Quantcast
Channel: Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
Viewing all 11959 articles
Browse latest View live

Reviewing the 8-15-2016 Issue of Christian News Reading CN So You Don't Have To. The Two Groups Are Playing for the Same Team

$
0
0
Jeff Kloha is the provost at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis.
Kloha received a Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, England (2006). He earned a Master of Sacred Theology, Bible/Biblical Studies and Master of Divinity degree from Concordia Seminary (1999, 1992). He completed his bachelor’s degree in English language and literature/letters at Concordia University-Ann Arbor (1988).

He served as associate pastor at Gethsemane Lutheran Church in Lakewood, Ohio (1993-99).


Two pastors play for the same team.

Both groups play for the same team, too -
Universal Objective Justification.


I know Montgomery, Cascione, and Hellwig argue for UOJ and against Justification by Faith, which makes them special in Pastor Herman Otten's eyes. LCMS Pastor Steve Flo - in this issue - is so engorged with UOJ that he thought my literal paraphrase of Romans 4:24-25 was blasphemy and scolded me for it. He NIVed it into "also for those who believe they were already forgiven..." blah blah, to quote Shakespeare/Oxford, Romeo and Juliet.

Bucky Hellwig phoned me and demanded, "Have you read the Theses on Justification?" Apparently, they supersede the Scriptures and the Book of Concord. I said, "Yes," and he slammed the phone down.

Otten should stay on this issue until the end of time, so no one has to discuss the Gospel and Justification by Faith during the 500th Anniversary of the Reformation.

I wrote the complete article on July 28, 2016
and most will not see it in CN until August 8th.
For fast results, read Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
 This is an all-Lutheran sport.
Even those like Herman Otten join the sport.

The Christian News headline means nothing without the graphic above. I had to look up the quotation to see what CN was talking about - see their headline above.

Clint Eastwood demonstrates the WELS-LCMS-ELS stink-eye,
when anyone doubts UOJ.
Otten sells Roman Catholic, Babtist, and ELCA authored books. Will he mention this one when the new edition comes out?



Pageviews today so far
5,644
Pageviews yesterday
1,732
Pageviews last month
89,991
Pageviews all time history
4,754,132
Most Read Articles on Ichabod - Last Seven Days - Each Title Is Embedded

---



Reviewing the 8-15-2016 Issue of Christian News Reading CN So You Don't Have To. The Two Groups Are Playing for the Same Team

$
0
0
Jeff Kloha is the provost at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis.
Kloha received a Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Leeds, West Yorkshire, England (2006). He earned a Master of Sacred Theology, Bible/Biblical Studies and Master of Divinity degree from Concordia Seminary (1999, 1992). He completed his bachelor’s degree in English language and literature/letters at Concordia University-Ann Arbor (1988).

He served as associate pastor at Gethsemane Lutheran Church in Lakewood, Ohio (1993-99).


Two pastors play for the same team.

Both groups play for the same team, too -
Universal Objective Justification.


I know Montgomery, Cascione, and Hellwig argue for UOJ and against Justification by Faith, which makes them special in Pastor Herman Otten's eyes. LCMS Pastor Steve Flo - in this issue - is so engorged with UOJ that he thought my literal paraphrase of Romans 4:24-25 was blasphemy and scolded me for it. He NIVed it into "also for those who believe they were already forgiven..." blah blah, to quote Shakespeare/Oxford, Romeo and Juliet.

Bucky Hellwig phoned me and demanded, "Have you read the Theses on Justification?" Apparently, they supersede the Scriptures and the Book of Concord. I said, "Yes," and he slammed the phone down.

Otten should stay on this issue until the end of time, so no one has to discuss the Gospel and Justification by Faith during the 500th Anniversary of the Reformation.

I wrote the complete article on July 28, 2016
and most will not see it in CN until August 8th.
For fast results, read Ichabod, The Glory Has Departed
 This is an all-Lutheran sport.
Even those like Herman Otten join the sport.

The Christian News headline means nothing without the graphic above. I had to look up the quotation to see what CN was talking about - see their headline above.

Clint Eastwood demonstrates the WELS-LCMS-ELS stink-eye,
when anyone doubts UOJ.
Otten sells Roman Catholic, Babtist, and ELCA authored books. Will he mention this one when the new edition comes out?



Pageviews today at 7 pm
5,806
Pageviews yesterday
1,732
Pageviews last month
89,991
Pageviews all time history
4,754,132
Most Read Articles on Ichabod - Last Seven Days - Each Title Is Embedded

---


Shade Gardening versus Sunny Gardening. Some Plants Are Created, Engineered, and Managed for Shade.

$
0
0
Palo Verde Trees love the desert,
as long as they can grow by a stream or watering device.

God has created variety in plants, so some can flourish in the desert - like the cacti and many varieties of beautiful plants. Citrus trees love the desert if they get enough water. We had several Lemon Trees and one Tangerine in Phoenix.  Large deciduous trees only survive where the grounds can be flooded by irrigation, but many desert trees are easy to grow and provide shade for birds and people to enjoy - the Mesquite and the Palo Verde tree.

Likewise, there are many plants that demand cold and thrive in the cold, but do poorly in the heat. Peas, spinach, and kale are so cold-loving that they can survive snow. I used to dig green kale out form under the snow in Midland.

After decades of gardening and reading about the subject, the sunny garden is filled easily - at least in my mind - with plants that thrive in sunshine all day:

  • Sunflowers
  • Corn
  • Tomatoes.
Some people consider Wild Strawberries a weed,
because they grow everywhere.
They are attractive, inobtrusive, loved
by insects and birds.

My favorite new ridiculous term is co-evolution, which explains how plants and insects went through the change over millennia so they could work together. The intricate beneficial relationships are explained by the "fact" that they co-evolved so both could do well and depend on each other. That is the equivalence of shooting a missile, without planning, toward an unthinking planet, and the missile passes by - just right - to get great photos. They co-evolved, so no high level math was needed, no Project Management certifications, no engineering, no thought. 

Blue Hawaii Hostas break the pattern
of green or green-yellow Hostas.
A large grouping of Hostas is impressive under a tree,
and their modest flowers attract Hummingbirds.


Be patient. I am getting to the subject - Shade Gardening.

When I was a young and foolish gardener, I wanted lots more sun and far fewer trees. Phoenix gave me what I wanted - and that was a bummer. I planted eight trees to create an oasis on that burning petri dish of pain called the Valley of the Sun.

Now I have a well scalped maple tree in front and frequently pruned trees in the back. I would rather have the rose garden in the front yard enjoy some afternoon shade and not wither in the heat of the August sun after noon. The backyard is not only shaded by four trees, but also by the mature trees of my neighbors behind me to the West. As you might have guessed, the shade we enjoy in the afternoon is welcome, as we "bid adieu to the day and watch the golden sun setting slowly in the West." (Quote from a series of travelogues shown at movie theaters, around the 1950s)

Many plants are created by God to thrive in the shade, and some of them tolerate a few hours of sunlight. The marks appear in gardening books: full sun, partial sun, and shade.

Wild Strawberries were my first surprise. I knew about them from Midland, where they often grew in the lawns, so I associated them with bright sunlight. But they grew across the West side of our home, deep in the shade. The key factor was running soaker-hoses along both sides of the house, to reach the fence gardens on north and south sides of the backyard, conveniently known as the Wright fence and the Gardener fence.

Wild Strawberries were among the first to blossom and fruit in the Spring, so they are valuable for pollinators and for birds. Therefore, the plants appear along the base of trees and anywhere birds perch. They need a little more water to thrive, and so they spread where birds rest and plants are watered.

Everyone loves Hummingbirds, but I am one of those who will not buy a feeder and fill it with syrup of some type, purchased or made in the kitchen. I not not condemning anyone - I just do not want the trouble and complications. I do want the little visitors, which were common in Phoenix and spotted around here. Bee Balms are good sunny plants for them, but so are Hostas.

I checked this with Norma Boeckler, who has gardens straight from a French painting - and then she paints and photographs them. Yes, her Hostas are patrolled by Hummingbirds, which love to sip and eat insects from the narrow flowers. 

Confidential note to gardeners who are married to city slickers. The other spouse is often not a gardener, which may be very good, since gardeners are hard-headed and argumentative. But listen to what the other person likes and provide that in abundance. Then it is a joint-project and not an alienating obsession. Thus eight rose bushes in the front became an entire yard full of roses, loved by everyone. And "I would like some Calladiums" became a shade feature under the maple and Crepe Myrtle that everyone loves.

We are developing a small Hosta garden next to the house, now mostly carpeted with cardboard, currently doing a good job of killing off the grass and weeds. The Hostas donated by Mr. Gardener have grown and bloomed already, encouraged by the soaker hose and partnering with the Wild Strawberries growing around them against the house. We also have some gold Hostas purchased for about $3 total from Direct Gardening. The new Hostas were tiny but immediately began to grow in the shade and almost catch up with the more mature transplants. The Hosta garden came about chiefly because Mrs. Ichabod loves Hosta as much as roses and Calladiums. 

Calladiums need the shade and
show off their colors best there.


Hostas fueled my plan to provide more Hummingbird plants, especially since I saw one Hummer cruising the Bee Balm in the sun (mints love sun). God provides the birds and plants. All we need to do is grow in abundance what the Hummingbirds love.

Almost Eden provides insights about gardening when I take Sassy through the nursery. Today she stared at me until I gave her breakfast at 7 AM, so we left for our walk. She wanted to explore and trot down Joye Street, so that meant passing by the fire station and returning through Almost Eden. We spotted Opie first and then Almost Eden himself, so we talked about Fig Trees and how easy they are to grow. Opie and Sassy decided to track the pitbull that visited the nursery yesterday and left his scent here and there.

One of my interests is building up the Wild Garden, which is heavily shaded. Almost Eden told me that a lot of berries grow wild in the shade, under trees, so they are engineered for shade while remaining productive. They naturalize from birds eating the seeds and planting the seeds under the perches, so they are gardeners who also use organic fertilizer.

I let Triple Crown Blackberries naturalize by the back fence, where they get some water from the aqueduct I established on and around the fence. But they have gone crazy near the house where  I planted them to replace the rampant weed growth. They get plenty of sun and water. Now I have rampant Blackberry growth in the same place where the weeds dominated. As many know, strong weeds are a signal that the same ground will produce food.

Our helper came by today, and we reduced the weeds by quite a bit. Cleanup seems overwhelming but soon a Dogpatch becomes a garden again. He invited me to see a strange, tall flower that bloomed beside his house, a block away. 

There was a perfect Rose of Sharon that grew on its own. Our helper grinned and said, "Pooped by a  bird?" The flower looked so good that I thought about getting some from Almost Eden, because they are also a shade growing flower, a plant loved by Hummingbirds.

Rose of Sharon is used for a few plants.
This one is from the Hibiscus family.

LCMS Winning Poll for the Most Pastor-Friendly, Back in 2007

$
0
0











There is only one day left to vote in the poll on which synod is the most pastor-friendly.

The Missouri Synod is clearly winning. ELCA pastors leave Sodom for the LCMS. ELS pastors leave their tiny kingdom for their big sister, following the example of the sainted Preus brothers (Jack and Robert).

ELCA probably won some votes because they accept men, women, and the undecided. In the language of the Lavender Mafia: LBGTQ. The Q is for Questioning. That category probably fits most of the straight, male clergy. "I really like the design of the new hymnal. Omigosh. Am I gay?"

I cannot fathom why anyone would vote the Little Sect on the Prairie as the most pastor-friendly. Maybe some read the question as the most pasture-friendly.

The CLC (sic) honors Balaam's Ass by
hosting donkey basketball,
where there are more poops than hoops.

Anyone who voted for WELS must have Stockholm Syndrome, which is rife in the Wisconsin Synod. Stockholm Syndrome is that disorder where people are kept captive and abused and yet sympathize with their captors. Mark Twain described it in Tom Sawyer, when the boys planned to kidnap women, who would fall in love with them.

Stockhold Syndrome is obvious when pastors say, "Every time I read Christian News I thank God I'm in the Wisconsin Synod." One WELS pastor sent me a book on abusive churches. I said, "This fits WELS perfectly."

WELS is united doctrinally. The old leadership is trained 100% at Fuller Seminary and Willow Creek Community Church. The same can be said for the LCMS. Kieschnick has a Fuller-trained administration and he is ecumenical to a fault.

Update
The "conservative" Lutheran sects are more involved in Fuller dogma and universalism than ever before, nine years later.


Brett Meyer on Steadfast (sic) Lutherans (hardeeharhar). More Like Harrison's Fog Machine. UOJ as Their Chief Dogma versus Justification by Faith, as Paul, Luther, and BoC Teach

$
0
0

Steadfast Lutherans - Brett Meyer
  1. Brett Meyer
    February 16th, 2014 at 21:38 | #6
    T. R. Halvorson :@Rev. Paul Rydecki #43 
    Rev. Rydecki, I admit not having read the whole thread, so if this was already discussed, please bear with me.
    I am interested in every thing I can find out about the exegesis of 1 John 2:2, “And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.”
    Do you think this text has a bearing on the question being discussed in this thread?
    Romans 3:23-26, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousess for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; to declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.” Scripture clarifies 1 John 2:2 in Romans 3:23-26 by teaching that Christ is man’s propitiation through faith alone. Not before and without faith as the doctrine of Universal Objective Justification falsely claims.
  2. February 16th, 2014 at 22:21 | #7
    @Brett Meyer #6 
    Thanks for your polite and substantive reply.
    While I do understand the principles of Scripture interpreting Scripture, taking the whole counsel, reading passages together, and so on, a problem remains for me in the use made of Romans 3:23-26 to condition1 John 2:2.
    It makes surplusage and superfluity of the words, “not for ours only but also for the whole world.” With the interpretation you are making, what is left of that clause? How is Jesus the propitiation for the sins of believers, and also everyone else in the world, by the interpretation you are making? In other words, can we let the Romans text erase words from the 1 John text?
  3. Thomas
    February 16th, 2014 at 22:23 | #8
    Nobody has denied that salvation comes through faith in Christ alone. Nobody has suggested that a man can be saved outside of faith in Jesus. Nobody is advocating universalism. But the fact remains that Jesus’ death on the cross was the propitiation for the sins of the whole world. Salvation is available for all men who are brought to faith by the Spirit. Again, simply because a person rejects the salvation won for him by the Lord doesn’t mean that it wasn’t won. What’s the angle with you guys anyway?
  4. Thomas
    February 16th, 2014 at 22:35 | #9
    “And yet Objective Justification teaches that God has declared the whole world of sinners to be righteous, not by faith in Christ.”
    This statement is completely false. It seems sometimes like the deniers of UOJ are being intentionally obtuse. There are two parts: 1- Jesus earned salvation for the whole world through His death and resurrection. 2- That salvation is individually applied to the sinner through the means of grace. Those who reject the Gospel die in unbelief and are lost. Nobody, repeat, nobody is claiming that a man is justified without faith in Jesus Christ.
  5. Jais Tinglund
    February 16th, 2014 at 23:18 | #10
    Somehow it seems to me that all sorts of problems are involved in citing a passage of Holy Scripture which clearly states that “all [...] are justified freely by His grace” as irrefutable evidence that all are not justified by His grace …
  6. Elizabeth
    February 17th, 2014 at 05:33 | #11
    But that is not the whole verse, Jais. Surely it should be read in context. No faith, no justification:
    21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for ALL WHO BELIEVE. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by FAITH. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has FAITH in Jesus.
    And Thomas: the Scripture nowhere bifurcates Justification. Neither should you. To do so is to use your ‘reason’ in the same way we often accuse Calvinists of doing. :o
    I understand what UOJers are trying to do with their schema, and I don’t doubt their sincerity in doing it, but the schema is SO clumsy, so easily misunderstood it muddies the clear water of God’s good Scripture.
  7. Pr. Jim Schulz
    February 17th, 2014 at 07:10 | #12
    It has been stated that nobody is claiming that a man is justified without faith or that no one is teaching Objective Justification separate from Subjective Justification.
    Am I missing something here? It seems to me this theologian did, even in the title of his paper:
    “The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship”


