Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live

Ski News from the August St. Peter Freedom Newsletter

$
0
0


http://stpetercares.com/Websites/stpetercares/files/Content/3808791/Church_Newsletter_-_8-13.pdf

Congregational Meeting and Open Forum @ The CORE. August 13th, 6:30 PM.

A special meeting will be held at our downtown campus (so it is not a "new mission"?) The CORE to discuss the current staffing situation at both our campuses and where things stand 6 months after Pastor Ski stepped aside and was suspended and later chose to resign.

Please put this date on your calendar and plan to attend as we are 1 church on two campuses and our staff works at both campuses.

From Intrepid Lutherans - The 2013 WELS Retreat from the Bible

$
0
0

twissted.sisster has left a new comment on your post "From Intrepid Lutherans - The 2013 WELS Retreat fr...":

Leave it to the WELS to make indecisiveness their decision and waste time and money in doing so. I see it as a rubberstamp of the NNIV. They could have voted it out right then and there but instead NPH will now be able to use it at will. Buyers beware!

---

http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2013/08/2013-wels-convention-and-endorsement-of.html#more

THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2013

2013 WELS Convention and the Endorsement of NIV 2011.


The following discussion was held on the Facebook Wall of Daniel Baker -- who was a delegate to this year's WELS Convention -- and is reproduced here with his permission. There are several points in this discussion worth consideration, and worth responding to -- sooner being better than later.
  1. Even though the 2011 Synod Convention called for the TEC to educate the laity so that they would be prepared for the task of choosing a translation, can anyone say there was much evidence that such had happened? Did the delegates display evidence suggesting they were prepared to thoughtfully deliberate the issues?
  2. What does it really mean to decide that "All translations are equally deficient, so we will use them all"...?
  3. What does it really mean when it is said that "All translations are equally God's Word, so it is a disparagement of God's Word to cast doubt on any of them"...?
  4. What does it really mean when it is said that "All translations are equally God's Word, isn't it wonderful that we have God's Word in so many forms"...?
  5. How crippling is the division in our Synod?
  6. Why is it that the "New Method Lutherans," in addition to harangue-ing everyone to become relevant by absorbing pop-culture into the church, also seem to be the one's pushing post-Modern linguistics? 
  7. What do you think about endorsing a given translation (NKJV was suggested below), and mounting an education campaign targeted at the laity, with the specific purpose of warning about the dangers of "Dynamic Equivalence" and "Functional Equivalence" and identifying their roots in post-Modern philosophy, while building up the virtues of Formal and Optimal Equivalence?
  8. Knowing that the CoP and the entire faculties of MLC and WLS, along with what appears to be a majority of WELS Administrators, are on the side of the "New Method Lutherans," what would you think of such and effort knowing that it would come from outside those sources, and probably rely on scholarship from outside WELS?
Be assured, the "New Method Lutherans" see the endorsement of NIV 2011 alongside all other translation as a big opportunity to drive forward with the next big NIV release. They'll be better organized next time. And they are always better funded.

What other options or considerations may there be?



Daniel Baker at 2013 WELS Convention
Daniel Baker
Here's a summary of the WELS Convention's translation issue:

  1. We approved all translations of Holy Scripture for use in our publications (the "eclectic approach").
  2. We gave NPH sole discretion to decide what translations to use.
  3. An overwhelming majority (over 3/4ths) voted against a Confessional Lutheran translation.
Some general observations:

  • Opposition to a "Confessional Lutheran Translation" seemed to be overwhelming. There were even a number of speakers and a proposed amendment to strike "Confessional Lutheran" from the Resolution.
  • The outgoing editor of NPH was on the TFC, which supported and recommended NNIV.
  • NNIV is clearly on the list of NPH options, and prior to an amendment was the first on a short list of three options for their use.
  • Sem. Profs made it clear that the result of the "eclectic approach" would be settling on just one translation - by "herd" decision, as one pastor and televangelist delegate put it.
As such, it seems clear to me that we are far from out of the NNIV woods.
1Like ·  · 
  • Angela Gawel Al's not here to translate anymore. I think I get the gist but sometime I will have to have someone explain it:) just one question ... What would Alfred think of the outcome?
  • Daniel Baker He would probably have mixed feelings like the rest of us.
  • Paul Rydecki More like, you are deep in the heart of the NNIV forest.
    5 hours ago · Like · 5
  • Intrepid Lutherans Been thinking about this for several minutes after Committee 22 completed (and I posted this, below, too). Initially hopeful after last night's vote on Resolution 1 from Committee 21, the defeat of Resolution 1 from Committee 22 makes Resolution 1 of Committee 21 merely an acknowledgement of the fact that (a) all translations are equally deficient, and (b) we're really okay with that. No one could bring themselves to reject, say, the Watchtower as a translation to be avoided, the Douay-Rheims as a translation to be avoided, or even the "LOL-cat" translation of the Bible as a translation to be avoided. In the words of Seminary Presidents Wendland and Cherney, "They are all equally God's Word! Isn't it a wonderful thing that we have God's Word in so many forms?"

    It is apparent to me, however, that there are really two, and only two, reasons the WELS faculties opposed this -- and neither has anything to do with money or time. 

      (1) Their is a stark division in WELS regarding linguistic philosophy, which impacts our fundamental understanding of the nature and function of language, and consequently, the nature of that which was Breathed by God, and thus also, the appropriate Christian principles for translating God's Word into English or any other language. This division is exposed now, yet we are led to believe that we can live with this division as if it does not impact our working together. Yet, a WELS translation effort will fail to progress beyond merely starting on this very point -- and that failure WILL EXPOSE HOW TRULY CRIPPLING THIS DIVISION IS.

      (2) Even though we most certainly do have the *technical skill* to translate the Bible, we simply do not have the *literary talent* to produce an excellent translation. Like it or not, the KJV is *still* the standard of literary excellence, and they know that the product of any translation effort we would undertake would be compared to the KJV, and failing to measure up, would simply land somewhere in the plethora of *equally flat and deficient* translations we already have to choose from, none of which really distinguish themselves. A general rejection of our translation as an excellent one, on such grounds, would likely represent a general indictment of our school system, which is so highly respected.

    That's my take on this. -DL


    lolcatbible.com
    Blessinz of teh Ceiling Cat be apwn yu, srsly. This is the lolcat Bible Translat...See More



    5 hours ago · Like · 4
  • Timothy H. Buelow Still trying to find a positive take, I do believe that we were earlier in this position: Prove to us why we shouldn't just keep using NIV (even if it's a different animal) and now we are in this position: Prove to me which Bible we should primarily use. And NNIV supporters are now under the burden of proof they didn't have before.
    5 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Paul Rydecki Tim, what difference is there between the two positions in practice? Who has to prove anything anymore to anyone?
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Intrepid Lutherans Yeah, that's the other side of this. Minds still need changing. The outcome of this Convention certainly means that the issues of translation will continue to be debated. I suppose that's a good thing, for the many who yet need to be taught, and for others who need (and are willing) to have their minds changed. I, for one, am growing weary... -DL
    4 hours ago · Like · 3
  • Daniel Baker As am I. The number of "nice speech, but I think Luther believed in a balance of dynamic and formal equivalence" comments I got was mind-boggling.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Paul Rydecki Rather than further debate, I think these decisions turn translation into a non-issue ad infinitum.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Timothy H. Buelow Repeatedly, people said this was a 5-7 year solution. So during the next 5-7 years, the debate and sorting will continue. That gives people like me, for example, the chance to promote NKJV, which wasn't even on the table before. It also gives people time to rethink opposition to ESV, because it gives pastors the implicit approval to maybe switch to ESV for Sunday readings, etc.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Intrepid Lutherans When you come up with a plan to promote the NKJV, let me know. That's my choice, too. Maybe an organized effort of some sort is needed....-DL
    4 hours ago · Like · 4
  • Timothy H. Buelow Paul, as long as pastors have to wrestle with answering their confirmation parents question of which Bible to buy their kids, this will never be a forgotten non-issue.
  • Daniel Baker Someone said (I think it was you, Pr. Buelow) that Zondervan also purchased the NKJV? What would the feasibility of our own "contemporization" of the KJV be?
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Intrepid Lutherans Thomas Nelson, publisher of NKJV, was purchased by Murdock -- the same guy who owns Zondervan...
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Paul Rydecki The average pastor will answer that question, "Whatever Bible translation NPH chooses to use for our synod's catechism." I don't see it going any deeper than that for the majority of pastors.
    4 hours ago · Like · 4
  • Timothy H. Buelow There are partially updated versions of the KJV available as public domain for anyone who wants to use them as a base for further revision.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Timothy H. Buelow But NKJV is not being revised anymore. It's set.
  • Timothy H. Buelow I believe the synod is free to, and hopefully will, use more than one translation in the Catechism. That is in fact what the ELS catechism does.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Steve Spencer Since ALL translations were approved for use, this means that the NNIV was approved - that's the bottom line. This makes WELS more "progressive" (i.e. liberal) than the ELS, LCMS, and Southern Baptists. Now, that is really going to help our outreach - right?! ;-} Thus, we decided - once again - not to decide; except to reject our President's suggestion. Can we say, "Lame Duck?!"
    4 hours ago · Like · 5
  • Timothy H. Buelow Well, Steve, we voted to say no to our seminary president. That's not a small thing.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Intrepid Lutherans And now with another bright side, here, perhaps. Leaving open the option, now, for NPH to use NKJV, means that they can also begin republishing older works that use(d) the KJV with minimal redevelopment cost... -DL
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Paul Rydecki The synod is now free to do what NPH wants. Does anyone doubt that a good percentage of catechism passages will be taken from the NNIV, thus essentially promoting it (even if others may also be represented)?
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Steve Spencer Good point, Tim. Still, if I were the ELS I'd be very nervous. At least they REJECTED the NNIV for use. And, what prevents Mequon from requiring the NNIV for use by the students? I'll give you odds that this is exactly what happens.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Intrepid Lutherans NPH has TWO potent sources which drive their editorial decisions. One is Synod. The other is the consumer (the laity,principally). Boycott efforts DO work... Without pressure from the consumer, however, no I don't doubt that they will use NNIV exclusively.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Paul Rydecki That's one thing that caused great confusion at this convention. "Loyalty to the synod," which is the chief deciding factor in, I dare say, most cases, became ambiguous, because synod president promotes Option 2, while seminary president promotes both options 1 and 2, but favors 1. Nonetheless, seminary president also endorsed Option 2, while being against doing a new translation. So, if you look at it, the convention actually supported the seminary president as well as they could by choosing Option 2 (which Schroeder also promoted), while rejecting Schroeder's appeal to do a new translation, thus supporting the seminary president.
    4 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1
  • Jerome T. Gernander The ELS has always left it up to congregations. The NKJV is used in the Hymnary, which for me gives it precedence. However, the ELS catechism committee very unwisely chose not to follow that, and uses PREDOMINANTLY the old NIV, a very bad choice, in my opinion; with some exceptions (e.g. Philippians 2:5-8). We use the black catechism but I have the kids look up the verses in their NKJV. Our school uses NKJV, and our church gives each 2nd grader an NKJV Bible. (I do like the ESV as well.) I would support print-on-demand catechisms with the translation that the congregation uses.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Paul Rydecki To me, it appears that Wendland outmaneuvered Schroeder.
  • Intrepid Lutherans All of Wendland's allies seemed to be vocal at key times on the Convention floor, that's for sure. There were lot's of them there, too.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Daniel Baker Well as I just heard in the lunch line, it's not too late to form a relationship with Zondervan. Perhaps a future rendition of the NIV.
  • Timothy H. Buelow The rejection of NNIV as an exclusive translation was not much of a possibility two years ago. Now it has happened because lay delegates were given the information they needed in most districts. That is a huge development and points to a rising awareness among pastors also that this is serious. Thus I disagree that only a few care. I believe the evidence calls that bluff. Now the important thing will be to take the opportunity of a level playing field and redouble efforts to teach positively about the relative merits of more formal equivalence.
    4 hours ago · Like · 4
  • Paul Rydecki Tim, if the majority (certainly the vocal majority) of the seminary professors, including the president, weren't so vociferously advocating dynamic equivalence, you may have gotten some traction on that suggestion. But if I had the power to make guarantees, I would guarantee you that there will not be a rising up of opposition to the synod's own seminary. Will never happen. Not ever.
    4 hours ago · Like · 2
  • Timothy H. Buelow Paul, you sound a little like "I, even I am the only one left" who would ever consider that my professors' opinions are just that. When we were at sem, there was always debate whether, for example, Kuske's take on the hermeneutics of typology was "the only right way." And you could always play one prof off another. I have two boys there, so I know this takes place.
    4 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Timothy H. Buelow Further, Paul, you also know there is a spectrum between formal and dynamic equivalence. I personally like Holman's "optimal equivalence."
  • Paul Rydecki It was the absolute inability to even question the opinions of professors that has led to my fortuitous (though unintentional) departure from the synod. I would be happy to be proven wrong about this synodical handicap, but so far, history supports my prediction.
  • Intrepid Lutherans Among the clergy, I would tend to agree with Rev. Rydecki, based on my limited and informal experience. Even those who know better seem to be reticent to vocalize opposition to Synod in any form, especially if that means they might be critical of the Seminary. But what I heard at this convention from the *laity* convinces me that they *are* paying attention, and are willing to question both Synod and the Seminary. The startling decline of culture around them is teaching them to question everything these days, I think. I don't know, maybe we at IL are helping them. Then again, maybe we're a hindrance. Either way, they're *clearly* calling upon that which they have been taught, and finding that what they are now being told doesn't sound right. They might not know precisely what, but something isn't right, they know it, and they are looking for information. They didn't get information prompting them to oppose the NNIV from Synod, or from the TEC... -DL
    4 hours ago · Like · 4
  • Paul Rydecki Since I mentioned Orwell's 1984 the other day, "If there is hope, it lies with the proles."
  • Intrepid Lutherans Yeah, sounds like Marx, too.......
  • Joe Jewell "...we voted to say no to our seminary president. That's not a small thing..."

    That's a good point--strong culture against this in the WELS! I got Faceblocked by a WELS pastor yesterday for suggesting that the Sem prez's "They all have flaws!" stateme
    nt as a justification for not trying to choose the best option was postmodern relativism. Seems like a pretty noncontroversial point to me, to be honest, since I feel like the TEC was leaning pretty heavily on the idea that it's all a very subjective question. But hey, what do I know--just a layman here!

    That said, I don't think we said "No" *enough*. We should have said "No" to the NIV2011 altogether.

    This whole concept of "the professor is always right and it is unbrotherly to say otherwise [especially for a layman, who can't possibly know what he's talking about, right?]" is so foreign to me as a scientist. In my field, no one is so off-limits that his work and opinions aren't subject to vigorous criticism and competing analysis!
    3 hours ago · Like · 6
  • Intrepid Lutherans Maybe that's my problem, Joe. I studied too much science and mathematics in college, and expect a rigorous proof for all conclusions (which are "truth" or at least "fact" assertions).... -DL
    3 hours ago · Like · 1

How Far Are Rock Churches from Raves and Pagan Worship?

$
0
0



Where did I see rave-like settings for "worship"?

This was formerly the chancel of a WELS church.
The CORE did not stay but moved on to a bar,
which WELS bought for them.

The CORE

This is one of Andy Stanley's Babtist "sets."
They change the set for each sermon series.

An Former WELS Member Observed This about the Convention

$
0
0


All I can say about the WELS convention that just ended is: 

I am glad I resigned from that synod.  Had I been a delegate, I would have been excommunicated before the closing worship service.
 

 

ELCA Takes Emergent Churches to the Next Logical Step

$
0
0


ELCA young adults land on their feet
13-54-CHB
“Nadia Bolz-Weber has probably done more than any other pastor in recent times to poke therapeutic fun at the misdemeanors and flaws of overly-churched Christianity and Christians. The passion behind her words, however, is as deeply pastoral as it is God-drenched and liberating….thus the affection as well as the respect that attend her and her work wherever she goes.” -Phylis Tickle author of “The Great Emergenc


     CHICAGO (ELCA) -- Every year young adults from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) volunteer to take a huge leap of faith and offer themselves in service in distant places. They pack their bags, say goodbye to family and friends and embark on a life-changing journey.

     The ELCA’s Young Adults in Global Mission program is a one-year international mission opportunity for young people between the ages of 19 to 29 to learn about themselves, their relationship with God and their place in God’s world.

     When the program started in 1999, eight young adults volunteered in the United Kingdom. Since then, more than 450 volunteers have participated in the program, working with Lutheran companion churches and organizations around the world. Young adults from other U.S. Christian denominations also participate in the ELCA’s program.

     In August 2013, 64 young adult volunteers will travel overseas to serve with ELCA mission personnel in locations that include Africa, Asia, Mexico, the Middle East and South America. The volunteers work 35 to 40 hours a week at a variety of placement sites including churches, schools and hospitals.

Pope Frankly Embraces UOJ. Pope Francis: Being an atheist is alright as long as you do good - Europe - World - The Independent

$
0
0
Pope Francis: Being an atheist is alright as long as you do good - Europe - World - The Independent:


Pope Francis has said that atheists should be seen as good people as long as they do good, in a move to urge people of all religions - or no religion at all - to get along.


The Catholic leader, who heads the 1.2 billion-strong Church, made his comments in the homily of his morning Mass in his residence, a daily event where he speaks without prepared comments.

He told the story of a Catholic who asked a priest if even atheists could be redeemed by Jesus.

"Even them, everyone," the pope answered, according to Vatican Radio. "We all have the duty to do good," he said.

"Just do good and we'll find a meeting point," the pope said in a hypothetical conversation in which someone told a priest: "But I don't believe. I'm an atheist."

Pope Francis's comments are in marked contrast to his predecessor Benedict, who is reported to have left some non-Catholics feeling that he saw them as second-class believers.
'via Blog this'

The Cat From Hell Has a Demon Child

Mary Thompson on the WELS Process - Diaprax

$
0
0

Listening to the audio of the segment of resolutions re: the Bible Translation issue was enlightening only to confirm how methodically the dialectic process management has permeated WELS since it adopted the PPBS (management by objectives system) in late 1960's.   Where have the serious pastors and laymen been for  the forty six years they have failed to recognize what has been done unto them and allowed themselves to be manipulated.  

When the agenda to get rid  of the KJV began in earnest, the scenario was first to convince laypeople that 20th Century readers were incapable of understanding the KJV.  Then came the questionnaires designed to foster agreement with that premise.  The planners and programmers having destroyed confidence in  KJV as a vehicle to reach the unchurched with the Word., the process (and it is a managed process) began to convince WELS members that any other translation would be better than KJV, so using any or all of them out there was encouraged.   Bible classes became exercises in asking, "what does your bible say?" instead of "Thus saith the Lord".  When that planned phase of obfuscation had run it's course, the process of facilitating to acceptance of one (anything but KJV) translation was necessary.   NIV was the choice of the planners and the programmers, and the pastors and laymen followed without a whole lot of  ripples.   The strongest objectors had long since been removed or departed.  That is called identifying objectors and removing same.  It's all explained in books and training  manuals for change agents to operate in  any segment or society or organization.

