Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 12047 articles
Browse latest View live

Why the Synods' Schemes of Deception Have Failed

$
0
0
What is the treasure of the Bible?
See below for the explanation.

One WELS layman had a light-bulb moment when the mission pastor, now teaching at the Asian mini-seminary, did not provide a mid-week Lenten services.

Many episodes of enlightenment have happened since that crisis of conscience. It comes down to two approaches to history. One is lots of fun, because it consists of telling tall tales, in the style of Herodotus. Many things we supposedly know about ancients times come from Herodotus, who is great fun to read. That is the style of synodical history that prevails today, legends and mythologies, some without a trace of evidence, but still entertaining - like the cartoons about Bullwinkle, Rocky the Squirrel, and Yogi Bear.

The other approach to history is analytical, which examines both sides of a dispute, looks at evidence, and lacks a political agenda. Thucydides and Gibbon wrote this way, although no one has ever equaled Thucydides, as he foresaw. "This work will last forever."

Post-Synodical Pratfalls
The so-called conservative Lutheran synods enjoy their Schadenfreude about ELCA, but they are only a few years behind the radicals. The downhill trend in ELCA (seminaries, colleges, congregations) is just as prevalent in the LCMS-WELS-ELS corner of Lutherdom.

ELCA has repudiated its past, and the Synodical Conference has built a house of cards from its lies.



Synodical Conference Lies
The LCMS-ELS-WELS confraternity anchors its teaching in Walther and similar rationalistic Pietists, not in the Scriptures and the Book of Concord.

SP Mirthless Mark Schroeder tried to sell WELS on the deception that his sect was orthodox from the beginning and remains so, fresh and pure like the morning dew. Schroeder has been a conscious participant in removing all traces of Lutheran doctrine and worship, so the synod can return to its unionistic, Pietistic roots. Yes, there are historical reasons why WELS leaders love Disciples of Christ guru Donald McGavran and the Southern Babtists.

The SynCon leaders have financed and promoted Fuller/Willow Creek Church Growth for decades while denying the truth and punishing dissenters.

The SynCons have done even worse - promoting a Universalistic dogma foreign to the Bible, the Reformation, and the Confessions, as if it were a precious treasure. John Sparky Brenner, with a PhD from a Jesuit school, wrote about the dunce JP Meyer and his teaching of "the precious doctrine of objective justification." (Jars of Clay) Brenner is a good example of someone who cannot say the words Justification by Faith and takes every opportunity to promote the dogma of Halle University - universal forgiveness.



JP Meyer is known for his commentary on II Corinthians, Ministers of Christ. Brenner wrote:
The commentary is a masterpiece offering, among other things, practical advice on Christian stewardship and insight into the precious doctrine of objective justificationJars, p. 184.


Here is the ELS, from its own websty -

This doctrine has often been called by our older theologians “Objective Justification.” It is a precious teaching of the Bible. Therefore, our synod was disturbed when our sister-synod, the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, adopted at its convention in 1950 a document called “The Common Confession” which contains the sentence:
“By His redemptive work Christ is the Propitiation for the sins of the whole world; hence the forgiveness of sin has been assured and provided for all men. (This is often spoken of as objective justification.)”
From this sentence, one may gain the impression that although Christ has redeemed all people, God has not declared all people righteous in Christ.
Our synod expressed itself as not satisfied with the definition of objective justification just quoted from “The Common Confession.”

Here is the dunce Rolf Preus making fun of Justification by Faith, from his own websty - 
The denial of objective justification forces us all into a vicious kind of fideism (faith in faith in faith in faith) which cannot get out of the circle because the final question to be answered is never "what does God tell me?" but always "how is my faith?"
 Rolf's biggest problem, besides his poor education, is his lack of comprehension about faith. Luther was a fideist, a solafideist.



Last Ash Wednesday

$
0
0
 Norma A. Boeckler


Last Ash Wednesday I was finishing The Lost Dutchman's Goldmine, about Luther's Biblical Doctrine of the Word.

This year, Luther's Sermons are being finished.


  • Volume VI is with Janie Sullivan, being prepared for Amazon and Kindle.
  • Volume VII is almost ready for Norma A. Boeckler's art.
  • Volume VIII is being read and corrected by Virginia Roberts.
  • The Gems volume is almost ready, by virtue of having each volume's gems selected as we publish.
More New Testament Greek will be taught, starting tonight.

Romans 1-5 will be taught during the Easter season.

Looking ahead, these volumes are planned:
  • Luther's Two Catechisms
  • The Gospel of John in English and Greek
  • The Ichabod Lutheran Dictionary - fun and informative.
  • Some other alarms and diversions for the apostates to suffer.
 Norma A. Boeckler

Ask Wednesday, 2018. First Greek Lesson at the End of the Service

$
0
0

Ash Wednesday, 2018, 7 PM Central

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson



The Hymn #552                Abide with Me 
            
The Order of Vespers                                                p. 41
The Psalmody               Psalm 1                        p. 123
The Lection                              Joel 2:12-19
Matthew 6:16-2


The Sermon –   Treasures in Heaven
The Prayers
The Lord’s Prayer
The Collect for Grace                                       p. 45

The Hymn # 429      Lord, Thee I Love                  


KJV Joel 2:12 Therefore also now, saith the LORD, turn ye even to me with all your heart, and with fasting, and with weeping, and with mourning: 13 And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil. 14 Who knoweth if he will return and repent, and leave a blessing behind him; even a meat offering and a drink offering unto the LORD your God? 15 Blow the trumpet in Zion, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly: 16 Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children, and those that suck the breasts: let the bridegroom go forth of his chamber, and the bride out of her closet. 17 Let the priests, the ministers of the LORD, weep between the porch and the altar, and let them say, Spare thy people, O LORD, and give not thine heritage to reproach, that the heathen should rule over them: wherefore should they say among the people, Where is their God? 18 Then will the LORD be jealous for his land, and pity his people. 19 Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil, and ye shall be satisfied therewith: and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:



KJV Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. 19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.


Treasures in Heaven

KJV Matthew 6:16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. 


Luther wrote about the fashion of his time, to go about looking sad and mournful, to make oneself look holy and earn the praises of others. In fact, I read about one pope who established himself early as very pious because of this action. He was also one of the most corrupt in a very corrupt age.

The problem with this is, that people then imagine they are paying for their sins by being mournful, instead of rejoicing in the forgiveness of sin. Human nature is such that people always get this wrong and want to pay for their sins for suffering, which means that Jesus did not do enough. They must finish the effort and earn the reward. By denying God's grace and the meaning of the Atonement, people add sins to their sin, compounding the problem. One way or another, they harden their hearts with the notion they can repeat this in the future, suffering to pay for those sins.

17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face; 18 That thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly. 

This is the source of endless commentary in all forms of literature - faking an attitude to fool others. But of course, that really does not matter because God knows our hearts. There is really quite a cutting remark in the verse above - those who gain the regard of others for their show of piety, sorrow, mournfulness - they already have their reward, from man. Various people admire him and suggest him for a higher spiritual office. This can put someone on a course of fakery until it becomes too much. If not outwardly tragic, inwardly the person hardens his heart and despises the role he thinks he must play. That is why some clergy will put on a great show and be successful in the eyes of others, then become atheists and abandon everything. 

The Word is effective in converting people to faith and in nurturing that faith. But those who treat the Word as a meal-ticket and a soft cushion begin to hate the prison they build for themselves.

19 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: 

The more we gain, the more we need to protect it. If we have a smart-phone, we need a case that helps to keep it whole. And then we may need an insurance policy for when it is lost, stolen, or broken. 

God gives us many things to enjoy and love, but not so we build an altar to them and supplant the true worship with veneration of earthly objects or institutions. One pastor's wife was asked about a church. She said, "It's beautiful, but they worship every brick in that church." The person who asked was from that church and was not pleased. Sometimes it is a church building or a house or an institution.

One of the Lutheran pioneers (Schmauk, perhaps) said he did not worry if a congregation or another church institution failed. That was not his concern because the Word of God remains forever, nothing else. On the news I look at vast buildings and priceless stained glass windows, where people gather to mock the Gospel in the name of the Gospel - not in subtle ways, but the most blatant ways possible. It is as if they have borrowed my history books of the Roman Empire (too bad, I tossed them) and studied how to be as depraved. They have taken over what grew from the Word because several generations mistook the bricks and glass for the church.

In a few decades, they will be art museums and theaters, something seen all over New England, where Calvinism once reigned.

20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: 

Treasure is a good word to remember, treasures in heaven is even better. What is this treasure that cannot be corrupted, cannot rust away, cannot be stolen? It was a favorite word of the Lutheran Reformation. Luther used it often in his Large Catechism. I am listing the occurrences at the end of this sermon.

We can see the Gospel = Treasure in their writing. And in the New Testament, the Gospel is Jesus dying for the sins of the world. Needless to say, the rationalists get this wrong. They are intoxicated by their own ideas that they forget their ideas are not in the Bible. 

The atoning death of Christ did not absolve the entire world of its sins. Most people realize this, and the covert Universalists will not listen.

The good news is that there is nothing man can do for the forgiveness of sin and salvation because Christ has already paid the price. That is why we call Jesus Savior and Redeemer. 

All of the Scriptures support this proclamation of the Gospel, and Jesus' own sermons do so as well. (The blind opponents do not see this either, but they blind themselves through the Word by constantly opposing the Word.)

What we can learn from the great teachers of the past is this - the Bible itself is a great treasure because it is a unified Truth written to create faith in the hearts of all people, to nourish that faith, to give confidence and hope and security in this Word of Truth.

Because this Gospel is God's treasure, no one can take it away. No circumstance can change it. It is eternal and everlasting.

21 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

On Valentine's Day, the heart is the symbol of romantic love. But we know the heart is the sign of many kinds of love. When people have babies, they discover an intense love they never knew before. Grandparents are even more smitten. If the Word of God is the greatest treasure to us, our heart will always concentrate on that love.

Loving the Gospel Word of Jesus does not detract from any other love. In fact, that teaches us more about genuine love, since His love comes to us undeserved and makes us beloved brothers and members of His family.

That love from the Savior constantly influences how we love our spouse, children, parents, grandparents, siblings, friends, and neighbors. Getting even has a way of multiplying and never ending. However, being considerate and forgiving has the same power and is just as contagious. 

The difference is, getting even is powered from the Old Adam. Gospel love is fueled only by the Word of Grace. If we neglect that, the Old Adam will grow dominant and forget about the great and everlasting treasure of the Gospel.


---

Greek for Tonight



εν αρχη ην ο λογος και ο λογος ην προς τον θεον και θεος ην ο λογος
ουτος ην εν αρχη προς τον θεον
παντα δι αυτου εγενετο και χωρις αυτου εγενετο ουδε εν ο γεγονεν
εν αυτω ζωη ην και η ζωη ην το φως των ανθρωπων
και το φως εν τη σκοτια φαινει και η σκοτια αυτο ου κατελαβεν



Treasure in the Large Catechism

91] For the Word of God is the sanctuary above all sanctuaries, yea, the only one which we Christians know and have. For though we had the bones of all the saints or all holy and consecrated garments upon a heap, still that would help us nothing; for all that is a dead thing which can sanctify nobody. But God's Word is the treasure which sanctifies everything, and by which even all the saints themselves were sanctified. At whatever hour, then, God's Word is taught, preached, heard, read or meditated upon, there the person, day, and work are sanctified thereby, not because of the external work, but because of the Word, which makes saints of us all. 92] Therefore I constantly say that all our life and work must be ordered according to God's Word, if it is to be God-pleasing or holy. Where this is done, this commandment is in force and being fulfilled. Third Commandment. LC.

24] Thus we have most briefly presented the meaning of this article, as much as is at first necessary for the most simple to learn, both as to what we have and receive from God, and what we owe in return, which is a most excellent knowledge, but a far greater treasure. For here we see how the Father has given Himself to us, together with all creatures, and has most richly provided for us in this life, besides that He has overwhelmed us with unspeakable, eternal treasures by His Son and the Holy Ghost, as we shall hear. Article 1, LC, Creed.

38] For neither you nor I could ever know anything of Christ, or believe on Him, and obtain Him for our Lord, unless it were offered to us and granted to our hearts by the Holy Ghost through the preaching of the Gospel. The work is done and accomplished; for Christ has acquired and gained the treasure for us by His suffering, death, resurrection, etc. But if the work remained concealed so that no one knew of it, then it would be in vain and lost. That this treasure, therefore, might not lie buried, but be appropriated and enjoyed, God has caused the Word to go forth and be proclaimed, in which He gives the Holy Ghost to bring this treasure home and appropriate it to us. 39] Therefore sanctifying is nothing else than bringing us to Christ to receive this good, to which we could not attain of ourselves. Article3 , LC, Creed.