  8. Thomas
    February 17th, 2014 at 07:31 | #13
    I’m not “bifucating” (sic) justification. Christ died for the sins of the world. His salvation is individually applied to the sinner through the means of grace. Those who reject that salvation die in their sins and are lost. Nobody is saved except by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. This is basic Lutheran theology. How thus “muddies the waters” I have no idea. My part in this conversation is over. As usual, this debate goes in fruitless circles. Thanks again to Mr. Pierce for making the case so well.
  9. Sven Wagschal
    February 17th, 2014 at 08:10 | #14
    Pr. Jim Schulz :
    It has been stated that nobody is claiming that a man is justified without faith or that no one is teaching Objective Justification separate from Subjective Justification.
    Am I missing something here? It seems to me this theologian did, even in the title of his paper:
    “The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship”
    http://www.wlsessays.net/files/BivensPrimary.pdf
    No, he does not. Please read the paper. The message of justification leads to faith, which receives this justification. But faith is grounded on that which Christ did for me and all men, and it flows from the gospel proclaiming these glorious works of Christ.
    It must be noted at this point that faith has no worth of its own. God is not justifying a sinner because of his faith *as such* but because of his faith *in Jesus*. Faith is the means by which the sinner receives Christ, clings to him, takes hold of him. Faith is not the one work which in stead of the other works (of the law) is able to safe the sinner. Luther points this out again and again, Pieper writes about it, too. Faith is not the sole work the sinner has to do to become saved, faith has no quality of its own.
    This is the great misunderstanding of many pietists and evangelicals. They focus on *faith as such* instead of adjusting their eyes to Jesus—and so they are looking back to themselves instead to Jesus. Luther described sin as “incurvatio in se ipsum” (in English “to be distorted into oneself”, I think, “in sich selbst verkrümmt sein”); faith, on the other hand, shifts the eyes from one self to another one, i. e. Jesus. You can tell that something goes terribly wrong if faith as such becomes the center instead of Jesus.
    To view from another angle: there are the three solas “sola gratia”, “sola fide” and “sola scriptura”, and there is one solus: solus Christus. The three are Ablative in Latin, the latter is Nominative. For what “Christ alone” means is clarified and explained by the three: Only Jesus safes, because God send him to redeem me which I was and am unable to do, only by trusting in him and clinging to him I live and will live in eternity in the presence of God, and only in scripture I can find him and receive him.
  10. Pr. Jim Schulz
    February 17th, 2014 at 08:36 | #15
    Sven, I did read the paper. The author is clear: “If justification is universal, it must also be objective – sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not.” p.2.
    Since “sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not,” the author doesn’t emphasize Word and Sacrament which deliver “forgiveness, life, and salvation” (Small Catechism). Rather, according to the author, the emphasis of Lutheran worship is effective communication: “The task of communicating the gospel message accurately and adequately will remain one of utmost importance” (p.5) because “Our gracious God has justified every individual person…. God’s will and our desire is that each person be brought to understand and embrace this truth” (p.7).
    “Subjective Justification” shows up only in a footnote in this paper (p.2).
    This is an example of what can happen when Objective Justification and Subjective Justification are treated as two separate doctrines rather than two aspects of the one doctrine of justification by faith alone.
  11. Pr. Jim Schulz
    February 17th, 2014 at 08:48 | #16
    This is a proper understanding of the doctrine of justification, or the forgiveness of sins, in Lutheran worship. The author hits the nail on the head when he says, “The crisis over the liturgy is a result of confusion over the forgiveness of sins” (p.1).:
    http://www.ctsfw.edu/document.doc?id=275 (oops, can't find the page now)
  12. Jais H. Tinglund
    February 17th, 2014 at 08:56 | #17
    Elizabeth :
    But that is not the whole verse, Jais.
    I am not aware that anybody has ever claimed it was. But then again, there are a lot of things being said out there, particularly on the internet. So I am unable to claim with absolutely certainly that somebody has not, at some point, made a such claim. I am not exactly sure what it has to do with me, though …
    Elizabeth :
    Surely it should be read in context.
    It should indeed, and preferably also be understood. It should be read in the immediate context, and in the whole-Biblical context; furthermore, – and this would probably seem obvious to many, but obviously is not obvious to everybody – it should be understood by being read withoutignoring the individual statements of which both it and its contexts are made up.
    It is very common in the Lutheran tradition to follow this principle for the interpretation of Scripture; although there are those who, when they disagree with the conclusions it leads to, will dismiss it is a schema that is too complicated, “clumsy” or “muddying the waters”. For some the fact that a couple of letters can be put in the higher case is “SO” much more compelling.
    Many theologians find, though, that the schema – often referred to as “interpreting Scripture with Scripture”, or using other combinations of the same words, in different tenses, with or without caps – is very helpful, as do many theologically minded laypeople.
    Elizabeth :
    No faith, no justification:
    No promise, no faith in the promise.
  13. Sven Wagschal
    February 17th, 2014 at 09:49 | #18
    Pr. Jim Schulz :
    Sven, I did read the paper. The author is clear: “If justification is universal, it must also be objective – sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not.” p.2.
    Since “sinners are forgiven whether they believe it or not,” the author doesn’t emphasize Word and Sacrament which deliver “forgiveness, life, and salvation” (Small Catechism). Rather, according to the author, the emphasis of Lutheran worship is effective communication: “The task of communicating the gospel message accurately and adequately will remain one of utmost importance” (p.5) because “Our gracious God has justified every individual person…. God’s will and our desire is that each person be brought to understand and embrace this truth” (p.7).
    “Subjective Justification” shows up only in a footnote in this paper (p.2).
    This is an example of what can happen when Objective Justification and Subjective Justification are treated as two separate doctrines rather than two aspects of the one doctrine of justification by faith alone.
    No, this is not the entire picture. The author of this paper writes on page 2:
    “The accomplishment of justification in the lives of sinners like us is profound. The declaratory act of God, like the substitutionary life and death of Jesus Christ th at serve as its basis, is not debatable or changeable. It stands firm as the solid hope for otherwise hopeless and helpless mankind. This declaration of forgiveness, that is, the gospel, conveys life to those spiritually dead. The message of justification invites faith, creates faith, and then maintains faith in the message. With faith come spiritual and eternal life, deep joy, and a profound sense of awe toward the forgiving Lord. Divine love gives birth to love, and justified people who are brought to
    embrace the truth now love because he first loved them. Like all of God’s truths, justification accomplishes profound things in people’s hearts and lives!”
    This is subjective justification. It is not not our faith that creates us new, but the faith is a creature of the gospel which makes a new man. Faith is not justifying us because we are believing, but faith justifies us because we are believing in Jesus. It is the life and work of Christ proclaimed to the sinner which is of importance.
    The enemies of the biblical truth of objective justification do not seem to know what faith is, what the ground is on which faith is rested, who Jesus is and what he did.
  14. Pr. Jim Schulz
    February 17th, 2014 at 10:27 | #19
    Sven, the author of “The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship” makes the mistake of speaking of faith as something of man and not of God:
    “Justification is ‘on account of Christ’ and his substitutionary life and death for mankind, not because of our faith or anything else in us.” (p.2)
  15. Sven Wagschal
    February 17th, 2014 at 10:59 | #20
    Pr. Jim Schulz :
    Sven, the author of “The Primary Doctrine in Its Primary Setting: Objective Justification and Lutheran Worship” makes the mistake of speaking of faith as something of man and not of God:
    “Justification is ‘on account of Christ’ and his substitutionary life and death for mankind, not because of our faith or anything else in us.” (p.2)
    Yes, of course. The sentence you quoted is the belief and confession of Luther, all Lutheran fathers, and of the Book of Concord. Whoever does not teach this, is in error.
    But please look carefully at the sentence. Your accusation is not true. Of course the author knows that faith comes from God, is his creature, and as such justifies us, as the quote in my post above clearly shows. (#18: “The message of justification invites faith, creates faith, and then maintains faith in the message. With faith come spiritual and eternal life,…”).
    What the author is speaking against is a faith, seen as something the man does to receive justification, which counts as a work that earns him justification. Of course we believe, teach, and confess that faith is not counted as righteousness because our faith is something we do and earn salvation, but because faith clings to Christ and his gifts.
    Again: You deniers of Objective Justification do not seem to know what faith is and why it justifies.
  16. Sven Wagschal
    February 17th, 2014 at 11:13 | #21
    To phrase it another way: we are not justified because of faith, but by faith. Faith is purely instrumental, as Pieper writes (Christliche Dogmatik, Bd. 2, St. Louis 1917. Abschnitt: Die Aneignung des von Christus erworbenen Heils. Kapitel: Der seligmachende Glaube, 5. Der Glaube ist zur Erlangung der Rechtfertigung und Seligkeit lediglich instrumental, S. 524): Faith, receiving justification and salvation, is purely instrumental.
    This is a key chapter for understanding nature and benefit of the christian faith.
    We are not justified because of our faith but because of Jesus (a statement that shows our faith in Jesus—a faith that justifies us).
  17. Brett Meyer
    February 17th, 2014 at 12:06 | #22
    T. R. Halvorson :@Brett Meyer #6 Thanks for your polite and substantive reply.
    While I do understand the principles of Scripture interpreting Scripture, taking the whole counsel, reading passages together, and so on, a problem remains for me in the use made of Romans 3:23-26 to condition 1 John 2:2.
    It makes surplusage and superfluity of the words, “not for ours only but also for the whole world.” With the interpretation you are making, what is left of that clause? How is Jesus the propitiation for the sins of believers, and also everyone else in the world, by the interpretation you are making? In other words, can we let the Romans text erase words from the 1 John text?
    Pastor Halvorson, 1 John 2:2 is teaching that Christ is set forth as The Propitiator for the whole world, believers and unbelievers, but clarifies inRomans 3:23-26 that only believers obtain Christ as their propitiation against God’s wrath over sin. Unbelievers remain, continue (abideth) under God’s wrath and condemnation – not God’s grace and forgiveness.John 3:36, “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.” I confess that nothing in God’s divine Word is superfluous and neither is it contradictory to any other part of Scripture. The same understanding is taught concerning Christ as Mediator. He is the Mediator for the whole world but only believers obtain Christ as their Mediator against God’s wrath over sin.
    The Christian Book of Concord declares these truths here clearly in the following quote. Note that they faithfully teach that for Christ sake the Father ‘may’ become reconciled but only through faith in those who believe ‘in Christ’ – not that the Father is already reconciled through the work of Christ and neither is faith’s object in a supposed former declaration but solely in Christ. Note also that reconciliation follows faith in Christ and does not proceed faith as UOJ falsely claims.
    “The wrath of God cannot be appeased if we set against it our own works, because Christ has been set forth as a Propitiator, so that for His sake, the Father may become reconciled to us. But Christ is not apprehended as a Mediator except by faith. Therefore, by faith alone we obtain remission of sins, when we comfort our hearts with confidence in themercy promised for 81] Christ’s sake. Likewise Paul, Rom. 5:2, says: By whom also we have access, and adds, by faith. Thus, therefore, we are reconciled to the Father, and receive remission of sins when we are comforted with confidence in the mercy promised for Christ’s sake.The adversaries regard Christ as Mediator and Propitiator for this reason, namely, that He has merited the habit of love; they do not urge us to use Him now as Mediator, but, as though Christ were altogether buried, they imagine that we have access through our own works, and, through these, merit this habit, and afterwards, by this love, come to God. Is not this to bury Christ altogether, and to take away the entire doctrine of faith? Paul on the contrary, teaches that we have access, i.e., reconciliation, through Christ. And to show how this occurs, he adds that we have access by faith. By faith, therefore, for Christ’s sake, we receive remission of sins. We cannot set our own love and our own works over against God’s wrath.

    86] But since we receive remission of sins and the Holy Ghost by faith alone, faith alone justifies, because those reconciled are accounted righteous and children of God, not on account of their own purity, but through mercy for Christ’s sake, provided only they by faith apprehend this mercy. Accordingly, Scripture testifies that by faith we are accounted righteous, Rom. 3:26. We, therefore, will add testimonies which clearly declare that faith is that very righteousness by which we are accounted righteous before God, namely, not because it is a work that is in itself worthy, but because it receives the promise by which God has promised that for Christ’s sake He wishes to be propitious to those believing in Him, or because He knows that Christ of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption, 1 Cor. 1:30.

