At least no one will have to pick up their cross.
'via Blog this'
As one who has traveled to twenty-two states this year I’ve had an opportunity to hear pastors in several of these mega-churches. And I’ve heard some very interesting things. Some examples follow:
I predict that many of the mega-churches of today will be the shopping malls of tomorrow. When it is time to foreclose and go packing someone is going to have some heavy equipment to move. At least no one will have to pick up their cross.
'via Blog this'
↧
Selections from Luther's Sermons for This Sunday. Mark 7:31-37
Here is the link. I will repeat it en clair, for Mequon graduates:
http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2013/08/luthers-sermons-on-twelfth-sunday-after.html
The quotations show the paragraph number and indicate whether it is the first or second sermon from the Lenker set.
7. You know the fundamental truth is, that man cannot be just and acceptable before God, save alone by faith. So that they have lied and spoken falsely who have taught heretofore that we may deal with God through our works. Moreover it was much more foolish that they taught us to rely upon the works and faith of other persons, pretending that nuns, monks and priests can help other persons by their wailing which they perform in their cloisters at night, and that in this manner they can help other people and distribute their treasures. Therefore, let everyone here remember, that no one dare undertake to be saved by the faith, or by the work of another person; in truth, it cannot be done by the faith or work of Mary, or of any saint, yea, not even by Christ’s work and faith, but through your own personal faith. For God will not permit Mary, or any other saint, not even Christ himself, to take your place, in order that you might be godly and righteous, unless you believe for your own self. If Christ’s faith and work will not do it, you will much less accomplish it by the work or faith of all the monks and priests. Hence our Gospel lesson gives us an occasion to speak of the faith of others.
(First Sermon, #7)
---
11. He addresses here particularly two organs of the body, the ear and the tongue; for you know the Kingdom of Christ is founded upon the Word, which cannot be apprehended or understood except by these two organs, the ear and the tongue, and he rules in the hearts of men alone by the Word and by faith. The ears apprehend the Word, the heart believes it; the tongue, however, speaks or confesses that which the heart believes. Hence, barring the tongue and ears, there is no perceptible difference between the Kingdom of Christ and that of the world.
12. For in regard to the outward life a Christian has duties like an unbeliever; he tills the ground, works his fields, and plows just like others, and he undertakes no peculiar work or deed, either in eating, drinking, working, sleeping, or anything else. But these two organs of the body make a difference between a Christian and an unbeliever; a Christian speaks and hears differently; he has a tongue which praises the grace of God and preaches Christ the Lord as being the only Savior, etc. This the world does not do; it speaks of avarice and other vices, preaches and praises its own glory.
13. In like manner the ears of both differ. A Christian’s ears have the same Word which the tongue preaches, and the heart believes; but the world prefers to hear one speak of her wisdom, understanding, honor and glory.
The ears and tongues of Christians are thus different from the ears and tongues of the world, or of unbelievers, caring nought for silver or gold, but only for that which is said of Christ, and how to speak and preach Christ.
(Second Sermon, #11-13)
↧
Herescope: The New Age Preacher and His Influence
Change or Die Jeske's disciple, Ski, was the subject of a meeting at The CORE on Tuesday. |
Herescope: The New Age Preacher and His Influence:
MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 2006
The New Age Preacher and His Influence
"Reverend Norman Vincent Peale is, to many, the most prophetic and moving New Age preacher of the twentieth century. He is also the founder of the self-help movement that formed the groundwork for the Church Growth Movement. Peale formed perhaps the most dramatic and meaningful link between religion and psychology of any religious leader in history. It is this same approachable, therapeutic brand of religion that many mega churches, including Saddleback, put forward today.…(George Mair, A Life With Purpose: Reverend Rick Warren: The Most Inspiring Pastor of Our Time [Berkley Books, 2005], p. 93-94)
Norman Vincent Peale's influence was like leaven permeating all of neoevangelicaldom. His influence carried far beyond Saddleback and is now being exported globally, not only by Rick Warren, but by another evangelical mega-leader -- Ken Blanchard -- who is connected to Rick Warren through their joint global leadership training initiatives.
Relevant to this discussion is the announcement that another important book has just been posted online! Warren Smith has recently updated each chapter in Reinventing Jesus Christ: The New Gospel. Many events have transpired since 2002 when Warren first wrote about New Age leaders like Neale Donald Walsch, Marianne Williamson and Oprah Winfrey and their striking similarities and interconnections with evangelical leaders.
A few years after writing Reinventing Jesus Christ, Warren Smith wrote Deceived on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose-Driven Church. In this best-selling book Smith contended that there were New Age implications to Rick Warren's Global P.E.A.C.E. Plan, and he particularly focused upon the influence of mega-church leader of the Crystal Cathedral, Rev. Robert Schuller.
In his new online version of Reinventing Jesus Christ and its chapter updates, Warren Smith puts forth exciting new material that is also relevant to Deceived on Purpose. Once again, Smith has noticed the profound influence of Robert Schuller on the thinking of Rick Warren. A fascinating Chapter 10 Update examines how Schuller's thinking was influenced by Norman Vincent Peale, and how Peale's thinking was influenced by the New Ager Florence Scovel Shinn.
On page 162 of A Time of Departing, Ray Yungen explains the important background information to this scenario. He noted that George Mair's book, A Life with Purpose, which was a "positive account" of Rick Warren's life, stated that:
"New Age prophet Norman Vincent Peale was at the foundation of the church-growth movement and furthermore 'many of Peale's uplifting affirmations originated with an "obscure teacher of occult science" named Florence Scovel Shinn.'"
Mair's book, on pages 91-100, does indeed give quite a bit of credit to Norman Vincent Peale, observing that Peale was the first mega-church pastor to bring in salesman techniques, a prosperity gospel, psychology and metaphysics. (Given this glowing description, it is no wonder that Mair's book created quite a stir among the Saddleback apologists when it first came out!)
The following material is excerpted with permission from the Chapter 10 Update of Warren Smith's newly-expanded Reinventing Jesus Christ: The New Gospel(Copyright 2006) posted atwww.reinventingjesuschrist.com:
______________________________________
Norman Vincent PealeSometime in March 2005, before all of Ken Blanchard’s New Age endorsements came to light, I received two articles from a pastor from Indianapolis, Indiana. One of the articles was a clipping from the August 3, 1995 Indianapolis Star. It had a big picture of Norman Vincent Peale and the headline read:
Norman Vincent Peale accused of plagiarism
‘Power of Positive Thinking’ author’s work similar to that of a little-known teacher of occult science.(88)
The article, published by Knight-Ridder Newspapers, asked the question: “Was the Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, father of the ‘believe and succeed’ theology sweeping American Protestantism, a plagiarist inspired by the occult?” In attempting to answer that question, the newspaper referred to an article from the Lutheran Quarterly that had contended that Norman Vincent Peale drew much of his inspiration from the writings and teachings of occult/New Age author Florence Scovel Shinn. Concerning the Lutheran Quarterly article, the Indianapolis paper stated:
After comparing his books to hers, the authors cite scores of specific instances in which Peale and Shinn not only think alike, but use similar or identical phrases.(89)
The newspaper article went on to say:
Shinn, who died in 1940, drew on mystical sources dating to the ancient Egyptian philosopher Hermes Trismegistus and the secrets of Freemasonry.
Such sources are progenitors of New Age, a movement considered ungodly hocus-pocus by conservative and fundamentalist Christians….