A couple generations have now been raised on NIV, and can only argue from the NIV platform in relation to the even worse NNIV.  Until WELS pastors and laypeople understand the Hegelian Dialectic Process, they will never grasp what has been done and continues to be done unto them.

It is a PROCESS  with identifying terminology.   I was struck by the mention of a next phase taking five to seven years.   Doesn't anyone remember  the old Soviet Union's ongoing five year plans?  Anyone who has observed or is involved with managing by objectives is very familiar with five to seven year plans as the process grinds to what  has already been decided to be accepted.  That is why it is called PROCESS.

It operates in, under and around the show of resolutions at conferences with delegates unable or unwilling to think for themselves and do some homework which would reveal what they don't want to know.  

***

GJ - The same process was used to close down Northwestern College, a move as unpopular as promoting the New NIV. Everyone got to vote, and they hated the idea. They kept pushing the idea until people stopped resisting. When the WELS leaders in charge flipped the actual results, because the amalgamation vote actually failed at the convention, no one objected and the election committee was too chicken to tell the truth. The districts had to ratify this illegal move, and they stood mute while Gurgle said it would only cost $8 million, or they would pull the plug. But the contracts were already signed, Gurgle said, and they could not stop. So they were "voting" on nothing. It was a done deal as soon as the election committee rolled over and played dead.

One can blame the process factories or blame the sheep that volunteer their millions each year to go through this charade.

Gurgle was supposedly told to resign. Schroeder was going to fix things, but he is even more of an enabler than Gurgle was.


ChurchMouse has written about Diaprax.

Architects of ELCA Apostasy To Speak Against ELCA Apostasy.Braaten, Jenson, Senn - Oh My!

$
0
0
http://www.alpb.org/forum/index.php?topic=5120.0




Only a few more days until the most important events of this year, the Lutheran CORE and NALC Convocations and Theological Conference.     ;D

The NALC web site states that these events will be live streamed on the internet.

       According to this recent article by Robert Benne




Quote

The ELCA’s most distinguished theologians—Robert Jenson, Carl Braaten, James Nestingen, David Yeago—are all now persona non grata within that church and are speaking writing in different churches and venues.

***

GJ - The Braaten-Jenson dogmatics textbook is so bad that ELCA seminaries tried to hide the fact of its academic dominance in the early days of its publication. Now the same two-volume collection of Dreck is considered old school.

The authors had that same unearned arrogance that typified the Wauwatosa seminary professors, about how intellectual, elite, and ground-breaking they were. I read the same material (in much better style) by the 19th century rationalist.

Wait a minute - Frank Senn was a pioneer in gay activism, and now he is speaking at the LCMC-NALC gathering, which formed because of the gay activism of ELCA.

Next - the Church and Changers of WELS will join the Church Shrinkers of Missouri to denounce the doctrinal apostasy and entertainment evangelism of their sects.


Luther's Sermon for the Tenth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 19:41-48

$
0
0
Josephus left a vivid account of Jerusalem's destruction,
which Jesus foresaw and described in this lesson.



Luther's Sermon for the TENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY. Luke 19:41-48.



This sermon appeared first in the year 1525, and was issued in pamphlet form in nearly a dozen separate editions. From this we conclude that it awakened a great interest among the people, as it certainly ought to have done. It bore the title: “A sermon on the destruction of Jerusalem. In like manner will Germany also be destroyed, if she will not recognize the time of her visitation. What the temple of God is. Martin Luther. Wittenberg, 1525.”

Text. Luke 19:41-48. And when he drew nigh, he saw the city and wept over it, saying, If thou hadst known in this day, even thou, the things which belong unto peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall come upon thee, when thine enemies shall cast up a bank about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall dash thee to the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

And he entered into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold, saying unto them, It is written, And my house shall be a house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of robbers.

And he was teaching dally in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the principal men of the people sought to destroy him: and they could not find what they might do; for the people all hung upon him, listening.

CONTENTS:

THE PROPHECY OF CHRIST CONCERNING THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM, AND THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE BY CHRIST.
I. THE PROPHECY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM.

The summary and contents of this Gospel. 1.

A. Why the destruction of the city of Jerusalem was prophesied.

2. There are two ways to preach against the despisers of God’s Word. 3-4.

B. The way and manner Christ delivered this prophecy. 4-6.

C. How and why the Jews did not believe this prophecy. 7.

D. The destruction which is taught by this prophecy.

1. The destruction in itself. 8-10.

2. How and why this destruction will also visit Germany. a. Why this destruction will come upon Germany. 11f. b. How the beginning of this destruction has already taken place. 11- 13. It is a great blessing when God gives us his Word, and a great sin when that word is despised. 13-14. c. In what way should we seek to prevent this destruction.

3. The cause of this destruction.

16. Concerning the anxious care for the body. (Bauchsorge. ) a. This anxious care dishonors God. 17f. b. How and why believers should flee from this care. c. The fruits and workings of this care. d. This anxious care is a very great evil. 20-22.

E. How should this prophecy serve us. 23.

II. THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE.

1. How Christ teaches by this cleansing, what the true temple of God is. 24-25f. Why the temple at Jerusalem ie called holy.

2. What moved Christ to undertake this cleansing. 27f. Judgment concerning the churches and cloisters of the Papists. 28-29.

3. How Christ makes room for his Word by this cleansing.

20. An admonition to pray to God to turn his anger from us. 30.

God punishes most severely the despising of his Word. 31-33.

4. How and why Christ lets us view his great anger and zeal in his cleansing of the temple. 34-36. The abominations of the Papacy. 37-38.

5. How Christ makes a beginning here and at the same time gives a prelude to what the Romans should do with the temple.

6. How this cleansing is to be applied to the Reformation. 40f. The world unjustly ascribes the cause of its misfortune to the Gospel. 41- 42.

THE SUMMARY OF THIS GOSPEL:

1. This Gospel teaches us faith and love. It reminds us of faith in that it pictures to us Christ the Lord, who he is, and how he is disposed. Here view the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9.

2. It teaches us love in that Christ forgets his own praise which men gave him, when he entered Jerusalem riding upon an ass and wept over the misfortune which should come upon the people.

3. The time of their visitation they knew not, who now, since the Gospel is preached to them, do not accept Christ. Therefore they must also perish, and this is given as a warning and an admonition.

4. What is the church today but a house of merchandise, where people sell everything, even the forgiveness of sins. Woe to us!

PART 1. THE PROPHECY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM.

1. This Gospel presents that which took place on Palm Sunday, when Christ rode into Jerusalem. On this occasion, he preached two or three days in the temple, which was more than he ever did before at one time.

The sum and substance of this Gospel is, that Christ grieves and laments over the afflictions of those who despise God’s Word.

2. Now you have often heard what the Word of God is, what it brings us, and what kind of scholars it has. Of all this nothing is said here. Only the punishment and distress which shall come upon the Jews because they would not recognize the time of their visitation, are here described. And let us well consider this, because the time of their visitation also deeply concerns us. If they are punished who do not know the time of their visitation, what will be done to those who maliciously persecute, blaspheme and disgrace the Gospel and the Word of God? However, here he only speaks of those who do not know it.

3. There are two methods of preaching against the despisers of God’s Word. The first is by threats, as Christ threatens them in Matthew 11:21-24: “Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee Bethsaida! for if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon which were done in you, they would have repented long’ ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, it shail be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for you. And thou, Capernaum (which was his own city, where he performed most of his mighty works), shalt thou be exalted unto heaven? thou shalt go down unto hell; for if the mighty works had been done in Sodom which were done in thee, it would have remained until this day. But I sos’ unto you that it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.” With these threatening words he would frighten them to their senses, and not to cast to the winds the Word which God sends them.

4. The other method the Lord gives here when he weeps, and shows his sympathy for the poor blinded people, and rebukes and threatens them, not as the hardened and stubbornly blind; but when he melts in love and compassion over his enemies, and with great heart-rending pity and cries, he tells them what shall befall them, which he would gladly prevent, but all is in vain. In the passage just quoted, Matthew 11:21-24, where he rebukes them, he does not treat them in love, but in the severity of faith.

However here, it is all sincere love and mercy. This is worthy of our consideration.

5. First, as he approached the city they went before and followed him with songs of great joy, saying: “Hosanna to the Son of David? and spread their garments in the way and cut branches from the trees and strewed them in the way; the whole scene was most glorious. But in the midst of all this joy he begins to weep. He permits all the world to be joyful, while he himself was bowed with grief, when he beheld the city and said: “If thou hadst known in this day, even thou, the things that belong unto peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.”

6. As though he would say: Oh, if you only knew what belongs to your peace, that you might not be destroyed, but be preserved with both temporal and eternal peace, you would yet this day consider, and redeem the time! And now it is high time for you to know what is for your highest welfare. But you are blind, and will neglect the opportunity, until there shall be neither help nor counsel. As though to say: Here you stand, firmly built, and within you are strong and mighty men, who, secure and happy, think there is no danger! Yet, about forty years more, and you shall be utterly destroyed. The Lord plainly says this in these words: “For the days shall come upon thee, when thy enemies shall cast up a bank about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side and shall dash thee to the ground, d and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knowest not the time of thy visitation.”

7. But the Jews were stubborn, and depended on God’s promises, which they thought meant nothing else than that they should continue forever.

They were secure, and vainly thought: God will not do such things to us.

We own the temple; here God himself dwells; besides we have mighty men, money and treasures enough to defy all our enemies! For even the Romans, and the emperor after he had conquered the city, confessed that the city was so well and firmly built, that it would have been impossible to take it, had God not especially willed it. Therefore they trusted in their own glory, and built their confidence on a false delusion, which finally deceived them.

8. The Lord, however, saw deeper into the future than they when he said:

O, Jerusalem! if thou hadst known what I know, thou wouldst seek thy peace. Peace in the Scriptures means, when all things go well with us. You now think you have pleasant days, but if you knew how your enemies will encamp round about you, compass you about and hedge you in on every side, crush you to the ground and demolish all your beautiful buildings, and leave not one stone upon another; you would eagerly accept the Word, which brings to you solid peace and every blessing. [The woeful history of the destruction of Jerusalem you can read in books, from which those who wish will easily understand this Gospel.] 9. God caused his threats to be executed even thus, that the city was besieged at the time of the Easter festival, when the Jews were assembled within the walls of Jerusalem from every land, and as the historian Josephus writes, there were together at that time about three million people. This was an enormous multitude. Only one hundred thousand people would have been enough to crowd the city. But all this great multitude God in his wrath intended to bake, melt and weld together into one mass of ruin. Yet, the Apostles and Christians were all out of the city, they had withdrawn into the land of Herod, Samaria, Galilee, and were scattered among the heathen. Thus God separated and saved the good grain and poured the chaff into one place. There was such an immense multitude of Jews present, that they were sufficient to devour a whole kingdom, to say nothing of only one city. They also fell into such distress and famine, that they devoured everything and had nothing left, until they were at last compelled to eat their leather bow-strings, shoe latchets and shoe leather; and finally mothers moved by their distress butchered their own children, which the soldiers snatched from them, for they smelt the odor of the boiling meat through the squares of the city. They used dove’s dung for salt, which commanded a high price. In short, there was distress and bloodshed enough to melt a rock to tears; so that no one could have believed that God’s wrath could be so horrible and that he would so unmercifully martyr a people. The buildings and the streets were piled full of the dead, who perished from starvation, and yet the Jews were so raging that they defied God and refused to yield, until the emperor was compelled to use force and capture the city, when they could no longer maintain their ground.

10. And as some Jews were such rogues as to swallow their money so that it could not be taken from them, the soldiers thought that they all had swallowed their money; therefore they cut them open by the thousands, hunting for it. The slaughter and destruction were so great, that even the heathen were moved to compassion, and the emperor was forced to give orders no longer to destroy them, but to take them prisoners and sell them as slaves. The Jews then became so cheap, that thirty were sold for a penny; and thus they were scattered throughout the whole world, and were everywhere despised as the vilest people on earth, and thus they are everywhere regarded at the present day, everywhere dispersed, without a city or a country of their own, and they can never meet again as they vainly believe to establish their priesthood and kingdom. Thus God avenged the death of Christ and all his prophets, and paid them back because they knew not the day of their visitation.

APPLICATION TO GERMANY.

11. Here let us learn a lesson, for this concerns us, not us alone who are here present, but the whole country of Germany. It is not a mere jest, nor should we think that it will go different with us. The Jews would not believe until they experienced it and became conscious of it. God has now also visited us, and has opened the precious treasures of his holy Gospel unto us, by which we can learn God’s will, and see how we were held by the power of the devil. Yet no one will earnestly believe it, yea, we much more despise it and make light of it. No city, no officer of the government is thankful for the Gospel; and what is still worse the great majority persecute and blaspheme it. God has great patience; he waits to see how we will deal with his Gospel; but when we once let the opportunity slip, he will take his Word from us, and then the wrath which consumed the Jews will also con-st, me us. For it is one and the selfsame Word, the very same God, and the identical Christ, the Jews themselves had; therefore the punishment in body and soul will also most certainly be the same. [We, of course, regard it as mockery, and care nothing for it. This is only an evidence of our own blindness. We ought to perceive that God is hardening us; for there is not a single city that is concerned about it; no officer of the law shows any zeal in its favor. It is most deplorable.] And I fear the time will yet come when Germany will lay in a heap of ruins. The evil winds have already begun to blow destruction in our peasant war. We have already lost many people. Nearly one hundred thousand men, only between Easter and Pentecost! It is an awful work of God, and I fear it will not stop at this. It is only a foretaste of a threat to frighten us, that we may prepare ourselves for the coming ordeal. So far it is but a fox’s tail, but God will soon come with a terrible scourge, and lash us to pieces.

12. But we will act just like the Jews, and care nothing for it, until all help and counsel are lost forever. Now we might check it, for now it is high time for us to know what is best for us, and accept the Gospel in peace, while grace is brought, and peace is offered unto us. But we permit one day after another, one year after another to pass, and do even less than formerly. No one prays now, no one is in earnest. When the time is past, prayers will be of no avail. We do not lay it to heart, and think we are safe, and do not see the awful calamity which has already begun, and are not aware that God so dreadfully punishes us with false prophets and sects, which he sends us everywhere, and who preach so securely as though they had swallowed the Holy Spirit whole. Those whom we had thought were the very best among us, go to work and lead the people astray, until they scarcely know what to do or leave undone.

13. But this is only a beginning, although it is frightful and terrible enough.

For there is no greater distress and calamity than when God sends us sects and false spirits, because they are so impudent and daringly bold, that they are really to be pitied. On the other hand the Word of God is such a great treasure, that no one can sufficiently comprehend its worth. For God himself considers his treasure immensely great, and when he visits us with his grace, he earnestly desires that we should gladly and freely accept it, and does not compel us as he is able to do, but it is his will that we should gladly obey it from choice and love. For he does not wait until we come to him, but he comes first to us. He comes into the world, becomes man, serves us, dies for us, rises again from the dead, sends us his Holy Spirit, gives us his Word, and opens heaven so wide that all men can enter; besides he gives us rich promises and assurances that he will care for us in time and in eternity, here and there, and pours out into our bosoms all the fullness of his grace. Therefore the acceptable time of grace is now at hand.

Yet, we neglect it, and cast it to the winds, so that he will not and cannot give it to us.

14. For when we fall and sin in other ways, he can better spare us and be lenient, he of course will spare us and forgive; but when we despise his Word, it calls for punishment, and he will also punish us, even if he delays a hundred years. But he will not wait that long. And the clearer the Word is preached the greater the punishment will be. I fear it will be the destruction of all Germany. Would to God I were a false prophet in this matter. Yet it will most certainly take place. God cannot permit this shameful disregard of his Word to go unpunished, nor will he wait long, for the Gospel is so abundantly proclaimed that it has never been as plainly and clearly taught since the days of the Apostles, as it is at present. God be praised! Hence it applies to Germany, as I fear it will be destroyed, unless we act differently.

15. We, who have heard the Gospel for a long time, ought earnestly to pray God that he continue to grant us peace. The princes and officers want to settle everything with the sword, and too impudently interfere with God’s office, until God himself shall smite them down. So it is high time faithfully to beseech God to permit his Gospel to be further spread through Germany, to those who have not yet heard it. For if the punishment came suddenly upon us, all will be lost, and many souls will be taken before the Gospel comes to them. Therefore I wish that we would not so terribly despise the Gospel, the costly treasure, not only for our own sakes, but also for the sake of those who have not yet heard it. It has become a little quiet, God grant that it may so continue, and that both the princes and the citizens may become more sane; for if it should begin afresh, I fear it would have no end.

16. But we act just like the Jews, who cared more for the belly than for God. They were more concerned how to fill their stomachs than how to be saved. For this reason they have lost both, and have been served just right.

Because they would not accept eternal life and peace, God took their bodily life, so that they have lost both body and soul. They also immediately put forth the excuse, just as our own people do to-day. We would of course gladly accept the Gospel, if it would not place our bodies and property in jeopardy, and if thereby we would not hazzard the loss of our wives and children. For the Jews said, if we believe in him, the Romans will come and take away both our place and nation, John 11:48. As nothing will happen sooner than what the wicked fear, as Solomon says, Proverbs 10:24: “The fear of the wicked, it shall come upon him.”

This prevented the Jews to believe God, and they did not consider the great and rich promises God bestowed upon them. So we also pass them by, and are not aware of the all powerful and comfortable promises Christ gives when he says, Matthew 19:29: Ye shall receive a hundredfold here, and there ye shall inherit eternal life. Let wife and child go, I will care for them, and restore them again to you. Only courageously trust in me. [Do you not think that I can build you another house? Do you regard me as being a hard man’: Yet I will give you heaven; will you not risk it on my Word?] If you are robbed of your treasures, blessed are ye, heaven and earth are mine, I will reward you a hundredfold.

17. We pass over these and many like passages, and besides despise them, and depend only on what we have in our banks, and how we may keep our purses filled, and do not consider that God has also given us what we have, and will still give us more; nor do we consider that when wo lose Clod, the stomach will also be lost. Therefore we are served just right in losing both the creator and the creature besides.

18. But believers in God risk all in him and transfer all things into his care, for him to do according to his pleasure, and think thus: God has given you your home and wife, you have not produced them yourself; now because they are God’s, I will entrust them all to his care, he will keep them from all harm. I must otherwise leave all at any rate, therefore I will bravely trust him with them, and for his sake give up all I have. If God wants me here, he will give me other treasures, for he has promised to give enough for this life and for the life to come. If he does not want me here, I owe him a death, which will bring me into eternal life; when he calls me, I will go trusting in his Word.

19. Whoever is not thus disposed, denies God, and must at the same time lose both, the present and the eternal life. The belly with its foul odors is our God, and prevents us from clinging to God’s Word. First, I will be certain how I shall feed, and where my supplies are. The Gospel says:

Trust in God; and your stomach shall most certainly be provided for, and have enough [without believing or trusting in it]. But if I have only five dollars they give me so much courage to think I have anyhow enough food for ten days, that I trust in such limited provisions, and do not trust God who fed me hitherto, that he will care for me to-morrow.