    113] But faith, properly so called, is that which assents to the promise [is when my heart, and the Holy Ghost in the heart, says: The promise of God is true and certain]. Of 114] this faith Scripture speaks. And because it receives the remission of sins, and reconciles us to God, by this faith we are [like Abraham] accounted righteous for Christ’s sake before we love and do the works of the Law, although love necessarily follows. 115]Nor, indeed, is this faith an idle knowledge, neither can it coexist with mortal sin, but it is a work of the Holy Ghost, whereby we are freed from death, and terrified minds are encouraged and quickened. 116] 
    http://www.bookofconcord.org/defense_4_justification.php
    I hope this helps clarify,
    In Christ,
    Brett Meyer
  18. February 17th, 2014 at 12:29 | #23
    I believe the following from Concordia Journal sums up the issue at hand nicely. Anyone interested in the full article can find it at this link:
    Should, for instance, anyone deny the universality of Christ’s redemption, negating with Calvin the Scripture truth that Christ has redeemed all mankind and that in the Gospel God seriously offers to all men His grace without any discrimination, then he subverts the doctrine of justification. If that error is maintained, then the individual sinner cannot become personally sure of his salvation unless he receives an extraordinary, immediate revelation to that effect. Again, should anyone teach that Christ has indeed redeemed all men, but not completely, in other words, that Christ has indeed made forgiveness of sins possible for all men, but that this forgiveness of sins or justification does not yet actually exist for every sinner, then he makes faith and conversion a meritorious cause of the forgiveness of sins and invalidates the doctrine of justification by grace for Christ’s sake. Or, should anyone pervert the doctrine of the means of grace by denying that God offers the sinner His grace in Word and Sacrament so that the sinner must seek grace in Word and Sacrament, then he bids the sinner seek grace in his own subjective condition, in conversion and regeneration, and so in his own good works. Finally, should anyone pervert the doctrine of faith by denying that faith is essentially trust in the grace offered in the Gospel and by identifying faith with the feeling of grace, then he will put in place of divine grace the condition of the human heart as the basis of justification and salvation. Or should anyone teach wrongly concerning faith by ascribing the creation of faith to human co-operation or to man’s good conduct, then again he surrenders the Scriptural doctrine of justification despite the fact that he may use the expressions “by faith alone” or “by grace for Christ’s sake.” This subject seems to us so very important that we shall develop more fully the three points on the basis of many statements made by Walther. To keep the doctrine of justification pure, we must hold the
    True Biblical Doctrine of the Perfect Redemption of All Men by Christ
    In order to present the perfect redemption of all men by Christ in its full clarity, Walther is concerned to insist that there exists for every person grace, righteousness, and salvation even before faith is engendered, that every sinner is righteous before God, even before he believes, so far as this righteousness has been procured and God has purposed to bestow it (SCR, p.68), that is to say, according to God’s declaration which He pronounced upon all men by raising Christ from the dead (SCR, p. 31). “It is a righteousness not merely made possible [for all men], but one that is already procured or effected” (SCR, p.61). It was of great concern to Walther to repudiate the view that a person by his faith or by his conversion must first render God perfectly favorable or that he must first complete his redemption and righteousness. True, a person, to be saved, must first be converted, but his conversion is not the cause why God saves him, but merely the way by which he comes to that faith which does nothing but accept the perfect redemption which already has been achieved for him. (SCR, p. 34.) The enthusiasts hold the view that Christ has effected what Scripture calls redemption in order that God may now receive sinners into heaven because of their conversion. They do not believe that Christ has accomplished absolutely everything that had to be done in order that God could save us by granting us everlasting life. They imagine that to be saved something still remains for a person to do and that this something is his conversion. Scripture, however, teaches that Christ has done everything. He has already secured for all men reconciliation with God, together with righteousness and all other gifts of salvation. These blessings are already perfectly prepared and are imparted in the holy Christian Church through the Gospel. So there remains nothing that man can do but to accept salvation. It is this truth that we mean to emphasize when we speak of a perfect redemption. It is not true that man already has contributed something and that God adds what is still lacking. Nor is it true that God already has done something and that man completes what is wanting. But the truth is that God alone has already accomplished everything. (SCR, p. 34.)
    This doctrine, as Walther declares again and again, is the one that characterizes the Christian religion and distinguishes it from paganism, so that whoever denies this doctrine denies also the whole Christian religion. Walther writes: “Also the heathen believed that they must secure grace and the forgiveness of their sins, but they have never known that forgiveness of sins has already been procured by another and that it already exists.” In another place he declares:
    “While all religions, except the Christian, teach that man himself must do that by which he is delivered and saved, the Christian religion teaches not merely that all men should be eternally saved but also that they already have been saved. According to the Christian faith, man is already redeemed. He is already delivered and freed from his sin and all its evil consequences. He is already reconciled unto God. The Christian religion proclaims: “You need not redeem yourself nor secure reconciliation between God and yourself, for all this Christ has already accomplished for you. Nor has He left anything for you to do but to believe this, i.e., to accept it!” Here indeed is the point of distinction between Christianity and all other religions. The Jews say: “If you want to be saved, you must keep the Law of Moses.” The Turks say: “If you want to be saved, you must follow the Koran.” The Papists say: “If you want to be saved, you must do good works, repent of your sins, and make satisfaction for them; and if you want to climb especially high, you must enter a monastery.” Similarly, all sects that pervert the Christian religion impose something on man which he must do to make himself righteous and thus save himself. The Lutheran Church, on the other hand, tells man: “Everything is already accomplished. You have been redeemed. You have been justified before God. You are already saved. You need not do a thing to redeem yourself, to reconcile God, and to earn salvation. All you are asked to do is to believe that Christ, the Son of God, has already done all this for you. Believe this, and you actually are in possession of salvation. You will surely be saved.” (RWD, 1874, p. 43.)
    As Walther shows, the very concept of faith demands that we regard grace, redemption, righteousness, and salvation as already existing. He who denies this fact must also deny that man is justified and saved by faith. Walther says that if we are to be saved by believing that we are redeemed, reconciled to God, and in possession of pardon, then all these gifts must exist already before we believe. Now, as surely as the Word of God tells us that we are to be justified by faith, be reconciled to God and saved, so surely all these blessings must exist before we believe; they are only waiting for us to be accepted. The fact that a person is saved by faith alone is possible only for the reason that everything that is necessary to salvation has already been accomplished and exists so that all we need to do is take it. This taking Scripture calls believing. Since God receives into heaven all who believe, righteousness and reconciliation must already have been procured and made ready. All those who do not teach that reconciliation and righteousness exist already prior to faith do not regard faith as the mere hand which receives what has been procured by Christ. They rather regard it as a work by which man co-operates toward his redemption and justification as a condition which he must fulfill and because of which God receives him into heaven. (SCR, p.35.)
  19. Sven Wagschal
    February 17th, 2014 at 13:38 | #24
    @Brett Meyer #22 
    Brett Meyer, you accuse the confessors of objective justification of something which they do not teach. (Again it seems that it is not understood what actually is teached by objective justification.) Please try to understand what we are teaching about faith and the work of Christ.
    But let’s have a look at the quote from the Apology. The “the father may become reconciled to us”-part does not mean that he isn’t reconciled yet! This would be against the clear words of scripture because “Christ reconciled the world with god” (2 Kor 5,19) and “While we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his son” (Rom 5,10). The text is in opposition to the teaching that we are reconciled by our works. It says that God’s wrath is not ended by anything what we do or could do, but by all Christ has done. All of that is received by faith so that the believer has a gracious god (and all unbelievers have no gracious God). We have a reconciled God by Christ, not by our works. To phrase the “may become reconciled”-part as something not yet accomplished or something that has to be made real in our times or the future shows a serious flaw in understanding of the language. The German part of the Apogoly paraphrases the Latin text: “Gottes Zorn kann nicht versühnet noch gestillt werden durch unser Werke, sondern allein Christus ist der Mittler und Versühner, und um seinetwillen allein wird uns der Vater gnädig.” (God’s wrath cannot be reconciled nor be stilled by our works, but alone Christ is our mediator and reconciler, and for his sake the father becomes gracious (merciful?).”
    The text above from Jim Pierce is correct and the proper understanding of the Lutheran Article of Justification.
    Seriously, those who clamor against objective justification do really not know what faith is, who Christ is and what he has done.
  20. Joel Dusek
    February 17th, 2014 at 18:58 | #25
    Parts of this debate have, again, descended into silly, ridiculous, hyperbole.
    No one denies Christ,
    his perfect life,
    innocent death,
    redemption for all mankind ,
    that Christ was the atoning sacrifice for all sin,
    and He made complete satisfaction of God’s demand for justice.
    No one denies faith.
    No one puts more emphasis on faith as anything other than that which clings to and receives the righteousness of Christ.
    No one denies that it is God’s grace through faith that results in salvation.
    No one states that all people are saved.
    No one denies that Man contributes nothing to his own salvation.
    No one really even denies the truth of justification, the declaration of righteousness.
    No one denies who receives the benefits of justification.
    The question at hand simply comes down to when justification occurs for the believer. Was it at the cross, or when a person comes to faith through the Holy Spirit?
    What should be, at best, a beneficial, uplifting discussion as we delve into the inerrant, infallible truth of God’s Word is instead a mishmash of half-truths, misrepresentations, and talking past each other. Both sides quote the same passages from Scripture, Luther, Chemnitz, and others without acknowledging that you may be making the same point! We all, myself included, need to repent where we have not taken our brothers’ (and sisters, Elizabeth) words and actions in the kindest possible way and with the best construction.
    I believe Christ has satisfied God’s justice and has paid the price for my sins, not only mine but the entire world. I believe faith is the working of the Holy Spirit to convert my sinful nature and bring me to salvation in Christ Jesus. I believe that those who have faith in Christ are declared righteous, and their sins are forgiven. I believe that those who do not have faith in Christ are not forgiven and still live as slaves to sin. I believe that on the Last Day, all will rise, the believers to eternal life, the unbelievers to eternal condemnation.
    On an entirely separate but related point, one that goes back to the history behind the original post: I believe Rev. Rydecki, through his studies, determined the doctrine of justification was not being taught correctly. I believe he was not given benefit of adequate inquiry and examination of his findings; his subsequent suspension and removal from WELS was an incorrect application of ecclesiastical supervision. I believe ELDoNA was correct in investigating and examining his statements before admitting him to their fellowship, and they found no fault. I believe ACLC is within their right to re-examine their fellowship with ELDoNA, but I believe their conclusions to be incorrect and detrimental to what could be a fruitful fellowship. I’m not a member of any synod, so have no particular dog in the fight, except for wanting these intra-Lutheran battles to cease.
    Grace and prayers for peace.

Seasonal Lutherans Disobey 2 Timothy 4:2 - Proclaim the Word. Be Urgent Best-Timesly, Worst-Timesly.

$
0
0



2 Timothy 4:2King James Version (KJV)

Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.

I learned long ago that for many stalwart Lutherans, there is a "right time."
A layman asked a well known LCMS figure to address a doctrinal issue. The celebrity said, "I would, but it is not the right time. I have to wait for the right time."
That is used so often that clergy nod their heads solemnly, acknowledging the importance of "the right time." The layman said to me, "That is ridiculous."
The use of this phrase shows once again that Lutherans no longer teach or believe in the efficacy of the Word. They seldom mention efficacy, if they even realize there is profound, consistent Biblical teaching on the topic. Lutheran leaders trust their political instincts, their ability to network with the right people, and their proficiency in ducking issues.
Pfotenhauer, the last conservative LCMS Synod President said, "Resist the beginnings." His grandson is an ELCA pastor. who took his congregation from the Missouri Synod into Shelob's Lair. The great-grandson is a politician's grandson.
Ever since old Pfotenhauer spoke those timeless words, few beginnings have been resisted in the LCMS or anywhere else, because a right time to resist seldom occurred.

The Greek terms are concise and dramatic, and I hope to capture their meaning in the future Living Surfer Dude Paraphrase of the Bible, a book so easy to understand that seminarians will say, "Why study Greek, bro? The work is already done for us. And it rocks."
The phrases are concise, staccato commands:
  • Proclaim the Word - imperative.
  • Be urgent - imperative. επιστηθι
  • At the best time - one Greek adverb, best-timeslyευκαιρως
  • At the worst time - one Greek adverb, worst-timselyακαιρως
κηρυξον τον λογον επιστηθι ευκαιρως ακαιρως ελεγξον επιτιμησον παρακαλεσον εν παση μακροθυμια και διδαχη

Here we can see the shocking truth of Paul's command - the time value has been removed. Ministers are to proclaim the Word of God at all times, not simply at the best time.

If Luther himself had followed the current standards, the Christian Church would no longer exist in any form. The Lutheran Reformation burned and raged throughout Europe and made people face the truth and utter falsehood, the Spirit in the Word cutting sharper than any double-edged sword. The Reformation did not establish the Lutheran Church or Protestantism in general. Both were spewed out of the herpetic mouth of Holy Mother Rome.

Rome had to face some reform itself, because corruption was so deep that Borgia Pope became a derogatory word understood by anyone with a little church history background. The Christian Church had lost almost all credibility during that time, so the power of the Spirit in the Word separated the wormy flour from the good flour, which was good for everyone involved.

I can count a number of famous Lutherans who have joined the Church of Rome - or Eastern Orthodoxy - during my short life. The conversion of Richard J. Neuhaus (son of the LCMS pastor we knew from Ontario) led to many other convesions -he was joined by Jaroslav Pelikan in Eastern Orthodoxy. One should pause to consider why the senior editor of Luther's Works would join another branch of Christianity altogether, at the end of his career, and donate $500,000 to their seminary. Did that not mark the beginning of the end?

Ironic note - when I contacted an Eastern Orthodox priest in researching Glende's give-away of a great church location on the Illinois university campus, the minister who took over the property invited me to consider EO in a kindly and friendly way. He did not stick a thumb in my eye, as LCMS, WELS, and CLC (sic) leaders do.

Not trusting the Word leads us to say, "I could say or write this, but bad things will happen to me if I do." In fact, many have objected to something and found themselves canned and trashed by their Lutheran sect. The problem is, the ministers want back in, which is a big mistake. If they cannot get themselves reconciled in their old sect, they give up altogether. And yet, teaching the Word of God will gather a congregation.

When I worked at Walmart for three months I found out that a number of older men, retired from great careers, were also working part-time. They wanted something to do, and they did not look down on becoming greeters or having another basic job. I learned a lot and had a great time. Why would an expelled but faithful pastor look down on being a tent-maker like Paul? Oh yes, that is only for a sermon illustration. Let's not take Paul's example seriously.

Preaching the Word at the best and worst times definitely brings the cross. However, innumerable blessings also grow from that experience. These blessings cannot be predicted or imagined in advance. Sometimes they arrive slowly, so slowly it seems forever. At other times many come in a rush.

This is an indication of what came from J. S. Bach's
Lutheran Orthodoxy.

Join the Ivy League. Be a Vine - Go to the Sunny Side. Vertical Gardening

$
0
0

Creation gardeners use and admire vines. The grounds are bound to fill up with various plants and flowers. Nothing compares to vines, because they work so hard, though slowly, at accomplishing their God-given mission in the yard.
Good for birds, a nightmare for the grounds crew.


We began with English Ivy on the front of the house. Time and watering of roses gave the English Ivy a chance to grow a little more. We had to cut it from the front porch, bury it under mulch in the rose garden. But the funniest was not even the slow climb up the front-door jam. Our grandson found that amusing. I looked at the picture-window ledge, and there was the vine, growing indoors and lifting up new leaves to the light.

English Ivy is invasive, but it is also attractive to bugs and birds. One bird sits on the vine and pecks at the rival he finds reflected back at him.

This is why I am growing my Hummingbird feeders
Trumpet Vine.


Trumpet Vine is both a nostalgia plant (my mother grew it) and a Hummingbird favorite. The catalog forgot to tell me that the vine grows slowly and will not flower until the third year. Last year the three plants grew a tiny bit and put out some leaves. This year the vine has grown far more in three locations without flowering. One vine likes the fence, with lots of support and access to sunlight and water. The Trumpet Vine on the maple, in the front-yard, is covering more area on the ground and climbing up the tree. I completely ignore the third location, with almost no watering, and the vine is growing there as well, but not as productively - less sun and water.



Morning Glories are always popular and easy to grow. Mr. Gardener stored his old vines near the fence last fall, and now we have them growing in abundance on the other side of the roses. He was worried that I might mind, but I was glad to see them. Every day I prune roses I look for vines reaching through the stabilize themselves on a rose bush. "Unhand that lady, you predator!" I mutter as I cut the rose loose from the vine.

The architecture of fast-growing vines is fascinating. The looping tendrils are delicate but strong. I had Pumpkin vines that tried to own Mrs. Wright's gate, since we shared fence, by wrapping itself firmly and redundantly around the mechanisms. The infrequent mowing by a friend allowed the vine to establish itself. Tearing a few vines loose only encouraged it to grow in other directions, but always upward toward the sun. Flowers and fruits also dominated on the sunny side.

Vines always grow toward the sun. Boston Ivy, which came from Japan, decorated Harvard at first, then Yale. Everyone liked it until the plant began to outgrow the maintenance teams. When they formed a league for football schools with more brain than brawn, they called it the Ivy League, which is now used to describe the group academically.

Vine growing directions are often - "plant on the shady side of the house."Boston Ivy will sit there and not grow in bright sunlight, but give it a challenge and it will reach for more light. The same is true of English Ivy.

Our Pumpkin Vine grew right to the top of the chain link fence and spread its largest leaves out on top to catch the most sun.

Norma Boeckler's butterfly.
Butterflies need specific plants for laying eggs
and for adult food. Some require specific vines.
Some people are content to stay where they are and never question anything. After all, look at how a bit of intellectual curiosity has created so much trouble for some.

But like vines, we were created to reach for the light. In Genesis 1, light was created before the sun and stars. From the Biblical viewpoint, Christ is the True Light that extinguishes darkness. That is completely consistent with Genesis 1 and John 1.

John 1:3 All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
--
John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the Light of the World: he that followeth Me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.


Luther's Sermon on Letter and Spirit of the Law. 2 Corinthians 3:4-11

$
0
0


SERMONS OF MARTIN LUTHER - TWELFTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY, 2 Corinthians 3:4-11


TEXT:

2 CORINTHIANS 3:4-11. 4 And such confidence have we through Christ to God-ward: 5 not that we are sufficient of ourselves, to account anything as from ourselves; but our sufficiency is from God; 6 who also made us sufficient as ministers of a new covenant; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. 7 But if the ministration of death, written, and engraven on stones, came with glory, so that the children of Israel could not look steadfastly upon the face of Moses for the glory of his face; which glory was passing away: 8 how shall not rather the ministration of the spirit be with glory? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation hath glory, much rather doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For verily that which hath been made glorious hath not been made glorious in this respect, by reason of the glory that surpasseth. 11 For if that which passeth away was with glory, much more that which remaineth is in glory.

GOSPEL TRANSCENDS LAW.

1. This epistle lesson sounds altogether strange and wonderful to individuals unaccustomed to Scripture language, particularly to that of Paul. To the inexperienced ear and heart it is not intelligible. In popedom thus far it has remained quite unapprehended, although reading of the words has been practiced.

2. That we may understand it, we must first get an idea of Paul’s theme.

Briefly, he would oppose the vain boasting of false apostles and preachers concerning their possession of the spirit and their peculiar skill and gifts, by praising and glorifying the office of a preacher of the Gospel with which he is intrusted. For he found that, especially in the Church at Corinth, which he had converted by the words of his own lips and brought to faith in Christ, soon after his departure the devil introduced his heresies whereby the people were turned from the truth and betrayed into other ways. Since it became his duty to make an attack upon such heresies, he devoted both his epistles to the purpose of keeping the Corinthians in the right way, so that they might retain the pure doctrine received from him, and beware of false spirits. The main thing which moved him to write this second epistle was his desire to emphasize to them his apostolic office of a preacher of the Gospel, in order to put to shame the glory of those other teachers — the glory they boasted with many words and great pretense.

3. He starts in on this theme just before he reaches our text. And this is how it is he comes to speak in high terms of praise of the ministration of the Gospel and to contrast and compare the twofold ministration or message which may be proclaimed in the Church, provided, of course, that God’s Word is to be preached and not the nonsense of human falsehood and the doctrine of the devil. One is that of the Old Testament, the other of the New; in other words, the office of Moses, or the Law, and the office of the Gospel of Christ. He contrasts the glory and power of the latter with those of the former, which, it is true, is also the Word of God. In this manner he endeavors to defeat the teachings and pretensions of those seductive spirits who, as he but lately foretold, pervert God’s Word, in that they greatly extol the Law of God, yet at best do not teach its right use, but, instead of making it tributary to faith in Christ, misuse it to teach work-righteousness.

4. Since the words before us are in reality a continuation of those with which the chapter opens, the latter must be considered in this connection.

We read: “Are we beginning again to commend ourselves? or need we, as do some, epistles of commendation to you or from you? Ye are our epistle, written in our hearts, known and read of all men; being made manifest that ye are an epistle of Christ, ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in tables that are hearts of flesh.” “We, my fellow-apostles and co-laborers and I,” he says, “do not ask for letters and seals from others commending us to you, or from you commending us to others, in order to seduce people after gaining their good will in your church and in others as well. Such is the practice of the false apostles, and many even now present letters and certificates from honest preachers and Churches, and make them the means whereby their unrighteous plotting may be received in good faith. Such letters, thank God, we stand not in need of, and you need not fear we shall use such means of deception. For you are yourselves the letter we have written and wherein we may pride ourselves and which we present everywhere. For it is a matter of common knowledge that you have been taught by us, and brought to Christ through our ministry.”