Shinn’s privately published metaphysical works, reissued by both Simon & Schuster and the Church of Religious Science, are available in New Age bookstores. Peale penned the introduction to the Simon & Schuster edition, indicating he had “long used” Shinn’s teachings.(90)
The Indiana pastor had included a copy of the Lutheran Quarterly article that the Indianapolis paper had referred to. The Lutheran Quarterly article exposed Peale’s unattributed use of Shinn’s occult/New Age teachings. The Peale/Shinn side by side quotes clearly demonstrated the similarity of their writings. The authors wrote:
THE STRIKING SIMILARITY between these passages discloses an unsettling theological secret. Along with many other parallel concepts, affirmations, metaphors, and stories, they provide testimony that the writing that made Norman Vincent Peale “minister to millions” and a millionaire many times over, shows a startling similarity to the writings of an obscure teacher of Occult science named Florence Scovel Shinn. Whatever may be the embarrassment caused by these striking similarities, it pales against the discomfiture that millions of mainline Christians, purporting to stand on orthodoxy and Scripture alone, have thus unwittingly embraced the Occult. So strong is its tacit foothold that it now may well be the primary working faith of many in the churches….(91)
The pastor told me that he was reminded of the Lutheran Quarterly article after reading my book, Deceived on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose-Driven Church. My observations concerning the New Age implications of Rick Warren taking unattributed material from Robert Schuller had reminded him of this article about Norman Vincent Peale taking unattributed material from Florence Scovel Shinn. The pastor pointed out that the New Age implications of Rick Warren’s teachings did not stop with his teacher Robert Schuller, or even to Schuller’s teacher, Norman Vincent Peale. It stretched back through all of them to the occult itself. A deeper look into Peale’s background confirmed that this 33rd degree Freemason had endorsed other New Age authors and teachers through the years.(92) Ironically, one of the New Age authors endorsed by Peale was Bernie Siegel – the same Bernie Siegel that Rick Warren had indiscriminately referred to in The Purpose-Driven Life. The Indiana pastor suggested that Norman Vincent Peale had popularized the occult within the mainstream Christian Church, and that these teachings may have been passed along to pastors like Robert Schuller and Rick Warren, who in turn passed them on to millions of others.
It is not surprising that New Age leader Neale Donald Walsch openly praises Norman Vincent Peale in much the same way as he did with Schuller. In discussing occult manifestation – how feelings inside of you can create events outside of you – Walsch states:
This phenomenon is discussed with extraordinary insight in the classic book The Power of Positive Thinking, written over fifty years ago by the Reverend Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, a Christian minister who understood that feelings are a gift from God, giving us the power of creation.(93)
When Ken Blanchard and Rick Warren co-led the 2003 Lead Like Jesus Conference in Alabama, Blanchard stated that Norman Vincent Peale had been one of the men responsible for bringing him into the faith.
And God started sending me this team, Bob Buford, Norman Vincent Peale, and [Bill] Hybels. All kinds of people started coming after me. I finally joined up in 1987-88 and turned my life over to the Lord…. I found out this is a really good deal.(94)
As a new Christian, Blanchard had co-authored The Power of Ethical Management with Peale, shortly after Peale had endorsed Bernie Siegel’s book Love, Medicine and Miracles. Incredibly, a website for Indian Guru Paramahansa Yogananda devotees stated that the Blanchard and Peale book had actually been “ghost-written” by Blanchard’s longtime New Age friend, Jim Ballard.(95) Blanchard’s Christian testimony We are the Beloved was also listed on this same website as having been “ghost-written” by Ballard. Because Ballard is a Yogananda devotee, and was being featured on the Yogananda website, it is presumed that the information was provided by Ballard himself. It would seem that Blanchard’s early relationship with Peale, as well as his thirty-year friendship with Ballard, may have helped to contribute to Blanchard’s serious lack of discernment still in evidence today.
Although Blanchard has been presented as naïve by many of his defenders – including Rick Warren – a closer examination of Blanchard’s past reveals a much different story.…
__________________________________________
A few years after writing Reinventing Jesus Christ, Warren Smith wrote Deceived on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose-Driven Church. In this best-selling book Smith contended that there were New Age implications to Rick Warren's Global P.E.A.C.E. Plan, and he particularly focused upon the influence of mega-church leader of the Crystal Cathedral, Rev. Robert Schuller.
In his new online version of Reinventing Jesus Christ and its chapter updates, Warren Smith puts forth exciting new material that is also relevant to Deceived on Purpose. Once again, Smith has noticed the profound influence of Robert Schuller on the thinking of Rick Warren. A fascinating Chapter 10 Update examines how Schuller's thinking was influenced by Norman Vincent Peale, and how Peale's thinking was influenced by the New Ager Florence Scovel Shinn.
On page 162 of A Time of Departing, Ray Yungen explains the important background information to this scenario. He noted that George Mair's book, A Life with Purpose, which was a "positive account" of Rick Warren's life, stated that:
"New Age prophet Norman Vincent Peale was at the foundation of the church-growth movement and furthermore 'many of Peale's uplifting affirmations originated with an "obscure teacher of occult science" named Florence Scovel Shinn.'"
Mair's book, on pages 91-100, does indeed give quite a bit of credit to Norman Vincent Peale, observing that Peale was the first mega-church pastor to bring in salesman techniques, a prosperity gospel, psychology and metaphysics. (Given this glowing description, it is no wonder that Mair's book created quite a stir among the Saddleback apologists when it first came out!)
The following material is excerpted with permission from the Chapter 10 Update of Warren Smith's newly-expanded Reinventing Jesus Christ: The New Gospel(Copyright 2006) posted atwww.reinventingjesuschrist.com:
______________________________________
Norman Vincent PealeSometime in March 2005, before all of Ken Blanchard’s New Age endorsements came to light, I received two articles from a pastor from Indianapolis, Indiana. One of the articles was a clipping from the August 3, 1995 Indianapolis Star. It had a big picture of Norman Vincent Peale and the headline read:
Norman Vincent Peale accused of plagiarism
‘Power of Positive Thinking’ author’s work similar to that of a little-known teacher of occult science.(88)
The article, published by Knight-Ridder Newspapers, asked the question: “Was the Rev. Norman Vincent Peale, father of the ‘believe and succeed’ theology sweeping American Protestantism, a plagiarist inspired by the occult?” In attempting to answer that question, the newspaper referred to an article from the Lutheran Quarterly that had contended that Norman Vincent Peale drew much of his inspiration from the writings and teachings of occult/New Age author Florence Scovel Shinn. Concerning the Lutheran Quarterly article, the Indianapolis paper stated:
After comparing his books to hers, the authors cite scores of specific instances in which Peale and Shinn not only think alike, but use similar or identical phrases.(89)
The newspaper article went on to say:
Shinn, who died in 1940, drew on mystical sources dating to the ancient Egyptian philosopher Hermes Trismegistus and the secrets of Freemasonry.
Such sources are progenitors of New Age, a movement considered ungodly hocus-pocus by conservative and fundamentalist Christians….
Shinn’s privately published metaphysical works, reissued by both Simon & Schuster and the Church of Religious Science, are available in New Age bookstores. Peale penned the introduction to the Simon & Schuster edition, indicating he had “long used” Shinn’s teachings.(90)
The Indiana pastor had included a copy of the Lutheran Quarterly article that the Indianapolis paper had referred to. The Lutheran Quarterly article exposed Peale’s unattributed use of Shinn’s occult/New Age teachings. The Peale/Shinn side by side quotes clearly demonstrated the similarity of their writings. The authors wrote:
THE STRIKING SIMILARITY between these passages discloses an unsettling theological secret. Along with many other parallel concepts, affirmations, metaphors, and stories, they provide testimony that the writing that made Norman Vincent Peale “minister to millions” and a millionaire many times over, shows a startling similarity to the writings of an obscure teacher of Occult science named Florence Scovel Shinn. Whatever may be the embarrassment caused by these striking similarities, it pales against the discomfiture that millions of mainline Christians, purporting to stand on orthodoxy and Scripture alone, have thus unwittingly embraced the Occult. So strong is its tacit foothold that it now may well be the primary working faith of many in the churches….(91)
The pastor told me that he was reminded of the Lutheran Quarterly article after reading my book, Deceived on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose-Driven Church. My observations concerning the New Age implications of Rick Warren taking unattributed material from Robert Schuller had reminded him of this article about Norman Vincent Peale taking unattributed material from Florence Scovel Shinn. The pastor pointed out that the New Age implications of Rick Warren’s teachings did not stop with his teacher Robert Schuller, or even to Schuller’s teacher, Norman Vincent Peale. It stretched back through all of them to the occult itself. A deeper look into Peale’s background confirmed that this 33rd degree Freemason had endorsed other New Age authors and teachers through the years.(92) Ironically, one of the New Age authors endorsed by Peale was Bernie Siegel – the same Bernie Siegel that Rick Warren had indiscriminately referred to in The Purpose-Driven Life. The Indiana pastor suggested that Norman Vincent Peale had popularized the occult within the mainstream Christian Church, and that these teachings may have been passed along to pastors like Robert Schuller and Rick Warren, who in turn passed them on to millions of others.