43] For where He does not cause it to be preached and made alive in the heart, so that it is understood, it is lost, as was the case under the Papacy, where faith was entirely put under the bench, and no one recognized Christ as his Lord or the Holy Ghost as his Sanctifier, that is, no one believed that Christ is our Lord in the sense that He has acquired this treasure for us, without our works and merit, and made us acceptable to the Father. What, then, was lacking? 44] This, that the Holy Ghost was not there to reveal it and cause it to be preached; but men and evil spirits were there, who taught us to obtain grace and be saved by our works. 45] Therefore it is not a Christian Church either; for where Christ is not preached, there is no Holy Ghost who creates, calls, and gathers the Christian Church, without which no one can come to Christ the Lord. 46] Let this suffice concerning the sum of this article. But because the parts which are here enumerated are not quite clear to the simple, we shall run over them also. Article 3, LC, Creed

38] Here now the great need exists for which we ought to be most concerned, that this name have its proper honor, be esteemed holy and sublime as the greatest treasure and sanctuary that we have; and that as godly children we pray that the name of God, which is already holy in heaven, may also be and remain holy with us upon earth and in all the world. Lord’s Prayer First Petition LC

55] From this you perceive that we pray here not for a crust of bread or a temporal, perishable good, but for an eternal inestimable treasure and everything that God Himself possesses; which is far too great for any human heart to think of desiring if He had not Himself commanded us to pray for the same. 56] But because He is God, He also claims the honor of giving much more and more abundantly than any one can comprehend,-like an eternal, unfailing fountain, which, the more it pours forth and overflows, the more it continues to give,-and He desires nothing more earnestly of us than that we ask much and great things of Him, and again is angry if we do not ask and pray confidently.

57] For just as when the richest and most mighty emperor would bid a poor beggar ask whatever he might desire, and were ready to give great imperial presents, and the fool would beg only for a dish of gruel, he would be rightly considered a rogue and a scoundrel, who treated the command of his imperial majesty as a jest and sport, and was not worthy of coming into his presence: so also it is a great reproach and dishonor to God if we, to whom He offers and pledges so many unspeakable treasures, despise the same, or have not the confidence to receive them, but scarcely venture to pray for a piece of bread.

58] All this is the fault of the shameful unbelief which does not look to God for as much good as will satisfy the stomach, much less expects without doubt such eternal treasures of God. Therefore we must strengthen ourselves against it, and let this be our first prayer; then, indeed, we shall have all else in abundance, as Christ teaches [ Matt. 6:33 ]: Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you. For how could He allow us to suffer want and to be straitened in temporal things when He promises that which is eternal and imperishable? Lord’s Prayer, Second Petition, LC

15] Therefore it is pure wickedness and blasphemy of the devil that now our new spirits, to mock at Baptism, omit from it God's Word and institution, and look upon it in no other way than as water which is taken from the well, and then blather and say: How is a handful of water to help the soul? 16] Aye, my friend, who does not know that water is water if tearing things asunder is what we are after? But how dare you thus interfere with God's order, and tear away the most precious treasure with which God has connected and enclosed it, and which He will not have separated? For the kernel in the water is God's Word or command and the name of God, which is a treasure greater and nobler than heaven and earth. Holy Baptism, LC

32] In the third place, since we have learned the great benefit and power of Baptism, let us see further who is the person that receives what Baptism gives and profits. 33] This is again most beautifully and clearly expressed in the words: He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved. That is, faith alone makes the person worthy to receive profitably the saving, divine water. For, since these blessings are here presented and promised in the words in and with the water, they cannot be received in any other way than by believing them with the heart. 34] Without faith it profits nothing, notwithstanding it is in itself a divine superabundant treasure. Therefore this single word (He that believeth) effects this much that it excludes and repels all works which we can do, in the opinion that we obtain and merit salvation by them. For it is determined that whatever is not faith avails nothing nor receives anything.

35] But if they say, as they are accustomed: Still Baptism is itself a work, and you say works are of no avail for salvation; what, then, becomes of faith? Answer: Yes, our works, indeed, avail nothing for salvation; Baptism, however, is not our work, but God's (for, as was stated, you must put Christ-baptism far away from a bath-keeper's baptism). God's works, however, are saving and necessary for salvation, and do not exclude, but demand, faith; for without faith they could not be apprehended. 36] For by suffering the water to be poured upon you, you have not yet received Baptism in such a manner that it benefits you anything; but it becomes beneficial to you if you have yourself baptized with the thought that this is according to God's command and ordinance, and besides in God's name, in order that you may receive in the water the promised salvation. Now, this the fist cannot do, nor the body; but the heart must believe it.

37] Thus you see plainly that there is here no work done by us, but a treasure which He gives us, and which faith apprehends; just as the Lord Jesus Christ upon the cross is not a work, but a treasure comprehended in the Word, and offered to us and received by faith. Therefore they do us violence by exclaiming against us as though we preach against faith; while we alone insist upon it as being of such necessity that without it nothing can be received nor enjoyed.
38] Thus we have these three parts which it is necessary to know concerning this Sacrament, especially that the ordinance of God is to be held in all honor, which alone would be sufficient, though it be an entirely external thing, like the commandment, Honor thy father and thy mother, which refers to bodily flesh and blood. Therein we regard not the flesh and blood, but the commandment of God in which they are comprehended, and on account of which the flesh is called father and mother; so also, though we had no more than these words, Go ye and baptize, etc., it would be necessary for us to accept and do it as the ordinance of God. 39] Now there is here not only God's commandment and injunction, but also the promise, on account of which it is still far more glorious than whatever else God has commanded and ordained, and is, in short, so full of consolation and grace that heaven and earth cannot comprehend it. 40] But it requires skill to believe this, for the treasure is not wanting, but this is wanting that men apprehend it and hold it firmly.

41] Therefore every Christian has enough in Baptism to learn and to practise all his life; for he has always enough to do to believe firmly what it promises and brings: victory over death and the devil, forgiveness of sin, the grace of God, the entire Christ, and the Holy Ghost with His gifts. 42] In short, it is so transcendent that if timid nature could realize it, it might well doubt whether it could be true. 43] For consider, if there were somewhere a physician who understood the art of saving men from dying, or, even though they died, of restoring them speedily to life, so that they would thereafter live forever, how the world would pour in money like snow and rain, so that because of the throng of the rich no one could find access! But here in Baptism there is brought free to every one's door such a treasure and medicine as utterly destroys death and preserves all men alive.
 Holy Baptism, LC, Holy Baptism

84] For this reason let every one esteem his Baptism as a daily dress in which he is to walk constantly, that he may ever be found in the faith and its fruits, that he suppress the old man and grow up in the new. 85] For if we would be Christians, we must practise the work whereby we are Christians. 86] But if any one fall away from it, let him again come into it. For just as Christ, the Mercy-seat, does not recede from us or forbid us to come to Him again, even though we sin, so all His treasure and gifts also remain. If, therefore, we have once in Baptism obtained forgiveness of sin, it will remain every day, as long as we live, that is, as long as we carry the old man about our neck. Holy Baptism, LC

20] Thus we have briefly the first point which relates to the essence of this Sacrament. Now examine further the efficacy and benefits on account of which really the Sacrament was instituted; which is also its most necessary part, that we may know what we should seek and obtain there. 21] Now this is plain and clear from the words just mentioned: This is My body and blood, given and shed for you, for the remission of sins. 22] Briefly that is as much as to say: For this reason we go to the Sacrament because there we receive such a treasure by and in which we obtain forgiveness of sins. Why so? Because the words stand here and give us this; for on this account He bids me eat and drink, that it may be my own and may benefit me, as a sure pledge and token, yea, the very same treasure that is appointed for me against my sins, death, and every calamity. LC, Holy C

28] But here our wise spirits contort themselves with their great art and wisdom, crying out and bawling: How can bread and wine forgive sins or strengthen faith? Although they hear and know that we do not say this of bread and wine, because in itself bread is bread, but of such bread and wine as is the body and blood of Christ, and has the words attached to it. That, we say, is verily the treasure, and nothing else, through which such forgiveness is obtained. 29] Now the only way in which it is conveyed and appropriated to us is in the words (Given and shed for you). For herein you have both truths, that it is the body and blood of Christ, and that it is yours as a treasure and gift. 30] Now the body of Christ can never be an unfruitful, vain thing, that effects or profits nothing. Yet, however great is the treasure in itself, it must be comprehended in the Word and administered to us, else we should never be able to know or seek it.

31] Therefore also it is vain talk when they say that the body and blood of Christ are not given and shed for us in the Lord's Supper, hence we could not have forgiveness of sins in the Sacrament. For although the work is accomplished and the forgiveness of sins acquired on the cross, yet it cannot come to us in any other way than through the Word. For what would we otherwise know about it, that such a thing was accomplished or was to be given us if it were not presented by preaching or the oral Word? Whence do they know of it, or how can they apprehend and appropriate to themselves the forgiveness, except they lay hold of and believe the Scriptures and the Gospel? 32] But now the entire Gospel and the article of the Creed: I believe a holy Christian Church, the forgiveness of sin, etc., are by the Word embodied in this Sacrament and presented to us. Why, then, should we allow this treasure to be torn from the Sacrament when they must confess that these are the very words which we hear every where in the Gospel, and they cannot say that these words in the Sacrament are of no use, as little as they dare say that the entire Gospel or Word of God, apart from the Sacrament, is of no use?

33] Thus we have the entire Sacrament, both as to what it is in itself and as to what it brings and profits. Now we must also see who is the person that receives this power and benefit. That is answered briefly, as we said above of Baptism and often elsewhere: Whoever believes it has what the words declare and bring. For they are not spoken or proclaimed to stone and wood, but to those who hear them, to whom He says: 34]Take and eat, etc. And because He offers and promises forgiveness of sin, it cannot be received otherwise than by faith. This faith He Himself demands in the Word when He says: Given and shed for you. As if He said: For this reason I give it, and bid you eat and drink, that you may claim it as yours and enjoy it. 35] Whoever now accepts these words, and believes that what they declare is true, has it. But whoever does not believe it has nothing, as he allows it to be offered to him in vain, and refuses to enjoy such a saving good. The treasure, indeed, is opened and placed at every one's door, yea, upon his table, but it is necessary that you also claim it, and confidently view it as the words suggest to you 36] This, now, is the entire Christian preparation for receiving this Sacrament worthily. For since this treasure is entirely presented in the words, it cannot be apprehended and appropriated in any other way than with the heart. For such a gift and eternal treasure cannot be seized with the fist. 37] Fasting and prayer, etc., may indeed be an external preparation and discipline for children, that the body may keep and bear itself modestly and reverently towards the body and blood of Christ; yet what is given in and with it the body cannot seize and appropriate. But this is done by the faith of the heart, which discerns this treasure and desires it. 38] This may suffice for what is necessary as a general instruction respecting this Sacrament; for what is further to be said of it belongs to another time.

39] In conclusion, since we have now the true understanding and doctrine of the Sacrament, there is indeed need of some admonition and exhortation, that men may not let so great a treasure which is daily administered and distributed among Christians pass by unheeded, that is, that those who would be Christians make ready to receive this venerable Sacrament often. 40] For we see that men seem weary and lazy with respect to it; and there is a great multitude of such as hear the Gospel, and, because the nonsense of the Pope has been abolished, and we are freed from his laws and coercion, go one, two, three years, or even longer without the Sacrament, as though they were such strong Christians that they have no need of it; 41] and some allow themselves to be prevented and deterred by the pretense that we have taught that no one should approach it except those who feel hunger and thirst, which urge them to it. Some pretend that it is a matter of liberty and not necessary, and that it is sufficient to believe without it; and thus for the most part they go so far that they become quite brutish, and finally despise both the Sacrament and the Word of God. LC, Holy C
66] For here He offers to us the entire treasure which He has brought for us from heaven, and to which He invites us also in other places with the greatest kindness, as when He says in St. Matthew 11:28: Come unto Me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 67] Now it is surely a sin and a shame that He so cordially and faithfully summons and exhorts us to our highest and greatest good, and we act so distantly with regard to it, and permit so long a time to pass [without partaking of the Sacrament] that we grow quite cold and hardened, so that we have no inclination or love for it. 68] We must never regard the Sacrament as something injurious from which we had better flee, but as a pure, wholesome, comforting remedy imparting salvation and comfort, which will cure you and give you life both in soul and body. For where the soul has recovered, the body also is relieved. Why, then, is it that we act as if it were a poison, the eating of which would bring death? LC, Holy C

Solid Dec
9] Concerning the righteousness of faith before God we believe, teach, and confess unanimously, in accordance with the comprehensive summary of our faith and confession presented above, that poor sinful man is justified before God, that is, absolved and declared free and exempt from all his sins, and from the sentence of well-deserved condemnation, and adopted into sonship and heirship of eternal life, without any merit or worth of our own, also without any preceding, present, or any subsequent works, out of pure grace, because of the sole merit, complete obedience, bitter suffering, death, and resurrection of our Lord Christ alone, whose obedience is reckoned to us for righteousness.

10] These treasures are offered us by the Holy Ghost in the promise of the holy Gospel; and faith alone is the only means by which we lay hold upon, accept, and apply, and appropriate them to ourselves. 11] This faith is a gift of God, by which we truly learn to know Christ, our Redeemer, in the Word of the Gospel, and trust in Him, that for the sake of His obedience alone we have the forgiveness of sins by grace, are regarded as godly and righteous by God the father, and are eternally saved. 12] Therefore it is considered and understood to be the same thing when Paul says that we are justified by faith, Rom. 3:28, or that faith is counted to us for righteousness, Rom. 4:5, and when he says that we are made righteous by the obedience of One, Rom. 5:19, or that by the righteousness of One justification of faith came to all men, Rom. 5:18. 13] For faith justifies, not for this cause and reason that it is so good a work and so fair a virtue, but because it lays hold of and accepts the merit of Christ in the promise of the holy Gospel; for this must be applied and appropriated to us by faith, if we are to be justified thereby. 14] Therefore the righteousness which is imputed to faith or to the believer out of pure grace is the obedience, suffering, and resurrection of Christ, since He has made satisfaction for us to the Law, and paid for [expiated] our sins. 15] For since Christ is not man alone, but God and man in one undivided person, He was as little subject to the Law, because He is the Lord of the Law, as He had to suffer and die as far as His person is concerned. For this reason, then, His obedience, not only in suffering and dying, but also in this, that He in our stead was voluntarily made under the Law, and fulfilled it by this obedience, is imputed to us for righteousness, so that, on account of this complete obedience, which He rendered His heavenly Father for us, by doing and suffering, in living and dying, God forgives our sins, regards us as godly and righteous, and eternally saves us. 16] This righteousness is offered us by the Holy Ghost through the Gospel and in the Sacraments, and is applied, appropriated, and received through faith, whence believers have reconciliation with God, forgiveness of sins, the grace of God, sonship, and heirship of eternal life. Formula, SD 3 Righteousness of Faith

Am I Laying a Burden on People?