PAUL’S CONVERTS LIVING EPISTLES.

5. Inasmuch as his activity among them is his testimonial, and they themselves are aware that through his ministerial office he has constituted them a church, he calls them an epistle written by himself; not with ink and in paragraphs, not on paper or wood, nor engraved upon hard rock as the Ten Commandments written upon tables of stone, which Moses placed before the people, but written by the Holy Spirit upon fleshly tables — hearts of tender flesh. The Spirit is the ink or the inscription, yes, even the writer himself; but the pencil or pen and the hand of the writer is the ministry of Paul.

6. This figure of a written epistle is, however, in accord with Scripture usage. Moses commands ( Deuteronomy 6:6-9; 11, 18) that the Israelites write the Ten Commandments in all places where they walked or stood — upon the posts of their houses, and upon their gates, and ever have them before their eyes and in their hearts. Again ( Proverbs 7:2-3), Solomon says: “Keep my commandments and . . . my law as the apple of thine eye. Bind them upon thy fingers; write them upon the tablet of thy heart.” He speaks as a father to his child when giving the child an earnest charge to remember a certain thing — “Dear child, remember this; forget it not; keep it in thy heart.” Likewise, God says in the book of Jeremiah the prophet ( Jeremiah 31:33), “I will put my law in their inward parts, and in their heart will I write it.” Here man’s heart is represented as a sheet, or slate, or page, whereon is written the preached Word; for the heart is to receive and securely keep the Word. In this sense Paul says: “We have, by our ministry, written a booklet or letter upon your heart, which witnesses that you believe in God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost and have the assurance that through Christ you are redeemed and saved. This testimony is what is written on your heart. The letters are not characters traced with ink or crayon, but the living thoughts, the fire and force of the heart.

7. Note further, that it is his ministry to which Paul ascribes the preparation of their heart thereon and the inscription which constitutes them “living epistles of Christ.” He contrasts his ministry with the blind fancies of those fanatics who seek to receive, and dream of having, the Holy Spirit without the oral word; who, perchance, creep into a corner and grasp the Spirit through dreams, directing the people away from the preached Word and visible ministry. But Paul says that the Spirit, through his preaching, has wrought in the hearts of his Corinthians, to the end that Christ lives and is mighty in them. After such statement he bursts into praise of the ministerial office, comparing the message, or preaching, of Moses with that of himself and the apostles. He says: “Such confidence have we through Christ to God-ward: not that we are sufficient of ourselves, to account anything as from ourselves; but our sufficiency is from God.”

TRUE PREACHERS COMMISSIONED BY GOD.

8. These words are blows and thrusts for the false apostles and preachers.

Paul is mortal enemy to the blockheads who make great boast, pretending to what they do not possess and to what they cannot do; who boast of having the Spirit in great measure; who are ready to counsel and aid the whole world; who pride themselves on the ability to invent something new.

It is to be a surpassingly precious and heavenly thing they are to spin out of their heads, as the dreams of pope and monks have been in time past. “We do not so,” says Paul. “We rely not upon ourselves or our wisdom and ability. We preach not what we have ourselves invented. But this is our boast and trust in Christ before God, that we have made of you a divine epistle; have written upon your hearts, not our thoughts, but the Word of God. We are not, however, glorifying our own power, but the works and the power of him who has called and equipped us for such an office; from whom proceeds all you have heard and believed.

9. It is a glory which every preacher may claim, to be able to say with full confidence of heart: “This trust have I toward God in Christ, that what I teach and preach is truly the Word of God.” Likewise, when he performs other official duties in the Church — baptizes a child, absolves and comforts a sinner — it must be done in the same firm conviction that such is the command of Christ.

10. He who would teach and exercise authority in the Church without this glory, “it is profitable for him,” as Christ says ( Matthew 18:6), “that a great millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be sunk in the depths of the sea.” For the devil’s lies he preaches, and death is what he effects. Our Papists, in time past, after much and long-continued teaching, after many inventions and works whereby they hoped to be saved, nevertheless always doubted in heart and mind whether or no they had pleased God. The teaching and works of all heretics and seditious spirits certainly do not bespeak for them trust in Christ; their own glory is the object of their teaching, and the homage and praise of the people is the goal of their desire. “Not that we are sufficient of ourselves, to account anything as from ourselves.”

11. As said before, this is spoken in denunciation of the false spirits who believe that by reason of eminent equipment of special creation and election, they are called to come to the rescue of the people, expecting wonders from whatever they say and do.

HUMAN DOCTRINE NO PLACE IN THE CHURCH.

12. Now, we know ourselves to be of the same clay whereof they are made; indeed, we perhaps have the greater call from God: yet we cannot boast of being capable of ourselves to advise or aid men. We cannot even originate an idea calculated to give help. And when it comes to the knowledge of how one may stand before God and attain to eternal life, that is truly not to be achieved by our work or power, nor to originate in our brain. In other things, those pertaining to this temporal life, you may glory in what you know, you may advance the teachings of reason, you may invent ideas of your own; for example: how to make shoes or clothes, how to govern a household, how to manage a herd. In such things exercise your mind to the best of your ability. Cloth or leather of this sort will permit itself to be stretched and cut according to the good pleasure of the tailor or shoemaker. But in spiritual matters, human reasoning certainly is not in order; other intelligence, other skill and power, are requisite here — something to be granted by God himself and revealed through his Word.

13. What mortal has ever discovered or fathomed the truth that the three persons in the eternal divine essence are one God; that the second person, the Son of God, was obliged to become man, born of a virgin; and that no way of life could be opened for us, save through his crucifixion? Such truth never would have been heard nor preached, would never in all eternity have been published, learned and believed, had not God himself revealed it.

14. For this season they are blind fools of first magnitude and dangerous characters who would boast of their grand performances, and think that the people are served when they preach their own fancies and inventions. It has been the practice in the Church for anyone to introduce any teaching he saw fit; for example, the monks and priests have daily produced new saints, pilgrimages, special prayers, works and sacrifices in the effort to blot out sin, redeem souls from purgatory, and so on. They who make up things of this kind are not such as put their trust in God through Christ, but rather such as defy God and Christ. Into the hearts of men, where Christ alone should be, they shove the filth and write the lies of the devil. Yet they think themselves, and themselves only, qualified for all essential teaching and work, self-grown doctors that they are, saints all-powerful without the help of God and Christ. “But our sufficiency is from God.”

15. Of ourselves — in our own wisdom and strength — we cannot effect, discover nor teach any counsel or help for man, whether for ourselves or others. Any good work we perform among you, any doctrine we write upon your heart — that is God’s own work. He puts into our heart and mouth what we should say, and impresses it upon your heart through the Holy Spirit. Therefore, we cannot ascribe to ourselves any honor therein, cannot seek our own glory as the self-instructed and proud spirits do; we must give to God alone the honor, and must glory in the fact that by his grace and power he works in you unto salvation, through the office committed unto us.

16. Now, Paul’s thought here is that nothing should be taught and practiced in the Church but what is unquestionably God’s Word. It will not do to introduce or perform anything whatever upon the strength of man’s judgment. Man’s achievements, man’s reasoning and power, are of no avail save in so far as they come from God. As Peter says in his first epistle ( 1 Peter 4:11): “If any man speaketh, speaking as it were oracles of God; if any man ministereth, ministering as of the strength which God supplieth.” In short, let him who would be wise, who would boast of great skill, talents and power, confine himself to things other than spiritual; with respect to spiritual matters, let him keep his place and refrain from boasting and pretense. For it is of no moment that men observe your greatness and ability; the important thing is that poor souls may rest assured of being presented with God’s Word and works, whereby they may be saved. “Who also made us sufficient as ministers of a new covenant; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.”

THE NEW COVENANT.

17. Paul here proceeds to exalt the office and power of the Gospel over the glorying of the false apostles, and to elevate the power of the Word above that of all other doctrine, even of the Law of God. Truly we are not sufficient of ourselves and have nothing to boast of so far as human activity is considered. For that is without merit or power, however strenuous the effort may be to fulfill God’s Law. We have, however, something infinitely better to boast of, something not grounded in our own activity: by God we have been made sufficient for a noble ministry, termed the ministry “of a New Covenant.” This ministry is not only exalted far above any teaching to be evolved by human wisdom, skill and power, but is more glorious than the ministry termed the “Old Covenant,” which in time past was delivered to the Jews through Moses. While this ministry clings, in common with other doctrine, to the Word given by revelation, it is the agency whereby the Holy Spirit works in the heart. Therefore, Paul says it is not a ministration of the letter, but “of the spirit.” “SPIRIT” AND “LETTER.”

18. This passage relative to spirit and letter has in the past been wholly strange language to us. Indeed, to such extent has man’s nonsensical interpretation perverted and weakened it that I, through a learned doctor of the holy Scriptures, failed to understand it altogether, and I could find no one to teach me. And to this day it is unintelligible to all popedom. In fact, even the old teachers — Origen, Jerome and others — have not caught Paul’s thought. And no wonder, truly! For it is essentially a doctrine far beyond the power of man’s intelligence to comprehend. When human reason meddles with it, it becomes perplexed. The doctrine is wholly unintelligible to it, for human thought goes no farther than the Law and the Ten Commandments. Laying hold upon these it confines itself to them. It does not attempt to do more, being governed by the principle that unto him who fulfils the demands of the Law, or commandments, God is gracious.

Reason knows nothing about the wretchedness of depraved nature. It does not recognize the fact that no man is able to keep God’s commandments; that all are under sin and condemnation; and that the only way whereby help could be received was for God to give his Son for the world, ordaining another ministration, one through which grace and reconciliation might be proclaimed to us. Now, he who does not understand the sublime subject of which Paul speaks cannot but miss the true meaning of his words. How much more did we invite this fate when we threw the Scriptures and Saint Paul’s epistles under the bench, and, like swine in husks, wallowed in man’s nonsense! Therefore, we must submit to correction and learn to understand the apostle’s utterance aright.

19. “Letter” and “spirit” have been understood to mean, according to Origen and Jerome, the obvious sense of the written word. St. Augustine, it must be admitted, has gotten an inkling of the truth. Now, the position of the former teachers would perhaps not be quite incorrect did they correctly explain the words. By “literary sense” they signify the meaning of a Scripture narrative according to the ordinary interpretation of the words.

By “spiritual sense” they signify the secondary, hidden, sense found in the words.

For instance: The Scripture narrative in Genesis third records how the serpent persuaded the woman to eat of the forbidden fruit and to give to her husband, who also ate This narrative in its simplest meaning represents what they understand by “letter.” “Spirit,” however, they understand to mean the spiritual interpretation, which is thus: The serpent signifies the evil temptation which lures to sin. The woman represents the sensual state, or the sphere in which such enticements and temptations make themselves felt. Adam, the man, stands for reason, which is called man’s highest endowment. Now, when reason does not yield to the allurements of external sense, all is well; but when it permits itself to waver and consent, the fall has taken place.

20. Origen was the first to trifle thus with the holy Scriptures, and many others followed, until now it is thought to be the sign of great cleverness for the Church to be filled with such quibblings. The aim is to imitate Paul, who ( Galatians 4:22-24) figuratively interprets the story of Abraham’s two sons, the one by the free woman, or the mistress of the house, and the other by the hand-maid. The two women, Paul says, represent the two covenants: one covenant makes only bondservants, which is just what he in our text terms the ministration of the letter; the other leads to liberty, or, as he says here, the ministration of the spirit, which gives life. And the two sons are the two peoples, one of which does not go farther than the Law, while the other accepts in faith the Gospel. True, this is an interpretation not directly suggested by the narrative and the text. Paul himself calls it an allegory; that is, a mystic narrative, or a story with a hidden meaning. But he does not say that the literal text is necessarily the letter that killeth, and the allegory, or hidden meaning, the spirit. But the false teachers assert of all Scripture that the text, or record itself, is but a dead “letter,” its interpretation being “the spirit.” Yet they have not pushed interpretation farther than the teaching of the Law; and it is precisely the Law which Paul means when he speaks of “the letter.”* 21. Paul employs the word “letter” in such contemptuous sense in reference to the Law — though the Law is, nevertheless, the Word of God — when he compares it with the ministry of the Gospel. The letter is to him the doctrine of the Ten Commandments, which teach how we should obey God, honor parents, love our neighbor, and so on — the very best doctrine to be found in all books, sermons and schools.

The word “letter” is to the apostle Paul everything which may take the form of doctrine of literary arrangement, of record, so long as it remains something spoken or written. Also thoughts which may be pictured or expressed by word or writing, but it is not that which is written in the heart, to become its life. “Letter” is the whole Law of Moses, or the Ten Commandments, though the supreme authority of such teaching is not denied. It matters not whether you hear them, read them, or reproduce them mentally. For instance, when I sit down to meditate upon the first commandment: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me,” or the second, or the third, and so forth, I have something which I can read, write, discuss, and aim to fulfill with all my might. The process is quite similar when the emperor or prince gives a command and says: “This you shall do, that you shall eschew.” This is what the apostle calls “the letter,” or, as we have called it on another occasion, the written sense.

22. Now, as opposed to “the letter,” there is another doctrine or message, which he terms the “ministration of a New Covenant” and “of the Spirit.”

This doctrine does not teach what works are required of man, for that man has already heard; but it makes known to him what God would do for him and bestow upon him, indeed what he has already done: he has given his Son Christ for us; because, for our disobedience to the Law, which no man fulfils, we were under God’s wrath and condemnation. Christ made satisfaction for our sins, effected a reconciliation with God and gave to us his own righteousness. Nothing is said in this ministration of man’s deeds; it tells rather of the works of Christ, who is unique in that he was born of a virgin, died for sin and rose from the dead, something no other man has been able to do. This doctrine is revealed through none but the Holy Spirit, and none other confers the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit works in the hearts of them who hear and accept the doctrine. Therefore, this ministration is termed a ministration “of the Spirit.”

23. The apostle employs the words “letter” and “spirit,” to contrast the two doctrines; to emphasize his office and show its advantage over all others, however eminent the teachers whom they boast, and however great the spiritual unction which they vaunt. It is of design that he does not term the two dispensations “Law” and “Gospel,” but names them according to the respective effects produced. He honors the Gospel with a superior term — “ministration of the spirit.” Of the Law, on the contrary, he speaks almost contemptuously, as if he would not honor it with the title of God’s commandment, which in reality it is, according to his own admission later on that its deliverance to Moses and its injunction upon the children of Israel was an occasion of surpassing glory.

24. Why does Paul choose this method? Is it right for one to despise or dishonor God’s Law? Is not a chaste and honorable life a matter of beauty and godliness? Such facts, it may be contended, are implanted by God in reason itself, and all books teach them; they are the governing force in the world. I reply: Paul’s chief concern is to defeat the vainglory and pretensions of false preachers, and to teach them the right conception and appreciation of the Gospel which he proclaimed. What Paul means is this:

When the Jews vaunt their Law of Moses, which was received as Law from God and recorded upon two tables of stone; when they vaunt their learned and saintly preachers of the Law and its exponents, and hold their deeds and manner of life up to admiration, what is all that compared to the Gospel message? The claim may be well made: a fine sermon, a splendid exposition; but, after all, nothing more comes of it than precepts, expositions, written comments. The precept, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself,” remains a mere array of words. When much time and effort have been spent in conforming one’s life to it, nothing has been accomplished. You have pods without peas, husks without kernels.

25. For it is impossible to keep the Law without Christ, though man may, for the sake of honor or property, or from fear of punishment, feign outward holiness. The heart which does not discern God’s grace in Christ cannot turn to God nor trust in him; it cannot love his commandments and delight in them, but rather resists them. For nature rebels at compulsion.

No man likes to be a captive in chains. One does not voluntarily bow to the rod of punishment or submit to the executioner’s sword; rather, because of these things, his anger against the Law is but increased, and he ever thinks: “Would that I might unhindered steal, rob, hoard, gratify my lust, and so on!” And when restrained by force, he would there were no Law and no God. And this is the case where conduct shows some effects of discipline, in that the outer man has been subjected to the teaching of the Law.

26. But in a far more appalling degree does inward rebellion ensue when the heart feels the full force of the Law; when, standing before God’s judgment, it feels the sentence of condemnation; as we shall presently hear, for the apostle says “the letter killeth.” Then the truly hard knots appear.

Human nature fumes and rages against the Law; offenses appear in the heart, the fruit of hate and enmity against the Law; and presently human nature flees before God and is incensed at God’s judgment. It begins to question the equity of his dealings, to ask if he is a just God. Influenced by such thoughts, it falls ever deeper into doubt, it murmurs and chafes, until finally, unless the Gospel comes to the rescue, it utterly despairs, as did Judas, and Saul, and perhaps pass out of this life with God and creation.