It is not surprising that New Age leader Neale Donald Walsch openly praises Norman Vincent Peale in much the same way as he did with Schuller. In discussing occult manifestation – how feelings inside of you can create events outside of you – Walsch states:
This phenomenon is discussed with extraordinary insight in the classic book The Power of Positive Thinking, written over fifty years ago by the Reverend Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, a Christian minister who understood that feelings are a gift from God, giving us the power of creation.(93)
When Ken Blanchard and Rick Warren co-led the 2003 Lead Like Jesus Conference in Alabama, Blanchard stated that Norman Vincent Peale had been one of the men responsible for bringing him into the faith.
And God started sending me this team, Bob Buford, Norman Vincent Peale, and [Bill] Hybels. All kinds of people started coming after me. I finally joined up in 1987-88 and turned my life over to the Lord…. I found out this is a really good deal.(94)
As a new Christian, Blanchard had co-authored The Power of Ethical Management with Peale, shortly after Peale had endorsed Bernie Siegel’s book Love, Medicine and Miracles. Incredibly, a website for Indian Guru Paramahansa Yogananda devotees stated that the Blanchard and Peale book had actually been “ghost-written” by Blanchard’s longtime New Age friend, Jim Ballard.(95) Blanchard’s Christian testimony We are the Beloved was also listed on this same website as having been “ghost-written” by Ballard. Because Ballard is a Yogananda devotee, and was being featured on the Yogananda website, it is presumed that the information was provided by Ballard himself. It would seem that Blanchard’s early relationship with Peale, as well as his thirty-year friendship with Ballard, may have helped to contribute to Blanchard’s serious lack of discernment still in evidence today.
Although Blanchard has been presented as naïve by many of his defenders – including Rick Warren – a closer examination of Blanchard’s past reveals a much different story.…
__________________________________________
To continue reading, see the new Updates athttp://www.reinventingjesuschrist.com. Particularly of relevance to the last full paragraph of today's post is the Chapter 5 Update which explains the significance of Jim Ballard.
The Truth:
"Woe be unto the Pastors who destroy and scatter the sheep of My pasture! saith the LORD." (Jeremiah 23:1)
'via Blog this'
↧
↧
The Chasm Between Faithful Biblical Teaching and the Synodical Conference
LCMS pastors continue to annoy me with their struggles to deal with tyrannical District Presidents, intent on working within a system that was broken at the start. What keeps them from starting independent congregations with their CRM (Canceled Removed Ministers) friends? Fear, timidity, caution, salary and benefits, worship of Holy Mother Abusive Sect.
The trouble with LCMS and its overt partners (WELS and ELS)* is the behavior of their founder Stephan and his acolyte Walther. Stephan insisted on total obedience, and Walther served as the enforcer who made sure the punishment of errant pastors took place. The clergy knew that Stephan was a notorious adulterer. The founder's reputation was so bad in Dresden that Sihler (later a Missouri leader) would not participate in any of the conventicles. * ELCA and Thrivent are covert partners in ministry, as their websty once stated.
And yet, we are supposed to believe that Loerber was shocked to learn of this adultery in America, so he rushed to tell bosom buddy Walther, who promptly organized a riot to rob, threaten, and kidnap Stephan. As Zion on the Mississippi points out, they were in America because of Stephan's adultery. Stephan was widely known as the adulterous pastor with financial shenanigans, under house arrest. They had plans for leaving Europe but those plans were activated by Stephan's arrest and court trial, where the two lawyers (Vehse and Marbach) represented His Holiness. In other words, all the clergy and the lawyers knew the scoop.
$10 used. Shame on you for not reading it, if you choose to defend the Great Walther. |
The Saxon Exit took place because their adulterous bishop no longer had a job in Dresden and no longer had a career in the church. So he packed up his girlfriends and followers, leaving his faithful wife behind, and set off for America. He let his syphilitic children die fatherless in Europe but took his healthy son. Whadda guy.
Walther's carefully organized riot got rid of the leader, seized 120 acres of land that belonged to Stephan, and removed the bishop's gold, books, and personal effects. That was mighty convenient for a bankrupt little group living on poor land picked out by their syphilitic bishop.
Walther trashed anyone who disagreed with him and took great pains to cover up his past, lie about Stephan, and alienate friendly Lutherans. Walther was his own enforcer, and he was just as tolerant of dissent as Stephan was. Question this? Abgeschnitten!
What happens today in the LCMS? There is a permanent hate campaign going on against Loehe, who was the real founder of Missouri. The Loehe congregations organized first and invited the Perryville sex cult to join them. The popular Missouri myth is that the Great Walther created the LCMS and felt himself compelled to perform an exorcism on Loehe.
Other exorcisms included the Ohio and Iowa Synods, plus anyone from the Muhlenberg tradition. They were Pietists! And what was Walther?
CFW attended Pietistic conventicles in college (his only degree) and joined Stephan's cell group ministry when the previous abusive cell group guru died. The Stephanites came over with cell groups because the bishop's congregation had special permission to sponsor conventicles on its property only, a provision constantly violated by Stephan.
Stephan took great pride in his cell group ministry, which has re-emerged in WELS and Missouri.
UOJ is the Stephan-Walther Heritage of Pietism
The UOJ claque slowly took over Missouri, WELS, and the Little Sect on the Prairie. The Loehe people knew better. Ludwig Fuerbringer, who served Frankenmuth (Loehe group), advocated constant study of Luther and the Biblical texts in Hebrew and Greek.
In contrast, his Uncle CFW urged his own expertise on everyone.
The Loehe catechism is all justification by faith. So is the Gausewitz. Missouri got rid of Loehe with its hate campaign, still being carried out feebly by Christian News, another UOJ union shop.
WELS got rid of Gausewitz by replacing him with Kuske's verbose UOJ textbook. Try to find anyone who remembers Gausewitz now. Jim Huebner, Fuller alumni (both natures, divine and human), has conveniently forgotten Gausewitz as the former pastor of his congregation.
UOJ Can Never Be Reconciled with JBFA
The UOJ clowns play a clever game, as long as we keep ourselves ignorant.
First they say there is no difference between UOJ and JBFA - just two sides of the same coin! I missed the coin analogy in the Bible - must be in Second Fritiof.
Second, the UOJ fanatics attack justification by faith at every turn. They never rest. I have never seen such whirling dervishes of cant, falsehood, and lawlessness. Nothing is too base, too disgusting for them. But they give themselves away by warning people away from Luther, away from precision translations of the Bible, away from the Biblical teaching of faith in Jesus.
Nothing makes them crazier in the head than teaching justification by faith and rejecting Universal Objective Justification. And yet, not justification by faith but their precious UOJ is suddenly the "Chief Article of the Christian Faith, the Master and Prince of all other articles." Nice shell game.
Under this shell is the Chief Article. Whoosh. It is UOJ! You thought it was justification by faith? You blasphemous heretic. You must be removed at once.
In short, the descendants of those people who stupidly followed Stephan and Walther are bowing to their tyrannical heirs.
↧
A Woman Takes the Lead in ELCA PB Race.Will WELS and LCMS Admit Their Partnership?
http://www.alpb.org/forum/index.php?topic=5144.msg312278;topicseen#msg312278
---
Elections in a closed group are always interesting; ecclesiastical ballots can be fascinating (especially to this LCMS observer, since we don't do that in our churchbody).
Looking at the vote totals from the first three ballots, it is noticeable how both Hanson and Crist fell from the 2nd ballot to the 3rd ballot:
Hanson: 440 369 271
Crist: 53 272 171
Eaton: 23 87 345
Svennungsen: 10 36 130
It looks like there had been some initial coalescing around Crist (+219), but then she lost ground(-101). Hanson has been losing votes on each ballot: (-71), then (-99). And as Pr. Johnson noted, the Eaton movement was nearly meteoric: (+64), then (+258).
Who knows how the Svennungsen voters will break? The trend for either Hanson or Crist would have to dramatically change for either of them to be elected.
Pr. Johnson and others present at the Assembly:
(a) Would it be possible to gauge the "mood" of the room both as the vote totals were announced and then during the time between sessions? (I'm curious if there is a palpable vibe of change, even if no one is agreed what the needed change is.)
(b) What is the required vote percentage for election on the 4th ballot?
Each will have five minutes.
Eaton: Bp. Svennungsen just said she'd like to have a beer with us, so I think we'll be leaving in a few minutes. . .