$
0
0

Someone wrote that I was making him feel bad about being in the LCMS and what was he to do? I will not go into everything - I certainly understand how he feels.

Luther and the Evangelicals did not get together and form a new denomination. They taught the Word of God and were excommunicated or persecuted out or hated out of The Church.

As in the Reformation, the biggest problem today is in the leadership of the synods and schools. The worst are at the top and they are no going to leave their plush salaries, their deluxe benefits, and their light work-load. They not only suffer fools gladly, but promote them.

My opinion is that the WELS-ELS-CLC (sic) will collapse soon enough from their nastiness, abuse of people, and blatant false doctrine - encased and mummified from years of tradition. They venerate their traditions (like GA abuse) and worship dead leaders whom they place above Luther and the Reformers.

Jesus spoke often against the Pharisees of His day and the same tribe of the future. They are the Lutherans who navigate the shoals of false doctrine so they can enjoy their sinecures, honoring the 10,000 of being a good WELSian, Little Norwegian, or CLC despot.

I know there are a few good WELS pastors, but the supply will soon reach zero. I have my doubts about the Little Sect on the Prairie and the CLC (sic) having any pastors or leaders who comprehend and teach Justification by Faith, which is the Chief Article.

 Ouch! Spurgeon knew what was developing.
Many Babtist leaders today know the Gospel that UOJists deny, and that is Lutherdom's great shame.

Which synod to join or leave? - that is not the Chief Article. In the 19th century most Lutherans taught the Chief Article and honored the doctrinal, Biblical work of the Reformation. Nevertheless, Walther chose to divide Lutherans - even his own allies - with his idiotic notions borrowed from a diseased, neurologically compromised bishop of his own choosing.

Who was worse, Stephan and his female groupies, or Walther's circle of brainless bishop-disciples? Which was worse, having the Walther circle gather money from the cell groups, or Walther stealing all that money back and leaving the bishop in Illinois to die of syphilis?

Missouri is dying from its own mythology, but there is a lot of health left in the LCMS. As I wrote before, the strength of Missouri is its lack of unity. They have ELCA lite congregations, Lutheran congregations, and Walther Worship societies.

The Walther UOJ Worshipers are assassins, waiting to pounce upon and gratuitously insult anyone who questions their not-so-secret cult. But one LCMS pastor estimates there are 500 fellow clergy who teach Justification by Faith.

The lazy, fat clergy should not read the introduction, which
urges people to deprive them of food, bait them with dogs,
pelt them with manure, and drive them out of town.


I do not have the roadmap to those good congregations.

Sometimes I know. Usually I do not. Those who want an honest confession will find it, but not always locally.

I would like to see people worship in their own local congregation. I have directed people toward local churches first, if I have any  knowledge. Some find that there is nothing around them and worship with us through Ustream, live streaming and saved files.

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/bethany-lutheran-worship

Each one has an obligation to study the Scriptures and the Confessions. For example, both Catechisms are very good on this issue - about the first Three Commandments.

I do not mean a given edition. Does anyone realize that the "editions" are synodical Talmuds designed to brainwash their members? Luther did not write his Small Catechism and say, "I am not done here. Y'all need a massive expensive book to make this really effective." Thus Kuske replaced Gausewitz and Gausewitz did little more than provide Scripture for each section (as I recall).


 Jay Webber and the ELS love the False Gospel,
agreeing with Rambach, Walther, and other simpletons.

Jay Webber and Rolf Preus Reveal Their Massive Ignorance, But Little Else.

$
0
0
 A lay reader has asked me to keep him up-to-date about
the way Universal Forgiveness and Salvation (UOJ) is defended.


David Charles posted:
Is universal objective justification an official doctrine of Lutheranism?
LikeShow more reactions
Comment
Comments
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams While there are Lutheran denominations which deny it, it is a biblical teaching.
Manage
 · Reply · 4d
David Charles
David Charles Do you know of any Lutheran authorities who explain and expound this?
Manage
 · Reply · 4d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams I think you could go to Pieper where it is laid out.
Manage
 · Reply · 4d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Which denominations do you assert deny a biblical teaching on justification?
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams ELDoNA for one.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker They reject the term OUJ, and have some very valid complaints with this relatively new term, they do not reject the universal nature of the atonement.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams We're not talking about atonement. We're talking about justification. 

Well in 2000 years it's a relative new term. I do believe it's been around for at least the last 100 years. So most of our lifetimes.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker If by UOJ you mean that Christ died for all and won forgiveness for all, then yes, you are talking about the atonement. If by UOJ you mean something else... I am genuinely concerned.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker And yes, 100 years is VERY new, and should immediately raise red flags.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams What synod do you belong to?
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams It's fairly well accepted in the LCMS, WELS and ELS.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker What is fairly well accepted in LCMS, WELS, and ELS? The universal atonement? I agree, and confess that wholeheartedly. But if you're telling me that LCMS, WELS, and ELS confess that there are forgiven people in hell, I'm gonna have to ask you to cite your source.

What we're dealing with here is the difference between forgiveness WON and forgiveness RECEIVED. ELDoNA confesses with the rest of us that Christ won forgiveness for all. They also confess with the rest of us that forgiveness is received through faith. What they reject, and what all Lutheran bodies should reject, is the misuse of the term "justification" when applied to forgiveness WON, when it belongs to forgiveness RECEIVED.

So, that which you think UOJ means, I agree with. We confess the same thing: Christ won forgiveness for all on the cross. That to which ELDoNA objects as a body, and which many of us Lutherans in other synods reject as well, is the use of this new and foreign phrase "Universal Objective Justification." When you stop distinguishing between "Atonement" and "Justification" and decide to call both "Justification" thereby creating the necessity for the terms "Objective Justification" and "Subjective Justification" you create confusion.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Again, if you assert that UOJ means something other than "Christ won forgiveness for all on cross" then I am indeed concerned, but would like to hear your definition before passing judgment.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams Well, yes, that which is accepted in those bodies as objective justification which is detailed, I believe, in Pieper's dogmatics and published in most of their official publications. Btw, did you ever say to which synod to which you belonged. 

Eldona 
is in error concerning objective justification and the synod (whose name I don't recall at the moment) they used to be in fellowship or were they just talking did a fair job of answering of replying to Eldona's theses on justification.

I mean every objective proclamation of the Gospel through which the Holy Spirit creates and gives faith.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Yes, I've read both ends of the debate between WELS and ELDoNA, I have friends and connections in both synods. I am well aware of how both sides are effectively saying the exact same thing, and getting angry over semantics. ELDoNA is not in error concerning Objective Justification, they just reject using such an obfuscating term, especially when this term, if taken to its ultimate extreme, either demands that ALL will be in heaven, or that forgiven people will be in hell. Since both of those conclusions contradict Scripture, it's best if we stick to terminology that is proven to work, and does not lead to this confusion.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Again, what you mean by "UOJ" and what the words "UOJ" actually mean are two entirely different concepts. I don't disagree with you on the universality of the atonement, which is indeed what it appears you mean by UOJ. What I and many others have disagreed with is the improper use of the term UOJ to refer to the universal atonement, since the words "Universal Objective Justification" if understood simply, mean "All are right with God regardless of faith" and that is simply untrue.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams There are those who teach erroneously UOJ in a manner which is in error.

But the Synods' (sic) listed above official publications and teachings concerning it are not. I suggest you go read those because you seem to only focused on those individuals who teac
h an extreme form of it.

Can you say with Paul, "God was in Christ Jesus reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them."?

or "God justifies the ungodly" or Rom 3:23-24 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, (24) and [all] are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,?

Now it is true, these things must be believed in order to benefit from them and without faith one remains under God's wrath.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus ELDoNA is in error. They also speak falsely about the teaching of others. Here are some things I encourage you to read. http://christforus.org/.../HermanAmbergPreusonJustificati...Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker I'm focusing on the extreme error because the extreme error is the honest practice of UOJ. Those who hold to what you understand as UOJ are not holding to UOJ, but to the universal atonement.

Imagine there's a group of people who say "The sky is green
...See More
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus In the second article linked above, "Justificaton and the Sacrament," check out footnote #25 on page 8 for documentation that ELDoNA distorts the teaching of my father, falsely claiming that he changed his teaching on the topic near the end of his life.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Pr. Preus, I never said ELDoNA spoke perfectly. I accuse both sides of misunderstanding the other. That's been the entire point I've been trying to make this whole time. Because of the obfuscating terminology of "Objective Justification" I have seen men who ought to be brothers, because in doctrine they confess the same thing, rip each other apart and say horrible things about each other (I hold WELS, ELS, and ELDoNA all equally accountable for nasty language on this, I am not playing favourites) all because of wording that leads to misunderstandings.

Now, please answer my question. Do you confess that there are forgiven people in hell?
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles Austin Becker as you wait for the answer for your question, let me as you one: are there people in hell whose sins were propitiated in Christ on the cross?
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker David Charles, I confess with every Lutheran of sound doctrine in the last 500 years, and every Christian of sound doctrine in the last 2,000 years, that Christ's death on the cross was for every human who ever lived, and that Christ WON forgiveness for all. There is not one soul for whom Christ did not die.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles Austin Becker thank you for the clear answer. one more question: if the Lord Jesus suffered and paid the price of Judas betrayal as well as Peter's, if all the sins of all the people have been atoned for; that full satisfaction has been made to God's holy justice, then why do those in hell remain in hell?
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus The issue is really very simple. It is obfuscated by those who deny objective justification. John the Baptist said "Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world." Did he? That's the issue.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles Rolf Preus yes. but, there are something like a dozen ways the term "world" is used in Scripture. At any rate, thank you for the clear and thoughtful answers!
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber This paper documents the fact that the actual doctrine of objective justification, correctly conceived, has always been a Lutheran doctrine, even if the terminology is relatively recent: http://redeemerscottsdale.angelfire.com/.../WebberEmmausC...
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber Last year CPH published an English translation of the transcript of the debate between Jacob Andreae and Theodore Beza at the Colloquy of Montbeliard in 1586, under the title LUTHERANISM VS. CALVINISM. At this colloquy Andreae and Reformed theologian Theodore Beza debated the doctrines of the Lord’s Supper, the Person of Christ, Church Usages, Baptism, and Predestination. I am impressed by the way in which Andreae drew out from Beza various admissions that on their face are patently unbiblical, such as Beza’s belief that God does not love all people, only the elect. Here is an excerpt from Andreae’s comments on this point (which also, incidentally, can be seen to pertain to the subject of objective justification), on pp. 618-19:

<<...John 3[:16]: God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that everyone who believes in him may not perish but rather have eternal life. ... In these words of Christ, what is undoubtedly and certainly understood by the term “THE WORLD,” in the judgment and unanimous consensus of all writers and interpreters of the holy Scripture, the old ones and the new ones, is the universal human race. But Christ himself is the best interpreter of his own words, and he confirms this in the same passage in very plain words when he says, This is the judgment: that light has come into the world, and the world loved darkness more than the light (John 3[:19]). Here the term THE WORLD cannot be interpreted about the elect only, but rather it is especially about those who are rejected and damned. For they love the darkness more than the light. And they are damned who, even though God so loved them that he gave his Son for them, nevertheless themselves despise and scorn this gift and are judged and damned on this account. John the Baptist confirms the same thing, who when he pointed out Christ, said, Behold the lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world (John 1[:29]). OF THE WORLD, he says, not of the elect. Thus it is written in Romans 5[:10]: For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, how much more will we, having been reconciled, be saved in his life. And 2 Corinthians 5: God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not counting their transgressions against them. And he placed in us the word of reconciliation. We function therefore as embassy for Christ, as God exhorting through us. We beg on Christ’s behalf: be reconciled to God.>>
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
John C. Drosendahl
John C. Drosendahl Austin Becker ELDoNA's argument seems to be with St. Paul in Romans who clearly applies the term "justification" to all.
Manage
 · Reply · 3d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker I am attempting to interpret both sides of this debate charitably, and to assume nothing nefarious from either LCMS/WELS/ELS or ELDoNA. I am well aware of what both sides have to say about each other. What I am asking for is a simple answer to a simple question. Because I believe we all answer that question the same way, which is what convinces me this is a matter of terminology, not of actual doctrine.