This is what Paul means when he says ( Romans 7:8-9) that the Law works sin in the heart of man, and sin works death, or kills. 27. You see, then, why the Law is called “the letter”: though noble doctrine, it remains on the surface; it does not enter the heart as a vital force which begets obedience. Such is the baseness of human nature, it will not and cannot conform to the Law; and so corrupt is mankind, there is no individual who does not violate all God’s commandments inspite of daily hearing the preached Word and having held up to view God’s wrath and eternal condemnation. Indeed, the harder pressed man is, the more furiously he storms against the Law.

28. The substance of the matter is this: When all the commandments have been put together, when their message receives every particle of praise to which it is entitled, it is still a mere letter. That is, teaching not put into practice. By “letter” is signified all manner of law, doctrine and message, which goes no farther than the oral or written word, which consists only of the powerless letter. To illustrate: A law promulgated by a prince or the authorities of a city, if not enforced, remains merely an open letter, which makes a demand indeed, but ineffectually. Similarly, God’s Law, although a teaching of supreme authority and the eternal will of God, must suffer itself to become a mere empty letter or husk. Without a quickening heart, and devoid of fruit, the Law is powerless to effect life and salvation. It may well be called a veritable table of omissions (Lass-tafel); that is, it is a written enumeration, not of duties performed but of duties cast aside. In the languages of the world, it is a royal edict which remains unobserved and unperformed. In this light St. Augustine understood the Law. He says, commenting on Psalm 17, “What is Law without grace but a letter without spirit?” Human nature, without the aid of Christ and his grace, cannot keep it.

29. Again, Paul in terming the Gospel a “ministration of the spirit” would call attention to its power to produce in the hearts of men an effect wholly different from that of the Law: it is accompanied by the Holy Spirit and it creates a new heart. Man, driven into fear and anxiety by the preaching of the Law, hears this Gospel message, which, instead of reminding him of God’s demands, tells him what God has done for him. It points not to man’s works, but to the works of Christ, and bids him confidently believe that for the sake of his Son God will forgive his sins and accept him as his child. And this message, when received in faith, immediately cheers and comforts the heart. The heart will no longer flee from God; rather it turns to him. Finding grace with God and experiencing his mercy, the heart feels drawn to him. It commences to call upon him and to treat and revere him as its beloved God. In proportion as such faith and solace grow, also love for the commandments will grow and obedience to them will be man’s delight. Therefore, God would have his Gospel message urged unceasingly as the means of awakening man’s heart to discern his state and recall the great grace and lovingkindness of God, with the result that the power of the Holy Spirit is increased constantly. Note, no influence of the Law, no work of man is present here. The force is a new and heavenly one — the power of the Holy Spirit. He impresses upon the heart Christ and his works, making of it a true book which does not consist in the tracery of mere letters and words, but in true life and action.

30. God promised of old, in Joel 2:28 and other passages, to give the Spirit through the new message, the Gospel. And he has verified his promise by public manifestations in connection with the preaching of that Gospel, as on the day of Pentecost and again later. When the apostles, Peter and others, began to preach, the Holy Spirit descended visibly from heaven upon their hearts. Acts 8:17; Acts 10:44. Up to that time, throughout the period the Law was preached, no one had heard or seen such manifestation. The fact could not but be grasped that this was a vastly different message from that of the Law when such mighty results followed in its train. And yet its substance was no more than what Paul declared (Acts 13, 38-39): “Through this man is proclaimed unto you remission of sins: and by him every one that believeth is justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.”

31. In this teaching you see no more the empty letters, the valueless husks or shells, of the Law, which unceasingly enjoins, “This thou shalt do and observe,” and ever in vain. You see instead the true kernel and power which confers Christ and the fullness of His Spirit. In consequence, men heartily believe the message of the Gospel and enjoy its riches. They are accounted as having fulfilled the Ten Commandments. John says ( John 1:16-17): “Of his fullness we all received, and grace for grace. For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.”

John’s thought is: The Law has indeed been given by Moses, but what avails that fact? To be sure, it is a noble doctrine and portrays a beautiful and instructive picture of man’s duty to God and all mankind; it is really excellent as to the letter. Yet it remains empty; it does not enter into the heart. Therefore it is called “law,” nor can it become aught else, so long as nothing more is given.

CHRIST SUPERSEDES MOSES.

Before there can be fulfillment, another than Moses must come, bringing another doctrine. Instead of a law enjoined, there must be grace and truth revealed. For to enjoin a command and to embody the truth* are two different things; just as teaching and doing differ. Moses, it is true, teaches the doctrine of the Law, so far as exposition is concerned, but he can neither fulfill it himself nor give others the ability to do so. That it might be fulfilled, God’s Son had to come with his fullness; he has fulfilled the Law for himself and it is he who communicates to our empty heart the power to attain to the same fullness.

This becomes possible when we receive grace for grace, that is, when we come to the enjoyment of Christ, and for the sake of him who enjoys with God fullness of grace, although our own obedience to the Law is still imperfect. Being possessed of solace and grace, we receive by his power the Holy Spirit also, so that, instead of harboring mere empty letters within us, we come to the truth and begin to fulfill God’s Law, in such a way, however, that we draw from his fullness and drink from that as a fountain.

CHRIST THE SOURCE OF LIFE GREATER THAN ADAM THE SOURCE OF DEATH.

32. Paul gives us the same thought in Romans 5, 17-18, where he compares Adam and Christ. Adam, he says, by his disobedience in Paradise, became the source of sin and death in the world; by the sin of this one man, condemnation passed upon all men. But on the other hand, Christ, by his obedience and righteousness, has become for us the abundant source wherefrom all may obtain righteousness and the power of obedience. And with respect to the latter source, it is far richer and more abundant than the former. While by the single sin of one man, sin and death passed upon all men, to wax still more powerful with the advent of the Law, of such surpassing strength and greatness, on the other hand, is the grace and bounty which we have in Christ that it not only washes away the particular sin of the one man Adam, which, until Christ came, overwhelmed all men in death, but overwhelms and blots out all sin whatever. Thus they who receive his fullness of grace and bounty unto righteousness are, according to Paul, lords of life through Jesus Christ alone.

THE LAW INEFFECTUAL.

33. You see now how the two messages differ, and why Paul exalts the one, the preaching of the Gospel, and calls it a “ministration of the spirit,” but terms the other, the Law, a mere empty “letter.” His object is to humble the pride of the false apostles and preachers which they felt in their Judaism and the law of Moses, telling the people with bold pretensions: “Beloved, let Paul preach what he will, he cannot overthrow Moses, who on Mount Sinai received the Law, God’s irrevocable command, obedience to which is ever the only way to salvation.”

34. Similarly today, Papists, Anabaptists and other sects make outcry: “What mean you by preaching so much about faith and Christ? Are the people thereby made better? Surely works are essential.” Arguments of this character have indeed a semblance of merit, but, when examined by the light of truth, are mere empty, worthless twaddle. For if deeds, or works, are to be considered, there are the Ten Commandments; we teach and practice these as well as they. The Commandments would answer the purpose indeed — if one could preach them so effectively as to compel their fulfilment.

But the question is, whether what is preached is also practiced. Is there something more than were words — or letters, as Paul says? do the words result in life and spirit? This message we have in common; unquestionably, one must teach the Ten Commandments, and, what is more, live them. But we charge that they are not observed. Therefore something else is requisite in order to render obedience to them possible. When Moses and the Law are made to say: “You should do thus; God demands this of you,” what does it profit? Ay, beloved Moses, I hear that plainly, and it is certainly a righteous command; but pray tell me whence shall I obtain ability to do what, alas, I never have done nor can do? It is not easy to spend money from an empty pocket, or to drink from an empty can. If I am to pay my debt, or to quench my thirst, tell me how first to fill pocket or can. But upon this point such prattlers are silent; they but continue to drive and plague with the Law, let the people stick to their sins, and make merry of them to their own hurt.

35. In this light Paul here portrays the false apostles and like pernicious schismatics, who make great boasts of having a clearer understanding and of knowing much better what to teach than is the case with true preachers of the Gospel. And when they do their very best, when they pretend great things, and do wonders with their preaching, there is naught but the mere empty “letter.” Indeed, their message falls far short of Moses. Moses was a noble preacher, truly, and wrought greater things than any of them may do.

Nevertheless, the doctrine of the Law could do no more than remain a letter, an Old Testament, and God had to ordain a different doctrine, a New Testament, which should impart the “spirit.” “It is the letter,” says Paul, “which we preach. If any glorying is to be done, we can glory in better things and make the defiant plea that they are not the only teachers of what ought to be done, incapable as they are of carrying out their own precepts. We give direction and power as to performing and living those precepts. For this reason our message is not called the Old Testament, or the message of the dead letter, but that of the New Testament and of the living Spirit.”

36. No seditious spirit, it is certain, ever carries out its own precepts, nor will he ever be capable of doing so, though he may loudly boast the Spirit alone as his guide. Of this fact you may rest assured. For such individuals know nothing more than the doctrine of works — nor can they rise higher and point you to anything else. They may indeed speak of Christ, but it is only to hold him up as an example of patience in suffering. In short, there can be no New Testament preached if the doctrine of faith in Christ be left out; the spirit cannot enter into the heart, but all teaching, endeavor, reflection, works and power remain mere “letters,” devoid of grace, truth, and life. Without Christ the heart remains unchanged and unrenewed. It has no more power to fulfill the Law than the book in which the Ten Commandments are written, or the stones upon which engraved. “For the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.”

37. Here is yet stronger condemnation of the glory of the doctrine of the Law; yet higher exaltation of the Gospel ministry. Is the apostle overbold in that he dares thus to assail the Law and say: “The Law is not only a lifeless letter, but qualified merely to kill”? Surely that is not calling the Law a good and profitable message, but one altogether harmful. Who, unless he would be a cursed heretic in the eyes of the world and invite execution as a blasphemer, would dare to speak thus, except Paul himself?

Even Paul must praise the Law, which is God’s command, declaring it good and not to be despised nor in any way modified, but to be confirmed and fulfilled so completely, as Christ says ( Matthew 5:18), that not a tittle of it shall pass away. How, then, does Paul come to speak so disparagingly, even abusively, of the Law, actually presenting it as veritable death and poison? Well, his is a sublime doctrine, one that reason does not understand. The world, particularly they who would be called holy and godly, cannot tolerate it at all; for it amounts to nothing short of pronouncing all our works, however precious, mere death and poison.

38. Paul’s purpose is to bring about the complete overthrow of the boast of the false teachers and hypocrites, and to reveal the weakness of their doctrine, showing how little it effects even at its best, since it offers only the Law, Christ remaining unproclaimed and unknown. They say in terms of vainglorious eloquence that if a man diligently keep the commandments and do many good works, he shall be saved. But theirs are only vain words, a pernicious doctrine. This fact is eventually learned by him who, having heard no other doctrine, trusts in their false one. He finds out that it holds neither comfort nor power of life, but only doubt and anxiety, followed by death and destruction.

TERRORS OF THE LAW.

39. When man, conscious of his failure to keep God’s command, is constantly urged by the Law to make payment of his debt and confronted with nothing but the terrible wrath of God and eternal condemnation, he cannot but sink into despair over his sins. Such is the inevitable consequence where the Law alone is taught with a view to attaining heaven thereby. The vanity of such trust in works is illustrated in the case of the noted hermit mentioned in Vitae Patrum (Lives of the Fathers). For over seventy years this hermit had led a life of utmost austerity, and had many followers. When the hour of death carne he began to tremble, and for three days was in a state of agony. His disciples came to comfort him, exhorting him to die in peace since he had led so holy a life. But he replied: “Alas, I truly have all my life served Christ and lived austerely; but God’s judgment greatly differs from that of men.”

40. Note, this worthy man, despite the holiness of his life, has no acquaintance with any article but that of the divine judgment according to the Law. He knows not the comfort of Christ’s Gospel. After a long life spent in the attempt to keep God’s commandments and secure salvation, the Law now slays him through his own works. He is compelled to exclaim: “Alas, who knows how God will look upon my efforts? Who may stand before him?” That means, to forfeit heaven through the verdict of his own conscience. The work he has wrought and his holiness of life avail nothing. They merely push him deeper into death, since he is without the solace of the Gospel, while others, such as the thief on the cross and the publican, grasp the comfort of the Gospel, the forgiveness of sins in Christ.

Thus sin is conquered; they escape the sentence of the Law, and pass through death into life eternal.

EFFICACY OF THE GOSPEL.

41. Now the meaning of the contrasting clause, “the spirit giveth life,” becomes clear. The reference is to naught else but the holy Gospel, a message of healing and salvation; a precious, comforting word. It comforts and refreshes the sad heart. It wrests it out of the jaws of death and hell, as it were, and transports it to the certain hope of eternal life, through faith in Christ. When the last hour comes to the believer, and death and God’s judgment appear before his eyes, he does not base his comfort upon his works. Even though he may have lived the holiest life possible, he says with Paul ( 1 Corinthians 4:4): “I know nothing against myself, yet am I not hereby justified.”

42. These words imply being ill pleased with self, with the whole life; indeed, even the putting to death of self. Though the heart says, “By my works I am neither made righteous nor saved,” which is practically admitting oneself to be worthy of death and condemation, the Spirit extricates from despair, through the Gospel faith, which confesses, as did St. Bernard in the hour of death: “Dear Lord Jesus, I am aware that my life at its best has been but worthy of condemnation, but I trust in the fact that thou hast died for me and hast sprinkled me with blood from thy holy wounds. For I have been baptized in thy name and have given heed to thy Word whereby thou hast called me, awarded me grace and life, and bidden me believe. In this assurance will I pass out of life; not in uncertainty and anxiety, thinking, Who knows what sentence God in heaven will pass upon me?”

The Christian must not utter such a question. The sentence against his life and works has long since been passed by the Law. Therefore, he must confess himself guilty and condemned. But he lives by the gracious judgment of God declared from heaven, whereby the sentence of the Law is overruled and reversed. It is this: “He that believeth on the Son hath eternal life.” John 3:36.

43. When the consolation of the Gospel has once been received and it has wrested the heart from death and the terrors of hell, the Spirit’s influence is felt. By its power God’s Law begins to live in man’s heart; he loves it, delights in it and enters upon its fulfillment. Thus eternal life begins here, being continued forever and perfected in the life to come.

44. Now you see how much more glorious, how much better, is the doctrine of the apostles — the New Testament — than the doctrine of those who preach merely great works and holiness without Christ. We should see in this fact an incentive to hear the Gospel with gladness. We ought joyfully to thank God for it when we learn how it has power to bring to men life and eternal salvation, and when it gives us assurance that the Holy Spirit accompanies it and is imparted to believers. “But if the ministration of death, written, and engraven on stones, came with glory, so that the children of Israel could not look steadfastly upon the face of Moses for the glory of his face; which glory was passing away: how shall not rather the ministration of the Spirit be with glory? For if the ministration of condemnation hath glory, much rather doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory.”

GLORY OF THE GOSPEL.

45. Paul is in an ecstasy of delight, and his heart overflows in words of praise for the Gospel. Again he handles the Law severely, calling it a ministration, or doctrine, of death and condemnation. What term significant of greater abomination could he apply to God’s Law than to call it a doctrine of death and hell? And again ( Galatians 2:17), he calls it a “minister (or preacher) of sin ;” and ( Galatians 3:10) the message which proclaims a curse, saying, “As many as are of the works of the law are under a curse.” Absolute, then, is the conclusion that Law and works are powerless to justify before God; for how can a doctrine proclaiming only sin, death and condemnation justify and save?

46. Paul is compelled to speak thus, as we said above because of the infamous presumption of both teachers and pupils, in that they permit flesh and blood to coquet with the Law, and make their own works which they bring before God their boast. Yet, nothing is effected but self-deception and destruction. For, when the Law is viewed in its true light, when its “glory,” as Paul has it, is revealed, it is found to do nothing more than to kill man and sink him into condemnation.

47. Therefore, the Christian will do well to learn this text of Paul and have an armor against the boasting of false teachers, and the torments and trials of the devil when he urges the Law and induces men to seek righteousness in their own works, tormenting their heart with the thought that salvation is dependent upon the achievements of the individual. The Christian will do well to learn this text, I say, so that in such conflicts he may take the devil’s own sword, saying: “Why dost thou annoy me with talk of the Law and my works? What is the Law after all, however much you may preach it to me, but that which makes me feel the weight of sin, death and condemnation? Why should I seek therein righteousness before God?”

48. When Paul speaks of the “glory of the Law,” of which the Jewish teachers of work-righteousness boast, he has reference to the things narrated in the twentieth and thirty-fourth chapters of Exodus — how, when the Law was given, God descended in majesty and glory from heaven, and there were thunderings and lightnings, and the mountain was encircled with fire; and how when Moses returned from the mountain, bringing the Law, his face shone with a glory so dazzling that the people could not look upon his face and he was obliged to veil it.