20. Is it not a shameful vexation or calamity that I trust in a penny that I will have something to eat to-morrow? How contemptible this carcass!

Shall a penny have more weight in my heart and give me more courage than God himself, who holds heaven and earth in his power, who gives us the air we breathe and the water we drink, who makes our corn to grow and gives us all things? It is so scandalous that it cannot be uttered, that God should not amount to as much with us as a hundred guilders. Why not think that God, who has created me, will surely feed me, if he wants me to live? If he does not want this, very well, I shall be satisfied.

21. Yes, says the stomach, I find no God in my chest! You silly donkey, who assures you that you will live tomorrow? You are not certain whether you will have a belly to-morrow, and you want to know where to find the bread and the food! Yes, you have a fine assurance! When our hearts are thus prompted, we see what a government of hell there would be on earth; yes, it would be the devil himself. Is it not a thing most abominable, that God who feeds so ninny mouths, should be held in such low esteem by me, that I will not trust him to feed me? Yea, that a guilder, thirty-eight cents, should be valued more highly than God, who pours out his treasures everywhere in rich profusion. For the world is full of God and his works, He is everywhere present with his gifts, and yet we will not trust in him, nor accept his visitation. Shame on thee, thou cursed world! What kind of a child is that, who cannot trust in God for a single day, but trusts in a guilder?

22. Now, I think, we see what the world is. how on account of the belly the world despises God, and yet must lose the belly together with body and soul. Oh, what godless people we are, and yet we are to spit upon or despise the world. If one would consider that he is such a godless wretch, that he cannot trust in God, he would not wish to live. Only choke away; for as captives we stick too deeply in the old Adam. The world is hell in prospect, yea, the real kingdom of Satan, a court yard in hell, except that the body is still here, otherwise it is true hell.

23. For this reason Christ admonishes us with tears to know our salvation and accept his visitation, that the calamity may not follow, which will surely come upon those who do not accept it, who are secure, until swift and sudden destruction comes upon them. May God give us grace, that we may know ourselves! The Gospel further reads: “And he entered into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold, saying unto them: It is written, And my hoarse shall be a house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of robbers.”

PART 2. THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE.

24. This is the second part of our Gospel, where the Lord takes hold of matters in earnest with his powerful hand, when he goes into the temple and casts out those who bought and sold there. For the first part was nothing but an admonition and incentive unto faith. Here the Lord now tells us what the temple of God is, and quotes passages from the Scriptures, and especially from the prophet Isaiah, 56:7, where God says: “For my house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples.” You, however, have made it a house of merchandise. This is a strong passage which the prophet utters: “for all peoples, for all Gentiles,” is against the Jews, who trusted in the temple of God at Jerusalem, and thought that this material house in Jerusalem would stand forever, and that it was impossible for God to demolish this temple or destroy this city. The Word of God does not lie. For this reason they also murdered Stephen, because he spoke against that holy place and said, Acts 6:14: “Jesus shall destroy this place, and shall change the customs which Moses delivered unto us.” And they said: have not the prophets praised this house, and Christ himself says here, that it is a house of prayer, and you Apostles say, he will destroy it.

25. But we must rightly understand this expression, that the city of Jerusalem, the temple and the people, should remain until the time of Christ. With this agree all the prophets, who have given all things into the hands of Christ; as he would then dispose of it, so it should be and remain.

Hence the passage in Isaiah goes no further than unto the times of Christ, as also all the prophets say, that after that there shall come a kingdom extending over the whole world, as in Malachi 1:10-11 we read: “For from the rising of the sun unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering; for my name shall be great among the Gentiles, saith Jehovah of hosts.” Here the prophet speaks of the spiritual kingdom of Christ, who shall build himself a house of prayer as extensive as the whole world.

26. It is true that God himself has established the temple at Jerusalem, not because it consisted of beautiful stones and costly buildings, or because it was consecrated by bishops, as at present men employ such foolery and juggling tricks; but God himself had consecrated and sanctified it with his Word, when he said: This house is my house: for his Word was preached in it. Now, wherever God’s Word is preached, there is God’s own true house, there God most certainly dwells with his grace. Wherever his Gospel is, there is a house of prayer, there men shall and may truly pray, and God will also hear their prayer, as Christ in John 16:23-24 says: “If ye shall ask anything of the Father, he will give it you in my name. Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name; ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be made full.” Here again, where the Word is not found, there the devil has full sway.

27. That we have imitated the Jews and built so many churches, would be well enough, if we had done it in order that the Word of God might be preached there; for where the Word goes there God is present, and looks down from heaven and pours out his grace. Therefore he says to the Jews here: I will not that you should make out of my house a den of robbers. For there were money changers in it who sold sheep and oxen, that strangers might buy them for their offerings in divine service. Why then does he call it a den of robbers? Surely, he gives it a scandalous name. He does it however because they no longer appreciate the house as the house of God, but as a market house; that is, the priests did not inquire how the Word of God was preached in it, although they sang, they babbled and read the prophets and Moses; but God cares nothing for such a murmuring of Psalms; that belongs to children.

28. They did just as our priests and monks do now, who have also made dens of robbers of our churches and cloisters, and have preached poison, and held masses only that the people might give them money and presents for holding them that they might thus fill their stomachs. They made the church a market house, in which they carried on their idle talk, corrupted and destroyed the sheep of God’s pastures by their scandalous false doctrine, that it may well be called a robber’s den for the soul. This title we should write on all churches in which the Gospel is not preached, for there they mock God, destroy souls, banish the pure Word and establish dens of murder; for he who listens to their words must die. Oh, how shamefully we have been deceived! Now, however, we should praise God, that this Word again brings us life, drives out the murderers, and teaches us how to pray aright; for an honest heart must pray, not with the mouth, but with the heart.

THE CONCLUSION.

29. Thus we have heard the second part of our Gospel, how Christ drove out the merchants that pandered to base appetites, and made room for his Word. It would be a good thing, in this same way to cleanse our cloisters, and turn them into schools or preaching places; if this is not done they will be and continue to be nothing but dens of robbers; for if Christ calls Iris own house a den of robbers, how much more will our churches and temples, not consecrated by God, be called dens of robbers?

30. I have often requested you to pray God to turn his wrath and restrain the devil now in the world. For you have undoubtedly heard of the great calamity, how many have been slain in the insurrection. We fear they have all been lost, for God requires obedience, and has himself pronounced the sentence, Matthew 26:52: “For all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.” The devil has taken possession of the world, who knows when our turn will come. Therefore let us pray that God’s kingdom may come and Christians may be multiplied, that he send wise and intelligent ministers to care for the people and listen to their wants, he who knows the gift of God prays for others who have not yet heard the Word, it is high time to do so. [Pray the Lord’s Prayer.] 31. Well, wherever this calamity begins and prevails, that the people maliciously despise the day God visits us with his Word and grace, for the sake of the belly and a little temporal benefit and advantage; there must follow as a consequence of such treatment the final punishment and wrath of God, who will utterly destroy them, remove the foundation of their trust, and overthrow the country and the people, so that both temporal and eternal interests go down together. For how shall he otherwise treat us, because of our scandalous ingratitude for his great love and mercy which he publicly declared unto us by his gracious visitation? How shall or can he do more for us, while we with wantonness and defiance spurn his help, and ever struggle and strive after wrath and destruction? For if those are not free of punishment who transgress the law and sin against the ten commandments; how much less will he permit those to go unpunished, who blaspheme and despise the Gospel of his grace, seeing the law by far does not bring as many good things as the Gospel?

32. If we will not wish to enjoy this happy day which he gives us unto grace and our salvation, he can also instead permit us to see and experience nothing but the dark and terrible night of all affliction and misfortune. And since we will not hear this precious Word and the proclamation of peace, we will be forced to hear the devil’s cry of murder ring in our ears from every direction. Now is the time for us to know the day, and well employ the rich and golden year, while the annual fair is before our very doors, and acknowledge that he has severely punished us. If we neglect it and allow it to pass, we can never hope for a better day or expect any peace; for the Lord, who is the Lord of peace, will be with us no longer.

33. But if Christ be no longer with us, our hope will vanish; and wherever this beloved guest is rejected, and his Christians no longer tolerated, government, peace and everything shall perish, for he too desires to eat with us, to rule and to provide bountifully. However, he desires also to be known as such a Lord, in order that we may be thankful to him, and also permit this guest and his Christians to eat with us, and give him his due tribute; if not, we will then be forced to give it to another, who will so thank and reward us for it, that we shall not be able to retain a bite of bread or a penny in peace. But the world will not believe this, just as the Jews also would not believe it, until they experienced it, and faith came to their assistance. For God has ordained, that this Christ shall be Lord and King upon the earth, under whose feet he has put all things, and whoever would have peace and good days, must be kind and obedient to him, or he will be dashed to pieces like a potter’s vessel. Psalm 2:9.

THE SECOND PART OF THIS GOSPEL.

“And he entered into the temple, and began to cast out those that sold, saying unto them: It is written, And my house shall be a house of prayer, but ye have made it a den of robbers.”

34. Here he shows the aim of his great activity, and what concerns him most of all, which was also the cause of his weeping. It is indeed a terrible history, that he who so recently wept out of great sympathy and compassion, so soon can change and come forth in great anger, (for our beloved Lord burns with great devotion and zeal), and goes into the temple as in a storm, and strikes with his uplifted arm as the Lord of the temple, of course with an excellent and warm spirit by which he is moved, beholding the chief cause of distress and the destruction, of which he spoke and over which he wept; namely, that the chief government, which should be God’s own and be called his temple, is all perverted and desolate, God’s Word and true worship entirely suppressed and corrupted, even by those who would be leaders and teachers of the people, on account of their disgraceful greed and their own glory. He would say by this: Yes, it is this, that . will completely bring on the calamity, and make an end of everything among this people.

35. Therefore, as merciful and compassionate as he showed himself to be to the poor multitude of people who are so wretchedly misled to their destruction; so great was the anger he showed against those who are the cause of this destruction. Otherwise he did not often resort to physical force and cause an uproar, as he does here, so that it is a strange act for an excellent and kind man, so full of love. But the cause of it is the great and powerful zeal and fervency of Spirit, which sees whence all affliction and sorrow come, namely, because the true worship of God is abolished and the name of God is so blasphemed that it is used merely for a show.

36. For the temple and the whole priesthood were or-dained for the purpose of enforcing God’s Word, to praise his grace and mercy, etc. ; and to testify to this and thank him for his Word by an external worship of offerings. However, they did not teach praise and thanksgiving to God, but instead they perverted it into the doctrine of monks and works, so that with such offerings one merited the grace of God, and if they only offered a great deal, God would give them heaven and every good thing on earth.

And hence they built their hopes for everything, which they ought to look for out of pure grace and mercy of God, on their own works and merits.

And besides they were misled so far in the devil’s name, that their avarice set up there in the temple tables for bankers and counters for traders in doves and all kinds of cattle used for offerings, so that those coming from distant lands and cities could find enough there to purchase, or if they had no money, they might barter for or borrow it, so that there might by all means be as many and as great offerings as possible.

Thus under the name of divine worship the true worship of God was overthrown and rooted out; and they substituted for God’s grace and goodness their own merits, and for his free gift their own works, which he was obliged to accept from us and thank us for them, and allow himself to be treated as an idol, compelled to do what pleases us, be angry or laugh, just as we wish it; and besides satiate their outrageous greed, by such idolatrous . doings, and without any sense of shame carry on a public annual fair.

37. Just as our Pope’s crowd, priests and monks, also did, who taught nothing but to trust in human works, and on this doctrine constructed everything in their church government, So that the people are compelled to purchase these things from them, who thus established a daily public fair over the whole world. And nothing was omitted that could be made to serve their greed, and for money they sold God, Christ, the Sacrament of the mass, absolution, and forgiveness of sins, the losing and binding key.

And. to this must be added their own invented human nonsense, which they pretend is divine worship, such as the brotherhood of monks, and their own superfluous merits; yea, even to put upon the dead a monk’s hood and cords; likewise the bishop’s and priest’s nasty oil, all kinds of bones of the dead which they call holy, letters of indulgence to eat butter, married women, children of priests and the like. All this had to bring and yield them money daily.

38. And especially the great rat king at Rome with his Judas purse, which is the great money gulch that in the name of Christ and the church has appropriated to itself all the possessions of the world. For he has reserved unto himself the power to forbid whatever he pleased and again to allow it for money, even to take and give kingdoms, whenever and as often as he pleased, and taxed lords and kings as it suited him.

This is a much more infamous and barefaced perversion of the temple of God into a house of merchandise, than was perpetrated by the Jews at Jerusalem. For it belonged to Antichrist, as is prophesied of him, to levy and collect for himself the treasures of the world; and St. Peter. speaking of such a hoard in 2 Peter 2:3 says: “And in covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose sentence now from of old lingereth not, and their destruction slumbereth not.”

39. Therefore Christ is justly angry at such desecration of his temple by these bloated misers, who do not only despise and forsake the true worship of God, but also pervert it and trample it under their feet. And thus they truly make out of the temple which God ordained for the purpose of teaching the people the Word of God and guiding them to heaven, nothing but a den of robbers, where nothing but the destruction and the murder of immortal souls take place, because they silence God’s Word, through which alone souls can be saved, and instead they are fed on the devil’s lies, etc.

This is truly the chief sin and principal cause, why the Jews with their temple and all they had, deserved to’ go to destruction and ruin. For, as they destroyed the kingdom of God itself, he will no longer build up their kingdom for them. Wherefore he says: Because you go to work, and instead of my kingdom you build the kingdom of Satan, so will I also work against you, and will destroy everything utterly, that I have built for you.

This is an example he began to do on that very day when he rushed among them in the temple, as his last public act before his death, which after his departure the Romans would effectually complete; namely, they with all they had would be totally swept away, as he cleanses his temple of them, that they may no more possess either their worship, temple nor priesthood, country or people.

40. He has, God be praised, even commenced to overthrow our idols and spectres, and Popery’s abominable merchandise of perfidy, and to purify his churches through the Gospel, also as a prelude, that it may be seen that he will also make an end of them, as before our eyes they have already begun to fall, and they must daily fall more and more, and they will be much more horribly dashed to the earth and everlastingly destroyed, than the Jews were destroyed and exterminated, because theirs is still a much more shameful abomination. This shall first properly begin when the Gospel has departed on account of their disgraceful, horrible blasphemy; but it will finally come to an end on the last day and be completely and forever destroyed.

41. Let Germany, which, praise to God, now has the Gospel, beware, that she may not meet the same fate, as it already so strongly everywhere indicates she will. For we dare not think that the contempt and unthankfulness, which are gaining control among us as great as among the Jews, will remain unpunished. After that he will let the godless world complain and cry: If the Gospel had not come, such things would not have come upon us; just like the Jews at Jerusalem blamed all their calamities to the preaching of the Gospel, and they themselves at the risk of their own necks prophesied that if Christ with his Gospel should continue, the Romans would come and take away their place and nation. And afterward also, even the Romans blamed their destruction to this new God and new doctrine. Just as it is said at present, since the Gospel has appeared things have never been right.

42. And thus it will also go with the world; as its people despise and persecute God’s Word, and become so hardened and blinded, they will blame no one as the cause and merit of their destruction but the precious Gospel itself; which nevertheless alone preserves, thank God, what is still preserved; otherwise all things would long since lay in one common heap of ruins. And yet it must bear the blame for everything that the devil and his clans transact. Because people continue to blaspheme and will not recognize what our sins deserve and the grace and mercy which we have in the Gospel, God must thus repay such blasphemers, so that they become their own prophets, and for a double wickedness receive a double reward.

This premonition has already gone forth, except that it is yet withheld on account of the faithful few; just as he beforehand admonished the Jews by this example when he cast those that sold and bought out of the temple, and afterwards went into the temple himself and finally taught until the day of his death, and yet for a time withheld as long as he could, and afterwards by his Apostles until they would no longer tolerate them; so now we, who cleave to Christ, restrain punishment as long as we live; but when these too shall lay down their heads, then the world will realize what it once had.

Tenth Sunday after Trinity. Luke 19:41-48. Warning Over the Destruction of Jerusalem

$
0
0
Hagia Sophia -
one of the largest churches in the world is now a Muslim museum.

The Tenth Sunday after Trinity, 2013


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson


Bethany Lutheran Church, 10 AM Central Time


The Hymn # 202             Welcome Happy Morning                      4:28
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #267            If God Had Not Been   4:61

Compassionate Warning

The Communion Hymn # 305.5-9                       Soul, Adorn              4:23
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn # 657            Beautiful Savior                    4:24

KJV 1 Corinthians 12:1 Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have you ignorant. 2 Ye know that ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led. 3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost. 4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. 7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; 9 To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; 10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will.

KJV Luke 19:41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, 42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes. 43 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, 44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation. 45 And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; 46 Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves. 47 And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him, 48 And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.


Tenth Sunday After Trinity

Almighty and everlasting God, who by Thy Holy Ghost hast revealed unto us the gospel of Thy Son, Jesus Christ: We beseech Thee so to quicken our hearts that we may sincerely receive Thy word, and not make light of it, or hear it without fruit, as did Thy people, the unbelieving Jews, but that we may fear Thee and daily grow in faith in Thy mercy, and finally obtain eternal salvation, through Thy Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.


European churches are empty,
but Muslim mosques are full.


Compassionate Warning

KJV Luke 19:41 And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it, 42 Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.

Jesus knew what would happen to Him when He entered Jerusalem the last time. But He also knew what would happen to Jerusalem in the near future.
As Luther pointed out, some warnings express the anger of God. Other warnings show the compassion of God.

3. There are two methods of preaching against the despisers of God’s Word. The first is by threats, as Christ threatens them in Matthew 11:21-24: “Woe unto thee, Chorazin! woe unto thee Bethsaida! for if the mighty works had been done in Tyre and Sidon which were done in you, they would have repented long’ ago in sackcloth and ashes. But I say unto you, it shail be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for you. And thou, Capernaum (which was his own city, where he performed most of his mighty works), shalt thou be exalted unto heaven? thou shalt go down unto hell; for if the mighty works had been done in Sodom which were done in thee, it would have remained until this day. But I sos’ unto you that it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.” With these threatening words he would frighten them to their senses, and not to cast to the winds the Word which God sends them.

4. The other method the Lord gives here when he weeps, and shows his sympathy for the poor blinded people, and rebukes and threatens them, not as the hardened and stubbornly blind; but when he melts in love and compassion over his enemies, and with great heart-rending pity and cries, he tells them what shall befall them, which he would gladly prevent, but all is in vain. In the passage just quoted, Matthew 11:21-24, where he rebukes them, he does not treat them in love, but in the severity of faith.

However here, it is all sincere love and mercy. This is worthy of our consideration.

Here we can see how compassionate Jesus was, even though Jerusalem was deserving of the dire circumstances to come. Jesus wept over the city, just as He wept over the grave of His good friend Lazarus.

The misunderstanding of Judaism led to their rejection of Christ, because He taught faith in Him rather than faith in their own righteousness. The same kind of misunderstanding led to them fighting the Roman army.