Are there forgiven people in hell?
Manage
 · Reply · 2d · Edited
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams define forgiven people.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Are there people in hell who have received the forgiveness of sins and so been declared "not guilty" before God?
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams There is no one in hell who has faith in Christ for the forgiveness of sins and who have received or retained the forgiveness of sins at the point of death.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Good, then indeed we all agree. No one who has received and retained the forgiveness of sins is in hell. Then I maintain my affirmation that this argument comes down 100% to terminology and its implications, not to actual doctrinal differences.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
John C. Drosendahl
John C. Drosendahl Austin Becker, the problem you seem to be having is that you wish to equate terms which are not the same. "atoned for", "justified", "forgiven", and "saved" are all unique terms which have their own nuances and denotations. They are not synonyms.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams It has to do with what saving message can I proclaim to sinners to bring them to faith without falling into the Arminian trap of freewill and/or turning faith into work that saves us.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
John C. Drosendahl
John C. Drosendahl Indeed, Guillaume. I don't know how ELDoNA folks can preach Paul's inspired words in Romans without robbing them of their God-given denotations.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus The critical question is whether Jesus took away the sin of the world. Did God forgive this entire world of sinners for the sake of Christ's vicarious suffering and death? The various soteriological terms entail each other. If the world is redeemed, the world is forgiven, and God is propitiated. To assert a univeral redemption while denying a universal justification is to change the meaning of redeem.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams Rolf Preus flesh that out a bit Rolf.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber The Atonement does not simply make God to be neutral toward humanity rather than wrathful, until such time as individual humans repent and believe. It makes him to be forgiving toward humanity, in Christ.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber But of course, outside of Christ, God's wrath against human sin remains.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d · Edited
Austin Becker
Austin Becker Pr. Drosendahl, I do agree that these words are not synonyms. On that point, indeed on every point made by you, by Pr. Webber, and by everyone else in this discussion, you and I are in full agreement.

I think at this juncture, I am going to bow out of
...See More
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus To redeem is to set free by the payment of the ransom price. Folks who claim to teach a universal redemption while denying universal justification will define redeem in such a way that it has Jesus making the payment but without effecting that for whi...See More
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
John C. Drosendahl
John C. Drosendahl It's both an expiation and a propitiation, is it not?
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Rolf Preus
Rolf Preus Yes. The one entails the other. Deniers of objective justification, however, are forced by that denial to redefine the various soteriological terms so as to avoid contradicting themselves.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber I used to think that this was also a mere battle over words, and a big misunderstanding. But, the men of ELDoNA have rejected clear, balanced, and Christ-centered presentations of objective justification, and not just the clumsy and poorly-worded versions. So, while I, too, have friends among ELDoNA pastors - including a particularly close friend - I also need to admit, sadly, that we have a doctrinal difference.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d · Edited
Dave Schumacher
Dave Schumacher "Are there forgiven people in Hell?"
There are only forgiven people in Hell. Christ took away the sins of the world.
Those in Hell did not believe.
Manage
 · Reply · 2d
Dave Schumacher
Dave Schumacher Austin Becker, you and I do not agree on what "Jesus won forgiveness for all" means.
Rolf Preus - did you read this book?



 Jay, have you studied the Book of Concord?
Please show some evidence of that, instead of quoting some obscure conference, Rev. Superficial.

 Boys, boys, the Formula of Concord commends this work
for those who want to study the topic of Justification more thoroughly. Has anyone on the forum read it carefully? 
 The Right Reverend Bishop James Heiser, STM, worked with the Rolf Synod, which zealously advocated UOJ. I challenged Heiser about Rolf's position, but he was indifferent. He said, "They will get rid of Rolf." And they did.

Here is another ELDONA-Rolf Synod joint meeting,
published by Heiser, who told me that he recognized the error of UOJ after he read Thy Strong Word in 2000.
 Here is a primer for those who want to know basic Lutheran, Biblical doctrine.

 This is a good movie about the actual (still lost) Lost Dutchman's Goldmine, which too many Lutherans pursue via Thrivent and various foundations.  They lay up for themselves treasures on earth, as St. Marvin Schwan did.

An Example for the People Asking about Laying a Burden on Them

$
0
0
 Read this post on laying a burden on people.

If you read through the comments made on the "Confessional" Lutheran forum, you will see a total lack of argumentation from the Scriptures or the Book of Concord.

If there is a burden, the burden for laity is to know the Scriptures better than these lazy, self-important clergy. But I would call that a call to arms, not a burden. Conflict gives us energy to study the truth that they are trying to steal from future generations.

And the Confessions? Those clergy know more about hieratic Egyptian than they know about the Book of Concord. And yet they yap into the night. So laity can discover the joy of reading the non-synodical Book of Concord - clear and concise confessions of the truth of the Scriptures.



Should I Have Defended Austin in the UOJ Discussion?

$
0
0
 Here is the recent discussion from Facebook.


Reader - "I was waiting for you or someone to come onto the thread to Austin’s defense. I do respect his strong desire to (a) bring clarity to everyone involved and (b) defend his belief that the differences are terminological (a word?) and not essential or actual. It does seem to be true that many people (including my old WELS pastor) equate “Objective Justification” in the UOJ scheme with the atonement and argue from this perspective."

Was Abraham already justified in advance, then by faith,
using the dense, dunce language of UOJ?


GJ - I was never exactly clear about what Austin was writing - not his fault. I had a truncated list of comments and did not want to pursue every detail.

The normal UOJ crew showed up to defend rationalistic Pietism, so poorly that they probably caused several people to repent of ever venerating such a ridiculous bucket of lies, distortions, and misinterpretations.

Objective Justification is not the Atonement. Robert Preus said so, and the wording above is obvious, apart from that factoid from Robert.

All these terms - below - mean the same thing - that God has already declared the entire world forgiven and saved:

  1. General Justification
  2. The Justification of the World
  3. Objective Justification
  4. Universal Objective Justification
  5. Absolution of the world when Christ rose (or perhaps when Christ died - no one is sure).


The word in common with four of the five terms is the word Justification - which truly means God's declaration. That is where they start contradicting themselves, beyond the false foundation of their lies, that one event (the cross) or the other (resurrection) equates with God declaring the entire world forgiven, regardless of faith.

If God has already declared the world forgiven, why does anyone need repentance, baptism, forgiveness, Holy Communion?

Some participants clearly define the error of the UOJ Stormtroopers. Others blow smoke with their prissy, fussy attempts at justification via the history of doctrine. These Pharisees love to parade with the footnotes, hemming and hawing, but they never have the energy to teach from the Word or the Book of Concord, from Luther or Melanchthon, Chemnitz or Gerhard.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/252399584853848/#

Chris Black If we are saved by universal justification why be baptized, why go to church, why receive the Lords supper if everything is just so automatic.
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber Another example of a false alternative would be to ask, If we are justified by faith, then why did Jesus need to be born, die, and rise again? Obviously this question is wrongly put. So too is the question, If we are justified by faith, why did God need to declare the world of sinners for which Christ died and rose again to be righteous and acceptable in Christ?

Objective justification as such is not about individual sinners, but it is about Jesus and the world of sinners for which he died and rose again. When God's justification of humanity in Christ starts to get individuated, that is the stuff of subjective justification. Objective justification is the justification that is true for everyone in and because of Christ (but not outside of Christ), and that is offered to everyone in the means of grace, so that individuals who repent of their sin under the judgment of the law, and believe in the gospel, are (subjectively) justified by faith.

To be justified by faith is to receive justification by means of faith. God does not create a separate justification for every believer in the moment of the believer's act of faith. Faith receives a justification that already exists for everyone in Christ. This is why we are justified by faith, and not only in faith. The Lutheran distinction is that we are justified by faith and not by works. The Lutheran distinction is not that we are justified by faith and not by Christ. Objective justification does not contradict the true meaning of justification by faith, but it explicates the true meaning of justification by Christ.

Manage


 · Reply · 3d · Edited
Walter Raffel
Walter Raffel This is double talk.
Manage


 · Reply · 2d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams I think we saw the problem earlier when I asked the other gentleman to define forgiven sinners in hell. What he meant by that is sinners in hell who had received the forgiveness of sins, which of course an impossibility and not to what we mean by UOJ.
Manage


 · Reply · 2d
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber Not only is this not double talk, but this is the objective fullness of the gospel that is delivered to and bestowed upon penitent sinners in the means of grace. In the gospel God is not making a proposal that sins will or might be forgiven under certain conditions. In the gospel God is delivering and bestowing forgiveness to those who repent of their sins.
Manage


 · Reply · 2d
Matthew Lush
Matthew LushGroup Admin Chris your statements are false, no one claims we are saved subjectively, your misunderstanding shouldn’t lead to further false accusations. Rather than talk at the group maybe ask for clarification.
Manage


 · Reply · 1d

 This is a howling lie from Sig Becker.
The early Missouri Synod taught Justification by Faith and the LCMS still has no official position endorsing UOJ. CPH sells a Small Catechism entirely lacking the "precious doctrine of objective justification."


Guillaume Williams We are not saved by objective justification, non-subjective justification or universal justification. We are saved by Christ who is our justification.
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
David Charles
David Charles Ok, slow down a little please :-) does this doctrine teach that all are declared righteous in the righteousness of Christ?

That Hitler and Luther alike are righteous before God?
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
David Charles
David Charles at their baptism
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams I think it depends on your perspective.
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
David Charles
David Charles *your* perspective. you clearly know more about this than me, so, I am your student :-)
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
Guillaume Williams
Guillaume Williams Or their perspective.

Faith alone (which is a gift of God given through the Word and Sacraments) receives forgiveness of sin, life, and salvation.


Oh, if you are my student, first go read everything listed above and then come back with a 3 page report or at least a "oh" or "yeah, no."

Manage


 · Reply · 4d
David Charles
David Charles will do - well, not all. one link wants me to download something. I don't ever do that :-)
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
Guillaume Williams

 · Reply · 4d
Guillaume Williams

 · Reply · 4d
Marvin Nelson
Marvin Nelson David Charles there is objective justification, and Christ died for both Luther and Hitler, it is not universalism but general atonement to which it leads because there is also subjective justification which needs to be taught in conjunction with objective justification.
Manage


 · Reply · 4d
Jason Harris
Jason Harris Hitler and Luther were both declared just, but Hitler apparently rejected it and was condemned as far as we can guess.

Jesus: Father forgive them...

Hitler: Screw you, buddy. I don't need your forgiveness.

Sue Koehler Meredith "We treat of the forgiveness of sins in two ways. First, how it is achieved and won. Second, how it is distributed and given to us. Christ has achieved it on the cross, it is true. But he has not distributed or given it on the cross. He has not won it in the supper or sacrament. There he has distributed and given it through the Word, as also in the gospel, where it is preached. He has won it once and for all on the cross. But the distribution takes place continuously, before and after, from the beginning to the end of the world" (Luther’s Works, vol. 40, pp. 213-214)
Manage


 · Reply · 3d · Edited
Jim Hearn
Jim Hearn Ichabod comment in 3....2....1.....
Manage


 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles i don't get it - but, I want too
Manage


 · Reply · 3d
Jim Schulz
Jim Schulz David Charles It's called "poisoning the well."
Manage


 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles the comment by Jim or the one he is expecting?
Manage


 · Reply · 3d
David Charles
David Charles Man, and I thought us Calvinist were complicated :-) :-)
Manage


 · Reply · 3d
David Charles

 · Reply · 3d
Jim Hearn
Jim Hearn Meh. (*Eyes glazing*) Let the pastors haggle over the UOJ topic.

We all know the church growth movement and the corresponding march of mainline congregations toward non-denominationalism are far more interesting topics.

Manage


 · Reply · 2d · Edited

Magnus Nørgaard Sørensen If we look in the Formula of Concord, the thing which allready exist and is received and imputed through faith is the righteousness of Christ. The term universal justification is of huberian and moravian origin. 
To be sure - I am willing to speak abou
t universal objective justification as a forensic act, whereby the righteousness of Christ, which avails before God for the world, was declared by God in his resurrection on account of his active and passive obedience. This is the poasition of the old synodical conference, which corresponds doctrinally with the Lutheran Dogmaticians in spite of the fact that it does not agree with it in terminology. As one can see from the 1872-essay, they quoted the middle-position of swedish Anders Norhborg favorably. 
But we should be aware of the false moravian teaching, whereby that which Scripture and our confessions term justification is no longer seen as a real and distinct fporensic act bu reduced to the mere congitive act of recognizing something that is alreay a fact. This in my opnion is what was taught by Siegbert Becker and is also taught by leading by Seth Erlandsson in the swedish sisterchurch of the WELS.
The mere adherence to the term UOJ does not mean much. Neither does the rejection of the term. I think the biggest problem in the American discussion is that it is often assumed by both sides that the same thing is meant by the term.

Manage


 · Reply · 1d
Joe Jewell
Joe Jewell This is an interesting take! I’m not that knowledgeable about Scandinavian theologians in general. Are any of them cited in either “side” of the UOJ debate among American Lutherans?
Manage


 · Reply · 23h
Magnus Nørgaard Sørensen
Magnus Nørgaard Sørensen Joe Jewell If you are interested, you can read a paper, I wrote about it: https://www.academia.edu/.../The_Justification_of_Christ...
In Sweden, Tom Hardt, who taught UPJ, attacked BEcker and Erlandsson, and his critique was almost identical with Rune 
Söderlunds - who rejected the term, but accepted the version of Anders Nohrborg as. Tom Hardts essay is part of the Festschrift for Robert Preus (you can also find it here: http://luk.se/Justification-Easter.htm - the critique of Becker and Erlandsson is in note 75). One of the editors, Kurt Marquart, had issues with Hardts Critique but later - after Kokomo - he admitted that Tom Hardt was right, and Marquart himself attacked Becker. You can find Marquarts criticism of Becker here: http://www.patheos.com/.../rev-dr-kurt-marquart.../
Manage

 · Reply · 22h
Nick Haasch
Nick Haasch Thanks for the reading material Magnus. I've been trying to follow this all as well, reading essays and books from both sides.
Manage


 · Reply · 20h
David Jay Webber
David Jay Webber Thanks for an interesting paper. It should also be noted that WELS District President Jon Buchholz, who is the most influential teacher and defender of objective Justification in the WELS of today, explicitly embraces the form of teaching found in Gerhard and Walther, explicitly repudiates the Kokomo Theses, and explicitly criticizes Siegbert Becker for his tolerance of the Kokomo Theses.
http://azcadistrict.com/.../papers/Buchholz_2012-10.pdf

Manage


 · Reply · 19h · Edited
Magnus Nørgaard Sørensen
Magnus Nørgaard Sørensen Thank you. I will have to look into Buchhoz.
Manage


 · Reply · 11h
Anders Nissen
Anders Nissen I should be noted that the Kokomo statement was drafted by persons that did not agree with the teaching of objective justification, in order to criticize the doctrine. It would therefore make no sense for Becker to say to the drafters about the theses, “Throw them out and start over!”, as Buchholz suggests he should have done. The drafters did not intend to give a fair presentation in the first place. 