49. Turning their glory against them, Paul says: “Truly, we do not deny the glory; splendor and majesty were there: but what does such glory do but compel souls to flee before God, and drive into death and hell? We believers, however, boast another glory, — that of our ministration. The Gospel record tells us ( Matthew 17:2-4) that Christ clearly revealed such glory to his disciples when his face shone as the sun, and Moses and Elijah were present. Before the manifestation of such glory, the disciples did not flee; they beheld with amazed joy and said: “Lord, it is good for us to be here. We will make here tabernacles for thee and for Moses,” etc.

50. Compare the two scenes and you will understand plainly the import of Paul’s words here. As before said, this is the substance of his meaning: “The Law produces naught but terror and death when it dazzles the heart with its glory and stands revealed in its true nature. On the other hand, the Gospel yields comfort and joy.” But to explain in detail the signification of the veiled face of Moses, and of his shining uncovered face, would take too long to enter upon here.

51. There is also especial comfort to be derived from Paul’s assertion that the “ministration,” or doctrine, of the Law “passeth away”; for otherwise there would be naught but eternal condemnation. The doctrine of the Law “passes away” when the preaching of the Gospel of Christ finds place. To Christ, Moses shall yield, that he alone may hold sway. Moses shall not terrify the conscience of the believer. When, perceiving the glory of Moses, the conscience trembles and despairs before God’s wrath, then it is time for Christ’s glory to shine with its gracious, comforting light into the heart.

Then can the heart endure Moses and Elijah. For the glory of the Law, or the unveiled face of Moses, shall shine only until man is humbled and driven to desire the blessed countenance of Christ. If you come to Christ, you shall no longer hear Moses to your fright and terror; you shall hear him as one who remains servant to the Lord Christ, leaving the solace and the joy of his countenance unobscured. In conclusion: “For verily that which hath been made glorious hath not been made glorious in this respect, by reason of the glory that surpasseth.”

52. The meaning here is; When the glory and holiness of Christ, revealed through the preaching of the Gospel, is rightly perceived then the glory of the Law — which is but a feeble and transitory glory — is seen to be not really glorious. It is mere dark clouds in contrast to the light of Christ shining to lead us out of sin, death and hell unto God and eternal life.

The Twelfth Sunday after Trinity, 2016. 2 Corinthians 3:4-11. The Ministration of Righteousness

$
0
0


The Twelfth Sunday after Trinity. 2016


Pastor Gregory L. Jackson




The Hymn #649
                             Jesus Savior Pilot Me
The Confession of Sins
The Absolution
The Introit p. 16
The Gloria Patri
The Kyrie p. 17
The Gloria in Excelsis
The Salutation and Collect p. 19
The Epistle and Gradual       
The Gospel              
Glory be to Thee, O Lord!
Praise be to Thee, O Christ!
The Nicene Creed             p. 22
The Sermon Hymn #123                       Our God Our Help             

The Greater Ministry of the Gospel


The Communion Hymn #304               An Awful Mystery             
The Preface p. 24
The Sanctus p. 26
The Lord's Prayer p. 27
The Words of Institution
The Agnus Dei p. 28
The Nunc Dimittis p. 29
The Benediction p. 31
The Hymn #657             Beautiful Savior                               

KJV 2 Corinthians 3:4 And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward: 5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; 6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. 7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth. 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.

KJV Mark 7:31 And again, departing from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, he came unto the sea of Galilee, through the midst of the coasts of Decapolis. 32 And they bring unto him one that was deaf, and had an impediment in his speech; and they beseech him to put his hand upon him. 33 And he took him aside from the multitude, and put his fingers into his ears, and he spit, and touched his tongue; 34 And looking up to heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him, Ephphatha, that is, Be opened. 35 And straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his tongue was loosed, and he spake plain. 36 And he charged them that they should tell no man: but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it; 37 And were beyond measure astonished, saying, He hath done all things well: he maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak.

Twelfth Sunday After Trinity

Almighty and everlasting God, who hast created all things: We thank Thee that Thou hast given us sound bodies, and hast graciously preserved our tongues and other members from the power of the adversary: We beseech Thee, grant us Thy grace, that we may rightly use our ears and tongues; help us to hear Thy word diligently and devoutly, and with our tongues so to praise and magnify Thy grace, that no one shall be offended by our words, but that all may be edified thereby, through Thy beloved Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with Thee and the Holy Ghost, one true God, world without end. Amen.



The Greater Ministry of the Spirit 
KJV 2 Corinthians 3:4 And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward: 5 Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; 

As Luther says, Paul's writing is quite strange to the uninitiated, such as beginning Christians, but especially to unbelievers. That is why scoffers mock Paul and make fun of him for all his apparent faults, that is, faults apparent to the scoffers. In an age where most cultures considered women as property, Paul taught quite the opposite. He also elevated the position of the slave and gently encouraged Philemon to free his slave. But what are the facts to scoffers? 

The first to criticize Luther are the Lutherans, such as Jar Jar Webber's famous rant, which made me ask, "Have you read Luther?" He answered, "No, I should." But that is not good for advancement in Lutherdom. Wait for all the American synods to mark the 500th Anniversary by posting their latest efforts against Luther and holding special fund-raisers to "honor Luther and the Reformation." They may find themselves hung up on the barbed wire of those who know better and address those errors of the leaders.

Paul is address the conflict with the false apostles who brag about their works and try to enslave the Corinthians in their newly discovered dogmas. Any teaching against Justification by Faith is necessarily Justification by Works, Justification by the Law, as anyone can see among the Leftists in ELCA and the Pietists in the LCMS-ELS-WELS.

Paul has a special office, one which only a few had - apostle. He saw and heard and was taught by the Risen Lord. Like the original and larger group (500) that saw and heard Jesus, nothing could take away Paul's certainty in the Gospel message. The Apostolic Age had a clearly defined group of teachers versus those who pretended to improve upon and clarify what Jesus taught, sending themselves as all false teachers do, living off of what others had done before. Not one drop of martyr's veins is ever found in the false teachers. They run at the sound of dry leaves blowing and hide away from their imagined dangers.

The false teachers glories in themselves, but Paul gloried in the Gospel converting the Corinthians and bearing spiritual fruit in them. He did not need hand-written letters from or to the congregation. Their believing souls were his living epistles, engraved with the Gospel in their hearts.

Therefore, Paul's confidence was in God, but he is not bragging about a virtue he has developed in himself. His sufficiency is from God. Everything he does is from the power of the Spirit in the Word - that is entirely how God accomplishes His work.

6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

This letter is a play on words, about writing. The Law was engraved on stone tablets, which is contrasted with the Gospel taught by the Spirit. The Law by itself kills, because no one stands forgiven and saved by the Law. No one can properly observe even one Commandment, let alone all Ten Commandments.

False teachers always engage in some form of the Law, even when they say the Law is obsolete, like the Antinomians. Those people, who hold onto UOJ like drowning men, say that with universal forgiveness, everything in the past, present, and future is already forgiven - ergo, no Law. Some offer superficial confession of sin only to boast they are already forgiven and saved.

Are they all grace? Hardly. These Anti-Law people are nothing but man-made requirements (theirs) and commands to infinity and beyond. If anyone transgresses their unwritten canon law, they are condemned and sentenced to shunning and exile, utter silence as befits those who have violated one tiny bit of their code.

The Spirit gives life. This is an unusual comparison because the stone tablets are such a well known figure that they are used all the time. And we have many of them today in various forms - monuments and places of honor - built to last forever.

But the Gospel is written on our hearts as promised in the Old Testament. This Gospel gives life because the Promises are forgiveness, blessings, and comfort. These first Epistles of Paul, written on leather or copied onto papyrus, were quite fragile in themselves, but the Gospel itself was written on the hearts of those first believers, and that could not be removed by false teachers and their boasting.

As Paul reminded the Thessalonians, they knew and experienced the power of the Gospel Word. Anything else weighs down people with demands and works to be done to satisfy justice. But the Gospel teaches us that Jesus has satisfied the righteousness of God. We are justified by the faith of Jesus (three times stated in the New Testament), who placed Himself in the hands of God and paid for our sins, rising from the dead.

Paul always backs away from anything hinting at making a decision, as he does in this lesson, because that would place part of salvation on man as responsible for making a correct decision. The Law salesmen demand a decision in favor of their return to slavery. To enforce it, they exile anyone who questions this.

The Gospel itself converts, whether in tiny babies or adults, because of the power of the Word. It is not  - Jesus has done it all and now you must do this - but the Gospel revealing this truth to us and opening our hearts to receive it with joy, as the Election article teaches in the Formula of Concord.



29] And this call of God, which is made through the preaching of the Word, we should not regard as jugglery, but know that thereby God reveals His will, that in those whom He thus calls He will work through the Word, that they may be enlightened, converted, and saved. For the Word, whereby we are called, is a ministration of the Spirit, that gives the Spirit, or whereby the Spirit is given, 2 Cor. 3:8, and a power of God unto salvation, Rom. 1:16. And since the Holy Ghost wishes to be efficacious through the Word, and to strengthen and give power and ability, it is God's will that we should receive the Word, believe and obey it.

7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 

From the lesser to the greater - that is a common comparison used then and still in our times. Swedes thought Lindsborg Kansas was the great destination, the City on a Hill. When they landed in New York City, they said, "If this is NYC, what must Lindsborg be like?"

Paul never denigrates the Law by itself. Nor does Luther, who pointed out that God gave us the Law with Promises. And the Law is an essential revelation of God's will, what He commands for our good. Our country's Founders realized this and all criminal and civil law was based on the Ten Commandments.  But as great and glorious as the Law is, the Gospel is far greater.

9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth. 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.

The Law is so embeded in us that students ask, in a sense, "What is the minimum that I must do in order to fulfill the assignment's requirement?" And they often say something like this, "You did not mark my assignment that much and I did what was required, so I deserve an A." One even said, ignoring what I said previously in the clearest way, "Why only a 95%? I should get 100%." He earned an A but he was not happy with only an A. He wanted a gold leaf cluster under it, though he ignored my suggestion for improvements.

On the other hand, some start with the attitude of doing their best because want to, and that is the ideal. How much more can I do so I learn even more? Thanks for the corrections - I will apply them to the next effort. Even - thank you for teaching me about plagiarism and cheating. You are the best teacher I ever had.

The entire difference between Law and Gospel is - have to, or want to. Those who live under the Law "have to." The thoughts direct their words and actions. Those who live under the Gospel "want to." There is no getting even in the Gospel. Out of God's abundant mercy and generosity flows the fruits of that Spirit in our lives. 

This is our guide to sound doctrine and the true glory of the Gospel. If someone wants to enslave people with their new and better version of the Bible, then they are Law salesmen. If they specialize in "must" and "have to" and "now do your part," they are simply appealing to man's logic rather than God's will. It is not a contract where God does His part and we do our part - it is the Gospel of Grace that plants faith in our hearts by the Spirit in the Word.

So I tested the Mormon missionaries by saying, "We are justified by faith, not by works." They said, "Not by works?" That was the hook that trapped them, more than their odd dogma about Jesus being the brother of Satan. The Chief Article cannot be amended or improved. If someone is against the Chief Article, he is against the Gospel. All the other errors flow from it. If he changes the Chief Article, which he cannot do, because it belongs to God alone, he condemns himself as a messenger of Satan, a liar, a peculator, and a murderer of souls.

He may call himself a Mormon, a Catholic, or a Lutheran. If he opposes or amends the Chief Article, he is against God's Word.


Rain Predictions Disappoint - Rescue Plants. Creation, Acid Soil, Sweet Soil. Good and Bad Aromas

$
0
0
Blueberry flowers are beautiful and delicate,
like the berries themselves.
Those who grow them will attract birds and squirrels.
So far I have eaten one blueberry in two years of growing them.
They are more productive in acid soil, so I mulch them with pine needles
and pine cones.

Springdale has perfected the feel of going to rain and yet not raining. Even the weather services are fooled. Last night, after threatening rain all day, Accuweather had us down for storms at 1 AM and 4 AM, but the pavement is strangely dry again.

I watered front and  backyards yesterday, often a guarantee of rain. The last time I did that, I had to run out in the rain to turn off the water spigot.

Nevertheless, I had fun with rescue plants. One is a young willow that was knocked down and almost uprooted, either by Sassy, another animal, or wind. It looked dried up, but some green was still showing in two places on the plant. I snipped away the dead plant material, anchored the plant with small logs, and watered it several times with rainwater.

Optimism about rescues came from recent efforts with rainwater. I watered Barbara Streisand into blooming with rainwater. I also brought Mr. Lincoln into better production by favoring it with stored rain.

Chaste Tree smells like medicine,
like many herbs.


The Chaste Tree was my rescue based on studying the plant. My instincts were to use rainwater on it when it drooped, but that made the sad look even more prominent. I finally looked up How To Raise Chaste Trees and discovered out three rules:

  1. Never water a Chaste Tree.
  2. Feel free to prune it however the gardener wishes.
  3. Grow the plant in the sunlight.
As I wrote earlier, I dug up the small bush from its shady spot and placed it in a shallow hole I dug. I placed the Chaste Tree in the sun, near the blueberries, in a place we could enjoy it. Unlike all previous plantings, I did not water it. Instead I pruned every branch to encourage root growth and mulched the area around it. Now the plant is leafed out everywhere and certainly taking root in its sunny, dry spot.

The Creating Word has fashioned plants and insects for every climate, so we can do well if we study the favorite locations and climates of the plant and animal kingdoms. Potential gardeners are shocked by the truth about plants, that some thrive in the cold and rain, even under snow. Others favor the burning sun. Still others, especially herbs, would rather be in poor soil, where they thrive and produce.



The dominant plants will diagnose the soil for the discerning gardener. They want acid soil, favor slight acidity (like roses), or want sweet soil (peas). Eventually the gardener has a mental database of what should go where in the garden. Do I mulch with pine (acid soil)? or dump the charcoal and fireplace ashes here (sweet, which is really base soil). Caltrate makes the soil sweeter, and earthworms have their own, unique Caltrate or calciferous glands.

Let us pause a moment to consider the work of earthworms. They are created and engineered to gather the elements of calcium carbonate and manufacture the chemical for the soil. They are the only animal to do this, but then, earthworms are almost everywhere. This effect is so powerful that rogue earthworms, set free by fisherman and other scoundrels who visit pine forests, convert the soil slowly into deciduous tree areas. This slow conversion is cause for alarm when people want evergreens to stay and perpetuate the habitat.



Longfellow - Evangeline
This is the forest primeval. The murmuring pines and the hemlocks,
Bearded with moss, and in garments green, indistinct in the twilight,
Stand like Druids of old, with voices sad and prophetic,
Stand like harpers hoar, with beards that rest on their bosoms.
Loud from its rocky caverns, the deep-voiced neighboring ocean
Speaks, and in accents disconsolate answers the wail of the forest.
Wiki:
On August 27, 1829, Longfellow wrote to the president of Bowdoin that he was turning down the professorship because he considered the $600 salary "disproportionate to the duties required". The trustees raised his salary to $800 with an additional $100 to serve as the college's librarian, a post which required one hour of work per day.[27]


Sweet Soil - Less Acid
The conversion of acid soil spells doom for some plants and gives life to others. Sweet soil is a bit confusing, because the soil is not more sugary, but more base/less acidic. Of course, an acid soil does not dissolve plants. Acid soil is on the other side of neutral, just as sweet soil is the opposite on the other side of neutral.

Sweet soil is unlocks more chemicals for the plant roots to use, and clay soil has the most to use, plus the fine particles that provide more charges for ion exchange. I do not know much about chemistry, but I can pretend a bit by reading the basics. I thought chemistry was "loud boiling test-tubes" - like my Gilbert Chemistry Set - not black and white diagrams of compounds. My chemistry instructor and I were mutually disappointed. 

So this one creature, scorned or ignored by most, is the key to soil chemistry and fertility. And there is not just one earthworm, but many earthworm varieties, suited for their locations in various parts of the earth. One theory about the abundance of America is the transfer of hard-working European earthworms to the vast potential of our soil. Voisin's classic Better Grassland Sward, used for only $70, explains his theory. He also wrote, The Cow and Her Grass. You laugh, but you drink milk and enjoy ice cream. The delicate balance of nutrition in a herd of cows will make or break a dairy farm.

One act of God's providence is linked to another. The vast herds of buffaloes on the Great Plains created up to 20 feet of top soil, because the deep-rooted prairie grass fed and was fed by these herds and other creatures. When the European earthworms arrived, the prairie soil was unlocked for all time and became the most productive place on earth for food, the breadbasket of the world.