In 2009 we made a decision that was very difficult and costly. I think it was the right decision, but I don't think we've fully grieved it. I thank you for your faithfulness when so many decided they could not longer be part of this body. One of the collateral damages is that the hermeneutics of suspicion have infiltrated our church. We saw that in the discussion about folding ballots. Hanging chads has come into the church! My prayer is that we might grow to trust one another again, to see in one another a sinner for whom Christ died, redeemed. We need to start to trust each other. It's us, for heaven's sake, it's not the government! I want to make sure that those who believe that our decision in 2009 was not correct also have a voice and a place in this church. As immigrants we were insulated form the American religious experience; now we need to reclaim the Lutheran heritage of ambiguity as long as we agree on Christ crucified, that we are sinner and saint, set free to serve the neighbor. That is not the American Protestant message, but we need to reclaim it. In the end, all we have is Christ and Christ crucified.
Hanson: I'm often asked about favorite Bible story. I return to the night when Jesus appeared uninvited to the disciples behind locked doors, breathed on them the Holy Spirit, and then sent them back into the world that crucified Jesus. That's were we are--sent back into the world. Let's become more fluent in the language of faith with Carlos the pizza man and Mary Margaret at Starbucks [he mentioned them in the the Q & A, too]. Think about it: 25 years ago when this church was formed, we had not one global companion church, not one intercommunion partner, we didn't know about the internet. We haven't begun to imagine the possibilities that the Spirit is giving to us. Faith means sharing story of Jesus, but also fighting malaria, caring for creation, etc. Together we face the challenge: how will we prepare leaders that reflect the church God is calling us to become. Creating a climate of trust must be our priority. We are not a poor church; look at the leadership with which we are blessed, the power of the gospel. How about if we become the Evangelical Pentecostal Lutheran Church in America?
Svennungsen: When I visit congregations, I talk about the interdependence of the three expressions of the ELCA. Sometimes we have this corporate picture of the church. But if I am to believe the LIFT report, I must see that synod and churchwide are here to support the congregation, the place where the gospel actually meets people. What would it be like if we saw that throughout the church, and got rid of that organizational model altogether? I see this as a vocational discernment process. Why might I be called to lead this ecology of the church? I've had lots of experience leading congregations, ecumenical agencies, Fund for Theological Education, Texas Lutheran University, the synod. I lead by pulling together a team, one of my greatest strengths. I don't think there is a perfect leader. All the leaders before you today are extraordinary and faithful. How do we see ourselves building teams that complement and help us be effective? I also bring a life story shaped by a theology of the cross. I know loss. I'm a breast cancer survivor; I'm the parent of a down syndrome child who's now fighting leukemia. I trust in the theology of the cross; we learn, grow, God holds us and will never let us go.
Crist: Bp. Hanson spoke about being a Pentecost church. I'm in love with the Pentecost story of believers gathered together, beleaguered, and the storm coming in and transforming them. Suddenly new languages are coming out of their mouths. Outside was the world, the world which had not previously been inside, that did not previously understand the language the disciples spoke. But then they began to hear in their own languages. We are gathered here and we have our language, our procedure; but we are empowered through our baptism, by water and the Holy Spirit, to go out to "the other" in our society and speak in the language of "the other"--to reach out, be vulnerable, take the risk to speak to "the other." Who would that be for us? It is different in every context. Where I live, the other in part is the Native people who have lived there for thousands of years and whom we are not engaging through a Lutheran apology. It's all the unchurched "spiritual but not religious." Who is it where you live? You are empowered by the Holy Spirit to go out and listen, learn the language of the other so that the good news may be proclaimed in Jesus' name.
The assembly sang "Beautiful Savior." Then VP Pena explained the voting procedure (being done by machine). After prayer, the assembly voted. The results:
Total ballots: 919 Necessary for election (2/3): 613
Eaton 345
Hanson 271
Crist 171
Svennungsen 130
Marty 1
Lundblad 0
Lose 0
Top three proceed to next ballot. That will happen this afternoon, after further Q&A.
Observations: This is an interesting turn of events. The top three stayed the same (Svennungsen just didn't rise, and to some was viewed as just another church bureaucrat). But Eaton catapulted, and quite dramatically, from third place to first. My sense is that she came off as the most serious and thoughtful--the one who was substantive, aware of the lack of trust across the church, the one who didn't tell compelling and sympathy-engendering personal anecdotes. Unless things change dramatically over the next few hours, she seems likely to be our next presiding bishop.
Interesting to note that now all three top candidates are graduates of non-Lutheran divinity schools. This would not in itself be a terrible thing, except that two of them are Harvard. (roj, MDiv Yale '75)
Pena proceeded to explain the common ballot (that's voting for all the non-officer positions--church council, board members, etc.). The ballot is due later today.
Memorials committee was then called up; chair explained their work.
Eaton: Bp. Svennungsen just said she'd like to have a beer with us, so I think we'll be leaving in a few minutes. . .
In 2009 we made a decision that was very difficult and costly. I think it was the right decision, but I don't think we've fully grieved it. I thank you for your faithfulness when so many decided they could not longer be part of this body. One of the collateral damages is that the hermeneutics of suspicion have infiltrated our church. We saw that in the discussion about folding ballots. Hanging chads has come into the church! My prayer is that we might grow to trust one another again, to see in one another a sinner for whom Christ died, redeemed. We need to start to trust each other. It's us, for heaven's sake, it's not the government! I want to make sure that those who believe that our decision in 2009 was not correct also have a voice and a place in this church. As immigrants we were insulated form the American religious experience; now we need to reclaim the Lutheran heritage of ambiguity as long as we agree on Christ crucified, that we are sinner and saint, set free to serve the neighbor. That is not the American Protestant message, but we need to reclaim it. In the end, all we have is Christ and Christ crucified.
Hanson: I'm often asked about favorite Bible story. I return to the night when Jesus appeared uninvited to the disciples behind locked doors, breathed on them the Holy Spirit, and then sent them back into the world that crucified Jesus. That's were we are--sent back into the world. Let's become more fluent in the language of faith with Carlos the pizza man and Mary Margaret at Starbucks [he mentioned them in the the Q & A, too]. Think about it: 25 years ago when this church was formed, we had not one global companion church, not one intercommunion partner, we didn't know about the internet. We haven't begun to imagine the possibilities that the Spirit is giving to us. Faith means sharing story of Jesus, but also fighting malaria, caring for creation, etc. Together we face the challenge: how will we prepare leaders that reflect the church God is calling us to become. Creating a climate of trust must be our priority. We are not a poor church; look at the leadership with which we are blessed, the power of the gospel. How about if we become the Evangelical Pentecostal Lutheran Church in America?
Svennungsen: When I visit congregations, I talk about the interdependence of the three expressions of the ELCA. Sometimes we have this corporate picture of the church. But if I am to believe the LIFT report, I must see that synod and churchwide are here to support the congregation, the place where the gospel actually meets people. What would it be like if we saw that throughout the church, and got rid of that organizational model altogether? I see this as a vocational discernment process. Why might I be called to lead this ecology of the church? I've had lots of experience leading congregations, ecumenical agencies, Fund for Theological Education, Texas Lutheran University, the synod. I lead by pulling together a team, one of my greatest strengths. I don't think there is a perfect leader. All the leaders before you today are extraordinary and faithful. How do we see ourselves building teams that complement and help us be effective? I also bring a life story shaped by a theology of the cross. I know loss. I'm a breast cancer survivor; I'm the parent of a down syndrome child who's now fighting leukemia. I trust in the theology of the cross; we learn, grow, God holds us and will never let us go.
Crist: Bp. Hanson spoke about being a Pentecost church. I'm in love with the Pentecost story of believers gathered together, beleaguered, and the storm coming in and transforming them. Suddenly new languages are coming out of their mouths. Outside was the world, the world which had not previously been inside, that did not previously understand the language the disciples spoke. But then they began to hear in their own languages. We are gathered here and we have our language, our procedure; but we are empowered through our baptism, by water and the Holy Spirit, to go out to "the other" in our society and speak in the language of "the other"--to reach out, be vulnerable, take the risk to speak to "the other." Who would that be for us? It is different in every context. Where I live, the other in part is the Native people who have lived there for thousands of years and whom we are not engaging through a Lutheran apology. It's all the unchurched "spiritual but not religious." Who is it where you live? You are empowered by the Holy Spirit to go out and listen, learn the language of the other so that the good news may be proclaimed in Jesus' name.