Regarding Becker’s tolerance ot the statement, this is what he says:

”Every one of the statements can be understood correctly, even though one must swallow a little hard to accede to the fourth. However, because the statements were used to discredit the truth of universal justification and to cause other laymen to doubt this teaching it is especially necessary to point out that the statements do not contain false doctrine.” http://www.wlsessays.net/.../331/BeckerJustification.pdf... 

And at the end ot the paper:
”What shall we say of the four statements? It would have been better if the Kokomo laymen had simply been told, ’Since you refuse to accept the clear teaching of the Bible that God has for Christ’s sake already forgiven the sins of the world, and since you are not willing to be treated as weak Christians but persist in <doubtful disputations> (Ro 14:1), we can no longer tolerate your propaganda against the doctrine of our church or consider you to be in fellowship with us.’ 
Three of the four statements, because of their lack of clarity, tend to confuse the issue. But since the disciplined laymen used them to advance their false doctrine, it was understandable that the congregation should also use them in its rejection of the falsehood being advocated. I do not consider any of the four statements to be false doctrine, but I would rather not use the language used in the first, second, and fourth.”
Manage


 · Reply · 3h · Edited
Jeff Pautz

Reply to this...



Matthias Leyrer
Matthias Leyrer Where's Ichabod when you need him?


Lay Reader Reflects on the Facebook "Confessional" Lutheran Forum UOJ Group-Hug. Did They Kilcrease It?

$
0
0
Funny how people erase (kilcrease) what they have written.


My second post on the "Confessional" Lutheran Forum's UOJ.

First Post on the "Confusional" Lutheran Forum's UOJ

And...it seems to be gone. Laity posting and refuting the UOJ perps made the false teachers look silly, confused, and dishonest.

The laity know the Scriptures better than the self-appointed UOJ hucksters. Non-clergy are trained by the Word, not brained by the bullies of Universalism, so they ask for Justification by Faith posts.


Dr. Jackson,

Good post.  This has been pretty much my assessment, except maybe there might be a realignment across synod lines --maybe, won't hold my breath on that one.

"As I wrote before, the strength of Missouri is its lack of unity."

I think back with some irony that a couple of decades ago that the strength of the WELS was its unity, but now it is clear that it's a stumbling block.....and a serious one.  And, even the well meaning pastors in the WELS are too timid to stand up for the faith, rather they stand up for the synod.  They are a very tight bunch.  There are a few mavericks, but they are older men.

This UOJ thing really seemed OK on the surface when it was presented to me years ago as the OJ/SJ package, but after reading your posts I've taken another look at it, and I have to ask myself why???  Why do they need to defend this thing so badly?

They'll tell you that without it somehow the work of Christ is diminished, but I submit the effect is quite the opposite because it cheapens the Gospel.  Why?  Because by declaring the world justified it becomes impersonal, since SJ (or more properly, justification by faith) is left as a footnote.  Indeed, UOJ depersonalizes the Gospel as it lumps people together.  It's all the same.  Certainly all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, but I believe that passage isn't a corporate application -- no real help to the guy with a burdened conscience.  He may be making comparisons to others, and the groupthink is no help to him.  He needs to know that his sins are forgiven.....even his sins are forgiven. This is the beauty of the Gospel as it justifies by faith.  He knows that we are not judged corporately, so why would he buy corporate justification or forgiveness.  We're not talking about pronouncing forgiveness in a church service; we're talking about UOJ.

I believe this UOJ belittles a man's sins in a destructive way when it lumps them all together.  Sin is personal -- not corporate.  Simply stating that Jesus made atonement for the whole world doesn't in any way belittle.  2 Corinthians 5:21 really gets overworked, and if it were to fit UOJ it might read:  "For the world's sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that the world might become the righteousness of God" -- which is preposterous, but how else can anyone come to the conclusion that the world is justified.  After all, a man is either justified or not.  Does a man have to be double justified to be justified?!?

Again, I don't see why we need UOJ, and I certainly don't see this fear of fideism.  Faith in Christ isn't faith in faith.  And, faith isn't a work -- it can't be.  A man either trusts God or not.  He can't just arbitrarily decide to believe.  The Word does the work.  Period.






Time for My "Whisper Low in Jerusalem" Graphic. Universal Objective Justification Must Whisper Low on Facebook Lest the Dogma Be Heard and Understood! in the Pews of Gath

$
0
0


I did not join the discussion because I was kicked off the board some time ago. I impetuously said that a Southern Seminary education (ELCA) explained all I needed to know about one moderator's position. That seminary is now a college department.

I posted large parts of the discussion because one of our church members wanted to see how UOJ hucksters argued their case.

My second post on the "Confessional" Lutheran Forum's UOJ.

First Post on the "Confusional" Lutheran Forum's UOJ



Rolf Preus is a great authority on UOJ. I can tell because he always links his own blog as the last word on the topic, in hopes of boosting his monthly pageviews above two digits. However, he offers no evidence of studying the topic or reading Justification and Rome, which he supposedly edited with his brother.

Rolf is terribly offended that I quote his father's last book. He must have confused Justification and Rome with their private Preus Family publishing effort. Scholarly books are meant to be studied, debated, and quoted, with or without the approval of kin.

 A running joke is Jay Webber's ceaseless praise of Jon-Boy Buchholz as a theologian. Compared to Jay's middler-year abilities, it must be awe-inspiring.

The funnest part of the discussion came when Webber and others wanted to compare the slant of obscure theologians on the topic, to determine why one branch of UOJ was better than another.  Navigating between those "bad and good expressions" of OUJ is like picking a favorite toxin. Buchholz stood before the WELS convention and declared the entire world was forgiven and saved. "Period. End of story." No rocks were thrown, no tomatoes tossed. In WELS, those projectiles are saved for anyone teaching the Chief ArticleJustification by Faith.

Anyone can start with a key Justification by Faith passage and move back and forth across the Scriptures to add insights and perspective.

These hipsters must have excellent vision, because they can find UOJ in the midst of a Justification by Faith passage. Better, they can only remember a citation and a phrase, ignoring its context. Relentless Rolf Preus repeated"raised for our justification Romans 4:25" for years. Thus a convention document, the Brief Statement of 1932, welded Romans 4:25 into many a seminarian's brain.

Did they stop to study Romans 4? Seminary supposedly teaches young brains to work on the New Testament in Greek. The chapter is so clear:

  1. Abraham was justified by faith. He believed the Messianic Promises about being the father of many nations, a pivotal issue in John 8 - "Before Abraham was, I AM."
  2. Abraham is not alone in having righteousness imputed (counted). Imputation is another name for God's declaration.
  3. If we believe (a bitter pill for UOJ) in the One who raised Him from the dead, we are also forgiven. He was delivered for our sins and raised for our justification.
Is not the resurrection of Christ the foundation of our faith in Him? No other event in the Bible gathers together so many Promises and reveals the power of God so well. Romans 4 is not only a faith chapter, but also a Justification by Faith chapter, summarized by Romans 5:1-2.


Romans 4:21  And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. 22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. 23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; 24 But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; 25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

5 Therefore* being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: 2 By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

*Therefore, in Greek, is a soft bridge between one statement and another. The Bible does not use chapter and verse numbers but grammatical signals, like "therefore." To find UOJ in Romans 4:25 is a prodigal feat of obstinate blindness, since Romans 5 is the definition and explanation of Romans 4:24-25 as Justification by Faith.


Grace is "world absolution" in the mind of Bishop Stephan's disciple and enabler. ELCA agrees with Walther about this.


So these peddlers of pedestrian poison insist that here and there - throughout the Bible - God inserts their foundational dogma, that all are are forgiven and saved without faith, just so some can hear this and make a decision for world absolution without faith. This is the only dogmatic formula that excludes faith completely and dares to hide in the shadow of the sola list - by Scripture alone, by grace alone, by faith alone. True, we can grant UOJ artists a few examples of sola:

  • Without reading
  • Without comprehension
  • Without spiritual discernment
  • Without Luther
  • Without Melanchthon
  • Without Andreae
  • Without Chytraeus
  • Without Chemnitz
  • Without P. Leyser
  • Without Gerhard
  • Without Henry E. Jacobs
  • Without Krauth
  • Without Schmauk
  • Without the 1905 Missouri catechism
  • Without Gausewitz
  • Without the last book of Robert Preus, Justification and Rome.

Lest this jeremiad be incomplete, it should be mentioned that the UOJ parasites grossly insult the Biblical doctrines of grace and faith, making it appear that one is the enemy of the other.

Thus they stumble about, like blindfolded drunks in a shop, breaking everything but somehow finding the cash register and emptying it of all but the pennies.

 Thus God is passing judgment on WELS for repudiating the Gospel and selling their hideous New NIVs to cover up the stench.

Luther's Sermon on the Temptation of Christ. Matthew 4:1-11. Invocavit Sunday

$
0
0


INVOCAVIT. FIRST SUNDAY IN LENT




TEXT: Matthew 4:1-11. Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he afterward hungered. And the tempter came and said unto him, If thou art the Son of God, command that these stones become bread. But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. Then the devil taketh him into the holy city; and he set him on the pinnacle of the temple, and saith unto him, if thou art the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and, On their hands they shall bear thee up, lest haply thou dash thy foot against a stone.

Jesus said unto him, Again it is written, Thou shalt not make trial of the Lord thy God. Again, the devil taketh him unto an exceeding high mountain, and showeth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; and he said unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. Then the devil leaveth him; and behold, angels came and ministered unto him.


I. THE FASTING OF CHRIST.

1. This Gospel is read today at the beginning of Lent in order to picture before Christians the example of Christ, that they may rightly observe Lent, which has become mere mockery: first, because no one can follow this example and fast forty days and nights as Christ did without eating any food. Christ rather followed the example of Moses, who fasted also forty days and nights, when he received the law of God on mount Sinai. Thus Christ also wished to fast when he was about to bring to us, and give expression to, the new law. In the second place, Lent has become mere mockery because our fasting is a perversion and an institution of man. For although Christ did fast forty days, yet there is no word of his that he requires us to do the same and fast as he did. Indeed he did many other things, which he wishes us not to do; but whatever he calls us to do or leave undone, we should see to it that we have his Word to support our actions.

2. But the worst of all is that we have adopted and practiced fasting as a good work: not to bring our flesh into subjection; but, as a meritorious work before God, to atone for our sins and obtain grace. And it is this that has made our fasting a stench and so blasphemous and shameful, so that no drinking and eating, no gluttony and drunkenness, could have been as bad and foul. It would have been better had people been drunk day and night than to fast thus. Moreover, even if all had gone well and right, so that their fasting had been applied to the mortification of the flesh; but since it was not voluntary, and it was not left to each to do according to their own free will, but was compulsory by virtue of human commandment, and they did it unwillingly, it was all lost and to no purpose. I will not mention the many other evils as the consequences, as that pregnant mothers and their offspring, the sick and the weak, were thereby ruined, so that it might be called a fasting of Satan instead of a fasting unto holiness. Therefore we will carefully consider how this Gospel teaches us by the example of Christ what true fasting is.

3. The Scriptures present to us two kinds of true fasting: one, by which we try to bring the flesh into subjection to the spirit, of which St. Paul speaks in 2 Corinthians 6:5: “ In labors, in watchings, in fastings.” The other is that which we must bear patiently, and yet receive willingly because of our need and poverty, of which St. Paul speaks in 1 Corinthians 4:11: “Even unto this present hour we both hunger, and thirst,” and Christ in Matthew 9:15: “When the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, then will they fast.” This kind of fasting Christ teaches us here while in the wilderness alone without anything to eat, and while he suffers his penury without murmuring. The first kind of fasting, one can end whenever he wills, and can satisfy it by food; but the other kind we must observe and bear until God himself changes it and satisfies us. Hence it is much more precious than the first, because it moves in greater faith.

4. This is also the reason that the Evangelist with great care places it first:

Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness, that he might there fast and be tempted, so that no one might imitate his example of their own choice and make of it a selfish, arbitrary, and pleasant fasting; but instead wait for the Spirit, who will send him enough fastings and temptations. For whoever, without being led by the Spirit, wantonly resorts to the danger of hunger or to any temptation, when it is truly a blessing of God that he can eat and drink and have other comforts, tempts God. We should not seek want and temptation, they will surely come of themselves; we ought then do our best and act honestly. The text reads: Jesus was led up of the Spirit into the wilderness; and not: Jesus himself chose to go into the wilderness. “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.” Romans 8:14. God gives his blessings for the purpose that we may use them with thanksgiving, and not that we may let them lie idle, and thus tempt him; for he wishes it, and forces us to fast by the Spirit or by a need which we cannot avoid.