Slime molds clean up other fungi -
and they often look like plastic dog vomit.


Smells, Aromas, and Stinks
Our sense of smell is nothing compared to cats and dogs, but we easily discern the stink of decomposition, the strange smells of fungus and bacteria. The creatures of rot are attracted to those aromas and gradually sanitize them so that nothing is left but the pleasant smell of soil (coming from one distinct soil bacterium).

If not aromas, then other factors attract beneficial creatures. Sometimes chemicals are released by stressed plants to alert the beneficial insects. I understand that the sound of munching will also bring some.

"What's that?"
"Our favorite food is crunching on some flowers. Let's eat those monsters."

The shape of flowers will bring hummingbirds and the sweet fragrance of some will bring butterflies. But these creatures specialize too. Butterflies need specific plants to raise their young. The most obvious is the Monarch, needing Milkweed or Butterfly Weed.

Butterfly Bush smells like grape jelly -
no wonder the insects and butterflies love it.


John 1:3
These are only a few of the relationships between plants and soil, plants and creatures, plants and aromas. Soil chemistry really begins with microbes - fungi, bacteria, protozoa - another layer of complexity and mutual dependence.

Every layer is complex and mutually balanced by the actions of other players in the design and engineering of Creation. Expert management is proven by the way soil fertility asserts itself again, over time, once man has finished his own adjustments. Weeds will conquer weed barriers. Plants will overcome the toxic effects of man-made chemicals. Soil microbes will return to do their work - all without the knowledge or permission of man, the pinnacle of God's Creation.

Norma Boeckler's butterfly notecard.

Take Luther With You - Especially Galatians

$
0
0

The Galatians Lectures can be found in the shorter form or the longer, final effort of Luther to keep people straight on Justification by Faith.

The two best productions by Luther are Galatians and his Small Catechism. Luther offered that assessment, and most would agree. No doubt that can be found in most seminarians' notes - "L. best, Gal and small cat." But no one reads them. Even fewer study them, especially Galatians. The genius editors of the Formula and Book of Concord, 1580, commended Luther's Galatians for additional study of Justification by Faith.

Jar Jar Webber condescended to mention Galatians but revealed no insights from the book he ignored so ungraciously. Why not? Galatians repudiates every word of the Emmaus Dreck already enshrined in the precious WELS Essay File. I nominate Webber for a professorship at Mequon - they so richly deserve God's wrath for their promotion of false doctrine.

Me? No, that was a long time ago.
The number may be up to several dozen by now.

We make stops where I have to wait for a period of time, from very short to hours, depending. I often take Luther's Sermons with me or Galatians.  I can open Galatians to Galatians 3 and be knocked over by Luther's insights in one paragraph.

He observed that teacher of the Bible can take a flower and plant a meadow with it. One concept can be compared and multiplied by many other texts and insights from personal experience. But Luther has taken the Apostle's meadow and built landmass of flowers with it.

There are many opportunities to pick up Luther and read a paragraph. Throw away the synodical drivel and read the Reformer for a year. That is a bit dangerous. The Word brings with it many blessings and plenty of crosses.

The blistered and injured athlete will say the Olympic gold was worth the sacrifices, and the one who reads Luther will eventually realize what the Reformer meant by "the blessed and holy cross" one must bear in teaching the truth.

Luther is available in many convenient forms:

  1. Printed works are often very inexpensive - used ones are hardly worn at all. WELS copies will crack when opened.
  2. E-books are handy for all computers and digital devices.
  3. The Lenker Luther sermons are published on this blog - see the top - and featured every Sunday for the Church Year.
  4. Fortress Press'Day by Day We Magnify Thee is a good devotional book built around Luther's insights, verbatim.



Once a reader is used to Luther, he will notice that the Reformer had many caustic remarks for false teachers.

The more delicate Lutheran leaders of today are slugs in public, spineless and slow, but they are full of venom for anyone who questions their precious infallible sect. Hold your breath after making an observation. You will not pass out waiting for them to say, "Eighth Command!" or "Matthew 18!" or "Slander!"

ELDONUTs are full of themselves, as their own graphic shows.

Moline Classmate Had His Business Burn Down When a Fire from the Other Side Rekindled - Firemen Went Home

ELDONUT Song

$
0
0
Deacon Anthony Oncken

ELDONA, less than one square mile
Where mullets are in style, year-round.
Oh, church bandit, you sure planned it,
Wherever you're going, I'll goose-step your way.
sung to the tune of Moon River





At the last ELDONA meeting, a Vespers service was announced, but it was only for the pasteurized, homogenized ELDONA priests and bishop. No layman was allowed to attend. A postulant could not attend either. Nor could an applicant for their seminary.

When laity found out they were barred from worship, they looked around at each other.

What would St. Ignatius say?

"What's wrong with a mullet?"


St. Ignatius ELDONA Seminary, Malone, Texas.
Oncken is in charge of the entire student body - one person.
The Live Bait sign was ordered but was not yet here for the photo-shoot.

Birds and Squirrels - New Show Every Hour, Every Day

$
0
0
Norma Boeckler's Bluebird

I set up some bird baths and feeders a distance away from the bedroom window, then moved everything in.

A White Profusion Butterfly Bush has grown at least 8 feet tall and serves as a waiting room for birds, stairs and escape for squirrels. Next to the bush is a large Pokeweed, which is ready to bear fruit for the birds. Together they screen and shade the window.

Below is a children's swimming pool kept clean and full of water for all animals. I cut the sides down to make it easier for all creatures to use. Also, birds are intimidated by deep water but love to bathe in shallow pools. I tried using rocks and deeper water, but that increased the surface area to clean of algae and dirt.

Four bird feeders, sheltered by the eaves, close to the window, keep the area busy:

  1. The platform feeder is perforated and filled with sunflower seeds each day.
  2. The hanging baskets are filled with suet during the cooler seasons, not in summer when they melt away.
  3. The squirrel-proof (sic) feeder has finch seed, so only the finch family and sparrows feed from it.
  4. The Lowe's hanging feeder holds a lot of sunflower seeds and its multi-sided design allows five birds to eat at once.

I let Sassy in from the backyard, and there on the Yellow Coneflower was a Goldfinch eating the seeds formed by the flower. The bird was unfazed by our activity, so I went back to watch more feeding. He finished with one flower, looked up, and hopped onto the next. I hope he plants a few seeds in my yard. I bought that plant for beneficial insects and got a bonus.

This Bella Vista super-squirrel owned my squirrel-proof (sic) feeder,
using the mechanism to shake seed into his greedy mouth.


The Daily Bird and Squirrel Show
Naturally, the birds were shy about the new contraptions when the feeders were set up near our window. The Jackson EZ Bird-Swing also had almost no activity.

Now we have a show every day, almost all day. The juvenile squirrels love to squat on the platform and bat away birds that threaten them. Meanwhile birds line up on the Butterfly Bush and hop over to the finch feeder or the hanging sunflower feeder.

Sometimes I open and shut the sliding glass window to get the squirrels away, But they know that opening the window is no threat. They just flinch and keep eating. Popping it shut later can turn two squirrels into flying squirrels in a second. Even then, they prepare to come back in quickly. 

I love to see a baby squirrel twitching and sniffing as he comes up to the window, after crawling up the side of the house. The tail moves back and forth in little darting motions, to show he is ready to eat but also ready to flee.

Believe it or not, the squirrels do not eat all the platform food. When that feeder is clear, Mourning Doves will sit and sift through the seeds to find some for themselves. Sometimes they land close to menace the squirrels away. That makes the squirrel reach out to warn the bird away. 

Dove fluttering - "Away! Away!"
Squirrel - "I will push you out of the air with my paw!"

Cardinals are the shyest birds, so I love seeing Mr. and Mrs. Cardinal eating sunflower seed from the hanging feeder each day. Lately I learned they also love Crepe Myrtle seeds, so I am letting most of the flowers go to seed for them. That also explains why they nest in the Crepe Myrtle. It is like sleeping in the linens department of a Walmart Supercenter. Hungry? Dinner's a few inches away.

Unlike many bird-lovers, I enjoy having flocks of Starlings - and their cousins, the Grackles - in my yard. As relatives to the Crows, they flock together, eat like teenagers, and remove tons of pests, including grubs like Japanese Beetles

Many Plants and Bushes Can Replace Acres of Yawn-Lawn
As I learned from the Coneflower, one plant by itself can appeal to beneficial insects and beautiful birds. Each creature of God has its own time to flourish and set up for the next year, by forming a brood locally or - for some birds - heading South.

In the Upper Peninsula, the poor people go to Minnesota for the winter.

Grass makes a convenient pathway between gardens, where everything contributes to a vibrant yard filled with birds and insects.

The Elderberry plants I began - for the first time, from Almost Eden - are now bowed down with black berries. They attracted insects at first and served as base for a lot of beneficial activity. Now they will feed birds into the cold season.

Beautyberries are edible only for birds, and they form very late. They are the berries useful late in the year, when everything else has stopped fruiting. Right now I only see flowers on the Beautyberries.



Leave It Trashy Until Early Spring
Gardeners want to mow everything down and clean up the yard for winter - wrong! The dead plants are havens for beneficial insects and wild bees. A dead stalk is a cozy chamber for insects, which are 99% beneficial.  Flowers gone to seed are bird-food - and that includes weed seeds. How else have some weeds spread so well?

God mulches all his plants, so we should too. I look at leaves as something to add to the yard, not as trash to haul away. I used 60 bags of leaves from my hard-working neighbors last year, and where are they? Some are carpeting the Wild Garden, but most have rotted into the soil, converted by earthworms and mites, slugs and other creatures.

If insects like the tiny flowers,
Hummingbirds are likely to enjoy them too.

Feedings, Inspections, Weedings and Blessings

$
0
0

Sassy and I are usually up before dawn, so she waits for some sunlight to take our walk. Today the sun was up already. Sassy ate her Science Diet breakfast while I got dressed for the walk. She walked toward the Four Esses, where every daughter's name starts with an S, but she veered when the Army Ranger called out. "Get over here, you three-legged dawg."

Sassy's favorites are greeted by a howl of pleasure - "Ah-roo-roo-roo." The Ranger and I had a long talk about politics and crime while Sassy got petted and combed by my fingers. When she was ready to walk, she barked sharply. "Have you got an appointment?"

"Bark! Bark!" People laugh about our dialogues, but we communicate all day long. She stops on our walk, hanging back so I can play "Go. Go." with her. She will be 50 feet back and bark sharply. I yell "Go go go go!" as she races toward me, like the days when she was running toward me in the park. I reach toward her and she dodges me each time.

If I miss the implication of her sounds and body language, she lets me know. The other night I thought she was ready for sleep at the end of our bed. She sat up, after having lidded eyes and that drowsy look. "Aroo. Bark! Bark!"

She wanted good-night petting from both of us. She wants to be invited, so I clap my hands softly and say, "Move, move." She comes up and sits for some petting from both of us, with exclamations of how gentle and loving she is. We enjoy that session almost every night, but we have to invite her.

If I miss all hints I suddenly find a dog's head under my hand, with a big Sassy grin looking up at me. "Time for night-night?" She will stand up and fall over for both of us to pet her.

That is the hanging feeder - not my photo.
My squirrels are much livelier.


Feeding Time for the Birds Squirrels
The normal quota for the bird feeders is - one big cup of sunflower seeds for the platform feeder and four cups for the hanging feeder.

Today I had a young squirrel on the platform and another one using the hanging feeder as his vending machine. Squirrels know to spin the six-sided feeder to bring the loose seeds closer. I closed the window sharply to reset the feeders.

Birds and squirrels fly, but still remain close to the food. The Butterfly Bush is strong enough for both. Now seven birds are on the platform and one squirrel is spinning the hanging feeder for breakfast.



Spiders Casting Their Nets on Privet Hedges
Two neighbors behind us on Joye Street do landscaping work and have boxy privet hedges on the front of their property. They keep them trimmed neatly.

Almost every morning the spider webs on top of the hedges are highlighted by dew. What a bountiful zone for spiders. They can snag the insects landing on top and the bugs crawling up from the branches. Bushes are feeding zones for spiders, nesting places for birds, and havens for insects.

The webs are irregular circles, never touching, leaving a margin around each feeding site. Web spiders are created and engineered to cast a net wherever food is likely to appear.

Spiders without webs (cursorial) march across the property to hunt for food. Spiders alone number in the thousands in a field, so one can only guess how much damage they do to pests.

God manages all the beneficials so they have their own territory and favorite foods, including themselves. Almost every beneficial will devour its own, but that protests the gene pool to favor the strongest.
At first we earthwormed the yard,
mulched and pruned the Crepe Myrtle.
The Crepe Myrtle was newly trimmed in this photo.
Now the bush and yard are even more bloom covered.

Honoring Creation
Not using toxins is one way to trust in God's Creation, engineering, and continuous management.

The plants and animals carry out their duties according to a calendar and plan we do not comprehend or implement. I know the Crepe Myrtle bush enjoys plenty of sun and food for its roots, so I have another pyramid of food under the bush, an explosion of color people point to as an example of they want to grow.

The food supply is comprised of cow manure, shredded wood, the blooms I cut off to encourage more growth, twigs cut to spur growth, pieces of rotten wood, and pieces of lawnmower manure. The large powered lawnmowers build up clumps of dust and grass, which fall off from time to time. Some are scraped off. They are pure energy held together by fine dust. This larder is almost free and always settling down.

What happens?

The soil creatures, mold, and fungus work on the more complex ingredients of bark and mulch, and share it with the roots below. Spiders set up shops to process fresh insects, the hollows and dampness ideal to attract their food. Bees manage the flowers to provide seed for the Cardinals nesting above.
Bacteria devour the simpler foods, like grass, below. Earthworms and slugs shred bigger pieces, and bacteria in the earthworm gut carries out digestion for the earthworm. Since bushes attract insects, the Cardinals also have fresh meals for their young. Additional flying patrols are carried out by beneficial insects like wasps, tiny Flower Flies, Tachenid Flies, and Ichneumon Wasps. Although I knew only a portion of this last year, the creatures did their work anyway.

If anyone has ever worked on a church building project, it is well known that the project will take at least two years to complete from start to finish. Many details have to be managed, so one error can spoil the results. And yet, this little spot of Creation can exist and flourish with only a little help from us, if we only appreciate what God has created, engineered to perfection, and managed so well.

Fluffy pink fireworks of flowers
hide the Cardinal nest within.
Note the layer of branches and mulch
on top of composted cow manure.


Inspecting the Yards
Once again I am Hamlet debating - "To water or not to water, that is the question."

Some genuine rain is promised for tomorrow, and I soaked everything already for the recent faux-rain. The KnockOut roses look splendid because we pruned them back by 50% at first droop, and they received some serious rain right after. Our helper and I clipped off the spent KO blooms, so now they are all fresh and bright and reaching their former height.

Roses droop in dry and hot weather, so pruning and soaks give them energy. I have no qualms about sprinkling and hosing them down, to remove the dust and sweat from their toil. OK - just the just. Rose canes are spongy rather than woody, so they soak up the water fast and loose it fast on hot, sunny, windy days. The spongy canes green up fast too.

Veterans Honor - give the rosebush,
share the blooms.

Falling in Love roses donated generously and now rest for the next cycle. They will be a very special next year, with the roots established all winter. I expect some good rains will yield another crop of these roses.

Easy Does It orange roses produce strong stems and clusters of roses. Its color production says "Look at me" all the time.

Mr. Lincoln will generate the longest, strongest, and most fragrant roses before any other hybrid tea. If someone wants to grow impressive roses for the vase or yard, Mr. Lincoln is an easy choice. Our friend loves to see her Mr. Lincoln bud open up and slowly turn purple.

Veterans Honor is the  other red rose bloom in mug-like form, fat rather than tall in shape, its red color so pure that the blooms glow in low light and stand out among all other roses in the garden. Veterans Honor also earns high praise for its longevity in a vase.

In the backyard I found two roses with non-rose leaves. I looked again. Growing from the middle was probably a nut tree, planted by the squirrels - watered and mulched by me.

The ground is so fertile that nuisance trees and bushes erupt from the ground, so I am always doing some weeding and yanking out growth.

Mr. Lincoln buds are tall, very fragrant,
and open up to large blooms.

Question on Adult Education Classes

$
0
0

One reader asked about what I use for adult education. Luther preached for an hour at a time and advised pastors, "If you cannot preach that long, preach 30 minutes." Now the standard is 10 minutes of fluff copied from the Net." Therefore, Luther combined preaching the Gospel with doctrinal and Biblical lessons.

No wonder the modern Lutherans are copying from Captain Billy's Whiz Bang - or the equivalent thereof. Many Lutheran pastors cannot define their own doctrine, apart from memorized and confused bits from the talking points in Dog Class.