The war with Rome began with a battle the Jews won, but there is a difference between a garrison (a small group of soldiers) and the might of the Roman Empire. The Empire struck back. Their doctrine was simple – we never lose a war. They only lost to the Germans when Arminius the Hun (aka Herman the German) used guerilla tactics against them and wiped out an entire legion, about 20,000 men. But that was another time.

Jerusalem was especially easy to defend, with its high walls up against a mountain and its own supply of fresh water. However, the Romans had a plan for such cities. They brought along slaves and used their army to build an wall around the city walls, locking in the citizens and shutting off all food supplies.

The city was choked with pilgrims at this time, so the strain was especially high. This was only 40 years after the death and resurrection of Christ, and only a few years after the Christian church in Jerusalem was persecuted. The Christians fled early and escaped this terrible event.

43 For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,

They dug a trench and build a wall, so any escape was easy to detect and even easier to stop. The only remedy was an effective attack from outside the new Roman walls. But that did not happen.

When people panic over food, they panic. Every person wants to keep more than usual because of fear. And the strong rob the weak, making everyone even more terrified.

Food storage was burned down, which took away their security.

Horrible stories are recorded in Josephus about what happened. He was there and escaped to become a court historian for the Romans, and he wrote about this war.

I will not list the worst parts, except to say that cannibalism happened.

One story illustrates how bad it was. People boiled their leather shoe laces to have something to eat and bought bird droppings because of the salt content, to make their remaining food taste better.

44 And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

Some hid their money by swallowing it, so many people were cut open to look for the gold. There were rumors that gold was hidden in the Temple, so those stones were overturned to look for treasure there.

Later, there was a new rebellion, which made the city a ruin when it was put down by Roman forces. It was led by a man who claimed to be the Messiah, about 120 years after they rejected the real Messiah.

45 And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein, and them that bought; 46 Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves. 47 And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him, 48 And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him.

The end of this lesson reminds us of the greed that destroyed the city, a greed that existed when everything seemed peaceful but was not.

The Temple courtyard area had been turned into an outdoor mall based on religion, not unlike the typical Lutheran narthex today, where insurance is promoted on posters, napkins, and flower charts.

Greed united with religion was already destroying Jerusalem before greed united with military might leveled the holy place. It was said, even by the Romans, that no one could have conquered that city, if God had not intervened.

The soldiers looted the city because that was their reward for the hardships they endured. Although many residents died, the captives were so great in number that they were sold into slavery and shipped away so the price would be a little better.

All these horrible events came from self-righteousness and lack of faith.

We can apply this lesson to America and the West, because we have brought the same calamities upon ourselves by lack of faith and greed.

First we let a tiny faction turn unborn life into some kind of crime that must be punished with death.

The same pro-abortion factions turned marriage upside-down.

Turning God’s laws around can only bring bad results.



APPLICATION TO GERMANY.

11. Here let us learn a lesson, for this concerns us, not us alone who are here present, but the whole country of Germany. It is not a mere jest, nor should we think that it will go different with us. The Jews would not believe until they experienced it and became conscious of it. God has now also visited us, and has opened the precious treasures of his holy Gospel unto us, by which we can learn God’s will, and see how we were held by the power of the devil. Yet no one will earnestly believe it, yea, we much more despise it and make light of it. No city, no officer of the government is thankful for the Gospel; and what is still worse the great majority persecute and blaspheme it. God has great patience; he waits to see how we will deal with his Gospel; but when we once let the opportunity slip, he will take his Word from us, and then the wrath which consumed the Jews will also con-st, me us. For it is one and the selfsame Word, the very same God, and the identical Christ, the Jews themselves had; therefore the punishment in body and soul will also most certainly be the same. [We, of course, regard it as mockery, and care nothing for it. This is only an evidence of our own blindness. We ought to perceive that God is hardening us; for there is not a single city that is concerned about it; no officer of the law shows any zeal in its favor. It is most deplorable.] And I fear the time will yet come when Germany will lay in a heap of ruins. The evil winds have already begun to blow destruction in our peasant war. We have already lost many people. Nearly one hundred thousand men, only between Easter and Pentecost! It is an awful work of God, and I fear it will not stop at this. It is only a foretaste of a threat to frighten us, that we may prepare ourselves for the coming ordeal. So far it is but a fox’s tail, but God will soon come with a terrible scourge, and lash us to pieces.

And this happened with the Thirty Years War, not too long after Luther wrote this.



Tenth Sunday after Trinty
Sound Doctrine and Baptism

"This epistle selection treats of spiritual things, thing which chiefly pertain to the office of the ministry and concern the Church authorities. Paul instructs how those in office should employ their gifts for the benefit of one another and thus further the unity and advancement of the Churches."               Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 197f.

"Whenever the Word of God has a foothold, there the devil will be. By the agency of his factions he will always build his taverns and kitchens beside God's house. So he did at first, in Paradise. In the family of Adam he entrenched himself, establishing there his church." Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 198. "But dissensions, sects and divisions are sure signs that the true doctrine is either ignored or misunderstood, men thus being left in a condition to be 'tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine,' as Paul says (Ephesians 4:4); which is indisputably the case with these same schismatics who condemn the Church and her doctrines because of some discordant ones."              Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 204.         

"Thus Paul rejects the glorying and boasting of the sects over their offices and gifts--they who pretend to be filled with the Spirit and to teach the people correctly, and who make out that Paul and other teachers are of no consequence...MOre than that, they demand a higher attainment in the Spirit for Gospel ministers, deeming faith, the Sacrament, and the outward office not sufficient."            
Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 206.       

"You are either reproaching and cursing Jesus, or praising him and owning him your Lord. If your preaching and teaching fail to point to Christ, something else being offered, and you nevertheless boast of the Spirit, you are already judged: the spirit you boast is not the Holy Spirit, not the true Spirit, but a false one. To it we are not to listen. Rather we are condemn it to the abyss of hell, as Paul declares, (Galatians 1:8), saying: 'But though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach unto you any Gospel other than that which we preached unto you, let him be anathema [damned to Hell].'" 
            Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 206.      

"The same is true of other factions--the Anabaptists and similar sects. What else do they but slander baptism and the Lord's Supper when they pretend that the external [spoken] Word and outward sacraments do not benefit the soul, that the Spirit alone can do that?" Martin Luther, Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 208. "Flesh and blood are too weak to obtain this glorious confidence; the Holy Spirit is essential. Reason and our own hearts cry out in protest: 'Alas, I am far too evil and unworthy! How could I be proud and presumptuous enough to boast myself the servant of the Lord Jesus Christ?"
            Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 210.

"The gift of prophecy is the ability to rightly interpret and explain the Scriptures, and powerfully to reveal therefrom the doctrine of faith and the overthrow of false doctrine. The gift of prophecy includes, further, the ability to employ the Scriptures for admonition and reproof, for imparting strength and comfort, by pointing out, on the one hand, the certainty of future indignation, vengeance and punishment for the unbelieving and disobedient, and on the other hand presenting divine aid and reward to godly believers. Thus did the prophets with the Word of God, both the Law and the promises."
            Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 213.      

"Christians, however, though obliged to live among swine and to be at times trampled under foot and rooted about, have nevertheless surpassing glory; for they can look up and intelligently behold their Lord and His gifts."
            Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 217. 

"But the discerning Christian can with satisfaction boast on this wise: 'My baptism or my absolution is not of my own devising or ordaining, nor of another man's. It is of Christ my Lord."     Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 219. 

"His gifts and works in His Church must effect inexpressible results, taking souls from the jaws of the devil and translating them into eternal life and glory."
            Sermons of Martin Luther, ed. John Nicolas Lenker, Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1983, VIII, p. 220. 

Church Growth Spiritual Gifts
"People Person: Have been recognized as a counselor and mediator. Brought harmony to what was once described as 'the most troubled Lutheran church in America. Personal: Born, December 6, 1941, Columbus. Married, three children. Spiritual gifts: Exhortation, teaching, administration and evangelism.
            Floyd Luther Stolzenburg 2904 Maryland Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43209-1157 614-235-5200 

"Recognizing the need for professional church growth consultation, in 1975 he [C. Peter Wagner] invited John Wimber to become the founding director of what is now the Charles E. Fuller Institute of Evangelism and Church Growth. Wimber got the Institute off to an excellent start, then left to become the founding pastor of Vineyard Christian Fellowship of Anaheim and Vineyard Ministries Internamtion... Your Spiritual Gifts Can Help Your Church Grow (Regal, 1979) is approaching the 100,000 mark... Church Growth and the Whole Gospel (Harper and Row, 1981) is a scholarly discussion of criticisms of the Church Growth Movement from the viewpoint of social ethics, in which Wagner did his doctoral work."
            C. Peter Wagner, ed., with Win Arn and Elmer Towns, Church Growth: The State of the Art, Wheaton: Tyndale House, 1986, p. 271f.    

"Pastors and lay persons trained in Church Growth are leading Christians to discover their spiritual gifts. They are looking into the Scripture and discovering those verses in Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12, and Ephesians 4 where some of the gifts are listed." [See C. Peter Wagner, Your Spiritual Gifts Can Help Your Church Grow, 1979, "a discussion of gifts which relates specifically to the potential of mobilizing God's people for church growth," p. 33.]
            Kent R. Hunter, Launching Growth in the Local Congregation, A Workbook for Focusing Church Growth Eyes, Detroit: Church Growth Analysis and Learning Center, 1980, p. 26.   










Hymns from the Recently Stolen Church - St. John in Milwaukee

$
0
0
Born: May 7, 1889, Mil­wau­kee, Wis­con­sin.
Died: Au­gust 2, 1941, Mil­wau­kee, Wis­con­sin.
Leav­ing school af­ter eighth grade, Hoppe worked as a sten­o­graph­er in Mil­wau­kee, Wis­con­sin. She be­gan writ­ing pa­tri­o­tic vers­es in ear­ly child­hood; by age 25 she was writ­ing spir­it­u­al po­e­try. Some of her po­ems ap­peared in the Northwestern Lu­ther­an, a per­i­od­i­cal of the Wis­con­sin Evan­gel­ic­al Lu­ther­an Sy­nod, of which she was a mem­ber. These came to the at­ten­tion of Dr. Adolf Hult of Au­gus­ta­na Sem­in­a­ry, Rock Is­land, Il­li­nois, who in­flu­enced her to write her Songs for the Church Year (1928). Sev­er­al hymn­als in­clud­ed her work, which was usu­al­ly set to tra­di­tion­al chor­ale mel­o­dies, al­though she al­so made a num­ber of trans­la­tions. Hoppe said of her work:
Ma­ny of my hymns have been writ­ten on my way to and from church and to and from work. I util­ize my lunch hours for typ­ing the hymns and keep­ing up cor­res­pondence…still I find a min­ute here and there in which to jot down some verse.

---

Daryl Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Luther's Sermon for the Tenth Sunday after Trinity...":

I can never read this text without thinking of the beautiful hymn by Anna Hoppe, "O'er Jerusalem Thou Weepest", TLH 419, wedded to an equally beautiful tune. Miss Hoppe was a life-long member of St. John's, Eighth & Vliet, Milwaukee, baptized and confirmed by Johannes Bading, buried 52 years later by John Brenner. She was a voluminous author and translator, having written at least one hymn for every Sunday and festival of the Church Year. Many more of her hymns appear in the Augustana Synod hymnal of 1925. All this with an office job and little more than an eighth grade education.

"O'er Jerusalem Thou Weepest"
by Anna Hoppe, 1889-1941
1. O'er Jerusalem Thou weepest
In compassion, dearest Lord.
Love divine, of love the deepest,
O'er Thine erring Israel poured,
Crieth out in bitter moan:
"O loved city, hadst thou known
This thy day of visitation,
Thou wouldst not reject salvation."

2. By the love Thy tears are telling,
O Thou Lamb for sinners slain,
Make my heart Thy temple-dwelling,
Purged from every guilty stain.
Oh, forgive, forgive, my sin!
Cleanse me, cleanse me, Lord, within!
I am Thine since Thou hast sought me,
Since Thy precious blood hath bought me.

3. O Thou Lord of my salvation,
Grant my soul Thy blood-bought peace.
By Thy tears of lamentation
Bid my faith and love increase.
Grant me grace to love Thy Word,
Grace to keep the message heard,
Grace to own Thee as my Treasure,
Grace to love Thee without measure.

Hymn #419
The Lutheran Hymnal
Text: Luke 19:41
Author: Anna Hoppe, 1919, alt.
Tune:"Freu dich sehr" (Comfort, comfort, ye my people)
1st Published in: Genevan Psalter, 1551


WELS kicked their mother church out of the synod.

Recently two WELS pastors worked secretly to steal the congregation
and its endowment fund.

What I Learned at the WELS Convention - People Are Afraid of the Bible!

The Fix Was Already In for the New NIV, But Now WELS Has Approved ALL Translations.Take Advantage, WELSians!

$
0
0


As I understand it, the WELS convention blessed all translations and did not condemn any of them. That would make it easy for President Schroeder to apologize to those who were kicked out of WELS for favoring the KJV.

WELS is rapidly coming around to my position. They are advocating online worship services, and some are actually opening up the Book of Concord.

Some may return to the KJV now, which is what I have used with advantages for decades.

Several people asked me why WELS never had any use for the New KJV, which is favored in the Little Sect on the Prairie. The old NIV was ideal for burying the Means of Grace, and for preparing everyone for the New NIV. Using the New KJV would have implied the original was worth reading.

Silent Voices is one of many feminist projects. Readings from that version during the flag ceremony would have been appropriate.

The fix was in long ago for the New NIV, and Schroeder faded even more as a leader. He supposedly did not like the NNIV, but his public remarks were as mealy-mouthed as they come.

But the final vote has something for the WELSians to use with advantages. Of course the Changer organization will heavily promote the New NIV in the name of "choosing the best one to use," but no one has to buy it. All the boosterism from NPH will not sell a single copy of anything if congregations refuse to buy the material.

Moreover, they can flaunt their use of other translations. Glende and the rest of the Changers are not obliged to use the wretched hymnal or even their own sermons, so why should congregations buy NPH materials that are NIV and NNIV?

But I am making sense again, which is a sin.




That Is a Good Question, My Debt-Ridden Student

$
0
0
Become a Church Growth consultant, Mr. Bull.


RagingBull72 has left a new comment on your post "LCMS Seminary Cost Scandal: Fabulous Costs To Supp...":

I'm thinking of creative ways to incur a permanent disability after having graduated from CTSFW (without an M.Div) as it is the only way to have the $64K loans I needed to complete my incomplete education forgiven (I had $2k in loans from undergrad).

Given my occupational options with a Masters in Theology (Pretzel Maker at Mall or 3rd shifter at 7-11), paying off nearly $70K at 6.8% isn't a realistic expectation within the next 25 years -- although poverty is a current reality.

Oddly enough, I recall our student body being admonished not to take out more loans than necessary (how else are we going to pay over $20K a year in tuition and mandatory insurance?!) and felt as if we were being blamed for the high level of student debt incurred at seminary.

I was happy to hear when I inquired how might I serve the Church with my degree with the answer, "That's a good question."

Herbert Chilstrom: Gay acceptance and churches | Star Tribune

$
0
0
How is ELCA's universal justification
different from WELS and LCMS and ELS?


Herbert Chilstrom: Gay acceptance and churches | Star Tribune:

In 1987, I was elected the first presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), the fourth-largest Protestant denomination in the United States. By now the issue had bubbled up into a national crisis. Along with other denominations, the ELCA was seeking to develop a policy on gay ordination, gay marriage and related questions.

'via Blog this'

***

GJ - Lenski, "Resist the beginnings." ELCA did not, and they found themselves torn apart by the gay agenda.

I knew Chilstrom somewhat, ate lunch with him at a conference. He graduated from Augustana Seminary.

I wrote about the Lavender Mafia in 1987, providing proof of how this was organized across denominational lines. All the information was in print and easy to cite. Many people were incredulous. When I gave Robert Preus the materials handed out at LCA gatherings, he was in shock. Yet Missouri and WELS kept working with ELCA as if nothing had happened.

Now the SynCons cluck their tongues and point their fingers at ELCA, as if they have not been enablers for 26 plus years.

The Joy Radio show. What was that?

Snowbird Leadership Conference. Never happened.

Church (Growth) Membership Initiative. I was not there.

Etc.


Baby Chicks in Training at Mequon

Classic Ichabod - Mark Jeske Works UOJ into Classic Hymn - CW

$
0
0

Friday, August 10, 2012

Jeske Gets "Me" into His UOJ Stanza Three Times.
At Least It Rhymes.

Mark Jeske borrowed the Snooki bronzer from Glende,
the UOJ from Huber.


2138 has left a new comment on your post "Day of Wrath - The Lutheran Hymnal":

FYI: CW 209 has only 6 of these stanzas, with a newly created 7th stanza--

"On the cross your dying spared me;
Just and righteous you declared me;
I await the joy prepared me."

Author of stanza 7: Mark A. Jeske.



"Day of Wrath, O Day of Mourning"
by Thomas de Celano, 13th century
Translated by William J. Irons, 1812-1883

1. Day of wrath, O day of mourning!
See fulfilled the Prophet's warning,
Heaven and earth in ashes burning.

2. Oh, what fear man's bosom rendeth
When from heav'n the Judge descendeth
On whose sentence all dependeth!

3. Wondrous sound the trumpet flingeth,
Thro' earth's sepulchers it ringeth,
All before the throne it bringeth.

4. Death is struck and nature quaking;
All creation is awaking,
To its Judge an answer making.

5. Lo, the book, exactly worded,
Wherein all hath been recorded;
Thence shall judgment be awarded.

6. When the Judge His seat attaineth
And each hidden deed arraigneth,
Nothing unavenged remaineth.

7. What shall I, frail man, be pleading?
Who for me be interceding
When the just are mercy needing?

8. King of majesty tremendous,
Who dost free salvation send us,
Fount of pity, then befriend us.

9. Think, good Jesus, my salvation
Caused Thy wondrous incarnation;
Leave me not to reprobation!

10. Faint and weary Thou hast sought me,
On the cross of suffering bought me;
Shall such grace be vainly brought me?

11. Righteous Judge, for sin's pollution
Grant Thy gift of absolution
Ere that day of retribution!

12. Guilty, now I pour my moaning,
All my shame with anguish owning:
Spare, O God, Thy suppliant groaning!

13. From that sinful woman shriven,
From the dying thief forgiven,
Thou to me a hope hast given.

14. Worthless are my prayers and sighing;
Yet, good Lord, in grace complying,
Rescue me from fires undying.

15. With Thy favored sheep, oh, place me!
Nor among the goats abase me,
But to Thy right hand upraise me.

16. While the wicked are confounded,
Doomed to flames of woe unbounded,
Call me, with Thy saints surrounded.

17. Low I kneel with heart-submission,
See, like ashes, my contrition;
Help me in my last condition!

18. Day of sorrow, day of weeping,
When, in dust no longer sleeping,
Man awakes in Thy dread keeping!

19. To the rest Thou didst prepare me
On Thy cross; O Christ, upbear me!
Spare, O God, in mercy spare me!

Hymn #607
The Lutheran Hymnal
Text: Zephaniah 1:15, 16
Author: Thomas de Celano, c. 1250
Translated by: William J. Irons, 1848, alt.
Titled: "Dies irae, dies illa"
Tune: "Dies irae"
Latin melody, c. 1200


---

Brett Meyer has left a new comment on your post "Jeske Gets "Me" into His UOJ Stanza Three Times.At...":

Jeske leads the (W)ELS by the nose. (W)ELS should not only be judged by what they teach and practice but also by what they allow. It's significant when you consider what they accept in their fellowship.