5. This narrative, however, is written both for our instruction and admonition. First, for instruction, that we should know how Christ has served and helped us by his fasting, hunger, temptation and victory; also that who ever believes on Christ shall never suffer need, and that temptation shall never harm him; but we shall have enough in the midst of want and be safe in the midst of temptation; because his Lord and Head triumphed over these all in his behalf, and of this he is assured, as Christ says in John 16:33: “Be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.”

God, who was able to nourish Christ forty days without any food, can nourish also his Christians.

6. Secondly, this is written for our admonition, that we may in the light of this example also cheerfully suffer want and temptation for the service of God and the good of our neighbor, like Christ did for us, as often as necessity requires it; which is surely accomplished if we learn and confess God’s Word. Therefore this Gospel is sweet consolation and power against the unbelief and infamy of the stomach, to awaken and strengthen the conscience, that we may not be anxious about the nourishment of our bodies, but be assured that he can and will give us our daily bread.

II. THE TEMPTATION OF CHRIST.

7. But as to how temptation takes place and how it is overcome, is all very beautifully pictured to us here in Christ. First, that he is led up into the wilderness, that is, he is left solitary and alone by God, angels and men, by all creatures. What kind of a temptation would it be, if we were not forsaken and stood not alone? It is, however, painful when we do not feel anything that presents its back to us; as for example, that I should support myself and have not a nickel, not a thread, not a twig, and I experience no help from others, and no advice is offered. That means to be led into the desert and to be left alone. There I am in the true school, and I learn what I am, how weak my faith is, how great and rare true faith is, and how deeply unbelief is entrenched in the hearts of all men. But whoever has his purse, cellar and fields full, is not yet led into the desert, neither is he left alone; therefore he is not conscious of temptation.

8. Secondly, the tempter came forward and attacked Christ with these very same cares of food for the body and with the unbelief in the goodness of God, and said: “If thou art the Son of God, command that these stones become bread,” as if he should say: Yes, trust thou in God and bake and cook nothing; only wait patiently until a roasted fowl flies into your mouth; do you now say that you have a God who cares for you; where is now your heavenly Father, who has charge of you? Yea, it seems to me he lets you in a fine condition; eat now and drink from your faith, let us see how you will satisfy your hunger; yea, when you have stones for bread. What a fine Son of God you are! How fatherly he is disposed toward you in that he fails to send you a slice of bread and permits you to be so poor and needy; do you now continue to believe that you are his son and he is your father? With like thoughts he truly attacks all the children of God. And Christ surely felt this temptation, for he was no stock nor stone; although he was and remained pure and without sin, as we cannot do.

9. That Satan attacked Christ with the cares for daily food or with unbelief and avarice, Christ’s answer proves, in that he says: “Man shall not live by bread alone;” that sounds as if he said: thou wilt direct me to bread alone and dost treat me as though I thought of nothing but the sustenance of my body. This temptation is very common also among pious people, and they especially feel it keenly who have children and a family, and have nothing to eat. Therefore St. Paul says in 1 Timothy 6:10 that avarice is a root of all kind of evil; for it is a fruit of unbelief. Do you not think that unbelief, care and avarice are the reasons people are afraid to enter married life?

Why do people avoid it and live in unchastity, unless it be the fear that they must die of hunger and suffer want? But here we should consider Christ’s work and example, who suffered want forty days and nights, and finally was not forsaken, but was ministered to even by angels.

10. Thirdly, behold how Christ resists this temptation of bread, and overcomes; he sees nothing but stones and what is uneatable, then he approaches and clings to the Word of God, strengthens himself by it and strikes the devil to the ground with it. This saying all Christians should lay hold of when they see that there is lack and want and everything has become stones, so that courage trembles, and they should say: What were it if the whole world were full of bread, still man does not live by bread alone, but more belongs to life, namely, the Word of God. The words, however, are so beautiful and powerful that we must not pass over them lightly, but carefully explain them.

11. These words Christ quotes from Deuteronomy 8:3, where Moses says: “Thy God humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by everything that proceedeth out of the mouth of Jehovah doth man live.”

That is as much as to say: Since God permits you to hunger and you still continue to live, you ought indeed to grasp the thought that God nourishes you without bread through his Word; for if you should live and sustain yourself by bread alone then you must continually be full of bread. But the Word, that nourishes us is, that he promises us and causes it to be published that he is our God and desires to be our God.

12. Thus now the meaning of Moses and of Christ is: Whoever has here God’s Word and believes, has both blessings; the first, where he is in want and has nothing, but must suffer hunger, that Word will sustain him, so that he will not die of hunger nor perish, just as well as if he had abundance to eat; for the Word he has in his heart nourishes and sustains him without eating and drinking. But has he little to eat, then a bite or slice of bread will feed and nourish him like a kingly meal; for not only bread but the Word of God also nourishes the body naturally, as it creates and upholds all things, Hebrews 1:3. The other blessing he will also enjoy, namely, that finally bread will surely be at hand, come whence it will, and should it rain from heaven like manna where none grows and none can grow. In these two thoughts every person can freely trust, namely, that he must in time of hunger receive bread or something to eat, or if not, then his hunger must become so moderate and bearable that it will nourish him even as well as bread does.

13. What has been said of eating and feeding the body should be understood also of drinking, clothing, house, and all our needs: namely that although he still permits us to become naked and suffer want for clothing, house etc., clothing must finally be at hand, and before it fails the leaves of the trees must become coats and mantles; or if not, then the coats and garments that we wear must never grow old; just as happened to the Children of Israel in the desert Deuteronomy 8:2-4, whose clothing and shoes never wore out. Likewise the wild wilderness must become their houses, and there must be a way where there is no way; and water, where there is no water; stones must become water. For here stands God’s Word, which says: “He cares for you;” and St. Paul in 1 Timothy 6:17: “God giveth us richly all things to enjoy;” and Matthew 6:33-34: “But seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Be not therefore anxious for the morrow.” These and like words must continue true and stand forever firm.

14. All this one may indeed learn from his own daily experiences. For it is held, and I almost believe it, that there are not as many sheaves of wheat grown as there are people living on the earth; but God daily blesses and increases the wheat in the sack, the flour in the tray, the bread on the table and in the mouth, as Christ did. John 6:12 f. It is also noticeable that as a rule poor people and their children are fatter and their food reaches farther and agrees with them better than is the case among the rich with all their provisions. However that the godless at times suffer need, or in times of famine many die of hunger, is caused by a special plague as pestilence, war etc. In other ways we see that in all things it is not the food, but the Word of God that nourishes every human being.

15. Now that God sustains all mankind by bread, and not by the Word alone, without bread, is done to the end, that he conceals his work in the world in order to exercise believers; just as he commanded the children of Israel to arm themselves and to fight, and yet it was not his pleasure that victory should come through their own sword and deeds; but he himself was to slay their enemies and triumph with their swords and through their deeds. Here it might a1so be said: The warrior was not victorious through his sword alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God, as David sings, Psalm 44:6: “For I will not trust in my bow, neither shall my sword save me.” Also <19E710> Psalm 147:10 and Psalm 33:16-17: “He taketh no pleasure in the legs of a man. A mighty man is not delivered by great strength. A horse is a vain thing for safety.” Yet he uses man and the horse, the sword and bow: but not because of the strength and power of man and of the horse, but under the veil and covering of man and the horse he fights and does all. This he proves in that he often did and daily does the same without man and the horse, where there is need and he is not tempted.

16. Thus he does also with the bread; since it is at hand, he nourishes us through it and by means of it, so that we do not see it and we think the bread does it; but where it is not at hand, there he nourishes us without the bread, only through the Word, as he does by means of the bread; so that thus bread is God’s helper, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 3:9: “We are God’s fellow workers,” that is, through and under our outward ministerial office he gives inwardly his grace, which he also could give and does give indeed without our office; but since the office is at hand, one should not despise it nor tempt God. Thus God sustains us outwardly by bread; but only inwardly he gives that growth and permanency, which the bread cannot give. And the summary is: All creatures are God’s larva and mummery, which he permits to work with him and to help to do everything that he can do and does do otherwise without their cooperation, in order that we may cleave alone to his Word. Thus, if bread is at hand, that we do not therefore trust the more; or if there is no bread present, that we do not therefore despair the more; but use it when it is at hand, and do without it, when there is none; being assured that we shall still live and be sustained at both times by God’s Word, whether there be bread or no bread. With such faith one overcomes avarice and temporal care for daily bread in the right way.

17. Christ’s second temptation is opposed to the first and is repugnant to common sense. Its substance is that the devil teaches us to tempt God; as he here calls to Christ to cast himself down from the pinnacle of the temple, which was not at all necessary, since there were surely good steps upon which he could descend. And that this temptation was for the purpose of tempting or making trial of God, the answer of Christ also clearly proves, when he says: “Thou shalt not make trial of the Lord thy God.” By this he shows that the devil wished to lead him into temptation.

18. And this very appropriately follows the first temptation. For where the devil feels a heart trusts God in times of want and need, he soon ceases his temptation of bread and avarice and thinks: Wait, wilt thou be very spiritual and believing, I will assist you: He approaches and attacks on the other side, that we might believe where God has not commanded us to believe, nor wills that we should believe. For example, if God gave you bread in your homes, as he does yearly everywhere in the world, and you would not use it, but instead you would cause need and want yourselves, and say: Why, we are to believe God; I will not eat the bread, but will patiently wait until God sends me manna from heaven. See, that would be tempting God; for that is not believing where all is at hand that we need and should have. How can one believe that he will receive what he already has ?

19. Thus you see here that Satan held before Christ want and need where there was neither want nor need; but where there was already good means by which to descend from the temple without such a newly devised and unnecessary way of descending. For this purpose Satan led Christ to the top of the temple, in the holy city, says the Evangelist, and placed him in a holy place. For he creates such precious thoughts in man that he thinks he is filled with faith and is on the true way of holiness; and yet he does not stand in the temple, but is only on the outside of the temple, that is, he is not in the true holy mind or life of faith; and yet he is in the holy city; that is, such persons are found only in Christendom and among true Christians, who hear a great deal of preaching about faith. To these persons he applies the sayings of Scripture. For such persons learn Scripture also by daily hearing it; but not farther than they can apply it to their erroneous opinions and their false faith. For Satan here quotes from the Psalter, Psalm 91:11-12, that God commanded the angels that they should protect the children of God and carry them on their hands. But Satan like a rogue and cheat fails to quote what follows, namely, that the angels shall protect the children of God in all their ways. For the Psalm reads thus: “For he will give his angels charge over thee to keep thee in all thy ways. They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone;” hence the protection of the angels does not reach farther, according to the command of God, than the ways in which God has commanded us to walk.

When we walk in these ways of God, his angels take care of us. But the devil omits to quote “the ways of God” and interprets and applies the protection of the angels to all things, also to that which God has not commanded; then it fails and we tempt God.

20. Now, this temptation seldom takes place in outward material things as bread, clothing, house, etc. For we find many foolhardy people, who risk and endanger their body and life, their property and honor, with out any need of doing so; as those do who willfully enter into battle or jump into the water, or gamble for money, or in other ways venture into danger, of whom the wise man says in Sirach 3:27: “Whoever takes pleasure in danger, will thereby be overcome;” for in the degree one struggles to get a thing, will he succeed in obtaining it; and good swimmers are likely to drown and good climbers likely to fall. Yet it is seldom that those of false faith in God abstain from bread, clothing and other necessities of life, when they are at hand. As we read of two hermits, who would not accept bread from the people, but thought God should send it to them directly from heaven; so the consequence was that one died and went to his father, the devil, who taught him such faith and left him fall from the pinnacle.

21. But in spiritual matters this temptation is powerful when one has to do with the nourishment not of the body but of the soul. Here God has held before us the person and way, by which the soul can be forever nourished in the richest manner possible without any want, namely Christ, our Savior.

But this way, this treasure, this provision no one desires. Everybody seeks another way, other provisions to help their souls. The real guilty ones are those who would be saved through their own work; these the devil sets conspicuously on the top of the temple. They follow him and go down where there is no stairway; they believe and trust in their own work where there is no faith nor trust, no way nor bridge, and break their necks. But Satan makes use of and persuades them through the Scriptures to believe that the angels will protect them, and that their way, works and faith are pleasing to God, and who called them through the Scriptures to do good works; but they do not care how falsely they explain the Scriptures.

22. Who these are, we have identified often enough and very fully, namely, workrighteous persons and unbelieving hypocrites under the name of being Christians and among the congregation of Christian people. For the temptation must take place in the holy city and one temptation is seldom against another. In the first temptation want and hunger are the reasons that we should not believe; and by which we become anxious to have a full sufficiency, so that there is no chance for us to believe. In the second temptation, however, the abundance and the full sufficiency are the reasons that we do not believe, by which we become tired of the common treasure, and every one tries to do something through his own powers to provide for his soul. So we do; if we have nothing, then we doubt God and believe not; if we have abundance, then we become tired of it and wish to have something different, and again we fail to believe. There we flee and turn against want and seek abundance: here we seek want and flee from the abundance we have. No, whatever God does for us, is never right. Such is the bottomless wickedness of our unbelief.

23. Christ’s third temptation consists in temporal honor and power; as the words of the devil clearly teach, when Satan shows and offers Christ all the kingdoms of the world if he would worship him. To this class those belong who fall from their faith for the sake of honor and power, that they may enjoy good days, or not believe further than their honor and power extend.