The assembly sang "Beautiful Savior." Then VP Pena explained the voting procedure (being done by machine). After prayer, the assembly voted. The results:
Total ballots: 919 Necessary for election (2/3): 613
Eaton 345
Hanson 271
Crist 171
Svennungsen 130
Marty 1
Lundblad 0
Lose 0
Top three proceed to next ballot. That will happen this afternoon, after further Q&A.
Observations: This is an interesting turn of events. The top three stayed the same (Svennungsen just didn't rise, and to some was viewed as just another church bureaucrat). But Eaton catapulted, and quite dramatically, from third place to first. My sense is that she came off as the most serious and thoughtful--the one who was substantive, aware of the lack of trust across the church, the one who didn't tell compelling and sympathy-engendering personal anecdotes. Unless things change dramatically over the next few hours, she seems likely to be our next presiding bishop.
Interesting to note that now all three top candidates are graduates of non-Lutheran divinity schools. This would not in itself be a terrible thing, except that two of them are Harvard. (roj, MDiv Yale '75)
Pena proceeded to explain the common ballot (that's voting for all the non-officer positions--church council, board members, etc.). The ballot is due later today.
Memorials committee was then called up; chair explained their work.
---
Elections in a closed group are always interesting; ecclesiastical ballots can be fascinating (especially to this LCMS observer, since we don't do that in our churchbody).
Looking at the vote totals from the first three ballots, it is noticeable how both Hanson and Crist fell from the 2nd ballot to the 3rd ballot:
Hanson: 440 369 271
Crist: 53 272 171
Eaton: 23 87 345
Svennungsen: 10 36 130
It looks like there had been some initial coalescing around Crist (+219), but then she lost ground(-101). Hanson has been losing votes on each ballot: (-71), then (-99). And as Pr. Johnson noted, the Eaton movement was nearly meteoric: (+64), then (+258).
Who knows how the Svennungsen voters will break? The trend for either Hanson or Crist would have to dramatically change for either of them to be elected.
Pr. Johnson and others present at the Assembly:
(a) Would it be possible to gauge the "mood" of the room both as the vote totals were announced and then during the time between sessions? (I'm curious if there is a palpable vibe of change, even if no one is agreed what the needed change is.)
(b) What is the required vote percentage for election on the 4th ballot?
↧
Nine Women Bishops of ELCA
From left to right: Bp. Wilma Kucharek, Bp Marie Jerge, Bp Ann Svennungsen, Bp Jessica Crist -Chair of the Conference of Bishops, Bp Suzanne Dillahunt, Bp Shelly Wickstrom, Bp Elizabeth Eaton, Bp Tracie Bartholomew Bp Claire Burkat — with Wilma Kucharek, Marie Jerge,Ann Svennungsen, Jessica Crist, Szanne Dillahunt,Shelly Wickstrom, Elizabeth Eaton, Tracie Bartholomewand Claire Burkat.
https://www.facebook.com/Lutherans
↧
Fab Four - Finalists for Captain of the ELCA-tanic
↧
↧
Eaton and Hanson Duke It Out in the Fourth Ballot.ELCA Presiding Bishop
Mark Hanson and E. Eaton share the top two votes, but Eaton is ahead by about 250 votes.
These are the answers to the written questions from the remaining three:
What gifts do you believe you would bring?
Eaton: 25 years of parish ministry, love for the church, appreciation of Lutheran theology, knowledge and commitment to the greater church, focus on mission, 6 years a synodical bishop, eagerness to serve.
Hanson: A passion to proclaim and serve the Gospel, a love for and joy in ministry, one who inspires others to have confidence in God's grace, interpretor of the Christian faith in a diverse, ever-changing world, a commitment to build relationships--from local communities to global and ecumenical partners, strategic thinker and collaborator, communicator, critical thinker
Crist:As a synod bishop, I have close connection with congregations on the ground, and with the ministries of the wider church. My job is to make the connections and to open up the doors of communication. I have led a synod through some disruption and grief following the 2009 decisions, and I have seen the pain all around. This experience, which I wouldn't wish on anyone, is a gift I bring to the office. It has taught me patience and empathy. Having grown up and served in the eastern part of the church, and having served in the west, I have a sense of the church on the edges, where we are going in the future. And I also have experience with thge heartland, as well as companion synods in Bolivia and South Africa. I am thoroughly Lutheran, thoroughly ecumenical. I have a passion for justice, and a tract record connecting with social issues in our synod. I take seriously the Pentecost story, and I work hard at translating our incredible story into the language of our neighbors.
What is your concept of the primary role of PB?
Eaton: We are a diverse, a pixelated church. We often forget that in baptism we have been incorporated into the body of Christ and are members one of another. The PB can be a powerful and living symbol of our connectedness to each other, and as church together, our connectedness to Christ.
Hanson: Preach the Gospel and celebrate the sacraments as the central act of missional leadership. Call us to be a sent church with high confidence in the Holy Spirit's power to bring renewal in our lives of faith and the ministries of the congregations. Convene us so that with evangelical imagination we might be part of God's mission of reconciliation in our fragmented and fearful world. In all things give thanks to God for God's amazing grace in Christ.
Crist: The PB, whose responsibilities are outlined in the Constitution and Bylaws, is the chief pastor and public face of the ELCA both internally and externally. Preaching and teaching are critical components of the role, interpreting the faith and the work of the church. The PB serves the church in an increasingly complex world, and cannot be all things to all people. But she or he is first and foremost a baptized child of God, and a witness to the love of God through Jesus Christ. In consultation wit the church council and conference of bishops, the PB sets a vision for the church and works to find the most effective ways to implement that vision. The PB, along with staff, oversees the operations of the churchwide organization, and seeks to carry out the direction fo the churchwide assembly, with the guidance and help of the Holy Spirit.
What is the key skill required of a leader in the church?
Eaton: On the wall outside of my office door in my former parish hung the portraits of the pastors who served the congregation. I always noticed that there was plenty of room on that wall for more portraits. There would always be someone succeeding me. A leader in the church needs to hold his or her call lightly. Hold it too tightly and it becomes impossible to serve freely.
Hanson: The ability to hold diverse people, viewpoints, experiences, and cultures in the ELCA with care, respect and wisdom always in the context of our unity in Christ. To accomplish this, the leader will need to be an attentive listener, grounded in the Gospel, actively participating in conversations while sharing a vision for God's mission.
Crist: A good leader listens and love. We are a church blessed with great leaders. A leader in the church needs to communicate effectively in speech and in writing. Good communication involves listening--to the shouts and the cries, to the still small voices, and to the silences. It takes discernment, both communal and personal. And it takes an ability to translate words and concepts from church-speak into the language of the pew and of the streets.
How do you practice care for others and yourself?
Eaton: My family and staff help to keep me honest. I meet regularly with a spiritual director. I try to spend twenty minutes a day in silence and prayer--some days I am conscientious about this, some days less so. I enjoy physical activity and challenges. I stress to my staff that family comes first and that it does not advance the ministry to be utterly used up by work. I laugh a lot.
Hanson: In our home congregation we are nourished in a community of worship and prayer. With Ione, we continue to make our marriage, our six children and five grandchildren the primary relationships in our life. Ione and I delight in being able to travel together and experience the hospitality of people throughout the ELCA. Self-care includes disciplines of individual and corporate prayer, walking, and riding my Honda scooter. I relax most by reading and listening to classical music, especially Rachmaninoff's Vespers. The blues bring joy to my life.
Crist: I care for others with prayer, pastoral care and enouragement. I listen, I emphathize, I connect. Care is not only the work I am called to do as bishop, it is a basic commandment of our faith. For myself, I have a very supportive family, colleagues and friends. I pray. I exercise. I have a mutual ministry counselor, and a book group.
What gifts do you believe you would bring?
Eaton: 25 years of parish ministry, love for the church, appreciation of Lutheran theology, knowledge and commitment to the greater church, focus on mission, 6 years a synodical bishop, eagerness to serve.