Whatever Jeske believes and teaches about Heaven there is a significant part which isn't even Scriptural. Certainly heaping abuses against Christ by teaching the heinous false gospel of Universal Objective Justification (UOJ, General Justification) is ground zero for this Synod.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2008/12/jeske-thank-you-for-hiding-your.html 

***



GJ - Luther said that when the Means of Grace are denied, foul errors rush in. Jeske and his WELS/ELS/LCMS support prove that.

One big Jeske Church and Changer just got elevated to District Pope - Kudu Don Patterson. The district is buying future trouble on the installment plan - not that Glaeske did anything. Kudu Don will be pro-active, as they say.

Tell them about your drunken spiritual retreats, Don, where the ladies bet on who will be the first one to puke her guts out.

Some think Jack Schaap is crude. How about Mrs. White's crude act, with the ladies guffawing?

Only half of the photo is a Photoshop.
DP Patterson is so po' that he needs a free vicar each year,
but he hunts wild game in Africa.

4 comments:

Brett Meyer said...
Jeske leads the (W)ELS by the nose. (W)ELS should not only be judged by what they teach and practice but also by what they allow. It's significant when you consider what they accept in their fellowship.

Whatever Jeske believes and teaches about Heaven there is a significant part which isn't even Scriptural. Certainly heaping abuses against Christ by teaching the heinous false gospel of Universal Objective Justification (UOJ, General Justification) is ground zero for this Synod.

http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2008/12/jeske-thank-you-for-hiding-your.html
A. Berean said...
A citation from Martin Chemnitz:

"1 Timothy 2:6: "He gave Himself a ransom for all." Rom. 10:4: "Christ is the end of the Law that everyone who has faith may be justified." In Rom. 5:9, Paul says that we are justified through the blood of Christ. And in explanation of this he says that we are reconciled to God by the death of His Son. "For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by one man's obedience many will be made righteous (Rom. 5:19). But how? Paul answers in Rom. 4:5: "Because faith is reckoned for righteousness." Not because faith is in itself such a virtue but because it lays hold of ,accepts, embraces, and possesses Christ, who is the end of the Law for righteousness to everyone who believes. For this is the righteousness which God imputes without our works to whose who are made blessed."

Examination of the Council of Trent, Vol. 1 pg. 503. Translated by Fred Kramer. Published by CPH.
Brett Meyer said...
Father Spencer of the Intrepids continues has posted one of his outreach ads which is sure to tickle the enthusiastic UOJ crowd in the (W)ELS. His theme for these ads is “Getting Right to the Point.” But it is anything but that. His recent ad, “Jesus Is The Only Way To Heaven”, avoids the use of Scriptures word for violating God’s will, SIN. He uses the phrase “We don’t always do what God wants us to do” in exchange for SIN. His statement implies that we sometimes do what God wants us to do. But doing what God wants us to do isn’t the opposite of sin since anything done without faith in Christ is sin. Therefore this Intrepid leader soft peddles God’s teaching concerning sin and fails to get right to the point.
He then perverts the Gospel of Christ and promotes his version of Universal Objective Justification. Father Spencer closes his pronouncement of the gospel with “All God asks is that we believe this.” What is it that one needs to believe – moving to the beginning of the paragraph he provides the things to believe: 1) He (Christ) is the only human who has been perfect. 2) Christ freely gives the whole world His perfection 3) Christ has taken the blame for the whole worlds wrongs. The the false gospel of UOJ statement in this pronouncement is statement 2) that Christ freely gives the whole world His perfection – and if a person believes this he will be saved eternally. Scripture wars against the false gospel of UOJ when in John 8:24 Christ declares, “I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.” There is no imputation of perfection without faith in Christ. Many have entered the wide gate to Hell and therefore the whole world has not been given Christ’s perfection. So not only did Father Spencer not “get right to the point” he didn’t even “get the point right”.
Could Intrepid Father Spencer have written his statements differently in order to faithfully represent Christ’s Word, yes. But he does not see all of the heinous, Christ denying, problems with UOJ and therefore continues to teach it to the detriment of men, women and children in the (W)ELS and beyond. He once referred to UOJ as a tired, old, dead, rotting horse. The issue is that out of unbelief, ignorance or apathy the (W)ELS continues to force it’s members to feast upon it while anathematizing One Justification solely by Faith Alone.
The ad is then completed by deploying Methobapticostal enthusiastic declaration, “heaven is really the easiest club to get into! Don’t be left out!” Really?! Is it each individuals decision to “apply” for belief in this “membership card” (since Father Spencer is referring to Christ as the membership card he should have capitalized it – Membership Card). I contend that it is God who calls, gathers and enlightens those He will, Romans 8:30, “Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.” Romans 9:11, “(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)”. So it is not a matter of the unbelieving world deciding ‘not to be left out’, it is a matter of God calling, through the divinely established Means of Grace (Word and Sacrament) those He would to faith in Christ.
Perverse and wayward ways of teaching God’s pure Word are part and parcel of belonging to a false and heretical Church body which has as its primary membership obligation to speak and teach according to Synod regardless of its faithfulness and in this case lack of faithfulness to Scripture: Christ.

http://www.intrepidlutherans.com/2012/08/jesus-is-only-way-to-heaven.html
Brett Meyer said...
“You are the best seedbed that I know for evolving the church and the world in the 21st century.”
Barbara Marx Hubbard
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/08/10/as-nuns-meet-seattle-catholics-show-support/

"the words that New Age Leader Barbara Marx Hubbard was given by her New Age "Christ" - "Evolve or die"
Barbara Marx Hubbard
http://churchmousec.wordpress.com/tag/barbara-marx-hubbard/

"Change or Die!"
(W)ELS and LCMS Pastor Mark Jeske
Change or Die conference
http://siebertfoundation.org/pdfs/Change%20or%20Die%20Brochure%202011%20-%20FINAL%20EDITION.pdf

"Man must change or die: there is no other course."
New Age false prophet for the New World religion Maitreya as channeled by Benjamin Creme
http://www.share-international.org/maitreya/messages/message_81.htm

Classic Ichabod - Slavishly Following the Missionals or Emergents.Change or Die, As WELS and the Episcopalians Say

$
0
0


Wednesday, October 24, 2012


Brian McLaren and Andy Stanley - The Heroes of Emergent Church Growth -
Slavishly Followed by WELS, LCMS, ELS.
AKA Missional or Becoming Missional


McCained from Wikipedia:

I don’t believe making disciples must equal making adherents to the Christian religion. It may be advisable in many (not all!) circumstances to help people become followers of Jesus and remain within their Buddhist, Hindu or Jewish contexts … rather than resolving the paradox via pronouncements on the eternal destiny of people more convinced by or loyal to other religions than ours, we simply move on … To help Buddhists, Muslims, Christians, and everyone else experience life to the full in the way of Jesus (while learning it better myself), I would gladly become one of them (whoever they are), to whatever degree I can, to embrace them, to join them, to enter into their world without judgment but with saving love as mine has been entered by the Lord (A Generous Orthodoxy, 260, 262, 264).

And....

"Even if we are convinced that all homosexual behavior is always sinful, we still want to treat gay and lesbian people with more dignity, gentleness, and respect than our colleagues do. If we think that there may actually be a legitimate context for some homosexual relationships, we know that the biblical arguments are nuanced and multilayered, and the pastoral ramifications are staggeringly complex. We aren't sure if or where lines are to be drawn, nor do we know how to enforce with fairness whatever lines are drawn."

And...

"Our interpretations reveal less about God or the Bible than they do about ourselves. They reveal what we want to defend, what we want to attack, what we want to ignore, what we're unwilling to question..." (A New Kind of Christian, 50)

Remember Rob Bell, the apostate "evangelist" who rejected Christian doctrine in Love Wins? McLaren defended Rob Bell - and why not? - McLaren teaches the same Universalism while denying he is a Universalist!

More of McLaren's ravings are quoted here.

Sound familiar WELS fans?

The Church Growth Movement, which was centered at Fuller Seminary (training ground for most LCMS, WELS, ELCA, and ELS leaders) has morphed or metastasized into Emergent Church/Becoming Missional.

ELCA pastors probably put up more fuss about Church Growth than the other Lutheran groups put together. They cross-referenced each other, too. They left ELCA in disgust and joined the Church of Rome, which also uses Church Growth methods. Justice! Neuhaus is a prime example of hating Church Growth, saying some good things against it (Ad Fontes Conference, attended by the Ichabods), and joining Rome.

But WELS and Missouri "conservatives" said nothing and did nothing while heavily promoting Church Growth and participating with ELCA in Church Growth projects like the Thrivent Church Membership Initiative.

By emasculating themselves, the "conservative" clergy and laity left the field wide open for the next stage of Church Growth - Emergent Church under such leaders as McLaren, Andy Stanley, and Mark Driscoll.


Emergent Church/Missional Characteristics

  1. The parish avoids the denominational name and even the word "church" - as in The CORE, CrossWalk, CrossRoads.
  2. The clergypersons (including women pastors) dress like they are going to change the oil in their jalopy, as if they dug the clothes out of the hamper or the rag bin.
  3. No liturgy, sound hymns, or creeds in the service.
  4. The sermon is replaced by a rant - cussing is really cool and edgy.
  5. Music is loud, ecclesiatical rock.
  6. Lighting is modeled after rock concert extravaganzas.
  7. Doctrinal content is marketed as inclusive, but it is really covert Universalism, lacking the Law and making fun of faith (perfect for the UOJ Hive).
  8. Cell groups are essential, mandated, but sound doctrine is a burden, an obstacle.
  9. Pulpit views are consistently on the far Left on all social issues - in the name of love.

Andy Stanley and Ski - WELS The Core.
Ski, Tim Glende, and many other WELS disciples have attended Stanley worship conferences.
Gay activist Stanley has been a featured speaker at many Willow Creek conferences:
Missouri and WELS are deep into Willow Creek.
The Ichabods attended WC to observe and later to retch.
John Parlow is a WC disciple and Andy Stanley follower.

Ski posted his account of worship at the Drive conference for many years.
I copied most of it into this blog.
Here is what Stanley said about his gay outreach:
http://ichabodthegloryhasdeparted.blogspot.com/2012/05/mentor-to-ski-glende-parlow-buske-and.html
Kelmed from Ichabod at this link:


WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW:
WHO WENT THAT YOU MIGHT KNOW?
Pastor Ski - St. Marcus - Milwaukee
Pastor John Parlow - St. Mark - Depere
HOW LONG WERE WE THERE?
WHERE WAS THE CONFERENCE?
FAVORITE PART OF THE CONFERENCE:
FAVORITE BREAK OUT SESSION:
A Healthy Staff Culture
- Jeff Henderson
FAVORITE QUOTE FROM DRIVE ‘08
“Leaders don’t get people, they attract them”
- Andy Stanley

DRIVE ’08 JOURNAL

Whew!  Day 5, it has been a heck of a road trip.  Today was the last day.  As you can see it was jam packed.  Before I get into Day 5... Let me just say this, “We should have sat in traffic to go to the Brown Bridge Campus!”  Buske & I were bitter.  Remember that I had said John got frustrated sitting the parking lot for 30 minutes?  So we went to dinner & called it a night.  Well, on Day 5 they showed the video for what happened at Brown Bridge.  Sweet cookout, the food looked awesome, games and fellowship outside (without snow or cold, I might add) and then a surprise JEFF FOXWORTHY show.  Man, how are they gonna top that next year?

Anyway, Day 5.  It is kind of crazy, just when you think it can’t get any better, it does.  Well, sort of.  In the morning they had Q & As for different groups.  I went to one that was about linking adults into small group studies.  It was well done, but for me it is difficult because everyone is looking for concrete answers on how to solve their own personal small group issues.  Many of the questions didn’t apply for us at St. Marcus.  However, the leaders were great and had a ton of info.
My final breakout session was entitled Parental Guidance Required.  The leader was Clay Scroggins.  He kind of looked like Steve James (he’s a St. Marcus member, Steve that is) but he talked with a Texas drawl.  He was high energy.  Based on his presentation and his passion for kids, I imagine that he rocked it out with kids.  The gist of his session was that what happens in the home has a greater influence on the spiritual life of children than what happens at church.  Based on that it becomes imperative that parents & the church partner.  Here are the steps that North Point uses:
  1. 1.Inform Parents - inform them about what is being taught to their children.
  2. 2.Partner With Parents - invite parents to be in an environment with their children.
  3. 3.Equip Parents - provide parents with the tools to assist in the spiritual development of their children.
Pretty good points and a really good session.  
After that session we broke for lunch.  John took off for the airport, so Buske and I were on our own.  That might sound a little scary, but it is true.
The final Main Session with Andy Stanley was just phenomenal.  We began with awesome worship.  Today though, they began with a Christian rapper, Toby Mac.  Our school kids would have loved it.  I’m not sure that they would have believed that it was church though.
When Andy began his session.  He started by saying that he was not going to follow his notes in the Drive ’08 Journal Book.  Instead he was going to do something that he called, “Recent Random Thoughts On Church Leadership.”  He shared 5 points and 5 takeaways.  I think that he was at his absolute best this afternoon.  Here are the 5 point & takeaways:
  1. 1.To reach people no one else is reaching we must do things no one else is doing.
Takeaway - Become preoccupied with those you haven’t reached as opposed to those you keep.  This is easier said than done.
Wow, it seems so simple.  And yet so hard.
  1. 2.The next generation product almost never comes from the previous generation.
Takeaway - Be a student not a critic.
What more can be said?  How do we approach things?  When things are different & involve change are we scared?  Do we criticize or do we look to learn and implement?
  1. 3.What do I believe is impossible to do in my field?  But if it could be done it would fundamentally change my business.
Takeaway - Pay attention to the people who are breaking the rules.
Crazy sounding isn’t it?  We can fight technology and change, but in the end it will pass us and we will become archaic and irrelevant.  Not our Message, but the manner in which we present it.  Who would have ever thought texting would be as big as it is?  How about multi-site church?  Video church?  These are all things that have changed how we worship.
  1. 4.If we got kicked out & the board brought in a new CEO what would they do?  Why shouldn’t we walk out the door & then come back in & do it ourselves?
Takeaway - Acknowledge what is NOT working & own up to why you are unwilling to change it.
Some thoughts on this - rarely does the church (in general) get concerned about change until they run out of money.  What if we asked some questions before it was too late?
  1. a.What’s in decline?
  2. b.Where are we manufacturing energy? In other words pretending something is important.  An example would be if I continued to say that Bible Study was important, but never attended.  I’m blowing hot air, “manufacturing energy.”  I don’t believe that anyone wants to stand behind that or get involved in something like that.
  3. c.Finally, when are we going to unearth all underlying assumptions?  Sometimes, what we assume, is not the reality.  Are we willing to dig to find out the truth or are we happy with assuming? 
  4. 5.When your memories exceed your dreams the end is near.
Takeaway - Don’t let success or momentum overshadow your vision.  Keep the out front.
How quickly can we be satisfied?  How often do we look at things and say, “Well, it’s not great but it is better than such and such church.” Scary, but we sometimes fool ourselves into thinking like this.  Some questions to ponder:
  1. a.What the burden on your heart? (sic, yo)
  2. b.What breaks your heart?
That was it.  After that Andy just ended and prayed for all the people there & for there ministries.  As you can see from the pictures above, Buske & I got to get a picture with Andy, pretty cool.  He is way down to earth.  His wife Sandra was there also and she is just great.  We actually got to talk to her a little more than Andy.  You also notice John with the North Point member who played Bender in one of their sermon series called “Twisted”.  The series was all about how Satan twists God’s Word.  Finally, there is a photo of Buske & Todd Fields.  I’m a little bitter about that one, but you’ll need to ask me why.

Thanks to everyone who read this while I was gone.  Be looking for some cool stuff that we will be implementing at St. Marcus, especially in Sunday Night.  Thanks also for all the patience.  Writing this thing mostly between 1 AM & 2 AM means that there are probably a ton spelling and grammar mistakes.  I can’t wait to see you guys on Sunday.  Check out the Picture Page for some added photos from Drive ’08.
I’m out!

The CORE, which is only an evening service,
has not grown at all in three years or more.
---

Jeske connects all the dots.
He is all about Change
and all about Jeske.

WELS, Missouri, and the ELS Partner with ELCA, So Read about ELCA Here

$
0
0
Richard Jungkuntz took his UOJ insights from WELS
into Missouri and Seminex,
chairing the first gay Lutheran seminary.
He ended up ALC and called himself "old school."

The minutes of the ELCA - Southeastern Synod Council had this comment from Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson:

We must start talking to our ecumenical partners about shared oversight. For example, we might have more bishops but fewer synods. A specific example might be to have three bishops in the same synod.” (read here on page 18)

---

Bishop Jessica Crist, current head of the ELCA Conference of Bishops is quoted in the Aug. 2013 The Lutheran commenting on the aftermath of the 2009 homosexuality votes: "Some congregations had been angry for years; and some were still angry about mergers prior to 1988...We are healthier and happy now." 

“In some ways, Crist said, the losses were 'analogous to cleaning the rolls' of a congregation. 'We do not have the anger and hostility at synod assemblies that we had before...'”

The Lutheran writes that former Presiding Bishop Chilstrom claimed that bishops are telling him that “'it's a new day, with a more positive, upbeat spirit' as the dissent over the 2009 decision waned with the departure of the congregations opposing the decision.” (see here)

---

The loudest mouthpiece of the ELCA, The Lutheran magazine, had 5 pieces (articles or news stories) in which homosexuality was a prominent feature. The cover story, which contained the quotes above was one and another was the “My View” article. That was written by Amalia Vagts, executive director of Extraordinary Lutheran Ministries (ELM). ELM describes its mission saying it “expands ministry opportunities for publicly-identified lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people called to leadership in the Lutheran church as ordained pastors and rostered lay leaders.” (quote from here)

You can read her article here

As evidenced in this last piece, the indoctrination of laypeople continues. For all congregations and people still in the ELCA, is it wise to continue in a denomination which seeks to lead you to affirm what God has called sin? Look at how many members have already succumbed to the ELCA's talking heads and the brainwashing put forth in all their entities. 

---
http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=11557

The author is a frequent apologist for ELCA on the ALPB Online Forum.


Looking back, leaning forward

The 'new' ELCA celebrates 25 years

Happy hearts were pounding among the more than 2,000 worshipers. The soaring strain of hymns of praise filled the Columbus, Ohio, convention hall as — 25 years ago — bishops of three Lutheran church bodies poured water from three bowls into a baptismal font and theEvangelical Lutheran Church in America was born.

Years before that worship service there had been prayers, standing ovations, tears of joy and shouts of "Hallelujah!" as delegates to conventions of the American Lutheran Church, the Lutheran Church in America, and the Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches heard the results of votes approving the plan to end separate lives and merge into a new Lutheran church.