Such are also the heretics who start sects and factions in matters of faith among Christians, that they may make a great parade before the world and soar aloft in their own honor. Hence one may place this third temptation on the right, and the first on the left side. The first is the temptation of misfortune, by which man is stirred to anger, impatience and unbelief; the third and last, the temptation of prosperity, by which man is enticed to lust, honor, joy, and whatever is high. The second or middle temptation is spiritual and deals with the blind tricks and errors that mislead reason from faith.

24. For whom the devil cannot overcome with poverty, want, need and misery, he attacks with riches, favor, honor, pleasure, power and the like, and contends on both sides against us; yea, “he walketh about,” says St.

Peter in 1 Peter 5:8, so that if he cannot overthrow us either with suffering or love, that is, with the first temptation on the left or the third on the right, he retires to a higher and different method and attacks us with error, blindness and a false understanding of the Scripture. If he wins there, we fare ill on all sides and in all things; and whether one suffers poverty or has abundance, whether he fights or surrenders, all is lost. For when one is in error, neither patience in misfortune nor firmness in prosperity helps him; seeing that in both heretics are often powerful and the devil deliberately acts as if he were overcome in the first and last temptations, although he is not, if he has only won in the middle or second temptation. For he lets his own children suffer much and be patient, even at times to spurn the world; but never with a true and honest heart.

25. Now these three temptations taken together are heavy and hard; but the middle one is the greatest; for it attacks the doctrine of faith itself in the soul, and is spiritual and in spiritual matters. The other two attack faith in outward things, in fortune and misfortune, in pleasure and pain etc., although both severely try us. For it is sad that one should lay hold of heaven and ever be in want and eat stones where there is no bread. Again, it is sad to despise favors, honor and possessions, friends and associates, and let go what one already has. But faith, rooted in God’s Word, is able to do all things; is faith strong, then it is also easy for the believer to do this.

26. The order of these temptations, as they met Christ, one cannot absolutely determine; for the Evangelists give them in different order. The temptation Matthew places as the middle one, Luke places last, Luke 4, 4f.; and again, the temptation Luke places in the middle, Matthew places last, as if little depended on the order. But if one wished to preach or speak of them, the order of Luke would be the better. For it is a fine opportunity to repeat and relate that the devil began with want and misfortune; when that did not work, then he began with prosperity and honor; and last, when all fails, that he wantonly and wickedly springs forth and strikes people with terror, lies and other spiritual tricks. And since they have no order in practice and experience, but as it happens that a Christian may be attacked at one time with the last, and another time with the first etc., Matthew gave little attention to the order for a preacher to observe in speaking of this theme. And perhaps it was also the same with Christ through the forty days that the devil held to no order, but today attacked him with this and tomorrow with another temptation, and again in ten days with the first and so on, just as occasion was given.

27. At last angels approached and served him. This must have taken place in a literal sense, that they appeared in a bodily form and gave him to eat and drink, and just as at a table, they ministered to all his wants. For the service is offered outwardly to his body, just like, no doubt, the devil, his tempter, also appeared in a bodily form, perhaps like an angel. For, seeing that he places him on the pinnacle of the temple and shows him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment, he must have been a higher being than a man, since he represents himself as a higher being, in that he offers him all the kingdoms of the world and permits himself to be worshiped. But he surely did not bear the form of the devil, for he desires to be beautiful when he lies and deceives, as St. Paul says of him in 2 Corinthians 11:14: “For even Satan fashioneth himself into an angel of light.”

28. This however is written for our comfort, that we may know that many angels minister also to us, where one devil attacks us; if we fight with a knightly spirit and firmly stand, God will not let us suffer want, the angels of heaven would sooner appear and be our bakers, waiters and cooks and minister to all our wants. This is not written for Christ’s sake for he does not need it. Did the angels serve him, then they may also serve us.

Invocavit: The First Sunday in Lent, 2018

$
0
0

Invocavit Sunday, The First Sunday in Lent, 2018

Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn #148           Lord Jesus Christ                
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #146      Lamb of God                        


The Human Nature of Christ - And Faith

The Hymn #153             Stricken Smitten  
                 
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #154 Alas and Did My Savior              

KJV 2 Corinthians 6:1 We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God in vain. 2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.) 3 Giving no offence in any thing, that the ministry be not blamed: 4 But in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of God, in much patience, in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, 5 In stripes, in imprisonments, in tumults, in labours, in watchings, in fastings; 6 By pureness, by knowledge, by longsuffering, by kindness, by the Holy Ghost, by love unfeigned, 7 By the word of truth, by the power of God, by the armour of righteousness on the right hand and on the left, 8 By honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report: as deceivers, and yet true; 9 As unknown, and yet well known; as dying, and, behold, we live; as chastened, and not killed; 10 As sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing all things.

KJV Matthew 4:1 Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. 2 And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred. 3 And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread. 4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. 5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, 6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. 7 Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. 8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. 10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. 11 Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

First Sunday In Lent

Lord God, heavenly Father, inasmuch as the adversary doth continually afflict us, and as a roaring lion doth walk about, seeking to devour us: We beseech Thee for the sake of the suffering and death of Thy Son, Jesus Christ, to help us by the grace of the Holy Spirit, and to strengthen our hearts by Thy word, that our enemy may not prevail over us, but that we may evermore abide in Thy grace, and be preserved unto everlasting life; through the same, Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.

The Human Nature of Christ - And Faith

KJV Matthew 4:1 Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. 

Lent begins with the temptation of Christ, which by itself should remind us of the human nature of Jesus. The Incarnation is the greatest miracle of all, and one which I think surpasses the Creation of the universe in six 24-hour days. The reason? Mankind has imagined all kinds of Creations, many of them absurd - like the ultra-slow evolution kind. But no one could possibly conjure up anything as wonderful as God becoming man, born of the Virgin, growing up and taking on a public ministry.

Every action and Word of Jesus is God speaking through the Son. As Luther wrote, we should always thank God the Father for showing us His graciousness in His Son. That itself shows the gracious, loving, forgiving nature of God the Father. Besides, it reminds us of the unified voice of the Father and Son, witnessed by the Holy Spirit.

Luther described two kinds of temptations. One is when we test ourselves to subject ourselves to God's Word.  the other is that which God allows to fall upon us, testing our faith. 

The first is often mocked because people turn self-denial into a good work to please God and to impress others. That is addressed in the text for Ash Wednesday. My earliest memory of Lent is hearing people say, "I am giving up desserts for Lent." And others would chime in with the mini-trials of the same type. 

Parents subordinate themselves to their children when they lovingly take care of a sick or weak child, or when they show great patience in the trials of youth, which are many and varied. 

God places trials, afflictions, and temptations in our way to test our faith. This faith in Christ is something which God creates through the Gospel, so we are new creations (creatures) in Him. That which He fashions he also makes stronger.

An athlete will go to the gym to see if a new exercise makes a set of muscles ache with pain the next few days. Why do that? Athletes know that the exercise tears down muscle fiber which is that much stronger afterwards.

People take that for granted when they see someone struggling with weights, hanging from pull-up bars, or stretching. If we understand that so well, then the same experience from God should help us see how we are strengthened. 

In this sermon Luther calls us larvae and mummers. Larva become what they must, completely transformed by what is placed there in that tiny egg. Mummers are costumed players on a stage. Whatever they do is written in the script. 

2 And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an hungred. 3 And when the tempter came to him, he said, If thou be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread.

When we are surrounded by plenty, it does not demand that we exercise this faith God has given us. The danger is always that we take God's bounty for granted. But when we are surrounded by desert stones instead of prosperity, then faith is definitely put on trial.

Jesus did not say, "I will prove a point and go into the desert." Instead the Spirit led Him there. It was God's will that He live there and be tempted by Satan with all that was lacking. So Jesus is both Teacher and Example.

How it is that the Savior understands our experiences of being abandoned, hated, ignored, shunned? He faced them too, though He did nothing deserving such treatment. 

Greed is the enemy of faith. Thankfulness can be overflowing for ordinary blessings, but greed is never satisfied. Greed only fuels the need for more money, more power, more honors. 

That does not mean that people experiencing want are greedy. That is a test of faith, to say, "I trust God will provide." And the experience of want make us more thankful.

Phoenix had so little rain that the annual rainfall was only 1/2 inch one year. Five inches was the average and we hardly ever saw that. Now the rainfall is especially welcome, although I do say at times, "What am I going to do with this?"

I can tick off a lot of boxes of what looked good to me in the past. That is where the mummers comment makes sense. All of them would have made my present activities impossible. Imagine trying to teach NT Greek for free at a seminary where they charge $3,000 cash in advance to take the course, which is required! "May I teach this free on the Net?" No! I said to a college, I could show them how to learn Greek fast. "No!" I don't think I finished the sentence because the professor already had that job. "I could teach on..." No! I have about 20 other examples. 

4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

Faith means the very nature of the privation is understood as God's will and will bring a blessing in time. Two actions help. One is to find answers in the Scriptures. The other is to pray for help in time of need and trust in the answer. "Cast your cares upon Him for He cares for you."

Long-term experience shows that peace and happiness do not come from material blessings and the honors bestowed by man, but from believing and thankful hearts. 

8. Secondly, the tempter came forward and attacked Christ with these very same cares of food for the body and with the unbelief in the goodness of God, and said: “If thou art the Son of God, command that these stones become bread,” as if he should say: Yes, trust thou in God and bake and cook nothing; only wait patiently until a roasted fowl flies into your mouth; do you now say that you have a God who cares for you; where is now your heavenly Father, who has charge of you? Yea, it seems to me he lets you in a fine condition; eat now and drink from your faith, let us see how you will satisfy your hunger; yea, when you have stones for bread. What a fine Son of God you are! How fatherly he is disposed toward you in that he fails to send you a slice of bread and permits you to be so poor and needy; do you now continue to believe that you are his son and he is your father? With like thoughts he truly attacks all the children of God. And Christ surely felt this temptation, for he was no stock nor stone; although he was and remained pure and without sin, as we cannot do.

We are fed primarily by the Word of God, because everything we have and enjoy, even those things we may despise (moles) or ignore (beneficial insects) are part of God's care for us.

5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple, 6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.

This is the most common temptation expressed today. And many do not fall into it - they jump into it. They demand that God prove who He is by giving them exactly what they demand. In fact, as Cho wrote (and people gushed over it) - God cannot give until He knows exactly what we need.

So we hear, "I prayed for my disability to go away, but it did not. So where is God?" Paul addressed this, and Jesus experienced it.

7 Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.

God does not worry about losing a believer because He is God. But this gets transformed into congregational and pastoral action, where certain people cannot be offended. A council president told me that I should not have preached about infant faith when Babtists were visiting. He really scolded me about that. So he missed his opportunity to tell the complainers about the Word of God. "You must believe as children." and "Let the children come to Me. Do not forbid them." And instead scolded me and increasingly hardened his own heart and blinded himself spiritually. 

This "musn't lose someone" mentality means that those preaching and teaching the Word become pleasant Methodists, who blend in with every opinion, every doctrine. People communicated with me, "I have people being told that Methodists believe in the Real Presence. Help me out." So I looked up the official position, which stated they believed in the spiritual presence of Christ. That reminded me of future ELCA leaders mocking the Real Presence and actively pursuing Holy Communion with the Calvinist faculty at a nearby seminary (Wartburg and another seminary). 

So one moves from indifference and blending into outright hostility toward the clear teaching of the Word.

How is this a temptation? There are no fast women and horses involved. The temptation is to please everyone by blunting the Word and making sure no one even knows about the painful nature of bearing the cross, suffering because of the Word. 

8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; 9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.

All  spiritual falsehood comes from Satan, in fact all lies - and murder as well. The process in manufacturing or following falsehood is simple - separate the Spirit from the Word.

"I feel this is true."

"God told me in a dream last night..."

"The pope has declared this from the throne of his heart."

10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. 11 Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

There is big money in denying the Word of God. Probably 99.9% of all the clergy and church teachers will never get the publicity and pleasant treatment of Rob Bell, who went to Fuller Seminary, became a Fulleroid, and started a congregation with thousands of members - as an Evangelical pastor. Later he denied all the doctrines of Christianity and now warns people against them. 

Rob teaches what his Father Below feeds him.

Rob Bell is one of the most influential thinkers in America, Time magazine tells us. It must be true.

 Here is a DMin from Fuller Seminary who has plagued his sect for years, enjoying a cushy job and wearing unearned doctoral stripes, which are probably on his pajamas and yoga pants as well.

One is sorely tempted to say, "If someone teaches the Words of Christ, everyone will be grateful and multitudes will sign up." That temptation has ruined what was left of Protestantism in America. 

Multitudes followed Jesus while everything looked good. Multitudes deserted Him during the Passion. Jesus said, "Serve only God," not "God wants His Church to grow." There is a vast void between Jesus and McGavran, but people are content to zing others with the crafts and assaults of McGavran.


From Alec Satin - Comfort for Christians: Gerhardt Is a Faithful Lutheran - And the Most Comforting Writer

$
0
0


More hymns here.