Hanson: A passion to proclaim and serve the Gospel, a love for and joy in ministry, one who inspires others to have confidence in God's grace, interpretor of the Christian faith in a diverse, ever-changing world, a commitment to build relationships--from local communities to global and ecumenical partners, strategic thinker and collaborator, communicator, critical thinker
Crist:As a synod bishop, I have close connection with congregations on the ground, and with the ministries of the wider church. My job is to make the connections and to open up the doors of communication. I have led a synod through some disruption and grief following the 2009 decisions, and I have seen the pain all around. This experience, which I wouldn't wish on anyone, is a gift I bring to the office. It has taught me patience and empathy. Having grown up and served in the eastern part of the church, and having served in the west, I have a sense of the church on the edges, where we are going in the future. And I also have experience with thge heartland, as well as companion synods in Bolivia and South Africa. I am thoroughly Lutheran, thoroughly ecumenical. I have a passion for justice, and a tract record connecting with social issues in our synod. I take seriously the Pentecost story, and I work hard at translating our incredible story into the language of our neighbors.
What is your concept of the primary role of PB?
Eaton: We are a diverse, a pixelated church. We often forget that in baptism we have been incorporated into the body of Christ and are members one of another. The PB can be a powerful and living symbol of our connectedness to each other, and as church together, our connectedness to Christ.
Hanson: Preach the Gospel and celebrate the sacraments as the central act of missional leadership. Call us to be a sent church with high confidence in the Holy Spirit's power to bring renewal in our lives of faith and the ministries of the congregations. Convene us so that with evangelical imagination we might be part of God's mission of reconciliation in our fragmented and fearful world. In all things give thanks to God for God's amazing grace in Christ.
Crist: The PB, whose responsibilities are outlined in the Constitution and Bylaws, is the chief pastor and public face of the ELCA both internally and externally. Preaching and teaching are critical components of the role, interpreting the faith and the work of the church. The PB serves the church in an increasingly complex world, and cannot be all things to all people. But she or he is first and foremost a baptized child of God, and a witness to the love of God through Jesus Christ. In consultation wit the church council and conference of bishops, the PB sets a vision for the church and works to find the most effective ways to implement that vision. The PB, along with staff, oversees the operations of the churchwide organization, and seeks to carry out the direction fo the churchwide assembly, with the guidance and help of the Holy Spirit.
What is the key skill required of a leader in the church?
Eaton: On the wall outside of my office door in my former parish hung the portraits of the pastors who served the congregation. I always noticed that there was plenty of room on that wall for more portraits. There would always be someone succeeding me. A leader in the church needs to hold his or her call lightly. Hold it too tightly and it becomes impossible to serve freely.
Hanson: The ability to hold diverse people, viewpoints, experiences, and cultures in the ELCA with care, respect and wisdom always in the context of our unity in Christ. To accomplish this, the leader will need to be an attentive listener, grounded in the Gospel, actively participating in conversations while sharing a vision for God's mission.
Crist: A good leader listens and love. We are a church blessed with great leaders. A leader in the church needs to communicate effectively in speech and in writing. Good communication involves listening--to the shouts and the cries, to the still small voices, and to the silences. It takes discernment, both communal and personal. And it takes an ability to translate words and concepts from church-speak into the language of the pew and of the streets.
How do you practice care for others and yourself?
Eaton: My family and staff help to keep me honest. I meet regularly with a spiritual director. I try to spend twenty minutes a day in silence and prayer--some days I am conscientious about this, some days less so. I enjoy physical activity and challenges. I stress to my staff that family comes first and that it does not advance the ministry to be utterly used up by work. I laugh a lot.
Hanson: In our home congregation we are nourished in a community of worship and prayer. With Ione, we continue to make our marriage, our six children and five grandchildren the primary relationships in our life. Ione and I delight in being able to travel together and experience the hospitality of people throughout the ELCA. Self-care includes disciplines of individual and corporate prayer, walking, and riding my Honda scooter. I relax most by reading and listening to classical music, especially Rachmaninoff's Vespers. The blues bring joy to my life.
Crist: I care for others with prayer, pastoral care and enouragement. I listen, I emphathize, I connect. Care is not only the work I am called to do as bishop, it is a basic commandment of our faith. For myself, I have a very supportive family, colleagues and friends. I pray. I exercise. I have a mutual ministry counselor, and a book group.
Hanson sounds like too much on an insider, using a lot of buzzwords and well-worn phrases, while Crist seems a tad too eager like a politician who can't stop talking even after the point is made. Eaton wins by simply answering the questions as though she honestly has something to say on the subject.
Too many "I"s in Crists responses.
↧
ELCA Elects First Woman Presiding Bishop.What Now, LCMS and WELS?
When she became bishop in 2006:
ELCA NEWS SERVICE
December 4, 2006
December 4, 2006
Elizabeth Eaton Elected Bishop of ELCA Northeastern Ohio Synod
06-190-JB
06-190-JB
CHICAGO (ELCA) -- Voting members attending a special synod assembly Dec. 2 elected the Rev. Elizabeth A. Eaton, Messiah Lutheran Church, Ashtabula, Ohio, to a six-year term as bishop of the Northeastern Ohio Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA).
Eaton was elected on the fifth ballot for bishop, 281-230 over the Rev. David P. Anderson, St. Matthew Lutheran Church, Medina, Ohio. On the fourth ballot for bishop, Eaton led with 233 votes, Anderson had 178, and the Rev. Jerome E. Burce, Messiah Lutheran Church, Fairview Park, Ohio, was third with 124 votes.
There were 41 names on the nominating ballot for bishop. The Rev. Lowell G. Almen, ELCA secretary, chaired the election.
Eaton, 51, will succeed the Rev. Marcus J. Miller, who resigned Aug. 1 to accept a call as president of the Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, S.C. The Rev. Lee M. Miller, former bishop of the ELCA Upstate New York Synod, has been serving as interim bishop since Marcus Miller's departure. Lee Miller will remain in that role until January 31, 2007.
Eaton will assume her new role as bishop on Feb. 1, 2007. She will be installed Feb. 3, 2007, at 2 p.m. at St. Paul Episcopal Church, Akron, Ohio. The Rev. Mark S. Hanson, ELCA presiding bishop, will preside over the installation.
Eaton was elected in 2005 to the ELCA Church Council, which serves as the board of directors and the legislative authority of the church between churchwide assemblies. She was a voting member at three ELCA Churchwide Assemblies, and she has served on the Northeastern Ohio Synod council and its executive committee. In 1984 she was a delegate to the Lutheran World Federation assembly in Budapest, Hungary.
Eaton was born in Cleveland, Ohio. In 1977 she earned a bachelor's degree in music education from The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio. She earned a master of divinity degree in 1980 from Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, Mass.
Following ordination in 1981 Eaton served as assistant pastor for All Saints Lutheran Church, Worthington, Ohio, then as an interim pastor for Good Hope Lutheran Church, Youngstown, Ohio. She became pastor at Messiah Lutheran Church in 1991.
Eaton is married to the Rev. Conrad Selnick, an Episcopal priest serving St. Christopher's by-the-River, Gates Mills, Ohio. They are parents of two daughters, Rebeckah and Susannah.
The ELCA Northeastern Ohio Synod has 84,388 baptized members in 207 congregations. The synod office is located in Cuyahoga Falls.
Eaton was elected on the fifth ballot for bishop, 281-230 over the Rev. David P. Anderson, St. Matthew Lutheran Church, Medina, Ohio. On the fourth ballot for bishop, Eaton led with 233 votes, Anderson had 178, and the Rev. Jerome E. Burce, Messiah Lutheran Church, Fairview Park, Ohio, was third with 124 votes.
There were 41 names on the nominating ballot for bishop. The Rev. Lowell G. Almen, ELCA secretary, chaired the election.
Eaton, 51, will succeed the Rev. Marcus J. Miller, who resigned Aug. 1 to accept a call as president of the Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, S.C. The Rev. Lee M. Miller, former bishop of the ELCA Upstate New York Synod, has been serving as interim bishop since Marcus Miller's departure. Lee Miller will remain in that role until January 31, 2007.
Eaton will assume her new role as bishop on Feb. 1, 2007. She will be installed Feb. 3, 2007, at 2 p.m. at St. Paul Episcopal Church, Akron, Ohio. The Rev. Mark S. Hanson, ELCA presiding bishop, will preside over the installation.
Eaton was elected in 2005 to the ELCA Church Council, which serves as the board of directors and the legislative authority of the church between churchwide assemblies. She was a voting member at three ELCA Churchwide Assemblies, and she has served on the Northeastern Ohio Synod council and its executive committee. In 1984 she was a delegate to the Lutheran World Federation assembly in Budapest, Hungary.