First of all, I feature one or more Luther's sermons for the Sunday in the historic lectionary year - no papal readings for us. I publish those weekly on Facebook and this blog.

Secondly, I quote from that Luther sermon during my sermon. I have used Lenski a lot and will use Lenski more in the future.

The adult class is either going through a book of the Bible, verse by verse, or a section of the Book of Concord.

Here are three books others have used for adult classes or confirmation:

Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant

Liberalism: Its Cause and Cure

Jesus, Priceless, Treasure - An Introduction to the Christian Faith

Soon all three will be on Amazon and Kindle.



Reviewing CN 8-22-2016. Otten Praises the False Teacher Reuel Schultz, RIP, WELS Church Growth Enthusiast. Want the Same Treatment from Otten? Attend Fuller Seminary!

$
0
0


"For several years I've been a Pete Wagner fan. Although I don't see eye to eye with him on many important theological points (he approves of faith healing and speaking in tongues as long as it promotes church growth and he comes from a Billy Graham decision for conversion doctrinal background), he is the most eloquent spokesman of the Church Growth Movement. A prolific author on mission/evangelism/church growth subjects, Wagner is also an excellent teacher and a crystal clear writer." 
Pastor Reuel J. Schulz The Evangelism Life Line (WELS) Winter, 1980.

"The publication TELL ('The Evangelism Life Line') has been inaugurated to promote the cause of church growth." Ernst H. Wendland, "Church Growth Theology," Wisconsin Lutheran Quarterly, April, 1981, 78, p. 105.


Schulz was famous for his Fuller Seminary, Church Growth Enthusiasm.
Otten:
The first eleven pages of this issue contain some of the many writings of one of the WELS’ finest pastors and writers. Read what Pastor Reuel Schulz wrote and judge for yourself. Northwestern should now publish “A Pastor’s Role Model” with the writings of Reuel Schulz. Right now CN is working on a book titled “Back to the Bible, Luther, and ‘Old Missouri’ – The Writings of Raymond Surburg.” Northwestern has far more help and resources than CN to publish the writings of Reuel Schulz. In an age when far too many computer literate pastors spend little time visiting both members and the unchurched it would be helpful for them to read what the brilliant, courageous, well informed, bold and humorous Reuel Schulz has written.

The Wit and Wisdom of Fuller UOJ Pastors - 
One of Reuel Schulz’s humorous comments on p. 3 mentions the “GJ Church.” CN’s review of Thy Strong Word by Gregory Jackson, Ph.D., who at one time was considered the WELS’s whiz kid, is still on the growing pile of material prepared to publish for which CN has not yet had space. Finances prohibit adding more pages. Hopefully it will appear next week. Jackson writes: “We now belong to the largest synod of all, the 5,000,000 people who are Lutherans but refuse to attend the synodical franchise congregations. Some of us have started independent congregations” (ii). “Do the LCMS, WELS, ELS, and CLC leaders ever imagine that their jealousy, spite, envy, and peevishness have driven the synod into the ground?” (477). “Christian News has been a spectacular failure” (509). “Once Ylvisaker and the Preus brothers were gone, the ELS had no intellectual leadership” (510).

And here is the bon mot from WELS Pastor Schulz, apparently from 2000 -

“Thanks for printing all my articles about our mission in Grenada. So nice of you: “Best regards and God bless you, RJS “P.S. Have you heard about the new church in Arizona, the GJ Church, with one member who has a tough time getting along with himself. G for either God or Greg. J for either Jesus or Jackson."

***

GJ - If Schulz had spent some time checking out his facts, he would not have made a fool of himself in print. Church Growth dogma has dominated WELS for a long time. But why would Otten exhume this typical WELS misfire as an example of wit?

Our congregation has pioneered streaming video for live and saved worship services, which are viewed around the world. So far we have 14,500 views. The sermons are recorded live and also published via this blog - with a Luther sermon each week.

This blog has 4.8 million total views, with the highest number going to a Luther quote - the object of Ichabod - to promote Luther's doctrine.

Herman Otten does not like to reminded of his ecumenical twists, his need to have SP candidates fawn over him until they are safely in office, at which point he says his latest Sycophant President "must go."




I would much rather read about Harrison singing "The Ballad of Herman Otten"before being elected the first time - not much later, after being enthroned in his office with a princely salary.

I would love to see Herman Otten finally teach the Chief Article of the Christian Faith rather than the dogma of Halle University, Universal Objective Justification.

Otten the politician has the same faults as the Synod Presidents he promotes and then disdains. He has no grasp of Lutheran doctrine, promotes Church Growth, and tries to silence anyone who disagrees.



Review
Here is a brief review of crimes covered up in Christian News by not reporting them or - at best - burying them on page 17 (Hochmuth).











Rain Promised in One Hour - Holy Moleys

$
0
0

Last night Mr. Gardener was watering his lawn and bushes, and I was watering the roses. I have used his lawn mowing as 100% proof of rain in the near future. He finished mowing his property, front and back. It has to rain now.

We talked about the Crepe Myrtle bush he wanted to plant. I pointed to Almost Eden to our right. The nursery infrastructure is easy to see from our yards. When I saw the new structures going up, I knew we had a business starting in the old dairy farm. In Bella Vista we used to shop at a mini-mall that was also a former dairy farm. I like this conversion better.

We walk across a mown field of grass to reach the plants. Sassy considers a walk through Almost Eden a regular duty. She can track cats, dogs, rabbits, and anything else - as I look at plants. We often find Almost Eden watering many of the plants while his dog Opie waits.

We share the same perspective on plants - no toxins. Almost Eden has an abundance of insect and bird life as a result.

Mr. Gardener is going to shop there for Crepe Myrtles. They might be called Southern Lilacs. I have seen many varieties of Crepe Myrtle in this area - pink, raspberry, and purple blooms. Their popularity comes from a long blooming time (months) and tolerance of hot, dry weather. Unlike Chaste Tree, which hates watering, Crepe Myrtle responds well to watering and also enjoys a heavily mulched base.

Plants Are Self-Mulching
Mulching is a generic term for placing a layer of organic material around the base of a plant:

  • Newspaper
  • Cardboard
  • Grass
  • Compost
  • Manure
  • Flowers
  • Leaves.
When I was a beginning gardener, I raked leaves out from under bushes, so they could have bare soil around them. Most bushes promptly dropped more leaves to mulch themselves.

God mulches every plant, much more than people imagine. Leaves, pollen, flowers, and dead insects fall off each plant to add organic matter to the top of the soil. That layer of organic matter keeps the soil cool and moist while feeder the very creatures we want to tend the roots - bacteria, fungi, protozoa, earthworms, and many more. This spring a mole circled the supercenter of food underneath my Crepe Myrtle, the same area that I mulched for the last four years. His digging for food was exactly where I mulched, the first time I have seen a mole dig a food tunnel in a perfect circle. He took days to complete his work. 

 "I love Creation gardeners,
and I frustrate the rest of them.
Goodbye and thanks for all the June-bugs."



Earthworm Enjoyment

Insects are undoubtedly mole nutritive staples, but they're not actually their first priority. Large earthworms are actually what moles generally like to eat the most. Moles consider earthworms to be so valuable they regularly stash them away for later consumption. If they have an earthworm surplus, they tuck them away inside designated safekeeping units. One researcher found a unit consisting of more than 1,200 earthworms. The unit also housed several grubs.

Big Appetites

Moles possess extremely speedy metabolisms. Because of this, it's absolutely crucial for the subterranean mammals to take in substantial portions of food daily. If they don't, they simply can't sustain themselves. Moles generally consume between two and three times their body weights every 24 hours. Moles are unable to survive without eating for 12 hours or so.

Over 500,000 bacteria will fit inside the period
at the end of this sentence, so a mole is this big or bigger in relation
 to soil creature size.


Moles love earthworms, but they also consume pests in the ground before those grubs hatch into big pests. Although the mole doubtlessly wiped out or stored most of those earthworms underneath the bush, plenty more available nearby. Less hysterical gardeners -the ones who welcome moles - also realize these enormous animals (in light of most soil denizens) are the Caterpillar tractors of the yard.

Moles may frustrate you, but June-bugs (Japapese beetles) infuriate me. Moles do no harm, but June-bugs devour the best flowers and do nothing to make up for their vandalism. I suggest gardeners thank the moles for reducing the number of destructive insects developing under the soil.

The most often named villains of the garden - moles, Starlngs, Grackles, Crows - are also the most voracious predators of pests. Likewise, people complain about Dutch white clover, whose only fault is pulling nitrogen out of the air and fixing it for the soil - thanks to bacteria in the roots.

Clover will sit there in the grass, feed the bee population, mulch the soil with its leaves and flowers and pollen - and die off leaving tiny pods of organic nitrogen compounds for the grass roots. And it expands it beneficial network wherever it can find purchase for its benevolent growth.

People would pay big money for Pokeweed
if the birds did not plant it for free.
We tend to denigrate what is free
and chase what is expensive.


Mulch Has To Go Somewhere
Before garbage pick-up trucks, people gathered organic waste of various types and composted them. During morning walks I find green bags of grass - later leaves - that will go to the dump. If I were building compost, I would grab the grass bags and add them to my compost pile. However, they would lead to hauling the finished compost somewhere in the garden, not my idea of fun. And that ignores the chore of picking up a big, moist bag of stinking, rotting grass and dropping it into the Icha-boat.

I will wait for dozens of bags of autumn leaves, carefully and conveniently gathered in the same bags, lightweight, dry, and devoid of that memorable rotting grass stink. 

I also pick up pieces of rotting wood, often very light - wormed out by soil creatures - and freshly dropped deadwood, still weighted by moisture and ready to feed the troops. Both types are valuable to weight down the cardboard layer before the autumn leaves arrive. I also use them to prop new bushes prone to wind or animal damage. Several logs held up a newly transplanted Butterfly Bush that was weaker than a UOJ argument. After several months of rainwater, the bush was flowering and standing on its own.

Meanwhile, the logs and cardboard held in moisture, served as a food zone for insects and birds, and kept us all from walking into the bush and uprooting it. I moved the small logs to the new cardboard, to keep our yard from airmailing the covering during the next wind storm.

The bare cardboard adds a note of Dogpatch to the backyard at the moment, but it will soon be covered with autumn leaves and promoting the growth of Hosta. Meanwhile, the grass is rotting into the soil and increasing the soil creature population.

When I thought of short-cuts, growing up in Moline, my father would say at the bakery, "You are the laziest thing I ever saw." I looked for ways to shorten the time involved since youthful energy was not lacking. I doubled the load. Now I have moved from flours to flowers, and I still search for ways to make it easier and more productive.

Note for the Frugal 
Newspapers, cardboard, grass clippings, and tree offerings are all free and yet packed with potential soil nutrition. Tree stumps are easily harvested from the curb during fall and spring clean-ups. 

Neighbors see tree stumps as trash to be hauled away. I see stumps as free bird perches and soil creature food. If they have little off-shoots, so much the better. 
Make a rustic fence with these on top of the wood mulch.
Stumps make great squirrel and bird perches.
They love to be a little off the ground and look
for food from that position.

Why Bother with Synodical Politicians?

$
0
0

I have a lot of contacts, every day. Most have genuine concerns. A few want to play synodical games with information they will not address on their own. Or they want to trade gossip, their wampum for my gold. No thanks.

I have all the time in the world for doctrinal discussions and insights on recent Lutheran history. Almost all those contacts are laity who are sincerely involved in studying Lutheran doctrine and looking for good authors to study. A few are pastors who find out things before I do or subscribe to periodicals I would not use for mulch.

Christian News has always been a political tabloid, which is what I avoid. If Larry Olson were a Synodical President, I would kiss his feet and carry him in my arms - if he only taught Justification by Faith and the efficacy of the Word in the Means of Grace.

I have never seen positive results from the campaigns that elect one person or another.

Tell me, is WELS better off for so many years under Mark Schroeder.

May 14, 2007

Dear called workers,

President Gurgel has announced he will decline nomination for reelection at the synod convention this summer. He mailed a letter to all of you late last week explaining his thoughts. If you have not yet received it, it should be arriving shortly. 

Sincerely,

Joel Hochmuth
Director of Communications
WELS
414-256-3230
joel.hochmuth@sab.wels.net

Nine years later, Mark Schroeder has leveraged the damage done by Gurgel and Mischke before him.

One example will suffice - Schroeder went to Appleton to cut a deal for Ski, and soon Ski's own district broke its rules and sent Ski down to Round Rock, Texas.
That was symbolic of "No one touches the Mark Jeske Crime Family."

The feminist-gay-Church Growth agenda of the Church and Change contingent continues unabated. Gurgel was bad, so bad he was forced to leave the presidency? He was the savior of WELS before he became SP. Schroeder is worse than Gurgel.




Shroeder could not even take a stand for a good translation of the Bible, though he told others he hated the New NIV, which is now standard and unopposed in WELS.

One WELS pastor had his son contact me and leak all kinds of information through Ichabod. He was standing at the computer while he did that, so he could say, "I never wrote to Ichabod." I have enough sources so I could determine quite a bit about what was going on.

I am pleased to say that official tabloid for synod politics, Christian News, never misses a chance to sully its own reputation for bad reporting, bad facts, and bad faith.


ELDONUTs Should Stick to the Truth - Stay on the Vine

$
0
0


ELDONUTs continue to complain about this blog to someone who has written nothing here at all, not even an anonymous, blind, don't-tell-Mom comment. I laughed as I said on the phone, "Isn't my email address clear enough on the top of the blog?" I made it more apparent for those who wanted to send a message. For that I got some unwanted spam, but I can zap that to the junk folder.

The so-called Lutherans of today do not like Luther's teaching, nor do they even name the English Luther Bible developed by Tyndale in conjunction with the Lutheran Reformation. Tyndale gave his life for the Scriptures, and the fat slugs of Lutherdom will not even mention the King James Bible when speaking about translations.

Of course, the really conservative ones use the Babtist New King James Bible. The very departure from the Reformation that Luther deplored is embraced by those who trade on his name.

The same cranky and arrogant spirit is found in Christian News, the Missouri Synod, WELS, the ELS, and the venomous CLC (sic). They share with ELCA and Thrivent the same disdain for the unborn child and Justification by Faith.

Thrivent can fund abortion-on-demand through Planned Parenthood, as long as the grants keep coming. No one has provided an adequate excuse for this. A few LCMS pastor fussed for a month - five years after Brett Meyer exposed the Thrivent Planned Parenthood funding on this blog.

Missouri alone makes over $50 million a year from Thrivent, so that is worth a few million babies.

This incredible hardness of heart toward the unborn is best explained by how ashamed these Lutheran sects are - ashamed of faith. No, they will say they are 100% for faith, but not Justification by Faith. Even ELCA will dust off faith every so often. But they all agree with ELCA's Universalism, which is the excrement of rancid Pietism.

This Pietism phase came from a genuine interest in Biblical piety, studying the actual content of the Bible. But Pietism began as a program, and such programs have a way of removing precise Biblical teaching in favor of cooperation and just getting along.

Every argument against Justification by Faith is rationalistic. Example - "If Jesus died for the sins of the world, then everyone is already forgiven." I realize that having poor teachers and hearty drinking buddies are both adverse to learning in seminary. But what keeps the future pastors from studying the Word of God on their own? What keeps them from the low cost - and even the free versions - of Luther's Galatians?



A Program of Friendliness
The answer to the nastiness of Christian News and the Lutheran sects is not a program of friendliness, like the Friendship Sunday fad that WELS promoted - copying Fuller Seminary.

The only solution is teaching the singular purpose of the Bible - Justification by Faith. As Luther wrote, the Scriptures are a long sermon about the man Jesus, to create and sustain faith. Through this faith created by the Spirit in the Word, God grants forgiveness and salvation.

But there is far more to this faith that simply trusting in God's mercy and salvation. The believer is united with Christ and the Spirit dwells in the believer's heart. That moves the Christian to hear the Gospel with gladness and to live a life of continuous contrition for sin and joy in forgiveness.

The more an individual dwells on the True Vine through the Means of Grace, the more fruitful he is for the Kingdom. See John 15. The two kinds of cleansing are clear in that passage. Believers are cleansed through the Word of Grace, that they might be even more fruitful. The unfruitful are pruned away to be gathered up and burned.

We should not be shocked that those who devote themselves to Justification Without Faith (UOJ) are so unproductive, proud, harsh, mean, self-centered, and cruel. They lay waste to households for their revenge and destroy congregations to get even with people who offend their delicate feelings.




John 15 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you.
Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.
I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.
If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.
Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be my disciples.
As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.
10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
11 These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.
12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.
Viewing all 11959 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>