Some of us had been through previous mergers. Unions over many decades had brought together Lutherans of German, Swedish, Danish, Finnish and Norwegian heritage into congregations, synods, districts and national affiliations which — while honoring the heritage of our homelands — reflected more precisely the life and witness of Lutheranism on the North American continent.
Bishops pour water
Bishops of three Lutheran church bodies - James Crumley, Will Herzfeld and David Preus - pour water into the baptismal font in the convention hall in Columbus, Ohio, as worshipers celebrate the creation of the ELCA at the 1987 constituting convention. The ELCA was officially born Jan. 1, 1988.
The most recent of those mergers, in 1960 and 1963, created the ALC and the LCA. The AELC didn't come from a merger, but from a schism. It was composed of pastors and congregations that broke from the Lutheran Church­–Missouri Synod in the 1970s after a long, bitter dispute over theology and interpretation of the Bible.

Now, following years of discussion and negotiation, there was to be a new Lutheran church giving us a stronger, more unified witness to the gospel of Jesus Christ, guided by the teachings of Martin Luther, taking a firm hold on the 20th century and carrying that witness into the 21st century, just 12 years away.

"It was a time of youthful idealism, even playful idealism," said Ann Hafften, Weatherford, Texas, an ALC staff member at the time. "We were looking toward a oneness that was very holy and believed that was the direction we should be headed. We were looking at the world differently and at a world that was going to be different."

The world of our new ELCA would be different, but in some unsuspected and surprising ways.

Leaders emerge
The constituting convention elected Herbert Chilstrom, head of the LCA Minnesota Synod, as bishop of the new church. (The term "presiding bishop" wasn't chosen to describe the office until several years later.) On the fifth ballot, Chilstrom received 626 votes, with David Preus, then head of the ALC, receiving 411.

"The ELCA was born in turbulent times," Chilstrom wrote in his memoir, A Journey of Grace (see "Leaders 'back then' left their marks"). Massive changes in society during the 1960s and 1970s were having an impact on all churches and the attitude of Americans toward religious institutions.

The new bishop remembers being thrilled with the ELCA staff that gathered in Chicago, the site chosen for the church's national offices. "We had some very top-notch people taking positions with the ELCA," he said in an interview with The Lutheran. "When you're faced with a job you felt you could not do on your own, you wanted good people around you."

But there were disappointments and worries in the first year. Income didn't meet expectations. A budget of $112 million was found to be too optimistic. So Chilstrom encouraged units of the new church to intentionally underspend. They did so by $7 million, but there was still a shortfall.

Financial woes would continue to plague the ELCA. In 1990 the budget was cut to about $90 million. And in subsequent years there were further cuts in staff and budget.

The 2013 budget is about $62 million for ELCA operations, about $47 million of that is designated for mission support, plus about $18.5 million for ELCA World Hunger.

As we began life together in the ELCA, some chose not to join us. In the first year more than 50 congregations left to become independent or part of The Association of American Lutheran Churches, formed by ALC congregations that didn't approve of the merger.

Our new church had been launched, continuing the paths set by the previous church bodies, and shaping its own mission.

The first 100 days
Chilstrom spoke glowingly about the first 100 days of the new church.

"I'm beginning to see some changes happening in this church that in the long run are going to have profound significance for us," he said. The bishop was referring to "intentionally becoming an inclusive church," breaking out of the stereotype of Lutherans as white, northern Europeans.

"Out of this comes the question of how much variety can this church tolerate," he added.
Gunnel Sterner
This photo of Gunnel Sterner, a voting member from Bethlehem, Pa., to the 1997 Churchwide Assembly, was on the cover ofThe Lutheran. It became synonymous with the strong emotions surrounding the full communion agreement between the ELCA and the Episcopal Church. The agreement failed in 1997 but passed two years later.
"It surprised me how much I would be involved in ecumenical affairs. That came very fast. Suddenly I'm walking into a world where, if I thought the ELCA was large, the Anglican and Roman Catholic and Orthodox worlds were larger.

"It was a pleasant surprise to discover that I had so much in common with people in those other churches. I coveted those relationships in the gospel."

Ecumenism would be a key concern for theELCA, in actions that both stirred some of us and troubled others.

In 1997 we approved full altar and pulpit fellowship with three Reformed Churches: the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), the Reformed Church in America, and the United Church of Christ.

While admitting some differences in the approach to the sacrament of communion, the agreement said that shouldn't keep the church bodies from sharing the sacrament together, exchanging pastors and forming cooperative congregations. Though controversial in some circles, the "Formula of Agreement" passed by a vote of 839-193.

However, that same year we failed — by a narrow margin — to approve a similar agreement establishing fellowship with the U.S. Episcopal Church. After some renegotiation, it won approval two years later, but opposition to the requirement that pastors be ordained by bishops remained strong and even caused some congregations to begin to withdraw from the ELCA.

Those ecumenical agreements capped years of dialogue begun long before the ELCA merger was approved, bringing to fruition work started by the ALC, LCA and AELC. But some other aspects of what had been life in our previous church bodies would prove difficult for the ELCA.

Culture shifts
"I was surprised in those first years how long it was taking to grow out of the mentality of our predecessor church bodies," said Bishop E. Roy Riley of the New Jersey Synod, one of the first bishops elected after theELCA merger. "There was excitement about the new church, but the 'new' didn't really take root quickly."

Hafften, who worked outside the ELCA before joining the churchwide staff a few years after the merger, said, "Some of the barriers that I thought would break down, didn't break down. But I thought that it would be easier for people to set aside who we had been in favor of the new church.

"The congregations I moved in and out of those years weren't as excited about it as I was."

Although Riley said he "began to appreciate the cultures of those previous church bodies," at the same time he "saw why it was difficult to let go of some of that history and perspective."

For Bob Elliott, a former ELCA staff member who lives in Chicago, "those of us who were urban underestimated how conservative the rest of the country was." He said the ELCA was perceived as being "too progressive in many ways" by those in rural and semi-rural areas around the country.
Jane Ralph
Sexuality dominated the debate at virtually every Churchwide Assembly leading up to the historic 2009 decision. Jane Ralph was one of about 100 in 2005 protesting the assembly's rejection of a proposal that would have made room for partnered gay and lesbian leaders on the roster.
The ELCA also was buffeted by the difficulties facing churches and American society in the 1990s and beyond.

All of the predecessor church bodies had enthusiastically engaged such social issues as racism, sexism, economic injustice, and war and peace. The ELCAcontinued this engagement by adopting "social statements" intended to be "teaching documents" to help pastors and laypeople consider a Christian response to social problems and to guide ELCA officials in addressing public issues.

Some were controversial. A 1991 statement on abortion attempted to chart a path between the staunchly "pro-life" position that would ban almost all abortions, and what was seen as a too casual an approach to abortion. But many of those on the "pro-life" side of the issue disagreed with the statement's implications.

Other social statements addressed the role of the church in society and the death penalty (1991); care for the environment (1993); racism, ethnicity and culture (1993); peace (1995); economic life (1999); health care (2003); education (2007); sexuality (2009); and genetics (2011).

A proposed statement called "The Church and Criminal Justice: Hearing the Cries" is to be discussed at the Churchwide Assembly this year.

Sexuality proves divisive
Though the topics were wide-ranging, it was the issue of sexuality that would have seismic effects on the ELCA.

Discussions about sexuality were raging throughout society and we had addressed the issue long before the ELCA merger. An editorial in The Lutheran reviewed the positions taken by the previous church bodies (March 1987). Later that year two seminary professors would write articles about the Bible and homosexuality, and some openly gay seminarians in California sought ordination and were refused.

In a meeting early in 1988, the Conference of Bishops said gay and lesbian pastors could be ordained but would be expected to be celibate.
Jane Margaret Bengston
Jane Margaret Bengston, a fourth-generation pastor, was among the early crop of 1988 ordinations. Her father Luther Bengston (left) and grandfather Carol A. Bengston participated in the ordination presided over by Reuben Swanson (right), acting bishop of the Metropolitan Chicago Synod.
The debate went on in congregations, synods and churchwide as we prepared a social statement on sexuality, which was approved at the 2009 Churchwide Assembly. The implementing of that social statement meant that gays and lesbians who were in a recognized, lifelong partnered relationships could be ordained and that ELCA pastors could officiate at same-sex union ceremonies, although they weren't required to do so.

"I knew we could not run away from that issue," Chilstrom said, "and I thought we did as good a job as we could in getting the church ready."

Although Chilstrom said he believed the 2009 decision was "the right thing to do," he knew it would be costly.

And it was. About 700 congregations left the ELCA, sometimes after bitter fights to win the two-thirds congregational vote needed to withdraw.

Bishop Jessica Crist, current head of the Conference of Bishops, lost 20 of the 145 congregations in the Montana Synod. Losses in some Midwestern synods sometimes took dozens of churches out of the ELCA. Some that didn't leave withheld mission support to the synod, directing congregational giving to other causes.

"With the crash of the economy, this was a double whammy," said Crist in an interview.

Like other bishops, Crist said the controversy took time and money. But despite the losses, the Montana bishop remains positive. "Some congregations had been angry for years; and some were still angry about mergers prior to 1988," she said. "We are healthier and happy now. We are of one mind that we will be together in the mission of the church, even if we have different opinions on some things."

In some ways, Crist said, the losses were "analogous to cleaning the rolls" of a congregation. "We do not have the anger and hostility at synod assemblies that we had before," she added.

Chilstrom said some bishops are now saying "it's a new day, with a more positive, upbeat spirit" as the dissent over the 2009 decision waned with the departure of the congregations opposing the decision.

Most of the congregations leaving the ELCA joined two church bodies — Lutheran Congregations in Mission for Christ and the North American Lutheran Church.

Continuing to plant ...
"Planting" new churches has been a theme in American Lutheranism since Henry Melchior Muhlenberg chose ecclesia plantanda, meaning the church must be planted in a new setting (the American continent) as his motto when he began establishing Lutheran churches here in 1742.

Nearly 500 congregations have been started since 1988, 45 of them in 2012 and 55 in 2011. Actually, more than 500 "mission starts" were approved, said Mary Frances, ELCA assistant director for development of new congregations, but not all succeed.

Many pastors and people in these missions, as well as established congregations, have little or no experience with or nostalgia for the previous church bodies. The ELCA has ordained about 7,500 pastors since 1988, almost half of the active pastors now on the clergy roster.

"When the ELCA was formed, I was 8 years old," said Cheryl Walenta-Gorvie, pastor of Bethany Lutheran Church in Dallas. "I'm generations removed from those who came from Europe. I just don't see those European things emphasized much anymore."

But Walenta-Gorvie feels strongly about the value of the theological heritage of Lutheranism. "Our theology is so rich, it deserves to be proclaimed," she said.

Walenta-Gorvie grew up in a "non-Lutheran" culture, surrounded by Baptists, some of whom wondered whether Lutherans were Christian. "I get excited about the ways to proclaim a distinctively Lutheran witness," she said.

Most of her life has been in the ELCA, including her college and seminary training. What we "were" in previous generations is less important than what we can be today, she said.

Pastors at the front end of their careers are accustomed to change, she said, and "know there will be more changes."

... in prepared ground
Riley of New Jersey said young people like Walenta-Gorvie and those now reaching maturity fill him with hope.
Marck Tiegel
Every three years, young people and adult leaders throughout the church are shaped by the ELCA Youth Gathering. In 1994, Marck Tiegel, then 17 and a member of Grace Lutheran Church, Palo Alto, Calif., graced the September cover of The Lutheran in its story on the Atlanta gathering attended by 35,000 youth and adults.
"The ELCA made a huge investment in youth in its early years," he said, citing the hugely popularELCA Youth Gatherings. "Clearly we are preparing the ground well. My best hope is the young leaders we are preparing for the future."

Making the hand-off to that new generation requires work, he said, adding, "We need to find ways to care for and maintain a church filled with the wisdom and commitment of long-term members at the same time that we are creating our new leaders."

Crist said, "I'm looking forward to starting more new ministries, and our full communion agreements and partnership with other denominations will help us to do that."

The Montana bishop also sees an expanding emphasis on training lay leaders and keeping alert to new needs. Citing the biblical warning about putting "new wine" into old wineskins, Crist said, "In 1988 we knew that we made new wineskins." Many congregations, operate "unconsciously" out of their old ways, she added, and "we need to focus on the new."

There are no agreed-upon "biological" standards for the growth of church bodies, so as the ELCA celebrates its 25th birthday, it's hard to say whether we are still young or have matured. Author and radio humorist Garrison Keillor, popular chronicler of the Lutherans in fictional Lake Wobegon, said the Latin motto on the town's official seal is sumus quod sumus: "We are what we are." Not a bad description of the ELCAtoday.

It's good to know who we are, but a church looking toward the future also needs to consider what it's going to be. "We are now in a very good place," said Bill Biggs of Omaha, Neb. "And we were in a very good place 25 years ago."

While he believes it will take some new things for the ELCA to grow, Biggs said "we should never give up the principles of our church."

Biggs is a lawyer who was a delegate to the LCA convention that approved the merger and served on the transition team that brought the "new" Nebraska Synod together in 1988. "Except for my marriage," he said, "I don't think I've had a more exciting experience in my life."

People, Biggs thinks, have "lost the excitement about the new thing that we were doing" in creating the ELCA.

One of the great things about the ELCA today, he said, is "the way we understand that the church is the people, and we let people make the decisions. It's the people who make the decisions [at synod and churchwide assemblies], they aren't just told how to vote."

Biggs is a member of Rejoice! Lutheran, a congregation in Omaha that grew from 25 families to more than 3,000 members, largely, he said, "by reaching out, always reaching out, especially to young people."

The congregation's strength is that "we'll take on anything," he added, citing a program for children called "Spirit Matters," which brings those with physical or developmental disabilities into congregational life on Thursday afternoons.

The brightest ELCA future lies in making changes, Biggs said, and in "partnership." After the ELCA's ecumenical agreements with Methodist and Presbyterians, Biggs helped the synod establish Methodist/Lutheran and Presbyterian/Lutheran congregations. "We come together with a common cause," he said, "and they have the same mission as we do."

Hafften said, "It hardly seems like 25 years" since the ELCA began.

The church is still "new," she added, because an institution should be "re-creating itself every day; that will keep us young. I don't want to sit around dreaming about 'glory days,' I want to be a part of what is coming next."

Biggs said we should never be just "comfortable in our pews. We should totally commit ourselves to the future and not be afraid. The future is exciting."