Eaton was born in Cleveland, Ohio. In 1977 she earned a bachelor's degree in music education from The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio. She earned a master of divinity degree in 1980 from Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, Mass.
Following ordination in 1981 Eaton served as assistant pastor for All Saints Lutheran Church, Worthington, Ohio, then as an interim pastor for Good Hope Lutheran Church, Youngstown, Ohio. She became pastor at Messiah Lutheran Church in 1991.
Eaton is married to the Rev. Conrad Selnick, an Episcopal priest serving St. Christopher's by-the-River, Gates Mills, Ohio. They are parents of two daughters, Rebeckah and Susannah.
The ELCA Northeastern Ohio Synod has 84,388 baptized members in 207 congregations. The synod office is located in Cuyahoga Falls.
---
http://www.elca.org/Who-We-Are/Our-Three-Expressions/Faithful-Mission/Being-Faithful/Voices.aspx
Listening to Faithful Voices
I can no longer condemn or hate other Christians for whom I pray.
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together
Lutheran theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote in his 1938 masterpiece, Life Together, "A Christian community either lives by the intercessory prayers of its members for one another, or the community will be destroyed. I can no longer condemn or hate other Christians for whom I pray."
Here are voices from leaders and members of this church who are defining what it means to be faithful in these times:
The Rev. Lowell Erdahl, former bishop of ELCA Saint Paul Area Synod, said:
"I regret my previous blindness and the harm I have caused. I'm grateful that the ELCA has opened the door to the blessing of committed same-sex relationships and to the ministry of people in such relationships. I continue to pray and work for their full inclusion in church and society, including their right to civil marriage.
"It will be a great day when homosexual humanity is as clearly understood and as fully affirmed as Copernican astronomy is today."
"It will be a great day when homosexual humanity is as clearly understood and as fully affirmed as Copernican astronomy is today."
The Rev. Ron Bock, St. John Lutheran, Fargo, N.D., said:
"At the end of the day we go home knowing that we are accepted as a child of God. The issue of sexuality has less importance. I believe for this church than it does for others churches in the Fargo-Moorhead area. I'm proud of this congregation. I'm proud of these people for being willing to deal with hard issues even if they don't agree and then come sit next to each other in the pew that's what it's about."
The Rev. Paul Wayne Meier, St. Matthew on the Lake Lutheran Church, Benton, Ky., wrote:
"Of the $18,000 my congregation sent to the Indiana-Kentucky Synod for benevolence in 2008, we know it sent $9,000 to the churchwide organization. Of that amount $8,960 supported missionaries, new congregations, seminaries, campus ministries, social ministry organizations, etc. Less than $40 of our $9,000 helped with the development of social statements (and no dollars for the sexuality study, which was funded by previous years’ surpluses). So to make a statement in principle concerning the 'right thinking and policies' of the church by withholding money makes a far greater impact on the poor, the hungry, future pastors and college students than it could ever make on the social resolutions of this body of Christ."
Dr. David Yeago, Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, wrote:
"Here is my dream for the future of traditional Christians in the ELCA. Instead of thinking of ourselves primarily as dissenters and opposition, let us ask God to make of us a movement of repentance and renewal, so that the continuing presence of traditionalists in the ELCA will be a blessing and an adornment for the whole church."
The Rev. Terri Stagner-Collier, ELCA Southeastern Synod, wrote:
"I now join the ranks of the many pastors and lay people who disagree with this action, asking the resulting question: 'Now what?'
"I write today as a parish pastor and as secretary of the synod to reflect on possible responses to the 'now what' question. If you feel a need to 'do something' about this, please consider the long-term impact of what you do. Will your actions divide our church or could they preserve our unity in Christ and continue the ministry we share."
Bishop Jessica Crist, ELCA Montana Synod, wrote:
"Many of you are aware that even within our [synod] staff there is not unaminity of opinion. We represent the diversity that is in the church, and that is intentional. And we intend to continue to work together for the good of the Church. We are committed to maintaining the unity of the Body of Christ. I have always said that there is room in the church, room in this synod for a diversity of opinion on social and political issues. And I have also said that congregations and pastors will not be forced to do something they cannot, in good conscience, do."
Bishop Lawrence Wohlrabe, ELCA Northwestern Minnesota Synod, wrote:
"Let us all ask God to walk with our church as we ponder and live into the implications of these actions of our Churchwide Assembly. Although, like many of you, I was not in favor of changing our ministry policies, I am willing to abide by the decisions of the Churchwide Assembly and to continue to lead our synod forward into God’s future. God is with us, and God will see us through this chapter in our life together. Thank you, as always, for your partnership in the gospel and in the great mission to which God has called us -- to make Christ known in a world hungry for good news."
Linda Rattle, member of Lutheran Church of the Redeemer, Racine, wrote:
"What a blessing this experience [at the 2009 Churchwide Assembly] has been to me. It has certainly changed my life. I have wept this week, laughed this week, strangers became friends and my relationship to God became stronger. I so love this church and each and every member. The respect and dignity shown throughout the week was unbelievable. The concern and love for fellow members was so apparent. We are all brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus, united as one to do His work. . . God’s work. Our hands."
The Rev. Mike Poole Jr., voting member from the ELCA Southern Ohio Synod wrote:
"I am a called and ordained minister of Christ's Church. The accountability of my witness is not how I do when things are good, and things are easy, and things are warm and fuzzy. The accountability of my witness is how I do when things are not good, when things are divided, when things are at their most difficult, when things are hard and jagged. That will be the accountability of my witness. I have been called to humbly and faithfully serve in such a time as this. What will my witness be? I hope God hears that I was a humble and faithful servant. I hope God hears that I was a leader in a time when the Church needs leaders to lead. I hope God hears that I did the best I had, for this poor broken sinner, in a broken world. I hope God hears my witness. And not from me. But from the world, and from you."
Bishop Elizabeth Eaton, ELCA Northeastern Ohio Synod, wrote:
"I strongly encourage all of us to take a breathing period during which members and congregations take no action to leave the ELCA. And, while we are breathing, let’s call upon the breath of the Spirit to enable us to listen to each other, bear one another’s burdens, and pray (sometimes with sighs too deep for words).
"In the meantime let us commit to pray for one another and for the ELCA, let us engage more fully in Bible study and the Book of Faith initiative, let us 'not grow weary in well-doing' as we serve the hungry, the homeless and the stranger and let us meet together at the cross our true source of life."
↧
Rev. Elizabeth Eaton, First Female Lutheran Bishop (ELCA) Elected
Rev. Elizabeth Eaton, First Female Lutheran Bishop (ELCA) Elected:
'via Blog this'
(RNS) The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America on Wednesday (Aug. 14) elected the Rev. Elizabeth Eaton as the denomination’s first female presiding bishop. Eaton received 600 votes against incumbent Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson, who received 287.
Eaton, the current ELCA bishop of Cleveland, is married to the Rev. Conrad Selnick, an Episcopal priest. Like Hanson, she is considered a moderate who supported the denomination’s decision to allow partnered gay clergy while allowing room for churches to disagree, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
A native of Cleveland, she received a master of divinity degree from Harvard Divinity School.
“We are a church that is overwhelmingly European in a culture that is increasingly pluralistic,” Eaton told the ELCA Churchwide Assembly in Pittsburgh shortly after the election.
“We need to welcome the gifts of those who come from different places, that is a conversation we need to have as a church.”
The ELCA, which has lost members nearly every year since its founding in 1987, experienced a dramatic drop when it lost nearly half a million members in 2010 and 2011.
Hanson is credited with leading the nation’s largest Lutheran body — with more than 4 million members in 9,638 congregations — with a steady hand during turbulent times as the ELCA wrestled with the gay policy that Hanson favored but was hesitant to push on the larger church.
Even so, under his watch the Chicago-based ELCA saw a small but significant schism as conservatives upset with the decision to allow gay clergy defected to a new rival denomination, the North American Lutheran Church.
The election was a surprise to many, as Hanson was expected to win an unprecedented third term after 12 years in office. Hanson was the third presiding bishop in the denomination’s history; three of four finalists for the position were women.
“When I stood before you 12 years ago, I told you this is not an election won, this is a call received. And now this call has been extended to Bishop Eaton,” Hanson said at the assembly. “This is a humble and a holy privilege to serve the gospel as the pastor of this whole church.”