Lyrics - “A Lamb Goes Uncomplaining Forth” by Paul Gerhardt

1. A Lamb goes uncomplaining forth,
The guilt of all men bearing;
And laden with the sins of earth,
None else the burden sharing!
Goes patient on, grow weak and faint,
To slaughter led without complaint,
That spotless life to offer;
Bears shame and stripes, and wounds and death,
Anguish and mockery, and saith,
“Willing all this I suffer.”
2. This Lamb is Christ, the soul’s great Friend,
The Lamb of God, our Savior;
Him God the Father chose to send
To gain for us His favor.
“Go forth, My Son,” the Father saith,
“And free men from the fear of death,
From guilt and condemnation.
The wrath and stripes are hard to bear,
But by Thy Passion men shall share
The fruit of Thy salvation.”
3. “Yea, Father, yea, most willingly
I’ll bear what Thou commandest;
My will conforms to Thy decree,
I do what Thou demandest.”
O wondrous Love, what hast Thou done!
The Father offers up His Son!
The Son, content, descendeth!
O Love, how strong Thou art to save!
Thou beddest Him within the grave
Whose word the mountains rendeth.
4. From morn till eve my theme shall be
Thy mercy’s wondrous measure;
To sacrifice myself for Thee
Shall be my aim and pleasure.
My stream of life shall ever be
A current flowing ceaselessly,
Thy constant praise outpouring.
I’ll treasure in my memory,
O Lord, all Thou hast done for me,
Thy gracious love adoring.
5. Of death I am no more afraid,
New life from Thee is flowing;
Thy cross affords me cooling shade
When noonday’s sun is glowing.
When by my grief I am opprest,
On Thee my weary soul shall rest
Serenely as on pillows.
Thou art my Anchor when by woe
My bark is driven to and fro
On trouble’s surging billows.
6. And when Thy glory I shall see
And taste Thy kingdom’s pleasure,
Thy blood my royal robe shall be,
My joy beyond all measure.
When I appear before Thy throne,
Thy righteousness shall be my crown,-
With these I need not hide me.
And there, in garments richly wrought
As Thine own bride, I shall be brought
To stand in joy beside Thee.
The Lutheran Hymnal
Hymn #142
Text: Is. 53: 7
Author: Paul Gerhardt, 1648, cento
Translated by: composite
Titled: Ein Laemmlein geht
Tune: An Wasserfluessen Babylon
1st Published in: “Deutsch Kirchenamt”
Town: Strassburg, 1525

More about the Author, Paul Gerhardt 

Paul Gerhardt’s faith and character can be seen in an excerpt from the “testament” he prepared for his son:
“Now that I have reached the 70th year of my life and also have the joyful hope that my dear, holy God will soon rescue me out of this world and lead me into a better life than I have had until now on earth, I thank Him especially for all His kindness and faithfulness which, from my mother’s womb until the present hour, He has shown me in body and soul and in all that He has given me. Besides this, I ask Him from the bottom of my heart that when my hour comes He would grant me a happy departure, take my soul into His fatherly hands, and give my body a peaceful rest in the ground until the dear Last Day, when I, with all of my [family] who have been before me and also may remain after me, will reawake and behold my dear Lord Jesus Christ face to face, in whom I have believed but have not yet seen. To my only son whom I am leaving behind I leave few earthly goods, but with them I leave him an honorable name of which he will not have to be ashamed. read the rest…

  1. Wolfmueller. Retrieved 2018-02-18 from www.hope-aurora.org/hymns/ALambGoesUncomplainingIandII.pdf ↩︎


Targeted Reviews of Books on Amazon - Sell Books, Score Points

$
0
0
Not Jar-Jar,
Jars of Clay.

Customer Review


on February 18, 2018
This is a valuable book, even though it is mostly hagiography and PR for WELS. Treating the history of the school via its presidents is handy, and there are many worthwhile details about who married whom - to help outsiders figure out some of the bloodlines of WELS. I also like the revealing of false doctrine in WELS, such as "the precious doctrine of objective justification." One might hope that the author, who calls himself Lutheran, might be able to say the words "Justification by Faith" during his career. Did WELS adopt Church Growth by sending so many through Fuller Seminary? That should be a theme of an honest history of WELS, but that seems to be hidden away in the secrets closet. Another significant theme would be the abusive GA/HB hazing ritual inflicted on new students. Dean Brenner said, "The good outweighs the bad." I would love to see that stated under oath in court some day. Judgment Day for WELS is coming, as Brenner's father used to say.
review image

Hugh Jackman Came to the Walmart Saturday Morning Meeting for Little Ichabod's Birthday

$
0
0


We were very impressed with Hugh Jackman at the Christmas Walmart meeting, a year or so ago. He accepted a card from a little girl, during his talk, and came out into the audience after the meeting - unheard of! - to meet the little girl and say hello to her mother. Jackman then stayed around to shake hands, and Team Jackson headed over to him to say hello.

No other celebrity has stayed around to sign more than an autograph or two. Usually they are spirited out, like Paul being let down in a basket at night (Acts 9:25).

This time a little boy dressed as P. T. Barnum, so the CEO and Hugh waved the boy down for photos. More kids arrived for photos. Jackman posed with all of them.

When Jackman was at the Christmas meeting, he sang full-force from Le Miz and belted out the Christmas hymns with the WM choir.

At a junior talent show in Australia,
Hugh Jackman played the role of Wolverine. A prodigy!

 Formal Greek lessons started later, after Marty translated all of John's Gospel from Latin. Later, we did the same in Greek.

Krauth on Doctrine - So Why Are the UOJists Indifferent, Gladly Working with and Worshiping with Any Creed but Luther's?

$
0
0


From Chap 13 of the Krauth biography by Spaeth. Emphasis added
Do you believe the fundamental doctrines of God’s Word to be taught in a manner substantially correct in the doctrinal articles of the Augsburg Confession? Do you believe that the Augsburg Confession and the Catechisms of Luther are a summary and just exhibition of the fundamental principles of God’s Word? This is as mild a test as could well be presented of a man’s Lutheranism. Will yours bear it? Do you believe that the fundamental doctrines of God’s Word are taught in the Confessions, or have you doctrines which you are disposed to make fundamental, about which they are silent? If you have, you are not a Lutheran on our General Synod’s definition. Do you believe that those fundamental doctrines are taught in a manner substantially correct, or do you think the manner is incorrect, even in substantial, poor, confused, capable of twenty different meanings, each one of which has as good a claim as any other to recognition, and that there are arts and mysteries of interpretation by which our Confessions are Romish and Protestant. Orthodox and Socinian, Pauline and Pelagian, Zwinglian and Lutheran? If the latter is your view, you are not a Lutheran as our General Synod defines the term. When it makes our Confessions a test of doctrine, it implies that their meaning is ascertainable, and that they have but one meaning. Are you hugging yourself in the delusion that you are a Lutheran, because you can receive, on what you acknowledge to be fundamental, the words of the Confessions in some sense, though it is demonstrable, and you know it, that this sense is not theirs, but yours?

Earthworms are more important than pandas (if you want to save the planet)

$
0
0


Earthworms are more important than pandas (if you want to save the planet):

"It may be doubted whether there are many other animals which have played so important a part in the history of the world, as have these lowly organised creatures.

– Charles Darwin, The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms (1881)

Not all wildlife is created equal in our eyes. Take the earthworm, which doesn’t have the widespread appeal of larger, more charismatic animals such as gorillas, tigers or pandas. Worms are never going to get a strong “cute response”, and they won’t ever be the face of a conservation campaign.

But what Darwin rightly recognised is that – panda fans avert your eyes – worm conservation is much more important once we factor in their provision of what we now call “ecosystem services”, which are crucial to human survival. Darwin spent 39 years studying these animals for a good reason. In fact, earthworms have even been ranked the number one most influential species in the history of the planet – above dinosaurs and humans."



'via Blog this'

Various People Are Happy with the Facebook UOJ Debate Being Preserved on Ichabod

$
0
0


People wrote to say they enjoyed the Facebook debate about UOJ, especially since the Stormtroopers sounded so addled, repetitive, and confused.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/252399584853848/

Jay Webber and Rolf the Rationalist Preus are like the tape machines in federal museums. Press the button and the message repeats itself. They have been doing this, without any improvement, for decades.

There is a chance to hear the same people enthuse on LutherQuest (sic).



One student of the Bible observed that the UOJ team never worked from Scripture and never showed any Biblical knowledge. The UOJists repeated their Walther-style thetical statements, which were supposed to leave everyone in awe, standing on their own authority. You know - like the Pope's.

In contrast, the Justification by Faith writers leveled short, significant volleys at the Stormtroopers, whose only message is "God declared everyone in the world forgiven."


Why are they called Stormtroopers on Ichabod?
The UOJ Stormtroopers are always firing at targets and missing.

As someone observed, the entire UOJ fantasy was hidden from most people by cleverly hiding the real message of Universalism. The UOJ Stormtroopers are not real Universalists - they are too cowardly for that. They are Universalistic parasites burrowing into the body and drawing warmth and Benjies from the faithful, who would respond as follows if they knew the truth about them. The laity would:

  1. Deprive them of food.
  2. Drive them from town.
  3. Bait them with dogs.
  4. Pelt them with manure. Luther, Large Catechism, Introduction.
 And yet, Buchholz said to me that WELS does not teach that everyone is already saved. He must have forgotten his paper, which Jay Webber considers a work of great genius.

I heard a rumor that he was UOJ, but I no longer hear that.
To find UOJ in the past, start with the heretic Huber or the
rationalistic Halle Pietists.

Another Reader Writes about UOJ versus Justification by Faith.

$
0
0
 Jay Webber says JonBoy Buchholz give JP Meyer a bruising - or was it a big hickey?


From a Reader
Hello Pastor Jackson:

Thank you for your work to uphold the doctrine of Justification by Faith at this time when some Lutheran theologians teach universal justification.

I read your posts about the debate on Facebook between Lutheran laymen and UOJ theologians.

I'm surprised that such a debate took place because I've found that theologians who believe UOJ are careful to keep it sotto voce when interacting with laity because UOJ contradicts what laity know to be fundamental Lutheran doctrine.

To illustrate UOJ teachings, you've published the following quotes from J.P. Meyer:
I. "Objectively speaking, without any reference to an individual sinner's attitude toward Christ's sacrifice, purely on the basis of God's verdict, every sinner, whether he knows about it or not, whether he believes it or not, has received the status of a saint. What will be his reaction when he is informed about this turn of events? Will he accept, or will he decline?"240
J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 103f. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21.

II. "Before Christ's intervention took place God regarded him as a guilt-laden, condemned culprit. After Christ's intervention and through Christ's intervention He regards him as a guilt-free saint."
J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 107. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21.

III. "This applies to the whole world, to every individual sinner, whether he was living in the days of Christ, or had died centuries before His coming, or had not yet been born, perhaps has not been born to this day. It applies to the world as such, regardless of whether a particular sinner ever comes to faith or not."
J. P. Meyer, Ministers of Christ, A Commentary on the Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Milwaukee: Northwestern Publishing House, 1963, p. 109. 2 Corinthians 5:18-21.

 Every Lutheran layman learns the Small Catechism in his confirmation classes. In the Small Catechism in the explanation of the third article of the Apostle's Creed, Martin Luther explained how a person is justified:

I believe that I cannot by my own reason or strength believe in Jesus Christ my Lord or come to him. But the Holy Spirit has called me by the Gospel, enlightened me with his gifts, sanctified and kept me in the true faith.
On the Last Day he will raise up me and all the dead, and give eternal life to me and all believers.

 Nowhere does Luther say that one needs to do something or make a decision to be saved, rather he says that one's actions play no role in salvation. Salvation is entirely the work of God.

Nowhere does Luther say that everyone is saved, rather he says that only believers (that is, those with faith) are saved.

I recall my confirmation training, with my 1943 CPH edition of Luther's Small Catechism and my King James Bible, in which the pastor taught the doctrine of justification:

Pastor: “How are we justified before God?" 
Class: By faith
Pastor: “Whose faith, our faith?”
Class: No, the faith of Jesus. Galatians 2:16, KJV
Pastor: “After God justifies us by imputing the righteousness of Jesus, how is his action evident in our lives?”
Class: The Holy Ghost works faith in our hearts so that we believe God and lead God-fearing lives. 

 Could you imagine the reaction in a congregation if a pastor were to include UOJ in his Easter sermon? For example:
The thief on the cross who confessed Jesus was saved. But you know what? The thief who mocked Jesus was saved too. And so were the Roman soldiers who beat Jesus, the crowd who told Pilate to crucify Jesus, and Judas Iscariot. In fact, everyone who ever lived is a guilt-free child of God and an heir of Heaven, regardless of whether he ever comes to faith or not. That's right, the whole world is saved whether they know it or not.”


On another subject, you recently published a post that included a photo of you standing underneath a statue of C.F.W. Walther. In light of the things you've written about Walther over the years, don't you think you were tempting fate by standing underneath the statue?

Thanks
Sleepless in Sedona



Fergie's Star Spangled Banner Disaster Began with Ski and Glende

$
0
0
Ski wore the same t-shirt my grandson wanted.
Fergie is famous for trying in vain to turn our National Anthem into a howling torch song.



 It started that early?


 Ski and MariQueen.


 I don't read books and magazines about royalty.


 Twelve years of WELS education.


 Bronzer, Febreze? Funny.


 How to get back on the call list and a divine call
from DP Don Patterson.

WELS MLC Professor Call Terminated, Effective Immediately

$
0
0
DP Patterson, here I come Yee-haw.


CALL TERMINATED

PastorsCurrent callDate effective
Prof David SellnowMartin Luther College
New Ulm MN
2/14/20
No longer in the MLC directory. Page not found.

David Sellnow » Directory – Martin Luther College

https://mlc-wels.edu/directory/name/david-sellnow/
In service to the synod, Sellnow has served as a circuit pastor, district Parish Services committee chairman, and as a member ofWELS Campus Ministry Committee (under the auspices of WELSHome Missions). He presently serves as an advisory member onWELS Commission on Youth and Family Ministry and as...


Viewing all 12047 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>