---
SC13-23
MINUTES of the ELCA-SOUTHEASTERN SYNOD COUNCIL
Chattanooga Marriott Hotel, Chattanooga, TN
May 30, 2013
I. CALL TO ORDER – Vice President Doris Underwood, chair of the meeting, called to order the
May 30, 2013 meeting of the Southeastern Synod Council at the Chattanooga Marriott Hotel,
Chattanooga, Tennessee, at 10:00 a.m. Bishop Julian Gordy led the opening devotion.
A. Attendance. The following persons were marked in attendance for the meeting:
OFFICERS PRESENT:
Bishop Julian Gordy President
Ms. Doris Underwood Vice President and Chair of the meeting
Rev. Terri Stagner-Collier Secretary
Mr. Lee Smith Treasurer
CONFERENCE REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT:
Rev. Gary Soop Conference 1
Rev. Mary Peters Conference 3
Mr. Hilton Austin Conference 4
Ms. Sharon Bost Conference 5
Rev. Ed Wolff Conference 6
Rev. Randy Jones Conference 7
Mr. Kurt Stavely Conference 8
Rev. Dr. Michael Huntley Conference 9
MEMBERS AT-LARGE PRESENT:
Mr. Gary Pederson Member At-Large
Ms. Mercedes Jackson Member At-Large
Dr. Andrea Green Member At-Large
Ms. Stephanie Gaines Youth Member At-Large
COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT:
Mr. Stan Semmler Conference 2
COUNCIL POSITIONS VACANT:
Clergy At-Large
Young Adult Member At-Large
STAFF PRESENT:
Ms. Rachel Alley Assistant to the Bishop for Young Adult & Youth Ministries
Rev. Paul Summer Assistant to the Bishop
Rev. Darrel Peterson Assistant to the Bishop
AIM Michelle Angalet Executive Assistant to the Bishop
Dr. Everett Flanigan Director for Evangelical Mission
DM Rebecca Kolowé Director for Evangelical Mission
Dr. Sandra Gustavson Fiscal Advisor
OTHERS PRESENT (for some of the meeting):
Bishop Mark Hanson Presiding Bishop, ELCA
Ms. Ione Hanson Guest
Rev. Phil Harkey University of Georgia Lutheran Campus Ministry
SC13-24
B. Adoption of Agenda. Without dissent, the Council began work from the printed agenda, with
additions and corrections provided and incorporated within these minutes.
C. Removal of Proposals from En Bloc Consideration. Council members considered the list of
proposed actions contained in EXHIBIT 33. Requests were made to consider the following
proposals separately:
Audit Report (EXHIBITS 26, 27, and Synod Assembly EXHIBIT 7)
Exhibit 17 (Nomination of At-Large Members of Synod Council)
Exhibit 18 (Linn Fund Loan for Community of Grace, Grayson, GA)
Exhibit 19 (Dong Hang Mission, Duluth, GA)
Proposals listed in EXHIBIT 33 that were not removed from en bloc consideration were
approved via one en bloc motion. To provide clarity within these minutes, all proposals and their
associated actions are reported separately; those that were approved en bloc are so noted.
D. Minutes of the January 2013 Meeting. As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.01SC To approve the minutes of the January 18-19, 2013
Synod Council meeting.
II. OFFICERS
A. President - Bishop H. Julian Gordy
1. Report of the Bishop (SA, page B-1). Bishop Julian Gordy referred Council members
to the written report he prepared for the Synod Assembly. He highlighted the following
matters addressed in that report:
• Recently there has been more turnover than usual among the deans and synod
staff.
• We have organized three new congregations within the past two years.
• It has been helpful to have funds available to provide sabbatical and wellness
grants. Similar funding will be available again this year, since the Southeastern
Synod achieved the necessary percentage of members completing the health
assessment for Portico.
• The new Stewardship Table must address financial accountability issues. Last
year 26 congregations contributed nothing for mission support. The 10
congregations that gave the most mission support provided almost one-third of
the total received for this purpose.
2. Roster Status Changes (EXHIBIT 28.01)
a. Clergy On Leave from Call: As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED
and
AGREED SC13.05.02AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod ordained
ministers listed be granted On Leave from Call
status in accordance with the terms stated:
SC13-25
The Rev. Donald E. Vollenweider – 1st year, beginning 5/1/13
The Rev. Jack A. Wilder – 1st year, beginning 1/1/13
The Rev. Scott J. Seeke – 1st year, beginning 6/1/13
The Rev. Wayne S. Cobb – 2nd year beginning 8/1/13
The Rev. Julie A. Ehlers-King – 2nd year beginning 6/1/13
The Rev. M. Terrell Fugate – 3rd year beginning 9/5/13
b. Associates in Ministry / Diaconal Ministers / Deaconesses On Leave from Call:
As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.03AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod rostered lay
persons listed be granted On Leave from Call
status in accordance with the terms stated:
Ms. Sandra L. Braasch – 1st year, beginning June 1, 2013
Ms. Melody Simpkins – on leave from call-graduate study – 4th
year, beginning 7/19/13
c. Letters of Call (Clergy): As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.04AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod ordained
ministers listed be granted term calls for the
terms stated:
The Rev. Gilbert J. Roth - Executive Director, Roth Center,
One-year Extension of Term Call: Start - 5/31/13
The Rev. Sung Bae Han – Pastor Developer, Dong Hang
Mission, Duluth, GA, Start: Date of reception into the ELCA
d. Letters of Call – Term Calls: As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED
and
AGREED SC13.05.05AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod ordained
ministers listed be granted calls to serve as
Synod interim ordained ministers in accordance
with the terms stated and with all income and
benefits to be paid by the congregations
served:
The Rev. Sandra S. Niiler - Extension of One-Year Term Call:
Start - 7/13/13
The Rev. Craig N. Storlie - Extension of One-Year Term Call:
Start - 3/1/13
e. Rescinding of Term Calls: As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED
and
SC13-26
AGREED SC13.05.06AR That the call issued to the ELCA-Southeastern
Synod pastor be rescinded due to being issued
in error:
The Rev. Duane O. Salness – call issued at January 2013
Synod Council Meeting
f. Clergy Retirement: As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.07AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod Ordained
Minister listed be granted retirement status as
of the date stated:
The Rev. Kerry P. Maurer – effective July 1, 2013
g. Disability Status: As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.08AR That the ELCA-Southeastern Synod Ordained
Minister listed be granted disability status as of
the date stated:
The Rev. Gary M. Schimmer – effective March 8, 2013
h. Synodically Authorized Minister: As part of the en bloc motion, it was
PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.09AR That the following Synodically Authorized
Minister appointment by the Bishop of the
Southeastern Synod be affirmed:
The Rev. David O. Trott, Sr. - St. Stephen Lutheran Church,
Decatur, GA (with parallel Caribbean worshiping community)
- beginning January 15, 2013
i. Deaths:
The Rev. Edward A. Livingston, Loudon, TN – March 15, 2013
The Rev. Dr. Donald S. Armentrout, Sewanee, TN – March 30, 2013
The Rev. William F. Diamond, Valdosta, GA – May 4, 2013
3. Use of 2012-13 Emergency Funds (EXHIBIT 5). Bishop Gordy called the Synod
Council’s attention to EXHIBIT 5, which summarized the $2,339 in contributions and
$2,581 in expenditures from the synod’s Emergency Assistance Fund during the 2012-
13 fiscal year. The beginning balance in this fund for the current fiscal year is $5,051.55.
4. Background Checks for Secretary Nominees. Bishop Gordy reported that background
checks had been completed for the three persons nominated by the Synod Council for
the office of Synod Secretary. These persons are the Rev. Ruth Hamilton, the Rev.
Randy Jones, and Mr. Wayne Fell. No issues of concern were noted.
SC13-27
5. Global Mission Breakfast. Bishop Gordy reminded Council members that there will be
a Global Mission breakfast at 7 a.m. on Saturday, June 1, as part of the 2013 Synod
Assembly. Developments concerning two of our companion synods (Ethiopian Mekane
Yesus and Iglesia Luterana Agustina de Guatemala) will be discussed at the breakfast.
6. Apostles, Atlanta, GA Bishop Gordy provided an update about the current situation at
Apostles Lutheran Church, Atlanta. Following the 2013 Synod Assembly, he intends to
write to the congregation to inform them that they (a) cannot have a pastor who is not on
the roster of the ELCA and (b) cannot leave the ELCA without following the constitutional
process.
B. Vice President – Ms. Doris Underwood (SA, page B-2). The Council reviewed the Vice
President’s listing of recent activities, as provided in the Synod Assembly materials.
C. Secretary – Rev. Terri Stagner-Collier (SA, page B-3 and Tab F). The Council reviewed the
Secretary’s report, as provided in the Synod Assembly materials.
D. Treasurer – Mr. Lee Smith. The Council reviewed the financial reports through April 2013, as
provided in EXHIBIT 24.
1. 2012-13 Actual versus Original Spending Plan (EXHIBITS 6 and 7). The Council
reviewed the actual funding sources and expenditures in the Unrestricted Fund during
the 2012-13 fiscal year and compared them to the approved Level 1 Funding Plan. In all
but one instance, spending adhered to Synod Council guidelines for implementing
approved funding plans. The one exception involved a small overage in the “Salaries
and Housing” category; this overage resulted from the need to pay a departing staff
member for 1.33 unused vacation days. With respect to this exception, as part of the en
bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.10TR To retroactively approve the $207.93 expended
in fiscal year 2012-13 in excess of the budgeted
$391,350 for the category “Salaries and
Housing.”
2. Endowment Fund Spending Limits, 2013-14 (EXHIBIT 8). The Council reviewed the
current year spending authorizations for the synod’s endowment funds. Synod policy
limits annual spending from endowment funds to no more than 6 percent of the prior 4-
year average of investable assets for each fund.
III. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.
A. Notification of Executive Committee Actions. The Council reviewed the minutes of the
January 18, 2013 and April 10, 2013 meetings of the Executive Committee (EXHIBITS 9 and
10) and noted that the Executive Committee also met on May 29, 2013. Executive Committee
actions since January 18, 2013 that will not be otherwise addressed during the current Synod
Council meeting were the following:
• Authorization for renewal of the synod office lease for a period of 5 years, effective May
1, 2013, at a base rental rate of $14.75 per square foot.
• Appointment of Ms. Beth Hargrave (Cross of Life, Roswell, GA) and Ms. Connie
Monson (St. John’s, Atlanta, GA) to the Mutual Ministry Committee, each for two-year
SC13-28
terms ending in June 2015. Neither individual has previously served on the synod’s
Mutual Ministy Committee.
B. Representation on Committees, Task Forces, and Boards (EXHIBIT 32). As part of the en
bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.11EC To elect the following persons as specified:
Budget & Finance Committee
Rev. David Smedley, Hope, Ellijay, GA, unexpired term to June 2014 (first term)
Nominating Committee
Rev. William Flippin, Emmanuel, Atlanta, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Rev. Harry Tedrow, Mt. Zion-St. Luke, Oglethorpe, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (second
term)
Candidacy Committee
Mr. Gary Klukken, Peace, Knoxville, TN, unexpired term to June 2016 (first term)
Mr. Bill Grabill, Christ Our Shepherd, Peachtree City, GA, 6-yr term to June 2019 (first full
term)
DM Allison Ward, Redeemer, Savannah, GA, 6-yr term to June 2019 (first full term)
Kessler Scholarship Committee
Dr. Winton King, St. Paul’s, Decatur, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (second term)
Rev. Laura Bostrom, Faith, Knoxville, TN, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Board of Directors, Southeastern Lutheran Holding Corporation
Ms. Sharon Bost, Good Shepherd, Woodstock, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first full term)
Ms. Doris Underwood, Messiah, Montgomery, AL, 1-yr term to June 2014 (fourth term)
Mr. Hilton Austin, All Saints, Lilburn, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (second term)
Rev. Randy Jones, Messiah, Montgomery, AL, 1-yr term to June 2014 (second term)
Mission Outreach and Renewal Committee
Rev. Laura Shally, Shepherd of the Lake, Loudon, TN, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Audit Committee
Rev. John Rossing, Christ the King, Dalton, GA, 3-yr term to June 2016 (second term)
Ms. Julieta Cook, Prince of Peace, Alpharetta, GA, 3-yr term to June 2016 (first term)
Board of Trustees, NovusWay Ministries
Rev. Dale Sillik, Trinity, Lilburn, GA, 3-yr term (August 2, 2013 – June 30, 2016)
Youth Ministries Team
DM Mary Houck, Cross of Life, Roswell, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Mr. Thomas Jannett, Trinity, Lilburn, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Ms. Mackenzie Heck, Epiphany, Suwanee, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Mr. Jonathan Awtrey, Incarnation, Marietta, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Mr. Michael Glor, St. Timothy, Hendersonville, TN, 1-yr term to June 2014 (third term)
AIM Jo Hood, St. Andrew, Franklin, TN, 1-yr term to June 2014 (third term)
Ms. Suzanne Wilhoit, Salem, Parrottsville, TN, 1-yr term to June 2014 (third term)
Rev. Matt Steinhauer, Faith, Lebanon, TN, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Ms. Lauren Gray, Messiah, Madison, AL, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
SC13-29
Ms. Mica Koli, St. Stephen, Decatur, GA, 1-yr term to June 2014 (first term)
Campus Ministry Team
Mr. Justin Marx, Cross of Life, Roswell, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Mr. Bill Porter, Redeemer, Atlanta, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Rev. Tony Prinsen, First United, Kennesaw, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Rev. Amy Figg, St. John’s, Knoxville, TN, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Rev. Rick Ohsiek, St. Paul’s, Maryville, TN, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Mr. Noah Eggleston, Christ the Lord, Lawrenceville, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
Personnel Committee
Mr. Mike Franklin, Holy Trinity, Nashville, TN, 2-yr term to June 2015 (third term)
Mr. Bill Alderfer, Good Shepherd, Woodstock, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (third term)
Rev. Barbara Hunter, retired, MS, 2-yr term to June 2015 (second term)
Ms. Annette Harris, Christus Victor, Ocean Springs, MS, 2-yr term to June 2015 (third term)
Rev. Patricia Axel, Nativity, Bethlehem, GA, 2-yr term to June 2015 (third term)
SMO Allocations Committee
Rev. Larry Richardson, Faith, Clay, AL, 2-yr term to June 2015 (first term)
C. Congregational Constitutions. Upon the recommendation of the Rev. Randy Jones, reviewer
of congregational constitutions and as part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.12CS To approve the constitutional / bylaw amendments of
the following congregations:
Reformation, Greeneville, TN
Messiah, Decatur, GA
Christus Victor, Ocean Springs, MS
Advent, Augusta, GA
D. TEEM Program Memorandum of Understanding (EXHIBIT 11). As part of the en bloc motion,
it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.13CA To authorize Bishop Gordy to sign the memo of
understanding contained in Exhibit 11, which outlines
future collaboration between the Lutheran Theological
Center in Atlanta and the Pacific Lutheran Theological
Seminary in offering the Theological Education for
Emerging Ministries (TEEM) program.
E. Nominations for At-Large Members of Synod Council (EXHIBIT 17). Vice President
Underwood explained that there are two at-large positions to be elected during the 2013 Synod
Assembly. Given the demographic characteristics of current Synod Council members whose
terms extend beyond the 2013 Assembly, five options are detailed in EXHIBIT 17 to address
each possible scenario that could result when the conference representative, synod secretary,
youth, and young adult Synod Council elections have been completed. The Executive
Committee PROPOSED and the Synod Council
AGREED SC13.05.14SC To:
SC13-30
1. Nominate the following for two at-large positions on the Synod Council, with a
term from 2013 to 2015, contingent on the results of the Synod Council elections
for conference representatives, synod secretary, youth, and young adult member
indicating that one at-large position should be a lay male and the other position
should be a pastor (gender unspecified):
Lay Male Position: Mr. Tony Endozo, Good Shepherd, Woodstock, GA
Mr. Henry Harris, Christus Victor, Ocean Springs, MS
Clergy Position: Rev. Susan Springer, St. Andrew, Franklin, TN
Rev. Dan Pharr, Christ, Prattville, AL
2. Nominate the following for two at-large positions on the Synod Council, with a
term from 2013 to 2015, contingent on the results of the Synod Council elections
for conference representatives, synod secretary, youth, and young adult member
indicating that one at-large position should be a lay female and the other position
should be a pastor (gender unspecified):
Lay Female Position: Ms. Karen Boda, Resurrection, Marietta, GA
AIM Linda Larson, St. Paul’s, Savannah, GA
Clergy Position: Rev. Susan Springer, St. Andrew, Franklin, TN
Rev. Dan Pharr, Christ, Prattville, AL
3. Nominate the following for two at-large positions on the Synod Council, with a
term from 2013 to 2015, contingent on the results of the Synod Council elections
for conference representatives, synod secretary, youth, and young adult member
indicating that one at-large position should be a lay female and the other position
should be a lay male:
Lay Female Position: Ms. Karen Boda, Resurrection, Marietta, GA
AIM Linda Larson, St. Paul’s, Savannah, GA
Lay Male Position: Mr. Tony Endozo, Good Shepherd, Woodstock, GA
Mr. Henry Harris, Christus Victor, Ocean Springs, MS
4. Nominate the following for two at-large positions on the Synod Council, with a
term from 2013 to 2015, contingent on the results of the Synod Council elections
for conference representatives, synod secretary, youth, and young adult member
indicating that both at-large positions should be for lay females:
Position 1: AIM Linda Larson, St. Paul’s, Savannah, GA
Ms. Alice Schunemann, Ascension, Savannah, GA
Position 2: Ms. Karen Boda, Resurrection, Marietta, GA
5. Nominate the following for two at-large positions on the Synod Council, with a
term from 2013 to 2015, contingent on the results of the Synod Council elections
for conference representatives, synod secretary, youth, and young adult member
indicating that both at-large positions should be for lay males:
Position 1: Mr. Tony Endozo, Good Shepherd, Woodstock, GA
Mr. Keith James, Christ the Lord, Lawrenceville, GA
SC13-31
Position 2: Mr. Henry Harris, Christus Victor, Ocean Springs, MS
6. Authorize Vice President Doris Underwood to act on behalf of the Synod
Council at the appropriate time during the 2013 Synod Assembly to
administratively determine the Council’s at-large nominees, based on the results
of the Synod Council elections for conference representatives, synod secretary,
youth, and young adult member.
F. Organization of Nativity, Bethlehem, GA ( EXHIBIT 15). As part of the en bloc motion, it was
PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.15AR To approve the organization of Nativity Lutheran
Church, Bethlehem, Georgia, as an official
congregation of the ELCA.
G. Closure of The River (EXHIBIT 16) As part of the en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.16AR To approve the closure of The River Church, a
Southeastern Synod new start in Alpharetta, GA, and
accept the resignation of Pastor Scott Seeke from his
Synod Council call as mission developer.
H. Dong Hang Mission (EXHIBIT 19). Bishop Gordy provided background information about
recent conflicts within the Korean Lutheran community in the Atlanta area and noted that Synod
Council member Hilton Austin has been significantly involved with efforts to help mediate these
conflicts. At the recommendation of Bishop Gordy, it was PROPOSED and the Synod Council
AGREED SC13.05.17AR To designate the Dong Hang Worshiping Community
in Duluth, Georgia as a Synodically Authorized
Worshiping Community (SAWC).
I. St. Stephen’s Caribbean Mission (EXHIBIT 20) As part of the en bloc motion, it was
PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.18AR To designate St. Stephen’s Caribbean Mission in
Decatur, Georgia as a Synodically Authorized
Worshiping Community (SAWC).
J. Proposed Bylaw Regarding Synod Assembly Notice (EXHIBIT 14). As part of the en bloc
motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.19CT To recommend that the 2013 Synod Assembly amend
existing bylaw S7.13.01 as noted below, where new
wording is denoted by underlining and deletions are
denoted by the strike-through font:
S7.13.01. Notice of the time and place of all meetings of the Synod
Assembly shall be published in a synodical publication and
also sent electronically not less than 30 days prior to the
meeting by United States mail to each congregation of this
synod, and each ordained minister, active associate in
SC13-32
ministry, consecrated deacon or deaconess, commissioned
teacher, and certified or commissioned lay professional and
to each person on the roster of this synod as the roster exists
45 days prior to the meeting.
IV. COMMITTEES AND OTHER ONGOING GROUPS
The Synod Council reviewed the written reports submitted by synod committees, as noted
below.
A. Audit Committee - Mr. Dennis Wieckert, Chair (EXHIBITS 26 and 27; SA EXHIBIT 7). Synod
Treasurer Lee Smith summarized the findings of the audit report contained in EXHIBIT 7 of the
Synod Assembly materials, emphasizing that it was a clean report. The management letter
contained in EXHIBIT 27 noted that the small size of the synod staff necessitates a less than
ideal segregation of financial duties among staff. Dr. Sandra Gustavson explained that the
auditing profession is required to note when there are too few staff to allow financial tasks to be
adequately spread among different people. This problem has existed within the synod office for
many years and has been regularly noted by our auditors. Dr. Gustavson reported that the Audit
Committee has discussed the issue and that discussions will continue during Summer 2013. No
ideal solution exists, though some steps may be possible to mitigate the issue somewhat. It was
then PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.20SC To accept the 2012-13 audit report.
B. Budget and Finance Committee – Rev. John Rossing, Chair (SA Tab E)
C. Campus Ministry Team – Rev. Robb Harrell, Chair (no report)
D. Candidacy Committee – Mr. Bill Grabill, Chair (SA, page C-10)
E. Compensation Guidelines Committee – Rev. Scott Seeke, Chair (SA, page C-14)
F. Consultation Committee (no report)
G. Discipline Committee (no report)
H. Global Mission Committee – Mr. Larry Schultz, Chair (no report)
I. Kessler Scholarship Committee – Rev. Laura Bostrom, Chair. As part of the en bloc motion, it
was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.21KF To approve the following Kessler Scholarship awards