In June, Lutherans in Los Angeles elected the ELCA’s first openly gay bishop, four years after the denomination voted to allow openly gay men and lesbians to serve as clergy.
Eaton joins Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, who in 2006 became the first woman to lead a church in the worldwide Anglican Communion. The two churches share a full communion agreement that allows shared clergy and joint ministry.
Eaton will serve a six-year term beginning Nov. 1.
'via Blog this'
↧
http://bible-researcher.com/csb.html
More on this issue here: http://bible-researcher.com/gal6-16.html
But if WELS will allow the NIV 2011, then I guess it is no surprise that the HCSB would be allowed as well.
For the record, I'm LCMS, so I'm an outside observer to all this. I'm not trying to put down WELS though. We in the LCMS have just as much of a problem with Enthusiasts in our own Synod.
Thank you for posting this. I was unable to find it elsewhere.
Vernon
Pastor Paul Rydecki was excommunicated from the WELS in 2012 for publicly teaching that men are justified, forgiven all sin, solely by the gracious gift of faith in Christ alone. The WELS' synod president, COP, members of the TEC, Seminary faculty, College faculty, High School and Grade School faculties and the majority of called workers and clergy applauded his excommunication for teaching a Gospel that was officially labeled heresy. Many others condoned the action by silently watching it happen in the Lutheran church and continue to allow the excommunication to stand.
All of that was done at the time when the official Bible translation of the WELS, the NIV84, condemned such action and charge of heresy as contrary to Scripture, Christ, God the Father and the Holy Ghost.
This is also not the first time the WELS has excommunicated individuals from fellowship over teaching Scriptural justification solely by faith alone - the Kokomo families were excommunicated for the same doctrine years ago. The Krohn family was removed from fellowship when they refused to confess the WELS' gospel of Universal Objective Justification - God's forgiveness without faith.
In light of these facts, and the acceptance of them, (indicated by the resulting deafening silence) why are some agitated when the same individuals, who excommunicated Christ's faithful servant for teaching and confessing the Gospel according to Scripture, have manipulated the acceptance of a new age translation of the Bible?
A Synod, church or person can go to no greater depths of doctrinal depravity then to declare as heresy Scriptures chief and central doctrine of one Justification solely by the gracious gift of faith in Christ alone. Rejection of the Gospel is separation from Christ and since there is no depth of the rejection of Christ which signifies greater separation - the rejection of Christ's Gospel is a destination and not a journey or decline. All other false doctrine and practice that eminates from that rejection is simply fruit of UOJ's unbelief and rejection of God's revealed Word.
I believe how a person responds to a denomination which has reached such a doctrinal destination as opposed to one that is in doctrinal decline should be significantly more decisive.
The overwhelming acceptance of UOJ as Christ's gospel, and at the expense of Christ's true Gospel, is a great falling away from the Truth.
I don't think "so many" people are agitated by what Bible translation the WELS chooses to use. I think way too few people are agitated, or even concerned. If there is a great number out there who are opposed to the 2011 NIV but silent, they are neither agitated or concerned or more would be heard from them. God's Word is being changed in plain view, but I suspect more of a fuss would be heard if internet connectivity was lost for just an hour!
In the few decades of my life, all in the WELS, I've seen good pastors in this synod teach and preach that we don't change God's Word. These men recognized that an agenda of gender neutrality applied in a Bible translation was and is changing God's Word. I even know of some pastors who once preached and taught that very thing, and now, a few short years later, they seem to have forgotten what they themselves taught.
You pointed out that the problems under discussion did not happen overnight; that they have been going on for some time. I agree with you, but I think that never have they been in the forefront, for all to see, as they were in this convention on this topic. Change in the synod is accelerating. And perhaps, if some will take the time to contact synod leaders, as Pastor Spencer suggested, they can point out to these leaders that now, on their watch, the change is past the point of becoming institutionalized. It has progressed to the next stage and is now being openly "celebrated". We are told by leaders to rejoice in all the forms of God's Word we have available to us? No matter whether they blatantly contradict each other? This is a reason to rejoice? That God would say one thing in one translation, and something different in another? Does this sound like God to anyone? But this is what synod leaders are asking their lay people to celebrate, and it is happening on their watch.
Vernon
"The Synod has officially and overwhelmingly condemned the Gospel." This rhetoric is way beyond the pale of credibility. We accuse the Roman papacy of condemning the Gospel. We don't, however, even accuse the Reformed and Arminian sects of condemning the Gospel. Are we, now, to understand that you put the WELS in the same category as the very Antichrist?
There are a number of things for which the WELS is rightly criticized. "Condemning the Gospel" is not one of them. With this accusation you have raised the rhetoric to the level of the blatantly inflammatory. This is the kind of speech that puts guys in the category of "worthy to be ignored."
I admonish you to reconsider your words and retract them.
Rev. Rob Lawson, ACLC Superintendent
You say that I have "raised the rhetoric to the level of the blatantly inflammatory."
I never said anything about the WELS condemning the Gospel until the WELS came in and publicly and officially condemned the Gospel as heresy.
I ask you, then, who raised the rhetoric to that level? Do you not think it was blatantly inflammatory for a district presidium of the WELS to step into a congregation and brand a pastor as a "heretic" and "false teacher" for proclaiming that sinners are justified only by faith in Christ, not because faith is a good or worthy work, but as faith lays hold of Christ, the Righteous One? Do you not think it was blatantly inflammatory for this presidium to then stand by its condemnation and suspend this pastor?
What have they done, then, but condemn the Gospel?
Believe me, it brings me no pleasure to say such things, and I wish it weren't true. But failing to call a spade a spade helps no one.
It is quite evident that the WELS publically, officially, and overwhelmingly affirms the Gospel—that we are saved by the merits of Christ, received by faith alone. You claim that you were called a heretic and a false teacher because you taught that sinners are justified by faith in Christ, etc. Yet every verifiable thing we have seen is that you were not removed for teaching the subjective aspect of Justification, which WELS also affirms, but for rejecting the objective aspect, which WELS understands to be the basis of the Gospel.
Rev. Rob Lawson
http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/05/an-essay-on-article-of-justification.html
What would the WELS' response be to the charge that their chief doctrine of UOJ teaches synergistic Salvation?
According to UOJ, as the WELS, LCMS and ELS confesses it, faith is a work of man and by it receive salvation when they believe that they were forgiven by God through Christ's atonement (Modern Lutheran theologians are split as to whether the whole unbelieving world was forgiven when Christ said it was finished, when Christ died on the cross or when He rose from the grave). Faith remains a meritorious work through consistent application of the doctrinal tenets of UOJ. As has been pointed out clearly for years - there is not one tenet of UOJ that is faithful to Scripture or the Lutheran Confessions. It requires an ecclectic mix of the world's religions to translate a Bible that can support it.
“On the other hand he must preach "another gospel" in which the right faith, as a hand, does not merely grasp the righteousness already gained and bestowed, but obtains a deserving character as a work of a good nature.”
“I will readily believe that Professor Weenaas has not comprehended the whole range of his teaching. Likewise that he himself has not drawn all these consequences from his doctrine. However, logic is an inexorable adversary and these consequences follow by logical necessity from the meaning he gives faith, not as a plain and simple hand which only grasps what is already at hand and is given, but as a work, a condition which works on God's heart and calls forth something which was not there before, love, the conferring of grace and justification.”
http://www.christforus.org/Papers/Content/HermanAmbergPreusonJustificationofWorld.htm
WELS’ Mark Zarling confirms my assertion:
”The other extreme is to stress subjective justification without understanding the objective reality. This error leads to synergism in one form or the other. Stressing faith as the cause of justification makes it a meritorious work. We have then destroyed the sola gratia of the Gospel, and cause men to look within themselves for the assurance of salvation. Put very simply, justification is misunderstood if we misapply Law and Gospel.” Page 8
http://www.wlsessays.net/files/ZarlingJustification.pdf
Those familiar with the eternal conflict between UOJ and JBFA will agree that UOJ teaches faith is a work of man by their contention that faith becomes synergistic if by faith alone man is forgiven. Carrying that confession through UOJ’s teaching that their faith is required to be saved eternally and the doctrine of UOJ establishes man’s work of believing being required for eternal salvation. UOJ teaches synergistic salvation in order for men to receive the benefit of Christ’s righteousness bestowed upon them while they were alive to sin, dead in sins and under God’s wrath and condemnation.