for the 2013-14 academic year:
Chris Smith $3,712
Joyce Kim $3,712
J. Mission Outreach & Renewal Committee – Rev. Laurie Williams, Chair (EXHIBIT 18 and SA,
page C-16). Treasurer Lee Smith and Diaconal Minister Rebecca Kolowé reported that the
Executive Committee had discussed the proposal provided in EXHIBIT 18 regarding the
suspension of monthly loan payments by Community of Grace, Grayson, GA through at least
September 2016. The Executive Committee emphasized its expectation that the loan
SC13-33
repayments will resume after the suspension period ends. DM Kolowé explained that the
proposal is a compromise between equipping and enabling; totaling cancelling the loan would
not be helpful in encouraging accountability by the congregation. With this background, it was
PROPOSED and the Synod Council
AGREED SC13.05.22LF To:
(1) Approve suspension of monthly repayments and interest accruals on
the Linn Fund loan made to Community of Grace, Grayson, GA through
September 2016.
(2) Approve suspension of monthly payments and interest accruals on the
Linn Fund loan made to Community of Grace, Grayson, GA for as much as
two years beyond September 2016, subject to a review of the congregation
by the Outreach and Renewal Committee during Summer 2016 and a
determination by that Committee that such payments and accruals should
continue to be suspended.
(3) Acknowledge that Community of Grace, Grayson, GA has stated that it
intends to increase its mission support contributions to 5 percent of its
unrestricted offerings over the next three years and that whether or not
such an increase has in fact occurred will be a major consideration in the
Summer 2016 review to be conducted by the Outreach and Renewal
Committee.
(4) Request that the Outreach and Renewal Committee report the findings
of its Summer 2016 review for the September 2016 meeting of the Synod
Council.
K. Mutual Ministry Committee – Mr. Ed Ringer, Convener (no report)
L. Nominating Committee – Ms. Meredith Hendricks (SA Tab D)
M. Personnel Committee – Mr. Michael Franklin, Chair (no report)
N. SMO Allocations Committee – Rev. David Hardy, Chair (no report)
O. Southeastern Lutheran Holding Corporation – Ms. Doris Underwood, President (EXHIBITS
12 and 25)
P. Synod Assembly Committee – Ms. Jan Levengood, Chair
1. Appointment of Assembly Committees (EXHIBIT 29). As part of the en bloc motion, it
was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.23SA To:
(1) Elect the following persons for two-year terms (2013 & 2014) on the
Reference and Counsel Committee:
Rev. Ruth Hamilton, St. Luke, Atlanta, GA (first term)
Ms. Lorraine Whitney, St. Stephen, Decatur, GA (first term)
SC13-34
(2) Elect the following persons for one-year terms on the following synod
assembly committees as specified:
Credentials Committee
Ms. Carolyn Davis, Living Grace, Tucker, GA (second term)
Rev. Sandra Johnson, Advent, LaGrange, GA (first term)
Ms. Beth Painter, Trinity, Hixson, TN (first term)
Rev. David Smedley, Hope, Ellijay, GA (second term)
Ms. Brenda Wahlig, Christ Our Hope, Riverdale, GA (first term)
Ms. Margery Kellar, Living Grace, Tucker, GA (first term)
Elections Committee
Ms. Sarah Henning, Community of Grace, Grayson, GA (second term)
Rev. Dena Lane, Nativity, Austell, GA (first term)
Dr. Neelie Crooke, First, Nashville, TN (first term)
Ms. Hannah Mitchell, Christ the Lord, Lawrenceville, GA (first term)
Ms. Emmaly Hughes, Ascension, Chattanooga, TN (first term)
Rev. James Lingle, Good Shepherd Maritime Ministry,
Garden City, GA (second term)
Minutes Committee
Rev. Dr. Joy Blaylock, St. Paul’s, Mobile, AL (second term)
Mr. Andy Veren, St. Mark’s, Huntsville, AL (first term)
Rev. Miriam Beecher, Christ Our Shepherd, Peachtree City, GA (first term)
Ms. Mary Winfrey, Atonement, Atlanta, GA (first term)
Mr. Rocky Moore, Cross of Life, Roswell, GA (first term)
Ms. Lisa Burns, Christ the King, Norcross, GA (first term)
(3) Appoint the following persons as consultants during the 2013 Assembly
for the committee noted:
Elections Committee
Rev. J. Howard Mettee, Celebration, Mt. Juliet, TN
Ms. Stephanie Gaines, St. Andrew, Franklin, TN
2. Review of Assembly Agenda (EXHIBITS 31 and 34, SA Tab A, and SA EXHIBIT 6).
Associate in Ministry Michelle Angalet explained that the published synod assembly
agenda provides for five ballots in the election for synod bishop. If there is an election
after only one or two ballots, then the assembly agenda will change to be very similar to
that provided in EXHIBIT 31. Ms. Angalet noted that in this contingency agenda, time is
allotted on Saturday afternoon of the assembly for mission planning conversations.
Voting members will be assigned to one of four rooms for these conversations; the
discussion questions listed on the first page of EXHIBIT 34 will be considered in each of
the four rooms. The following Synod Council members will serve as recorders for the
mission planning conversations: Mr. Hilton Austin, Pastor Terri Stagner-Collier, Pastor
Randy Jones, and Pastor Michael Huntley.
3. Question & Answer Sessions (EXHIBITS 22, 23 & SA EXHIBIT 3). Dr. Sandra Gustavson
reviewed the procedures for conducting the Question and Answer sessions on Saturday
afternoon of the Synod Assembly if there is not an election for bishop after three ballots. In
SC13-35
this situation, Synod Council members will serve as moderators of the Question and
Answer sessions and will organize the questions formulated by Assembly voting members.
Details of the process are documented in EXHIBIT 23; specific Council member
assignments are set forth in EXHIBIT 22.
Q. Worship Ministries Team – Rev. Kevin Strickland, Chair (SA, page C-12)
R. Youth Ministry Team – Ms. Jo Hood, Chair (no report)
V. TASK FORCES
The Synod Council reviewed the written reports submitted by synod task forces, as noted
below.
A. African Descent Strategy Task Force – Dr. Andrea Green, Chair (EXHIBIT 35). As part of the
en bloc motion, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.24TF To extend authorization for the African Descent
Strategy Task Force through September 30, 2013.
B. Death Penalty Information Task Force – Rev. Randy Palm, Chair (no report)
C. Disaster Preparedness and Response Task Force - Rev. Dr. Morgan Gordy, Chair (no report)
D. Immigration Task Force – Rev. Kent Lewis, Chair (no report)
E. Care for the Troops Task Force – Rev. William Flippin, Chair (no report)
F. Health Ministries Task Force – Ms. Connie Pearson, Chair (SA, page C-13)
G. Poverty, Hunger & Justice Task Force – Mr. Jonathan Trapp, Chair (no report)
H. Anti-Racism Task Force – Ms. Cathy Crimi, Chair (SA, page C-11)
I. Stewardship Task Force – Rev. Susan Montgomery, Chair (SA, page C-17)
VI. CONFERENCES & CLUSTERS
A. Reports from Conferences. The Synod Council reviewed the written conference reports that
had been submitted in advance.
1. Ebenezer Conference – Rev. Chip Lingle (no report)
2. Good N.E.W.S. Conference – (no report)
3. Trinity Conference – Mr. John Thomas (no report)
4. Magi Conference – Mr. Keith James (no report)
5. Mission Conference – Rev. Tim Morgan (no report)
SC13-36
6. Life Together Conference – Mr. John Kreis (SA, page C-41)
7. Diaspora Conference – Rev. Randy Jones (no report)
8. The King Conference – Mr. Gary Wicks (no report)
9. Ruach Conference – Rev. Marcia Shumate-Schultz (no report)
B. Cluster Deans – Rev. Jill Henning, Coordinator (no report)
VII. REPORTS OF SYNOD STAFF
Council members reviewed the written staff reports that had been provided in advance.
A. Rev. Paul Summer – Assistant to the Bishop (SA, page B-8)
B. Rev. Darrel Peterson - Assistant to the Bishop (SA, page B-7)
C. Ms. Rachel Alley – Assistant to the Bishop for Young Adult and Youth Ministries (SA, page B-10)
D. Dr. Everett Flanigan – Director for Evangelical Mission (SA, page B-6)
E. DM Rebecca Kolowé – Director for Evangelical Mission (SA, page B-4)
F. AIM Michelle Angalet – Executive Assistant to the Bishop (SA, page B-13)
G. Dr. Sandra Gustavson – Fiscal Advisor (SA, page B-12)
H. Ms. Holly Liersch – Office Manager (no report)
I. Ms. Abby Koning – Lutheran Volunteer Corps Staffer (no report)
VIII. AGENCIES, INSTITUTIONS, and ORGANIZATIONS
A. Presentations to the Synod Council
1. University of Georgia Lutheran Campus Ministry (EXHIBIT 36 and SA, page C-20). As
a special order at 1 pm, the Rev. Phil Harkey explained the history of the Lutheran
Campus Ministry program on the campus of the University of Georgia (UGA), noting that
their current emphases are relationship building and leadership development. Students
are encouraged to attend Holy Cross Lutheran Church in Athens for Sunday worship.
Wednesdays are focused on food, fun, and fellowship. Pastor Harkey encouraged
Council members to send him the names of students attending UGA. Assistant to the
Bishop Rachel Aley noted that she has posted the contacts for all campus ministries on
the synod web site.
B. Written Reports. Synod Council members reviewed the written reports submitted in advance
by the agencies, institutions, and organizations, as noted below:
SC13-37
1. Day 1 (SA, page C-38)
2. ELCA Campus Ministry
a. Atlanta University Campus Ministry (SA, page C-22)
b. Georgia Tech, GA State, Agnes Scott, Emory (SA, page C-21)
c. East Tennessee State Lutheran Campus Ministry (no report)
d. Tyson House, University of Tennessee (SA, page C-18)
3. Evangelical Lutheran Coalition for Mission in Appalachia (SA, page C-39)
4. James R. Crumley, Jr. Archives (SA, page C-23)
5. Lutheran Men in Mission (no report)
6. Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary (SA, page C-31)
7. Lutheran Theological Center in Atlanta (SA, page C-8)
8. Lutheran Youth Organization (no report)
9. Newberry College (SA, page C-33)
10. NovusWay Ministries (SA, page C-27)
11. Region 9 (SA, page C-29)
12. SESYALL (no report)
13. Social Ministry Organizations:
a. Lutheran Ministries of Alabama (no report)
b. Lutheran Services of Georgia (SA, page C-25)
c. Lutheran Episcopal Services in Mississippi (EXHIBIT 13)
d. Lutheran Services in Tennessee (no report)
e. All Things New Ministry (no report)
f. ALMS (no report)
14. Southeastern Women of the ELCA (SA, page C-15)
IX. PLANNING SESSIONS
A. Roles of Staff, Council, and Assemblies (EXHIBITS 21 and 34). As a special order at
approximately 1:45 p.m., Mr. Hilton Austin led the Synod Council in a discussion focusing on the
SC13-38
roles of conferences, the synod council, assemblies, and the synod staff in building mutual
accountability. Points made during the discussion included:
• Only one or two conferences seem to be functioning well.
• Congregations in conferences that are more geographically dispersed seem to need
each other more. Where congregations are close geographically, there is competition for
members.
• The chair of Conference 6 is very enthusiastic and organized. The challenge is to get
people to come to the meetings. How much the pastors express the importance of the
conference meeting is crucial.
• The problem with conferences is not just one of geography. We must fix the problems if
conferences are going to carry out the governance function that our constitution assigns
to them.
• Conferences may be too inward thinking.
• The problem extends to the congregational level. A pastor’s job constitutionally is to
make sure that the relationship between the congregation, the synod, and the
churchwide organization is strengthened and supported.
• There are two issues. One is governance, which has to be taken seriously. The second
is accountability to one another as members of this church. What do we owe each other
as members of the body of Christ?
• The Directors for Evangelical Mission often speak to congregations about the “3 R’s” of
relevancy, response, and relationship.
• Communication is often not effective at the conference level. Communication is not
reaching lay persons.
• There is often a lack of purpose for going to conference meetings. It might be better to
spend effort focusing on joint efforts and ministry – not just getting together to plan the
next meeting. Focusing solely on conferences is not as helpful as talking about joint
ministries.
• It would be good if every congregation knew that it could count on the church beyond
itself, including not just synod representatives but also neighboring congregations.
People aren’t looking for more activities.
• We are fighting the cultures of individualism and consumerism.
• We can’t assume that everyone has the same idea of what is meant by some terms
(such as spiritual discipline and practice). Little shared cultural language still exists.
• We could invite Mark Allan Powell to an assembly to conduct a series of stewardship
sessions and we could form groups to follow up afterwards.
• The Church is, the Church does what it is, and the Church organizes what it does. But
what the Church “is” may be different now than it used to be.
SC13-39
• The Church’s role is the same that it has always been. The Church is the Body of
Christ. It invites others to be part of the community of Christ. Might the role of the synod
council be to help congregations carry out their missions better (to embody Christ)?
What have we been focusing on instead and how can we change that?
• The synod staff must be involved with candidacy, the call process, and conflict
management. Its role is to support congregations. Governance is important, but where
do staff, Council members, and assemblies have opportunities to help congregations
embody Christ where they live?
• The role of staff and the Synod Council should be to raise up new leaders.
• It might be good to focus assemblies on one thing, rather than a variety of workshop
choices.
• It is important that candidacy and mobility are handled well, to help avoid other
problems in the future.
• We struggle with congregational collaboration. Pastors should connect the dots
between worship and what is happening in the wider church.
B. The Changing Roles of Synods (EXHIBITS 30 and 37). As a special order at approximately
4:15 pm, Bishop Gordy led the Council in a discussion focusing on the roles of synods. The
bishop provided background information for the discussion by reviewing the report of the
Southeastern Synod’s ministry audit conducted by the churchwide organization in Fall 2007.
Strengths cited at that time included the fact that states in this synod were growing rapidly, there
was increasing racial and ethnic diversity, and much ministry was being done by congregations
and boards. In addition, the synod’s youth ministry programs, Lutheranch, and the Catch the
Spirit program were all cited as strengths.
The biggest challenge cited in the ministry audit was that of connecting. The report concluded
that although geography was an issue, the synod could play a role in helping congregations
connect with each other. A primary need was for the synod to address the sense of isolation
and secondly, to mend relationships.
The bishop asked Council members to reflect on what might be said if a similar ministry audit
were to be done today. Responses included the following:
• The challenges have not changed, but the financial issues are greater.
• Clusters seem to be functioning well in most places.
• It would be helpful if the bishop and assistants would make themselves available to
conferences for two-day sessions, perhaps focusing on leadership development.
• Youthful people will respond more to mission than to tradition.
• There is a continuing challenge with respect to diversity. It is also an opportunity to
reach out to different demographics.
• The Synod staff is responding to what is needed.
SC13-40
• A focus on the essentials of being the body of Christ will help build a sense of trust and
relationship. We should also highlight what we can only do together. We are making
good progress, but we have to focus and celebrate the essentials.
• There is a good spirit throughout synod, but it is not always communicated well.
In response to an invitation to share his views, Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson offered several
comments, which included the following points:
• All synods are asking the same questions of sustainability and survivability. About half
of the congregations are also doing so. The role of synods is to move the conversation
from survivability to vitality.
• We must look at Sunday worship. Lutherans should learn how to talk about Jesus and
the Holy Spirit.
• Paying for at least one Director for Evangelical Mission in each synod is perhaps the
biggest thing the churchwide organization has done in the past 25 years.
• Because we have six full communion partners, there are new resources available to us.
Sustainability of a congregation is not the end goal – the goal is to bring persons to the
Gospel. We have greater capacity working together, either as multiple congregations or
with our ecumenical partners.
• We are too activity generated, rather than outcome oriented. There has to be a greater
focus on the vitality of congregations.
• Nostalgia is the most dangerous disease within the ELCA.
• Some synods are thinking of themselves as “mission districts,” in which the primary
purpose of the synod is identifying missional leaders, preparing them for a diverse
church, and then supporting them. Synods are struggling with manageable priorities.
• We must start talking to our ecumenical partners about shared oversight. For example,
we might have more bishops but fewer synods. A specific example might be to have
three bishops in the same synod.
• Many congregations need practice in the art of hospitality.
• Within three weeks following the synod assembly, the synod bishop, staff, and perhaps
the vice president should send a letter to congregations describing their priorities for the
next six years. No more than 10 percent of their time should be spent on conflict
resolution. The letter might also state what the expectations of congregations are.
• We must find a way to identify future lay and clergy leaders when they are very young.
C. Accountable Structures. As a special order at approximately 7 pm, Diaconal Minister
Rebecca Kolowé led the Council in a discussion focusing on the development of an accountable
structure within the Southeastern Synod. She began by posing several questions, including:
• How can an accountable structure be developed?
SC13-41
• Could a covenant agreement be developed between the Synod Council and
congregational councils? Covenants provide a teaching opportunity about the Biblical
narrative.
• Can we do something that captures excitement, rather than putting an emphasis on
legalities?
• How do Synod Council members model what they want to ask of congregations?
• Is it feasible for a community of congregations and synod staff to commit to doing
mission planning as a group over the course of about a year?
During the ensuing discussion, points made included the following:
• Accountability is not law. Congregations may need to be reminded of the mutual
accountability that already exists.
• Perhaps it’s the job of the Synod Council and staff to let people know that there are
resources available to help them talk about what God’s plan for them is in their contexts.
• Can the Synod Council have a conversation with congregational councils who have
made no mission support contributions in many years?
• Deans sometimes meet with congregations that have issues.
• What do Synod Council members do at the conference level? What could they do?
• There is a large question of relevancy. What are the reasons for gathering? Maybe one
reason is to gather despite differences.
• Perhaps a job description could be developed and given to new Council members.
Structures are not in place for implementing the Council’s vision. It’s even more unclear
what at-large members of the Synod Council are supposed to do.
• During the September orientation session for the Synod Council, we could discuss
responsibilities and how that also translates into general expectations of Council
members.
• We should develop a job description for Synod Council members. This information
could be posted on the Synod web site and disseminated by the Nominating Committee
when it is seeking nominees for at-large positions.
• Showing up at congregational celebrations can be considered to be part of the role of
Synod Council members in nurturing congregations.
As the discussion concluded, it was PROPOSED and
AGREED SC13.05.25TF To:
SC13-42
(1) Appoint a work group to develop a job description for Synod Council
members, with an initial draft to be shared via Google Groups during
Summer 2013 and a final proposal to be considered at the September 2013
Synod Council meeting;
(2) Appoint Synod Council members Mr. Gary Pederson (convener), Dr.
Andrea Green, Ms. Doris Underwood, and Pastor Randy Jones as members
of the work group;
(3) Appoint Diaconal Minister Rebecca Kolowé as the staff liaison to the
work group;
(4) Request that the work group address issues of accountability in its
proposed job description, with specific attention to accountability among
Synod Council members and accountability to congregations and to the
synod staff.
X. FUTURE MEETINGS
A. Synod Master Calendar. It was noted that the synod’s master calendar is available online at
www.elca-ses.org, under the “Synod Information” tab.
B. Synod Council and Assembly Meetings. The list of approved future meeting dates and
locations is as follows:
Synod Council
June 2, 2013 Chattanooga Marriott Hotel, Chattanooga, TN
September 6-7, 2013 Holy Trinity, Marietta, GA
January 17-18, 2014 Resurrection, Marietta, GA
May 29 & June 1, 2014 Chattanooga Marriott Hotel, Chattanooga, TN
September 5-6, 2014 Location to be determined
January 16-17, 2015 Location to be determined
Synod Assembly
May 31-June 2, 2013 Chattanooga Convention Center, Chattanooga, TN
May 30-June 1, 2014 Chattanooga Convention Center, Chattanooga, TN
Churchwide Assembly
August 12-18, 2013 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
XI. QUESTION & ANSWER SESSION WITH BISHOP HANSON
Rather than waiting for questions to be addressed to him during this segment, Presiding Bishop
Mark Hanson asked the Council members to describe the Southeastern Synod six years from
now, in 2019. Responses included:
• Transparency in our partnership of sharing the gospel
• We will be able to nourish a synodical understanding of our shared ministry. When the
next big disagreement surfaces, we won’t leave but will stay together despite our
differences.
SC13-43
• The 2019 Synod Council will thank this Council for giving them a clear sense of
purpose.
Bishop Hanson then asked how many new congregations will be started in the Southeastern
Synod in the next six years, and requested a description of the leaders of those new
congregations. Council responses included:
• The priority will not be on buildings.
• There will be more missional communities defined by their faith, ecumenically linked,
and younger.
• We hope that all congregations understand what it means to be a mission outpost.
Bishop Hanson concluded by expressing his hope that the Southeastern Synod will have an
effective mission strategy, as well as a plan for developing leadership and support.
XII. ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 9:08 pm on Thursday, May 30, 2013 with
a prayer by Mr. Kurt Stavely.

Viewing all 11615 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>